tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56807719688885287262024-03-05T18:56:37.830-08:0021st Century British NationalismCognitive Dissidence, The mechanism of warfare and subversion for intellectual revolutionaries.Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.comBlogger3870125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-3635769285875188592015-02-15T01:30:00.003-08:002015-02-15T01:59:02.089-08:00Rotherham Rapes Template
correspondence@equalityhumanrights.com
<blockquote></blockquote>
Please could you send me information re the EHRC's response to the recent expose of the Rotherham Rapes scandal ;
<blockquote></blockquote>
1) Has the EHRC begun an investigation into the Rotherham Rapes issue ?<blockquote></blockquote>
2) Has the EHRC investigated the racial aspects of the cases, eg the targeting of white children by non-whites ?<blockquote></blockquote>
3) Has the EHRC any plans to issue guidance to the police / councils/ social services across the UK to protect white British children at risk of similar rape gangs ?<blockquote></blockquote>
4) When will the EHRC begin an investigation into the Rotherham Rapes as required under their duties under the Race Relations Acts in order to protect white children at risk of rape by ethnic non-white gangs ?<blockquote></blockquote>
FREEDOM OF INVESTIGATION REQUEST.<blockquote></blockquote>
1) Under the FOI act I would like all ;<blockquote></blockquote>
a) internal EHRC correspondence as regards issues relating to the Rotherham rapes scandal<blockquote></blockquote>
b) all correspondence between EHRC staff and government ministers, civil servants etc relating to the Rotherham rapes <blockquote></blockquote>
c) all correspondence by EHRC staff with any third party agencies, charities, organisations etc relating to the Rotherham Rapes<blockquote></blockquote>
d) all information, internal e mails etc relating to EHRC investgations, reports, meeting relating to reports of the racial targeting of white children and young people for rapes by non-whites and ethnic gangs.<blockquote></blockquote>
Thank you,
<blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-67251396211437037052014-11-09T03:25:00.001-08:002014-11-09T03:44:45.017-08:00The Communion Cup
<blockquote></blockquote>
Kneel now my son, in snow, sand, dust and mud,<blockquote></blockquote>
And sip from wars cold communion cup.<blockquote></blockquote>
The warm wine runs red as poppy blush, <blockquote></blockquote>
And flows from countless open wounds.<blockquote></blockquote>
The bread is broken with bullets and bombs,<blockquote></blockquote>
And swallowed by so many shallow graves.<blockquote></blockquote>
Watch as the fallen now rise anew, reborn,<blockquote></blockquote>
Whilst we linger in the silences they leave behind.
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-25291348014656153322014-06-04T06:00:00.002-07:002014-06-04T06:18:04.772-07:00Of God And Mothers.
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjiqo-PQNW5pDWgyigu_u7NaVnYivQ5_yAGWrTpBofAUwKI6-Pndelr8PQlOUStUWdO6zTvBmkJkNcgdNOeBGDdq2mwK2azkCH5tY7Kv3LiPhrx22FzFjnCUyJ2CbPLrsnmdfQ0IQUg1abM/s1600/trrops-heading-to-normandy-beach.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjiqo-PQNW5pDWgyigu_u7NaVnYivQ5_yAGWrTpBofAUwKI6-Pndelr8PQlOUStUWdO6zTvBmkJkNcgdNOeBGDdq2mwK2azkCH5tY7Kv3LiPhrx22FzFjnCUyJ2CbPLrsnmdfQ0IQUg1abM/s320/trrops-heading-to-normandy-beach.jpg" /></a></div>
1) <blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
A red tide of war arises upon reasons fatal fluxion, <blockquote></blockquote>
Waves black with boats, a mass of guns and iron,<blockquote></blockquote>
Holds filled with boys and men getting ready to rush upon body choked beaches,<blockquote></blockquote>
Trembling with fear, they pray for Gods mercy or cry for their mothers.<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
2) <blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
It is dawn on D-Day and a dark day of atonement has now begun,<blockquote></blockquote>
Its perilous birth baptised in fonts of blood, sweat and tears, <blockquote></blockquote>
Where a hymn of hope, soft as a soldiers dying sigh, now eternally renews,<blockquote><blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
Amidst the wrecks and wave tangled wracks left by the ever turning tide. <blockquote><blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-81895606793139353392014-03-15T01:31:00.001-07:002014-03-15T01:34:37.094-07:00The Right Spectrum
<blockquote></blockquote>
The continual call of The Right Sector as Far Right / Fascist / Uktra-Nationalist / Nazi / Nationalist etc prove that the media do not have a clue as to what either The Right Sector stand for politically or where they sit on the Nationalist spectrum.
<blockquote></blockquote>
I define below where most Right parties and movements sit. <blockquote></blockquote>
The Right Spectrum is based on two forces Revolution and Reaction. One the Far Left we see the Socialist & Nationalist anti-corporate and anti-Imperialist impulse and the Far Right is designated by an Imperialist and Corporate impulse. <blockquote></blockquote>
This allows us to place nationalist political parties and movements on a Left to Right scale based on Left Nationalist Revolutionary ideology to Reactionary Right ideology.<blockquote></blockquote>
We shall start on the Left of the Right Spectrum.
<blockquote></blockquote>
<b>A) Social Nationalist - eg Strasserite Left Revolutionary Social Nationalists. Anti-corporate, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist and nationalist. <blockquote></blockquote>
B) National Socialism - the original ideology of the NSDAP in Germany prior to the expulsion of the National Socialist left by Hitler. Had its origins in a fusion of the Left & Right. <blockquote></blockquote>
C) Conservatism - we can place this at the centre point of the spectrum. Do not confuse Conservatism with the Conservative Party in Britain, as the latter is now a social democratic party. Some conservatives seek to preserve things as they are, emphasizing stability and continuity, while others, called reactionaries, oppose modernism and seek a return to "the way things were ". The Conservatives who want things to remain stable are on the left of the Conservative wing, usually called 'the wets' or Red Tories and those who are the Dries, whose policies which came to be labelled as "dry" ones included foremostly reducing public spending, cutting taxes, lowering interest rates, tightly controlling the money supply, and reducing the regulatory power of the state – all policies which were closely associated with Thatcher. <blockquote></blockquote>
D) Paleo-Conservatism - emphasis on tradition, limited government, civil society, anti-colonialism and anti-federalism, along with religious, regional, national and Western identity. <blockquote></blockquote>
E) Nationalism - traditional nationalism relates to a protection of the people and the nation. Though the nation and people are seen as a unity, this is not based solely on an ethnic definition of the citizens of that nation. Those who are loyal to the nation are seen as one with the nation. Unlike Cultural Nationalism, which says only those who are culturally integrated into the nation and its culture can be members of the nation, nationalism allows other cultures to exist within the nation state as long as their loyalty is to the nation and the people of the nation itself - and not some other nation or their own ethnic interests. <blockquote></blockquote>
F) Cultural Nationalism - as this does not explicitly relate to ethnic interests, it sits between Paleo-Conservatism & Ethnic Nationalism on the spectrum. Though the fact that it demands cultural integration and excludes those who may be loyal to the nation even though they are not culturally integrated means it sits on the right of the spectrum to Nationalism. <blockquote></blockquote>
G) Ethnic Nationalism - as its focus relates to the protection and promotion of ethnic and cultural interests, it sits on the Right of the spectrum. <blockquote></blockquote>
H) Fascism - Fascism was the merger of the State & the corporations. Hence its union with the corporations ensured the pre-dominance of corporate interests took precedence over the socialist impulse within Fascism. Hence it has to be placed in the Reactionary Right section of the spectrum. Fascism can also be imperialist. <blockquote></blockquote>
I) Neo-Conservatism - this is included on the Far Right spectrum due to its imperialist, militarist, supra-national scope as way to promote US corporate interests. The fact that the movement has as much loyalty to Israel as America, means that it cannot be included within the definition of a Nationalist movement. <blockquote></blockquote>
J) Hitlerism - Hitlerism is not National Socialism. It is fact the antithesis of National Socialism as it is the use of the State to profit the Capitalists and Industrialists via the use of war as a mechanism to increase corporate profits. Hitlerism was Supra-national in scope eg Greater German Reich & The New Order based on supra-national imperialist Pan-Aryanism.
<i></i></b><blockquote></blockquote>
So we can see that the placing of The Right Sector as a Fascist / Nazi / Hitlerite group is false.<blockquote></blockquote>
They fit squarely into the Nationalist bracket. <blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-23465769640553782482014-03-10T03:25:00.001-07:002014-03-10T05:13:45.416-07:00The Frankfurt School And The Truth
<blockquote></blockquote>
The origins of the Frankfurt School began with funding provided by the German Jewish Marxist Felix Weil.<blockquote></blockquote>
1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Weil<blockquote></blockquote>
Weil had been a student of the German Marxist proffessor Karl Korsch. Who was not Jewish.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Along with György Lukács, Karl Korsch is regarded as one of the major figures responsible for laying the groundwork for Western Marxism in the 1920s.<blockquote></blockquote>
1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Korsch<blockquote></blockquote>
<i>Karl Korsch was born in 1886 in Tostedt, near Hamburg in Germany. His father was a successful bank clerk and later a bank manager. Korsch went to school in Thuringia, and to university in Munich, Berlin, Geneva and Jena. Like Walter Benjamin, his first political experiences came as a member of the 'Free Student Movement', a broad, liberal and idealist organisation committed to the idea of transforming education in the interest of students. <blockquote></blockquote>
On the outbreak of war, in August 1914, Karl Korsch returned to Germany. He claimed to have served in the war, while openly expressing his opposition to it. For this, he was demoted from the rank of reserve lieutenant to corporal. Korsch boasted that he never carried a rifle or sabre. Somehow he survived the hostility of his own commanding officers, and was twice decorated with the Iron Cross, for acts of bravery under fire.</i><blockquote></blockquote>
2) http://www.dkrenton.co.uk/research/korsch.html<blockquote></blockquote>
The Frankurt School as it has come to be known, is actually The Institute For Social Research and was founded in 1923.
<blockquote></blockquote>
2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Social_Research<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
Its first head was Kurt Albert Gerlach. A German Marxist. Not a Jew. He died before the centre opened and was replaced by Carl Grunberg<blockquote></blockquote>
1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_Albert_Gerlach<blockquote></blockquote>
2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Gr%C3%BCnberg
<blockquote></blockquote>
Carl Grunberg was a German Marxist. He was Jewish.<blockquote></blockquote>
The idea of the centre and its origins are described here ;
<blockquote></blockquote>
1) http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School<blockquote></blockquote>
The Institute emerged from a week-long symposium held in Ilmenau, Germany in 1922. The First Marxist Workweek was organized and funded by German-Argentinean agricultural magnate Felix Weil with the purpose of combining the different trends of Marxism. The symposium was attended by Georg Lukács, Karl Korsch, Karl August Wittfogel, and Friedrich Pollock, among others. The event was reportedly so successful that Weil set about erecting a building and funding salaries for a permanent "Institute for Marxism" modeled upon the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow.<blockquote></blockquote>
In 1923, with the help of the German Communist Party, the Institute for Social Research was opened at Frankfurt University with Carl Grünberg as its first Director.<blockquote></blockquote>
The initial work at the Institute was oriented towards exploring Marxism as a scientific and economic methodology, but after the death of Grünberg and the temporary directorship of Pollock, Jewish Marxist Max Horkheimer was appointed the to the chair and changed the direction of the Institute from promoting an orthodox Marxist philosophy to what would later be called "cultural Marxism," better known as "political correctness." <blockquote></blockquote>
Cultural Marxism is also known Critical Theory ;
<blockquote></blockquote>
1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_theory<blockquote></blockquote>
Critical theory was first defined by Max Horkheimer of the Frankfurt School of sociology in his 1937 essay Traditional and Critical Theory: Critical theory is a social theory oriented toward critiquing and changing society as a whole, in contrast to traditional theory oriented only to understanding or explaining it. Horkheimer wanted to distinguish critical theory as a radical, emancipatory form of Marxian theory, critiquing both the model of science put forward by logical positivism and what he and his colleagues saw as the covert positivism and authoritarianism of orthodox Marxism and Communism
<blockquote></blockquote>
The ideological basis of critical theory comes from five Frankfurt School theoreticians: Herbert Marcuse, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Walter Benjamin, and Erich Fromm. Of these five only Adorno was not Jewish. All were Marxists.<blockquote></blockquote>
Modern critical theory has been influenced by György Lukács and Antonio Gramsci as well as the second generation Frankfurt School scholars, including Jürgen Habermas.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Lukacs was a Jewish Marxist. Gramsci an Italian Marxist.<blockquote></blockquote>
The current head of the Frankfurt School is Jurgen Habermas.<blockquote></blockquote>
Habermas is a German Marxist whose father was a Nazi supporter. He is not Jewish.<blockquote></blockquote>
1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%BCrgen_Habermas
<blockquote></blockquote>
So we can see from the above explanation of the Frankfurt School the following things ;<blockquote></blockquote>
<i>1) It was set up as a Marxist body to promote Marxism<blockquote></blockquote>
2) every one of its founders were German and Marxists.<blockquote></blockquote>
3) The aims of the organisation have always been to spread the ideas of Marxism into society.</i><blockquote></blockquote>
Therefore the contention that the organisation is Jewish and serves Jewish interests is clearly false.<blockquote></blockquote>
<b>The organsations leadership is not united by one race, one nationality or one religion.<blockquote></blockquote>
Its leadership is united by only one thing - their support for Marxism.<i></i></b><blockquote></blockquote>
Which should come as a shock to non-one as it is an organisation set to represent Marxism.<blockquote></blockquote>
Therefore we need to address two issues peddled by the White Nationalist movement that the Frankfurt School is a Jewish plot to destroy society and for Jews to control the West.<blockquote></blockquote>
This is clearly false.<blockquote></blockquote>
For a start the ideology spread by the Frankfurt School, Cultural Marxism, DOES NOT BENEFIT JEWS.<blockquote></blockquote>
The basis of the contemporary LIBERAL society is LIBERAL. As a result of Liberalism and assimilation pushed by Liberalism derived from Cultural Marxism, the Jewish community is slowly being misceginated out of existence ;
<blockquote></blockquote>
1) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26067980<blockquote></blockquote>
2) http://www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/IntermarriageWhyNot/<blockquote></blockquote>
3) http://www.alternet.org/story/142478/israeli_government_ads_warn_against_marrying_non-jews<blockquote></blockquote>
EVEN BENJAMIN NETANYAHUS SON IS DATING A NON-JEW ;<blockquote></blockquote>
1) http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2014/01/netanyahu-blasted-for-sons-non-jewish-girlfriend/<blockquote></blockquote>
It is Liberal Jews and Liberals who most oppose the most nationalistic and racist ideology supported by many Jews today - this being the racist Imperialist state of Israel and its Racist, Nationalistic, imperialistic ideology of Zionism.<blockquote></blockquote>
Even within Israel vast swathes of the Jewish population, from anti-Zionist Orthodox Jews to Left Wing Liberal Jews oppose both the actions of the Israeli state and Zionism.<blockquote></blockquote>
The Liberal values that these left wing Jews in Israel support find their origin in Cultural Marxism and the Frankfurt School.<blockquote></blockquote>
It can even be said that without the ideological influence on Israel and Jews by the Frankfurt School and its Critical Theory / Cultural Marxism, that the Zionist Likudist Far Right in Israel and America would have no political or social opposition groups to oppose them and their activities at all.<blockquote></blockquote>
The Liberal movement deriving from Cultural Marxism has been the primary fetter on the Eretz Israel Imperialist and Militarist expansionist policies of the Zionist Nationalist right.<blockquote></blockquote>
If liberal Jews like Gilad Atzmon, Noam Chomsky and many others did not oppose Zionism both in Israel and America then Zionism would would have undoubtedly achieved most of its ideological aims in Israel, America and in relation to its expansionist foreign policy.<blockquote></blockquote>
Now we need to look at why so many Jews in the 1920's and 1930's supported Marxism.<blockquote></blockquote>
Thats a pretty easy issue to explain.<blockquote></blockquote>
As a result of social, political and legal anti-Jewish and anti-semitic laws and violence many Jews across Europe saw Marxism as a mechanism to liberate themselves.<blockquote></blockquote>
This is why Jews both in Germany & Russia embraced Marxism. <blockquote></blockquote>
This iw why many Jews in Russia decided to embrace the Marxist Revolution that had swept Russia in 1917 and become either Bolsheviks or Mensheviks. <blockquote></blockquote>
Many Jews in Russia had embraced the Bolshevik Party early on and had formed a significant proportion of its membership ;<blockquote></blockquote>
1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolsheviks<blockquote></blockquote>
The average party member was very young. In 1907, 22% of Bolsheviks were under 20, 37% were 20-24 and 16% were 25-29. By 1905, 62% of the members were industrial workers (3% of the population in 1897
<blockquote></blockquote>
22% of Bolsheviks were gentry (1.7% of the total population), 38% were uprooted peasants, compared with 19% and 26% for the Mensheviks. In 1907 78.3% of the Bolsheviks were Russian and 10% were Jewish (34% and 20% for the Mensheviks). <blockquote></blockquote>
Total membership was 8,400 in 1905, 13,000 in 1906 and 46,100 by 1907 (8,400, 18,000, 38,200 respectively for the Mensheviks). By 1910 both factions together had fewer than 10,000 members.
<blockquote></blockquote>
But many Jews had also embraced the Menshevik Party as well. <blockquote></blockquote>
An important issue to note re the Russian Revolution is that the Mensheviks had a far higher proportion of Jewish membership than the Bolsheviks - 20 % of the Mensheviks as opposed to the Bolsheviks 10 %<blockquote></blockquote>
1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensheviks<blockquote></blockquote>
The primary opponents of the Bolsheviks WITHIN RUSSIA were the Mensheviks.<blockquote></blockquote>
Menshevism was finally made illegal after the Kronstadt Uprising of 1921.<blockquote></blockquote>
Therefore the idea that Jews ran the Bolsheviks and formed the majority of its membership is false.<blockquote></blockquote>
What is also false is that the Jews all supported the Bolsheviks.<blockquote></blockquote>
The primary party supported by Jews was the Mensheviks.<blockquote></blockquote>
The Mensheviks fought against the Bolsheviks in the Kronstadt Rebellion of 1921 and were banned as a a result ;<blockquote></blockquote>
The Kronstadt rebellion (Russian: Кронштадтское восстание, tr. Kronshtadtskoye vosstaniye) was a major unsuccessful uprising against the Bolsheviks in the later years of the Russian Civil War. Led by Stepan Petrichenko and consisting of Russian sailors, soldiers and civilians, the rebellion was one of the reasons for Vladimir Lenin's and the Communist Party's decision to loosen its control of the Russian economy by implementing the New Economic Policy (NEP).
<blockquote></blockquote>
1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kronstadt_Uprising
<blockquote></blockquote>
The Mensheviks were led by a Jew ;<blockquote></blockquote>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepan_Petrichenko<blockquote></blockquote>
So the leader of a major uprising against Lenin and the Bolsheviks was a Jewish Menshevik leading a Menshevik movement with a far higher number of Jews in it than the Bolsheviks.<blockquote></blockquote>
So the idea that Bolshevism was Jewish & supported by Jews is demonstrably false.<blockquote></blockquote>
Note that the Bolshevik Party with the smallest percentage of Jews in it, lost and the Bolsheviks won. <blockquote></blockquote>
So therefore the assertion that ;<blockquote></blockquote>
1) As the Frankfurt Schools had a high number of Jews in it that they served Jewish interests as opposed to Marxist interests is false.<blockquote></blockquote>
Jews in the early 20th century did not form a monolithic, cohesive bloc.
