The Right Spectrum

The continual call of The Right Sector as Far Right / Fascist / Uktra-Nationalist / Nazi / Nationalist etc prove that the media do not have a clue as to what either The Right Sector stand for politically or where they sit on the Nationalist spectrum.

I define below where most Right parties and movements sit.

The Right Spectrum is based on two forces Revolution and Reaction. One the Far Left we see the Socialist & Nationalist anti-corporate and anti-Imperialist impulse and the Far Right is designated by an Imperialist and Corporate impulse.

This allows us to place nationalist political parties and movements on a Left to Right scale based on Left Nationalist Revolutionary ideology to Reactionary Right ideology.

We shall start on the Left of the Right Spectrum.

A) Social Nationalist - eg Strasserite Left Revolutionary Social Nationalists. Anti-corporate, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist and nationalist.

B) National Socialism - the original ideology of the NSDAP in Germany prior to the expulsion of the National Socialist left by Hitler. Had its origins in a fusion of the Left & Right.

C) Conservatism - we can place this at the centre point of the spectrum. Do not confuse Conservatism with the Conservative Party in Britain, as the latter is now a social democratic party. Some conservatives seek to preserve things as they are, emphasizing stability and continuity, while others, called reactionaries, oppose modernism and seek a return to "the way things were ". The Conservatives who want things to remain stable are on the left of the Conservative wing, usually called 'the wets' or Red Tories and those who are the Dries, whose policies which came to be labelled as "dry" ones included foremostly reducing public spending, cutting taxes, lowering interest rates, tightly controlling the money supply, and reducing the regulatory power of the state – all policies which were closely associated with Thatcher.

D) Paleo-Conservatism - emphasis on tradition, limited government, civil society, anti-colonialism and anti-federalism, along with religious, regional, national and Western identity.

E) Nationalism - traditional nationalism relates to a protection of the people and the nation. Though the nation and people are seen as a unity, this is not based solely on an ethnic definition of the citizens of that nation. Those who are loyal to the nation are seen as one with the nation. Unlike Cultural Nationalism, which says only those who are culturally integrated into the nation and its culture can be members of the nation, nationalism allows other cultures to exist within the nation state as long as their loyalty is to the nation and the people of the nation itself - and not some other nation or their own ethnic interests.

F) Cultural Nationalism - as this does not explicitly relate to ethnic interests, it sits between Paleo-Conservatism & Ethnic Nationalism on the spectrum. Though the fact that it demands cultural integration and excludes those who may be loyal to the nation even though they are not culturally integrated means it sits on the right of the spectrum to Nationalism.

G) Ethnic Nationalism - as its focus relates to the protection and promotion of ethnic and cultural interests, it sits on the Right of the spectrum.

H) Fascism - Fascism was the merger of the State & the corporations. Hence its union with the corporations ensured the pre-dominance of corporate interests took precedence over the socialist impulse within Fascism. Hence it has to be placed in the Reactionary Right section of the spectrum. Fascism can also be imperialist.

I) Neo-Conservatism - this is included on the Far Right spectrum due to its imperialist, militarist, supra-national scope as way to promote US corporate interests. The fact that the movement has as much loyalty to Israel as America, means that it cannot be included within the definition of a Nationalist movement.

J) Hitlerism - Hitlerism is not National Socialism. It is fact the antithesis of National Socialism as it is the use of the State to profit the Capitalists and Industrialists via the use of war as a mechanism to increase corporate profits. Hitlerism was Supra-national in scope eg Greater German Reich & The New Order based on supra-national imperialist Pan-Aryanism.

So we can see that the placing of The Right Sector as a Fascist / Nazi / Hitlerite group is false.

They fit squarely into the Nationalist bracket.

Hamas and Anti-Nationalism

There are few people more stupid than some of the idiot so called 'white nationalists' that support Hamas and despise Israel.

The excellent article below explains why Hamas are in fact an Islamist imperialist force that are anti-Nationalist.

