Multi-culturalism = Idiocracy

The end of multi-culturalism will come faster, the more it promotes the most stupid in our society into jobs they do not deserve solely on the basis of merit.

The more people are recruited simply on the basis of skin colour, and the more they make mistakes and cause people to get hurt as a result, the faster the entire structure of multi-culturalism will collapse.

Multi-culturalism is an Idiocracy, where idiots are promoted solely as they are not white.

Multi-culturalism carries the seeds of its own destruction ;


http://abc.daytonsnewssource.com/shared/newsroom/top_stories/videos/wkef_vid_6103.shtml

BOYCOTT The New Thor Movie

Image - Sif (the sister of Heimdall in the comic) and the actress who will play her. Errr, not much of a family resemblance is there.




Image - Heimdall in the Thor comic. Not very black is he.





Image - political correctness in action.





Would they get a white actor to play a black king in the movie version of The Lion King ?

Would they get a white actor to play a black part in Porgie and Bess ?

Would they get a white actor to play a black part in an film based on ancestral African myths ?

No - of course they wouldnt.

But hey, its okay to cast a black actor in the role of Heimdall in the film of Thor.

Frankly Idris Elba should be embarrassed for accepting the part.

Everyone knows he only got the role because of some perverted wish of Kenneth Brannagh to appear Politically Correct and throw in a black face into an movie about Nordic myths.

To be frank he should feel a total prick.

This sort of overt PC casting makes normal people cringe and sets back race relations - as people just say to themselves ' Oh look another token black in a movie, makes a change dont it'.

The fact that a few black actors go along with this patrionising drivel by white directors reveals just how opportunistic they are, and also that they are prepared to embarrass themselves for a few quid.

Sorry but I wont go and see it.

Nor will the fans of the film - so lets boycott the movie.

Lets make sure it flops on its arse.

BOYCOTT THE THOR MOVIE.



http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2010/apr/27/idris-elba-thor-race-debate

Idris Elba defends Thor film role

Race debate stirs after London-born star of The Wire wins role as Norse deity Heimdall in Kenneth Branagh's new film Thor

* Digg it
* Buzz up
* Share on facebook (29)
* Tweet this (38)

* Sam Jones
* guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 27 April 2010 17.36 BST
* Article history

Idris Elba wears Viking helmet

Idris Elba goes through his paces as a Norse deity on the Friday Night With Jonathan Ross show. Photograph: Brian J Ritchie/Rex Features

Even for an actor who has played a vampire-hunter with a guilty conscience, a Baltimore crime lord with a taste for Adam Smith, and an asset manager with a stalker, the role of the Norse deity Heimdall – guardian of the burning rainbow bridge between the world of men and the world of gods – was always going to be a bit of a challenge.

But playing a god in Kenneth Branagh's forthcoming film Thor has turned out to be the least of Idris Elba's worries, after fans of the comic books turned on the star of The Wire for reasons that have nothing to do with his acting ability and everything to do with the colour of his skin.

When news emerged late last year that the 37-year-old black Londoner had been chosen to play Heimdall, "the whitest of the gods", a being who can hear the sap flowing in trees and look across time and space, many devotees of the Marvel comics on which the film is based flocked to online forums to weep, gnash their teeth and unleash a tide of indignation.

A fortnight ago, the actor told Jonathan Ross that his take on Heimdall was "Norse by way of Hackney, Canning Town". And at the beginning of the month, he told a press conference that he saw his casting as an encouraging step.

His view was not shared among the more vehement of the comic books' fans. "This PC crap has gone too far!" wailed one. "Norse deities are not of an African ethnicity! … It's the principle of the matter. It's about respecting the integrity of the source material, both comics and Norse mythologies."

Fellow fans were quick to nod their horn-helmeted heads.

"At the risk of sounding like a bigot, I think this is nuts!" said another. "Asgard is home to the Norse Gods!!! Not too many un-fair complexion types roaming the frigid waste lands up there. I wouldn't expect to see many Brad Pitt types walking around in the [first mainstream black superhero] Black Panther's Wakanda Palace!"

Elba, who was born in Hackney, north-east London, to a Ghanaian mother and Sierra Leonean father, has addressed such concerns in a string of recent interviews.

"There has been a big debate about it: can a black man play a Nordic character?" he told TV Times. "Hang about, Thor's mythical, right? Thor has a hammer that flies to him when he clicks his fingers. That's OK, but the colour of my skin is wrong?

"I was cast in Thor and I'm cast as a Nordic god," he said. "If you know anything about the Nords, they don't look like me but there you go. I think that's a sign of the times for the future. I think we will see multi-level casting. I think we will see that, and I think that's good."

Elba, who shot to fame as the erudite and thoughtful gangster Stringer Bell in critically acclaimed US television serial The Wire, also used his interview with TV Times to warn viewers against pigeonholing his new BBC crime drama, Luther, just because it was about a black policeman.

"I think we'll put ourselves in a corner if we just describe Luther as a black detective," he said. "There haven't been many in the past, but the fact that he's black is neither here nor there."

The actor added that while it was "great to have a character who happens to be black in the central position … he still bleeds, just like anyone else".

Elba is working in the US and was unavailable for comment yesterday.

However, his publicist flatly dismissed any suggestion of a row between fans and film-makers, telling the Guardian that the actor was merely being mischievous. "There's no controversy," said Rupert Fowler. "Idris was being flippant in the [TV Times] interview."

His UK agent, Roger Charteris, said Elba had chosen the role of Heimdall on artistic rather than political grounds. "He just wanted to do the movie and work with Kenneth Branagh.

"He liked the script and he liked the movie and he had always wanted to work with Kenneth Branagh. It wasn't like a statement: 'Oh, I'm going to do this.' It's always a purely creative decision."

Or perhaps Elba was seeking to emulate his fellow British actor and Wire costar Dominic West. Last year, West – who has played the Ukrainian-Russian son of Pablo Picasso, a Spartan statesman and a French detective – revealed he had decided to accept the part of the Australian scientist Professor Howard Florey in a BBC TV drama about the discovery of penicillin, in protest against non-English actors playing famous English roles. "I was sort of smarting from Russell Crowe coming over here and playing Robin Hood and all these foreigners coming over here and stealing our great heroes," he said, his tongue lodged firmly in his cheek. "I felt I was striking a blow back by being a Brit playing a foreigner."

The Equality and Human Rights Commission said: "It's up to the casting director and producers to decide who is suitable for a role. It is not actually illegal to discriminate for authenticity purposes in the theatre. There is an exception under the Race Relations Act which says if it is required for the role, you can ask for someone of a certain colour."

The Pilkingtons and Idiot PC Police

Image - the forgotten white victims of police political correctness.




Can you imagine what would have happened if a black family had suffered 33 serious criminal acts of harassment in less than a year.

Can you imagine what the police would have done if white youths set fire to their gates, threw bricks through the window, kidnapped their son and held him hostage at knifepoint and put dog excrement through their letterbox.

They would have arrested them faster than you can say 'McPherson Report'.

Then the BBC would have had an investigation, the government would have had an inquiry set up and a new multi-cultural martyr set up for the masses to abase themselves before, whilst of course ritualistically debasing and flagellating themselves.

Fiona and Francesca Pilkington were white.

Therefore they did not matter.

Not in the slightest.

What mattered to the idiot police in their area was that the 'young people' who were persecuting this family were not 'criminalised' and that they did not feel 'persecuted' by the police for persecuting the people they live near.

If anyone in the area had grabbed those thugs and given them the damn good kicking they deserved to stop them doing it again - then they would have been in prison faster than you can say 'Oi, Wot about my y'uman rites'.

This is how Political Correctness has destroyed the police force, destroyed our communities, allowed the criminals to rule our streets and forced normal people and the most vulnerable in our society to live in absolute terror.

All this whilst the PC coppers play dress up in Burkhas, send ethnic gangsters on days out on fishing trips and send white thugs on holidays.

The police are now the enemy of our society.

They have swallowed the codswallop of political correctness hook, line and sinker and now regard themselves as an adjunct of the social services, rather than crime fighters.

The ACPO arseholes, greased into power by sucking up to New Labour, in return for their positions follow the labour party line.

