tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post1477681168409253576..comments2023-11-05T00:38:56.097-07:00Comments on 21st Century British Nationalism: The Tale of the TurtlesDefender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-14157209979697506792007-09-15T08:12:00.000-07:002007-09-15T08:12:00.000-07:00Perhaps you should join the party andromeda and th...Perhaps you should join the party andromeda and then you would know what is going on and then would not have to talk a load of rubbish about things you know nothing about - eg what people are doing for mark walker.<BR/><BR/>If you really think it would help people for us to let what our opponents know what we are doing all the time - then you have no understanding either of tactics, strategy or British politics.Defender of Libertyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-67790727905351735752007-09-13T04:48:00.000-07:002007-09-13T04:48:00.000-07:00Racism is now a term of abuse used against anyone ...Racism is now a term of abuse used against anyone who gives offence, whether intentionally or unintentionally, about other races or when someone treats different races differently and misjudges the situation. The "institutional racism" of the police, a phrase coined by Lord McPherson, is the grandiloquent and politically explosive term used to describe mere police incompetence and lazy thinking. <BR/> <BR/>Traditionally, racism only meant the actual belief that some races are superior or inferior to others.<BR/> <BR/>It is quite clear that nobody, not even the government, knows what it really means. <BR/> <BR/>Even the BNP does not know its own mind about whether it is a racist political party or not. Quite a few of their supporters are confused about whether they are or not (for some deny that they are racist and have friends who are non-white) and do not know whether to deny their racism or embrace it. Are they merely xenophobic (ie fearful of foreigners of any hue and nation, which is still allowed) or actually racist, whatever that means?<BR/> <BR/>Does excluding someone from your party on grounds of race mean that you think they are inferior and that you are superior? Or is that just invoking the principle of free association?<BR/> <BR/>Does disliking the physical and cultural characteristics of another race (who is perceived to be doing better or worse than you because of their alleged racial or cultural characteristics) mean you are racist? Or does racism actually require you to believe in your/their superiority/inferiority?<BR/> <BR/>Does believing that another race is superior to yours (and praising that race) racism?<BR/> <BR/>The law is undecided. On the one hand it criminalises discrimination on grounds of race, on the other it allows the BNP and NF (who wish to repatriate non-whites) to exist. <BR/> <BR/>Much could be accomplished by the BNP if they started an action in defamation the next time a national publication that is worth suing describes a member of the BNP as racist. A case for libel is made out when a litigant proves to the satisfaction of a jury that, as a result of words published or broadcast, he has been brought into hatred, ridicule and contempt in the minds of right-thinking members of society. <BR/> <BR/>This could run and run, folks! <BR/> <BR/>Will the BNP do us all a public service and get us a legal definition of racism? Will they, hell! <BR/> <BR/>What are they for, I keep asking, if they do not even defend the members of their own party (and race) who are oppressed by Political Correctness - the ones who get unfairly or constructively dismissed from their jobs or expelled from their unions after going public about their BNP membership, the most recent of which is Mark Walker? <BR/> <BR/>Answers on a postcard, please.Claire Khawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-54017087927789438442007-09-11T01:49:00.000-07:002007-09-11T01:49:00.000-07:00Parents of illegitimate children should receive NO...Parents of illegitimate children should receive NO child benefit. That would stop the bastards from taking over and encourage the female bastard breeders to give up their babies to adoption agencies who will place them with adoptive parents who have the resources and will to bring them up properly. <BR/><BR/>Or do you think that is a little harsh?Claire Khawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-87745225059870445332007-09-10T07:25:00.000-07:002007-09-10T07:25:00.000-07:00how about spending the £200 fitting them with a co...how about spending the £200 fitting them with a contraecptive implant instead ?Defender of Libertyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-76913420779427815132007-09-10T07:10:00.000-07:002007-09-10T07:10:00.000-07:00VOTE: Should pregnant women be given as much as £2...VOTE: Should pregnant women be given as much as £200 to eat healthily? <BR/><BR/>The latest manifestation of national marble loss is the astonishing proposal by Health Minister Alan Johnson to give as much as £200 to every pregnant woman to induce her to eat healthily. It seems taxes are to be taken from the married and the working (who will already be aware of the basics of healthy eating) and given to CHAV and never-married, under-achieving, non-working, welfare-claiming teen mums so that their delinquent little bastards (who are now increasingly likely to be shooting and stabbing our children) will have a healthier start in life. <BR/><BR/>Do we really need Gordon Brown to misuse tax money in this way just because he wants to show us that he cares? <BR/> <BR/>Visit <BR/><BR/>www.1party4all.co.uk<BR/><BR/>and vote!Claire Khawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11557436240917008429noreply@blogger.com