Internet Censorship on academic research on Racial Differences

The following articles relate to the physiological differences related to race which are based on inheritence, and hence genetic , factors.

To say that the genetic reality of race does not exist is blatant lie propagated by pseudo-scientists with an overt political agenda such as Steven Rose.

The following articles are those that stil appear on the internet regarding scientific evidence of racial differences, the list of articles below that are copies of internet are articles that have been removed by Google ;

This is scientific censorship.

http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/stalkers/jpr01.html

Ever since 1758, when the Swedish naturalist Carolus Linnaeus created the classification system still used in biology today, most zoologists have recognized at least the four human subdivisions Linnaeus delineated: Asians, American Indians, Europeans, and Africans. (Technically, some would group the first two Linnaean subdivisions together, thus yielding three major races, often termed, mongoloids, caucasoids, and negroids.) Such high-level classifications do not rule out making finer, hierarchical subdivisions within these major groups.

A race is what zoologists term a variety or subdivision of a species. Each race (or variety) is characterized by a more or less distinct combination of inherited morphological, behavioral, physiological traits. In flowers, insects, and non-human mammals, zoologists consistently and routinely study the process of racial differentiation. Formation of a new race takes place when, over several generations, individuals in one group reproduce more frequently among themselves than they do with individuals in other groups. This process is most apparent when the individuals live in diverse geographic areas and therefore evolve unique, recognizable adaptations (such as skin color) that are advantageous in their specific environments. But differentiation also occurs under less extreme circumstances. Zoologists and evolutionists refer to such differentiated populations as races. (Within the formal taxonomic nomenclature of biology, races are termed subspecies). Zoologists have identified two or more races (subspecies) in most mammalian species.


Here I will briefly summarize the findings. Asians and Africans consistently aggregate at opposite ends, with Europeans intermediate, on a continuum that includes over 60 anatomical and social variables. These 60 variables include brain size, intelligence, sexual habits, fertility, personality, temperament, speed of maturation, and longevity. If race were an arbitrary, socially-constructed concept, devoid of all biological meaning, such consistent relationships would not exist.

Those objecting to the concept of race argue that the taxonomic definitions are arbitrary and subjective. Although critics are correct to point out that the variation within each race is extremely large, that there is disagreement as to exactly how many races there are, and that there is a blurring of category edges because of admixture, they are in error when they claim that classifications are arbitrary. For example, race-critic Jared Diamond, in the 1994 issue of Discover magazine, surveyed half a dozen geographically variable traits and formed very different races depending on which traits he picked. Classifying people using anti-malarial genes, lactose tolerance, fingerprint patterns, or skin color resulted in the Swedes of Europe being placed in the same category as the Xhosa and Fulani of Africa, the Ainu of Japan, and the Italians of Europe.

Jared Diamond's classifications, however, are arbitrary and nonsensical because they have little, if any, predictive value beyond the initial classification. More significantly, they confuse the scientific meaning of race, that is, a recognizable (or distinguishable) geographic population. In everyday life, as in evolutionary biology, a "negroid" is someone whose ancestors were born in sub-Saharan Africa, and likewise for a "caucasoid" and a "mongoloid." This definition fits with the temporal bounds offered by the best current theory of human evolution. Thus, since Homo sapiens first appeared in Africa about 200,000 years ago, branched off into Europe about 110,000 years ago, and into Asia 70,000 years after that, a "negroid" is someone whose ancestors, between 4,000 and (to accommodate recent migrations) 20 generations ago, were born in sub-Saharan Africa -- and likewise, for a caucasoid and a mongoloid.

Social definitions -- that is, self-identification and other-identification actually accord quite well with the physical evidence. Mongoloids, caucasoids, and negroids can be distinguished on the basis of obvious differences in skeletal morphology, hair and facial features, as well by blood groups and DNA fingerprints. Forensic anthropologists regularly classify skeletons of decomposed bodies by race. For example, narrow nasal passages and a short distance between eye sockets identify a caucasoid person, distinct cheekbones characterize a mongoloid person, and nasal openings shaped like an upside down heart typify a negroid person. In certain criminal investigations, the race of a perpetrator can be identified from blood, semen, and hair samples. To deny the predictive validity of race at this level is nonscientific and unrealistic.

The mean pattern of educational and economic achievement within multi-racial countries such as Canada and the United States has increasingly been found to prove valid internationally. For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps because it contradicts the politically correct theories that intelligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a Euro-American culture). Blacks in the Caribbean, Britain, Canada and sub-Saharan Africa as well as in the United States have low IQ scores relative to whites. For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the same international distribution that occurs within the United States (that is, Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data).

One neurohormonal contributor to crime and reproductive behavior is testosterone. Studies show that black college students and military veterans have 3% to 19% more testosterone than their white counterparts. The Japanese have even lower amounts than whites. Sex hormones are circulated throughout the body and are known to activate many brain-behavior systems involving aggression and reproduction. For example, around the world the rate of dizygotic twinning per 1,000 births (caused by a double ovulation), is less than 4 among Asians, 8 among Europeans, and 16 or greater among Africans. The differences in multiple birthing are known to be heritable through the race of the mother regardless of the race of the father, as found in Asian/European matings in Hawaii and European/African matings in Brazil.

Publication of The Bell Curve brought widespread public attention to the research on race that has been accumulating over the last 30 years in technical and specialist journals that demonstrably challenges each and every article of the dogma of biological egalitarianism. Startling, and alarming to many, is the conclusion that follows from these data that if all people were treated the same, most average race differences would not disappear. With egalitarianism under siege, there has been a major effort to get the "race genie" back in the bottle, to squeeze the previously tabooed toothpaste back into the tube, to suppress or deny the latest scientific evidence on race, genetics, and behavior.

Regardless of the extent to which the media promote "politically correct," but scientifically wrong, resolutions from professional societies such as the American Anthropological Association, facts remain facts and require appropriate scientific, not political, explanation. On average, the Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese are more similar to each other and are different from Australians, Israelis and the Swedes, who in turn are similar to each other and are different from Nigerians, Kenyans, and Jamaicans. None of this should be construed as meaning that environmental factors play no part individual development. But with each passing year and each new study, the evidence for the genetic contribution to individual and group differences becomes more firmly established than ever.


http://www.geocities.com/race_articles/lynn_race_evol.html

Hominids first evolved in tropical and subtropical latitudes, most probably reaching sapiens status in the highlands of East Africa. From this ancestral population some groups migrated north into Eurasia and evolved there into the Caucasoids and Mongoloids. Colonizing temperate and cold environments, they encountered the cognitively demanding problems of survival in cold winters. These problems consisted principally of securing a food supply by hunting large animals and of keeping warm in winter by making fires, clothing and shelters. Survival in these difficult conditions acted as a selection pressure favoring enhanced intelligence and explains why the Caucasoids and the Mongoloids are the races which have evolved the highest intelligence.

In a previous paper the world literature on racial differences in intelligence was reviewed (Lynn, 1991). It was shown that the Caucasoid peoples of North America, Britain, Continental Europe and Australasia obtain mean IQs of around 100. Mongoloid peoples in East Asia and in North America typically obtain mean IQs a little higher in the range of 101-108. They are also characterized by strong visuospatial abilities and weaker verbal abilities. The same pattern is found in the Amerindians, but the level of their intelligence is lower with a mean of about 90.

Negroid peoples are generally considered to have a mean IQ of approximately 85, but this is only true of those in the United States and Britain. African Negroids have a mean IQ in the region of 70. American and British Negroids are more properly considered as Negroid --Caucasoid hybrids, and hybridization has evidently raised their intelligence levels to about midway between the two parent races. The South East Asian races consisting of Micronesians, Melanesians, Polynesians, Maoris and Australian Aborigines typically have mean IQs in the range of 80-90.

These differences in intelligence test performance are corroborated by racial differences in the building of civilization. Only the Mongoloids and the Caucasians have built civilizations and all the discoveries and inventions from early metal working to the contemporary scientific advances have been made by these two races. The consistency of the racial differences in intelligence test performance and contributions to civilization suggests that they have a genetic basis, as argued in detail by Jensen ( 1972, 1973, 1980).



http://www.newsrx.com/newsletters/Disease-Prevention-Week/2006-04-25/042720063331475DP.html

April 25th, 2006

Of the more than 40,000 persons who die each year in the U.S. from pulmonary fibrosis, the mortality rate among African-Americans is twice as high Caucasians. According to a physiologist from Belarus who's worked at the Medical University of South Carolina for almost 10 years, the discrepancy can be traced to a key growth factor.

http://www.espcr.org/espcr/b_iss/Dis-9b.htm

Skin color and thus melanin content of the skin are a most striking differences characterizing racial groups. Is skin function related to skin color 7 Is skin color related to modulation of racial differences in skin responses to chemical and environmental agents ?

