Showing posts with label The Times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Times. Show all posts

Thursday, 7 April 2011

Muslim Gang Rape And Murder In Blackpool




Image - Charlene Downes, groomed , raped and murdered by Muslim rape gang and then her body was minced and put into the kebabs sold in the kebab shop owned by the rape gang.






Image - Paige Chivers, victim of Muslim rape gang in Blackpool and missing suspected murdered same as Charlene Downes.



The Times today has a devastating expose of the extent of muslim rape gangs operating in Blackpool linked with murders and rapes of white schoolgirls.

ELEVEN of the muslim owned takeaway shops in Blackpool are running rape gangs.

And the police hid all this from the parents of local white children in order to ensure 'community cohesion'.

White children are raped - the police remain silence.

Muslims are racially abused - the police launch public awareness campaigns.

It is time the EDL staged a demonstration in Blackpool.

It is also time that these takeaway shops were closed down - and if the police and council do not do it, then local people must.

SELF DEFENCE IS NO OFFENCE.

Local people must organise small cells of trusted activists and target these premises for direct actions.

These actions must continue until those premises are shut down - as the police are as complict in the rapes as the rapists as they refused and still refuse to release that information to the public to protect themselves.

The police are now the enemy of our own community - they are agents of the rapists and assist in their crimes by hiding that information from the public.

The police by refusing to identify those premises to the public that are linked to organised rapes and grooming of white children are in fact causing racism in communities, as innocent muslims will get caught up in the fall out when this all erupts on the streets sooner or later.

Therefore in order to protect innocent Muslims, the guilty ones must be named.

The white community must begin a campaign of civil disobedience and protests to highlight this issue and to get the police and politicians to start to deal with, and not brush it under the politically correct carpet.

If any police officer in Blackpool has a moral conscience and wants to protect both our community and innocent Muslims - then they must release the names of the fast food shops involved in the rape and grooming.

If the police refuse to release that information - then innocent people will suffer as a result.

It is time for the white community to rise up.

Only when the system realises that we are not afraid to resist the rapists and their police collaborators - only then will the system act to stop the rapists.

In America the black community had a slogan they used to chant when they fought racism ;

NO JUSTICE - NO PEACE

That is the slogan we must now adopt as the cry of a new movement to protect our community from the rapist animals in our country being protected by the police and politicins.

The time has come for us to form local militias of militant patriots dedicated to confronting the rape gangs in our communities.

White, black, Hindu, Jewish, Sikh and moderate Muslim - we are all at risk from these rapist scum.

This is why a new movement must arise that unites us all to target the threat to us all.

The white community have betrayed their own children, as they have acted only as gutless cowards who have sat back whilst these rape gangs have grown and proliferated in their communities and across the country.

The fear of being called 'racist' has turned the White British people into cringing, gutless cowards who will not act to protect their own children from these criminals.

Sooner or later these rape gangs will start to target other communities not just the white community, and therefore we are all at risk - white, black, Hindu, Sikh and Jew and moderate integrated Muslims who do not dress their children in burkhas.

All our children will become their prey.

The failure of the White community to resist the rape gangs has opened the door to the rape gangs targeting vulnerable ethnic minority communities across our country.

A few march pasts of hundreds of balaclava clad activists past these rows of shops would send a strong message to the rapists, the police and the councils.

If we do not resist the rape gangs they will continue to target our community.

Only when they fear us will they stop.

The organised rape of children is one of the greatest crimes against humanity possible, second only to genocide.

The fact that this crime against humanity is endemic in our nation means we must rise and resist it.

RESIST NOW !



http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.com/2011/04/paki-alley.html

Wednesday, 6 April 2011Paki Alley

From the Times today:


Charlene Downes and her friends called it “Paki Alley”. When they were hungry, wanted cigarettes or alcohol, or needed top-up credit for their mobile phones, they knew where to go because you could find almost anything down the alleyway. For a price.

What Lancashire Constabulary uncovered when Charlene went missing from home in 2003, however, was almost a factory production line of child abuse involving the systematic grooming and sexual exploitation of dozens of young girls by a closely linked group of men.

The force’s initial “problem scan” identified more than 60 local girls, the youngest aged 11 but most aged from 13 to 15, as being “exposed and vulnerable” to men operating from a cluster of “honey-pot” locations in the town centre, all takeaway food premises.


The ironically named Awaken:


Children, many from troubled homes or in the care system, had been befriended by older men who flattered their desire to be treated as adults, showering them with gifts and affection before using them for sex both inside and outside the takeaway outlets.

The scale of the criminality was so disturbing that one of Britain’s first multi-agency child sexual exploitation projects, Awaken, was swiftly established in Blackpool to target offenders and offer support to vulnerable girls.