At every level our society has been corrupted by the Unelected Left - including the police who are led by the slimiest, most bent cabal of politicised coppers in British history.

Their priority is always racism.

Not all racism of course, just racism against the pet minorities of the PC elites, not ever racism by ethnic minorities against the indigenous majority.

Anti-White racism is simply ignored by the police, just as it is ignored by the Equality Commission and the New Labour race relations profiteer, nepotist and bent businessman Trevor Phillips - who can always find a few thousand quid to throw at his mates with a dodgy contract or two.

In the meantime, the majority have been abandoned.

The minorities, from the white liberal political correctness Nazis to the Islamists and the ethnic gangsters - they all control our society.

But because of political correctness no-one will dare say this for fear of being called racist.

Evil triumphs when good men do nothing, Edmund Burke said.

Evil also triumphs when good people stay silent for fear of being called racist.

The thugs who undertook this campaign of harassment should have been arrested, taken to court and then flogged.

If that didnt work then they should have been made to wear a pink tutu and sweep the streets whilst people jeered at them and threw rotten fruit at them. At the same time the widescreen TV's and DVD's and playstations in their homes should have been removed and given to their victims and the parents fined.

Thugs see a police record and a electronic tag as a badge of pride, so the only thing that will stop them is public humiliations.

If that didnt work then the thugs should have been put in the stocks and people invited to throw rubbish and dog shit at them for a weekend. Once they had felt what fear and humiliation felt like, then perhaps they would have been less likely to inflict fear and humiliation on others.

If that didnt work then the parents should have been flogged and the kids sent to prison.

It is time for political correctness to be abandoned, and our nation run in the interests of the majority not for minorities.

The Positive Discrimination President

Obama is worse than useless.

You all know it.

You voted for him not because of his skills or the content of his character but simply because he was black and because the media told you that if you didnt vote for him then you were a racist.

And you suckers fell for it.

Obama is a glimpse of the future, a prefiguration of the inevitability of the death of the West from the pernicious infections of Political Correctness and Positive Discrimination.

Americans were faced with a choice - a President who had decades of political experience at all levels of politics but who was white or one who had virtually no political experience but who was black.

America therefore opted for Positive Discrimination - they chose to give the less qualified candidate the job simply because he was black and by so doing signed the death warrant for America's future.

Do you liberal morons really think that in China they give a toss about Positive Discrimination - of course they dont.

In National Socialist China they have only one aim for their society - the most brilliant get given the best jobs.

Whilst in the West what happens is that the less qualified, the less skilled and the less intelligent are given jobs simply because of their race. The better qualified if they are the of the wrong race dont get the job.

At the moment we have Affirmative Action where if two equally qualified people apply for a job then the Non-White gets it simply because they are not White, but the Equality Bill legalises Positive Discrimination where the less qualified non-white will be given the job instead of the better qualified White.

Though this has been happening informally for decades, where the less qualified Non-White are being goven jobs so that the employer can demonstrate their anti-racist and politically correct credentials or apply for lucrative contracts with councils that demand quoatas be filled as regards non-whites - the Equality Bill will allow Positive Discrimination to be legalised and in effect create an Anti-White Racist state.

It is no coincidence that the same Equality Bill enacts legislation that will seek to ban the BNP, the one organisation in our country that represents the interests of the White indigenous community and that seeks to prevent politically correct racism against indigenous whites, at the same time as it legalises Positive Discrimination.

The Equality Bill is a declaration of war against us. It is the creation of a Liberal Fascist State and it must be resisted.

The idea that recruiting less qualified non-whites and leaving better qualified Whites on the dole will increase racial harmony is insane. As soon as people start dying because less qualified non-whites are getting jobs not on merit but simply because of their race then the faster the whole PC state system will collapse.

How do you think this insanity will affect the West in the future when we have idiots running the country simply because their skin tone dictated their ability to get employment ?

It is just so ironic that within one generation we have gone from a situation where skin colour damaged a persons employment ability to one where skin tone is now the primary basis for an individuals employment - and in the process we have abandoned talent, qualifications and individualism for a politically correct system which is even more pernicious than the old 'nudge, nudge wink, wink' type of informal racism.

The old style of informal racism was usually the preserve of pathetic venal people who knew what they were doing was wrong and illegal but they did it anyway, whilst now the New Racism is state sanctioned and legalised and regarded with almost moral fervour.

The New Racism is explictly racist and has legalised every form of racism that it once frowned upon - in the name of 'equality' it has imposed Positive Discrimination and quotas, both of which are the most de-humanising racist dynamics present in our society today.

The New Racism doesnt see individuals it only see's races and thereby legitimises race hatred against whites.

If you are white male in this country you are now in a far worse position than any black male in British history - primarily because whilst previous forms of racism were shunned by most of society and illegal, the New Racism is legal, accepted by the mass of society and because it is based on the terrorism of the word 'racist' being deployed against anyone that dares point out the innate racism of the New Racism, goes unchallenged in the media and society generally.

Positive Discrimination is the most evil and insidious form of racism ever invented.

It is based on lies and deceits, and yet anyone daring to question it is instantly designated a racist.

Positive Discrimination in effect states that our entire society is racist and everyone everywhere who is white is racist and that therefore a racist anti-white state must be built which removes the civil and legal rights of white people to ensure that blacks and other privileged groups are able to take extra rights for themselves.

Positive Discrmination says that white people, who are the majority in Britain and America, have their jobs not because of their individual skills and talents but simply because they are white. It also says that the reason why blacks and other non-white groups are not 'represented' in proportion to their numbers in the overall population in any employment sector is because of racism - regardless of the fact that those jobs may be in areas of the employment sector that have traditionally may not have attracted members of those non-white groups.

At every level the White population are attacked and denigrated and excuses made for those who are not white - and in order to rectify this 'racist' imbalance then better qualified non-whites must be employed instead of better qualified Whites.

China must be laughing its bollocks off.

The more the West indulges in the suicidal death cults of Political Correctness and positive discrimination the faster it is about to fall.

China and those nations such as Russia that have lived through this trite Communist nonsense, as both Political Correctness and Positive Discrimination are both relics of the 20th Century Communist ideology, reject them in their entirety.

In both those countries they have built meritocracies where the issue of race is totally irrelevant - what matters is simply that the best and the brightest are promoted to the best jobs so the whole country benefits.

China and Russia regard political correctness and positive discrimination with the utter loathing and contempt it deserves - for both are nations predicated upon NATIONALIST politics.

Russia is a civic nationalist system predicated upon patriotism and meritocracy, whilst China is a National Socialist State predicated upon patriotism.

Only in the West has the ghost of Communism been allowed to haunt contemporary politics in the guise of political correctness and positive discrimination.

In those nations like Russia and China the entire Communist ideology has been exorcised completely - both may retain the symbols of Communism but both are Nationalist states.

Here in the West we retain the symbols of Nationalism for our states such as the national flags we wave for sports events (if the local councils are able to resist the fear of being called 'racist' when they do fly the national flag) but we are run by variants of liberalism and capitalism that are infected with the poison of Communism itself.

Obama is a glimpe of the future.

A man voted into power not because of the content of his character but simply because of the colour of his skin.

A man voted into power by the most racist vote in history - the black vote that was 96 % for Obama. Just imagine the howls of racism if whites voted as a racial block.

A man who is incapable of doing anything other than reading a teleprompter whose words were written for him ( and for doing this he is celebrated as a great orator by the white morons that run the media - even though a White man writes most of his speeches and all Obama has to do is read them, which he fails to do very often and then when the teleprompter breaks he is utterly lost ).

The West deserves all it gets.

The faster the fools that run the West destroy the West the better.

That way we, the inner barbarians who are despised by the liberals and leftists who are in the grip of their cults of political correctness and positive discrmination, can take power in the ensuing chaos with a mandate for radical change.

The faster the West implodes and collapses the sooner we can start to rebuild the West from within.

The sooner the idiot masses have their illusions ripped away from them and they are forced to confront cold, hard reality the better.

The day the West dies, is the day its rebirth begins.