Racial differences in skin function have been investigated: Weigand et al (1,2) showed increased intracellular cohesion in blacks; Reinertson and Wheatley (3) higher lipid content in black skin; furthermore, blacks have higher electrical skin resistance levels that whites (4,5).

Mechanisms explaining these differences are minimally documented. By measuring some biophysical parameters of the skin, we have investigated and classified racial differences in skin reactions after a variety of stimuli with the hypothesis that understanding the basic skin differences among the races will provide insights into skin function.


http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/490951_4

Several small studies have shown racial differences in endothelial-dependent forearm vascular resistance[18,19] or brachial artery dilatation.[11,20] Perregaux et al studied brachial FMD in 52 healthy, nonsmoking participants (24 African American, 28 age-matched Caucasians) between the ages of 20 and 47.[11] The percent change was significantly lower in African Americans (1.76 ± 0.56%) compared to age-matched Caucasians (8.79 ± 1.22%, P < .05). Additionally, significant differences in absolute change in brachial FMD by sex in Caucasians existed (P < .05); however, there was no significant difference by sex in African Americans. Although P values were not provided, African American women had less brachial artery FMD compared to Caucasian women.


The following academic articles on racial differences have been removed from the Internet by Google - though those interested could get the articles themselves if they applied;

Racial Differences in Hemodynamic Responses to Environmental ...Covariance analyses indicated that the racial differences during cold ..... Sex differences in physiological responses to stress and in coronary heart ...
circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/circulationaha;101/19/2284 - Similar pages

Racial Differences in Endothelial FunctionStudies of physiological mechanisms to support racial differences in vasoreactivity have found elevated levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1), ...
www.medscape.com/viewarticle/490951_4 - Similar pages

Racial Differences in Blood Pressure and Forearm Vascular ...to physiological and psychological stresses,. the results would suggest the presence of. important racial differences in neurogenic ...
www.psychosomaticmedicine.org/cgi/reprint/50/1/57.pdf - Similar pages

Using Genetic Admixture to Explain Racial Differences in Insulin ...One way to investigate putative genetic factors contributing to racial differences in complex physiological traits such as insulin sensitivity (SI) is by ...
diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/52/4/1047 - Similar pages

Sex and Racial Differences in Pharmacological Response: Effect of ...There are known physiological differences be-. tween the skin of males and females and between. the skin types of various racial and ethnic popu-. lations. ...
www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/jwh.2005.14.30 - Similar pages

Racial Differences in Hemodynamic Responses to Environmental ...These results suggest that the locus of racial differences in vascular reactivity ..... Classic physiological models have postulated that a hyperdynamic ...
circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/101/19/2284 - Similar pages

A Physiological Basis for Disparities in Diabetes and Heart ...It is tempting to ascribe these racial/ethnic differences to genetic influences (21 .... Ludwig, D. S. (2002) The glycemic index: physiological mechanisms ...
jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/132/9/2492 - Similar pages

Racial Differences in the Relaxation Response of Hypertensives ...with white females on the physiological. variables, results were similar to .... Anderson NB, Lane JD, Muranaka M, Williams RB Jr: Racial differences in ...
www.psychosomaticmedicine.org/cgi/reprint/54/1/71.pdf - Similar pages

Racial Differences in Endothelin-1 at Rest and in Response to ...The underlying physiological mechanisms responsible for enhanced vasoconstrictive .... Data AnalysesInitial analyses of possible racial differences in ...
hyper.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/35/3/722 - Similar pages
[ More results from hyper.ahajournals.org ]

Racial Differences in Insulin Secretion and Sensitivity in ...Using Genetic Admixture to Explain Racial Differences in Insulin-Related ... A Physiological Basis for Disparities in Diabetes and Heart Disease Risk among ...
www.obesityresearch.org/cgi/content/abstract/8/7/506 - Similar pages

Racial differences in lipid metabolism in women with abdominal ...Palmitate Ra across a physiological range of plasma epinephrine ... Therefore, it is possible that racial differences in lipolytic sensitivity to insulin or ...
ajpregu.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/279/3/R944 - Similar pages

abdominal obesity Racial differences in lipid metabolism in women withPhysiological Society, 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda MD 20814-3991. ... sible that racial differences in lipolytic sensitivity to ...
ajpregu.physiology.org/cgi/reprint/279/3/R944.pdf - Similar pages

Here the article on the scientist H. J. Eysenck has been removed from the Internet and only the cached refernce to his work on racial differences exists ;

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:NVkrVZ1XRD8J:www.indiana.edu/~intell/eysenck.shtml+physiological+racial+differences&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=40&gl=uk

Eysenck is most famous for his criticism of psychotherapy (see Eysenck, 1957), his rigorous, measurement-based approach to the study of personality, and for his ability to translate psychological ideas for the popular press. His work on human intelligence is also notable. In 1969, Eysenck’s student Arthur Jensen published a controversial paper asserting that racial differences in intelligence test scores might have genetic origins (Jensen, 1969). Eysenck defended Jensen, and received much criticism in the ensuing controversy. Eysenck later published his own evidence that biological processes might be implicated in racial differences in intelligence (see Eysenck, 1971). By the time he wrote his 1990 autobiography, he had moderated his views to give more weight to environmental influences (Mclaughlin, 2000).

Racial Differences in Adipocyte Size and Relationship to the ...Objective: To determine whether racial differences exist in the ..... study is needed to determine the true physiological basis for these racial differences ...
www.obesityresearch.org/cgi/content/full/12/6/990 - Similar pages

Uncoupling proteins: a molecular basis for racial differences in ...What other UCP alleles influence observed racial differences in EE? ... Physiological effects of variants in human uncoupling proteins: UCP2 influences ...
www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/75/4/607?ck=nck - Similar pages

Racism and Psychological and Emotional Injury: Recognizing and ...Racial differences in combat-related PTSD: Empirical findings and ... Physiological responses to racism and discrimination: An assessment of the evidence. ...
tcp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/35/1/13 - Similar pages

Racial Differences in SportsRacial Differences in Athletics: What’s Ethics Got To Do With It? ..... types and physiological reactions reveal the prerequisites for superior athletic ...
www.smith.edu/philosophy/Taboo55.html - 80k - Cached - Similar pages

Stress Reactivity and Type A Behavior"Racial differences in cardiovascular reactivity to mental arithmetic. ... in part from physiological differences in sympathetic nervous system reactivity. ...
www.duke.edu/~jdlane/STRESWWW.HTM - 20k - Cached - Similar pages

In Situ Lipolytic Responses to Isoproterenol and Physiological ...It cannot be excluded that racial differences would be present at lower ... to isoproterenol and physiological stressors in abdominal sc adipose tissue in ...
jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/full/83/11/4054 - Similar pages

Uncoupling proteins: a molecular basis for racial differences in ...specific alleles of specific genes that contribute to racial differences .... Physiological effects of vari-. ants in human uncoupling proteins: UCP2 ...
www.ajcn.org/cgi/reprint/75/4/607.pdf - Similar pages

Racial differences in the results of glaucoma filtration surgery ...In vivo biophysical characterization of skin physiological differences in races. ... Maibach H. Cutaneous reactive hyperaemia: racial differences induced by ...
www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=504825 - Similar pages

Arousal and Cognition: Race, Arousal, and Reminiscence -- Farley ...[Abstract/Free Full Text]; Johnson, L. C. and M. N. Landon (1965) "Eccrine sweat gland activity and racial differences in resting skin conductance. ...
jbs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/10/1/119 - Similar pages


Here is another article that has been removed and only the cached version remains ;

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:nmZb7Thaej8J:https://www.the-aps.org/press/conference/eb/14.htm+physiological+racial+differences&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=56&gl=uk

New Indicators for Predicting Hypertension in African-American Males
Young males with the disease are found to have arteries with a diminished capacity to expand in response to blood pressure

New Orleans, LA -- The threat of hypertension is real and deadly. According to the National Center for Health Statistics, 23 percent of Americans ages 20-74 suffer from hypertension (more commonly known as high blood pressure). Some 15,000 die each year from this disorder; more than 32 million visit the doctor's office each year for treatment, but the disease affects African Americans disproportionately.

Background

African-American males are at higher risk for hypertension than other demographic groups. An estimated 35 percent of African American men have this disorder, leading to staggering financial costs related to medical and disability expenses.

For years, the scientific community has stated that a variety of environmental, behavioral and biological factors have been proposed to account for the racial differences in the prevalence and severity of hypertension. A new research study suggests that arterial compliance may be an indicator of potential hypertension in African American males.


