Liberal Fascists Piss on Free Speech Again

IMAGE - NUS students and supporters of NO PLATFORM FOR THE BNP.

Fucking arsehole idiot monkeys.





One of the ironies of Liberal Fascism is that it tolerates Islamic radicals demanding the death of British troops in our streets, it supports the right of Irish Republican terrorist groups to have a right to talk in the media (remember the howls of rage when Thatcher banned Gerry Adams and SinnFein from talking on the TV amd media), it supports semi-naked men pnnacing down the streets in bondage gear in front of children whilst fondling snakes with their arses exposed in Gay Pride marches, it allows anti-Christians to have stage plays like the Jerry Springer show that mocks christianity, it supports the right of Tamil Tiger terrorists to block London streets and demand their terrorist chums back home persist in their terrorist campaigns, it supports the rught of black rap artists to call for whitey to be killed, it supports the right for us to go into a village newsagent and be confronted with magazines like 'Barely Legal - 16 and a babe' on the top shelf, it supports the right of people to demand the abortion of babies and it supports the right of anti-fascist to march through the streets or on the BBC demanding BNP members are killed.

But oh fucking no, the limit to free speech is reached when the BNP, a legal political party, is allowed to print totally legal adverts for the party in local newspapers.

Type in a news feed BNP and see how many of the liberal fascist cock ends of this country have demanded that nespapers ban the BNP from having free speech.

Even the NUJ, a collection of mottley ex-communists kept on life support by the subs of their idiot membership, have demanded an end to free speech.

These complete fucking idiots cannot see that this is what this fascist government wants.

The NO PLATFORM policy imposed on universities by the sanctimonious prick army of Tarquins and Tamsins in the NUS allows the government to ignore the demands of millions of people such as the Anti-Iraq War marches a few years ago.

The rot of free speech is like a creeping wet rot, it begins in the universities with the No Platform policy supported by deluded fuck wit students incited into action by the corrupt academic shite that infest the university system and the NUS, and then it creeps all the way up into government.

If you tolerate no platform in the universities, it then becomes acceptable in the governments.

Free speech is free speech.

The idea that free speech should be hostage to the demands of these packs of demented idiots that seek to wear a moral mask as they rape our liberty and right to free speech, is unnaceptable.

THE NUS, THE NUJ AND ALL THOSE SANCTIMONIOUS STUDENT WANKERS THAT DEMAND RESTRICTIONS OF FREE SPEECH ARE THE RAPISTS OF LIBERTY.

The new book burners of the left and liberals replace the communist and nazi book burners.

Now they censor books, ideas and opinions, just as the old tyrants did.

Today universities are merely concentration camps for the blissfully ignorant.

They love their slavery to stupidity.

They seek the satisfaction of ignorance as to be ignorant is far easier than to wrestle with intelligence and the free flow of ideas.

Only the stupid, the ignorant and the criminal support restrictions on free speech.

The ugly little people huddle together and seek to moralise their ugliness and define it as something beautiful.

Universities are now merely maggot farms churning out repulsive liberal maggots whose values are merely reflections of their own ignorance.

Those that are not taught to think for themselves, remain as slaves forever.

That is why you are taught to be slaves.

You surrender your liberty like a whore surrenders her dignity.

Today the slaves yearn for their slavery, they seek the morality of the herd as they stampede into their lecture theatres and seek validation from the braying donkeys that teach them.

Free speech must not be surrendered to these ciphers, these empty creatures of liberalism that have never achieved the status of a human being.

A human being is one who thinks for themself, one who is willing to hear all sides and ideas and then choose for himself or herself what they believe.

Today we have no human beings any more, we have conditioned monkeys that chatter amongst themselves with simian grunts and who call that the pseudo-language, the language of democracy.

You are all so fucking stupid, you dont even realise just how fucking stupid you really are.