Britain - a Soft Totalitarian State

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0%2C%2C25361297-7583%2C00.html?from=public_rss



Thought police muscle up in BritainFont S

Hal G. P. Colebatch | April 21, 2009

Article from: The Australian

BRITAIN appears to be evolving into the first modern soft totalitarian state. As a sometime teacher of political science and international law, I do not use the term totalitarian loosely.

There are no concentration camps or gulags but there are thought police with unprecedented powers to dictate ways of thinking and sniff out heresy, and there can be harsh punishments for dissent.

Nikolai Bukharin claimed one of the Bolshevik Revolution's principal tasks was "to alter people's actual psychology". Britain is not Bolshevik, but a campaign to alter people's psychology and create a new Homo britannicus is under way without even a fig leaf of disguise.

The Government is pushing ahead with legislation that will criminalise politically incorrect jokes, with a maximum punishment of up to seven years' prison. The House of Lords tried to insert a free-speech amendment, but Justice Secretary Jack Straw knocked it out. It was Straw who previously called for a redefinition of Englishness and suggested the "global baggage of empire" was linked to soccer violence by "racist and xenophobic white males". He claimed the English "propensity for violence" was used to subjugate Ireland, Scotland and Wales, and that the English as a race were "potentially very aggressive".

In the past 10 years I have collected reports of many instances of draconian punishments, including the arrest and criminal prosecution of children, for thought-crimes and offences against political correctness.

Countryside Restoration Trust chairman and columnist Robin Page said at a rally against the Government's anti-hunting laws in Gloucestershire in 2002: "If you are a black vegetarian Muslim asylum-seeking one-legged lesbian lorry driver, I want the same rights as you." Page was arrested, and after four months he received a letter saying no charges would be pressed, but that: "If further evidence comes to our attention whereby your involvement is implicated, we will seek to initiate proceedings." It took him five years to clear his name.

Page was at least an adult. In September 2006, a 14-year-old schoolgirl, Codie Stott, asked a teacher if she could sit with another group to do a science project as all the girls with her spoke only Urdu. The teacher's first response, according to Stott, was to scream at her: "It's racist, you're going to get done by the police!" Upset and terrified, the schoolgirl went outside to calm down. The teacher called the police and a few days later, presumably after officialdom had thought the matter over, she was arrested and taken to a police station, where she was fingerprinted and photographed. According to her mother, she was placed in a bare cell for 3 1/2 hours. She was questioned on suspicion of committing a racial public order offence and then released without charge. The school was said to be investigating what further action to take, not against the teacher, but against Stott. Headmaster Anthony Edkins reportedly said: "An allegation of a serious nature was made concerning a racially motivated remark. We aim to ensure a caring and tolerant attitude towards pupils of all ethnic backgrounds and will not stand for racism in any form."

A 10-year-old child was arrested and brought before a judge, for having allegedly called an 11-year-old boya "Paki" and "bin Laden" during a playground argument at a primary school (the other boy had called him a skunk and a Teletubby). When it reached the court the case had cost taxpayers pound stg. 25,000. The accused was so distressed that he had stopped attending school. The judge, Jonathan Finestein, said: "Have we really got to the stage where we are prosecuting 10-year-old boys because of political correctness? There are major crimes out there and the police don't bother to prosecute. This is nonsense."

Finestein was fiercely attacked by teaching union leaders, as in those witch-hunt trials where any who spoke in defence of an accused or pointed to defects in the prosecution were immediately targeted as witches and candidates for burning.

Hate-crime police investigated Basil Brush, a puppet fox on children's television, who had made a joke about Gypsies. The BBC confessed that Brush had behaved inappropriately and assured police that the episode would be banned.

A bishop was warned by the police for not having done enough to "celebrate diversity", the enforcing of which is now apparently a police function. A Christian home for retired clergy and religious workers lost a grant because it would not reveal to official snoopers how many of the residents were homosexual. That they had never been asked was taken as evidence of homophobia.

Muslim parents who objected to young children being given books advocating same-sex marriage and adoption at one school last year had their wishes respected and the offending material withdrawn. This year, Muslim and Christian parents at another school objecting to the same material have not only had their objections ignored but have been threatened with prosecution if they withdraw their children.

There have been innumerable cases in recent months of people in schools, hospitals and other institutions losing their jobs because of various religious scruples, often, as in the East Germany of yore, not shouted fanatically from the rooftops but betrayed in private conversations and reported to authorities. The crime of one nurse was to offer to pray for a patient, who did not complain but merely mentioned the matter to another nurse. A primary school receptionist, Jennie Cain, whose five-year-old daughter was told off for talking about Jesus in class, faces the sack for seeking support from her church. A private email from her to other members of the church asking for prayers fell into the hands of school authorities.

Permissiveness as well as draconianism can be deployed to destroy socially accepted norms and values. The Royal Navy, for instance, has installed a satanist chapel in a warship to accommodate the proclivities of a satanist crew member. "What would Nelson have said?" is a British newspaper cliche about navy scandals, but in this case seems a legitimate question. Satanist paraphernalia is also supplied to prison inmates who need it.

This campaign seems to come from unelected or quasi-governmental bodies controlling various institutions, which are more or less unanswerable to electors, more than it does directly from the Government, although the Government helps drive it and condones it in a fudged and deniable manner.

Any one of these incidents might be dismissed as an aberration, but taken together - and I have only mentioned a tiny sample; more are reported almost every day - they add up to a pretty clear picture.

Hal G. P. Colebatch's Blair's Britain was chosen as a book of the year by The Spectator in 1999.

Trevor Phillips Recants

And lo it came to pass that one day the exalted one, Trevor Phillips, doth deigned to remove the mark of cain from the forehead of the people.

Bearing his words forth from his Ivory Tower as a war trumpet upon the wind, Trevor stood upon the parapet and gaveth his lecture.

Multi-culturalism was a mistake.

Mass immigration has changed the nature of our society and was not supported by the people but simply the politicians.

The Police are not racist.

The McPherson Report definition of Racism was flawed and has created a Race Relations Industry that has not benefited either poor Blacks or poor Whites in Britain and in fact has made the lot of poor white people get worse.

Much of what was classified as racism in our society has only ever been about class, and that as a result of the obsession with Racism the poorest of all races in our society have suffered as a cabal of mainly white and a few ethnic middle class lawyers and professionals have grown rich.

The White Working Class have been impoverished, betrayed and abandoned as politicians enforced the creedo of political correctness.

That complaining about mass immigration is not racism but a legitimate concern for white British people.

The anti-thesis of each of these statements were just a year ago the very foundation of the British multi-cultural ideology.

Agreeing with any of the statements above up until just a year ago would have resulted in some white or ethnic middle class tosser pointing their finger at you and screaming 'WACIST' at you until they keeled over and died of heart attack.

Now it appears that the BNP were right all along. Those statements are what we have been saying for decades, and only now have we have been vindicated.

Calling anyone who dared disagree with a Maoist proponent of Political Correctness a racist was simply classic Marxist-Leninist Terrorism Of The Word. Unfortunately we have a British people made so thick by a sub standard education that they know nothing about history nor politics and we have a British media so corrupt that it uses its power to profit its owners rather than the public.

Anti-Racism is the new terrorism. It kills reputations, assassinates the good names and careers of people and it uses the media to terrorise people into cowed silence as the Witch Finder Generals once used the tactics of witch burning, pond ducking and whipping to terrorise the people into silence as they grew rich off hunting witches.

The Maoist cult of Political Correctness, which is the ideological precursor of Anti-Racism, is a form of Terrorism most clearly defined during the Cultural Revolution.

We have had our own cultural revolution in the UK, but unlike the Maoists in China the Maoists in the UK were happy to kill only your good name, reputations and careers.

The silent assassination of an individuals good name, social reputation and career is in many ways more evil than Maoist mass murder. In the capitalist system power is simply wealth, so therefore when one becomes a racial heretic for opposing political correctness, mass immigration or multi-culturalism one lost ones job and income - and then in effect were made powerless.

If they could not terrorise you into silence with threats to your career or reputation or via actual violence against you at the hands of red and communist lunatics, you were then lablled as 'insane'.