@article {Chen:2006:0312-5963:957, author = "Chen, Mei-Ling ...For example, racial differences in the first-pass metabolism of a drug following ... For example, greater ethnic/racial differences were observed in oral ...
www.ingentaconnect.com/.../cpk/2006/00000045/00000010/art00001;jsessionid=7hq2dnu6jd1pv.alice?format=bib - Similar pages

Ethnic Differences in Stressors, Resources, and Psychological ...Psychological and physiological health in African American and Caucasian ... Racial differences in family support and formal service utilization among older ...
gerontologist.gerontologyjournals.org/cgi/content/full/45/1/90 - Similar pages

REVIEW RACIAL DIFFERENCES IN ALCOHOL SENSITIVITYThe de- tions of racial differences, objective and sub- ... (Wolff, 1972) suggests that physiological fac- flushing phenomenon and suggestions for fu- ...
alcalc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/21/1/93.pdf - Similar pages

Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status and the Health of Pregnant ...Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socio-economic status, stress and discrimination . Journal of Health Psychology, 2(3), 335-351 . ...
hpq.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/12/2/285 - Similar pages


http://content.karger.com/produktedb/produkte.asp?typ=fulltext&file=NED2005025003135

The Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Study: Objectives and Design

The REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study is a national, population-based, longitudinal study of 30,000 African-American and white adults aged 45 years. The objective is to determine the causes for the excess stroke mortality in the Southeastern US and among African-Americans.

http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/docs/001-501/001-501.html

Summary.--The incidences of malignant melanoma recorded by 59 population-based cancer registries were investigated to determine the effects of racial and skin-colour differences. White populations exhibited a wide range of melanoma incidences and females commonly, though not invariably, had a higher incidence than males. Non-white populations experienced in general a much lower incidence of melanoma although there was some overlap of white and non-white rates. No predominant sex difference emerged among non-whites.

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:bpnlw2qlzGIJ:www.evms.edu/vpc/newsletter/1998-spring.html+physiological+racial+differences&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=70&gl=uk

Race and Increased Risk of Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer exhibits considerable racial and ethnic variation. Men of Asian descent, for example, have a very low incidence and mortality from prostate cancer, while African-American men have the highest incidence and mortality from prostate cancer in the world

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/110484369/ABSTRACT?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0

Racial differences in heat tolerance
Paul T. Baker
Biophysics Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Coronary Calcium, Race, and Genes -- Manolio and Bild 22 (3): 359 ...This is not the first study to demonstrate racial differences in coronary calcium .... of the many social, medical, and physiological concomitants of race. ...
atvb.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/22/3/359 - Similar pages

Charles Merz, Peak Oil and Civilisational Collapse.

The basis of all life, and human civilisations, is energy. Whether that energy source be calories or oil the same energy exchange process is the basis of the existence of all living organisms and all human civilisations, nations and societies.

Political Power, simply defined is the total amount of energy available to the political class in its management and development of the nation and society.

As the amount of energy available to a nation diminishes then social entropy and anarchy increases. As the street lights flicker and fade, then the power of the State is weakened and diminished. The LAW can only function when it can be policed and imposed. When the energy in a society diminishes then the power of the state to impose order is also diminished. As the darkness grows, so too does chaos grow.

Economic activity is also itself merely an aspect of energy production. Capital is merely symbolic of imbedded energy. The entire economic process is merely an aspect of the energy production process. Without energy the the industries that produce the mining equipment cannot produce the industrial equipment to open mines, the mines cannot produce raw materials and transport it to the industries that process the raw materials, the industries that handle raw materials cannot refine those raw materials into useful materials and transport them to the factories, the factories cannot turn those useful materials into consumer goods and products to sell, the shops cannot open and employ staff to sell those goods, the consumers cannot get to the shops to buy the goods and the people do not have jobs to give them an income to buy those goods on sale in the shops.

The true power of a nation is simply its own ability to produce and satisfy its own internal energy requirements. The GDP of a nation is not related to how many bits of paper it prints or how many lumps of useless shiny metal it possesses or what its people produce, spend and consume per year - it is simply how much energy the nation is capable of producing for itself in order to maintain and develop its own internal social complexity. A` nation that produces enough of its own energy to support its own internal development and that can export that energy is a nation which has growing GDP.

GDP should be replaced by EDP = Energy Domestically Produced.

Just 100 years ago the candle was the only light we had at night. The Oil Age has enlightened the earth and banished the dark. But the victory of light over darkness is about to see a dangerous reversal.

In 1916 in Great Britain their were over 500 power companies producing electricity for consumers each with their own different power supply voltage specifications and 23 different plug designs.

In 1916 Merz pointed out to Parliament that the UK could use its small size to its advantage, by creating a dense distribution grid to feed its industries electricity efficiently. His findings led to the Williamson Report of 1918, which in turn created the Electricity Supply Bill of 1919. The bill was the first step towards an integrated system.

These principles in the William Report from the 1904 paper "Power Station Design" became the template for power planning worldwide. They were embodied in the same year when the world's biggest power station opened near Newcastle upon Tyne. Using newly invented steam turbines, it generated power for the world's first electric commuter railway between the city and its seaside suburbs, also engineered by Merz and McLellan. At the same time Local shipbuilding, mining and heavy engineering industries began using electrically driven tools too.

Under Merz's direction, power stations across north-east England were connected using higher voltages over longer distances. By the start of the First World War it was the largest integrated power system in Europe supplying the cheapest and most reliable power in Britain.


Charles Merz sat on the Weir Committee, which produced the more significant Electricity (Supply) Act of 1926, leading to the setting up of the National Grid.
The Electricity Supply Act 1926 which recommended that a 'National Gridiron' was enacted in order to create an integrated national energy supply network for Britain. The act also established the Central Electricity Board that began operating in 1933. By 1938 the National Grid was operating as a national system.

Once the National Grid was established in 1938 with a standardised power supply network in operation and a standardised plug design created to use on electrical appliances connected to the electrical system, the birth of the mass production era had occurred. Mass production of consumer goods was made possible as a process only through the standardisation of the electrical power supply network and the standardisation of the plugs that allowed those electrical goods to be plugged into the main supply.

The National Grid was nationalised in 1947 by the Electricity Act 1947. The seven year plan for the creation of the National Grid with its 30,000 electricity mast network was a pivotal moment in human history.

It was not Henry Ford who is the architect of mass production, it was Charles Merz. It was the vision of Merz who created the integrated electricity generation and supply networks that allowed the creation of the basis of the consumer society.


An irregular and unreliable energy supply network, and a non-standardised specification for consumer products, meant that the process of manufacturing consumer goods could not be undertaken easily. An electric radio bought in one area with one plug design would not work in another area on another voltage with a different plug design. It was Charles Merz who saw that both had to be integrated nationally in order for demand for consumer goods to be created. The National Grid ensured that the consumer society could be created. Electrification created the advanced society we live in today.

Pioneers like Nikolai Tesla, Thomas Edison and Charles Merz were the visionaries who created the modern world. It was their technological advances, and visionary national engineering plans, that allowed the Oil Age to become the epoch of human culture.

The anthropologist Leslie White depicts human history as a progression of 'Power Shifts' whereby a country or civilisation undergoes a technological and social transformation based on its unlocking of a new energy source to power social complexity. White stated that " Culture evolves as the amount of energy harnessed per capita per year is increased, or the efficiency of the instrumental means of putting energy to work is increased ". Culture, when measured in relation to its ability to unlock energy, evolves every time it unlocks a new source of power. All Human Cultures are dependent upon energy.

All national cultures are manifestations of the prevalent Energy Culture which power that nations internal social complexity.

Political power increases when energy supply is increased. A nation is diminished socially, politically, internationally and culturally when it suffers a cut in national energy production. As the light begins to fade away, then the power of the nation begins to fade.

Peak Oil threatens to make our nation dependent upon the Islamic theocracies of the Middle East for our oil supplies, the Russian Empire for our gas supplies and any other foreign source of energy we can beg for.

Unless the Green Revolution is enacted then we will have surrendered our national independence just in order to keep our lights on.

Charles Hesterman Merz (5 October 1874 - 14 or 15 October 1940), is one of the greatest forgotten Britons.

It was his vision and drive that brought Britain out of the 19th century and dependence on coal, and into the 21st century and electrification.

He was the architect of a human Power Shift like no other in human history.

Today we stand at the brink of the crisis of Peak Oil and unless we begin the process of creating the Green Revolution and create the 100 % Renewable Energy Economy based on total national energy independence from renewable energy sources then we face a civilisational collapse like no other seen before in human history.

Today we need a new Charles Merz to step forward, a man with a new vision and the financial means to put it in place, before the nightmare of Peak Oil begins and Britain enters a new perpetual Dark Ages.




http://www.makingthemodernworld.org.uk/stories/the_second_industrial_revolution/05.ST.01/?scene=7

Analysis of the Article by Chief Rabbi Sacks

The article yesterday by Chief Rabbi Sacks was one of the best articles I have read on the internet for a long, long time.