Therefore any so called White Nationalist that supports Hamas, simply because Hamas like them are anti-Israel and anti-semitic, are a pathetic joke.



http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article5477420.ece

January 9, 2009

No way forward while the Hamas hydra lives
For Islamists in Gaza, Palestine is part of a global religious struggle not a battle to create an independent stateAmir Taheri
The conflict in Gaza has been triggered by Israel's belief that the status quo has become intolerable and should be overturned.

There are several reasons why Israel felt it could not live with the situation in Gaza. The most immediate is the rocket attacks by Hamas that have made life for nearly a tenth of Israelis an exercise in anxiety. Also a factor is that Hamas, since it staged its putsch two years ago, has closed Gaza to all Palestinian groups that have accepted a two-state solution. This makes it impossible for Israel and the administration of President Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) in the West Bank to restart negotiations that could lead to the creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel.

More importantly, perhaps, Hamas has forged an alliance with Iran based on President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's strategy of “wiping Israel off the map”. Tehran's investment in Hamas is large enough to have given it a decisive say in shaping the group's strategy. Israelis see Hamas as one of the two arms of a pincer, along with Iranian-funded Hezbollah in Lebanon, that Tehran is building against them.

Thus, Israel's war aims are clear: end the rocket attacks, reopen Gaza to other Palestinian parties and eliminate the Iranian presence. This means creating a new status quo in which Hamas is not the dominant party in Gaza.


Some commentators have claimed that the cause of the current war is Israel's occupation. But Gaza - until last weekend - was the one bit of Arab territory nominally under Israeli occupation that was free of Israeli settlers and troops. Yet, most of Israel's troubles, in the form of rocket attacks and suicide operations, came from Gaza. At the other end of the spectrum, the Golan Heights, under Israeli occupation since 1967, have been as quiet as a churchyard despite the presence of large numbers of Israeli settlers and troops.

Hamas, as its charter and political literature make clear, does not want an end to Israeli occupation. It wants the end of Israel. That is because Hamas is part of a pan-Islamist movement with global messianic ambitions. Creating a Palestinian state in Gaza and the West Bank is not its aim. A branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas dreams of world dominion for its version of Islam rather than a mini-state in 5,000 square kilometres of barren land in a geopolitical backyard.

Although officially created in 1987, Hamas's roots go back to the 1930s when Haj Amin al-Hussaini, the Grand Mufti of Palestine under the British Mandate, allied himself with Hitler and dreamt of reviving the Islamic Caliphate with himself as Caliph.

That Hamas cares little about Palestine as a would-be nation state is clear from its name and charter. Hamas is the Arab acronym for “Islamic Resistance Movement”, making it clear that the movement regards Palestine not as a nation in its own right but as a small part of the ummah, the community of believers. Hamas is the only significant party in Palestine whose name does not include the words Palestine or Palestinian.

To Hamas ideologues, such as the late Sheikh Ahmad Yassin, love of Palestine as a nation is a form of sherk, that is to say false worship or idolatry. Hamas sees Palestinian nationalists such as Abu Mazen as traitors to Islam.

To Hamas, Palestine is part of a cause rather than a political project. One cannot negotiate with a cause that claims celestial benediction, especially when it rejects the very legitimacy of one's existence. A political project, however, is negotiable because it is about worldly problems such as territory, borders, security, exchange of populations and joint administration of certain areas, which could have worldly solutions.

For decades, Palestinians suffered because their leaders - starting with the Mufti and ending with Yassir Arafat - linked the problem of Palestine with big power rivalries in which Palestine was a slogan and a pretext. It was only in the 1990s that the Palestinian leadership, led by Fatah, managed to redefine Palestine as a territorial conflict between two neighbouring nations, rather than as part of a clash of civilisations. That redefinition led to the Oslo Accords and the creation of a Palestinian administration - the first step towards statehood.

Hamas, however, rejects that redefinition and is trying to recast Palestine as a religious issue in Islam's global struggle against the “infidel”. Many Palestinians see this as a betrayal of their national aspirations. They do not wish to be the sacrificial lamb of pan-Islamist global ambitions as they were for pan-Arabism in the 1960s.