<blockquote></blockquote>
They were divided into Orthodox Jews, Nationalistic Zionist Jews and Communust Bolshevik, Menshevik and Liberal Marxist Jews. There were also atheist Jews, anarchist Jews and even fascist Jews such as the ones who supported Mussolini ;<blockquote></blockquote>
1) http://redroom.com/member/frank-sanello/writing/mussolini%E2%80%99s-jews-the-chosen-people-fascist-italy-rejected<blockquote></blockquote>
2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margherita_Sarfatti
<blockquote></blockquote>
Even Hitler had over 150,000 Jews fighting for Germany in WW2 ;<blockquote></blockquote>
1) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/museums/10682975/The-Jews-who-fought-for-Hitler-We-did-not-help-the-Germans.-We-had-a-common-enemy.html<blockquote></blockquote>
2) http://www.kansaspress.ku.edu/righit.html<blockquote></blockquote>
3) http://www.rense.com/general43/jewserved.htm
<blockquote></blockquote>
The soldier whose image of the ideal German Soldier used in Nazi magazines was also Jewish ;<blockquote></blockquote>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werner_Goldberg<blockquote></blockquote>
Even the Number 2 in the leadership of Himmlers SS was Jewish ;<blockquote></blockquote>
1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emil_Maurice <blockquote></blockquote>
Even the British Union Of Fascists led Sir Oswald Mosley had Jewish members and candidates in elections.<blockquote></blockquote>
So we can see that as far more Jews served in the German military for Hitler, then using the same logic of those who call the Frankfurt Schools 'Jewish' simply by counting Jews involved in the organisation, then using that exact same 'logic' that the Nazis and the Nazi movement were also Jewish and controlled by Jews.<blockquote></blockquote>
The idiocy of 'counting Jews' as the basis of an proposition that an organisation serve Jewish interests, is about an asinine methodology one can imagine. <blockquote></blockquote>
Jews are not The Borg from Star Trek. They do not share a Hive Mind nor do they all have a sense of ethno-communal loyalty only to their fellow Jews.<blockquote></blockquote>
In fact such ethno-communalism that does exist, can be exploited by criminals within the Jewish community. <blockquote></blockquote>
For an example of how some Jewish crooks can exploit Jewish ethno-communalism for their own advantage we need only to look at such criminals as ;<blockquote></blockquote>
1) http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/24/world/americas/24iht-24jews.18903457.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
<blockquote></blockquote>
2) http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2008/12/charities_old_people_jews_hit.html<blockquote></blockquote>
If the Frankfurt School was Jewish, then so too must have been the Fascists in Italy as many Jews in Italy supported, funded and were members of the Fascist movement. <blockquote></blockquote>
<b>THE PRIMARY POINT IS THIS - the Cultural Marxist movement that spawned Liberalism has not benefited the Jews in any way.<blockquote></blockquote>
It has led to the formation of the Jewish Left who oppose Zionist Nationalism.<blockquote></blockquote>
It has created the social dynamic towards Jewish assimilation that is misceginating much of the Jewish Community itself.<blockquote></blockquote>
It has created the myriad liberal social dysfunction such as the epidemic of drug abuse that kills many Jewish young people in the entertainment industry in particular eg Amy Winehouse. </b><blockquote></blockquote>
Cultural Marxism is as much a threat to Jewish social, political and ethnic communalism and genetic survival as it is to all those peoples exposed to it. <blockquote></blockquote>
<b>All the above information is based on facts.<blockquote></blockquote>
If you think you can refute it then try.<blockquote></blockquote>
If you are right, I will publish it.
<blockquote></blockquote>
<i></i></b>
Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-5211664980751859152014-03-07T06:04:00.000-08:002014-03-07T06:42:49.429-08:00The Great Femen Lie
<blockquote></blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnhsfycHCSvsGVcQCYNWc53EutII3BLY_xSuoU68swz_ej3GKHRiJvETZEPZLAaRi2gbp20_FtgGHOqh4lrRbUk-L8eETEFSvgngTJfyzK1ukhW5hXyAZX6CLh1IIGNdTxTt3MlPSUwRbm/s1600/flag+burn.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnhsfycHCSvsGVcQCYNWc53EutII3BLY_xSuoU68swz_ej3GKHRiJvETZEPZLAaRi2gbp20_FtgGHOqh4lrRbUk-L8eETEFSvgngTJfyzK1ukhW5hXyAZX6CLh1IIGNdTxTt3MlPSUwRbm/s320/flag+burn.jpg" /></a></div>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<b>Image - Femen activists burn the SALAFIST black battle flag of Islam outside the Grand Mosque in France. They have bigger balls than most nationalists<i></i></b>.<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
For years Nationalist have been told a series of systematic lies and propaganda that they believed uncritically. Like idiots we believed every lie. In fact we cheered them and welcomed them.
Its okay.<blockquote></blockquote>
I did too.<blockquote></blockquote>
I was just as much an idiot as most people, either apolitical, right or left.<blockquote></blockquote>
Instead of taking the time to educate myself about the reality and the truth, I too just accepted the lies and the propaganda like some insipid apathetic sponge.<blockquote></blockquote>
After discovering how much I have been lied too though, trust me, I am never going to allow anyone to tell me what to think again.<blockquote></blockquote>
Most especially I am not going to let the parade of halfwits, mostly so called White Nationalists, that posture as intellectuals in the Nationalist movement tell me what to think. Most of them are just as uncritically accepting of propaganda as the masses are.<blockquote></blockquote>
The Great Lie I am referring too is the lie about Femen.<blockquote></blockquote>
We all know about Femen right, a bunch of lefty birds who go topless to call for Communism in society.<blockquote></blockquote>
WRONG.<blockquote></blockquote>
This is Femen ;<blockquote></blockquote>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FEMEN#cite_note-1191)<blockquote></blockquote>
1) They protest about the sexual slavery and trafficking of white, Ukranian and Eastern Europe by ethnic gangs across the European Union. They are fighting to defend white European women from being sold into sex slavery and trafficked like animals by vermin of all ethnicities across the EU. Anna Hutsol is credited as founding the FEMEN movement, on 10 April 2008, after she became aware of sad stories of Ukrainian woman duped into going abroad and then taken advantage of sexually.
<blockquote></blockquote>
2) They demand the criminalisation of prostitution to defend women across the EU.<blockquote></blockquote>
3) FEMEN has protested "against the limitation of democratic liberties and freedom of the press" during Viktor Yanukovich's presidency[87] and against (Ukrainian) government corruption.<blockquote></blockquote>
4) FEMEN protest actions have also taken place against alleged anti-Ukrainian policies by the Russian Orthodox Church and the Russian President and Government of Russia. It also demanded "independence for the Ukrainian church "
<blockquote></blockquote>
5) In the past (namely 2012) FEMEN had stated that its goals were "to develop leadership, intellectual and moral qualities of young women in Ukraine" and "to build up the image of Ukraine, [a] country with great opportunities for women.<blockquote></blockquote>
6) In December 2012 FEMEN "warned" the European Union "to stop immediately political, economic and cultural contacts with Gazprom-Kremlin's dictatorship"; because "dependence on Nord Stream will bring Europe to an economic collapse and the abolition of visas requirements for Russians threatens Europe with a cultural Armageddon".[92] An 8 April 2013 "topless ambush" of Russian President Vladimir Putin (accompanied by German Chancellor Angela Merkel) at the Hanover trade fair was described by Alexandra Shevchenko as "non-violent women protesting against the most dangerous dictator in the world, it got great coverage and will hopefully inspire people in Russia as well as helping us to recruit new members.<blockquote></blockquote>
7) The organization staged a topless protest at the 2012 Summer Olympics in London in opposition to "bloody Islamist regimes", which they accuse the IOC of supporting.[99] The protest included women in the clothing of Muslim men as well as signs stating "No Sharia"<blockquote></blockquote>
8) FEMEN activists burned the Salafist flag in front of the Great Mosque of Paris on 3 April 2013<blockquote></blockquote>
9) They fight against Islamism and against the repression of women in the West and abroad who are repressed and attacked and by Islamist thugs. <blockquote></blockquote>
Femen of course opposes abortion, but just I demand the right to full autonomy over my own body, so too I must accept a womans right for the same.<blockquote></blockquote>
I may oppose the idea of abortion, as is my right, but I have no right to demand women do as I wish in relation to their bodies.<blockquote></blockquote>
After doing the research on Femen I discovered something that made me realise their hostility to the Russian Orthodox Church which also controls the Ukranian Church.<blockquote></blockquote>
Its not because they are anti-Christian. Far from it. They want a Christian church hierarchy that are Christian. <blockquote></blockquote>
The head of the Russian Orthodox and Ukranian Church is an ex KGB agent who infiltrated the church to spy and inform on his fellow priests. <blockquote></blockquote>
Want proof ?<blockquote></blockquote>
Here it is ;<blockquote></blockquote>
1) http://www.orthodox.net/russia/2000-09-23-irish-times.html<blockquote></blockquote>
2) http://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/feb/12/1
<blockquote></blockquote>
3) http://www.keston.org.uk/kns/miscnew/KNS%20RUSSIA%20The%20Patriarch%20and%20the%20KGB.html
<blockquote></blockquote>
4) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1579638/Orthodox-Church-unholy-alliance-with-Putin.html<blockquote></blockquote>
Many in the Orthodox hierarchy are also accused of working as KGB informers, a fact that critics say the Church has never fully acknowledged.<blockquote></blockquote>
"Essentially, the Orthodox Church is one of the only Soviet institutions that has never been reformed," said one priest, who declined to be identified for fear that he could be defrocked. That fate already befell another colleague, Gleb Yakunin, in the 1990s when he called on Church leaders with KGB links to repent.<blockquote></blockquote>
So by fighting against the Russian Orthodox Church, which is exactly what Pussy Riot are doing, they are in fact fighting against a false church run by an ex-KGB agent who Works with Putin, the ex-head of the KGB.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Instead of attacking Femen & Pussy Riot as commies, they are in fact fighting against the Putin Imperialist state and its ex-KGB Kleptocracy and associated oligarchs, plutocrats and gangsters.<blockquote></blockquote>
Apart from the issue of abortion, every Nationalist will agree that none of the Femen positions are anti-nationalist.<blockquote></blockquote>
In fact they are NATIONALIST IDEOLOGICAL POSITIONS.<blockquote></blockquote>
We do not support Putins control of European gas supplies for instance. We are Nationalists, we demand that every nations puts in place its own sustainable energy supply systems to ensure we do not need to rely on foreign nations for energy supplies that then drags into Imperialist Oil Wars such as in Iraq & Afghanistan.<blockquote></blockquote>
<b>WITHOUT ENERGY SECURITY, THERE IS NO NATIONAL SECURITY.</b><blockquote></blockquote>
Putins control of European gas via the Ukrainian pipeline is not just a threat to the EU, Putin has already used the threat to stop the gas supplies in members of his Eurasian Union.<blockquote></blockquote>
Putin uses Russian energy supplies as a way to terrorise and control nations that depend on Russian energy supplies.<blockquote></blockquote>
We do not want to rely on Russian, Saudi or Israeli oil or gas.<blockquote></blockquote>
We demand national energy independence.<blockquote></blockquote>
Nationalists have allowed the media, Putin and morons within the Nationalist movement itself many of them with an agenda, to lie to us, deceive us and manipulate us.<blockquote></blockquote>
Femen are not our allies. That is true.<blockquote></blockquote>
But neither are they our enemy.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Instead of attacking Femen and Pussy Riot, and supporting the Putin supporting vermin who do this to their supporters in Russia - we should let them get on with their project to bring down Putin and his evil Shadow Soviet Union. <blockquote></blockquote>
Attacks like this on Pussy Riots members such as in the video link below which were perpetrated by by pro-Putin Anti-Fascist red members of his anti-Fascist youth organisation NASHI are disgusting ;<blockquote></blockquote>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Xnf5bDBTg<blockquote></blockquote>
That is Putinism.<blockquote></blockquote>
On 19 December 2011 FEMEN performed a topless protest against Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko outside the KGB Headquarters in Minsk, mocking Lukashenko's recognizable haircut and moustache.Afterwards, according to FEMEN, the three protesters Inna Shevchenko, Oksana Shachko and Aleksandra Nemchinova were abducted by the Belarus authorities and taken to a remote forest blindfolded, doused with oil, forced to strip and then threatened with being set on fire, before having their hair violently cut with knives and being abandoned in the snow half-naked <blockquote></blockquote>
Is that what nationalists are supposed to support ? Attacks like this on our daughters, cousins and women by the same anti-fascist pro-Putin thugs doing this to young nationalists in the Ukraine ;<blockquote></blockquote>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGXFtQVwzUk<blockquote></blockquote>
No.<blockquote></blockquote>
That is what cowards do, not men.<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.nytimes.com/video/multimedia/100000002753646/ukraine-femen-activists-protest-outside-crimean-parliament.html<blockquote>
</blockquote>
These are the same Cossack pro-Putin thugs standing alongside the anti-fascist mobs attacking Nationalists in the Ukraine, who did this to Pussy Riot in the Olympics ;<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/feb/19/pussy-riot-attacked-whips-cossack-milita-sochi-winter-olympics<blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUSdag3H1R7iqwIrKHt8WeudjqL4jxgoGOw7-nhsPkl4NwfdN3kYVv1iZtUYCFkShsH23nFgWkNn-Dg9eNp2tqyfRWSv1KsQRLiEMQ4jVdP97zx84roeuwRYLhW4MDuAfXGd_Hc2AZzpGa/s1600/pussy-riot-attacked-by-co-010.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUSdag3H1R7iqwIrKHt8WeudjqL4jxgoGOw7-nhsPkl4NwfdN3kYVv1iZtUYCFkShsH23nFgWkNn-Dg9eNp2tqyfRWSv1KsQRLiEMQ4jVdP97zx84roeuwRYLhW4MDuAfXGd_Hc2AZzpGa/s640/pussy-riot-attacked-by-co-010.jpg" /></a></div>
The very same cossacks whose ancestors were murdered by Communists now prostrate themselves before Putin and his false Church and fight alongside pro-Communist mobs in Crimea ;
</blockquote>
1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decossackization<blockquote></blockquote>
2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repatriation_of_Cossacks_after_World_War_II<blockquote></blockquote>
Now Cossack 'men' beat young girls with horse whips and some nationalists cheer that.<blockquote></blockquote>
Each is as ugly and stupid as the other. <blockquote></blockquote>
Russia has lost its honour and soul under Putin.<blockquote></blockquote>
It has become a pitiful whore to his propaganda and the most shallow and pernicious form of reactionary right Plastic Patriotism.<blockquote></blockquote>
As long as some retard waves a plastic Russian Flag, the Putin retarded masses will salute it and follow it.<blockquote></blockquote>
That is not Nationalism.<blockquote></blockquote>
That is the antithesis of everything that Nationalism and Nationalists stand for. <blockquote></blockquote>
Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-10378495998424119422014-03-06T02:47:00.000-08:002014-03-06T02:53:42.238-08:00Putin Imperialism, Yeltsin & The Lie Of Legality<blockquote></blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjkgp6JanrbwCzldgm2uRg83bt7dL5ymQ7dYSvBQpVPxm7K49ebtXekNpmTV1sknJIDMsgKIgOTgUX050hbvWC2BMh7IvqfTX_ZBonGKOZkgRPOlhNZyHuxlxpM2MJxNC0IbG76MsFKyEp/s1600/1993-russia-inline.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjkgp6JanrbwCzldgm2uRg83bt7dL5ymQ7dYSvBQpVPxm7K49ebtXekNpmTV1sknJIDMsgKIgOTgUX050hbvWC2BMh7IvqfTX_ZBonGKOZkgRPOlhNZyHuxlxpM2MJxNC0IbG76MsFKyEp/s640/1993-russia-inline.jpg" /></a></div><blockquote></blockquote>
One of the primary problems of a dumbed down education system is that it creates a dumbed down population.<blockquote></blockquote>
Hence why the average person has the mental capacity of a hamster and the memory of a goldfish.<blockquote></blockquote>
Not even the politicians, journalists and political commentators have a memory or historical vision that allows them to understand contemporary international issues like the Ukranian Revolution.<blockquote></blockquote>
In 1993 Boris Yeltsinj ordered an attack on the Russian parliament.<blockquote></blockquote>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_Russian_constitutional_crisis<blockquote></blockquote>
The constitutional crisis of 1993 was a political stand-off between the Russian president and the Russian parliament that was resolved by using military force. The relations between the president and the parliament had been deteriorating for some time. The constitutional crisis reached a tipping point on September 21, 1993, when President Boris Yeltsin aimed to dissolve the country's legislature (the Congress of People's Deputies and its Supreme Soviet), although the president did not have the power to dissolve the parliament according to the constitution. Yeltsin used the results of the referendum of April 1993 to justify his actions. In response, the parliament declared that the president's decision was null and void, impeached Yeltsin and proclaimed vice president Aleksandr Rutskoy to be acting president.<blockquote></blockquote>
The situation deteriorated at the beginning of October. On October 3, demonstrators removed police cordons around the parliament and, urged by their leaders, took over the Mayor's offices and tried to storm the Ostankino television centre. The army, which had initially declared its neutrality, by Yeltsin's orders stormed the Supreme Soviet building in the early morning hours of October 4, and arrested the leaders of the resistance.<blockquote></blockquote>
The ten-day conflict became the deadliest single event of street fighting in Moscow's history since the revolutions of 1917.[1] According to government estimates, 187 people were killed and 437 wounded, while estimates from non-governmental sources put the death toll at as high as 2,000.<blockquote></blockquote>
This action by Yeltsin has direct legal consequences for the actions of the Russians in the Ukraine.<blockquote></blockquote>
The attack by Yeltsin to topple the ELECTED Russian government was illegal under the Russian Constitution.