There was virtually nothing I could disagree with - except for this part ; "Multiculturalism has run its course, and it is time to move on. It was a fine, even noble idea in its time. It was designed to make ethnic and religious minorities feel more at home, more appreciated and respected, and therefore better able to mesh with the larger society. It affirmed their culture. It gave dignity to difference. And in many ways it achieved its aims. Britain is a more open, diverse, energising, cosmopolitan environment than it was when I was growing up."

Multi-Culturalism was never about making ethnic and religious minorities feel at home here, it was a political mechanism designed to undermine the existing social orders of nations and undermine nationalism as a political force. Multi-Culturalism as an ideology was first defined and applied in Canada as a way of undermining the power of both Quebeci French Nationalists and the British elite in Canada.

The Bi-Cultural Canadian society was felt by people like Paul Yuzyk to be discrminatory against people like him who were neither part of the French Candadian or British Canadian elites. 'Alienated 'sections of Canadian society could be assisted into becoming Canadian by 'absorbing' them into the mainstream of politics by removing their status as an alienated group in Canadian society under the Multi-Cultural model. The power that the French and British elites had in Canada was such that immigrants into Canada who were not British or French, even if they were Europeans, suffered disadvantage.

Only by creating a multi-cultural Canadian society, and breaking down the Bi-Cultural power elites, could a 'fairer' society be crated though Yuzyk. Multi-Culturalism as a political model was based on the work of Paul Yuzyk (24 June 1913 – 9 July 1986) who was a Canadian historian and Senator. He was an associate professor of Slavic studies and professor of history at the University of Manitoba and a professor of Russian and Soviet history at the University of Ottawa.

In Canada, multiculturalism was first articulated by Progressive Conservative Senator Paul Yuzyk in his maiden Senate speech in 1964. It was officially adopted in 1971, following the Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism, a government body set up in response to the grievances of Canada's French-speaking minority (concentrated in the Province of Quebec).

The report of the Commission advocated that the Canadian government should recognize Canada as a bilingual and bicultural society and adopt policies to preserve this character. This policy was Multi-Culturalism.

Paul Yuzyk was born on June 24, 1913, in Pinto, Sask., — a sleepy town on the Canadian prairies with which he became so familiar as he traversed the land working on behalf of Ukrainian causes and helping Canadians develop a national consciousness. Sen. Yuzyk's father, a coal miner who came to Canada in 1913 during the first of the three waves of Ukrainian immigration to Canada, eventually moved the family to Saskatoon where young Paul completed public school and graduated with top marks in 1932. After receiving a teaching certificate from a Saskatoon teacher's training college, Sen. Yuzyk had his first jarring encounter with anti-East European policies that would later lead him on a crusade for ethnic minority rights in Canada.

His first face-to-face encounter with discrimination occurred when the neophyte teacher joined the ranks of college-educated Canadians searching for employment. Considered a "foreigner" by local school officials — the majority of which were British — Mr. Yuzyk was told that they did not want him to "contaminate" their children. The job, he was told, was the exclusive privilege of the English. But after months of pounding the pavement searching for a school that would accept him. and 77 job applications later, Mr. Yuzyk was finally offered a teaching position in a Ukrainian community near Hafford, Sask.

After several run-ins with discrimination, Mr. Yuzyk formed close alliances with other Canadians who felt that something had to be done about the alarming lack of accommodation for non-British, non-French Canadian citizens. Said Sen. Yuzyk about his experiences as an unwelcome job-seeker: "They really did things like that. We are a!l being called bohunks and foreigners. The result was to strengthen my Ukrainianism. 1 said to myself that if they called me a foreigner when I had been born in Canada, it meant Canada needed some changing." Indeed, the senator's tireless efforts in fighting for ethnic minority rights in Canada brought him national recognition and earned him plaudits from ethnocultural leaders throughout the country.

Sen. Yuzyk's crusade for multiculturalism caught the attention of then Prime Minister John Diefenbaker — himself a western Canadian and of European origin — who decided to reward the young Ukrainian's efforts with a seat in the Canadian Senate. Sen. Yuzyk became the first Ukrainian ever to be appointed to the Canadian Parliament's upper chamber.

On March 3, 1964, he presented his maiden speech in the ornate Senate chamber; it was titled "Canada: A Multicultural Nation," The address, which was warmly received by his colleagues, voiced the concerns of several ethnic groups that Canadians must accept the fact that they live in a "multicultural nation" — not a country of two solitudes comprised of the British and French. Said Sen. Yuzyk in a 1983 interview with The Ukrainian Weekly: "1 came out with the idea that Canada is a bilingual, multicultural nation, and that all are equals, and that there should be no discrimination of any kind against anyone — regardless of his background, whether for religious purposes, no discrimination based on color, race, or creed of any kind. And so multiculturalism really made Canadians conscious that there are cultural values that should be recognized."

Sen. Yuzyk's campaign for multiculuralism was capped in 1971 when Liberal Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau told the nation that the government, after extensive deliberation, would introduce an official policy of multiculturalism. The policy, which committed the government to support ethnocultural endeavors, was endorsed by all parties.

The statement by the Chief Rabbi that Britain is a more "open, diverse, energising, cosmopolitan environment " than the one he knew when he grew up is also very interesting. Note he does not say 'Nation' instead of environment. This is because he recognises that under Multi-Culturalism Britain is not a nation. Multi-Culturalism is in fact ' Separate Development' such as under the Apartheid regime of South Africa. It has destroyed society by fragmenting it. Britain is certainly a more 'open' society, the numbers of immigrants and terrorists entering the country prove that is correct. It is certainly more diverse, as the numbers of immigrant groups prove though diversity is itself not a good thing and nor does he say it is. Energising is also true, as the people in all their respective communities all now work for the benfit of themselves and their communities and not the nation itself. It is certainly a more cosmopolitan environment as well, and this also is not a moral thing by itself.

The Chief Rabbi makes two fundamentally important observations ;

1) The divides that had driven politics hitherto, especially class and wealth, became less salient after the 1960s. Other, more “lifestyle” issues took their place. At first these were construed in terms of the individual, but eventually they came to be framed in terms of groups: first Jews, then African-Americans, then women, then gays. It was not merely that these groups sought equal rights. The real change was that they defined themselves as oppressed. This was a seismic shift.

Here he says that the politics of the Group allied with the politics of victim status as used by those groups as collectives has damaged our nation and society. As a Jew he is making a direct attack on the Jewish individuals in the past who have used their group identity as a way to promote themselves and at the same time falsely promote their own sectarian political and social interests as representing the 'interests of the Jews as a group' above that of our society and the nation. This is a groundbreaking admission.

It reflects the reality that certain members of the Jewish groups took advantage of their minority status to damage the rights of the majority. What the Jews who did this have done is in fact damage the interests of all the British Jews as a community as a result. It is many of the Liberal Jews who have been the appeasers of Radical Islamists and who have primarily called those who warned of the dangers of Islamism as 'racists'.

It was many prominent Leftist Jews, such as researched by Kevin McDonald in his groundbreaking book The Culture of Critique
http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books-Preface.html
who supported mass immigration, Communism and Islamism as a way to undermine the powers of the British state and the White British indigenous community. The Jews who took the lead in this process, were then followed by the Blacks and homosexual groups who also employed the victim status dynamic for their own advantage, and they bear much of the burden for creating the nightmare situation we all face today.

The prospect of Eurabia is the greatest threat the Jews have ever faced in European history. If the immigration from Islamic nations is not stopped and reversed then the White indigenous people of Europe will be a minority by 2050. Before this point will have been reached Islamist insurgents in every European nation will have begun the Jihad via civil wars and the struggle to impose Sharia Law in our nations. When they succeed then we, both Jews and indigenous Europeans, will be under the control of Dhimmitude and Sharia Law.

As stated in the Times article below ;

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2409833.ece

One of the world’s most respected Deobandi scholars believes that aggressive military jihad should be waged by Muslims “to establish the supremacy of Islam” worldwide.

Justice Muhammad Taqi Usmani argues that Muslims should live peacefully in countries such as Britain, where they have the freedom to practise Islam, only until they gain enough power to engage in battle. "

The views of Muhammad Taqi Usmani explode the myth that the creed of offensive, expansionist jihad represents a distortion of traditional Islamic thinking.

A book published by Le Seuil in Paris imay further Western understanding of this reality. Written by the Swiss investigative reporter Sylvain Besson and not yet available in English, it publicizes the discovery and contents of a Muslim Brotherhood strategy document entitled "The Project," hitherto little known outside the highest counter-terrorism circles.

