Peter Hitchins - ultimate hypocrite

Image - Peter Hitchens with the Zambian version of Nick Griffin, Michael Sata. It appears that it is acceptable for black African people to have a Zambian Nationalist party to protect them from mass immigration but it is racist for White European British people to have a British Nationalist party that protects them from mass immigration.



Peter Hitchens is a total hypocrite.

In The Daily Mail he launches regular foam flecked attacks on the BNP, but when he goes to Africa and meets black politicians who state EXACTLY what the BNP say about mass immigration into the UK, he hugs them and gives them his puppydog look.

Hitchens it appears is just another self loathing liberal posturing in the robes of a paleo-conservative reactionary.

Read what he says here. Note his support for Mr. Sata, who indeed seems an honorable and brave man defying a repressive Zambian government that uses its corrupt police force to silence dissent and debate ;


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1063198/PETER-HITCHENS-How-China-created-new-slave-empire-Africa.html


All this has aroused the suspicions of Mr Sata, a populist politician famous for his blunt, combative manner and his harsh, biting attacks on opponents, and who was once a porter who swept the platforms at Victoria Station in London.

Now the leader of the Patriotic Front, with a respectable chance of winning a presidential election set for the end of October, Sata says:

'The Chinese are not here as investors, they are here as invaders.

'They bring Chinese to come and push wheelbarrows, they bring Chinese bricklayers, they bring Chinese carpenters, Chinese plumbers. We have plenty of those in Zambia.'

'We don't need to import labourers from China,' Sata says. 'We need to import people with skills we don't have in Zambia. The Chinese are not going to train our people in how to push wheelbarrows.'

In language which seems exaggerated, but which will later turn out to be at least partly true, he claims: 'They employ people in slave conditions.'

A Message For Peter Hitchins

Image - Trotsky and Lenin.




I would have posted this response to your lastest your Daily Mail blog article peter but I note you now have blocked my e mail from leaving comments on the site, though usually you never allow them to be posted online anyway so no real loss.

Today the penny finally dropped about you peter.

You are still a Marxist, though one that today masquerades as a Reactionary.

Peter was a Trotskyist who was a member of the International Socialists from 1969 to 1975, and joined the British Labour Party in 1977, campaigning for Ken Livingstone's parliamentary candidature for Hampstead in the 1979 general election.

Hitchens left the Labour Party in 1983 when he became a political reporter at the Daily Express and thought it "no longer appropriate to carry a party card".

Peter wasnt just one your usual 'reds' though, one of those pathetic simpering 'ruprechts and ruperts' drooling, mewling idiots we see holding a Hope Not Hate poster on our streets shouting ' Waaaaccciiisst' but a Revolutionary Red, a member of the Revolutionary Red intelligensia.

For 6 years he was a Revolutionary Red, and one of the top turds perched upon the pile of hundreds of thousands of little turds.

Then then he became a political red, moving into the Establishment from university.

Then he became a media red - and then all of a sudden he became a Paleo-Conservative Reactionary writing in the Daily Mail.

Bullshit.

This was a phased process, a transition from one revolutionary form to another.

The Revolutionary Red who once waved the red flag, was now waving a blue flag for the conservatives - but he was still a red where it counted, on the inside and still committed to the downfall of British society and our way of life.

This creep is the most successful revolutionary red in British history.

He is the Kim Philby of Fleet Street, one of the last great red vipers from the Cold War still nestling in the bosom of the establishment.

He is a serpent that whispers poison into the ears of our society, and his lisps are the whispers of treason inside our city gate.

He whispers of sterility, senility, servitude and apathy.

The idea that an ideologically committed Revolutionary Red like Hitchens could become an ideologically Paleo-Conservative Reactionary is so rare that I cannot see it happening.

The phased process of Peter Hitchens conversion also suggests a Red moving into the mainstream of the Establishment and then working within the Establishment using classic Gramscian methodology - eg being someone who is using the right wing media to ensure the entire right wing of British politics, from paleo-conservatism to nationalism, are unable to organise.

Therefore I suggest that he and his brother as Gramscists made a conscious decision to use the media from inside the media against the social and cultural values that bound our nation together.

Christopher attacks the centre from the left, Peter from the right.

Each eats away at the centre whilst also ensuring the political forces, social forces and cultural forces of Nationalism and Classic Liberalism, which were once at the core of our society, are unable to organise within society.

Peter Hitchens ensures that the ideas, values and ideology of Nationalism are attacked in the media and that paelo-conserative reaction is promoted to the masses. He seeks to perpetuate the same conservative social forces, institutions, ideas, values and ideology that have led to the current crisis.

This allows the Corporatocracy to remain in power either with a Leftist multi-culturalism perspective or a Paleo-Conservative Globalist perspective.

Hitchens supports the Church, traditional conservative values and liberal conservative values.

Yet these are the very institutions that have been hijacked by the Left and infected with political correctness.

Empowering politically the Church of England in todays society is like empowering the Communist Party - the old Nationalist Church of England for the English people that represented the interests of England and the English is now regarded as 'racist' by a majority of those frock wearing freaks and reds that infest its palaces and cathedrals.