Britain is now a Monkey World for fucking idiot monkeys.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2009/may/20/newsquest-nationalunionofjournalists

Kill The Kuffars Say Muslim NUS Members

One of the things that makes me laugh about Liberals is how they ignore reality for dogma, such as when they say ' it is poverty, racism and social alienation that is driving vulnerable young muslims into terrorism'.

This of course is utter BS.

1) Most of the Muslims involved in terrorism are middle class and well educated

2) Islam is a religion and not a race, therefore no such as thing as 'racism' against Muslims can exist

3) Social alienation is not what the Muslims have suffered in our country, it is how they have chosen to live in our country. Self Segregation is how Muslims have chosen to live under the Multi-Cultural system and they have been allowed to become colonists in their own colonies in our country.

The 7/7 bombers were all well educated, university degree, middle class scumbags in good jobs. The main 7/7 bomb leader, Siddique Khan was a teacher and the funding for the bombs came courtesy of Leeds Council who had given him a grant to set up a gym for muslim youths.

Instead he spent the grant from the council on building bombs.

The 7/7 bombings were subsidised by the cringing idiot liberals on Leeds Council.

Incredible.

It appears that in fact the best educated, most intelligent and well off muslims are now becoming the Islamists.

The recent doctors plot around the Glasgow car bombing where the bombers were muslim doctors shows us that it is not only the criminal muslims who reside in our streets and act as drug dealers and gangsters we have to worry about, it is also the intellectual Muslims who have become Islamists and who mainly perpetrate the Islamist bombings.


The article below reveals just how this new middle class, edu\cated elite despise us, our nation and our values as a culture and a civilisation.

It shows us that 3rd and 4th generation Muslim youth have not integrated into our country - so what makes the government think they ever will, especially when the contempt a massive majority has for this country will ensure more self segregation, more hate for the 'kuffars' and more terrorism ?


For a true taste of their hate for us watch this video here ;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_Kuffar




http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1038953/One-British-Muslim-students-say-acceptable-kill-Islam.html

One third of British Muslim students say it's acceptable to kill for Islam

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 9:13 AM on 28th July 2008


Comments (44) Add to My Stories



Nearly one third of Muslim students believe it can be acceptable to kill in the name of religion, according to a survey published yesterday.


It also found that 40 per cent want to see the introduction of Islamic sharia law in Britain, 40 per cent think it wrong for Muslim men and women to mix freely together, and 33 per cent want to see a worldwide Islamic government based on sharia law.


The findings were described by researchers at the Centre for Social Cohesion think tank, which commissioned the poll, as 'deeply alarming'.


But a prominent Muslim student group called the report 'weak and unrepresentative' and said it undermined 'positive work carried out by Islamic societies'.


The Centre for Social Cohesion, founded last year to study religion and tolerance, has drawn attention to the extremist influence of Islamic societies and study centres at British universities.

The survey was based on a YouGov poll of 1,400 students, 600 of them Muslims, at 12 universities with influential Islamic societies.


These included eight in London, among them the London School of Economics, Imperial College, and the School of Oriental and African Studies, and the universities of Birmingham, Leeds, Leicester and Manchester.


It found that a large minority of Muslim students express views that are strongly socially conservative or which suggest they are open to extremist thinking.



More...
Spanish police foil ETA plot to bomb holiday resorts

While 32 per cent justified killing in the name of religion if the religion was under attack, 60 per cent of students active in Islamic societies did so. Four per cent thought killing to promote religion was permissible.


More than half, 54 per cent, wanted an Islamic political party to stand up for Muslims at Westminster.


There was strong criticism of the British Government over Iraq - 66 per cent of Muslim students said they had lost respect for it.


But 30 per cent of Muslim students said their respect for British society had grown because of the negative public reaction to the Iraq war.


Report author Hannah Stuart said: 'These findings are deeply alarming. Students in higher education are the future leaders of their communities, yet significant numbers of them appear to hold beliefs which contravene liberal, democratic values.