<blockquote></blockquote>
It breached the terms of the constitution of the Russian State.<blockquote></blockquote>
Yet the West and the Russian government of Yeltsin that replaced the former government regarded Yeltsins actions as lawful.<blockquote></blockquote>
Therefore the exact same scenario applies in relation to the Ukraine.<blockquote></blockquote>
The former leader of the Ukraine fled the country and after his departure a new government was formed to replace the previous one.<blockquote></blockquote>
In this case the Ukranian people, as opposed to a single tyrant using the army eg Yeltsin, did the toppling of the government.<blockquote></blockquote>
The fact that the former government of Russia then had no legal authority to issue any laws or decrees was affirmed by Yeltsin.<blockquote></blockquote>
The same situation now applies in the Ukraine.<blockquote></blockquote>
The former government have no legal authority, using the exact same legal principles as used by Yeltsin, to issue any request to Russia for them to invade the Ukraine or to undertake any actions in the Ukraine that conflict with the pre-existing legal agreements in place relating to Russian use of Ukranian territory in the Crimea.<blockquote></blockquote>
Putins decision to regard the request of Yanukovych as the order of a legal government is in fact unlawful.<blockquote>
<b>The fact is that regardless of Yeltsin being the Russian president AT THE TIME, the Russian Constitution stated that the President did not have the power to remove the Russian Parliament - especially by using the army and tanks to shell the Parliament building, murder hundreds of people and put members of the Parliament in Prison.</b> </blockquote>
Therefore there is no legal authority for Putin to regard the orders of Yanukovych as the expression of a government that still retains power in the Ukraine, neither in fact or law or in regard to the legal principle as defined by Yeltsin in the 1993 toppling of Parliament.<blockquote></blockquote>
The actions of Russia are therefore illegal under not just Russian law, but Ukranian law and international law.<blockquote></blockquote>
The basis of this is the fact that the legal principle stating that the toppling of a government illegally can be legal is the legacy of the modern Russian state itself.<blockquote></blockquote>
In the ongoing Ukranian example ;<blockquote></blockquote>
1) the surrender of power and the fleeing of the Yanukovych government from Ukraine
<blockquote></blockquote>
2) the issuing of illegal orders to Russia<blockquote></blockquote>
3) and the ongoing illegal actions of Russia in the Ukraine as mandated by Yanukovych <blockquote></blockquote>
also ensure that the previous government cannot claim any legal authority in regard to their assertion that they are the legal government of the Ukraine.<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-14715849642723133782014-03-06T01:16:00.000-08:002014-03-06T01:33:12.704-08:00The Ephialtes Griffin Strategy
<blockquote></blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiyIk7enqcOWApxXWEHvbW2siP9pslFthZXZrbrx6CmkFUNBgxZ8SqetFfe4_dRL6lIZ_MzzecAFIY-bchrLFiP3G05TSVw20KclQqFOGYnuowMkwd33hyphenhyphenGND8tjtF9bFCD0-yjeca4zQJl/s1600/ephialtes.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiyIk7enqcOWApxXWEHvbW2siP9pslFthZXZrbrx6CmkFUNBgxZ8SqetFfe4_dRL6lIZ_MzzecAFIY-bchrLFiP3G05TSVw20KclQqFOGYnuowMkwd33hyphenhyphenGND8tjtF9bFCD0-yjeca4zQJl/s640/ephialtes.png" /></a></div>
<blockquote></blockquote>
Image - Ephialtes Griffin - the betrayer of British and Ukranian Nationalists.<blockquote></blockquote><blockquote></blockquote><blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
People may have noticed Nick Griffin cosying up to the Golden Dawn and other European political parties of late.<blockquote></blockquote>
I would have called them Nationalist political parties, but after their absurd support of Putin and his Ukranian invasion plans for an Eurasian Union, they can no longer be defined with the Nationalist political spectrum.<blockquote></blockquote>
" <b>British for the British in the European Union</b> ", is as much an absurd notion as " R<b>ussian for the Russians inside the Eurasian Union</b> ".<blockquote></blockquote>
The fact that the parade of Putin fan boys and halfwits that run half the formerly nationalist parties in Europe now support Putins Imperialist plans to invade, occupy and exploit the Ukraine as the focal point of his Eurasian Union proves that Griffinite stupidity afflicts much of the former nationalist right.<blockquote></blockquote>
Some people have been wondering why Griffin has been spending so much time with the former nationalist parties in Europe.<blockquote></blockquote>
The answer is simple.<blockquote></blockquote>
After the next round of European elections on the 22nd May 2014, the BNP will lose both its remaining MEP seats.<blockquote></blockquote>
That means the party will lose virtually all its income.<blockquote></blockquote>
The flow of Euro cash that has funded Griffins little clique of lickspittles will dry up and the party has no money to keep the Griffin gravy train running. <blockquote></blockquote>
The BNP has lost almost all its elected officials and almost all its membership.<blockquote></blockquote>
It is now a pathetic shuffling hollow husk of a party facing financial ruin - especially after losing the recent will case.<blockquote></blockquote>
So it needs to try and draw in new supporters / mugs to fund Griffins lifestyle.<blockquote></blockquote>
Hence Griffin thinks that by being photographed with the parade of peacoocks, halfwits and pseudo-nationalists of parts of the European Right, that the far right supporters in Britain will return to the party fold.<blockquote></blockquote>
Its the strategy of financial desperation.<blockquote></blockquote>
Hence why Griffins idiot propagandists are busy churning out ridiculous ideas like the White man March - the sort of crass, asinine and facile stunts that merely make the BNP and nationalists look like a parade of halfwits.<blockquote></blockquote>
Its an idiotic political stunt - another idiotic stunt that will do nothing to prevent the continued collapse of Nationalism that has accelerated over recent years.<blockquote></blockquote>
No doubt a few of the Putin fans , impressed with Griffin shaking the hands of other traitorous Putin fans, will rejoin the party.<blockquote></blockquote>
Good.<blockquote></blockquote>
Let every idiot cluster together in the moronic Griffinite cult.<blockquote></blockquote>
The real nationalists will support the Ukranian Nationalists, whilst the fake and idiot nationalists can support the Red Flag waving anti-fascist mobs and militia attacking Nationalists in Ukraine and Russia.
<blockquote></blockquote>
We stand with the Spartans.<blockquote></blockquote>
Not with Ephialtes and his clique of traitors. <blockquote></blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2RaBzxV4Wv0rUslKUkUXKGOvlrg50bbWHIdzIP8rAJPNmAKQ_XOC4S-y4iIRI_7AcRkyBMqClpX8_rzb9q97YGUWxtOr1Im6MnEF9G-0GJ7LVlAXwqiA1xLBXt1wbc-GimCFnS4xmtd_H/s1600/300.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj2RaBzxV4Wv0rUslKUkUXKGOvlrg50bbWHIdzIP8rAJPNmAKQ_XOC4S-y4iIRI_7AcRkyBMqClpX8_rzb9q97YGUWxtOr1Im6MnEF9G-0GJ7LVlAXwqiA1xLBXt1wbc-GimCFnS4xmtd_H/s640/300.png" /></a></div><blockquote></blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMWRkeO1j6cFc0R7PrJ9uiMcQXGjSOSH5QXUruiGVHbkWB5it1QGQZ0s0L1MXsMrAdzufQ2wZfJL8jd1IEJaZ4U8Qvb6_wiaf6OQcAIs8kvMIARL8QfnvHQn66Xh9VKR3Wg-U5CzSuIsUu/s1600/RIGHT+SECTOR.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMWRkeO1j6cFc0R7PrJ9uiMcQXGjSOSH5QXUruiGVHbkWB5it1QGQZ0s0L1MXsMrAdzufQ2wZfJL8jd1IEJaZ4U8Qvb6_wiaf6OQcAIs8kvMIARL8QfnvHQn66Xh9VKR3Wg-U5CzSuIsUu/s640/RIGHT+SECTOR.jpg" /></a></div><blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-27432803300030632782014-03-05T09:44:00.000-08:002014-03-06T01:25:54.732-08:00The Ukranian Sniper Conspiracy Theory Explained
<blockquote></blockquote>
So now we have more pot stirring in the Ukraine re the phone call between Cathy Ashton and Estonia's foreign minister, Urmas Paet.
<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.channel4.com/news/ukraine-catherine-ashton-phone-shoot-maidan-bugged-leaked<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
This makes sense.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Both sides in this conflict, the EU & Putin both have a motive to try and discredit the nationalists in the Ukraine.<blockquote></blockquote>
Hence why that recording was leaked by the Russian security forces and why it specifically featured a conversation between two representatives of the EU smearing the Nationalists by insinuating that the protestors hired people to shoot themselves.<blockquote></blockquote>
I have no doubt that a wide range of window lickers will give some credence to these words.<blockquote></blockquote>
But the facts are clear - that we have a wide range of video evidence that shows conclusively that the police were shooting at the protestors both with sniper rifles and AK47's.
<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10651980/Ukraine-crisis-snipers-filmed-shooting-at-protesters-in-Kiev.html<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10651980/Ukraine-crisis-snipers-filmed-shooting-at-protesters-in-Kiev.html<blockquote></blockquote>
Note also the direction of fire - clearly coming from police lines ;<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.ibtimes.com/ukraine-euromaidan-watch-protesters-duck-cover-get-shot-kiev-video-1556881<blockquote></blockquote>
Note also in this footage - you can hear both sniper rifle fire and the sound of AK47's on automatic fire firing at the protestors - and also the rate of fire re the bullets hitting the ground and protesors is clearly not a sniper rifle firing. For that sheer volume of bullets only an automatic or semi-autmoatic rifle would do that.<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQhuD4F1yJ0<blockquote></blockquote>
Listen to the rounds coming in towards the protestors.<blockquote></blockquote>
Note the comments of a 'hail of bullets' coming towards the protestors.<blockquote></blockquote>
Sniper rifles do not create 'hails of fire'.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Note that the BBC crew recording the fire from the sniper in the hotel heard only a few shots from one window in one building.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Thats not a hail of bullets.
<blockquote></blockquote>
All the footage clearly shows police officers firing AK47's at the protestors and that was the primary volume of fire.<blockquote></blockquote>
Does that negate the possibility that some of the protestors were shot by accident or design by others around the square ? Of course not - but the video evidence, eye witness testimony and facts all show conclusively that the firing was primarily from the police and that firing killed most, if not all of the protestors. <blockquote></blockquote>
Thats clearly not sniper rifle fire we hear in the footage above - that is clearly machine gun fire from an AK47. Hence that came from the police, not the protestors.
<blockquote></blockquote>
and here we have footage of the police firing AK47's at the protestors ;<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lgraA2ubsk<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iICzRf8m21w<blockquote></blockquote>
Does that mean a more sinister explanation cannot be also true. Of course not.
<blockquote></blockquote>
I suggest that the truth is a lot more less interesting than the conspiracy theories.<blockquote></blockquote>
Keep it simple says Occams Razor.<blockquote></blockquote>
Cui Bono ?<blockquote></blockquote>
Who benefits ?<blockquote></blockquote>
Lets say that the Russian government led by a man who served 16 years as a senior high ranking KGB officer ordered snipers to target both the protestors and the police.
<blockquote></blockquote>
The reason for this is smimple - it then provides a pretext for the army to be sent in to protect both the police and the protestors. <blockquote></blockquote>
If the police could not break the demonstrations, which they couldnt after weeks of harsh violence and brutality, then the only other option would be to send in the army.<blockquote></blockquote>
That such a plan existed has already been documented, the toppled Ukranian government were about to launch a massive army led offensive to smash the demonstrations.<blockquote></blockquote>
The pretext for this, as discovered in the documents that were tried to be destroyed by the former prime minister of the Ukraine and discovered in bags thrown into the lake of his huge estate by people who saw pages of the documents floating on the water and retrieved them, was to plant a series of bombs in Kiev and blame The Right Sector. The army would then sweep in a smash the protestors.
<blockquote></blockquote>
But the primary flaw in the 'the protestors shot themselves' conspiracy theory peddled by the EU is this - it pre-supposes that ;<blockquote></blockquote>
1) The protestors would win the struggle against the government<blockquote></blockquote>
2) that the shootings would not justify yet more government repression of the protestors.<blockquote></blockquote>
One thing is clear to all real Nationalists.<blockquote></blockquote>
The more violence you use the state, the more powerful the state becomes.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Violence only feeds the monster.<blockquote></blockquote>
The use of terrorist violence throughout history has been used by governments as a pretext to impose ever more draconian laws to repress free speech, movement, protests and political parties.
<blockquote></blockquote>
No serious revolutionary would use violence against a government.<blockquote></blockquote>
The Video Camera Is Our AK47.<blockquote></blockquote>
Far better for the revolutionaries TO BE FILMED BEING THE VICTIMS OF STATE REPRESSION than using violence against the state.<blockquote></blockquote>
In a case such as we saw in the Ukraine, the violence of the protestors was at all times DEFENSIVE not offensive.<blockquote></blockquote>
They were attacked by the police and defended themselves. Therefore that provided no pretext for an army intervention.<blockquote></blockquote>
Nor does the idea make any sense that by shooting POLICE OFFICERS, WHICH WHAT IS THE TAPE STATES THE ALLEGED SNIPER / SNIPERS DID that this would benefit the protestors - as this would merely generate support and sympathy FOR THE POLICE, not the protestors.<blockquote></blockquote>
If the protestors really wanted to kill their own people to generate support from the masses, then they would not have shot a single police officer.<blockquote></blockquote>
To shoot or kill just one police officer is an invitation for the whole power of the state to come crashing down on your heads. It also generates only sympathy for the police and the government. <blockquote><blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
In the news media we read that the previous toppled Ukranian government said that 27 police officers had been shot during the protests.<blockquote></blockquote>
Yet no evidence exists to prove this 'fact' and no video evidence exists of any film footage of any protestors shooting at the police.<blockquote></blockquote>
If police were officers were shot, then such a situation only benefited one side - THE GOVERNMENT.<blockquote></blockquote>
Putin in his press conferences said that the previous Ukranian prime minister 'did not stick to the plan'.<blockquote></blockquote>
Now we can see what the plan was.<blockquote>
</blockquote>
As a final note re false flags attacks and the Russian government, remember the Russian apartment bombings of 1999 <blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhuvuXcfkDlxGQhfNxG9mf7o3iRZt9mzchLzbuAg8e-OUaCUb_pqYl-egx-wNoxEcY7GUzMxRf7vj_biz9o3xA7Q05Grm22_LMvAS10PLj0o_8h_MHwjrlLZ9jq1AYd8crLH7ZVk5NqZ3zO/s1600/Moscow+bombing+site,+1999,+Emergency_com+(1).jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhuvuXcfkDlxGQhfNxG9mf7o3iRZt9mzchLzbuAg8e-OUaCUb_pqYl-egx-wNoxEcY7GUzMxRf7vj_biz9o3xA7Q05Grm22_LMvAS10PLj0o_8h_MHwjrlLZ9jq1AYd8crLH7ZVk5NqZ3zO/s640/Moscow+bombing+site,+1999,+Emergency_com+(1).jpg" /></a> <blockquote></blockquote>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_apartment_bombings <blockquote></blockquote>
The Russian apartment bombings were a series of explosions that hit four apartment blocks in the Russian cities of Buynaksk, Moscow, and Volgodonsk in September 1999, killing 293 people and injuring 651. The explosions occurred in Buynaksk on 4 September, Moscow on 9 and 13 September, and Volgodonsk on 16 September. Several other bombs were defused in Moscow at the time.[1]<blockquote></blockquote>
A similar bomb was found and defused in the Russian city of Ryazan on 22 September 1999. Two days later Federal Security Service (FSS) Director Nikolai Patrushev announced that the Ryazan incident had been a training exercise.[2] This led some, such as Alexander Litvinenko and Anna Politkovskaya, to speculate that the apartment bombings had been carried out by the Russian secret service FSB (formerly KGB).
<blockquote></blockquote>
This is what happened to Litvinenko, a former FSB officer ;<blockquote></blockquote>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Litvinenko<blockquote></blockquote>
and to Politkovskaya <blockquote></blockquote>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Politkovskaya
<blockquote></blockquote>
Now where have we heard of governments holding 'training exercises' on days and in locations when terrorist attacks happened such as ;
<blockquote></blockquote>
1) 911<blockquote></blockquote>
2) 7/7<blockquote></blockquote>
3) The Boston Bombings <blockquote></blockquote>
Read these to find out if the FSB would kill people to provide a pretext for the Russian government ;<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.darkpolitricks.com/fsb-apartment-bombing-false-flag-attack/<blockquote></blockquote>
This video explains it all ;<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9cRoXgawVA<blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
Dark forces at work.
<blockquote></blockquote>
And they all want to try and undermine the Ukranian Nationalists so they can control the Ukraine. </blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
Watch the video. And see who had just come to power in Russia after serving 16 years as a senior KGB officer.<blockquote></blockquote>
Putin.<blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-64859795227552544542014-03-05T05:51:00.000-08:002014-03-06T01:27:12.469-08:00Why Putin Invaded Ukraine - Energy & Empires
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiuYofO-U0jcX1ZTRVmbE8-MPs-vbnlhwNzOAcIMD0IA9__APGZ_crL0PhOZFmLJMkTp4KIKEsOiBoFUwmSs_zYSKiV7yz7ZVahS2-0tesugKRZPKrIoKCjM5GxM-JcumpWYKIuCoHkvkUL/s1600/Right_Sector.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiuYofO-U0jcX1ZTRVmbE8-MPs-vbnlhwNzOAcIMD0IA9__APGZ_crL0PhOZFmLJMkTp4KIKEsOiBoFUwmSs_zYSKiV7yz7ZVahS2-0tesugKRZPKrIoKCjM5GxM-JcumpWYKIuCoHkvkUL/s640/Right_Sector.jpg" /></a>
<blockquote></blockquote>
There are three reasons why Putin has invaded the Ukraine.<blockquote></blockquote>
1) Hubris. He cannot stand the kick in the balls that the Ukranian Nationalists gave to him by toppling the pro-Russian corrupt political puppet regime that used to rule the Ukraine for Putins benefit.<blockquote></blockquote>
2) Energy - The Ukraine is the energy aorta of Europe, with vast amounts of Russian gas flowing through the Ukraine and then into the EU. This control of Europe's energy supplies allows him to control Europe via energy blackmail. If Putin turns the pipelines off, then almost a third of Europes gas stops flowing. In the great game of empires throughout modern history since the post 1918 period, whoever controls the energy ( usually in the form of the oil ) controls the world. At the moment America and its Arab puppet regimes control the oil, but as Peak Oil hits in the 21st century then supplies of natural gas will replace oil. Hence those that have the gas will control the world when the oil starts to run dry.<blockquote></blockquote>
The saying is true - There can be no National Security, without Energy Security. <blockquote></blockquote>
3) The Eurasian Union. <blockquote></blockquote>
Putins 21st century Geo-political plan is to create a vast supra-national bloc to challenge the EU, a sort of post-Soviet Empire run by Putin as his personal fiefdom.
<blockquote></blockquote>
This is what the Eurasian Union will look like ;<blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggf8lAOF-BO_OQd155LxtuaNlHE12r0a4LPEveIpBV6GnOwsNUr3YJFpgKm53MYE793egprVmsIu0m6zBuSteQWNcgmyApLXrEdDTJtAEOMzrURxGCxXdzsCEzxcyy3qMNnJmcirleYZCv/s1600/eurasian_union_map_by_saint_tepes-d5yk68m.png" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggf8lAOF-BO_OQd155LxtuaNlHE12r0a4LPEveIpBV6GnOwsNUr3YJFpgKm53MYE793egprVmsIu0m6zBuSteQWNcgmyApLXrEdDTJtAEOMzrURxGCxXdzsCEzxcyy3qMNnJmcirleYZCv/s640/eurasian_union_map_by_saint_tepes-d5yk68m.png" /></a>
<blockquote></blockquote>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurasian_Union <blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
If realized, the Eurasian Economic Union would comprise a number of states which were part of the former Soviet Union: Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan.[9][10] Vladimir Putin stated in November 2011 that the Eurasian Union would build upon the "best values of the Soviet Union"; however, critics claimed that the drive towards integration aims to restore the "Soviet Empire"
<blockquote></blockquote>
The problem for Putin is that the Ukraine is the key to the Eurasian Union ; <blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/opinion/eurasian-economic-union-with-russia-at-centre-of-putins-endgame/story-e6frgd0x-1226844074752 <blockquote></blockquote>
In addition to the geostrategic importance of Ukraine, getting Kiev on side is critical to the success of Putin’s proposal for a Eurasian Economic Union. Such a union will exist as a counter to the EU and allow Moscow to institutionalise Russia’s influence.
<blockquote></blockquote>
If realised, the Russian-dominated union would also potentially control one-third of the world’s proven natural gas reserves. It is also clear that losing Ukraine would dangerously undermine Putin’s standing and authority within his own United Russia political party, and provide an example of what dissatisfied populations can achieve through popular protests.
