The Frankfurt School And The Truth

The origins of the Frankfurt School began with funding provided by the German Jewish Marxist Felix Weil.

1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Weil

Weil had been a student of the German Marxist proffessor Karl Korsch. Who was not Jewish.

Along with György Lukács, Karl Korsch is regarded as one of the major figures responsible for laying the groundwork for Western Marxism in the 1920s.

1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Korsch

Karl Korsch was born in 1886 in Tostedt, near Hamburg in Germany. His father was a successful bank clerk and later a bank manager. Korsch went to school in Thuringia, and to university in Munich, Berlin, Geneva and Jena. Like Walter Benjamin, his first political experiences came as a member of the 'Free Student Movement', a broad, liberal and idealist organisation committed to the idea of transforming education in the interest of students.

On the outbreak of war, in August 1914, Karl Korsch returned to Germany. He claimed to have served in the war, while openly expressing his opposition to it. For this, he was demoted from the rank of reserve lieutenant to corporal. Korsch boasted that he never carried a rifle or sabre. Somehow he survived the hostility of his own commanding officers, and was twice decorated with the Iron Cross, for acts of bravery under fire.

2) http://www.dkrenton.co.uk/research/korsch.html

The Frankurt School as it has come to be known, is actually The Institute For Social Research and was founded in 1923.

2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Social_Research

Its first head was Kurt Albert Gerlach. A German Marxist. Not a Jew. He died before the centre opened and was replaced by Carl Grunberg

1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_Albert_Gerlach

2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Gr%C3%BCnberg

Carl Grunberg was a German Marxist. He was Jewish.

The idea of the centre and its origins are described here ;

1) http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School

The Institute emerged from a week-long symposium held in Ilmenau, Germany in 1922. The First Marxist Workweek was organized and funded by German-Argentinean agricultural magnate Felix Weil with the purpose of combining the different trends of Marxism. The symposium was attended by Georg Lukács, Karl Korsch, Karl August Wittfogel, and Friedrich Pollock, among others. The event was reportedly so successful that Weil set about erecting a building and funding salaries for a permanent "Institute for Marxism" modeled upon the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow.

In 1923, with the help of the German Communist Party, the Institute for Social Research was opened at Frankfurt University with Carl Grünberg as its first Director.

The initial work at the Institute was oriented towards exploring Marxism as a scientific and economic methodology, but after the death of Grünberg and the temporary directorship of Pollock, Jewish Marxist Max Horkheimer was appointed the to the chair and changed the direction of the Institute from promoting an orthodox Marxist philosophy to what would later be called "cultural Marxism," better known as "political correctness."

Cultural Marxism is also known Critical Theory ;

1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_theory

Critical theory was first defined by Max Horkheimer of the Frankfurt School of sociology in his 1937 essay Traditional and Critical Theory: Critical theory is a social theory oriented toward critiquing and changing society as a whole, in contrast to traditional theory oriented only to understanding or explaining it. Horkheimer wanted to distinguish critical theory as a radical, emancipatory form of Marxian theory, critiquing both the model of science put forward by logical positivism and what he and his colleagues saw as the covert positivism and authoritarianism of orthodox Marxism and Communism

The ideological basis of critical theory comes from five Frankfurt School theoreticians: Herbert Marcuse, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Walter Benjamin, and Erich Fromm. Of these five only Adorno was not Jewish. All were Marxists.

Modern critical theory has been influenced by György Lukács and Antonio Gramsci as well as the second generation Frankfurt School scholars, including Jürgen Habermas.

Lukacs was a Jewish Marxist. Gramsci an Italian Marxist.

The current head of the Frankfurt School is Jurgen Habermas.

Habermas is a German Marxist whose father was a Nazi supporter. He is not Jewish.

1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%BCrgen_Habermas

So we can see from the above explanation of the Frankfurt School the following things ;

1) It was set up as a Marxist body to promote Marxism

2) every one of its founders were German and Marxists.

3) The aims of the organisation have always been to spread the ideas of Marxism into society.