Ooh, but we can't tell the truth about it!


A decision seems to have been taken at an early stage that one aspect of the abuse made the police findings too sensitive to be revealed publicly. In 2007, an unpublished report by police and local authority representatives from Awaken stated: “Analysis showed that in relation to the takeaways, non-white adult males working alone or within friendship groups were principally perpetrating the exploitation.”

A former senior Lancashire police officer cites “concerns about upsetting community cohesion” to explain the long-standing reluctance to acknowledge publicly what was a very specific offender profile in a town where 96 per cent of the population were white.


This line is prominent in almost every story about the Muslim rape gangs:


Most child-sex offenders in Britain are white males, usually acting alone.


Why do they constantly emphasise this? The population is still 90% white. It's hardly surprising that the majority of sex offenders are white. When it comes to group rape, however, the perpetrators are overwhelmingly members of ethnic minorities:


A totally different picture emerged from cases where there were multiple defendants preying on girls aged from 12 to 15, whom they met in town centres, on street corners, inside shopping malls, outside school gates or at bus and rail stations.

In 17 such court cases since 1997, 16 of them from towns or cities in Yorkshire or Lancashire, a total of 56 men have been convicted of crimes including child abduction, indecent assault and rape. Of those 56, 50 were Muslims and most were men of Pakistani heritage.

Across other areas of northern England and the Midlands, groups of Iraqi Kurds and refugees from Afghanistan have been identified by childcare specialists as perpetrators of similar collective sexual exploitation.

In Blackpool, many of the owners and workers in 11 “honey-pot” food premises identified by police were of Middle Eastern origin.

Charlene knew several of them. Her sad story was of a child whose home life was so chaotic that the night-time streets, no matter how dangerous, held the promise of escape, excitement and companionship.


The Times spoke with a girl who knew Charlene:


A young woman who knew Charlene, and whose identity The Times has agreed to protect, was 13 when she first came into contact with several of Blackpool’s takeaway workers. She has not forgotten the initial allure.

“They were older than you and you thought they were your friends. It all seemed so glamorous and exciting and young girls were drawn into it: the flash cars, the money, the alcohol, free food, sometimes drugs.”

She named two men in particular. Both are still closely linked to separate food outlets in the town. One “was married with kids, had a really young English girlfriend on the side but still chased after other young girls.

“He was a filthy old man. He used to offer me drugs because he said they would loosen me up. He made my flesh crawl.”

The other man “would say some awful things about white girls” yet was happy to proposition “literally every pretty young girl who’d hit puberty that came into his shop.
“He had no respect for us, the way we dressed, the way we drank, how forward we were. It was as though white girls were asking for it. He’d say that all English girls were slags, unlike Muslim women who wore the hijab and walked five steps behind their husband.”











Add to Technorati Favorites

Saturday, 14 November 2009

The Real Enemy of The Working Class is not Immigration

Simon Heffer is usually a good writer.

On this issue is he is talking bollocks.

My comments in italics.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/simonheffer/6564220/The-real-enemy-of-the-working-classes-is-not-immigration.html




The real enemy of the working classes is not immigration

Labour's lax immigration policies have not served Britain well, writes Simon Heffer, but the welfare state has been more damaging.


By Simon Heffer
Published: 7:00PM GMT 13 Nov 2009

Comments 50 | Comment on this article

Recently, a Labour adviser was found to have backed unlimited immigration because it would "rub the noses" of the Right in diversity. This ignored the fact that members of the public – whatever their ethnic origins – have a right to expect government to be honest about the composition of their country and its culture. No one's nose should be "rubbed in" diversity until he or she has been consulted.

Gordon Brown's tacit admission on Thursday that lax immigration policies had not served Britain well was long overdue. This is not, as the Left well knows, a race issue. It is about whether our country, and especially the south-east of England, can physically cope with a rapidly expanding population. It is also about whether our economy needs unskilled workers from anywhere, when we have so many of our own who are idle. This brings us on to the main point about why Mr Brown said what he did: his party's fear of the BNP.

Whatever claims the BNP makes about its reach, it remains predominantly a party of the white working classes. It does not merely play to their anger over lack of opportunities, or over what they feel are the favours done by the Government to immigrants; it feeds them. Labour knows that, in the North especially, it may shed so many votes to the BNP that it loses seats to the Lib Dems or the Tories.

( correct here simon. When UKIP elect Lord Pearson, another Tory Toff, to replace Farage the Spiv who was repulsive to the Tory voters who UKIP now hope to capture, then we can expect to see a Lib-Lab Coalition government or a weak Tory government with a tiny minority at the next general election. )


However, Mr Brown is not being entirely honest either when he uses this no-longer-taboo subject to show the white working classes that he cares about them. Even if non-EU immigration were stopped tomorrow, and even if the countless thousands of illegal immigrants working here were at last deported by a Government that is remarkably loath to do so, what difference would it make for the white working classes?