Cutting Hamas down to size would be good not only for Israel but also for the Palestinian people, more specifically the people of Gaza, who have become captives of a one-party state mired in corruption and incompetence.

That, however, is no easy task. Hamas is a many-headed beast. One head represents the part of Hamas that deals with welfare, health and education. It imposed its domination in that field by driving out more than 200 NGOs, seizing control of the running of independent clinics and schools and infiltrating its people into the running of international aid agencies.

A second head is represented by Hamas's political network that managed to win 46 per cent of the votes in the only free elections held in the territories. Although the Hamas political machine remains strong, it is not at all certain that it could deliver that many votes in the next elections.

A third head of Hamas consists of its network of business concerns. Through a mixture of patronage, judicious investments and intimidation it has gained control of the Gazan economy - everything from barber shops to textile workshops. It also runs a protection racket and a contraband network. As a business concern, Hamas raised its profile when it seized control of more than 600 companies controlled by Fatah and the Arafat clan.

Finally, there is Hamas's terror machine, a paramilitary force of about 20,000 men and women, answerable only to their own command structures. It is that part of Hamas that Tehran is trying to buy and control through figures such as Khaled Mishal, head of the Hamas political bureau.

Later this year Palestinians are due to vote for a new parliament and president. Divided into a Hamasstan in Gaza and Fatah-land in the West Bank, they would have little chance of creating a unified government capable of pressing for a Palestinian state. A change of status quo in Gaza could give them a chance.

Amir Taheri's latest book is The Persian Night: Iran Under the Khomeinist Revolution, published this month by Encounter Books

The Real Situation In Gaza and Israel

The reason for the Israeli incursion into Gaza has nothing to do with the bombardment of cheap and nasty rockets fired by Hamas terrorists into Israel. The rockets are being fired by Hamas solely for symbolic and propaganda reasons so as to show the Palestinian people of Gaza that they are 'resisting the Israelis' thereby allowing them to pretend that they are involved in a proper 'palestinian nationalist struggle' as opposed to their real Islamist struggle, and Israel are using the 'threat' of the rockets solely for propaganda reasons to cover their real motive for war. There has been one Israeli killed by the Hamas rockets in the last year. Their presence is not a 'threat' though it does means some Israeli people in towns where the rockets reach have to spend a lot of time indoors - but then again so do old white people in 'enriched' parts of London.

This incursion is not about Hamas's rubbish rockets, it is about Iran.

Hamas has to be smashed in Gaza before Iran can build its nukes and this changes the regional balance of power forever. Once Iran has the bomb then Arab demographics and Assymetric Warfare will destroy Israel - unless Israel can destroy Iranian influence on its borders and in the region whilst it still has the military advantage on the ground.

This sort of 'disinfecting' process whereby Israel is required to sterilise areas of radical Islamist support, such as what Lebanon did last year with the attacks on radical Islamists in its Palestinian refugee camps, is what all nations have to do in order to eradicate Islamist cells who have managed to take over territory either within or on the edges of their borders.

What we saw in the Lebanon with the Lebanese government sending in its troops to eradicate Islamists from their territory, and what Israel is doing now in Gaza, is the same military process that every single nation on earth has to take in order to reclaim its territory back from Islamist insurgents or radical terrorist movements and militias.

It is the war of the future. Get used to the casualties - for without them any nation so infected with Islamism will surrender, rot away into liberal apathy and then dies as it is taken over.

The US has refused to allow Israel to go and attack Iran with military force.

Therefore if Israel cannot contain Iranian military influence in the region by smashing its nuclear weapons programme then it will extirpate its terrorist proxy armies on its borders - therefore it has to smash Hamas in Gaza and Hizbollah In Lebanon.

For those that think what Israel is doing is excessive - that is ridiculous in relation to what Israel militarily can do. Excessive would be the eradication of Gaza with a nuclear weapon. What Israel is doing is what nations do when they secure their national security.