Therefore the contention that the organisation is Jewish and serves Jewish interests is clearly false.

The organsations leadership is not united by one race, one nationality or one religion.

Its leadership is united by only one thing - their support for Marxism.

Which should come as a shock to non-one as it is an organisation set to represent Marxism.

Therefore we need to address two issues peddled by the White Nationalist movement that the Frankfurt School is a Jewish plot to destroy society and for Jews to control the West.

This is clearly false.

For a start the ideology spread by the Frankfurt School, Cultural Marxism, DOES NOT BENEFIT JEWS.

The basis of the contemporary LIBERAL society is LIBERAL. As a result of Liberalism and assimilation pushed by Liberalism derived from Cultural Marxism, the Jewish community is slowly being misceginated out of existence ;

1) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26067980

2) http://www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/IntermarriageWhyNot/

3) http://www.alternet.org/story/142478/israeli_government_ads_warn_against_marrying_non-jews

EVEN BENJAMIN NETANYAHUS SON IS DATING A NON-JEW ;

1) http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2014/01/netanyahu-blasted-for-sons-non-jewish-girlfriend/

It is Liberal Jews and Liberals who most oppose the most nationalistic and racist ideology supported by many Jews today - this being the racist Imperialist state of Israel and its Racist, Nationalistic, imperialistic ideology of Zionism.

Even within Israel vast swathes of the Jewish population, from anti-Zionist Orthodox Jews to Left Wing Liberal Jews oppose both the actions of the Israeli state and Zionism.

The Liberal values that these left wing Jews in Israel support find their origin in Cultural Marxism and the Frankfurt School.

It can even be said that without the ideological influence on Israel and Jews by the Frankfurt School and its Critical Theory / Cultural Marxism, that the Zionist Likudist Far Right in Israel and America would have no political or social opposition groups to oppose them and their activities at all.

The Liberal movement deriving from Cultural Marxism has been the primary fetter on the Eretz Israel Imperialist and Militarist expansionist policies of the Zionist Nationalist right.

If liberal Jews like Gilad Atzmon, Noam Chomsky and many others did not oppose Zionism both in Israel and America then Zionism would would have undoubtedly achieved most of its ideological aims in Israel, America and in relation to its expansionist foreign policy.

Now we need to look at why so many Jews in the 1920's and 1930's supported Marxism.

Thats a pretty easy issue to explain.

As a result of social, political and legal anti-Jewish and anti-semitic laws and violence many Jews across Europe saw Marxism as a mechanism to liberate themselves.

This is why Jews both in Germany & Russia embraced Marxism.

This iw why many Jews in Russia decided to embrace the Marxist Revolution that had swept Russia in 1917 and become either Bolsheviks or Mensheviks.

Many Jews in Russia had embraced the Bolshevik Party early on and had formed a significant proportion of its membership ;

1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolsheviks

The average party member was very young. In 1907, 22% of Bolsheviks were under 20, 37% were 20-24 and 16% were 25-29. By 1905, 62% of the members were industrial workers (3% of the population in 1897

22% of Bolsheviks were gentry (1.7% of the total population), 38% were uprooted peasants, compared with 19% and 26% for the Mensheviks. In 1907 78.3% of the Bolsheviks were Russian and 10% were Jewish (34% and 20% for the Mensheviks).

Total membership was 8,400 in 1905, 13,000 in 1906 and 46,100 by 1907 (8,400, 18,000, 38,200 respectively for the Mensheviks). By 1910 both factions together had fewer than 10,000 members.

But many Jews had also embraced the Menshevik Party as well.

An important issue to note re the Russian Revolution is that the Mensheviks had a far higher proportion of Jewish membership than the Bolsheviks - 20 % of the Mensheviks as opposed to the Bolsheviks 10 %

1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensheviks

The primary opponents of the Bolsheviks WITHIN RUSSIA were the Mensheviks.

Menshevism was finally made illegal after the Kronstadt Uprising of 1921.

Therefore the idea that Jews ran the Bolsheviks and formed the majority of its membership is false.