( A vast difference - no more competition for jobs, no more downwards wage pressures, the return of Kin Based communities where local families can get council housing next to each other in their own communities and no longer rely on the welfare state to take care of them and their extended families. The primary driver for the destruction of the white working class was the destruction of white working class communities and the break up of extended kin based family communities - and immigration has increased this by taking up council housing. Families that live together take care of each other, and the welfare state doesnt have too )


To the decent majority who live respectably and are in work, probably none at all; and to the feckless minority whose benefit-fuelled existences have stripped them of all sense of responsibility, and whose dismal state education never remotely prepared them for one, none at all either.

( Here we go - yet again Heffer unleashes his facile and asinine stereotypes of class loathing. Pompous prick. The idea that those in work are the epitome of virtue is pathetic. Middle class junkies, drunks, and blue collar crime is rife. The one third of MP's who ripped the tax payer off were working. Why doesnt he attack the idle rich who are even more idle than the people on the dole he despises, those Tory Toffs like James Bethel and Zac Goldsmith who did fuck all for their wealth except find the egg after being ejaculated. The idle rich and their wealth are the primary parasites in our society, sucking up money that could be used to assist the poor and disabled )

The problem of the white working classes is only very marginally to do with immigrants. It starts with their parents, who lacked ambition, mired as they already were in the swamp of the welfare state.


( what a wanker. The idea the white working class is static is idiotic. The white middle class of today who worked their way into the middle class after the war and during Thatcherism will see their children sink back into the working class under political correctness, affirmative action and positive discrimination)

It grew worse with their schools, which (not least because of the lack of co-operation from their parents, but also because of the Marxist twaddle that dominates our low-achieving comprehensive school system) ended up being little more than ineffectual child-minding services. It then became terminal, with the welfare state kicking in on their behalves, as it did on their parents', removing from them incentive to work or to have any ambition.


( what a wanker. Millions escaped the white working and became middle class after the war because jobs existed and opportunities existed. They rose IN SPITE of their liberal left wing crap teaching. They rose because there were jobs they could take that paid well - and that was because the jobs existed and the population numbers meant that they could demand decent wages for those jobs. Immigration meant wages were cut at the same time as house prices rose and social housing was cut. This meant that they could not get jobs that paid their bill and were therefore forced to stay on welfare simply to survive. If your wages dont cover your outgoings like mortgage, rent, council tax, electric, water rates etc etc , then that is a not good incentive for going to work is it heffer you mug)

It is all very well to say that immigrants come here and take the low-paid jobs these people would do. But are we sure they are fit to do them? Are they sufficiently motivated? Do they bring the right work ethic? Are they willing to be responsible for their own lives? Are they able to be responsible for their own lives? I doubt it.


( THE ISSUE IS DOES THE PAY COVER THEIR OUTGOINGS YOU PRICK - if the wages you are paid do not cover your outgoings then why work ????? Deport millions of illegal immigrants, wages will rise and people will take those jobs )


Dave talked earlier this week about reducing the scope of the welfare state and, if he has the courage to follow through on his ideas, that would certainly provide some of the incentive needed for the white working classes to get off their collective bottom. But this has to be complemented by reversing Labour's failures in schools, and by in some way imposing on families the duty to bring up their children properly. With the right act of will, this is possible. It means taking the state out of people's lives quite dramatically. What will serve no purpose at all is blaming immigrants.



( What about the middle class raising their kids properly - those coke heads, piss heads, credit junkies and drunk drivers. What about the rich junkies and tory toffs. The schools need nationalising and the liberal leftist rubbish taught in them removed. The state needs to be NATIONALISED not turned into a wing of Oxfam. Blaming immigrants is blaming the true problem - a pity that Heffer is too stupid to see this )


The real Problem IS IMMIGRATION and also the fact that the Tories under Thatcher destroyed the BRITISH STATE and replaced it with the corporate state - we dont need the state to be cut back anymore and turned into Oxfam, we need the state NATIONALISED, the economy nationalised, society nationalised and the people nationalised.












































Add to Technorati Favorites

Thursday, 28 May 2009

Daily Mail, The Times, Searchlight Lies Caught Out






Yet again the Corporate Media have been caught out telling lies to the public about the BNP.

The Daily Mail, The Times and Searchlight have all stated that the Electoral Commission have begun an 'investigation' or an 'inquiry' into the allegations made by themselves about a five thousand pound donation to Nick Griffin passed to the Solidarity trades union.