'These results are deeply embarrassing for those who have said that there is no extremism in British universities.'


Miss Stewart also said that ministers should be wary about treating university Islamic societies as representative because their members appeared to be more extreme than other Muslim students.


The Federation of Student Islamic Societies called the survey mischievous.


Its president Faisal Hanjra said: 'This is yet another damning attack on the Muslim community by elements within the academic arena whose only purpose seems to be the undermining of sincere efforts by mainstream Muslim organisations to tackle the threat of terror which wider society faces.


'The report is methodologically weak, it is unrepresentative and above all serves only to undermine the positive work carried out by Islamic societies across the country.'


Concerns over extremism among the 90,000 Muslims studying at British universities have grown alongside the spread of radical groups, including the Hizb ut-Tahrir organisation which Tony Blair said in 2005 should be banned.


Terrorists who have passed through British universities include Kafeel Ahmed, who died after driving a burning vehicle into a Glasgow airport terminal last year, and Jawad Akbar, jailed for life in April 2007 for conspiring to attack shopping malls and nightclubs. He was said to have become involved in militancy while a student at Brunel University.

The NUS, Anti-Semitism and the SWP

Interesting story from todays Jewish Chronicle ;

Note that the BNP is not mentioned either by the students, the Jewish Chronicle or the Rabbi.

It is the SWP and the Far Left that are the real anti-semites, who peddle negative stereotypes and propaganda about Jews on campus.

Such negative stereotypes have to be resisted, just as negative stereotypes about our community perpetuated by Hollywood have to be resisted.



http://www.thejc.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m11&SecId=11&AId=60910&ATypeId=1


Student leaders pledge to fight campus racism

27/06/2008

By Jonathan Kalmus

Manchester University’s growing reputation for harbouring antisemitism is facing a new challenge after Jewish candidates gained a third of the places on the student-union council.

After the elections, Mr Pinfold was unequivocal about kicking out antisemitism: “For too long, Jewish students have seen their concerns swept away and ignored by the students’ union, their representative body,” he said.

A note of caution came from student chaplain Rabbi Y Y Rubinstein, who said: “The new executive is only there for a year. Anybody who thinks that they can deflect the issue is remarkably naïve and ignorant of student politics in the UK over the past 20 years.

“The agenda on the far left is anti-Israel and antisemitism. Groups like the Socialist Workers’ Party and their fellow travellers continue to fester on campuses, pushing one issue to the fore of student life and short-changing the vast majority of genuine student causes.”

No Platform and the NUS Idiots

There are few things more pathetic than a university that restricts free speech for the BNP, but that supports the principle of freedom of speech.

I went to Kent University and studied law and saw for myself just how pathetic the far left and liberals are on the issue of free speech.

Whilst every che guevara worshipping chinless wonder is allowed to spread their nonsense on campus, the one point of view that is surpressed is nationalism.

Paedophiles are more popular on most campus's in the country than nationalists, and this is simply due to the fact that the kids that go to university are brainwashed by the left as soon as they enter the places.

The NUS, the academics and the staff all push on the kids leftism in all its forms, from liberalism to communism.

Whilst I was working in the Law Clinic at Kent University the National Front held a demonstration at Margate at which about 25 of their members attended. The university rent a mob lefty idiots organised a counter demo and with their self aggrandising nonsense depicted themselves as the socialists heroes and heirs of Stalingrad for standing in the street for an hour shouting 'Nazi scum off our streets'.

The fact that most of the idiots on the demo were a bunch of henriettas and jeremys from posh middle class areas of the country and did not even live in Margate and also all of them supported the NUS policy on No Platform for the BNP or NF, made their claim for ownership of Margate and their defence of liberty a total joke.

The problem with the liberals and left though is that they lack any sense of self irony, they are hypocrites who are too stupid to stand back and realise just how stupid they are. Therefore they keep on being stupid.