What is also false is that the Jews all supported the Bolsheviks.

The primary party supported by Jews was the Mensheviks.

The Mensheviks fought against the Bolsheviks in the Kronstadt Rebellion of 1921 and were banned as a a result ;

The Kronstadt rebellion (Russian: Кронштадтское восстание, tr. Kronshtadtskoye vosstaniye) was a major unsuccessful uprising against the Bolsheviks in the later years of the Russian Civil War. Led by Stepan Petrichenko and consisting of Russian sailors, soldiers and civilians, the rebellion was one of the reasons for Vladimir Lenin's and the Communist Party's decision to loosen its control of the Russian economy by implementing the New Economic Policy (NEP).

1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kronstadt_Uprising

The Mensheviks were led by a Jew ;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepan_Petrichenko

So the leader of a major uprising against Lenin and the Bolsheviks was a Jewish Menshevik leading a Menshevik movement with a far higher number of Jews in it than the Bolsheviks.

So the idea that Bolshevism was Jewish & supported by Jews is demonstrably false.

Note that the Bolshevik Party with the smallest percentage of Jews in it, lost and the Bolsheviks won.

So therefore the assertion that ;

1) As the Frankfurt Schools had a high number of Jews in it that they served Jewish interests as opposed to Marxist interests is false.

Jews in the early 20th century did not form a monolithic, cohesive bloc.

They were divided into Orthodox Jews, Nationalistic Zionist Jews and Communust Bolshevik, Menshevik and Liberal Marxist Jews. There were also atheist Jews, anarchist Jews and even fascist Jews such as the ones who supported Mussolini ;

1) http://redroom.com/member/frank-sanello/writing/mussolini%E2%80%99s-jews-the-chosen-people-fascist-italy-rejected

2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margherita_Sarfatti

Even Hitler had over 150,000 Jews fighting for Germany in WW2 ;

1) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/museums/10682975/The-Jews-who-fought-for-Hitler-We-did-not-help-the-Germans.-We-had-a-common-enemy.html

2) http://www.kansaspress.ku.edu/righit.html

3) http://www.rense.com/general43/jewserved.htm

The soldier whose image of the ideal German Soldier used in Nazi magazines was also Jewish ;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werner_Goldberg

Even the Number 2 in the leadership of Himmlers SS was Jewish ;

1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emil_Maurice

Even the British Union Of Fascists led Sir Oswald Mosley had Jewish members and candidates in elections.

So we can see that as far more Jews served in the German military for Hitler, then using the same logic of those who call the Frankfurt Schools 'Jewish' simply by counting Jews involved in the organisation, then using that exact same 'logic' that the Nazis and the Nazi movement were also Jewish and controlled by Jews.

The idiocy of 'counting Jews' as the basis of an proposition that an organisation serve Jewish interests, is about an asinine methodology one can imagine.

Jews are not The Borg from Star Trek. They do not share a Hive Mind nor do they all have a sense of ethno-communal loyalty only to their fellow Jews.

In fact such ethno-communalism that does exist, can be exploited by criminals within the Jewish community.

For an example of how some Jewish crooks can exploit Jewish ethno-communalism for their own advantage we need only to look at such criminals as ;

1) http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/24/world/americas/24iht-24jews.18903457.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

2) http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2008/12/charities_old_people_jews_hit.html

If the Frankfurt School was Jewish, then so too must have been the Fascists in Italy as many Jews in Italy supported, funded and were members of the Fascist movement.

THE PRIMARY POINT IS THIS - the Cultural Marxist movement that spawned Liberalism has not benefited the Jews in any way.

It has led to the formation of the Jewish Left who oppose Zionist Nationalism.

It has created the social dynamic towards Jewish assimilation that is misceginating much of the Jewish Community itself.

It has created the myriad liberal social dysfunction such as the epidemic of drug abuse that kills many Jewish young people in the entertainment industry in particular eg Amy Winehouse.

Cultural Marxism is as much a threat to Jewish social, political and ethnic communalism and genetic survival as it is to all those peoples exposed to it.