Every old trick in the Soviet Hndbook for repressing dissidents and democracy were revisited by the race relations terrorists and their fellow travellers in the Zionist and Liberal Elites. They are still using the same old tricks even now - take a look at the Zionist Network on Lancaster Unity and see how they still like to call people 'insane' etc when in fact the people that run the site such as Denise Garside has a history of mental illness and depression whilst others who run the site are known drug addicts. The soviets used to label anyone who resisted the communist system as a lunatic and imprison them in mental hospitals, and as usual the same leftist lunatics are using the same soviet tricks.

For the racial terrorists of political correctness to set out to destroy individuals, simply for exercising their inalienable right of free speech and their right to resist political correctness, was an campaign of criminality and terror on a par with the IRA.

Whilst the IRA blew up buildings the Maoist racist terrorists of political correctness took them over. Whilst the IRA killed and exiled its dissidents, the Maoists exiled them to the margins of our societies, ruined their careers so that they and their families were left in poverty, they ruined their good names and reputations by smearing them as 'racists' and they terrorised an entire nation into silence whilst a corrupt political elite and the swarm of race relations profiteer parasites that followed it, took control of our democracy.

In our system the individual labelled as a 'racial heretic' is going to suffer the slow torture of poverty, alienation and slander. Through a sickening inversion of morality, the racial terrorist is in fact regarded as praiseworthy rather than the scum they are.

Only know are the race relations bigwigs like Trevor Phillips admitting that they were totally wrong.

The reason why they are doing this now is because they know that it is all about to blow up in their faces.

Phillips has created a managerial Master Class of diversity specialists, race relations advisers, lifestyle advisers etc who are not ethnic minorities - they are white. The race relations revolution led to a whole new white master class of beauracrats taking power, not blacks and others.

Phillips has finally woken up to the reality that the issues that have been blamed on racism for decades were really about class.

The main side effect though is that the race relations revolution has entrenched and widened class differences and excerbated racial divisions and tensions.

The white working class now realise that their role in the race relations revolution was to stay silent and vote labour whilst they were disenfranchised, impoverished and their jobs taken away.

Now the poor white working class have had enough and they regard the race relations revolution as the source of their suffering.

We want it, and the white parasite managerial master class that run it, off our fucking backs.

One way or the other this entire monstrous machinery of repression labeled the race relations industry will be smashed and destroyed.

With it will go all the middle class scum parasites that profited from it.

The gap between the white working class and the multi-cultural progressive elite is now so wide that is not just unbridgeable - it is revolutionary.

The conditions are in place in this country for a civil uprising, for a new levelling of the land.

Be that via the ballot box or other means we shall see, but the levelling of this land will occur.

We have been slandered, vilified, impoverished, sneered at, despised and robbed of our rights. What fool thinks we will comprimise with the scum that did that to us.

Trevor Phillips speaks not with pride of what he has done, he speaks because of fear.

He knows that whilst the master class sit in their Ivory Towers and plot their fantasy wars against terrorism, racism, democracy and dissidents - the people are in revolt.

Thanks to the race relations Maoists we now have nothing to lose but our chains.

Political Correctness will trigger the Nationalist uprising and the Nationalist Revolution.

In an irony of history it will have been the Maoists and the Marxists who have created the social conditions for a revolutionary nationalist renewal in our country.

We await only the spark that will ignite the coming conflagration.

This is where the Marxists Are

At the end of the Cold War the ideology that Communism was totally defeated.

Its economic theories were revealed as false by the conquest of Capitalism and the failure of immiseration to occur, the theory of Dialectical Materialism was proved as bogus by the failure of the Working Class to rise up and create the Communist state, Quantum Physics proved that the theory of Dialectical materialsm based on it being a science was bogus and therefore that the problem of Self Refutation destroyed Marxism by it having to accept it was also a victim of False Consciousness, as its ideological basis as a science ( bogus in itself as it is an ideology) was destroyed by chaos theory and understandings of the chaos and randomness at the heart of the quantum universe.

All that was left for the Marxists to do was begin their Culture War against the West with Political Correctness and Multi-Culturalism.

The latest emanation of this Culture War is the 'diversity agenda' and the demand by Marxists in the Fire Brigade for Quotas.

Quotas are racist - they impact ONLY upon indigenous White British people.

Those that call for quotas are directly discriminating against the ethnic majority in order not to support ethnic minorities, but to continue and promote their culture war against the West.



Politically correct brigade demands one woman on each fire engine
Fire engines will have to have at least one firewoman on board in order to meet diversity guidelines, town hall leaders claim.

By Ben Leach
Last Updated: 2:26AM GMT 29 Dec 2008

The Local Government Association (LGA) has said that at at least 15 per cent of those in operational roles should be female.

That means they will fill one of the five or six places for crew on each engine.

The LGA said an increased number of firewomen is necessary "to meet the needs of local people".

But critics warned that political correctness was being put above the ability to save lives.

Susie Squire, of the Taxpayers' Alliance, said: "Introducing this sort of quota to the fire service is a big mistake.

"If ever there was a job that should be awarded on merit and physical fitness, it is that of a firefighter.

"This quota system will not only cost taxpayers money by introducing additional and unnecessary administration, but could risk the safety of all of us in the long run."

At present fewer than one in ten firefighters are female.

In future local councillors who are appointed to serve on the fire authorities will be asked to sign up to the "diversity charter".

One of the pledges they are expected to make is to "work to achieve recruitment targets of at least 15 per cent for women in operational roles".

Anthony Duggan, head of fire services at the LGA, said: "The fire service needs to be representative of the area it serves.

"It is important that the fire service attracts more women and ethnic minorities so that it can work more effectively in partnership with local authorities and other organisations to meet the needs of local people."

The Left Self Analysis = we are middle class capitalist lackeys

Image - Che Guevara drinking a bottle of coka cola, symbolic of socialism being fed by capitalism.


The left admit that they and their 'elite' of middle class academics and parasites of the Servile State are lackeys of capitalism working to ensure the perpetuation of their ranks and priveliges, whilst the workers are used as cattle.

What used to be called a form of ' Economism' where the trade unions and socialists deliberately sought to keep the working class poor in order to create a radical base of activists for them to use as part of the process of Dialectical Materialism, is now a form of Capitalism - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economism

Trade unions were used not to empower and assist the working class but to keep them in poverty in order to ensure a radical alienated mass who were one day able to be brought to revolution.

The aim of the trades unions is not to help workers, but to ensure they serve the unions and the left and the labour party, and to keep their parasite trade union bosses and functionaries in wealth and power.

Socialism is now PC Capitalism - the corporations and capitalists with their corporation and business taxes subsidise the Servile State and the army of politically correct leftists that run the Servile State.

We have the worst of all possible worlds - political correctness in the public sphere controlled by the Servile State and Capitalism dominates the private sphere destroying freedom for consumerism.

At all sides the individual and individualism is denuded and attacked both by capitalism and its whore sisters political correctness and liberalism.

The capitalists fund socialism.

The Left and Right are dead - there is only the capitalists and NATIONALISTS.

The only revolution is NATIONALISM !

Comrades of the National Revolution, the struggle for power begins.



http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/oct2008/col1-o04.shtml


The left groups are made up in the main of social layers drawn from the public sector and academia, many of whom have secured positions within the apparatus of the trade unions which they view as the guardians of the material and political relations on which they themselves depend. Their leftist rhetoric, including the occasional invocations of revolution, were and are always directed towards urging the working class to put pressure on the labour and trade union bureaucracy to more energetically defend wages and social conditions.

Thus they offered themselves only as political advisers to whatever might pass for a leftward section of the bureaucracy? anyone who still made noises about securing social reforms in order to maintain a level of support in the working class. Their new parties were to be an alternative home to the Labourites and trade union leaders who they anticipated would be forced to break from Labour by the “pressure from below”.

The essential reason for the failure of their various initiatives is that no such break has occurred.