<blockquote></blockquote>
This is why Russian willingness to use coercive diplomacy to maintain an exclusive sphere of influence in the former Soviet Space should come as no surprise. After all, it was Putin who in 2006 described the demise of the Soviet Union as the “greatest geopolitical catastrophe” of the 20th century. To protect its declining influence, Russia has not hesitated to use its control of energy resources. At the height of winter in 2006 and 2009, Moscow cut off gas supplies to the Ukraine - and Europe - in disputes with Kiev over gas prices and gas debts.<blockquote></blockquote>
Russia also uses its position on a network of Soviet-era pipelines as the last exit point to European markets to bully clients and extract low gas and oil prices from Central Asian suppliers.<blockquote></blockquote>
For example, in 2009, in a dispute over gas pricing Russia suspended gas imports from Turkmenistan for nine months, which cost the latter an estimated one-quarter of its total annual GDP.<blockquote></blockquote>
Griffin, Golden Dawn, FN, Jobbik, NPD have all rushed to lay down and be petted by Putin. <blockquote></blockquote>
They have done so solely for their own short term political interests, and at the same time have betrayed both Nationalism and Europe. <blockquote></blockquote>
What Europe needs is a heroic resistance movement led by a revolutionary nationalist vanguard of young nationalists like the Ukranian Right Sector to lead the overthrow of the rotten old EU regime. <blockquote></blockquote>
Instead we have a clique of tired, weak, corrupt cowards who have sold out their nations and nationalism for the patronage of Putin, a man who would do Nationalists in his Eurasian Union and in a Putin controlled Europe exactly what he has already done to Nationalists in Russia. <blockquote></blockquote>
The primary reason why these puffed up political clowns of the pseudo-political right in Europe have opposed the Ukranian Nationalists is because the Ukranian Nationalists have done in a few months what these parasites have never achieved in decades of political activism.<blockquote></blockquote>
The Ukranian Nationalists have overthrown their governments and built a National Revolution from the ground up. <blockquote></blockquote>
Look at the European political nationalists, in their plush EU funded offices in designer suits supping fine wines and playing pathetic reactionary bourgeoisie games as they surrender ever more of our nationalist principles to appease the howler monkey liberals that hoot and yell perpetually demanding the dilution of nationalist principles in order for nationalists to sit beneath their tables and beg for the scraps they down to us like good, well trained pets of the traitorous elite. <blockquote></blockquote>
The European nationalists are too stupid to realise they will never win the rigged game of electoral politics, or they are just too corrupt to care.<blockquote></blockquote>
Therefore these sad pathetic parade of losers now go bowing and scraping to Putin for some pocket money to put in their already bulging pockets filled with EU funds, state cash and the subscriptions of their gullible members. <blockquote></blockquote>
Anyone with any intelligence knows you cannot win the rigged game of politics in the EU. All nationalist political parties are is controlled fake oppositions to perpetuate the illusion of democracy in the EU tyranny.
Even when Nationalists do win elections then their parties are banned ( NPD), arrested ( The Golden Dawn ), infiltrated by state agents ( BNP, NPD) the law forces them to change their constitutions to remove nationalist principles ( BNP ) or their leaders are murdered like Jorg Haider. <blockquote></blockquote>
We will never overthrow the EU through playiung the rigged game of electoral politics. <blockquote></blockquote>
That is why the European nationalists hate the Ukranian Nationalists and have now aligned with Putin, whose anti-nationalist venom inside Russia and whose IMPERIALIST plans for a supra-national state entity match only the Imperialism and anti-nationalism of the EU itself. <blockquote></blockquote>
The Right Sector are the future of European Nationalism.<blockquote></blockquote>
I stand with them and their heroes against all who will stand against the European Reconquista that we so deserve and need. <blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQgUVJsmILAbsQGcEcIK-DeZ19HqcrmOgCH0MrMcOm76KOHbLo7cAeeuGyPAVFiwGpk1sKA-mENxjwQa8ehQuPeQmun84JtzVXbvN7TKCl2TAzqUzKtYwCao0FhI8-7l4ab3ahmXMG04Sp/s1600/RIGHT+SECTOR.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQgUVJsmILAbsQGcEcIK-DeZ19HqcrmOgCH0MrMcOm76KOHbLo7cAeeuGyPAVFiwGpk1sKA-mENxjwQa8ehQuPeQmun84JtzVXbvN7TKCl2TAzqUzKtYwCao0FhI8-7l4ab3ahmXMG04Sp/s640/RIGHT+SECTOR.jpg" /></a>
Let the old, the weak, the cowards, the traitors, the corrupted and the stupid all stand together against us.<blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnr_doPsmoRhHSilhC7blx-3_YB-X_XxA7AjPBKXyB5y4GGNKQhbnOImMRpwVic9v1GJP61_K0frlGwKtO-4LhK4luiEp-h9JSGq2Z4GYkzffXZMFw9J9SYbSQ56ZK1CQzUvCCDdxoaYhV/s1600/Catholic+Priest.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhnr_doPsmoRhHSilhC7blx-3_YB-X_XxA7AjPBKXyB5y4GGNKQhbnOImMRpwVic9v1GJP61_K0frlGwKtO-4LhK4luiEp-h9JSGq2Z4GYkzffXZMFw9J9SYbSQ56ZK1CQzUvCCDdxoaYhV/s640/Catholic+Priest.jpg" /></a>
That way when the time comes, we already know who all our real enemies are. <blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9DwtxWObSg3172XPY-nmHd4GdZRpAuTIugeigvOmcIZMNqs6fNspTEktJMtX4xTAJ-anEIuSagLQamSpp_OY0ZOe0LsC_aGwR2xL1AGBHI9CM8-iWP4TUtrdebRal2YlYh9EvRVr_RhyB/s1600/kiev_si.jpg" imageanchor="1" ><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9DwtxWObSg3172XPY-nmHd4GdZRpAuTIugeigvOmcIZMNqs6fNspTEktJMtX4xTAJ-anEIuSagLQamSpp_OY0ZOe0LsC_aGwR2xL1AGBHI9CM8-iWP4TUtrdebRal2YlYh9EvRVr_RhyB/s640/kiev_si.jpg" /></a>
Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-22888328452712110632014-03-05T05:04:00.004-08:002014-03-06T01:28:41.032-08:00Putin - The Enemy Of Nationalism
<blockquote></blockquote>
There are those deluded nationalists who think Putin is our ally.<blockquote></blockquote>
They are wrong.<blockquote></blockquote>
He has plans for an Eurasian Union to copy the EU, another vast nightmarish anti-nationalist supra-national state to suffocate and repress the indigenous nations and people of Eurasia. <blockquote></blockquote>
Some people think that Putin is a nationalist.<blockquote></blockquote>
They are wrong. <blockquote></blockquote>
This is the reality of Putin's Russia.<blockquote></blockquote>
And is this what the BNP and other nationalists around Europe now support then ;<blockquote></blockquote>
Boris Spiegel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<blockquote></blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhEeUmbGnLTwBDW5RMtCfAl60u1hxu46ifc3lhi9dxPib1ubBeh66yuT_tZmYg-ZhniQ-Dc2cBEVMgwcjMRWP8KPLiZ6T1n_Ahaqu1E5-eisQUKUGVqSBf37_FizmN155dc84_ivOoHpvIo/s1600/220px-Boris_Spiegel.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhEeUmbGnLTwBDW5RMtCfAl60u1hxu46ifc3lhi9dxPib1ubBeh66yuT_tZmYg-ZhniQ-Dc2cBEVMgwcjMRWP8KPLiZ6T1n_Ahaqu1E5-eisQUKUGVqSBf37_FizmN155dc84_ivOoHpvIo/s400/220px-Boris_Spiegel.jpg" /></a></div>
<blockquote></blockquote>
The above is the Jewish Oligarch who was appointed by Putin and who worked until March 2013 as the head of the Russian constitutional law making body. <blockquote></blockquote>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boris_Spiegel<blockquote></blockquote>
Spiegel is the man who wrote the anti-Russian Nationalist laws that Putin pushed through the Russian Parliament to do this to Russian Nationalists ;<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/12/russian-nationalism-on-the-rise-despite-putin-crackdown/
<blockquote></blockquote>
and
<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/08/russian-political-prisoners-in-the-russian-federation/
<blockquote></blockquote>
and
<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/12/in-russia-ten-years-in-jail-for-extremist-speech/
<blockquote></blockquote>
Note the organisations this pro-Putin Oligarch is linked too ;
<blockquote></blockquote>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Without_Nazism
<blockquote></blockquote>
World Without Nazism - <blockquote></blockquote>
MBN has declared its official aims to be:
establishment of an international "early warning" system, monitoring and prevention of the uprising and spread of nazi ideas and actions; <blockquote></blockquote>
establishment of interaction with national, European and international law enforcement and judicial bodies in order to suppress any manifestations of neo-nazism, racism and xenophobia, including glorification of its accomplices, struggle against those who deny Holocaust,
<blockquote></blockquote>
cooperation with international European organizations, parliaments, public associations overseeing de-nazification processes in the UN member states,
<blockquote></blockquote>
incorporation into the educational system of the Council of Europe member-states (and further on of other states) of obligatory programs of teaching the Second World War and Holocaust history;
<blockquote></blockquote>
popularization of publicist materials, films, works of literature and art which cover issues of revival of the nazism threat, the need to struggle against it; <blockquote></blockquote>
support of organizations initiating investigation of activities against persons who are accessorial to nazi crimes of the Second World War; <blockquote></blockquote>
perpetuation of the memory of victims of the Second World War and Holocaust, heroes of Resistance and Soldiers-Liberators.[8]
<blockquote></blockquote>
According to a member of Russian Public Chamber and founder of a sub-section of the MBN in Russia Alexander Brod, MBN aims "to protect Russian-speaking compatriots in Baltic States",[<blockquote></blockquote>
Which it what it has done in the Crimea here - a video of Pro-Putin anti-fascists attacking Ukranian Nationalists whilst screaming 'Kill the Fascists' and wearing red soviet armbands <blockquote></blockquote>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGXFtQVwzUk<blockquote></blockquote>
Note also Putins state funded anti-fascist street army NASHI whose details are here ;<blockquote></blockquote>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nashi_(youth_movement)<blockquote></blockquote>
Note also the Golden Dawn leaders who are not in prison, which suggests they are either state agents or idiots, now support the same Putin anti-fascist mobs in the Crimea who killed their own people here ;<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.businessinsider.com/anti-nazi-greek-militant-group-claims-golden-dawn-killings-as-tensions-rise-2013-11
<blockquote></blockquote>
Any Nationalist supporting Putin is the enemy of NATIONALISM not just in Ukraine, but also in Russia and across the whole of Europe.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Putin is NOT our ally.
<blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-69394229469296471162013-08-21T09:44:00.001-07:002013-08-21T09:50:08.234-07:00The Nature Of Democracy <blockquote><blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
The first organisations to be hit by the virus were the BBC, CNN, CBS, Fox News and Sky News. At 09.30 GMT the screens of every computer in the BBC newsroom simultaneously went black. At the same time the live news feed on all the BBC news channels, CNN, CBS, Fox News and the Sky News satellite channel were replaced by a blank screen.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Each of these channels were now under the control of the virus. The same film footage was now being uploaded to be broadcast on every one the media channels that it had infected. <blockquote></blockquote>
A few seconds later a figure appeared on the screen. The figure in the film footage wore a white Guy fawkes mask, a black nehru style jacket and black leather gloves. He was sat behind a large black desk in a room with black painted walls. <blockquote></blockquote>
The figure said nothing for a few seconds, simply stared at the screen, then a sinister electronic voice began to speak.<blockquote></blockquote><blockquote></blockquote>
" In the next few hours, days, months and years humanity will face the greatest ever challenge to its survival as a species. <blockquote></blockquote>
Responsibility for the convergence of catastrophies that is about to begin is borne entirely by you and your leaders, not by us. You are each as individually liable for the criminal actions of your governments as the politicians themselves. It is your votes, or your refusal to vote, that elects and keeps your leaders in power.<blockquote></blockquote>
Therefore the crimes that your politicians commit whilst they are in power, they commit in your name. You are all as guilty as they are. <blockquote></blockquote>
Only when you have been forced to confront the evils created in your name, will you finally realise your own complicity in the crimes of your masters. <blockquote></blockquote>
<b>It is your mandate that validates their madness.</b> <blockquote></blockquote>
Your leaders and governments will tell you that we are terrorists. But that is a lie.<blockquote></blockquote>
The terrorists are those who have created the instruments of war about to wreak havoc upon the world, not we who have merely unleashed those terrible weapons upon their mad creators. <blockquote></blockquote>
We believe that only when mankind realises its greatest enemy has always been itself, will humanity be capable of evolving past its present primitive level of existence, that of a brutal, selfish, arrogant primate. <blockquote></blockquote>
Mankind must be made to gaze into the abyss of its own extinction. Only then will humanity be capable of transcending its desire for self destruction. <blockquote></blockquote>
So now bear witness to the legions of monsters that your leaders have spawned in your name. "<blockquote></blockquote>
The screen then began to flash images of nuclear weapons exploding, pictures of burnt children in Nagasaki and Hiroshima, bacteria moving on a petrie dish as seen through the lens of a microscope, napalm bombs being dropped from fighter jets in Vietnam, mass executions by firing squads in Iran, pictures of Iraqi prisoners being tortured at Abu Ghraib prison, US tanks parked in front of burning oil wells in the desert, apache helicopter camera film recording them blowing up cars and machine gunning people in the streets, Russian tanks in Chchnya shelling a town, American drones firing missiles at trucks on Afghanistan mountain roads, bunker buster bombs blowing buildings apart, cluster bombs exploding and other images of war and horror.<blockquote><blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
Then the figure reappeared on the screen.<blockquote></blockquote>
" We are not the ones who have spent trillions of your tax dollars, euros and pounds on researching, building and deploying these evils. It is your governments who are the greatest terrorists the world has ever seen. <blockquote></blockquote>
Remember that the evils about to be released upon the world are not our crimes against humanity. They are the crimes of your leaders and they are your crimes. <blockquote></blockquote>
Now none of you will be able to hide from the truth that you have for so long hidden even from yourselves. All of mankind is about to dine upon a banquet of consequences, one that it has prepared for itself. <blockquote></blockquote>
We believe that in order for change to come, then every single system must fall simultaneously. Political, economic, military and social. None of the present systems deserve the right to exist. They are all criminal. They are all our prisons. <blockquote></blockquote>
This is the gift that we give you. The space for new growth. The opportunity for humanity to construct a new future for itself. We have pressed the reset button on history. <blockquote></blockquote>
Out of the chaos of destruction shall arise the phoenix of creation. <blockquote></blockquote>
The darkness is coming. But after the darkness will come a new dawn. <blockquote></blockquote>
From today you are free. "<blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-49003126691212138492013-02-21T05:08:00.000-08:002013-02-21T05:10:08.951-08:00The Owl Tree
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
Winter night exhales, a hard white hoar,<blockquote></blockquote>
As wings on the wind, in silence kill,<blockquote></blockquote>
A whisper in the grass below.<blockquote></blockquote>
Upon the highest branch, its throne of sorts,<blockquote></blockquote>
Sits an ever watchful owl that hoots, <blockquote></blockquote>
Its hooded eyes, as razor slits await. <blockquote></blockquote>
Horned moon watches her deadly dryad,<blockquote></blockquote>
Between pale scuds of clotted cloud,<blockquote></blockquote>
Raked by the slash of blood red talons. <blockquote></blockquote>
She is the cold kiss of youths lost dream,<blockquote></blockquote>
Caught in the claws of a hollow heart,<blockquote></blockquote>
The rotting oak, is all that remains of me now. <blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-13280904701094569672013-02-13T08:28:00.000-08:002013-02-13T08:38:14.727-08:00My Thoughts on the British Democratic Party
<blockquote></blockquote>So yet again another 'Nationalist' party arises out of the rubble of the BNP, this one known as The British Democratic Party.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Led by Andrew Brons, and with some very capable people within its ranks, unfortunately it will be yet another stillborn party - one of the many that litter the history of the British nationalist movement.<blockquote></blockquote>
The reason why this party will fail is simple - it follows yet again the failed right wing reactionary path of all those that came before it.<blockquote></blockquote>
Nationalists are the Rainmen Of Politics, they are political autistics unable to ever break out of the reactionary right wing cul de sac within which nationalism has ghettoised itself for five decades.
<blockquote></blockquote>
This is the tragedy of Nationalism, that whilst it has a distinct left wing ideological background and legacy, instead it has been hijacked for decades by stuffed shirts of the reactionary right.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Nationalists never learn.<blockquote></blockquote>
Each time a new party is formed, it seeks to copy exactly the policies, image and ideology of every other reactionary right wing party that came before it.<blockquote></blockquote>
Whilst the British electorate have New Labour, the Lib Dems, Tories and UKIP to appeal to the middle class reactionary right - there is not one political party from the Nationalist movement that seeks to gain support from the largest, most radicalised, angry and important demographic in our nation = THE WHITE WORKING CLASS.<blockquote></blockquote>
The NF, BNP, BFP, BDP and all others of the nationalist right are all reactionary right wing ideological parties, each seeking to gain the support of the middle class and reactionary right wing voters.<blockquote></blockquote>
THERE IS NOT ONE NATIONALIST PARTY THAT IS BRITISH SOCIALIST AND BRITISH NATIONALIST - A SOCIAL NATIONALIST PARTY THAT OPPOSES BOTH MARXISM AND GLOBALISM.<blockquote></blockquote>
What our nation needs is a SOCIAL NATIONALIST party with the same ideology as that of the Golden Dawn in Greece = one that is radical, aimed at recruiting the white working class, that seeks to support the small British business owner against the global corporations, that represents British workers, British small family owned farms against the agri-business interlopers and that represents the interests of the British nation and people as opposed to the banks and supra-national institutions like the EU, WTO, NATO, World Bank etc etc <blockquote></blockquote>
SOCIAL NATIONALISM IS NOT MARXISM.<blockquote></blockquote>
Social Nationalism represents the British worker, British society, British families and our national community against the forces of globalism, bankster capitalism, liberalism, Marxism and Corporate Socialism.<blockquote></blockquote>
British Socialism is a state and government that acts in the interests of the British people, workers, business and nation as opposed to the interests of the socialist / communist party - which is the basis of Marxism and Leftist Socialism.<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<b>SOCIAL NATIONALISM IS NOT HITLERISM</b>.<blockquote></blockquote>
Hitlerism was a dictatorship. Hitler was funded by the Wall street Bankers ( Link here for the evidence - http://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_Hitler.pdf ) and was an Imperialist Capitalist project. <blockquote></blockquote>
The first victims of the Hitlerite dictatorship were not Jews, they were NATIONAL SOCIALISTS of the SA. <blockquote></blockquote>
<b>THE FIRST THING HITLER DID WHEN HE CAME TO POWER AFTER PASSING THE ENABLING ACT WAS TO MURDER THE GERMAN SOCIALIST WING OF THE NSDAP AT THE BEHEST OF THE CAPITALISTS AND INDUSTRIALISTS</b>.<blockquote></blockquote>
Here is the link that reveals the secret deal Hitler did with the industrialists and Capitalists who funded him into power - and who demanded that he murder the left wing of the NSDAP and start the mad war against the West that began with the invasion of Poland in 1939 - an invasion that of Poland that took place IN ALLIANCE with Stalin and the Communists - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_Meeting_of_20_February_1933<blockquote></blockquote>
The greatest lie of the 20th century is that Hitler was a 'nationalist'. <blockquote></blockquote>
Hitler was no 'nationalist'- the primary victims of the Nazis were not Jews, they were the NATIONALISTS of all the nations the Germans invaded, those whose nationalism and patritosm ensured they would be the primary resistance to the Nazis.<blockquote></blockquote>
Both the Nazis and Communists slaughtered Nationalists - and even worked together in Poland to hunt down and murderPolish Nationalists - links here ;<blockquote></blockquote>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German%E2%80%93Soviet_Treaty_of_Friendship,_Cooperation_and_Demarcation<blockquote></blockquote>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German%E2%80%93Soviet_military_parade_in_Brest-Litovsk<blockquote></blockquote>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestapo-NKVD_Conferences<blockquote></blockquote>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_AB_Action_operation_in_Poland<blockquote></blockquote>
Social Nationalism is the antithsis of Hitlerism. Social Nationalism does not use the power of the state to enrich the bankers, arms companies and corporations as Hitlerism did.<blockquote></blockquote>
Social Nationalism uses the power of the state to act in the interests of British workers, British businesses and the British nation. <blockquote></blockquote>
<b>THE BRITISH NATIONALIST MOVEMENT MUST ENGAGE WITH AND GAIN THE SUPPORT OF THE WHITE WORKING CLASS, NOT THE REACTIONARY RIGHT MIDDLE CLASS.<</b>blockquote></blockquote>
The reactionary right middle class are in the main, apathetic, cowardly and stupid.<blockquote></blockquote>
The only radicalised voting base is the white working class - those who have been abandoned by New Labour and shafted by the offshoring, pro-globalism, cheap foreign labour importing Tories. <blockquote></blockquote>
We need a new form of Nationalism to replace the reactionary rights obsolete ideological definition of nationalism.<blockquote></blockquote>
The reactionary right, the bastard heirs of Thatcher, support globalist free market economics and support the old Statist model of nationalisation.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Both those models are dead.<blockquote></blockquote>
The Free Market does not exist - what we have today is the Globalist Corporate Socialism system where the state bails out the bankers and pays off their gambling debts with our taxes.<blockquote></blockquote>
Nor do we need more witless state nationalisation, thereby handing power over workers to the idiot socialists that run the trades unions and handing control over those industries to transient governments who would use those nationalised industries as political footballs for their own short term interests.<blockquote></blockquote>
No, what we need is a new form of Nationalism = <b>WORKERS NATIONALISM</b>.<blockquote></blockquote>
In this new form of nationalism the workers in newly created and nationalised industries <b>OWN THE INDUSTRIES THEY WORK FOR.<blockquote></blockquote>
The interests OF THE WORKERS come first and foremost at all times.