I wrote in the student magazine that as a defender of free speech, it was worse to censor the NF than allow them to speak. That censorhip is the true tyranny, not the presence of 25 people on the streets of margate for an hour.

You can imagine the howls of protest by the idiots.

Suddenly I was as popular as Chris Rock at a Ku Klux Klan meeting.

I was booed when I went into my lectures and the already icy shoulder (middle class snobs dont like working class people) suddenly became a shoulder drenched in liquid nitrogen.

The article below seeks to bring down the No Platform policy and replace it with a One Debate Policy, that of equating the BNP with only one issue that being race. We are to be allowed to debate, but only if we debate race as the left reckon they might be able to win that debate.

Yeah right.

Apparently the vision of free speech that even these academics want to see is a free speech engineered to produce a result they like, in other words we must be allowed to debate race as the LIBERALS AND LEFT reckon they can defeat us on that issue.

Yet again it just reveals how crass these people are.

Free speech is cool, but only if they can win the argument.

Well lets at least see if they have the balls to put their debating rooms where their mouths are.

I was once invited to speak at a conference on Marixsm at Kent University by my old proffessor John Fitzpatrick (NOW AN OBE !)

But of course it was withdrawn as the lefties attending the conference said either I was withdrawn or they would withdraw.

The middle class marxist insipids could not debate with me in case the whole democratic system collapsed.

Or was it simply that like all bullies they like to talk a good fight, but when it comes to it just do not have the brains or balls for a fair fight.

The NUS is an absurd organisation, a sad and pitiful joke, run by idiots for idiots.

You dont get educated in universities these days, you just get to become as stupid as the people who teach you.






Against The Grain: 'I'd invite the BNP to a debate'

Interview by Chris Green
Thursday, 19 June 2008


Dennis Hayes is a visiting professor at the Westminster Institute of Education at Oxford Brookes University. He argues that academics should have the freedom to put forward controversial and unpopular opinions with impunity, no matter how offensive they might be.


Every week there seems to be a new attack on academic freedom, and yet academics aren't defending it, because they don't see what's happening. Many institutions' statements on academic freedom have so many caveats that they cease to be about freedom at all, and the University and College Union has an entirely contradictory view of it: it supports the academic freedom of the left-wing academics it agrees with, while condemning the right-wing ones it disagrees with. But university should be a place where you can challenge every bit of perceived wisdom.

Freedom of speech is under attack throughout society, and the academy should be ensuring that every viewpoint can be heard and challenged, but it's not doing that. Everybody in academia should be able to say what they like, otherwise we're not universities any more, we're just training institutions to school people in the "right" views.

I'm not arguing that academics should go around being gratuitously abusive or insulting people's grandmothers, but freedom of speech is shut down when people are afraid to say anything that might be seen as offensive. Last year, Staffordshire University decided that there would be no political debate during freshers' week, arguing that the new students should be being welcomed rather than being forced to engage in a heated debate. When I went to university, we took it as normal that every lesson you went to would turn your views upside down: now, nobody's views are ever challenged.

Academics should stop self-censoring and be brave enough to accept the right to hold extreme views. It's their responsibility to say whatever they think is true, but they shirk this by blaming anybody but themselves for restricting the freedom to speak: the education system, the government, even the law. And if they're not prepared to challenge their students' views, then the students are getting a raw deal out of university, and so are they: people will start thinking of university as a place to be intellectually safe.

People ask me if I would let the BNP in on a debate, and I say, "Of course I would." It's not because I'm a racist or I like the BNP, it's because you have to respect people's ability to make up their own minds about an issue.

Racist ideas are not stunningly intellectual, and the majority of 18-year-olds would be able to challenge them successfully without any trouble whatsoever. But if you are to defeat these arguments, you at least have to hear them.

Dennis Hayes is the founder of Academics for Academic Freedom, which university lecturers and researchers can sign up to at www.afaf.org.uk.