Tuesday, 4 August 2009

The 911 Saudi / BAE Nexus Becomes Clear

Interesting news from Saudi Arabia that a CIA asset in the royasl family, Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan, has been arrested for initiating a coup against the monarch using 200 members of the security services - and from this we can deduce that these are the saudi security network that assisted the 911 terrorists with money and training to undertake the attack.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=102313§ionid=351020205

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=112832.0;wap2

Now we know who was the 911 Saudi contact man and also the members of the security services he used to run the 911 hijackers. The utter arrogance of the man to send money via his wife direct to the 911 hijackers to pay for their flight training costs is proof that the conspirators thought they were above the law.

A man who is prepared to initiate a coup against his own family for money and power is a man more than capable of organising the 911 hijackers.


http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=102313§ionid=351020205

What is shocking is that not only is Princess Haifa the husband of the Saudi Prince Bandar who directly passed funds to the 911 hijackers passed to her from the BAE slush fund ( worth tens of billions of dollars) that derived from the Al-Yamamah arms deal.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7244051.stm

http://www.armedforces-int.com/news/2008/04/10/sfos-bae-systems-inquiry-drop-unlawful-high-court.asp

The astonishing fact that a British company BAE through its illegal slush fund to bribe members of the Saudi royal family to award them contracts for amrs deals were the ones who funded the 911 hijackers via Princess Haifa is something the British media refuse to even mention. Yet it is a fact.


http://visibility911.com/jongold/?p=137

Late 1990s: CIA Director Tenet Has Direct, Private Channels to Saudi Leaders
George Tenet, appointed as CIA director in 1997, develops close personal relationships with top Saudi officials, especially Prince Bandar, the Saudi ambassador to the US. Tenet develops a habit of meeting with Bandar at his home near Washington about once a month. But CIA officers handling Saudi issues complain that Tenet doesn’t tell them what he discusses with Bandar. Often they are only able to learn about Tenet’s deals with the Saudis later and through Saudi contacts, not from their own boss. Tenet also makes one of his closest aides the chief of the CIA station in Saudi Arabia. This aide often communicates directly with Tenet, avoiding the usual chain of command. Apparently as a favor to the Saudis, CIA analysts are discouraged from writing reports raising questions about the Saudi relationship to Islamic extremists. [Risen, 2006, pp. 185]


April 1998: Hijacker Associate Receives Saudi Money; FBI Fails to Investigate
Osama Basnan, a Saudi living in California, claims to write a letter to Saudi Arabian Prince Bandar bin Sultan and his wife, Princess Haifa bint Faisal, asking for financial help because his wife needs thyroid surgery. The Saudi embassy sends Basnan $15,000 and pays the surgical bill. However, according to University of California at San Diego hospital records, Basnan’s wife, Majeda Dweikat, is not treated until April 2000. [Los Angeles Times, 11/24/2002] Basnan will later come under investigation for possibly using some of this money to support two of the 9/11 hijackers who arrive in San Diego, although the 9/11 Commission has concluded that evidence does not support these charges. [9/11 Commission, 6/16/2004] Prior to this time, the FBI had several chances to investigate Basnan, but failed to do so. In 1992, they received information suggesting a connection between him and a militant group later associated with bin Laden. In 1993, they received reports that Basnan hosted a party for al-Qaeda leader Sheikh Omar Abdul-Rahman the year before, but again they failed to investigate. [US Congress, 7/24/2003 pdf file] According to one US official, Basnan later “celebrate[s] the heroes of September 11” and talks about “what a wonderful, glorious day it had been” at a party shortly after 9/11. [Newsweek, 11/24/2002; San Diego Magazine, 9/2003]

December 4, 1999: Saudi Ambassador’s Wife Gives Funds that Are Possibly Passed to 9/11 Hijackers

Princess Haifa bint Faisal, the wife of Prince Bandar, the Saudi ambassador to the US, begins sending monthly cashier’s checks of between $2,000 and $3,500 (accounts differ) to Majeda Dweikat, the Jordanian wife of Osama Basnan, a Saudi living in San Diego. Accounts also differ over when the checks were first sent (between November 1999 and about March 2000; a Saudi government representative has stated December 4, 1999 [Fox News, 11/23/2002] ). Basnan’s wife signs many of the checks over to her friend Manal Bajadr, the wife of Omar al-Bayoumi. The payments are made through Riggs Bank, a bank which appears to have turned a blind eye to Saudi embassy transaction and also has longstanding ties to covert CIA operations (see July 2003). [Newsweek, 11/22/2002; Newsweek, 11/24/2002; Guardian, 11/25/2002; Washington Times, 11/26/2002] Some later suggest that the money from the wife of the Saudi ambassador passes through the al-Bayoumi and Basnan families as intermediaries and ends up in the hands of the two hijackers. The payments from Princess Haifa continue until May 2002 and may total $51,000, or as much as $73,000. [Newsweek, 11/22/2002; MSNBC, 11/27/2002] While living in the San Diego area, al-Bayoumi and Basnan are heavily involved in helping with the relocation of, and offering financial support to, Saudi immigrants in the community. [Los Angeles Times, 11/24/2002] In late 2002, al-Bayoumi claims he did not pass any money along to the hijackers. [Washington Times, 12/4/2002] Basnan has variously claimed to know al-Bayoumi, not to know him at all, or to know him only vaguely. [ABC News, 11/25/2002; Arab News, 11/26/2002; ABC News, 11/26/2002; MSNBC, 11/27/2002] However, earlier reports say Basnan and his wife were “very good friends” of al-Bayoumi and his wife. Both couples lived at the Parkwood Apartments at the same time as the two hijackers; prior to that, the couples lived together in a different apartment complex. In addition, the two wives were arrested together in April 2001 for shoplifting. [San Diego Union-Tribune, 10/22/2002]




















Add to Technorati Favorites

1 comment:

  1. Your article clearly shows that your background is from an ethnic group that does NOT view Saudis, Arabs, or any Muslim as a potentially good person. A land grabber usually have the same attitude and would make up reasons to velify the opponent. In my opinion, those who participated in 9/11 would NOT have changed their plan just because they ran out of cash. And, what they did, did not require that much money to begin with. The people who would benefit from such crazy ideas are not the Saudis, but people who for some stupid and arrogant reason, hate them.

    ReplyDelete