</b>
This would be rather like the Co-Op or Debenhams worker ownership model, where instead of the industry being owned by the sharks of the stock market or controlled by the new clutch of idiots that re-infest the Houses of Parliament every four years - the industries are owned by the workers themselves.
<blockquote></blockquote>
The longer you work for a company, the more shares you own in it.
The more work you put in, the more profits you get to share. <blockquote></blockquote>
With this new model of worker ownership and plans to create a new Industrial Revolution in Britain based on energy, agriculture, heavy industry, coal mining, new railways, infrastructure renewal etc etc we can create a whole new class of workers whose affluence as a result of their work will allow us to wipe out much of the national debt that the bankers and politicians have hoisted onto the sholuders of our children.<blockquote></blockquote>
With this new class of workers making money from their work, communities will boom again.<blockquote></blockquote>
What we also need to do is engage with our people outside politics, at the level of the community.
<blockquote></blockquote>
This means we need three new struggles ;<blockquote></blockquote>
1) A social movement based on the model of Golden Dawn where they help the homeless, the creation of Hamas style social support networks in communities and the formation of a Sinnfein style model of engaging politically and personally at the community level with disenfranchised voters to create a whole new voting demographic.<blockquote></blockquote>
2) A cultural movement like Casa Pound in Italy.<blockquote></blockquote>
3) A new street movement like the Immortals in Germany, that engages with youth and that has festivals, gigs, clubs, youth centres etc<blockquote></blockquote>
But none of the above form part of the ideas or ideology of any of the nationalist parties.<blockquote></blockquote>
All they want to do is give each other important sounding titles, stuff leaflets through letterboxes, hold half empty meetings in grotty pubs and lose elections.<blockquote></blockquote>
Nationalism has a cult like mentality.<blockquote></blockquote>
It cannot innovate or evolve.<blockquote></blockquote>
Its become imbued with a pathetic club life mentality, a little pond for people to swim in and pretend they are big fish.<blockquote></blockquote>
So it will fail, as it has failed so many times before.<blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-21171961239729613922012-10-06T23:52:00.000-07:002012-10-06T23:52:11.875-07:00More DNA Evidence of European / Neanderthal Breeding
<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.genomeweb.com/sequencing/genetic-study-provides-more-details-mixing-between-neandertals-and-modern-humans
<blockquote></blockquote>
NEW YORK (GenomeWeb News) – The most recent mingling between modern humans outside of Africa and Neandertals appears to have occurred during the late Stone Age, according to a new genetic analysis by American and German researchers.<blockquote></blockquote>
To assess the time frame for Neandertal gene flow into non-African populations, a team led by Harvard University's David Reich and Svante Pääbo, director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology's evolutionary genetics department, did linkage disequilibrium analyses using genome sequences for European-America, East Asian, and West African individuals sequenced for the 1000 Genomes Project pilot.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Their findings, published online last night in PLoS Genetics, pegged the most recent introduction of Neandertal genes into the ancestors of modern Europeans at roughly 37,000 to 86,000 years ago. The team's less stringent estimates put this gene flow in a slightly narrower window: within the last 47,000 to 65,000 years.<blockquote></blockquote>
The analysis supports the notion that Neandertals and modern humans mixed with one another relatively recently, the study authors explained, and hints that "interbreeding may have occurred when modern humans carrying Upper Paleolithic technologies encountered Neandertals as they expanded out of Africa."<blockquote></blockquote>
Since the Neandertal genome sequence was reported in 2010, researchers have found that human populations living outside of Africa carry Neandertal sequences in their genomes — sequences that are commonly believed to be genetic remnants of ancient breeding events between modern humans and Neandertals following human migration out of Africa.
<blockquote><blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
Even so, the study authors noted, there is an alternative population substructure model that might also explain these patterns. In that scenario, the Neandertal sequences in present-day non-African populations would be predicted to stem from the existence of multiple hominin populations in Africa prior to the appearance of distinct modern human and Neandertal forms.<blockquote></blockquote>
"If this substructure persisted until modern humans carrying Upper Paleolithic technologies expanded out of Africa so that the modern human population that migrated was genetically closer to Neandertals," they wrote, "people outside Africa today would share more genetic variants with Neandertals than people in sub-Saharan Africa."
<blockquote></blockquote>
When the researchers looked at specific SNP linkage disequilibrium patterns in genome sequences of 59 West African, 60 East Asian, and 60 European-American individuals sequenced for the 1000 Genomes Project, though, they found evidence indicating that gene flow from Neandertals or a closely related species into some human populations happened much more recently than the modern human-Neandertal split.<blockquote></blockquote>
Through analyses that included genetic distance mapping for SNP pairs against a genetic reference map developed by Decode Genetics, the team estimated that gene flow from Neandertals occurred as recently as 47,000 to 65,000 years ago.
<blockquote></blockquote>
That argues against a population substructure-based explanation for Neandertal sequences in some human populations, since fossil records for modern humans and Neandertals each go back at least 200,000 years.<blockquote></blockquote>
While such findings are consistent with the modern human-Neandertal admixture model, the team noted, it doesn't rule out the possibility that population substructure also existed in ancestral human populations. If that were the case, the researchers explained, simulations suggest that the timing of Neandertal-human interbreeding may have happened over a somewhat broader time span, occurring during the past 37,000 to 86,000 years.<blockquote></blockquote>
"Genetic analyses by themselves offer no indication of where gene flow may have occurred geographically," the researchers noted. "However, the data in conjunction with the archaeological evidence suggests that the two populations likely met somewhere in Western Eurasia."
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote><a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-13278194189064794242012-09-16T01:39:00.000-07:002012-09-16T01:39:14.648-07:00The Only Way To Defeat Islamism
The only way to defeat Islamism is via a Reformation within Islam.<blockquote></blockquote>
Islam is 700 years behind Christianity in its evolution - it is where the Catholic Church was in the Middle Ages - burning witches, burning heretics and massacring thousands in the Albigensian Crusades against those like the Cathars.
<blockquote></blockquote>
The Islamists do not fear death, so killing them merely makes them martyrs.
<blockquote></blockquote>
You cannot defeat a Meme, which is Islamism, with bullets and bombs - they only help spread it.<blockquote></blockquote>
In the film The Fifth Element each time the defenders of Earth fire their missiles at the approaching evil, it grows stronger.<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6oZTq_KsXc&feature=fvwrel
<blockquote></blockquote>
So too does Islamism.
<blockquote></blockquote>
The only way to defeat it is to assist Moderate Muslims undertake a Reformation within Islam.
<blockquote></blockquote>
That means we have to stop conflating Muslims and Islamists as one and the same - as that is what the Islamists want.<blockquote></blockquote>
We must assist and encourage moderate Muslims to confront the Islamists and create the internal Reformation within Islam.<blockquote></blockquote>
That is the only way to ensure Islamism is defeated forever.<blockquote></blockquote>
The Islamists know this, this is why they kill 'apostates' who try to create such a reform movement within Islam.<blockquote></blockquote>
The Islamists are not scared of death - they are scared of only thing - that Islam undergoes a Reformation that makes them obsolete.<blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-46222081636674167752012-09-05T00:31:00.000-07:002012-09-05T00:31:26.201-07:00Democracy = White Genocide
<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/09/notes-on-populism-elitism-and-democracy/#more-31014
<blockquote></blockquote>
Notes on Populism, Elitism, & Democracy
Greg Johnson
<blockquote></blockquote>
Is democracy a good system from the perspective of racially-conscious whites?
<blockquote></blockquote>
(1) When both the United States and North Korea describe themselves as democracies, it is safe to conclude that “democracy” means close to everything and next to nothing. For my purpose, I will define democracy as the idea that the power to make political decisions should reside with the “many.”<blockquote></blockquote>
By the “many,” I mean more than a minority, but less than everybody. A society can be ruled by one man, a few men, or many men. But it cannot be ruled by all men, since in every society there will be at least some people who cannot be allowed to exercise political power, e.g., minors, the insane, criminals, etc.<blockquote></blockquote>
(2) Most White Nationalists are strongly inclined towards elitism, even though the opinions of the majority on such questions as economic nationalism and non-white immigration are far more sensible than those of the ruling elites who are imposing globalization and race-replacement on the people. If white societies were truly democratic on these issues, we would be a lot better off. But, although today’s so-called democracies could be improved by being more democratic, that is hardly an argument for democracy as such.
<blockquote></blockquote>
(3) I would like to argue that democracy, defined as placing political sovereignty in the hands of the many, is not a good system for racially conscious whites, or anybody else for that matter. To make my case, however, I must distinguish democracy, plain and simple, from two good ideas that are so similar to democracy that they are often confused with it.<blockquote></blockquote>
(4) The first good idea mistaken for democracy is what I shall call “populism,” or the principle of popular sovereignty, or the principle of the common good. I define this principle as the idea that government is legitimate only if it serves the common good of a people.<blockquote></blockquote>
In his Politics, Aristotle makes this principle the highest law and the criterion for distinguishing between good and bad forms of government. When a single man rules for the common good, we have monarchy. When he rules for his own private good, we have tyranny. When the few rule for the common good, we have aristocracy. When the few rule for their private and factional interests, we have oligarchy. When the many rule for the common good, we have what Aristotle calls “polity.” When the many rule for their private and factional interests, we have democracy.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Yes, for Aristotle democracy is by definition a bad form of government. But he believes that “polity”—popular government for the common good—is at least conceivable.<blockquote></blockquote>
The idea that the common good is the proper aim of politics is often mistaken for democracy, but they are not the same thing. The common good can be served by one man, the few, or the many. Furthermore, it is an open question as to which group—the one, the few, or the many—is most capable of securing the good of all.<blockquote></blockquote>
White Nationalists are, of course, racial populists. We believe that the only legitimate regime is one that secures the existence of our people and a future for white children.<blockquote></blockquote>
(For more on Aristotle, see my essay “Introduction to Aristotle’s Politics,” Part 1 and Part 2.)<blockquote></blockquote>
(5) The second good idea that is often mistaken for democracy is a so-called “mixed” regime that has a democratic element. For instance, the United States has a mixed constitution with elements of monarchy (the President), aristocracy (the Supreme Court and the Senate before it was popularly elected), and democracy (the House of Representatives). Representative democracy itself is a hybrid system, since the many appoint one man or a few to represent their interests. Virtually every European society today has a mixed constitution with monarchical, aristocratic, and democratic elements, as did ancient Rome and Sparta (which was technically not monarchical, since it had two kings at the same time).<blockquote></blockquote>
In his Politics, Aristotle argues that a mixed regime is more likely to secure the common good than an unmixed one. In an unmixed regime, the one, the few, or the many are liable to pursue their factional interests at the expense of the commonweal, simply because the other elements of society are not empowered to resist them. In a mixed regime, all three groups are sufficiently empowered to resist the attempts of the others to serve their interests at the expense of the common good. Yes, Aristotle was the first theorist of “checks and balances.”<blockquote></blockquote>
In an unmixed regime, we have to depend on the virtue of the rulers, since their selfishness can lead society to ruin. In a mixed regime, we do not have to depend entirely on the virtue of the rulers, since the one, the few, and the many all take part in rule, and even when their virtue fails them, they will still oppose the selfishness of the other factions out of selfish motives of their own.<blockquote></blockquote>
Thus Aristotle long anticipated Machiavelli’s critique of ancient political theory, namely that it was too dependent on human virtue. Aristotle would, however, reject the idea of modern political theorists that a good society can arise out of base motives. A good society can only be the product of virtuous statesmen, although he would grant that base motives can be harnessed to preserve the products of virtue, even when virtue occasionally nods.<blockquote></blockquote>
(6) Why is democracy, pure and simple, a bad system? Simply because men are unequal.<blockquote></blockquote>
To understand and pursue the common good, statesmen need certain moral and intellectual virtues: wisdom, intelligence, courage, justice, self-control, etc. But these virtues are not evenly distributed in the population. Thus it is very unlikely that the majority, by deliberating together, will ever hit on policies that are conducive to the common good (or even their own factional interests, for that matter).<blockquote></blockquote>
Nor would majorities working together be able to enact and sustain such policies over the long run.<blockquote></blockquote>
Moreover, the many cannot even be trusted to elect superior individuals to represent their interests, since they tend to fall for the bribes and flattery of slick and unscrupulous demagogues.<blockquote></blockquote>
(7) If the majority do not have the necessary virtues to serve the common good, then the only question is whether rule by one man (monarchy) or a few men (aristocracy) is best suited to serve the common good.<blockquote></blockquote>
If virtue is the sole criterion for rulership, then monarchy is the best system only under extraordinary and highly unlikely circumstances. For a monarch would have to be superlative in a whole range of virtues that are seldom combined in a single individual, and even more seldom combined to a superlative degree.<blockquote></blockquote>
Aristocracies can draw upon a whole range of men of consummate virtue: the wisest sages, the most stirring orators, the most cunning strategists, the bravest warriors. Only a god could possess all of these virtues at the same time. If one could find such a god-king, that would be the best of all systems of government. For he would combine all the virtues necessary for wise decisions with the power to actually decide.<blockquote></blockquote>
But it is folly to repose all one’s hope in a miracle. Thus aristocracy is a better system than monarchy, because only real regimes can serve the common good.<blockquote></blockquote>
Furthermore, all existing monarchies are actually aristocracies in practice, for if a king is to rule well, he must of necessity select advisors, delegate powers, and thus create “peers.”<blockquote></blockquote>
(8) However, aristocracy also has its limits. The main problem of aristocracy is that whenever power is exercised by groups, they must deliberate, and their deliberations must be able to produce decisions. Ideally, these decisions should be the wisest possible. But sometimes any decision, even a reckless one, is preferable to no decision at all.<blockquote></blockquote>
There are many procedures to terminate deliberation and force a decision. One can put a time limit on discussion. One can put matters to a vote. One can even leave it up to the toss of a coin. But in such cases, human beings are essentially abdicating their responsibility to an impersonal system.<blockquote></blockquote>
But if one needs more than just a decision, if one needs accountability for decisions, and if one needs an executor of decisions, then one needs a person who can decide. This is particularly the case during an emergency such as a war or a time of constitutional crisis when the existing laws and institutions prove themselves inadequate.<blockquote></blockquote>
In the end, one cannot be governed merely by laws and institutions. Legislators cannot envision and provide for every future possibility. Thus there will always be circumstances where individuals have to make decisions in the face of novel circumstances.<blockquote></blockquote>
And even if legislators could foresee every possible circumstance, one still needs individuals to apply the laws. And the application of laws cannot simply be governed by a higher set of laws, for how would one apply them? One cannot appeal to a third set of laws, for those laws also need to be applied. In short, the idea of general rules to govern the application of general rules leads to an infinite regress.
<blockquote></blockquote>
The only way out of that regress is to recognize another kind of intelligence, which can judge the applicability of general rules to particular circumstances. This is the faculty of judgment. But if judgment cannot be reduced to abstract general rules and incarnated in law books, it must be incarnated in a particular individual, the judge, who has the intellect to understand the general rules, the vision to apprehend and the tact to appreciate concrete circumstances, and the insight to apply the former to the latter.<blockquote></blockquote>
Judgment is required on all levels of a system, from traffic courts to matters of life and death for the entire nation. Thus even the most exalted and refined aristocracy has need of a monarch: someone who has the responsibility and the power to exercise judgment in exceptional situations regarding the destiny of the nation as a whole.<blockquote></blockquote>
Aristocracy by necessity is driven to embrace monarchy just as monarchy is driven by necessity to embrace aristocracy. Aristocracy is the best principle in normal circumstances, monarchy in emergency situations. In normal circumstances, the monarch should take his throne and preside over deliberations but give maximum latitude to aristocratic rule to ensure the most intelligent possible decisions. In emergencies, the aristocracy should give maximum support to the monarch to help him, and them, and the body politic, to weather the storm.<blockquote></blockquote>
(9) But although the few are far more likely to be able to discern and execute policies conducive to the commonweal, once they have power, how can we be sure they will actually do so?<blockquote></blockquote>
To answer this, we must face a difficult fact: a White Nationalist society will never happen unless we can assemble an elite of extraordinary individuals who create it and endow it with sound institutions. Since such a society can only be created by an elite, it must, of necessity, be led by it. So, again, how can we insure that such an elite, once installed, actually pursues the common good?<blockquote></blockquote>
The answer is twofold. First, one must structure the elite so that it can perpetuate and improve itself. Second, one must structure the system as a whole so that the many have the power to keep the elite serving the common good rather than its own factional interests.
<blockquote></blockquote>
(10) Although White Nationalists have a strong tendency to hereditarianism, hereditary aristocracy and monarchy are not the best systems, because there is a strong random factor in heredity that makes it possible for superior parents to have inferior children and inferior parents to have superior children.<blockquote></blockquote>
Thus if we are to be ruled by the best, we need ways to (a) recruit and promote the best children of the masses to elite positions, and (b) identify and demote the inferior children of elites to stations that better suit them.<blockquote></blockquote>
Elite parents will quite naturally love their children more than the common good. They will give their children every advantage of their station. Thus a well-governed society needs to take active measures to negate these advantages and to cultivate and promote geniuses from humbler circumstances.<blockquote></blockquote>
One of the best ways to do this is a rigorous and entirely public education system, as opposed to the present mixed public-private system which is designed to perpetuate the current corrupt elites while smothering or co-opting their potential rivals from humbler circumstances.<blockquote></blockquote>
The best institutional model for a White Nationalist society is the Catholic Church, which is ruled by a non-hereditary aristocracy which it recruits and promotes from its own ranks, and which elects a monarch from among the aristocracy.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Another useful model is the Venetian system. Although Venice was ruled by a commercial elite, it maintained an aristocratic rather than a merely oligarchical form of government by promoting to and demoting from the ruling stratum based on merit. Venice also had an elective form of monarchy, like the Papacy and other Italian city states, such as Genoa.<blockquote></blockquote>
Of course a White Nationalist society will be founded neither by a priestly nor a commercial aristocracy.
<blockquote></blockquote>
For the Old Right, a White Nationalist society would be founded by a martial/political aristocracy, which would more closely resemble the knightly orders of the Middle Ages or another militant order, the Jesuits, both of which were models for Himmler’s SS.