Therefore supporting those institutions or empowering those institutions merely empowers the enemies of Nationalism.

Peter Hitchens says 'DO NOT VOTE, TORY, BNP OR UKIP' and therefore at a stroke the entire right wing of British politics is immediately disengaged from participating in the political process, thereby allowing the left and liberals to organise and impose the Servile State upon us.

He supports the most reactionary, regressive forces in British society being re-empowered, feeble institutions such as the Church of England now in the grip of liberal senility, in order to ensure NATIONALIST forces are unable to arise and organise, both within and outside those institutions.

He supports a paleo-conservative party of the right, which nowhere exists other than in his own mind, whose political manifesto, programme and agenda is simply to perpetuate the failed values of the Tory reactionary right that caused the crisis in society the first place. The fact that no such party of the paleo-conservative right exists or will ever exist means he spend the entire time attacking and undermining the political groups that do organise to represent the right in elections.

Therefore even if Hitchens dream party did arise and flourish - its paleo-conservative values would merely pepetuate and repeat the mistakes of the paleo-conservative past. Its very existence would ensure our nations destruction.

Hitchens stands, knees knocking with fear, before the ideal of Nationalism.

He fears and hates Nationalism as much as the Marxists and Capitalists fear and hate Nationalism.

Peter looks at Nationalism and his bottom lip quivers.

" Better a slow death and cultural alzheimers than rebirth and the nationalist revolution ", are the words of the old grey men of the past of the establishment political parties and their puppet politicians - or they are the whispers of a sly old wolf still hunting down its prey in the darkness of a deceit.

Hitchens wants our country chained forever to the dead historical weight of Conservatism and the Tory Party.

There can be only one response to Globalism and that is Nationalism.

By embracing and perpetuating the values and ideals of Conservatism we as a people and nation will merely perpetuate and repeat the mistakes of the past.

We demand a new future under Nationalism.

Hitchens demands we abandon politics, embrace a dead culture of conservatism and surrender our politics to an emasculated Tory Party.

If the worst that Hitchens can do for the country is demand a return to the obsolete ideology and politics of Conservatism in the Daily Mail, then he truly is the most dangerous Red in the country.

If he aint red, then he ought to be.

The Vicar of Fleet Street - Peter Hitchens

Dear peter makes a few points here below and I will respond.

http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2009/05/stop-killing-our-children-cried-the-hecklers-yes-we-can-chanted-the-obama-fans.html

I will analyse them and respond point by point in brackets beneath his comments, I have also posted them on his website so lets see if he responds and puts them up or censors them as usual ;

I've likewise done what I can to explain why the BNP should not receive the support of any civilised person.


( But people should support and vote for those who civilised people in the Tory Party and Labour Party who voted to attack Iraq and slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocent people and waste the lives of hundreds of British soldiers. Your civilised people are crooks and war criminals. Your civilised political people in the establishment parties are the scum of the earth )

I have examined the BNP. I have met its activists and its leader, and read its key documents, which is more than many of its supporters have done.


( here we go - silly peter )

It contains both pitiful, unhinged Judophobes and convicted criminals.


( Ad Hominem attack again eh peter. No war criminals in our ranks though or proffesional criminal fraudsters like in all the other parties. And lets ignore our Jewish members and supporters and councillors. No perjuring lords, paedophiles, and fraudsters in our ranks. )

Its own constitution (I point out for the fiftieth time) clearly and unambiguously defines it as a racially-bigoted party.

( Tsk, Tsk, peter - if the BNP is 'bigoted' then so are the Black Police Officers Association, the AFRO-CARIBBEAN LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, the Black Lawyers Association ETC and all those other black / jewish / muslim groups and charities that work for their communities only. They all have ethno-specific memberships that seek to represent the interests of their community in the multi-cultural process. You may not notice we live in a multi-cultural society where the community that does not organise to represent its interests loses out socially, politically, culturally etc etc. If you dont like multi-culturalism then scrap it - until then dont call us racist for organising to protect our interests as a community. We have already lost enough of our rights and culture because we have not organised to protect purselves in the past. )

There is no doubt that this specific, declared bigotry loses the BNP important support. No Christian, for instance, can conscientiously support it, as both Old and New Testaments unequivocally point out that all men are made in the image of God, and that Christ does not distinguish between 'Jew and Greek, slave and free'.


( Crikey peter is now an authority on the Bible, but lets let him have rather warped view of Christianity as a liberal cult where those that refuse to see the difference between the races that god created have to be expelled from gods church. You dont have to be a Christian to join the BNP, we are a secular party not a christian cult )

(It is the Darwinist survival-of-the-fittest merchants whose philosophy underpins fantasies of racial superiority, though they try to wriggle out of this nowadays).
( The BNP have never stood for racial superiority, another petty lie peter )

Yet the BNP leadership will not abandon it. If the 'policies' they currently adopt (for opportunistic rather than principled reasons) were their real objective, and they were truly concerned for the future of the country, then they would purge themselves both of this poison and of the unrepentant Holocaust-deniers and similar toxic swivel-heads still in their ranks. They could do this out of genuine repentance, or solely out of a self-interested desire for power.