Besson's book, La conquête de l'Occident: Le projet secret des Islamistes (The Conquest of the West: The Islamists' Secret Project), recounts how, in November 2001, Swiss authorities acting on a special request from the White House entered the villa of a man named Yusuf Nada in Campione, a small Italian enclave on the eastern shore of Lake Lugano in Switzerland. Nada was the treasurer of the Al Taqwa bank, which allegedly funneled money to al Qaeda. In the course of their search of Nada's house, investigators stumbled onto "The Project," an unsigned, 14-page document dated December 1, 1982. Copies of the Project can be found here ;

http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Read.aspx?GUID={61829F93-7A81-4654-A2E8-F0A5E6DD3DC4}

The following tactics and techniques are among the many recommendations made in The Project:

Networking and coordinating actions between likeminded Islamist organizations;

Avoiding open alliances with known terrorist organizations and individuals to maintain the appearance of “moderation”;

Infiltrating and taking over existing Muslim organizations to realign them towards the Muslim Brotherhood’s collective goals;

Using deception to mask the intended goals of Islamist actions, as long as it doesn’t conflict with shari’a law;

Avoiding social conflicts with Westerners locally, nationally or globally, that might damage the long-term ability to expand the Islamist powerbase in the West or provoke a lash back against Muslims;

Establishing financial networks to fund the work of conversion of the West, including the support of full-time administrators and workers;

Conducting surveillance, obtaining data, and establishing collection and data storage capabilities;

Putting into place a watchdog system for monitoring Western media to warn Muslims of “international plots fomented against them”;

Cultivating an Islamist intellectual community, including the establishment of think-tanks and advocacy groups, and publishing “academic” studies, to legitimize Islamist positions and to chronicle the history of Islamist movements;

Developing a comprehensive 100-year plan to advance Islamist ideology throughout the world; Balancing international objectives with local flexibility;

Building extensive social networks of schools, hospitals and charitable organizations dedicated to Islamist ideals so that contact with the movement for Muslims in the West is constant;

Involving ideologically committed Muslims in democratically-elected institutions on all levels in the West, including government, NGOs, private organizations and labor unions;

Instrumentally using existing Western institutions until they can be converted and put into service of Islam;

Drafting Islamic constitutions, laws and policies for eventual implementation; Avoiding conflict within the Islamist movements on all levels, including the development of processes for conflict resolution;

Instituting alliances with Western “progressive” organizations that share similar goals;

Creating autonomous “security forces” to protect Muslims in the West;

Inflaming violence and keeping Muslims living in the West “in a jihad frame of mind”;

Supporting jihad movements across the Muslim world through preaching, propaganda, personnel, funding, and technical and operational support;

Making the Palestinian cause a global wedge issue for Muslims;

Adopting the total liberation of Palestine from Israel and the creation of an Islamic state as a keystone in the plan for global Islamic domination;

Instigating a constant campaign to incite hatred by Muslims against Jews and rejecting any discussions of conciliation or coexistence with them; Actively creating jihad terror cells within Palestine;

Linking the terrorist activities in Palestine with the global terror movement;

Collecting sufficient funds to indefinitely perpetuate and support jihad around the world;

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/704xewyj.asp?pg=2

http://www.kosovo.net/news/archive/2004/July_27/2.html

http://www.laweekly.com/index.php?option=com_lawcontent&task=view&id=12921&Itemid=47

First the Islamists will come for the Jews, then they will come for the nationalists and the patriots who will form the nucleus of the nationalist resistance to their plans for Sharia Law and the Global Caliphate, and then they will come for the Christians that refuse to pay the Jizya and wear the Zunnar.

The Jewish supremacists and the political Jews who used their ethnicity and Jewishness as a mechanism to subvert our society and culture have enacted the greatest of evils upon their own people. These short sighted fools have placed their own people under the threat of Eurabia.

This article by the Chief Rabbi is the basis of a new understanding as regards the threat to the Jews themselves by the actions of their so called 'leaders' in the past.

The Chief Rabbi has understood that the Jewish people have been misled, decieved, exploited and abused by their own people.

The fools who led them have led them almost directly into catastrophe.

We must thank the Rabbi for his brave and prescient words.

Chief Rabbi Stands up to be Counted

This is a groundbreaking article. I reproduce it in full here. If only our indigenous White British journalists had as much bottle as the Rabbi.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article2697772.ece

From The TimesOctober 20, 2007

Wanted: a national culture

Multiculturalism is a disasterJonathan Sacks

Multiculturalism has run its course, and it is time to move on. It was a fine, even noble idea in its time. It was designed to make ethnic and religious minorities feel more at home, more appreciated and respected, and therefore better able to mesh with the larger society. It affirmed their culture. It gave dignity to difference. And in many ways it achieved its aims. Britain is a more open, diverse, energising, cosmopolitan environment than it was when I was growing up.

But there has been a price to pay, and it grows year by year. Multiculturalism has led not to integration but to segregation. It has allowed groups to live separately, with no incentive to integrate and every incentive not to. It was intended to promote tolerance. Instead the result has been, in countries where it has been tried, societies more abrasive, fractured and intolerant than they once were.

Liberal democracy is in danger. Britain is becoming a place where free speech is at risk, non-political institutions are becoming politicised, and a combination of political correctness and ethnic-religious separatism is eroding the graciousness of civil society. Religious groups are becoming pressure groups. Boycotts and political campaigns are infecting professional bodies. Culture is fragmenting into systems of belief in which civil discourse ends and reasoned argument becomes impossible. The political process is in danger of being abandoned in favour of the media-attention-grabbing gesture. The politics of freedom risks descending into the politics of fear.

Multiculturalism emerged, more as a fact than a value, in the 1970s in the wake of mass migration from nonWestern to Western nations. It found a supportive environment in the intellectual mood of the time. The idea of one nation, one culture had come to seem dangerous and wrong.

But there was something else happening at the same time, of great consequence: the slow demise of morality itself, conceived as the moral bond linking individuals in the shared project of society.

In 1961, suicide ceased to be a crime. This might seem a minor and obviously humane measure, but it was the beginning of the end of England as a Christian country; that is, one in which Christian ethics was reflected in law. It was a prelude to other and more significant reforms. In 1967 abortion was legalised, as was homosexual behaviour.

Collectively these changes represented a decisive move away from the idea that society had, or was entitled to have, a moral code at its base, covering many areas of life that might otherwise be regarded as private. Society was no longer conceived of in terms of a moral consensus. The law would intervene only to prevent individuals from harming one another.

What happens when we lose moral consensus? Morality is reduced to taste. “Good” and “bad” become like yum and yugh: I like this; I don’t like that. Imagine two people, one of whom says: “I like ice cream”; the other: “I don’t”. They are not arguing. Each is simply declaring his or her taste.

We have lost the basis of morality as a shared set of values holding society together. We are living “after virtue”; that is to say, in an age in which people no longer have roles and duties within a stable social structure. When that happens, morality becomes a mere façade. Arguments become interminable and intolerable. The only adequate answer to an opposing viewpoint is: “Says who?” In a debate in which there are no shared standards, the loudest voice wins. The only way to defeat opponents is to ridicule them.

If there is no agreed moral truth, we cannot reason together. All truth becomes subjective or relative, no more than a construction, a narrative, one way among many of telling the story. Each represents a point of view, and each point of view is the expression of a group. On this account, Western civilisation is not truth but the hegemony of the ruling elite. Therefore, it must be exposed and opposed. Western civilisation becomes the rule of dead white males. There are other truths: Marxist, feminist, homosexual, African-American, and so on. Which prevails will depend not on reason but on power. Force must be met by force. Lacking a shared language, we attack the arguer, not the argument.

This is done by ruling certain opinions out of order, not because they are untrue – there is no moral truth – but because they represent an assault on the dignity of those who believe otherwise. So: Christians are homophobic. People on the Right are fascist. Those who believe in the right of Jews to a state are racist. Those who believe in traditional marriage are heterosexist. Political correctness, created to avoid stigmatising speech, becomes the supreme example of stigmatising speech.

One example: in 1957 the Wolfenden committee, then the cutting-edge of liberalism, declared that homosexual behaviour was a sin, but should not be a crime. In 2004, Rocco Buttiglione, a minister in the Italian Government, was chosen by the President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, to be its justice commissioner. During questioning, he acknowledged that, as a Catholic, he believed that homosexual behaviour is a sin but should not be a crime. He was then disqualified from taking up office as his private moral convictions were “in direct contradiction of European law”. He described this as the “new totalitarianism”.

Right or wrong, one thing is clear: the new tolerance is far less permissive than the old intolerance.