All the above information is based on facts.

If you think you can refute it then try.

If you are right, I will publish it.

Camerons Conservatives A Murdoch Media Puppet

Camerons Conservatives a Murdoch Media Puppet

As we all know it is not the British people who control our so called 'democracy', it is in fact the Media.

The media propagandise the political parties they want elected in their papers and then the mass of the public then vote for them. The role of the media in modern societies is to ensure that a Peoples Democracy NEVER arises, and to ensure that what controls our country is in fact the plutocrats and the corporations that own the papers and the politicians.

This is why we live in what I define as a Global Corporate Facist society - a society that like classic fascism is controlled by both corporations and government but that, unlike Classic Fascism, actually runs the country for the benefit of the corporations and the parasitic political class as opposed as running it for the benefit of the people.

This is the Blairite Third Way - a sick dog of a democracy where Fabians and globalists have created the worst of all possible worlds , a place where Political Correctness controls the Public Sphere and where Consumerism controls the Private Sphere.

The brainwashed puppets of the masses gutlessly surrender their liberties and rights to the dictats of Political Correctness and then surrender their individuality to the transient fashions and fads of Consumerism.

Tony Blair before the 1997 election flew to Australia to insert his tongue into the buttocks of Rupert Murdoch and then once elected into power with Murdochs help rewarded Murdoch with a whole raft of new laws that allowed him to buy media companies in the UK. Richard Desmond, owner of the Daily Express and pornographer in chief of the UK who is a particularly vile little peddler of filth, was allowed to buy the newspaper after promising to support Labour and attack the BNP.

Now it appears that Camerons Conservatives, that cabal of limp wristed public school popinjays and aristocratic mummys boys, are under the direct control of the media in the form of Andy Coulson, the ex-Editor of The News of The World, that well known newspaper for such serious journalism as devoting the majority of its pages to the sex lives of celebrities that no-one with an IQ above that of the ambient temperature within a closed fridge would be interested in.

There is nothing sadder than watching the cabal of public school bedwetters that comprise the senior ranks of the Tory Party adopting a tough populist stance.

Such poseurs are innately pathetic , for example Damon Albarn of Blur, the worlds most pathetic mockney who now calls himself a communist whilst living in his mansion on the proceeds of his royalities.

Albarn is one of the leading royals of the New Royalty of the 21st Century, formed from left wing rock stars like 'Two Castles and a Private Jet ' Bono, TV hosts like Jonathan ' my dog kennel costs more than your house ' Ross, comedians ( ! ) like Ben Elton - all of whom live lives of publically subsidised leisure, consumerism, conspicuous consumption and waste and who have now replaced the previous Royals as the parasitic class of consumerism as opposed to the parasitic class of Imperialism ( according to their own hypocritical analysis and standards ).

Just like the Bolshevik leaders took over and lived in the palaces of the tsar after the Russian Revolution, the communist rock and pop stars that once attacked the Royal Family and the aristocracy as degenerate priveliged spongers now live in the mansions and drive the Rolls Royces that were once owned by the aristocrats they despised - oh where is the Irony Gene in our society when it is required to deflate these idiots. Where once the Royals quaffed champagne and drove their Rolls Roycaes and went hunting, the New Royals inject smack, smoke crack, drive their Rolls Royces, fly their private jets and go on demonstrations against hunting. The New Royals have become the Old Royals.

King Billy Bragg , the clotted cream and jam scone revolutionary who lives in Devon off of his royalties whilst advocating urban ressurection in Essex and the inner cities of Britain, is the crowned prince of hypocrisy. Revolutionaries do not live in Devon - FACT.

Others in that class of overpaid and pampered morons in the New Royalty are people like Pete Doherty , or the Cat Torturer, as he is now known who is not content with just being a junkie twat but has now opened up a new career in creating a generation of crack addicted cats so he and his mates when drug upped can laugh at them whilst they are being tortured. Lets hope that the crack addicted kitten he tortured is sold a gun by a rival crack dealing gang of feral alley cats and doherty ends up being a statistic of Kitten Gang Gun Crime - what a dilemma that would be for the RSPCA.