( AAAAH so peter wants the BNP to be UKIP and another flaccid pseudo-party that offers no real competition to the tories but merely ensures the tories remain on the right )


Either would be rational actions, and repentance would actually be a genuine step forward.


(repentance for what - not being the tories and UKIP ? )


However, their bigotry is their fundamental driving force, and so central to them that they cannot abandon it, which is why they cannot and will not do this, even though their inaction harms them greatly. That bigotry will continue to inform and direct everything that they do. It is central to their purpose and being. And that is why it would be both wrong and mistaken for anyone to vote for them.

( Bigotry now. Is peter calling the black police officers association etc bigots who espuse bigotry ? if he isnt then he is as usual talking out of his arse )


BNP enthusiasts don't address this point, because they can't, without admitting that their main motivation is racial prejudice, which they understandably prefer not to do (though this restraint is absent from various nasty websites where BNP supporters, unleashed, let their true feelings show).


( No peter we do not support racial prejudice we fight for our rights as the indigenous British people in the multi-cultural process. Wait until Harriet Harmans new equality laws legalise positive discrmination racism against whites then when you get the sack, and your kids cant get a job, you will get the picture peter. It will be too late then though for you peter ? )

Instead they make rude remarks about me, which are of course very welcome from such a source.


( we dont make rude remarks about you peter, we actually think you talk a lot of sense , but you are paid by the media scu that pimp out the political pigs to the masses and he who takes the cursed gold becomes owned by their evil masters - you do what you do as you have no real choice )

When one of them does address it, or makes an honest effort to do so, I'll respond.


( Okay peter here it is - respond )


Otherwise not. It is sad to see well-intentioned gullible people being fooled by this unpleasant formation.


( are we talking about the BNP here or the tories ? )


Modern politics seems to consist largely of the well-intentioned being fooled by scoundrels of one kind or another.


( and modern politics is run by media corporations that subvert democracy and pay people like you to print stories that ensure the political pigs they support stay in power by exploiting well intentioned and good people )

So peter, instead of repeating crass Ad hominem attacks with the usual facile perjoratives in your articles, ask us the questions and we will respond point by point or submit them to Nick Griffin and he can.

Peter Hitchens - A Response

Dear Peter,

You have obviously realised that the Tory revival is dead in the water and the historical political and social paradigm of the Establishment, with its 'Free Market Capitalism Globalist Conservatism ' on the right wing as defined by the Tory Party, its Liberal Consenus Internationalist centre as epitomised by the Lib Dems and its left wing as defined by the Fabian Internationalist Capitalist New Labour Party, is now totally obsolete.

That ship has hit the rocks and sunk, along with the all the rest of the nations that followed the globalist convoy blindly onto the same rocks.

Thats what happens when nations act like dumb sheep.

You may see yourself as the lookout on the Titanic who saw the iceberg in the distance but whose frantic calls to the captain and his first officers were perpetually ignored, but in reality you have always been just another First Class Tourist and Passenger on the ship reaping your financial rewards from the system itself.

Like a proper 'Establishment safety valve' you whistled and blew loudly about the issues you were paid to publicise and propagandise by your Dail Mail Tory Party supporting aristocratic boss Lord Rothermere - including being loyal to the Tory Party, as opposed of course to being loyal to the castrated fop that presently runs it.

As a member of a mainly white, privileged class - this being a Journalist - you were never a victim of either Multi-culturalism or mass immigration.

You have always been nothing but a tourist in your own country Peter, detached by your money, class, privelige and lifestyle from real life and Britain.

All your missives and warnings were typed in a First Class Cabin on the top deck of the Titanic.

As a tourist you lived in a nice middle class white area, your kids went to private schools mainly full of fellow middle class white kids and your job was in an industry dominated by middle class white people.

You as journalist never faced the reality of losing your job to an immigrant who would do the work cheaper. You never lost your job, saw your wages drop and British jobs go to foreign workers.

You have nevered lived in the real world Peter.

Now the system that once sustained the Establishment is dead.

George Soros has compared the present collapse of global finance capitalism as the equivalent of the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Out of the wreckage arises new a form of politics.

That form is British Nationalism.

As Victor Hugo wrote ' Mightier than the tread of marching armies, is the idea whose hour has come'.

The Establishment dragged us into the abyss.

You profited from that system, therefore you are complicit in it.

To hear you now condemn the BNP, whose hands are unsullied with any guilt for this disaster as we have never passed a single law that created the crisis, is to hear the whimpers of a guilty man who knows that his crime has been discovered.

You are nothing but a scurrillous opportunist.

The rise of the BNP represents the British people reclaiming power in their country.

The yoke of the Establishment and its fetishes of Political correctness, Globalism, multi-culturalism, mass immigration, the Liberal Consensus and the rest of the ideological wreckage will all now be cast into the past, whilst the principles of British Nationalism will become the ideological guide for the development of our British national community into the future.