Labour’s evolution was not the product of a few bad leaders, but the impossibility of any longer combining an advocacy of social reform with the entire bureaucracy’s essential function as defenders of the profit system. With the bourgeoisie everywhere seeking to claw back previous social concessions and compromises in order to compete for global investment and markets, the highly privileged strata represented by the bureaucracy translated this into a series of policies and political imperatives based on the insistence that socialism had failed and that the market could not be challenged. With a few complaints, the entire bureaucracy moved ever more firmly into alliance with big business—with the so-called lefts managing to reconcile themselves to a government just as far to the right as the Conservatives economically. Even the Iraq war and the mass opposition to it led to only one (enforced) defection from Labour’s ranks by a national figure—Galloway. And despite the occasional threats to redistribute the political levy, the trade unions continue to overwhelmingly fund Labour.

The BBC, Hurricane Katrina and the Obama Effect

Image - From the political left to the political right, all of the politicians are puppets of the media and the public are slaves of the media.




The pictures of the 100,000 german lemmings lining up to listen to a speech of Barack Obama is evidence of the utter, horrifying power of the media to influence and manipulate the minds of the public, both in Europe and America.

This Obama hysteria in the US, Europe and germany is a sign of a deep sickness in all our democracies, and also a deep sickness in the soul of the german people.

Of the crowds that came to see him in germany not one of them would have any ideas of the policies of Obama, his ideas or his plans if elected - they come because they have been taught to come.

Political correctness has unleashed a terrorist war against the psyche and soul of the german people and the white race in particular.

The enemy marked for eradication and extermination by Political Correctness is the White Race itself.

Political correctness seeks the extermination of the entire genetic lines of the white phenotypes.

It is a genocidal, insane ideology that rules by fear and by directing hatred against its opponents.


It has inculcated a sense of shame and guilt for the war that has been passed like some defective mental gene from generation to generation. Political correctness is how each generation is infected with his poison.

The endless incultation of poisonous war guilt in the minds of young people in germany has resulted in the creation of a pathological germany, a germany sick, twisted and at war within itself.

The german people have a death wish. They abort their children and their future in the name of excorcising the ghost of the past.

Political correctness is the terrorism of the soul.

This terrorism of the soul has resulted in a poisonous self hatred that manifests as a cringing and servile obedience to the icons of liberalism peddled to the public in the media.

Obama is the perfect Liberal Icon for the conditioned masses.

His black skin allows the media to trigger the 'slave guilt reflex' inculcated in white children (inserted into their minds during school) whilst his part white racial heritage means he can be sold to the public as part of the 'inclusiveness' agenda and the new advertising niche that has taken hold in the mind of the media, that of the mixed race.

An mixed race actor in an advert is employed as you manage to hit all the racial demographics at the same time, and this is also why the mixed race relationship is now a staple of the advertising industry.

The fact that the BBC showed live the speech of Obama in Berlin was an example of the way the media has such power to influence the British public.

I cannot remember any time before where the BBC has interrupted the news at 6 to show a speech from an American Democratic candidate on a visit to a foreign country.

THIS WAS PURE MANIPULATION - the intent was to violate the perceptions of the British public and to bolster the Obama reflex.

As I type this Obama has been on the BBC news live for over 5 minutes.

I have no doubt the BBC will not allow John McCain the chance to speak live to the British public when he visits a foreign country.

The fawning, sickening, lickspittle liberal scumbag of the BBC, Matt Frei, as usual was introducing Obama.

The BBC love to use Matt Frei, the blonde cringing male poster boy for the self hating white liberal elite. As he is of German heritage how fitting the BBC saw it to use this servile lackey of the liberal elite to fawn over the latest icon of liberalism.

He is the same arsehole who they also used to peddle the myth during the New Orleans floods, that the floods themselves were George Bush controlled genocidal attacks on the 'poor black descendants of slaves'.

The population of New Orleans at the time of the flood was only 28 % white, but the numbers of white people dead in the New Orleans flood represented 33 % of the total of victims.

This means whites were disproprotinately victims of the floods.

But do you remember the way the media chose to peddle the floods - as though they were some sort of black holocaust deliberatly inflicted by a Bush controlled Nazi organisation (FEMA) who let a concentration camp for black americans (New Orleans) to be deliberatly flooded.

It was Matt Frei in his canoe paddling amongst the bodies talking bullshit who did most to perpetuate this lie.

Race did play in the New Orleans floods - if you were white you were more likely to die.

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/12/12/103853.shtml

I cannot remember a single news report from the BBC where the plight of whites was reported in such a race based way as the plight of blacks.

Whilst black mobs threatened to rape lone white women in the Super Dome ( where there were at least 6 murders, and 12 rapes among the enclosed evacuees ) the BBC REFUSED TO RELEASE THAT INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC ! The BBC mentioned the race attacks here ;

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/wear/4208792.stm

But not once did the news report on the BBC point out that whites were being murdered, raped and attacked by black mobs just because they were white.

You would have thought that such race attacks would have been of as significance as the flood itself, but the BBC refused to highlight those rapes.

IMAGINE THOUGH IF WHITE MOBS HAD BEEN RAPING BLACK WOMEN OR KILLING BLACK MEN - then you could just imagine the howls and paroxysms of the media over those vicious racial atrocities !

The only newspaper that revealed the race attacks on whites by blacks during the floods was an Australian one here ;

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,16473521-663,00.html

Note her comments ' it has turned into a BLACK AGAINST WHITE thing ' - not as usually peddled by the media a WHITE AGAINST BLACK thing - note how the subtle movement of just two words completely change ones conception of the incidents.

The media always report such things as 'white against black' but in this case, due to the witness stating what happened, we get a verbatim report of the facts not a media spin of the facts which changes the entire emphasis of the facts.


The article here debunks the bullshit BBC / Matt Frei propaganda offensive about the New Orleans floods killing more blacks than whites and the response to the floods being a 'racial incident' against blacks ;

http://www.americanthinker.com/2005/09/new_orleans_myths_the_numbers.html

In fact the real racial impact was after the floods, take a look at how the crime rates rose after residents of New Orleans were moved to other areas and the crimes rates went through the roof ;

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/05/AR2006020500884.html

http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Crime_in_New_Orleans_sharply_increases_after_Hurricane_Katrina


In the article below Jamie Glazov interviews Theodore Dalrymple (in real life London psychiatrist Anthony Daniels who works in a prison hospital) about political correctness and the damage that it does.

FP: You make the shrewd observation of how political correctness engenders evil because of “the violence that it does to people’s souls by forcing them to say or imply what they do not believe, but must not question.” Can you talk about this a bit?

Dalrymple: Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.

http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=D2C70DCE-BF86-4761-9788-03AB7FAB2608


The media is the primary tool of the destruction of our civilisation, culture and future.

It is the true Weapon Of Mass Destruction and Mass Deception that we should all fear.

The real terrorists killing our democracy are those that control the media.

Those that control the media and who control the people through the media, are the enemies of the people.

They are the destroyers of democracy, the usurpers of our cultures and the gravediggers of our race and nations.

Whilst the traitorous political elites pass the laws that kill - the media bury the truth for the politicians they get elected. The politicians commit the crime, the media cover it up.

The media get the politicians elected and then protect them as they destroy our countries and people.

The media are the enemy of everything we hold as sacred.

Political Correctness and The Killer Society

The slave begins by demanding justice and ends by wanting to wear a crown, he must dominate in his turn ".

Albert Camus, The Invincible Summer.








Political Correctness has evolved from its Maoist origins into a genocidal cult more akin to Nazism. It regards the White European Race, and the ethnic sub-sets it contains, as the evil agent in the history of humanity.

It is taught in our schools and universities, its propaganda is broadcast into our homes by the media and the government and it dominates both the public and private spheres of British society. Along with its corporate paymaster, Consumerism whose taxes sustain its tyranny, it totally controls and dominates our entire culture and society.

Its hate is even taught to our children in their universities ;

http://www.vdare.com/roberts/harvard_genocide.htm

Harvard educated Noel Ignatiev, an academic at Harvard’s W.E.B. DuBois Institute for African-American Research. Dr. Ignatiev is the founder of a journal, Race Traitor, which has as its motto, “treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.”

The journal’s purpose is “to abolish the white race.”