So a series of events that began in the 1960s fundamentally changed the terms of society and moral debate. Until recently, serious thinkers argued that society depends on moral consensus. Without that, there is no such thing as society, merely the clamour of competing voices and the clash of conflicting wills. This view began to crumble with the rise of individualism. People began to see morality in terms of personal autonomy, existential choice or the will to power. If morality is private, there is no logic in imposing it on society by legislation.

But if there is no moral truth, there is only victory. The pursuit of truth mutates into the will to power. Instead of being refuted by rational argument, dissenting views are stigmatised as guilty of postmodernism’s cardinal sin: racism in any of its myriad, multiplying variants. So moral consensus disappears and moral conversation dies. Opponents are demonised. Ever-new “isms” are invented to exclude ever more opinions. New forms of intimidation begin to appear: protests, threats of violence, sometimes actual violence. For when there are no shared standards, there can be no conversation, and where conversation ends, violence begins.

The divides that had driven politics hitherto, especially class and wealth, became less salient after the 1960s. Other, more “lifestyle” issues took their place. At first these were construed in terms of the individual, but eventually they came to be framed in terms of groups: first Jews, then African-Americans, then women, then gays. It was not merely that these groups sought equal rights. The real change was that they defined themselves as oppressed. This was a seismic shift.

Identity politics is deeply and inexorably divisive. If the withholding of recognition is a form of oppression, then one way of achieving recognition is to show that I have been oppressed. The logic is as follows: the group to which I belong is a victim; it has been wronged; therefore we are entitled to special treatment. This gives rise to an endlessly proliferating list of the aggrieved. Each of their claims is surely true, but you cannot build a free society on the basis of these truths, just as you cannot heal trauma by endlessly attending to your wounds. A culture of victimhood sets group against group, each claiming that its pain, injury, oppression, humiliation, is greater than that of others.

Ours is a transitional age, as revolutionary as the move from agriculture to industry. The growth of computing, the internet and satellite television will change life as much as any epoch-making development in the past.

With the new technologies the idea of an autonomous national culture disintegrates. Until recently, national cultures were predicated on the idea of a canon, a set of texts that everyone knew. In the case of Britain they included the Bible, Shakespeare and the great novels. The existence of a canon is essential to a culture. It means that people share a set of references and resonances, a public vocabulary of narratives and discourse. Until the early 1950s a politician could quote the Bible and expect people to know what he was alluding to. No longer.

As long as there were newspapers and a small number of radio and television news networks, people were exposed to a variety of views. Today we attend to only those media we choose; we focus only on the stories that interest us. If we see the world one way we will watch al-Jazeera; if another, we will watch Fox. We can filter out the voices with which we disagree. We are exposed to a selectively edited version of reality.

This is massively amplified by the phenomenon of blogs, which often present the news in highly tendentious ways. The result is that our prejudices are confirmed, and need never be disturbed.

The new technologies, by uniting people globally, divide people locally. They strengthen nonnational affiliations. They can make people feel more Hindu or Muslim or Jewish than British. They turn ethnic minorities into “diasporas”, people whose home and heart is elsewhere.

The nation state was brought into being by one form of communications technology – printing. It is today endangered by another. Whether the media, or politicians, or we, will recognise the danger in time, no one can be sure. Without a national culture, there is no nation. There are merely people-in-proximity. Whether this is sufficient to generate loyalty, belonging and a sense of the common good is an open question. National cultures make nations. Global cultures may yet break them.

The Triumph of the Stupids

Today I am ashamed to be British and I am ashamed of my country.

The nation that gave the world Newton, Alexander Fleming and Darwin and visionaries like Robert Stephenson and Charles Merz has today become a primitive backwater where the Cult of Equality has replaced science and rationalism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:British_scientists

It is self evidently true that all men are not created equal.

I am not my brother and nor am I my sister.

To deny me my right to difference is to deny me my individuality.

As William Blake wrote ' One law for the Lion and the and the Ox is oppression'.

As Plato wrote " When equality is given to unequals the result is inequality ".

In Mind, Body, Soul and Spirit all Men differ.

In their appreciation of art, beauty, nature and the divinity of life itself, all Men differ.

Where one man may see a heaven in a flower, another may regard a field of wild flowers as useful only for the plow.

The hounding of the scientist James Watson from our shores is a sign that our nation has reached its nadir.

The dark satanic mills of political correctness that grind down truth and replace it with dogma have transformed our nation from a place where the light of science once illuminated the world, to a cesspit of stupidity, irrationalism and cowardice.

It is not the tribal peoples of the world who are the primitives, it is us.

In the grip of our mindless superstitions such as political correctness, the witch doctors of the cult of equality place their spells on anyone who dares defy them and their idiotic edicts and the zombie like masses then treat them as tabooed.

The ultimate spell is to be labelled a 'racist'.

Like the phantoms and ghosts of the past the merest hint that the spectre of Institutional Racism afflicts an organisation then the CRE Witchdoctor is called in so that the place can be exorcised with the powers of Positive Discrmination and Affirmative Action.

In a complete reversal of centuries of scientific progress the absence of evidence of institutional racism is not regarded as evidence of absence of institutional racism, but as evidence that the institution is so racist that it hides its racism.

Its a bit like a WitchFinder General saying ' We think you are a witch, and because we have not found any evidence to prove you are a witch this merely confirms that you are a clever witch and therefore demand extra punishmnent '.

It is complete bollocks and the people who promote this shit, and who accept this shit, are insane.

In less than a couple of generations we have turned the clock back to an era before the Enlightenment,and we have entered an era where the irrational rules and the stupids have triumphed.

Today the stupids run the country.

The mewling maggot filth of the media that condition and brainwash the masses ensure that the rule of the stupids is ensured. When a man with a mind, a free thinking and visionary mind, dares reveal the stupidity of the stupids then all the stupids come together to destroy him.

It is like watching a swarm of ants devour a lion. On their own they are nothing, not even an irritant to the lion, but when they swarm as one then even the lion is unable to fight them. The swarming stupids then bite and sting the lion until it flees. Just as James Watson has fled the country.

Museum after museum refused to allow James Watson to speak. No douby David Lammy the Culture Minister and his arse licking minions were on the phones to the museums threatening to refuse them government funding in the future if they allowed James Watson to speak.

Today the various newspapers and their stupids who wrote the articles attacking James Watson are once again on the attack.

Whenever a wolf enters a village then all the village dogs run indoors and hide. When the wolf has left the village then all the dogs come out howling and barking from their houses and then form a pack and then they all take a piss on the paw prints of the wolf left in the mud. This is what the media are doing today as James Watson flies back to the United States.

They are howling and barking and pissing on his footprints.

Not one of the media maggots that attacked James Watson, nor the idiotic so called 'scientists' they managed to scrape up from the shallow end of the scientific brain pool to attack him, dared confront him in a free and fair public debate.

Instead they all just howled when he left the country and continue pissing on his prints in the mud. What a complete bunch of gutless bastards.

The inane so called 'scientific arguments' the 'scientists' and the media stupids are trying to promote today in order to conceal the fact they are a bunch of gutless bastards are so trite, facile and pathetic that it is just embarassing.

Our entire society is based upon Race - Multi-Culturalism regards race as a factor in everything we do as a society.

The Race Relations Act covers every function of every public body and our every private act. The RRA 1976 has achieved what Communism never did in our society, it has removed the right of private property. If you run your own company then you can be forced under the RRA 1976 to employ people the government tells you too. If you fail to employ those people then this can be used as evidence against you in an Employment Tribunal case as evidence of Institutional Racism and leave you open to unlimited fines for racism.

The Public Order Act 1986 criminalises language that the government regards as 'racist'.

The Race Relations Acts case law such as Mandla V Lee explictly recognises racial groups and ethnic groups - yet the Socialist scientists stil tell us that Race as a genetic construct does not exist.

For instance ;

Here we have an article concerning medical care provision based on assessment of racial group needs -

http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov/MeetingAbstracts/102273726.html

but here we have scientists saying that race does not exist -

http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?click_id=31&art_id=vn20021217112750970C124344&set_id=1

THESE PEOPLE ARE COMPLETELY INSANE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

These people say " Race is a real cultural, political and economic concept in society, but it is not a biological concept ".

LIFE IS A BIOLOGICAL CONCEPT - Race is an aspect of human biological existence, and to say that race as a biological concept or genetic concept does not exist is tautological nonsense. Every human being is a DNA based life form based on genetic inheritance. Therefore race is also an a priori genetic reality. If race exists as a factor in human social relations then race must exist as a genetic reality.

The outward visible manifestations of race such as skin colour and physiological differences are the basis of the reality of race as a social factor in human relations. Without those visible manifestations of race such as skin colour then the social, economic and political concepts of race could not impact within human societies. As those outward manifestations of Race are based on D.N.A, such as inherited skin colour, physiological differences and IQ differences relating to success in society, then race is both a social concept and a biological concept.