Nationalists must fight for the survival of their nations.

Hamas have probably killed as many of their own Palestinian people as Israel have.

Since they launched their coup against the PLO and the government of the Palestinian Authority hundreds of Palestinians opposed to Hamas have been executed by Hamas since they took power - including Palestinian Nationalists, democracts, libertarians and socialists. Hamas is a totalitarian organisation that is the process of Islamising the Palestinian people and nation - they are a terrorist militia dedicated to the global Jihad funded and controlled by Iran.

As a nationalist I can only support the PLO as the only legitimate government of the Palestinian people. Hamas are an Islamist movement opposed to Nationalism as an ideology and who support a pan-nationalist, pan-racial Islamist movement that is dedicated to the Global Jihad and the eradication of all nation states.

Those Nationalists that see Hamas as a the potential allies of British Nationalism simply because Hamas is an enemy of Israel are idiots. Hamas is ANTI-NATIONALIST and therefore a threat to all nations and nationalists - just as Communism was a threat to all nations eg The Soviet Union, global capitalism is a threat to nations and national economies and the European Union is a threat to nationalism due to its plans for integration of European nations.

As a nationalist I cannot support Anti-Nationalist forces.

A British Nationalist position is against Islamism, domination of our nation by Zionist interests and dependence on Saudi Oil Money. Those that are unable to differentiate between those Zionists in the UK and the nation of Israel are missing the point.

The issue for British Nationalists as regards Israel is irrelevant. Any so called 'British Nationalist' that directly or indirectly promotes the interests of Islamism in its Global Jihad by advocating supporting Hamas, just because Hamas is anti-Israel, is a traitor to the principle of Nationalism itself.

What Israel does - and what Hamas does - is nothing to do with us.

As NATIONALISTS we say that what any nation does, either Palestinian or Israeli, to secure its national security is down to them. That is the primary principle of nationalism itself.

The issue for the United Kingdom is simply the control and domination of our national economic, media and cultural systems by forces influenced or controlled by the Zionist network in the UK and the indigenous Liberal Elite. The Zionist network represent the interests solely of Israel, they do not represent the interests of the Jewish community in Britain. In fact the Zionist network - represented by groups such as the CST, Searchlight, the Labour Friends of Israel, Tory Friends of Israel etc etc have for decades held ideological positions positively detrimental to the British Jewish community eg on mass immigration, multi-culturalism, the appeasement of Islamism etc etc

There are no mutual interests between British Nationalism and Islamism. Israel is an issue for the Arabs, not the British people.

There are though mutual interests between the British Jewish community and British Nationalism - in that both British Jews and British Nationalists recognise the appalling danger that successive Labour and Tory governments have placed Britain in by allowing millions of Islamic immigrants into the UK, by allowing Sharia Law to be introduced into our legal system, by allowing areas of our nation to become Islamic Colonies where separate development under the guise of Multi-Culturalism has created bases for Islamist thought and radicalisation of the growing Muslim demographic.

Both British Nationalists and British Jews have an interest in overthrowing both the Zionist Network, the UK version of AIPAC and its many links, as well the indigenous British idiots of both the Left and Right, the Liberal Elite, who are shackled to both the Liberal Consensus and Political Correctness - which are the two ideological absurdities that are the basis of the stagnation, apathy, passivity and stupidity of the mainstream parties.

It is the agents of the Zionist network, the proxy organisations of the Israeli state that operate in the UK, and the agents of the Liberal Elite, the inner enemies of the indigenous British people who work in political parties both left and right and who control politics, education, the media and culture via their wealth and influence, for the benefit of the Liberal Conensus - that are our mutual enemies.

It is these two social forces - the Zionist Network and the Liberal Elite that are the enemies of British Nationalism.

Israel is an irrelevance to nationalists. The US has exerted tremendous influence on the UK since World War 2, the EU has excercised enormous power in the UK and so have the UN and the WTO - there are many areas of our national life that demand the removal of influence deriving from external supra-national governmental and corporate forces - that does not mean we must treat them all as enemies once we are in power.