The New Right seeks to create a White Nationalist society by dethroning the current hegemony of anti-white ideas and instituting a counter-hegemony of pro-white ideas, propagating this hegemony through the educational system and culture and colonizing the entire political spectrum with a range of pro-white options.<blockquote></blockquote>
The vehicle for creating and perpetuating white hegemony is an intellectual and spiritual aristocracy, organized as a non-hierarchical network that can penetrate, subvert, and control all existing institutions that shape consciousness and culture.<blockquote></blockquote>
Such an intellectual and spiritual aristocracy need not worry about exercising power, so long as it sufficiently shapes the consciousness of those who do, which is merely to say that the New Right is a metapolitical rather than political movement. Politics is guided from afar by metapolitics.<blockquote></blockquote>
But a society sufficiently penetrated by New Right metapolitics would take on the form of a mixed regime with an aristocratic/monarchical leadership. Of course, most white societies already have that essential system, albeit in more or less degenerated forms. Thus New Right metapolitics aims at pouring a new, racially-conscious spirit into the existing institutional bottles.<blockquote></blockquote>
(11) Recall that the two good ideas that are often called democracy are (a) the populist principle that a system is just only if it serves the common good, and (b) the mixed regime with monarchical, aristocratic, and popular elements.<blockquote></blockquote>
With that in mind, we can raise the question: Do monarchy and aristocracy have need of a popular element? The answer is: Yes. If monarchy and aristocracy are to serve the common good, the people need to be empowered to constrain them.<blockquote></blockquote>
But what form can this popular element take, given the obvious failure of representative democracy?<blockquote></blockquote>
First, representative democracy can be improved by increasing the quality and decreasing the quantity of the electorate. One could limit votes to heads of households, property owners, or the gainfully employed. One could raise the minimum voting age. One could institute educational and public service requirements. One could give extra votes to the highly intelligent. In short, a democracy is more likely to elect an aristocracy if the aristocratic principle is used to determine the electorate.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Second, since democracy works best in small, homogeneous communities, one should adopt the principle of “subsidiarity,” meaning that any issue should be handled by the authority that is smallest, least-centralized, and closest to the “grass roots,” as long as it is capable of dealing with the problem effectively. Subsidiarity would allow deliberative, “direct” democracy and also improve representative democracy, since the smaller the community, the more accountable the elected representatives.<blockquote></blockquote>
Third, although the many are less qualified to frame and execute national policies than the few, the people are acutely aware of damaging policies, such as free trade and race-replacement immigration.<blockquote></blockquote>
Thus the people or their representatives should have the power to veto legislation that is inimical to the common good. The people should also have the power to depose public officials, including judges, who are inimical to the public good.
<blockquote></blockquote>
To prevent the people and demagogues from abusing these processes, they should, of course, be confined to extraordinary circumstances. They could, for instance, be carried out by calling special elections, referenda, or plebiscites.<blockquote></blockquote>
Fourth, the people should also be able to propose and impose legislation of their own through ballot initiatives and special elections. Again, to prevent abuse, these would have to be confined to extraordinary circumstances.<blockquote></blockquote>
Fifth, to keep the elites honest, the Ancient Greeks gave the people the power to audit public accounts.<blockquote></blockquote>
A little imagination could expand this list further. None of these measures would impede honest servants of the common good. But they would provide powerful deterrents to corruption.
* * *<blockquote></blockquote>
The powers that be have invested a great deal in promoting the value of diversity, even while pursuing policies that systematically destroy it. This has played into the hands of the New Right, since we are the true defenders of human biological and cultural diversity.<blockquote></blockquote>
In a similar manner, the establishment has invested a great deal into making an idol of democracy, even as they ignore the will of the people and trample the common good.
<blockquote></blockquote>
This can redound to the New Right’s benefit as well, for although we are frank and unapologetic elitists, we can argue in all honesty that we represent “true democracy,” or what is true in democracy, namely the principle of the common good and the idea that, in the name of the common good, the people must be empowered to resist the corruption of elites.
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-45314382332946913872012-09-05T00:20:00.000-07:002012-09-05T00:21:20.573-07:00Urban Warfare and Race Riots - Americas Future <blockquote></blockquote>
http://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2012/09/03/bracken-when-the-music-stops-how-americas-cities-may-explode-in-violence/
<blockquote></blockquote>
In response to recent articles in mainstream military journals discussing the use of the U.S. Army to quell insurrections on American soil, I offer an alternate vision of the future. Instead of a small town in the South as the flash point, picture instead a score of U.S. cities in the thrall of riots greater than those experienced in Los Angeles in 1965 (Watts), multiple cities in 1968 (MLK assassination), and Los Angeles again in 1992 (Rodney King). New Yorkers can imagine the 1977 blackout looting or the 1991 Crown Heights disturbance. In fact, the proximate spark of the next round of major riots in America could be any from a long list cribbed from our history.<blockquote></blockquote>
We have seen them all before, and we shall see them all again as history rhymes along regardless of the century or the generation of humankind nominally in control of events. But the next time we are visited by widespread, large-scale urban riots, a dangerous new escalation may be triggered by a new vulnerability: It’s estimated that the average American home has less than two weeks of food on hand. In poor minority areas, it may be much less. What if a cascading economic crisis, even a temporary one, leads to millions of EBT (electronic benefit transfer) cards flashing nothing but zeroes? Or if the government’s refusal to reimburse them causes supermarket chains to stop accepting them for payment? The government can order the supermarkets to honor the cards, but history’s verdict is clear: If suppliers are paid only with worthless scrip or blinking digits, the food will stop.
<blockquote></blockquote>
STEP ONE: FLASH MOB LOOTING<blockquote></blockquote>
In my scenario, the initial riots begin spontaneously across affected urban areas, as SNAP (supplemental nutrition assistance program) and other government welfare recipients learn that their EBT cards no longer function. This sudden revelation will cause widespread anger, which will quickly lead to the flash-mob looting of local supermarkets and other businesses. The media will initially portray these “food riots” as at least partly justifiable. Sadly, millions of Americans have been made largely, or even entirely, dependent on government wealth transfer payments to put food on their tables.<blockquote></blockquote>
A new social contract has been created, where bread and circuses buy a measure of peace in our minority-populated urban zones. In the era of ubiquitous big-screen cable television, the internet and smart phones, the circus part of the equation is never in doubt as long as the electricity flows. But the bread is highly problematic. Food must be delivered the old-fashioned way: physically. Any disruption in the normal functioning of the EBT system will lead to food riots with a speed that is astonishing. This will inevitably happen when our unsustainable, debt-fueled binge party finally stops, and the music is over. Now that the delivery of free or heavily subsidized food is perceived by tens of millions of Americans to be a basic human right, the cutoff of “their” food money will cause an immediate explosion of rage. When the hunger begins to bite, supermarkets, shops and restaurants will be looted, and initially the media will not condemn the looting. Unfortunately, this initial violence will only be the start of a dangerous escalation.
<blockquote></blockquote>
The ransacked supermarkets, convenience stores, ATMs and gas stations will not be restocked during this period due to the precarious security situation. A single truck loaded with food or gasoline would be perceived to be a Fort Knox on wheels and subject to immediate attack unless heavily protected by powerfully armed security forces, but such forces will not be available during this chaotic period. Under those conditions, resupply to the urban areas cannot and will not take place. The downward spiral of social and economic dysfunction will therefore both accelerate and spread from city to city. These delays, in turn, will lead to more riots with the constant underlying demand that hungry people be fed, one way or another.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Catch-22, anyone? When these demands do not bring the desired outcome, the participants will ratchet up the violence, hoping to force action by the feckless state and national governments.<blockquote></blockquote>
The “food riots” will be a grass-roots movement of the moment born out of hunger and desperation. It will not be dependent upon leaders or an underlying organization, although they could certainly add to the sauce. Existing cell phone technology provides all the organization a flash mob needs. Most of the mobs will consist of minority urban youths, termed MUYs in the rest of this essay. Which minority doesn’t matter; each urban locale will come with its own unique multi-ethnic dynamic.<blockquote></blockquote>
Some locales will divide upon religious or political lines, but they will not be the dominant factors contributing to conflict. In the American context, the divisions will primarily have an ethnic or racial context, largely because that makes it easy to sort out the sides at a safe distance. No need to check religious or political affiliation at a hundred yards when The Other is of a different color.<blockquote></blockquote>
We Americans are all about doing things the easy way, so, sadly, visible racial and ethnic features will form the predominant lines of division.<blockquote></blockquote>
Would that it were not so, but reality is reality, even when it’s is a bitch.<blockquote></blockquote>
Especially then.<blockquote></blockquote>
NEXT STEP: FLASH MOB RIOTS<blockquote></blockquote>
In order to highlight their grievances and escalate their demands for an immediate resumption of government benefits, the MUY flash mobs will next move their activities to the borders of their ethnic enclaves. They will concentrate on major intersections and highway interchanges where non-MUY suburban commuters must make daily passage to and from what forms of employment still exist. People making a living will still be using those roads to get to where they earn their daily bread.<blockquote></blockquote>
The results of these clashes will frequently resemble the intersection of Florence and Normandie during the Rodney King riots in 1992, where Reginald Denny was pulled out of his truck’s cab and beaten nearly to death with a cinder block. If you don’t remember it, watch it on Youtube. Then imagine that scene with the mob-making accelerant of texting and other social media technology added to stoke the fires. Instead of a few dozen thugs terrorizing the ambushed intersections, in minutes there will be hundreds.<blockquote></blockquote>
Rioters will throw debris such as shopping carts and trash cans into the intersection, causing the more timid drivers to pause. The mobs will swarm the lines of trapped cars once they have stopped. Traffic will be forced into gridlock for blocks in all directions. Drivers and passengers of the wrong ethnic persuasions will be pulled from their vehicles to be beaten, robbed, and in some cases raped and/or killed. It will be hyper-violent and overtly racial mob behavior, on a massive and undeniable basis.<blockquote></blockquote>
Some of those trapped in their cars will try to drive out of the area, inevitably knocking down MUY pedestrians and being trapped by even more outraged MUYs. The commuters will be dragged out of their cars and kicked or beaten to death. Other suburban commuters will try to shoot their way out of the lines of stopped cars, and they will meet the same grim fate once they run out of bullets and room to escape.<blockquote></blockquote>
The mob will be armed with everything from knives, clubs and pistols to AK-47s. A bloodbath will result. These unlucky drivers and their passengers will suffer horribly, and some of their deaths will be captured on traffic web cameras. Later, these terrible scenes will be released or leaked by sympathetic government insiders and shown by the alternative media, which continue to expand as the traditional media become increasingly irrelevant.<blockquote></blockquote>
Implausible, you insist?<blockquote></blockquote>
This grim tableau is my analysis of age-old human behavior patterns, adding flash mobs and 2012 levels of racial anger to the old recipe. Early-teenage MUYs today are frequently playing “The Knockout Game” on full bellies, just for kicks, and proudly uploading the videos. They and their older peers can be expected to do far worse when hunger and the fear of starvation enter their physical, mental, and emotional equations. The blame for their hunger will be turned outward against the greater society, and will be vented at first hand against any non-MUY who falls into their grasp while they are in the thrall of mob hysteria. These episodes of mass psychology we will refer to as “flash mob riots”, “wilding”, or some other new name.<blockquote></blockquote>
THE OFFICIAL POLICE RESPONSE TO FLASH MOB RIOTS<blockquote></blockquote>
To gear up for even a single “Florence and Normandie on steroids” flash mob street riot, city police departments will require an hour or longer to stage their SWAT teams and riot squads in position to react. Ordinary patrol cars in small numbers will not venture anywhere near such roiling masses of hysterical rioters, not even to perform rescues. Those citizens trapped in their cars cannot expect timely assistance from local or state authorities.<blockquote></blockquote>
Even in the first days of widespread riots, when the police forces are well rested, it might take several hours to mount a response sufficient to quell the disturbance and restore order to even one major street intersection riot. In the meantime, scores of innocent commuters will have been attacked, with many of them injured or killed and left at the scene. It will be a law enforcement nightmare to quell the disturbance, mop up lingering rioters, restore security, and bring medical attention to the living and get medical examiners to the dead. And each jurisdiction will face potentially dozens of such scenes, thanks to the ability for MUYs to cross-communicate at will using their wireless devices.<blockquote></blockquote>
The far more difficult challenge for the police is that by the time they are suited in riot gear, armed and geared up to sweep the intersection, it will probably be empty of rioters. The police, with their major riot squad reaction times measured in hours, will be fighting flash mobs that materialize, cause mayhem, and evaporate in only fractions of hours. This rapid cycle time is a clear lesson taken from massive riots by immigrant French Muslim MUYs in their own religious enclaves and bordering areas.<blockquote></blockquote>
The American flash mob riot will exist almost entirely inside the law enforcement OODA (observe, orient, decide, act) loop. In other words, the rioters will have a much quicker reaction time than the police. Until fairly recently, superior police communications meant that they could use their radio networks as a force multiplier. With their networking advantage and cohesive reactions both within a department and among cooperating local agencies, police could act as shepherds guiding or dispersing a wayward stampeding flock.<blockquote></blockquote>
Today, the mob has the greater advantage, immediately spreading word of every police preparation by text and Tweet, even in advance of the police movement. Attempts by the authorities to stop the flash mobs by blocking and jamming wireless transmissions will have limited success.<blockquote></blockquote>
It is at this point that the situation spirals out of control.<blockquote></blockquote>
The enraged mobs in urban America will soon recognize that their spontaneous street riots cannot be stopped by the police, and then they will grow truly fearsome. For the police, it will be a losing game of Whack-a-Mole, with riots breaking out and dispersing at a speed they cannot hope to match. The violence will spread to previously unaffected cities as an awareness of law enforcement impotence is spread by television and social media. After a few days, the police forces will be exhausted and demoralized. As the violence intensifies and spreads, and in the absence of any viable security arrangements, supermarkets and other stores will not be restocked, leaving the MUYs even more desperate and angry than before. The increasing desperation born of worsening hunger will refuel the escalating spiral of violence.<blockquote></blockquote>
Nor will violent conflict be only between the inhabitants of the urban areas and the suburbs. The international record of conflict in tri-ethnic cities is grim, making the old bi-racial dichotomy formerly seen in America seem stable by comparison. In tri-ethnic cities the perceived balance of power is constantly shifting, with each side in turn feeling outnumbered and outmuscled. Temporary truces, betrayals and new alliances follow in rapid succession, removing any lingering sense of social cohesion.<blockquote></blockquote>
The former Yugoslavia, with its Catholic, Orthodox and Muslim divisions, comes starkly to mind. The Lebanese Civil War between the Christians, Sunnis, Shiites and Druze raged across Beirut (at one time known as “The Paris of the Middle East”) for fifteen brutal years. Once a city turns on itself and becomes a runaway engine of self-destruction, it can be difficult to impossible to switch off the process and return to normal pre-conflict life. It’s not inconceivable that the United States could produce a dozen Sarajevos or Beiruts, primarily across racial instead of religious divides.<blockquote></blockquote>
Vehicle traffic by non-minority suburban commuters through adjoining minority areas will virtually halt, wrecking what is left of the local economy. Businesses will not open because employees will not be able to travel to work safely. Businesses in minority areas, needless to say, will be looted. “Gentrified” enclaves of affluent suburbanites within or near the urban zones will suffer repeated attacks, until their inhabitants flee.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Radically disaffected minorities will hold critical infrastructure corridors through their areas hostage against the greater society. Highways, railroad tracks, pipe and power lines will all be under constant threat, or may be cut in planned or unplanned acts of raging against “the system.” As long as security in the urban areas cannot be restored, these corridors will be under threat. Even airports will not be immune. Many of them have been absorbed into urban areas, and aircraft will come under sporadic fire while taking off and landing.<blockquote></blockquote>
In the absence of fresh targets of value blundering into their areas, and still out of food, MUYs will begin to forage beyond their desolated home neighborhoods and into suburban borderlands. “Safe” supermarkets and other stores will be robbed in brazen commando-like gang attacks. Carjackings and home invasions will proliferate madly. As I have discussed in my essay “The Civil War Two Cube,” so-called “transitional” and mixed-ethnic areas will suffer the worst violence. These neighborhoods will become utterly chaotic killing zones, with little or no help coming from the overstretched police, who will be trying to rest up for their next shift on riot squad duty, if they have not already deserted their posts to take care of their own families.<blockquote></blockquote>
THE SUBURBAN ARMED VIGILANTE RESPONSE<blockquote></blockquote>
In the absence of an effective official police response to the exploding levels of violence, suburbanites will first hastily form self-defense forces to guard their neighborhoods—especially ones located near ethnic borders. These ubiquitous neighborhood armed defense teams will often have a deep and talented bench from which to select members, and they will not lack for volunteers.<blockquote></blockquote>
Since 9-11, hundreds of thousands of young men (and more than a few women) have acquired graduate-level educations in various aspects of urban warfare. In the Middle East these troops were frequently tasked with restoring order to urban areas exploding in internecine strife. Today these former military men and women understand better than anyone the life-or-death difference between being armed and organized versus unarmed and disorganized.<blockquote></blockquote>
Hundreds of thousands if not millions of veterans currently own rifles strikingly similar to those they carried in the armed forces, lacking only the full-automatic selector switch. Their brothers, sisters, parents, friends, and neighbors who did not serve in the military are often just as familiar with the weapons, if not the tactics. Today the AR-pattern rifle (the semi-automatic civilian version of the familiar full-auto-capable M-16 or M-4) is the most popular model of rifle in America, with millions sold in the past decade. Virtually all of them produced in the past decade have abandoned the old M-16′s signature “carrying handle” rear iron sight for a standardized sight mounting rail, meaning that virtually every AR sold today can be easily equipped with an efficient optical sight. Firing the high-velocity 5.56×45 mm cartridge and mounted with a four-power tactical sight, a typical AR rifle can shoot two-inch groups at one hundred yards when fired from a steady bench rest. That translates to shooting eight- to ten-inch groups at four hundred yards.<blockquote></blockquote>
Four hundred yards is a long walk. Pace it off on a straight road, and observe how tiny somebody appears at that distance. Yet a typical AR rifle, like those currently owned by millions of American citizens, can hit a man-sized target at that range very easily, given a stable firing platform and a moderate level of shooting ability.<blockquote></blockquote>
And there are a far greater number of scoped bolt-action hunting rifles in private hands in the United States. Keep this number in mind: based on deer stamps sold, approximately twenty million Americans venture into the woods every fall armed with such rifles, fully intending to shoot and kill a two-hundred-pound mammal. Millions of these scoped bolt-action deer rifles are quite capable of hitting a man-sized target at ranges out to and even beyond a thousand yards, or nearly three-fifths of a mile. In that context, the 500-yard effective range of the average semi-auto AR-pattern rifle is not at all remarkable.<blockquote></blockquote>
So, we have millions of men and women with military training, owning rifles similar to the ones they used in combat operations overseas from Vietnam to Afghanistan. Many of these Soldiers and Marines have special operations training. They are former warriors with experience at conducting irregular warfare and counter-terrorism operations in dangerous urban environments. They are the opposite of unthinking robots: their greatest military talent is looking outside the box for new solutions. They always seek to “over-match” their enemies, using their own advantages as force multipliers while diminishing or concealing their weaknesses. These military veterans are also ready, willing and able to pass on their experience and training to interested students in their civilian circles.<blockquote></blockquote>
Let’s return to our hypothetical Florence and Normandie intersection, but this time with hundreds of rioters per city block, instead of mere dozens. Among the mobs are thugs armed with pistols and perhaps even AK-47s equipped with standard iron sights, and except in rare cases, these rifles have never been “zeroed in” on a target range. In other words, past a medium distance of fifty to a hundred yards, these MUY shooters will have little idea where their fired bullets will strike—nor will they care. Typically, most of the rioters armed with a pistol, shotgun or an iron-sighted rifle could not hit a mailbox at a hundred yards unless by luck. Inside that distance, any non-MUY could be at immediate risk of brutal death at the hands of an enraged mob, but beyond that range, the mob will pose much less danger.<blockquote></blockquote>
Taking this imbalance in effective ranges of the firearms most likely to be available to both sides, certain tactical responses are sure to arise, and ranking near the top will be the one described next.<blockquote></blockquote>
THE SNIPER AMBUSH: THE NEW TACTIC OF CHOICE<blockquote></blockquote>
The sniper ambush will predictably be used as a counter to rampaging mobs armed only with short- to medium-range weapons. This extremely deadly trick was developed by our war fighters in Iraq and Afghanistan, taking advantage of the significant effective range and firepower of our scoped 5.56mm rifles. Tactics such as the sniper ambush may not be seen early in the civil disorder, but they will surely arise after a steady progression of atrocities attributed to rampaging MUYs.<blockquote></blockquote>
Street intersection flash mob riots will not be the only type of violence exploding during periods of civil disorder. As mentioned earlier, the number and ferocity of home invasions will skyrocket, and they will be very hard to defend against. Neighborhood self-defense forces will be able to protect a group of homes if they are located on cul-de-sacs or in defensible subdivisions with limited entrances, turning them overnight into fortified gated communities. Individual homes and apartment buildings located in open grid-pattern neighborhoods with outside access from many directions will be much more difficult to defend, and the home invasions will continue.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Carjacking and other forms of armed robbery will proliferate to previously unimagined levels, leading to a total loss of confidence in the government’s ability to provide security across all social lines. Stray bullets striking pedestrians or penetrating houses will take a frightening toll, even in areas previously considered to be safe. The police will be exhausted by constant riot-squad duty, and will not even respond to reports of mere individual acts of violent criminality. They will simply be overwhelmed, and will be forced to triage their responses. The wealthy, powerful and politically well-connected will demand the lion’s share of remaining police resources, further diminishing the safety of average Americans.