As Susan Sontage said, " The white race is the cancer of human history." (Partisan Review, Winter 1967, p. 57

Ethnic groups classify us as White Devils - http://www.geocities.com/joao_marri/africapart21.html

The Nation of Islam has its Death Angels to slaughter us - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zebra_murders

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article2890947.ece

http://www.racismeantiblanc.bizland.com/005/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2004/aug/22/race.ukcrime

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=439284&in_page_id=1770&ct=5

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1576499/Fire-brigade-'discriminating-against-white-men'.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/oct/22/ukcrime.race

Step by step, stage by stage a society is prepared by propaganda and conditioning for the removal and extermination of a section of their own population.

Political Correctness is the latest manifestaion of this human process.

It has replaced history with propaganda and lies, and seeks to transform our society into a charnel house, a nightmare of perpeptual racial struggle by ever growing alien immigrant groups against our race, folk and kin.

The call below for an entire section of British society to be regarded as 'less than human' by the politician and public spkesman of the primary body responsible for protecting all our civil and human rights, is the most chilling call for mass murder and pogroms made by a British politician in the entire history of Britain.

It is in effect a 'green light' for genocide to go ahead, as if the head of the government and state body responsible for protecting minorities actively propagandises that a section of society are less than human, then this can be seen as tacit approval for the removal of that section of society.

The whole history of the 20th century has been out about Sociocide and Genocide.

The latter killed millions under Nazism, whilst the former killed over a hundred million under Communism.

As a Leninist, and avid fan of books about the Bolshevik Revolution and the Russian Civil War, Trevor Phillips knew precisely what he was trying to do when he used the lanaguage of the Communist Sociocide.

The process of transforming individuals and a societies into genocidal machines begins when one section of a society is designated as less than human by another more powerful section of society.

By classifying them as less than human, then they do not have human rights.

They are dehumanised and their humanity denied, their status lowered to that of animals.

Once they are regarded as animals, then like all other animals they may be slaughtered by human beings.

Once a section of society is regarded as little more than animals by a more powerful section of society and this belief is then legitimised and authorised by the State or employees of the State, then nothing exists to stop the 'humans' demanding the death of the animals amidst them.

All that is required in order to create the social situation where pogroms may erupt is for the 'animals' to be linked with incidents of criminality propagandised by the media.

Such an example of this type of propaganda would to label a section of society as less thn human and then state that this section of society is attacking 'innocent women and babies' and therefore the human beings must rise and dal with the animals in their midst who are threatening their wives and children.

This same process has been used in human societies in order to start and wage civil wars since the days of the Roman Empire.

This is the process of creating a 'Killer Society'.

The Killer Society is the human society where individual humans are conditioned to take part in, or turn a blind eye to the existence of, the Killer Society itself.

The Killer Society is one where a political elite, at all stages of the social, political, economic, cultural, demographic, religious, environmental and national structures and processes have consciously set out to create a society where violence, murder, war and imperialism are accepted as part of the normal social processes.

Sociocide is the end result, and final stage of the Killer Society.

Political Correctness is merely an ideology of conditioning. It is designed to subvert the supremacy of free thought and replace it with slavery to propaganda.

The final stage of Politicial Correctness is Sociocide, for the process of political correctness is nothing more than a system of dehumanising societies in order to create the social conditions that lead to Sociocide.

The killer greatest asset is his ability to regard his fellow human beings as abstractions rather than a living, breathing, flesh and blood.

Only when our humanity has been stripped away from us can our lives be taken from us.

For the head of the state body to designate a section of society as less than human, is a crime against humanity.

I would ask people to make formal complaints to the police against Trevor Phillips for incitement to murder.

The comments are also examples of direct and public incitement to commit genocide and crimes against humanity.

Incitement to genocide is clearly an international crime (see Article 25 (3) (e) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court).

The Genocide Act 1969 lays down that a person commits an offence of genocide if he commits any act falling within the definition of 'genocide' in Article II of the Genocide Convention as set out in the Schedule of the Act.

Article II states:- 'In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such; (c) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or part.'

Article IV of the Genocide Act states that "Persons committing genocide . . . shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals."

By using the language of the Killer Society, then Phillips must now be regarded as an enemy of our national democracy and also of the indigenous British people.

He must be challenged in the courts and this language censured before Britain experiences its own pogroms, riots, civil insurrection and race wars directed against the indigenous White people of Britain who are expected to become a national minority group in about 50 years, and who are already minorities in many British cities.


To quote from the Herald:

“Scotland must guard against an increase in racism and attacks on asylum seekers, a leading equality watchdog has warned.

Trevor Phillips, chairman of the Commission of Equality and Human Rights, said there was a clear choice facing communities who are witnessing an influx of migrants.

Speaking at the STUC annual congress in Glasgow he said the choice was between welcoming people or fearing newcomers.

He urged people to turn their backs on racists in communities and at the ballot box and showed his contempt for the British National Party by saying they should be treated as “less than human”.

He said: “We will see communities standing up for asylum seekers who want to live as part of that community. We will see the Scottish government welcoming them as part of the fresh talent initiative.

“But we will also see the ugly face. We will see those who will assault a woman and baby simply because they are foreigners.

“We as a society have a choice. In England we have the BNP. The path is to keep them out We need to change in an inclusive way.”



Every revolutionary ends up either by becoming an oppressor or a heretic.

The New Socialism - Banking Bolshevism

The Northern Rock scandal has revealed that Britain is afflicted by the New Socialism, and this is the Bolshevism of the Banks.

Banks such as Northern Rock are in a unique position, they privatise their profits and socialise their losses.

This is part of the trend that began with the Fabians. Their motto and symbol was a wolf in sheeps clothing.

Socialism through the free market was the creedo of the Fabian movement and they have triumphed.

Today we have worst of all possible worlds - we have Political Correctness in the Public Sphere and Consumerism in the Private Sphere.

The profits of the corporations are taxed and used to subsidise the Servile State and its army of socialist politically correct minions all of whom depend upon the Labour Party for their fake jobs.

Individualism and liberty is under attack from all sides.

Consumerism seeks to replace individualism with Commodity Fetishism and turn us all into the tribes of Reebok, Armani and Gap whilst Political Correctness passes ever more laws that restrict free speech and creates Thought Crimes and Hate Laws to restrict democratic debate and deny us our ancestral liberties.

We have in fact created the ultimate fascist society, where the avdertising agencies pump out the creedo 'BELIEVE, OBEY, BUY' and the Hitler Jugend of Consumerism all wear their uniforms of trainers, tracksuits and baseball caps.

They love who are they told to love, hate who they are told to hate and wear what they are told to wear.

Even those who are rebel are manufactured ciphers. Revolution itself has become an aspect of consumerism.

If you want to be a rebel then you have to become a Goth, a Hippie or a Punk - each of which are cults dominated by an image and corporate commidity supply base that peddles their rebellion/conformity to them.

You want a leather jacket with Anti-Nowhere League written on it then visit a punk shop.

You want a Sid Vicious poster then go to Camden Market.

You want to buy a pair of leather goth boots with spikes and buckles then go to your local town centre.

Conformity and Rebellion are both different sides of the same coin, and the same people profit from both.

I remember when I used to go to the Glastonbury Festival and noticed whilst wading knee deep through the mud that all the stalls all sold the exact same things and that all the hippies were wearing the same uniform.

Consumerism conquered Glastonbury and the Hippies all sold out.

This process began in the Sixties with the Hippies who said that in order for us to be happy we must do as we wish, and that all social bond and conventions must be rejected if we are to be free.

This was the birth of the Selfish Society - not Thatcherism as the left like to claim.

It was the Hippies who destroyed society not the capitalists - the capitalists merely got rich exploiting what the Hippies did.

The New Socialism is where the State and the Corporations each profit mutually from each other.

Lenin in bed with Bill gates spawning a bastard Liberal Fascism.

Only by rejecting Consumerism and fighting Political Correctness and voting into power the BNP who will replace Globalism with Nationalism can we reclaim our liberty and our National Destiny.

The BNP and the ANC - PART 1

Nick Griffin is our Nelson Mandela.