Skin colour and human physiological differences are the basis of the differences in social, economic and political differences in human societies.

Skin colour and phsyiological differences are both genetic based and inherited.

Any society that identifies a racial group as existing in that society as a social, economic and political reality must accept that a biological basis exists for the existence of that group within that society.

It is logically impossible to deny the biological existence of race when you accept the social existence of race.

Society and science can only deny that races exist if they deny humanity exists.

The fact that scientists seek to remove the reality of race from a biological perspective does not make them correct, it merely means that they are idiots.

If Race exists in any form, then it exists.

That existence is predicated upon a variety of differences between people INCLUDING genetics.

The concept of racism denies the genetic reality of race and then uses the social concept of race to remove our rights, remove our free speech and criminalise debate and at the exact same time the scientists tell us race does not exist.

This is schizophrenia on a huge scale, our entire society is psychotic and then we wonder why rates of mental illness, depression, drug taking and drinking are on the rise. People that live in an insane society are driven insane.

The fact is that the science of racial differences is the most retarded science.

Any scientist with any intelligence realises that researching racial differences is like playing hopscotch blindfolded in a minefield.

Researching racial differences kills careers.

Just as once questioning the Bible was enough to have someone labelled a heretic and cast in to the flames of the Inquisition, the same is true today of the science of racial differences.

There has been virtually ZERO research on race.

The fact that any research at all exists is because a few brave pioneers have dared to defy the Torquemadas of the Inquisiton and seek Truth instead of being shackled by superstition.

The research that has been discovered has proved that race exists on a genetic level in a myriad of ways.

The trite statement by the media maggots that we are all the same as we are all 99.9% genetically similar is more nonsense.

There are at least 3 billion seperate pieces of DNA in a single human being. There are 25,000 - 30,000 plus genes in the human DNA.

Chlorophyll is similar in structure to haemoglobin, but with magnesium instead of iron as the reactive part of the molecule. Just a single letter of DNA is the difference between haemoglobin and Chlorophyll. That is just one letter in the 3 billion in the human genome. Yet the difference between the two chemicals is vast.

This is what happens in complex systems like human beings. Tiny differences on an infinitisimally small scale have vast effects. A point one (.1 ) difference in DNA between human racial groups in a system with three billion segments of code is a vast amount of difference, and seeing as a single letter can have vast effects on the functions of the entire system itself then racial differences are vast between human beings.

The vast amount amount of inherited phsyiological differences between human racial groups such as externally visible traits, primarily skin color, features of the face, and the shape and size of the head and body, and the underlying skeleton are all evidence of vast racial differences between human races.

Even the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, who are frequently quoted as rejecting the idea of Race accept that racial differences exist.

http://www.physanth.org/positions/race.html

Race exists and villifying scientists such as James Watson FOR TELLING THE TRUTH is how our society is being destroyed within.

Before a civilisation is destroyed from without, it must first be destroyed from within.

Those in the media who attacked Watson, the pseudo-scientists that deny racial difference, and the stalinist socialist scum that want to remove our rights to debate and free speech racial differences are the inner enemy.

They must be confronted and defeated if we are to save our country.


http://www.amazon.com/Race-Reality-Differences-Vincent-Sarich/dp/0813340861 http://inverted-

world.com/index.php/feature/feature/the_reality_of_racial_differences

BBC Funds Terrorism and Tories Apologists for Terrorism

Two great stories in the Telegraph today. The first is entitled ‘ BBC Film Paid for Terror Suspects’ and concerns the BBC documentary ’Don’t Panic I’m Islamic’ which was an attempt by the BBC to brainwash’ the British public into believing that the problem of Islamist terrorists in the UK was just hype by the media.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/newswatch/ukfs/hi/newsid_4090000/newsid_4096400/4096426.stm

The BBC paid Mohammed Hamid, who also called himself Osama Bin London, to take part in a days paintballing where he and his Islamist terrorist chums wore masks, shot at cardboard cut outs of people and practised war games whilst the Mirandas and Quentins on the BBC production team went around filming them.

Along with Mousa Brown and Mohammed al-Figari, and 13 others, the BBC paid for them with license fee payers money to have a nice day out before they began blowing up London.

In a few weeks time the BBC will also be airing ‘ Don’t Scram, I’m in the Klan’ where they take a party of Ku Klux Klan members from America to Hyde Park in London and get B&Q to deliver a wooden cross a 100 foot high and light it for the benefit of the people walking in the park. This will be shown on the BBC whilst the clan members tell us why they are misunderstood and that they must be tolerated and that their extremism is a result of the oppression of the racist American government run by Israel and because of racist Jews who run the world. I am of course, being facetious as all white extremists are de-humanised, sub-human scum who must never be treated as in any way as being human. Unlike Islamic terrorists of course, these in the eyes of the BBC deserve to be understood, empathised with and awarded with license payers cash.

In the eyes of the BBC the Islamists must be allowed to blame the Jews in America, the Jews in Israel and the Jews in the British media for their terrorism. The BBC also blames the US for Al-Qaeda attacking the Twin Towers on 911, that Mossad may have been in charge of the planes that hit the buildings and that Palestinian suicide bombers must be empathised with and not condemned and that the Muslims of the world are the victims of violence ( by Israel and the US ) and not the aggressors.

Its funny as the Islamists filmed by the BBC, and the BBC itself, sound almost identical to the Muslims in the Conservative Muslim Forum.

Hamid was the person who recruited the 21/7 bombers who just a week later would try and blow up a series of tube trains and buses in London. Four days before the bombing attempts Hamid brought along two of the 21/7 bombers for another day of Jihadist Paintballing, Mohammed and Hussain Osman.

So the BBC in its fervent desire to act as an apologist for the Islamists terrorists threatening the UK decided to ;

1) Commission a BBC documentary that tried to ensure that anyone who was speaking out about Islamist terrorism in the UK was depicted as an ’Islamaphobe’

2) Commission a documentary that gave a false view of the nature of the Islamists in our midst and that tried to brainwash the public into believing the BBC bullshit that WE, and not the Islamists, were the problem.

3) Pay the bombers license fee money which probably went into the coffers of other Islamist terrorists threatening the UK. Yet again good old ’Auntie Beeb’ has cocked up. During the Cold War the BBC employed just about every Communist spy in the country at one time or the other.

Now during the war against Islamist terrorism it employs the apologists for Islamist terrorism, the supporters of Islamist terrorism and the actual perpetrators of Islamist terrorism. There are those who say the BBC is an ’institution’ and that we should treasure it. I say that is complete bollocks.

The BBC is one of the most pernicious mechanisms of social and political brainwashing ever invented. Look at the amount of crap they put on the BBC about ’Climate Change’ and how they promote every spring that melts the ice in Antartica as evidence of global warming. The BBC is a pernicious and poisonous organisation. On one hand whilst it preaches to everyone about its latest moral crusade, it is busy defrauding the people gullible enough to ring its phone quiz shows and donate money to shows like Blue Peter.

The endless ongoing series of scandals about the BBC and its greedy parasitic controllers and staff reveals just how corrupt this ’venerable’ institution is. The fact that anyone still thinks the BBC has any integrity at all, as per its reporting and its propaganda, is merely evidence of just how brainwashed the British public are.

Who is the bigger idiot - the BBC, or the mugs and saps that still believe what the BBC tell them and who still carry on throwing their money at its scams.


Tory Muslims Group Think Iran should be able to have nuclear bombs.

The next article in the Telegraph of interest is ‘ Muslim Tories ; Iran has a Right’ where a Muslim body set up by David Cameron to advise the Tory Party on Muslim issues has criticised Britain as being too close to Israel ( usually this phrase is used an a euphemism for being under the control ‘of the Jews’ ) and that Israels treatment of the Palestinians is the cause of Islamic terrorism around the world ( an Al Qaeda propagandist position ) and have also said that Iran has a legitimate reason for wanting to acquire nuclear weapons in order to defend itself from a nuclear armed Israel ( also an Islamist propaganda position ).

Though Israel has never threatened to wipe Iran off of the map with its Nuclear bombs, the fact that Iran has threatened to wipe Israel off the map when it gets a nuclear bomb is irrelevant to these Muslims in the Tory Party Muslim group.

The Muslim group is run and funded by Lord Sheikh a Tory Party donor and a Tory peer, rewarded with a peerage after being a party donor in 2005. He was recently named as one of the 100 most influential people on the political right in the UK.

In his speech to the Northampton Muslim Council on the 19th November 2006 , Lord Sheikh wrote “The Muslim community is diverse and Muslims have come here from different parts of the world. Despite this we should all have the concept of Umah and the Brotherhood of Islam “.