Once in power our focus must be solely on enacting internal regime change and consolidating our nationalist revolution, not posturing like a paper tiger and snarling at a hundred foreign enemies because we as a nation and a people were once weak and stupid enough to allow ourselves to be conquered from within.

The enemy has never been anyone other than ourselves, for it is our own people who enslaved us and sold us out.

It was our own people who bent their knee for foreigners gold, who opened the gates of our nation to the foreign hordes, who passed laws allowing the colonisation of our nation, who passed laws that imposed positive discrimination and affirmative action, who passed the vote to send our troops to Iraq and Afghanistan, who signed the contracts that sold our national industries to Middle East Oil, who gave out land to the US to build their air bases on, who obeyed the commands of the Zionists in Israel and who voted yes for the EU.

It was our own idiotic people who are primarily to blame for our plight - not the phantom of Israel that has been raised to a mythical behemoth in the minds of the deranged psychotics that haunt the more disturbed areas of the internet.

The role of Nationalist politics is simply to remove all those agents and forces in our society under the control of external and internal forces who have the power to control and influence the political, economic, cultural and media systems that control our nation and who have done so in such a way that the interests of the British nation and people were damaged in the past - once we have done that, and dealt with those who were responsible for such treasonous activities, then our job is done. Our aim is to restore power to the British people - not to interfere in the internal affairs of other nations simply because at some point traitors in our nation allowed themselves to be corrupted by those that ran those nations at that point in time.

Once we regain control of our nation, then we enact the national revolution that ensures we as a nation are never again enslaved to the interests of other nations nor betrayed by those that were meant to serve the nation and the people but instead served wealth and power.

The mainstream parties cannot abandon their support for the lies and absurdities that form the foundations of the Liberal Consensus and Political Correctness as to do so means they will be accused of being 'racists' by the Liberal and Zionist Elite that control the present political and media systems.

Therefore the only way the British people and the British Jewish community can survive the imminent collapse of the Multi-cultural society is by abandoning both the indigenous Liberal Elite and the Zionist Network at the same time.

Those that say we should support Hamas are not nationalists.

Those that say we should support Israel are also not nationalists.

Our role as Nationalists is to ensure we do not get entangled in their wars.

We must though support the fundamental right of ALL nations to deal with their internal and external national security as they see fit - those moron nationalists that are screaming for the Israelis to be ordered by the UN, the US or the EU to stop the incursion into Gaza are in fact arguing for the anti-nationalist forces of the planet to have the power to interfere in the internal affairs of a sovereign nation state - and even to act to stop the actions of that sovereign state when it securing its own national security interests.

WHAT SORT OF BLOODY IDIOT NATIONALIST CALLS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY TO HAVE THE POWER TO ORDER NATIONS WHAT TO DO IN THEIR OWN BORDERS !

What Israel does today, is what many nations will need to do in the future when faced with the same situation - such as Russia in Chechnya and Serbia with the KLA have understood.

ONLY NATIONALIST MORONS CALL FOR ISRAEL TO BE PUNISHED FOR EXCERCISING ITS OWN NATIONAL POWER TO SECURE IT OWN NATIONAL SECURITY INTERESTS IN ITS OWN COUNTRY !

ONCE THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HAS THE POWER TO ORDER NATIONS TO STOP, OR INVADE THEM WHEN THEY DONT, THEN THEY WILL NEVER SURRENDER THAT POWER.

THAT IS THE DEATH OF ALL NATIONS.

The only Occupied Territories that should concern us as British Nationalists are the ones in the UK, the towns and cities that have become colonies for mass immigration and centres of Islamist radicalisation.

The Front Line of the Global Jihad is not in Israel - the front line for the UK is at Dover not in Gaza.

Our role is to ensure British troops are returned so that they can be used to fight the War On Terrorists in Britain, and at the same time secure our borders and to assist the police with the removal of millions of illegal immigrants, criminals and Islamist and Zionist extremists from the UK.