One of the defining features of the Gordon Brown faction within the Labour Party that is now running the country is their defining obsession to ‘take back’ the symbols of Britishness from ‘the Far Right’. Gordon Brown is utterly obsessed with trying to create a politically correct and artificial version of British history and British culture that supports, and thereby promotes, the left wing political view of the Labour Party. He is always banging on about how the left must ’reclaim the British flag’ and promote a modern multi-cultural version of Britishness. As a disciple of the social theorist Robert Puttnam, Gordon Brown realises that unless a functional politically correct version of Britishness is created then the various ethnic tensions and social dynamics within multi-culturalism will mean multi-culturalism will collapse as a functional principle of social organisation at some point in the future.

Along with this attempt to redefine and recapture the symbols of British culture and history by Gordon Brown has been an attempt to describe history in a way that promotes the personalities and causes that they want to see regarded as examples of noble idealism by British society. For Gordon Brown the primary noble personality, and therefore the ultimate socially acceptable role model for whites in the world today, who is lauded for his so called ‘selfless idealism’ is Nelson Mandela. For the liberals and the left Nelson Mandela is a hero, not a terrorist.

They worship him like the Soviets once worshipped busts of Lenin and Stalin. His cause to overthrow apartheid and create majority black rule in South Africa is celebrated as a noble cause and statues to the man are now even erected in Parliament Square.

In this article I will offer a radical nationalist re-interpretation of Mandela’s struggle for black majority rule and explain how the liberals current view on Ethno-Nationalist struggles in Europe is both hypocritical but also logically and morally unsustainable when compared directly to Mandela’s struggles and aims. Whilst the ANC and Nelson Mandela should never be regarded as ’moral’ in any way due to their advocacy and use of terrorism as part of the political process, what is interesting is how the media and the liberal elite have managed to turn Mandela into a ‘hero’ without ever logically analysing what other political white majority movements could also be regarded as ’heroic and noble’ for following similar political aims, though with less criminal political methodology.

The ANC are a racist terrorist organisation based on communist ideology. It is an organisation to be despised and not admired. This article is an analysis of the logical inconsistencies of the Liberals view on the ANC and Nelson Mandela, and should not be taken in any way as implying any support for the ANC or Nelson Mandela. South Africa today is a racist state which has institutionalised racism against its white citizens just as Britain has institutionalised racism against its indigenous people. The purely cosmetic whiteness of South African sporting teams, such as the Springboks rugby team, is used to divert attention away from the ongoing pernicious racialism of the South African ANC government directed daily against its white citizens. Most whites in South Africa live in fear of the day that Nelson Mandela dies for they fully expect a black uprising that will inflict racist riots and pogroms against all whites. The brutalisation of white South Africans by racist criminals, especially racist rapes, is devastating the white community and hundreds of thousands of white South Africans have already fled the country. The New South Africa is becoming a racist terror state, not a representative democracy.

Even within the history of the ANC as regards the non-white population of South Africa we can see a racial dimension at work. The ANC represents mainly the Zhosa tribal group and their main enemy was always the Inkatha Zulu tribal group. Thousands have been murdered in ethnic and political warfare between the two tribal groups. Asians and mixed race people were also despised by the ANC for working with the whites. The whites that joined the ANC were mainly deluded idealists prepared to sing songs about killing whites and plant bombs in railway stations in order to curry favour and rise amongst the ranks of their black comrades. The fact that many of these white supporters of the ANC struggle have now fled South Africa citing the racism of the ANC regime is evidence once again of the idiotic idealism of the far left. The political rhetoric of the ANC is today blatantly racist against whites and the South African government supports the racist pogroms of Robert Mugabe in neighbouring Zimbabwe against white farmers. White farms are being seized by the ANC South African government and white businesses being punitively taxed by the South African government. White owned businesses are forced to hire blacks from the majority population, as opposed to hiring whites from the minority ethnic population as is usual under the rules of political correctness, or be fined by the government.

But it is a fact that the actions of Nelson Mandela and the ANC are defined by the liberals and the left in our country as noble. If this true for the ANC then the cause of the BNP must also noble and heroic. Unlike the ANC and Nelson Mandela though, our hands are not stained with the blood of innocents torn apart by bombs, burning tyre necklaces and bullets used to get into power. Unlike the ANC we in the BNP are a peaceful, democratic, political, social and cultural movement who reject violence and whose actions are at all times within the Rule of Law as defined by the British Constitution. That is in direct contrast to the ANC and the actions of Nelson Mandela.

Nelson Mandela is the most successful Racial Nationalist of all time.

He fought for and won Black majority democratic rule in South Africa in the face of determined opposition from a well organised white minority. Whilst Nelson Mandela and the ANC fought for democratic Black majority rule in South Africa, Nick Griffin and the BNP are also fighting for democratic White majority rule in Great Britain. Both the ANC and the BNP are the political mechanisms of an indigenous rights movement. The BNP represents the indigenous ethnic majority of Great Britain and the ANC represent the native black population of South Africa. The ANC fought against Apartheid as the mechanism of minority rule in South Africa, whilst the BNP fights against Political Correctness as the mechanism of minority rule in Great Britain.

Just as Nelson Mandela has been persecuted and prosecuted by the South African government for his political beliefs, Nick Griffin has also been persecuted and prosecuted by the British government for his political beliefs. As Nelson Mandela has experienced, Nick Griffin has also been charged with ’political crimes’ against the State, this being breaches of the so called Race Relations Acts and the Public Order Act 1986. Unlike the ANC though and also Nelson Mandela, Nick Griffin and the BNP have never used terrorism, murder, bombings and violence as part of their political methodology to attain power. The BNP have always been a political, social and cultural movement that have participated in the democratic electoral process and have rejected all forms of organised political violence even when we have been targeted and attacked by both the Far Left and agents of the State security services. We have never even organised to defend ourselves from the attacks by the organised Far Left in a way that would have ensured we could have dealt with the threats we faced. Even though we were abandoned by the police and the authorities we did not respond in any way to those who attacked us. Like the workers in the Mask of Anarchy by Shelley we merely folded our arms and looked upon those that attacked us with the utter contempt they deserved until their rage died away and they crawled away in shame and baseless pride. This means that the BNP are in fact a more ’moral’ movement than the ANC, and that Nick Griffin is a more ’moral’ politician than Nelson Mandela.

Nick Griffin is in fact Britain’s Nelson Mandela. Like Nelson Mandela and Nick Griffin, all BNP activists and member should be seen as heroic and noble people who selflessly dedicate themselves to the preservation and promotion of their country, culture and kin. According to the liberals and liberal media Nelson Mandela fought for majority black rule in South Africa in order to end minority white rule and create a representative democracy. The goal of the ANC that it frequently proclaimed was to ensure that South Africa was a democracy that represented the interests of the ethnic majority as opposed solely to the interests of its ethnic minority, this being the whites. In a way the BNP and the ANC fight for the same thing, though in vastly different ways, which is the right to organise political, social and cultural representation for the indigenous ethnic majority and to participate in the democratic political system. We are also both indigenous rights movements. Just like the ANC we are fighting against minority ethnic rule. For the ANC the enemy was Apartheid, for us it is Political Correctness.

Both Apartheid and Political Correctness are mechanisms of minority rule. They are both political systems of repression that assert the rights of ethnic minorities over those of the ethnic majority. In Britain, as it was in South Africa under apartheid, the ethnic majority are under direct Minority Rule. This is the Tyranny of the Minorities that is the basis of the burden of Minority Rule that we indigenous Britons are forced to tolerate and pay for. The Tyranny of the Minorities is when the rights and interests of ethnic, political, social and economic minorities within the nation take precedence over the social interests and democratic rights of the indigenous ethnic British majority. This is the basis of our nations system of Minority Rule.

In Britain today we are controlled by a cabal of minorities ; these are the rules of Political Correctness, Middle East oil billionaires that fund the political parties, the laws of the Race Relations Acts and Public Order Acts, the Liberal Consensus, Media Corporations, Leftists, Globalists, Dhimmi-Politicians, Sharia Socialists, immigrant lobby groups, Liberal Judges, PC vicars and religious faith leaders, religious pressure groups, corrupt union bosses, foreign corporations and supra-national political institutions such as the EU, ECJ, ECHR, WTO and NATO. Each of these groups represent only the rights and privileges of factions and minorities within the nation and do not the interests of the ethnic majority of British citizens.