The word Ummah is an Arabic word that comes from Ummah Wahida in the Koran and it means One Community or One Nation and indicates that Muslims belong to the Nation of Islam and not just the British nation state.

The word Umah is either used to indicate the Pan-Arabic Nationalism version of the Ummah, a coalition of Islamic nation states or the global version of the Islamic community where nations are replaced with the Global Caliphate. In the Islamist version of the global Ummah then Sharia law would be the basis of the law and all non-Muslims kept under Dhimmitude status.

By explicitly linking the various Islamic faith sub-sets, Islamic nations around the world and Muslims from various nations who are present in Britain into the singularity of the Brotherhood of Islam and unity under the Ummah, then Lord Sheikh is creating the foundation for a situation of Dhimmitude for non-Muslims.

As a lawyer he knew what he was talking about when he gave the speech. Lord Sheikh then goes on to explicitly reject extremism and violence, but the fact is that the concept of the Umah as a trans-national global caliphate is the central dynamic of Jihad in the world today.

It is also the basis of the demand for Sharia law to be imposed by various Islamist extremist groups in the UK. By using a term, and defining that term in the way he did, it implies that for Lord Sheikh that Muslims in the UK form a single community and that everyone else is outside that community. That regardless of whether the Muslim is Sunni, Shi-ite or Sufi or any of the smaller sub-sets, they form one community and all non-Muslims are outside that community.

One cannot just talk about the Umah and not clarify ones definition of it. In relation to the use of the word Umah by Lord Sheikh in the speech, the reference cannot refer too ;

1) the Pan-Arabic Nationalist version of the Umah

2) the union of various Islamist states into an Umah of Islamic nations Therefore it can only refer too;

3) the Umah of the global caliphate which is based on Sharia Law

4) the Umah of all UK Muslims forming a separate community within the British nation

Option 1 is obviously not what he was referring too, option 2 is also not what he was referring too, option 3 is still open as an option or finally option 4. Option 4 is the basis of the beginning of a dynamic leading to separatism leading to eventual Sharia law within the UK.

If Muslims form a separate community within the UK based solely on them being Muslims, and thereby existing as a unified community regardless of their racial, ethnic, sectarian and national backgrounds, then this means Lord Sheikh is saying that Muslims exist in a form of social separation from the rest of the British people. That Muslims form a single community, and all other peoples, religions and groups either form a single community of being non-Muslims or they form their own community groups and that there is no such thing as British society, just a series of separate communities existing in the geographic region of Britain. This is the basic assertion of all those groups who demand the imposition of Sharia law in the UK for muslims.

He advocates Muslims join political parties to promote Islam, he advocates that Muslims get into Parliament to represent Islam and he advocated Muslims working together. The fact that a Muslim group exists within the Tory Party suggests that the interests of Muslims as group exist, and that as this group exists there are times when the interests of the group will conflict with the interests of the wider community.

Advocating that Iran be has an moral justification for being allowed to acquire nuclear weapons is an example when the interests of the Muslim Tory group conflict with the interests of the wider British community. It may be in the interest of Muslims as part of the Umah to have Iran armed with nuclear weapons, but in relation to the strategic and geo-political interests of the UK it is not in the interests of the UK to allow Iran to have nuclear weapons.

That strategic National Interest test should apply equally to both British Muslims and British Non-Muslims. If we are all part of one National Community as British citizens, then British Muslims should be putting the interests of Great Britain before that of the Umah. By saying that Muslim interests are not linked to British national security interests then they have placed the interests of themselves and their members outside the British state itself. They have placed their own interests as part of the Umah before that of the interests of the British Nation itself.

The fact that Muslims within the Tory Party are now explicitly calling for Iran to be allowed to have nuclear weapons is proof that the interests of the Umah, and the Muslims in the Muslim Tory Group, are not in accord with the interests of Great Britain. The fact that the Muslim group in the Tory Party are putting the interests of the Umah before the National Security interests of the UK is an alarming development.

If the Tory Party has allowed a Muslim group to develop within its own ranks that cannot separate the national security interests of the UK from the global interests of the Umah and Iran, then that is a disturbing development.

As Political Correctness infects the Tory Party then if the Tories ever stumbled into power then this would mean that they would be open to the charge of racism in their own ranks if they refused to bow down to the demands of the Muslim lobbyists in their own ranks.

Though Iran has said all along that it does not seek to acquire Nuclear Weapons, the fact is that if the Tories were in power then they would be under pressure from the Islamists in their ranks to allow Iran to develop them. The fact that the Muslim Tory group says that Iran is building nuclear weapons contradicts Iran saying its just wants nuclear power facilities.

Its good to know the Tories would allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. The fact is that if Iran wasn’t after nuclear weapons why did Iran pay A.Q. Khan 8 million dollars for the blueprints and equipment to build an nuclear bomb ?

The fact is that Iran wants a nuclear bomb and will use it on Israel.

Therefore any Muslim group, whether inside the Tory Party or outside it, that supports Irans right to acquire nuclear weapons or that sympathises with Irans development of nuclear weapons places itself in contradiction to the interests of the British state. It is not in the interest of the British state that millions of refugees have to flee Israel into Britain and Europe. It is not in the interest of the British nation that another Islamic nation develops and owns nuclear weapons. It is not in the interest of the British people that nuclear technology and materials may be passed to other Islamic terrorists. It is not in the interest of the British nation that under the aegis of nuclear weapons an army of united Arab nations launch a conventional war on Israel that they cannot defeat. It is not in the interests of the Uk that Iran is able to control the last of the worlds oil supplies via its control of Iraq via a proxy government of Shi-Ite militias and hold the West hostage via assymetric warfare. It is not in the interests of the West that Iran invades Saudi Arabia via a Shi-ite dominated Iraq and invades Kuwait and takes control of the Kuwait and Saudi oil wells and uses the threat to drop nuclear bombs on US troops to prevent the US retaliating. It is not in the interests of the West to have Iranian terrorists explode a nuclear bomb smuggled into Britain via a container port. Iran would not ever attack the US as the Americans would respond in kind, if the Iranians ever exploded a nuclear bomb in the UK they know that the British government would never retailiate as they are too weak to do so. Thats why we are the target for Iran and not the Americans. The Americans stil have big bollocks, whilst we are run by a bunch of effiminate liberal assholes. Thats why we are the real target for terrorists with nuclear weapons, not the US.

The fact that the Tory group puts the interests of the Umah, Muslims and Iran, before that of the British people and the British state is a sign that the Muslims in the Tory Group regard themselves as separate from the British state.

The fact the Conservative Muslim Forum is also demanding a rewriting of history to place Islam at the centre of British history and Western Civilisation and then to indoctrinate children with that propaganda in schools and that it believes that preachers who reject democracy as the basis of the British state should not be refused entry or deported from Britain shows how extreme this group is.

This group funded by Lord Sheikh and run from Tory Party central headquarters should be closed down and booted out of the Tory Party. It wont be though, as the Tories are so scared of being called racist they would rather allow the extremists to stay in their ranks than confront them. Imagine what would happen once the Tories are in power - and just how dangerous it would be to have a party as gutless and weak as the Tories dealing with Islamist terrorism. If they tolerate this, what else would they tolerate.

Musical Help for Indoctrinated Youth

Here are some download sites so you can listen to some decent music instead of that NME / UAF garbage.

Sigur Ros - http://www.sigur-ros.co.uk/media/

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=okLCurB1lJw

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=M9NEuDg-3eY

Nine Inch Nails 'Year Zero ' - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYkDw7HNaSw&mode=related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgq0_OqYkx4&mode=related&search=

Sea Sick Steve - http://www.seasicksteve.com/ and heres a live video http://www.seasicksteve.com/belladrum2006.htm

Hellyeah - http://www.hellyeahband.com/ and here http://www.hellyeahrocks.com/

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=0AGJxYt0mNs

Grizzly Bear - http://www.grizzly-bear.net/audio/

wolfmother - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKPPnGsdh0A&mode=related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZajUzLY--iQ&mode=related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWvdKPpVWzw&mode=related&search=

Stpehen Fretwell - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUpy4oexWqk

Damian Rice - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSD4Id_oazM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQySgbCIklk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONzuRSCZbls&mode=related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqdGHm79R_4&mode=related&search=

Slipknot - http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=qw4X4jMUqg0

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=b1K5cADZ6N4

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=97x0jZyOHts

Ian Brown - F.E.AR http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=V75ybmmoGMs

White Zombie - http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=vYQI61jjOrI

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=LXpbrGBIGxw

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=bJ9RrHMTTbw

Iggy Pop - http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=IbLRf0j80wU

Black Flag - http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=hFF7jzVfSB0

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=sjVZaZ4o6_4