<blockquote></blockquote>
In that context, neighborhood self-defense forces will form the nucleus of the armed vigilante direct action groups which will spring up next in the progression. Suburban anger will continue to build against the MUYs, who are perceived to be the originators of the home invasions and gang-level armed looting raids. Survivors of street ambushes, carjackings and home invasions will tell blood-curdling tales and show horrific scars.
<blockquote></blockquote>
The neighborhood defense teams will evolve into proactive suburban armed vigilante groups (SAVs) out of a desire to preemptively take the violence to their perceived enemies, instead of passively waiting for the next home invasion or carjacking. The SAV teams will consist of the more aggressive and gung-ho members of the self-defense forces, who met and compared notes. Often they will be young men with recent combat experience in the armed forces, who will apply their military training to the new situation. Major intersections and highway interchanges where ambush riots have previously occurred will be among the SAV targets. The SAV reaction times will be measured in minutes, compared to the hours required by major police department SWAT teams and riot squads.<blockquote></blockquote>
A SAMPLE SNIPER AMBUSH SCENARIO<blockquote></blockquote>
When word is received that a flash mob is forming at one of their pre-reconnoitered intersections or highway interchanges, the SAV team will assemble. Sometimes cooperating police will pass tactical intel to their civilian friends on the outside. Some clever individuals will have exploited their technical know-how and military experience to build real-time intel collection tools, such as private UAVs. Police will have access to urban security camera footage showing MUYs moving barricade materials into position—a normal prerequisite to a flash mob riot intended to stop traffic. Tip-offs to the vigilantes will be common, and where the networks are still functioning, citizens may still be able to access some video feeds. Sometimes, police will even join the SAV teams, incognito and off-duty, blurring the teams into so-called “death squads.”<blockquote></blockquote>
The operation I will describe (and it’s only one of dozens that will be tried) uses two ordinary pickup trucks and eight fighters. Two riflemen are lying prone in the back of each truck, facing rearward, with removable canvas covers concealing their presence. Their semi-automatic, scoped rifles are supported at their front ends on bipods for very accurate shooting. A row of protective sandbags a foot high is between them and the raised tailgate.<blockquote></blockquote>
In the cab are a driver and a spotter in the passenger seat who also serves as the vehicle’s 360-degree security. The two trucks don’t ever appear on the same stretch of road, but coordinate their movements using one-word brevity codes over small FRS walkie-talkie radios. Each truck has a series of predetermined elevated locations where the intersection in question will lie between 200 and 500 yards away. Each truck is totally nondescript and forgettable, the only detail perhaps being the non-MUY ethnicity of the suburbanite driver and spotter driving relatively near to a riot in progress.
<blockquote></blockquote>
By the time the two SAV pickup trucks arrive at their firing positions on different streets and oriented ninety degrees to one another, the flash mob riot is in full swing. A hundred or more of the rampaging youths are posturing and throwing debris into traffic in order to intimidate some cars into stopping. The riflemen in the backs of the pickups are waiting for this moment and know what to expect, trusting their spotters and drivers to give them a good firing lane. The spotters in each truck issue a code word on their radios when they are in final position. The tailgates are swung down, and the leader among the riflemen initiates the firing. All-around security is provided by the driver and spotter.<blockquote></blockquote>
Lying prone and using their bipods for support, the shooters have five to ten degrees of pan or traverse across the entire intersection. Individual rioters are clearly visible in the shooters’ magnified optical scopes. Each of the four snipers has a plan to shoot from the outside of the mob toward the middle, driving participants into a panicked mass. The left-side shooters start on the left side and work to the middle, engaging targets with rapid fire, about one aimed shot per two seconds. Since the two trucks are set at ninety degrees to one another, very complete coverage will be obtained, even among and between the stopped vehicles.<blockquote></blockquote>
The result is a turkey shoot. One magazine of thirty aimed shots per rifle is expended in under a minute, a coded cease-fire is called on the walkie-talkies, and the trucks drive away at the speed limit. The canvas covering the truck beds contains the shooters’ spent brass. If the trucks are attacked from medium or close range, the canvas can be thrown back and the two snipers with their semi-automatic rifles or carbines will add their firepower to that of the driver and spotter.<blockquote></blockquote>
Back at the intersection, complete panic breaks out among the rioters as a great number of bullets have landed in human flesh. Over a score have been killed outright, and many more scream in pain for medical attention they will not receive in time. The sniper ambush stops the flash mob cold in its tracks as the uninjured flee in terror, leaving their erstwhile comrades back on the ground bleeding. The commuters trapped in their vehicles may have an opportunity to escape.<blockquote></blockquote>
This type of sniper ambush and a hundred variations on the theme will finally accomplish what the police could not: put an end to mobs of violent rioters making the cities through-streets and highways impassible killing zones. Would-be rioters will soon understand it to be suicidal to cluster in easily visible groups and engage in mob violence, as the immediate response could come at any time in the form of aimed fire from hundreds of yards away. Even one rifleman with a scoped semi-auto can break up a medium-sized riot.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Many citizens will take to carrying rifles and carbines in their vehicles, along with their pistols, so that if their cars are trapped in an ambush they will have a chance to fight their way out. If their vehicle is stopped outside the immediate area of the flash mob, they will be able to direct accurate fire at the rioters from a few hundred yards away. Inside the fatal hundred-yard radius, unlucky suburbanite drivers and passengers pulled from their cars will still be brutally violated, but the occurrences of large mob-driven street ambushes will be much less frequent once long-range retaliation becomes a frequent expectation.<blockquote></blockquote>
THE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO VIGILANTISM<blockquote></blockquote>
Where they will be unable to respond swiftly or effectively to the outbreaks of street riots by MUY flash mobs, the police and federal agents will respond vigorously to the deadly but smaller vigilante attacks. These sniper ambushes and other SAV attacks will be called acts of domestic terrorism and mass murder by government officials and the mainstream media. A nearly seamless web of urban and suburban street cameras will reveal some of the SAV teams by their vehicles, facial recognition programs, and other technical means. Some early arrests will be made, but the vigilantes will adapt to increasing law enforcement pressure against them by becoming cleverer about their camouflage, most often using stolen cars and false uniforms and masks during their direct-action missions. Observe Mexico today for ideas on how this type of dirty war is fought.<blockquote></blockquote>
Eventually, the U.S. Army itself might be called upon to put out all the social firestorms in our cities, restore order and security, pacify the angry masses, feed the starving millions, get vital infrastructure operating again, and do it all at once in a dozen American Beiruts, Sarajevos and Mogadishus.<blockquote></blockquote>
Good luck to them, I say.<blockquote></blockquote>
A few hundred “Active IRA” tied down thousands of British troops in one corner of a small island for decades. The same ratios have served the Taliban well over the past decade while fighting against the combined might of NATO. Set aside for a moment the angry starving millions trapped in the urban areas, and the dire security issues arising thereof. Just to consider the official reaction to vigilantism separately, it’s unlikely that any conceivable combinations of local and state police, federal law enforcement, National Guard or active-duty Army actions could neutralize or eliminate tens of thousands of former special operations troops intent on providing their own form of security. Millions of Americans are already far better armed and trained than a few hundred IRA or Taliban ever were. And the police and Army would not be operating from secure fire bases, their families living in total safety thousands of miles away in a secure rear area. In this scenario, there is no rear area, and every family member, anywhere, would be at perpetual risk of reprisal actions by any of the warring sides.
<blockquote></blockquote>
In this hyper-dangerous environment, new laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in vehicles would be ignored as the illegitimate diktat of dictatorship, just when the Second Amendment is needed more than ever. Police or military conducting searches for firearms at checkpoints would themselves become targets of vigilante snipers. Serving on anti-firearms duty would be seen as nothing but pure treason by millions of Americans who took the oath to defend the Constitution, including the Bill of Rights. Politicians who did not act in the security interest of their local constituents as a result of political correctness or other reasons would also be targeted.<blockquote></blockquote>
A festering race war with police and the military in the middle taking fire from both sides could last for many years, turning many American cities into a living hell. Remember history: when the British Army landed in Northern Ireland in 1969, they were greeted with flowers and applause from the Catholics. The Tommys were welcomed as peacekeepers who would protect them from Protestant violence. That soon changed. Likewise with our tragic misadventure in Lebanon back in 1982 and 1983. Well-intended referees often find themselves taking fire from all sides. It’s as predictable as tomorrow’s sunrise. Why would it be any different when the U.S. Army is sent to Los Angeles, Chicago or Philadelphia to break apart warring ethnic factions?
<blockquote></blockquote>
For a long time after these events, it will be impossible for the warring ethnic groups to live together or even to mingle peacefully. Too much rage and hatred will have been built up on all sides of our many American multi-ethnic fault lines. The new wounds will be raw and painful for many years to come, as they were in the South for long after the Civil War. The fracturing of the urban areas, divided by no-man’s-lands, will also hinder economic redevelopment for many years because the critical infrastructure corridors will remain insecure.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Eventually, high concrete “Peace Walls” like those in Belfast, Northern Ireland, will be installed where the different ethnic groups live in close proximity. That is, if recovery to sane and civilized norms of behavior are ever regained in our lifetimes and we don’t slide into a new Dark Age, a stern and permanent tyranny, warlordism, anarchy, or any other dire outcome.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Dark Ages can last for centuries, after sinking civilizations in a vicious, downward vortex. “When the music’s over, turn out the lights,” to quote Jim Morrison of The Doors. Sometimes the lights stay out for a long time. Sometimes civilization itself is lost. Millions of EBT cards flashing zeroes might be the signal event of a terrible transformation.<blockquote></blockquote>
It is a frightening thing to crystallize the possible outbreak of mass starvation and racial warfare into words, so that the mind is forced to confront agonizingly painful scenarios. It is much easier to avert one’s eyes and mind from the ugliness with politically correct Kumbaya bromides. In this grim essay, I am describing a brutal situation of ethnic civil war not differing much from the worst scenes from recent history in Rwanda, South Africa, Mexico, Bosnia, Iraq, and many other places that have experienced varying types and degrees of societal collapse. We all deplore the conditions that might drive us toward such a hellish outcome, and we should work unceasingly to return America to the path of true brotherhood, peace and prosperity. Race hustlers of every stripe should be condemned.<blockquote></blockquote>
Most of us wish we could turn back the calendar to Norman Rockwell’s America. But we cannot, for that America is water long over the dam and gone from our sight, if not from our memories. John Adams said, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” If that is true, judging by current and even accelerating cultural shifts, we might already have passed the point of no return.<blockquote></blockquote>
The prudent American will trim his sails accordingly.
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-32172673446989306462012-08-01T12:31:00.000-07:002012-08-01T12:31:29.404-07:00What Kills Civilisations and Nationhttp://rense.com/general95/canamer.html
<blockquote></blockquote>
It happened to the Romans. It happened to the American Indians. It happened to the Incas of South America. It happened to the aborigines of Australia. It happened to South Africans. It’s happening to Great Britain, Norway, Sweden, Holland, Belgium, Australia, France and Spain.<blockquote></blockquote>
It is happening to the United States of America.<blockquote></blockquote>
What is “it”?<blockquote></blockquote>
All those ancient civilizations experienced migration of other civilizations so great in numbers that “it” changed their languages, religions, cultures and ways of life.<blockquote></blockquote>
The Romans lost their empire. The American Indians lost everything and found themselves stuck on internment camps better known as “reservations.” Today, they cope with alcohol, domestic violence, poverty and purposelessness. The Spaniard Pizarro, using his guns, degraded the Inca nation into oblivion. The Australian aboriginals, like the American Indians, lost their continent to the British invasion. The same happened with South Africa.<blockquote></blockquote>
Today, Great Britain, by its own hand, watches itself change from “British” to Middle Eastern Islamic right before its eyes. The same goes for Norway, Sweden, Holland, Belgium, France, Canada, Australia and Spain.<blockquote></blockquote>
While academics and social elites call it “multiculturalism and diversity”, such numbers of humanity racing into first world countries—flood host countries with incompatible cultures, religions and sheer numbers.<blockquote></blockquote>
But today, another aspect of mass migration percolates to the surface, but nobody wants to talk about it much less deal with it. Top leaders of every country avoid addressing it at all costs. Average citizens don’t know it exists much less understand its growing ramifications.<blockquote></blockquote>
For example, Great Britain today, already crowded beyond sustainability, houses 61 million people on its tiny islands with a sum total landmass smaller than the State of Oregon. Nonetheless, they continue importing people that will add a projected 11 million additions within two decades. No one will whisper a word about it and no one knows when the additions will stop or if Britain will choose to or be able to stop them. Since the third world adds 80 million people annually, there is no end of the line for the numbers of desperate humanity.<blockquote></blockquote>
Great Britain provides a 21st century rendition of Easter Island’s legendary population debacle back in the 1800s.<blockquote></blockquote>
Holland provides another rendition in that it houses 18 million people in a tiny landmass about 90 miles wide by 180 miles long. They must import everything into their country in order to feed, warm, house and transport themselves. They cannot sustain 18 million people on such a tiny landmass without total dependence on the outside world.<blockquote></blockquote>
Today, China, adding 8.1 million net gain annually, buys farmland in Africa and South America in order to feed its projected addition of 300 million by 2050—a scant 38 years.<blockquote></blockquote>
Can America withstand the coming transformation of itself?<blockquote></blockquote>
In the past 40 years, America endured immigration that added 100 million people by October of 2008 to the lower 48 states. This country, at present rates of mass migration, will add another 100 million people by 2035. We will add another 38 million on top of that by 2050. Total: 438 million from our current 315 million. (Sources: PEW Hispanic Center, “US Population Projections” Fogel/Martin, US Census Bureau)<blockquote></blockquote>
On July 11, 2012, ABC’s anchor Diane Sawyer reported on New York adding two to five million more residents in the coming decades. She said that 300 square foot apartments would be the norm of the future. A 300 square foot apartment equals the size of two car parking spaces. Is this the kind of transformation we want as individuals and communities? Do we want to repeat Rome’s path? Great Britain’s? China’s? India’s? Mexico’s?<blockquote></blockquote>
How will adding another 100 million people within 38 years help our water, energy, resources, standard of living and quality of life?<blockquote></blockquote>
If allowed to proceed, this transformation will affect every aspect of our freedom, quality of life, environment and the planet itself. None of it positive!<blockquote></blockquote>
"Unlimited population growth cannot be sustained; you cannot sustain growth in the rates of consumption of resources. No species can overrun the carrying capacity of a finite land mass. This Law cannot be repealed and is not negotiable.” Dr. Albert Bartlett, www.albartlett.org , University of Colorado, USA.
<blockquote></blockquote>
This is not the time to complain or whine. You must engage your congress-critters. Go into their offices. Tell them what you want. This is a Republic and it is up to you to take action by voting the bad ones out and/or running for office yourself. The two top organizations for taking action and making impact are www.NumbersUSA.org and www.CapsWeb.org . Become a phone caller and faxer of pre written letters. It’s up to you.
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-53676661974566286452012-07-26T12:42:00.000-07:002012-07-26T12:42:06.067-07:00My Theory On Race As Speciation Is Provedhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/early-africans-mated-with-mystery-species-of-humans/2012/07/26/gJQAxFzZBX_story.html?Post+generic=%3Ftid%3Dsm_twitter_washingtonpost<blockquote></blockquote>
The human family tree just got another — mysterious — branch, an African “sister species” to the heavy-browed Neanderthals that once roamed Europe.<blockquote></blockquote>
While no fossilized bones have been found from these enigmatic people, they did leave a calling card in present-day Africans: snippets of foreign DNA.<blockquote></blockquote>
There’s only way one that genetic material could have made it into modern human populations.<blockquote></blockquote>
“Geneticists like euphemisms, but we’re talking about sex,” said Joshua Akey of the University of Washington in Seattle, whose lab identified the foreign DNA in three groups of modern Africans.<blockquote></blockquote>
These genetic leftovers do not resemble DNA from any modern-day humans. The foreign DNA also does not resemble Neanderthal DNA, which shows up in the DNA of some modern-day Europeans, Akey said. That means the newly identified DNA came from an unknown group.
<blockquote></blockquote>
“We’re calling this a Neanderthal sibling species in Africa,” Akey said. He added that the interbreeding likely occurred 20,000 to 50,000 years ago, long after some modern humans had walked out of Africa to colonize Asia and Europe, and around the same time Neanderthals were waning in Europe.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Akey said that present-day Europeans show no evidence of the foreign DNA, meaning the mystery people were likely confined to Africa.<blockquote></blockquote>
The find offers more evidence that for thousands of years, modern-looking humans shared the Earth with evolutionary cousins that later died out. And whenever the groups met, they did what came naturally — they bred.<blockquote></blockquote>
The once controversial idea that humans mated with other species is now widely accepted among scientists. In fact, hominid hanky-panky seems to have occurred wherever humans met others who looked kind of like them.<blockquote></blockquote>
In 2010, researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany announced finding Neanderthal DNA in the genomes of modern Europeans.<blockquote></blockquote>
Heavy-set people whose thick double brows, broad noses, and flat faces set them apart from modern humans, Neanderthals disappeared around 25,000 to 30,000 years ago.<blockquote></blockquote>
Another mysterious group of extinct people recently identified from a finger bone in Siberia — known as the Denisovans — also left some of their DNA in modern day Pacific Islanders.<blockquote></blockquote>
And while modern humans and the newly found “archaic” Africans might be classified as distinct species, they managed to produce viable offspring. Likewise, donkeys and horses, lions and tigers, and whales and dolphins can mate and make babies.
<blockquote></blockquote>
“They had to be similar enough in appearance to anatomically modern humans that reproduction would happen,” said Akey. But with no fossils in hand, it’s impossible to say what these people looked like. It’s also impossible to say whether the matings were consensual or forced.<blockquote></blockquote>
But one thing is clear: This enigmatic group left their DNA all across Africa. The researchers found it in the forest-dwelling pygmies of central Africa and in two groups of hunter-gatherers on the other side of the continent — the Hadza and Sandawe people of Tanzania.<blockquote></blockquote>
Starting a decade ago, a team led by Sarah Tishkoff of the University of Pennsylvania drew blood from five individuals in each of the three groups. Using the latest genetic technology, Tishkoff spent $150,000 to read, or sequence, the DNA of these 15 people.<blockquote></blockquote>
Besides finding evidence of the now-extinct species, the team discovered a huge range of genetic diversity between the three groups. The human genome contains about three billions letters, or base pairs, of DNA. Before this study, scientists had found that some 40 million of these letters vary across human populations.<blockquote></blockquote>
But in the 15 Africans, Tishkoff found another three million genetic variants — a huge trove of human diversity. Among this stunning variety, Tishkoff says she has pinpointed some of the genes responsible for the short stature of the pygmies, who average less than five feet in height. She also found that immune system genes and genes for taste and smell varied wildly between the three groups — confirming Africa as the seat of the most human diversity.<blockquote></blockquote>
The research was reported Wednesday in the journal Cell.<blockquote></blockquote>
“This is very cutting-edge population genetics work,” said geneticist Spencer Wells, a National Geographic explorer. “This ‘whole genome’ analysis the team performed is really revolutionizing our understanding of human history. It’s an exciting time to be in the field, but it’s difficult to interpret all the new data.”<blockquote></blockquote>
Wells said the oldest modern human skull, found in Ethiopia, dates to 195,000 years ago. For more than 150,000 years, then, humans shared the planet with cousin species.<blockquote></blockquote>
Despite all the amorous advances, though, only one group survived — us.<blockquote></blockquote>
Akey said: “As we were conquering the world, we also conquered similar human populations that were dying out.”
<blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-80389930191092843522012-07-26T01:43:00.000-07:002012-07-26T01:43:44.601-07:00Is This What British Soldiers Died For ?<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/al-qaeda/9426488/The-Islamist-terror-that-links-Syria-and-Iraq.html
<blockquote></blockquote>
The modern-day states of Iraq and Syria once formed the ancient kingdom of Mesopotamia. They share the same tribal culture, heritage and a lengthy border. It is hardly surprising, then, that they still have much in common.<blockquote></blockquote>
Having both been ruled by Hashemite kings following their creation as independent states in the aftermath of the First World War, they became the only Arab states to adopt the Ba’ath party’s revolutionary ideology and were renowned for their hostility to the West.<blockquote></blockquote>
While on occasion this relationship has become somewhat frayed, not least when the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein declared his desire to unite both regimes under his barbaric rule in the Seventies, the ties that exist between Baghdad and Damascus have ensured that such unpleasant memories are soon overcome.<blockquote></blockquote>
Now these two Arab states can boast yet another, less welcome, characteristic that binds them together: they have both become targets for al-Qaeda’s new generation of Islamist jihadists.
<blockquote></blockquote>
At first glance, it appears that the bombers responsible for the recent attacks in Damascus and Baghdad were motivated by very different objectives.
Related Articles
<blockquote></blockquote>
In Syria, last week’s carefully executed bombing of the National Security headquarters, which killed President Bashar al-Assad’s brother-in-law, as well as the country’s defence minister, was in all probability the act of groups working for the Free Syrian Army, a mainly Sunni Muslim force that is seeking to overthrow Assad’s minority Allawite regime, which has ruled the country for more than four decades.<blockquote></blockquote>
In Baghdad, on the other hand, the recent well-coordinated series of bombings and shootings against a number of government targets in 15 different cities and towns was carried out by Iraqi Sunni extremists. Many of them are disaffected members of Saddam’s Ba’athist tyranny who are trying to force the government of Nouri al-Maliki, Iraq’s Shi’ite Muslim prime minister, to establish a more inclusive regime, one that represents the interests of the Sunni and Kurdish minorities, rather than simply feathering the nests of the majority Shi’ite Muslim population.<blockquote></blockquote>
But while the objectives of these anti-government activists may differ, there is a chilling similarity in the tactics they employ in their respective quarrels with the ruling cliques in Iraq and Syria.
<blockquote></blockquote>
In both countries, the recent wave of bombings bears all the hallmarks of al-Qaeda terror cells, both in terms of their planning and the execution. Indeed, the group responsible for the Iraqi bombings, al-Qaeda in Iraq, makes no secret of its allegiance to the organisation originally founded by Osama bin Laden.
<blockquote></blockquote>
In a statement issued shortly after the attacks, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who claims to be the leader of the Iraqi cell, deliberately sought to link the violence in Iraq to the Sunni revolt in neighbouring Syria. According to al-Baghdadi, al-Qaeda has launched a campaign it calls “Breaking Down the Walls”, whereby it aims to overthrow the established governments in Baghdad and Damascus and replace them with regimes more in tune with the group’s strict Islamist agenda.
<blockquote></blockquote>
This might seem far-fetched, particularly as al-Qaeda has already suffered one humiliating defeat in Iraq: moderate Sunni tribal leaders refused to support the terrorist group’s extremist agenda and helped US forces to defeat it by forming the “Anbar Awakening” in 2006. Iraqi Sunnis might want to see a more representative government running Baghdad, but most of them have no desire for a return of the appalling scenes of sectarian violence that devastated the country from 2006 to 2007.<blockquote></blockquote>
And yet the fact that al-Qaeda, which was effectively destroyed as an organisation in Iraq by the end of 2007, is back with a vengeance is a direct result of the violence taking place in neighbouring Syria. Even before last week’s attack on the National Security building, senior Iraqi officials had expressed concern about the existence of a number of al-Qaeda cells in the eastern city of Fallujah, which were travelling freely across the Syrian border to support the rebel cause. Now it appears that these cells are travelling in the opposite direction from Syria to Iraq, with all the potentially disastrous implications that could have for regional stability.<blockquote></blockquote>
Until now the priority of Western policy-makers has been to stop the fighting in Syria on humanitarian grounds. But a conflict that has so far claimed more than 17,000 Syrian lives could easily reach levels not seen since the worst days of Iraq’s sectarian violence – if, as now seems possible, the turbulence spreads beyond Syria’s borders. Rather than treating Syria as a humanitarian crisis, the West should see its troubles as a threat to the stability of the entire region, and act accordingly.
<blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-22166020737287256092012-07-09T10:30:00.001-07:002012-07-09T10:30:53.870-07:00Northern Europeans The First Americans<blockquote>
</blockquote>
In a discovery that could rewrite the history of the Americas, archaeologists have found a number of stone tools dating back between 19,000 and 26,000 years, and bearing remarkable similarities to those made in Europe.<blockquote></blockquote>
All of the ancient implements were discovered along the north-east coast of the USA.<blockquote></blockquote>
The tools could reassert the long dismissed and discredited claim that Europeans in the form of Christopher Columbus and his crew were the first to discover the New World.<blockquote></blockquote>
Previous discoveries of tools have only been dated back to 15,000 years ago and prompted many archaeologists and historians to question claims that stone-age man managed to migrate to North America.<blockquote></blockquote>
But the striking resemblance in the way the primitive American tools were made to European ones dating from the same period now suggests a remarkable migration took place.<blockquote></blockquote>
Adding to the weight of evidence is fresh analysis of stone knife unearthed in the US in 1971 that revealed it was made of French flint.<blockquote></blockquote>
Professor Dennis Stanford from Washington's Smithsonian Institution, and Professor Bruce Bradley from Exeter University believe that the ancient Europeans travelled to North America across an Atlantic frozen over by the Ice Age.<blockquote></blockquote>
During the height of the Ice Age, ice covered some three million square miles of the North Atlantic, providing a solid bridge between the two continents. Plentiful numbers of seal, penguins, seabirds and the now extinct great auk on the edge of the ice shelf could have provided the stone-age nomads with enough food to sustain them on their 1,500-mile walk.<blockquote></blockquote>
"Across Atlantic Ice", a book by professors Stanford and Bradley presenting the case for the trans-Atlantic trek, is published next month. <blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-84702597892758288562012-06-27T13:11:00.003-07:002012-06-27T13:11:57.668-07:00The Republic Is Born.<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh98j6dOXABXSXBV3GwiqMFqbCQ-0XHMM8HCRvQBIAkdwxzCLOcV_jZp-uWeu7ZsvAfGPnpIMcNNX0s7pyYZGr8hj-FwoHwQSGtgUM41mKcCgk6dfntwRA3BEHegF5xKAT-1z6Nt_HRhKia/s1600/queen.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left:1em; margin-right:1em"><img border="0" height="194" width="259" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh98j6dOXABXSXBV3GwiqMFqbCQ-0XHMM8HCRvQBIAkdwxzCLOcV_jZp-uWeu7ZsvAfGPnpIMcNNX0s7pyYZGr8hj-FwoHwQSGtgUM41mKcCgk6dfntwRA3BEHegF5xKAT-1z6Nt_HRhKia/s400/queen.jpg" /></a></div>
<blockquote></blockquote>
The moment the Queen shook McGuniness's hand was historic and symbolic.<blockquote></blockquote>
It will be seen by history as the moment we became a Republic and the Monarchy fell.<blockquote></blockquote>
It will take a few more decades to happen, but the line has been crossed.<blockquote></blockquote>
The moment the Queen shook that murdering terrorists hand was the moment the Monarchy confirmed its utter irrelevance.<blockquote></blockquote>
That betrayal by the Queen is the birth of the British Republic. <blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-2930480415823453232012-06-09T07:19:00.000-07:002012-06-09T07:19:41.568-07:00The New IQ Elite<blockquote></blockquote>
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100163885/a-new-global-elite-is-on-the-march/
<blockquote></blockquote>
Have you come across “OES syndrome”? The letters stand for Overeducated Elitist Snob, and if you don’t know what that means let me draw your attention to the front benches of the House of Commons.<blockquote></blockquote>
OES syndrome is an American term, coined by the US political scientist Charles Murray to describe the clustering of wealth, power and – crucially – intelligence at one end of the social spectrum. Murray’s new book Coming Apart: The State of White America is not as controversial as The Bell Curve, the 1994 volume in which he and Richard Herrnstein compared race and IQ. But its conclusions are every bit as alarming.
<blockquote></blockquote>
A hundred years ago, says Murray, most Americans in the top five per cent of cognitive ability had ordinary occupations. They were very clever shopkeepers, farmers, housewives and factory workers. But they didn’t somersault over their peers.
<blockquote></blockquote>
One reason is that they couldn’t marry very smart people. High intelligence was scattered evenly across America, so a gifted farm worker might have to travel 100 miles before he met a woman as bright as he was. Instead, he married an ordinary local girl, and their children, regressing to the mean, were only slightly cleverer than their schoolfriends.
<blockquote></blockquote>
The explosion of college education changed that. Universities plucked bright kids out of their home towns like a tornado and suddenly they found that they weren’t in Kansas any more. Young people hooked up with equally intelligent partners and passed on two sets of smart genes.
<blockquote></blockquote>
This mobility opened up Ivy League universities to competition from ultra-bright candidates. The old-money aristocracy at Harvard, Yale and Princeton shrank, but the average IQ at those universities soared – and with it the earning potential of alumni. The newly elite students married each other and the result, says Murray, is a hard core of Overeducated Elitist Snobs.<blockquote></blockquote>
Members of this supercharged class don’t just separate themselves from the poor: they’re quarantined from “everybody who isn’t as rich and well educated as they are”. They also produce clever, rich children by marrying brains and money (which go together these days).<blockquote></blockquote>
Remind you of anybody? We may tease David Cameron and George Osborne for being “toffs”, but they’re more than that. Although both inherited money, they’re also furiously ambitious academic snobs of the type Murray describes. In their meritocracy, the purpose of a superior brain is to amass money and power. Intellectual curiosity isn’t encouraged lest it jeopardise that project. Hence the anomaly of a prime minister with a brilliant First from Oxford who has never uttered a truly original thought in public.<blockquote></blockquote>
Let’s not kid ourselves that the elitism of this Oxbridge-educated Coalition will disappear when it loses power. Labour has its own OES syndrome; so do politicians and business leaders from Palo Alto to Beijing. Free market capitalism forces the brightest people to the top. That may sound like good news, but it also creates an association between intelligence and living standards that, in the long run, will condemn stupid people to poverty.
<blockquote></blockquote>
The new marriage patterns do as much harm as good. Once bright people are taken out of the local gene pool, what does that leave? Our natural reaction is to say: “Let’s not go there.” But we really have no choice, because global capitalism is creating a cognitive hierarchy in front of our eyes – and, with it, inequalities just as cruel as the ones we thought we had abolished.
<blockquote></blockquote>
FROM ONE OF THE COMMENTS LEFT ON THE ARTICLE ;
<blockquote></blockquote>
This is much the same argument as I use to assert that the UK was the first nation to become genetically stratified. It happened first because we initiated the Industrial Revolution which brought the bulk of the population from the countryside to towns and cities and opened opportunities for untapped talent outside the landed aristocracy. People marry people similar to themselves; this is called assortative mating.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Genetic stratification is not a caste system. The reason being the regression toward the mean mentioned in the blog. This is a simple and inevitable consequence of characteristics being transmitted as discrete units: genes. Its effect is that on average offspring are less extremely removed from the overall population mean of a characteristic with a metric such as that of height or IQ than their parents. For example, the offspring of the bright tend to be less bright and those of the tall shorter and vice versa in both cases.
<blockquote></blockquote>
The "on average" mentioned above allows for potential variation among offspring such that they may become more extreme than the mean value of a characteristic of their parents. Thus, even the dimmest will produce some offspring closer to the population mean intelligence and a small proportion may greatly exceed this. Of course as nature and nurture influence the expression of a characteristic the offspring of the dimmest may lack much contribution from nurture and social intervention may be required to unlock talent.
<blockquote></blockquote>
The upshot is that a genetically stratified society must be understood as dynamic rather than static. The dynamic upwards and downwards is closer to glacial growth than a fast running stream but it has immense consequences.
<blockquote></blockquote>
This reasoning supports the notion that we should move toward a true meritocracy rather than the lip service currently made. Upward and downward movement should not be partially locked as at present. Keeping talent down is both wasteful and stores up trouble from intelligent people inn the lower social strata: it is those who will become criminal gang leaders or militant trade unionists. Not allowing those of less talent than expected in their class to drift downwards is equally bad. It means that resources, especially inherited wealth, are sequestered away from those who would use them better.<blockquote></blockquote>
So in order to further meritocracy opportunity must be unlocked. This entails radical overhaul of the education system and the introduction of inheritance tax that is no longer effectively optional for the wealthy.<blockquote></blockquote>
Meritocracy should not be construed as dog eat dog in a scramble for wealth. I am not advocating the crass "American Dream". Meritocracy is much more than opportunity to amass wealth according to ability. What it is to do with is encouraging each individual to work hard to develop such talent as he has so that he may find a niche that gives satisfaction whether in workaday life or in the pursuit of family interests and hobbies. Some of the most talented will be drawn to entrepreneurship, others to the learned professions and academe in expectation of a comfortable lifestyle rather than wealth but with the challenge and satisfaction of following their profession most important.
<blockquote></blockquote>
The bottom of the talent pile should be considered too. There is no reason why those performing relatively menial tasks should not be instilled with pride in doing what they do well. There is no reason why they should not be valued and seen to be. Part of that value is reflected through wages. Whilst income differentials are inevitable in a society that values freedom to make one's own way and act as an incentive for achievement the grossly disparate distribution at present is indicative of market-capitalism having been permitted to enter a pathological state whereby opportunity is monopolised by the few; it must be released.<blockquote></blockquote>
What has gone very wrong is that the rat race to wealth, reflected now in the "bonus culture", is regarded as somehow noble, that gross disparities in wealth are as inevitable as winter and that it is every man for himself, may the devil take the hindmost. Those resisting change to the status quo are displaying a selfish short sightedness that is ultimately to their detriment. The words society and community have become ill-defined, misused and sometimes derided. A society is more than the sum of individuals battling for their own interests. There is interdependence that even the most wealthy have to rely on. Some of this is enshrined in our laws.<blockquote></blockquote>
Feelings of fair play arise spontaneously in childhood. When it is perceived to be absent historical precedent shows that nasty consequences can afflict even the most entrenched elites if they don't give grouind. They should bear in mind that so-called property rights are no such thing. They appear on no tablet of stone (not even "thou shalt not steal" is a prescription for how economic wealth should be divided up in the first place) . They are societally defined. Property ownership is in general a good that most people recognise. Yet that should not lead to unquestioning acceptance of present assumptions on how generated wealth should be shared among those who labour and those who can't labour or about how much should be inherited by those who didn't earn it.
<blockquote></blockquote>
The days of the OESs are numbered.
<blockquote></blockquote>
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5680771968888528726.post-63840785816987620812012-06-07T01:41:00.001-07:002012-06-07T01:41:41.767-07:00The Globalist Agenda Revealed.<blockquote></blockquote>
Finally the Globalist Corporate Fascist agenda is revealed - the British Army will be downsized and replaced by cheap foreign mercenaries, the same as the British economy has been globalised and replaced with cheap foreign workers.
<blockquote></blockquote>
This is the globalist corporate agenda exposed - and it is being imposed by traitor filth governments elected by moronic British people at the behest of the globalist media.
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2155593/Slimmed-Army-rely-foreign-mercenaries-fight-Britain-future-wars.html
<blockquote></blockquote>
The Army will have to rely on help from private contractors and foreign soldiers in future wars, the Defence Secretary will announce today.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Several regiments will be axed or merged as the Army downsizes from 102,000 personnel to 82,000 by 2020.<blockquote></blockquote>
Private military contractors, Nato allies and Territorial Army reservists will be employed to plug the gaps, Philip Hammond will say.<blockquote></blockquote>
In a speech to the Royal United Services Institute in London, Mr Hammond will outline plans for paid civilian soldiers to provide ‘logistics support’ for regular front-line soldiers.
<blockquote></blockquote>
He will promise that the UK will maintain ‘teeth’ for any future military operations, but add that others will have to help with key tasks to keep soldiers armed and fed.<blockquote></blockquote>
This could lead to recently retired soldiers being rehired as mercenary contractors to deliver kit to front-line soldiers.<blockquote></blockquote>
Britain could also be forced to rely on other countries for vital transport and logistics tasks, which are currently undertaken by soldiers’ own countrymen.
<blockquote></blockquote>
Mr Hammond will tell the think-tank’s conference on land warfare that the Army will ‘rethink the way we deliver every aspect of military effect in order to maximise capability at the front-line’.<blockquote></blockquote>
He will say Army chiefs are now ‘thinking innovatively about how combat service support is provided, using more systematically the skills available in the reserve and from our contractors.’
<blockquote></blockquote>
He will add that commanders are ‘working closely with partners to operate logistics more rationally through Alliance structures’, as the Army looks ‘to others to provide the tail, where Britain is concentrating on providing the teeth’.<blockquote></blockquote>
The long-mooted cuts to personnel were detailed in the Strategic Defence and Security Review in 2010. However, the plans for greater involvement of private military contractors will fuel fears that the economic crisis will leave the UK saddled with a cut-price Armed Forces, placing our soldiers in danger.<blockquote></blockquote>
Hammond is also braced for a bitter fight over Army reorganisation when he publishes a plan to slash the number of regiments before the summer.<blockquote></blockquote>
The reorganisation of the British Army will reduce numbers from 102,000 to 82,000<blockquote></blockquote>
The reorganisation of the British Army will reduce numbers from 102,000 to 82,000<blockquote></blockquote>
He will pledge to maintain the vital links between regiments and the communities from which they recruit – but he will also acknowledge that some historic cap badges face the axe.<blockquote></blockquote>
He will say: ‘There is no question, of abandoning the regimental system. But that does not mean that we can avoid difficult decisions as the Army gets smaller.<blockquote></blockquote>
‘A regular Army of 82,000 will have a different structure to one of 102,000. And some units inevitably will be lost or will merge. In making those decisions, the military voice must prevail.’
<blockquote></blockquote>
Mr Hammond also wants to beef up the reserves, investing £1.8billion in the TA and doubling the number of members to 38,000. This would leave a total of 120,000 soldiers at commanders’ disposal.<blockquote></blockquote>
Reserve units will be twinned with regular Army regiments, so that members of the TA will train with soldiers they would be deployed alongside.<blockquote></blockquote>
Mr Hammond will say his Army 2020 proposals provide ‘the opportunity to transform the role of reserve forces’.<blockquote></blockquote>
He will continue: ‘The future reserves must be structured to provide, as they do today, some niche specialists capabilities that aren’t cost-effective to maintain on a full-time basis – for example in areas of cyber, medical, or intelligence.<blockquote></blockquote>
‘The integrated Army concept means that light infantry battalions will be reinforced on deployment through a permanent partnership with reserve battalions.’<blockquote></blockquote>
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2155593/Slimmed-Army-rely-foreign-mercenaries-fight-Britain-future-wars.html#ixzz1x5w2lTBN
<a href="http://technorati.com/faves?sub=addfavbtn&add=http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/pix/fave/btn-fave2.png" alt="Add to Technorati Favorites" /></a>Defender of Libertyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16093052197059748663noreply@blogger.com0