Pressure group politics and professional lobby groups dominate the democratic consultative processes, whilst the functions of the legal system and the outcomes of legal cases are dependent upon those ethnic groups and other organisations that are financially able to access the legal system.

The New Apartheid in 21st Century Britain is based on Political Correctness. Just like apartheid was in South Africa, political correctness in Britain is a political mechanism designed to empower minority groups at the expense of the majority ethnic group. It is part of the Cultural Struggle and Racial Struggle of the left to subvert and destroy our native indigenous British society.

Over the decades a succession of minority Conservative and Labour governments have controlled the country via minority rule in order to advance their own sectarian interests. Not once has any of those governments had the democratic legitimacy of having the direct approval of over 50 % of the British population. The total electorate in the 2005 general election registered to able to vote was 44, 245, 939 in a country with a population of nearly 60 million - that means nearly 16 million people are not even registered to vote. 61.3 % of the total electorate able to vote actually bothered to vote. The present unelected Prime Minister Gordon Brown runs a government that was voted into power in 2005 with just 54.95 % of seats in Parliament with just 35.3 % of the vote and with the support of only 21.59 % of the British population ( not including the 16 million who did n ot register to vote). 79% of the British people did not vote for the present government, but the voices of the silent majority are not heard in the political process. Only 8 candidates in the whole country got more than 50 % of the votes cast in their favour - and hence had a democratic mandate. Labour won the election with a vote of 35.3 % of 61.3 % of those that actually turned out - not even a majority of those who bothered to vote. With a simple majority in Parliament the minority rule politicians can control the entire country.

That is not a legitimate democratic system. Neither is that a democratic mandate to rule, that is the very definition of Minority Rule and it is the capture of democracy through the capitulation of the majority to either apathy or alienation. These minority governments both left and right then undertake political programmes that primarily represent and reward the sectarian interests that support the parties themselves. The Labour Party passes laws to help the unions that fund it and gives knighthoods to the foreign businessmen that also fund it, whilst the Tories represent the interests of the global corporations and the foreign businessmen that fund its political campaigns. Neither of the three big parties represent the People, they represent only sectarian factions within society. The Trades Unions represent only the financial interests of the union bosses who grow rich on membership fees of the unions and also the sectarian political interests of the political groups the unions support. The only people the unions do not represent is the interests of British workers. They represent the interests of Cuban and Chinese workers, globalisation, asylum seekers, immigrants and ethnic minorities and do not ever represent the interests of British workers.

Minority Rule is also enforced in the New Apartheid British state by the Race Relations Acts and the Equality Department that contains the C.R.E. The C.R.E and the rest of the state funded race relations industry are mechanisms designed to empower immigrants and ethnic minorities at the expense of the indigenous ethnic majority. The role of the C.R.E. is to ensure that the law pro-actively discriminates against the ethnic majority and that we white indigenous Britons become second class citizens, and a racial underclass, in our own country. The C.R.E pro-actively works with the government and private companies to ensure that ethnic minorities are fast tracked and promoted into jobs they are not qualified for whilst whites are denied jobs and systematically penalised because of their colour and race. The C.R.E recommends new race based laws to the government that it wants to see put on the statute books. These new laws are designed to promote Positive Discrimination policies and Affirmative Action programmes that accelerate the disenfranchisement of the indigenous British people from the economic process. The C.R.E, the media and the Police all ignore and minimise racial attacks on whites in Britain,whilst race attacks against ethnic minorities are turned into political crusades to demand the removal of ever more rights for whites. The Police are routinely dragged before Employment Tribunals for racism against white officers and white applicants for jobs are denied interviews they are qualified for so that under qualified ethnic minorities can benefit from affirmative actions plans.

In the New Apartheid of Political Correctness a whole new system of totalitarian Minority Rule has been constructed that just like under classic apartheid is a classic fascist race based system and that rewards a person solely on the grounds of their colour or racial background and not on individual merit. Indigenous white Britons in Britain are now nothing more than second class citizens in their own country, and that second class status is now fully enshrined in the law itself.

Another mechanism of Minority Rule is the takeover of our democratic system by the media. The media propagandise the political parties that the public are conditioned into voting into power. The media decide who wins elections, not the people. Through their power to control public opinion, to selectively present facts and ideas to the public and their almost total control of public debate on political issues, the media effectively control who the public vote for. It is the minority of plutocrats, corporations and leftist editors and journalists that control the media who unilaterally decide what is politically acceptable in our society and thereby who gets elected into power. It is the media liberals and leftists in papers like the Guardian who advertise the governments politically correct Servile State jobs whose self appointed experts then tell us that we cannot have closed borders because immigration benefits our society and at the same time imports in ever more new Labour Party voters. It is the media capitalists in papers like the Daily Mail that support ‘controlled immigration’ as it brings in cheap workers and lowers British workers wages and thereby benefit’s the corporations that advertise and sell their products in the Daily Mail. The media do not represent the interests of the British people, they represent and promote the interests solely of the corporations or factional interests that own the media and the puppet political parties the media control. The role of the media is to ensure that the interests of the majority of British citizens are not represented by political representatives that they are conditioned into voting into power. The media promote and advertise only the political parties that they own. Then once in power those elected politicians then reward their media and corporate masters with laws that profit the corporations that own the media. Only the corrupt and the servile ever get elected into power by the media. The agenda of the media is to prevent political change, not represent the interests of the British people or the British nation. The role of the Media is to ensure that their own factional interests, left, right and liberal, are allowed to control the political development of society by denying access to any political parties that threatens media minority rule over the British electoral system. It is the media that says we cannot close the borders of Britain, that we cannot deport immigrant illegals and criminals, that we cannot scrap political correctness and the Race Relations Acts. It is the media that demands our total adherence to the totalitarian creedo of Political Correctness by labelling anyone that dares speak out as a ‘racist‘. It is the media that calls those political parties like the BNP that demand the removal of illegal immigrants and convicted immigrant criminals ‘racists’ and then use their pages to demand that the public not vote for them. It is the media that bears the primary responsibility for our plight.

Another aspect our Minority Rule is the takeover of the so called ‘independent’ legal process by minority groups and supporters of Political Correctness. The liberal Judges that have infiltrated the British legal system now routinely overrule British statute laws with bogus ’human rights’ arguments that put inane theories on universal human rights before the actual national security interests of the majority of the British people. Other Judges have political interests that interact with their judicial roles. The recent libel case involving the BNP activists Chris and Barry Roberts was heard before Judge Sir Stephen Sedley, a long time member of the British Communist Party and President of the British Institute of Human Rights with links to Liberty and Amnesty International, is a case in point. Under the dicta enshrined in the Pinochet Principle in Re Pinochet (1998) the Judge should have withdrawn from the case as a long time member of the Communist Party can scarcely be said to be ambivalent to nationalism and nationalist activists in their court. This rule for Judges is in place in order to ensure that there is no chance of any judicial bias in legal cases. The law requires that Judges ‘ Must not appear biased or impartial ‘ . The Judges adherence to the Communist cause in the Barry and Chris Roberts case meant the Judge was not fit to hear a case involving well known Nationalist activists for the BNP involved in a libel case against a well known Communist election candidate and Communist supporter - this being the convicted liar and thief Gerry Gable of the Searchlight magazine. Instead of withdrawing from the case the Judge, and the other two judges on the bench hearing the appeal, found against the BNP members and at the same time ‘clarified‘ the position of the libel laws in the UK to ensure that the Roberts brothers and others in the future did not come under its protection. The Roberts Brothers were not told of the Judges political affiliations. This is the same Judge who said that too many black males had their DNA held on the Police computers and that therefore everyone in Britain should be required to provide a sample of their DNA to the police to hold on their computers. The role of Judges in the modern legal system is to repress and remove the rights of the ethnic majority and create a ’legal’ apartheid state where we, the indigenous British, are legally recognised as a racial underclass in our own country. Other judges, such as Sir Henry Hodge the husband of Margaret Hodge the Dagenham MP and vociferous critic of the BNP, who is jointly responsible for allowing the convicted immigrant murder Learco Chindamo to stay in the country after he is released from prison, place the interests of immigrant killers before the safety of society as a whole. Other judges blocked the Home Offices’ attempt to appeal the decision not to deport Chindamo after his release.