The release of information that reveals that Nick Griffin was the one of the most hard working MEP's in the North of England proves two things ;
1) That Griffin should concentrate on being an MEP as he appears to be good at the role
2) That by spending all the time he has done in Europe instead of giving due attention to the BNP in Britain, that the present problems in the party prove that he has taken his eye off the ball in relation to what the BNP needs.
I asked Griffin in my resignation e mail to stand down as BNP leader and concentrate on his role as an MEP, as by doing so he will stand a good chance of being elected again and at the same time allow the party to rebrand itself and appeal to a far wider percentage of the population.
The party and activists who got him elected as an MEP and his constituents all deserve an MEP who dedicates themselves fully to the role.
Instead he appointed himself London Organiser as well as Chairman and MEP and now runs the BNP, oversees London as its organiser and also acts as an MEP.
That is simpy arrogance.
The ongoing collapse of the BNP has been caused by Griffin being too greedy with power and centralising power around himself, or around his incompetent lackeys whose positions are based solely on them being his trusted acolytes, not any merit.
If Griffin had an ounce of humility, instead of the tonnes of arrogance he lugs around with him, he would realise that each of those roles he has assumed for himself demands full time attention, not part time attention.
If Griffin resigned as chairman, held the investigations required into the financial allegations and Shelley Rose and other disturbing allegations concerning other female BNP members, re-appointed the unlawfully suspended BNP activists and officers and concentrated on his role as an MEP full time - then I would be delighted.
Instead he continues to act as the arrogant dictator, expelling and suspending anyone who dares offer him any common sense - and thereby proving to everyone his unsuitability to remain as the BNP chairman.
The party is rebranding itself. Now the gloves are off and the BNP will be clearly an ethnic nationalist party, with no concessions whatsoever to civic nationalism! We don't care to soften our message as we can see that only attracts traitors and fools that are a liability. The liberal baggage was too heavy to bear. I believe you and the reformists unintentionally woke up the lion. Just watch now. Ha!
ReplyDeleteThe BNP under Griffin is both bankrupt and unelectable. The Butler camp would be much better off starting another party. The new party would provide a home for all the disillusioned BNP members, activists and councillors who no longer want to serve under Griffin. The new party would hit the ground running.
ReplyDeleteLearn from Geert Wilders. In 2005 he split from The Peoples Party for Freedom and Democracy and formed The Freedom Party. In just 5 years his party now has 5 MEPs and 24 seats in the Dutch Parliament.
The Freedom Party is a good name for a political party and it's currently available. Adrian Davies Freedom Party is no longer registered with the electoral commission.
If you think the BNP is going to re-brand itself under Griffin you are a fool.
ReplyDeleteIt cannot do so, as Griffin is seen as the party in the eyes of the public.
As for this rebrand as an 'ethnic nationalist party' eerrr how are you going to do that when the EHRC HAS FORCED THE BNP TO BECOME A CIVIC NATIONALIST PARTY !!!!!!!
Rajinder Singh is a member now and other ethnic minorities, are you gonna 'white them up' with some white face paint.
There is no BNP lion.
All the lions have left, all that are left now are sycophants and fools and patriots / nationalists in denial hoping for the best, and fearing the worst for the party.
Sounds like the Judean Peoples front scene from Life of Brian.
ReplyDeleteAt the end of the day, maybe Party politics isn't a good idea.
What has gone wrong is largely to do with the leadership of Patries becoming captured by the Globalists.
We'd be far better off if the public voted in independents, they aint going to do that until the traditional parties are thoroughly discredited.
They want to destroy and fracture the Nationalist movement, then how about letting them, work as independents or smaller Parties, do deals at election time not to work against each other.
Just an idea.
Get well soon Donna.
Excellent suggestion and point made.
ReplyDelete"Learn from Geert Wilders. In 2005 he split from The Peoples Party for Freedom and Democracy and formed The Freedom Party. In just 5 years his party now has 5 MEPs and 24 seats in the Dutch Parliament.
The Freedom Party is a good name for a political party and it's currently available. Adrian Davies Freedom Party is no longer registered with the electoral commission."
Maybe we should start from scratch again and resurrect British Union. As for Griffin I hear he will be taking his holidays in North Korea this year and members will now have to address him as 'Dear Chairman' or some other cult like designation. Can you imagine what he would be like inpower? God help us all.
ReplyDeleteThe BNP has always been an ethnic nationalist party, but also has tolerated civic nationalism too much - for fear of losing some of these wimps and fools. But now the wimps have shown their poisonous nature, colluding with the Butler traitors mostly out of naivity. At the Summer school the decision to drop the crap was officially announced. And it's full steam ahead. The non whites in the party are not accepted as indigenous Brits but as civic nationals who are expected to be in favour of Brits having ethnic nationalism for ourselves. Singh said he wants the English to remain the English. And so he does not expect to become one of the tribe - but a civic citizen.
ReplyDeleteha ha ha ha you are delusional you mug.
ReplyDeletethe fact you still believe anything griffin tells you, the fact you still any have faith in his insanity and bullshit means you are a lost cause.
So griffins idea is to drop civic nationalism and become an ethno-nationalist party and also turn the BNP into a civic nationalist party for all the ethnics in it.
Brilliant.
Its called fucking schizophrenia, you idiot.
Not only is the party split between the nazis and civic nationalists, it will now also be split between the ethnic members and ethno-nationalist whites !
Oh that will work wont it.
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Now goose step off back to the BNP and seig heil Plankton.
Lee, you are still not understanding. The BNP is not turning into a civic nationalist party for anyone. We are not interested at all in representing civic nationalism, we merely recognise that civic nationalism exists and that it is possible for someone to be "civically" British. We don't need to champion their cause whatsoever. The mainstream political establishment already does that. So there is no "schizophrenia".
ReplyDeleteThe EHRC has made us have to accept civic nationals (eg people of various racial origins) into the party, and we are making clear their non ethnically British status.
Interesting that you think recognising this difference defines one as a "Nazi". Very UAF response that!
Dont be deliberatly dense.
ReplyDeleteThe party is split into wings - the far right wing and the moderate wing.
The far right wing want no ethnics in at all, whilst the moderate wing want as many in as possible.
No party can exist with a split like that inside it.
Sooner or later it will split.
The sooner the better, that way we can either rescue the party or create a new one.
"The far right wing want no ethnics in at all, whilst the moderate wing want as many in as possible.
ReplyDeleteNo party can exist with a split like that inside it."
The "moderates" are to be given the chance to understand the meaning of ethno nationalism. They are a liability while they do not support this. That is what we have concluded from the ongoing difficulty. We will lose dead wood.
There is nothing "far right" about the BNP. We are not a Neo Con party. I myself am a socialist.
There does seem to be an odd fusion of the "moderates" such as gay racemixers, and the neo Conservatives amongst the Reform group. There is where you find an impossible contradiction.
Jonothan Bowden (self proclaimed "fascist") and the various miscegenating homosexuals surely have very little common ground?! Mind you Geert Wilders' party does have a similar mix does it not? Might be a clue there even...