tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post3434323889667980269..comments2023-11-05T00:38:56.097-07:00Comments on 21st Century British Nationalism: The Leeds Trial, Collett Con and A Falling Out Amongst Thieves.Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-17228382467975491992010-08-18T09:00:16.920-07:002010-08-18T09:00:16.920-07:00I have explained time after time after time why th...I have explained time after time after time why the Decembrists were wrong.<br /><br />They wanted to kick Collett straight out of the party, without any recourse to his constitutional and legal rights as a member - which is unlawful.<br /><br />By asking for unlawful demands that would have resulted in the party being sued, they had to go.<br /><br />I did not want to protect collett, but the law was clear - the BNP could not just kick Collett out as they wished.<br /><br />Therefore I had to defend Collett, as by doing so I defended the legal interests of the party.<br /><br />If they had not ;<br /><br />1) undertook an unlawful campaign in the party and outside the party using anonymous attack blogs to attack collett and the party<br /><br />2) been incompetent enough to get caught doing 1)<br /><br />3) Made unlawful demands to force a BNP member out unlawfully and ensure the party could have been sued<br /><br />4) stolen the BNP membership list and used it for mailings their supporters mail shots attacking Griffin and collett<br /><br />5) stupid enough to get caught doing 4) <br /><br /><br />Then they would have been able to undertake a lawful, internal party campaign to get the issues around collett investigated.<br /><br />They walked into Griffin trap, by doing exactly as he wanted.Defender of Libertyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-9094424483640730322010-08-18T06:04:09.872-07:002010-08-18T06:04:09.872-07:00Why were the Decembrists wrong?
They wanted shot ...Why were the Decembrists wrong?<br /><br />They wanted shot of Collett for his scamming. Walker and Hannam for their gross incompetence. They wanted Griffin to remain as political leader. They wanted a proper management structure for the Party, one that Griffin couldn't meddle in. They wanted financial transparency. They wanted the party back for it's members, a Party that would fight to save Britain.<br /><br />So what was wrong with the Decembrists?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-42310606922384134102010-08-18T05:51:12.938-07:002010-08-18T05:51:12.938-07:00Now you are admitting that you knew about Griffin ...Now you are admitting that you knew about Griffin and Collett's scams and you were well aware about the gross level of incompetence of Walker and Hannam (who were only used by Griffin because they were complicit in his scams) why have you waited until now to voice this? Why didn't you support the Decembrists(prior to their blog exposing this) when they were challenging Griffin about it all? Why did you allow yourself to be used as one of Griffins vicious attack dogs?<br /><br /><br />1) I didnt 'know' anything, I had suspicions but no factual evidence.<br /><br />2) I have no idea of walker or hannams roles in anything, and thats why I am not mentioning them. I speaking only about what I know and what I can surmise.<br /><br />3) The Decebmrists, like Griffin, wanted to treat the BNP constitution like toilet paper. Thats why they had to go. Now Griffin is doing the same, and thats why he has to go as they had to go.<br /><br />4) The Decembrists were wrong, and thats why I attacked them. It is also why I am attacking Griffin now, as he is as wrong as they were.Defender of Libertyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-82136326027849923602010-08-18T05:51:10.492-07:002010-08-18T05:51:10.492-07:00Now you are admitting that you knew about Griffin ...Now you are admitting that you knew about Griffin and Collett's scams and you were well aware about the gross level of incompetence of Walker and Hannam (who were only used by Griffin because they were complicit in his scams) why have you waited until now to voice this? Why didn't you support the Decembrists(prior to their blog exposing this) when they were challenging Griffin about it all? Why did you allow yourself to be used as one of Griffins vicious attack dogs?<br /><br /><br />1) I didnt 'know' anything, I had suspicions but no factual evidence.<br /><br />2) I have no idea of walker or hannams roles in anything, and thats why I am not mentioning them. I speaking only about what I know and what I can surmise.<br /><br />3) The Decebmrists, like Griffin, wanted to treat the BNP constitution like toilet paper. Thats why they had to go. Now Griffin is doing the same, and thats why he has to go as they had to go.<br /><br />4) The Decembrists were wrong, and thats why I attacked them. It is also why I am attacking Griffin now, as he is as wrong as they were.Defender of Libertyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-28340615224222588222010-08-18T05:35:08.263-07:002010-08-18T05:35:08.263-07:00Now you are admitting that you knew about Griffin ...Now you are admitting that you knew about Griffin and Collett's scams and you were well aware about the gross level of incompetence of Walker and Hannam (who were only used by Griffin because they were complicit in his scams) why have you waited until now to voice this? Why didn't you support the Decembrists(prior to their blog exposing this) when they were challenging Griffin about it all? Why did you allow yourself to be used as one of Griffins vicious attack dogs?<br /><br />You know fine well that what they done was for the good of the Party and not for self interest!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-1871992949171335832010-08-18T05:22:53.500-07:002010-08-18T05:22:53.500-07:00Oh my it all makes horrible sense.
Didn't Gri...Oh my it all makes horrible sense.<br /><br />Didn't Griffin and Jackie accuse Warren Bennett, in front of a roomful of members, of theft when all along they both knew it was a lie.<br /><br />£500 rings a bell for that one.<br /><br />Isn't that why one female councillor resigned, on the strength of hearing that lie?<br />When she realised what a corrupt back stabbing cabal reigned at the top of the BNP.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-84544502894495706642010-08-18T04:38:43.428-07:002010-08-18T04:38:43.428-07:00http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article68...http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6887304.ece<br /><br />http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2009/10/23/nick-griffin-claims-former-nf-leader-offered-him-gay-sex/<br /><br />http://newsbizarre.com/2009/10/is-nick-griffin-gay.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com