And these are the role models celebrated in The Wankers Bible ( THE N.M.E) who are lauded for being role models for youth. This is a magazine that attacks the BNP as 'racists' yet at the same time fetes and celebrates junkie rock stars like Doherty who buy their crack cocaine and heroin from black dealers and turkish drug importers who terrorise and murder their own communities and who also are the cause of the gang wars that are devastating the black community and awho are also funding Islamic terrorism in the UK. The junkies syringe filled with smack pumps profits back into the coffers of the Taliban that are used to buy guns to kill British troops in Afghanistan or that funds Pakistani and Turkish crime gangs and Islamist terrorists in the UK, whilst cocaine funds Communist para-militaries and gangs in Colombia that murder thousands of ordinary people and devastate the rainforests and the Amazon where they plant and process the coca plants into cocaine.

The N.ME and its staff of drug addlled, coke sniffing bisexuals are the real racists as they celebrate the drug culture and white junkies in the music industry that fund the crime gangs and death dealers in the communities of indigenous peoples of the Amazon, Colombia, Turkey, Pakistan and Afghanistan.

For information on Mr. Coulson, one of the Media Vultures that feed on death, degeneracy and crime here ; http://politics.guardian.co.uk/conservatives/story/0,,2164680,00.html

For proof of how far the rot has gone this a report from the Guardian newspaper, that well know employer of communist spies during the Cold War and Islamist Jihadis and appeasers of terrorism during the present war against Terror ;

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/media/story/0,,2164931,00.html

Coulson: the tabloid man taking Cameron to the right·

Passage put into speech about broken society·

Tory leader 'sticking to modernisation strategy' Patrick Wintour,
political editorSaturday September 8, 2007

In the week Rhys Jones was shot, David Cameron had been ambivalent about being seen to be jumping on a bandwagon, and was due to press ahead with a speech on a new compact for the military to be delivered at Brize Norton.

At the last minute, under pressure from his director of communications, Andrew Coulson, it was agreed to insert a passage into his speech to RAF personnel on how the boy's death in a pub car park reflected the broken society of which the Conservatives had spoken.

It was followed by a series of time-consuming radio interviews driven by Coulson. The change of tack shows how Coulson, the former News of the World editor, is determined to push Cameron on to the news, and is less wary than other advisers of being seen to pursue a right-wing agenda. Within days Mr Cameron was speaking of anarchy in the UK, a phrase earlier used by the Sun.
Mr Cameron yesterday insisted he will not abandon his modernisation strategy, using a speech at his new party headquarters to assert it was perfectly consistent for a compassionate Tory to talk not only about crime and Europe, but also the environment and the future of the NHS.

It was prompted by a growing feeling in Tory circles that the arrival of Coulson as communications chief in June has led to a rightward drift in Mr Cameron's emphasis, both to shore up his dwindling support at the base of the party, but also to stem the alarming flow of votes to Gordon Brown.

Mr Coulson, the script runs, increased his influence by organising a rightward tinged fightback for Mr Cameron, and did this while Mr Cameron's modernising guru and close ally Steve Hilton spent a few weeks in Sardinia.

Ever since he returned from his own holiday there has indeed been a new toughness to Mr Cameron as he battled to prevent the polls going into meltdown. The party leader has been unafraid to speak out on crime and immigration, two touchstone issues for Tory rightwingers.

They have been visibly cheered and believe they can see Coulson's influence. Nick Wood, the former communications director for William Hague, sees Coulson in the ascendancy.

He wrote this week: "If Coulson has told Cameron one thing, I suggest it is this: without the enthusiastic backing of the Mail, Telegraph and Express and a fair wind from the Sun and the Times, the election is lost - and lost badly. To coin a phrase: there is no alternative."

Nick Wood is, to be frank, speaking utter bollocks.

There is an alternative to the Media Fascist State we live in - its called the BNP and when we get in power we will sweep away all the structures of the Global Corporate Fascist System and all its vile little crawling parasitic lackeys.