I rang the Electoral Commission and they have confirmed that there is no investigation, there is no inquiry and that they are not planning any investigation.

The role of the Electoral Commission is to investigate donations passed too a political party, not donations made to a private individual when then passed at donation to a trades union.

The Electoral Commission have no power in law to investigate anything other than what they are empowered under legislation to investigate.

Ring them up for yourself on 02072710500 and they will confirm that the media are making up complete bullshit.

This is simply another lie in the long list of lies told by a desperate Corporate Media who are trying to force the failed political pigs of the Tories, Lib Dems, Labour and UKIP onto the British public in the forthcoming European Elections.

Yet again the main tabloids have listened to Searchlight's lies and then printed them on their pages.

What a bunch of total idiots.


























Add to Technorati Favorites

The Times and the Reds




Image - Rupert Murdoch crying into his champagne that latest BNP smear attempt failed.




HO HO HO - screw you Rupert Murdoch and screw The Times.

Not only did Nick Griffon suss you out, he used the money you tried to illegally donate to the BNP to support Solidarity legal cases to support persecuted nationalists.

Then, to cap it all, you go and give the BNP a front page story whilst the BNP website runs the facts and kills the story.

Brilliant. Thanks you grubby twats.

P.S. I just love the confirmation the entire corporatocracy and the corporate media despise the BNP.

Note the fact that the ONLY political party the entire Establishment are against are the BNP.

Proof indeed that we are the only real opposition party in the UK.

Hi Ho Hi Ho Its Off To Brussels We Go !

P.S Heres some info on Tony Blair and Rupert Murdoch.

The question is why does this American who is not even British have so much power over the media in the UK ?

The first thing we will do is ensure that media groups in the UK can only be owned by British citizens, as that way they can be held liable for the lies they print in their papers.

Note that Murdoch was informed by Blair about the Iraq War before it began, and before Parliament or the British people, so that Murdochs papers The Sun and Times could print lies in its pages to support Blairs plans for war.

It was The Sun and The Times that printed and propagandised the dodgy dossier with its bullshit about WMD and it was the corporate media that beat the drum for the Iraq War.

The Corporate Media are as guilty as the politicians that voted for the Iraq War for the war crimes committed during the Iraq War.

Murdoch knew even before the British soldiers who would be sent to die in Iraq, the British Parliament and the British people.

That is not a democracy, that is a conspiracy.

WE DEMAND A PUBLIC INQUIRY INTO THE ROLE OF THE MEDIA IN PROPAGANDISING AND SUPPORTING THE IRAQ WAR AND ALSO THE ROLE OF MURDOCH AND BLAIR IN PREPARING THE MEDIA FOR THE WAR.


Rupert Murdoch

Tony Blair's close relationship with Rupert Murdoch, and the reciprocated unprecedented support which he received from Murdoch's globally influential News Corporation media empire, has been the subject of much criticism.[89][90] In 1995 while leader of the Opposition, Blair disclosed in Commons register of interests that he was a guest of Murdoch when he flew to meet him in Hayman Island.[91]


Contacts with UK media proprietors

A Cabinet Office freedom of information response, released the day after Blair handed over power to Gordon Brown, documents Blair having various official phone calls and meetings with Rupert Murdoch of News Corporation and Richard Desmond of Northern and Shell Media.[92]

The response includes contacts "clearly of an official nature" in the specified period, but excludes contacts "not clearly of an official nature."[93] No details were given of what subjects discussed. In the period between September 2002 and April 2005, Blair and Murdoch are documented speaking 6 times; three times in the 9 days before the Iraq war, including the eve of the 20 March US and UK invasion, and on 29 January, 25 April and 3 October 2004. Between January 2003 and February 2004, Mr Blair had three meetings with Richard Desmond; on 29 January and 3 September 2003 and 23 February 2004.[94][95]

The information was disclosed after a three and a half year battle by the Lib Dem Lord Avebury.[92] Lord Avebury's initial October 2003 information request was dismissed by then leader of the Lords, Baroness Amos.[92] A following complaint was rejected, with Downing Street claiming the information compromised free and frank discussions, while Cabinet Office claimed releasing the timing of the PM's contacts with individuals is undesirable, as it might lead to the content of the discussions being disclosed.[92] While awaiting a following appeal from Lord Avebury, the cabinet office announced that it would release the information. Lord Avebury said: "The public can now scrutinise the timing of his (Murdoch's) contacts with the former Prime Minister, to see whether they can be linked to events in the outside world."[92]



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Blair#Rupert_Murdoch


























Add to Technorati Favorites

Sunday, 25 January 2009

Princess Michelle Obama

I have to admit, that to my shame, I used to read The Times.

I go on the Times website most days and take look and over the last few weeks all we have had on it is a bunch of docile women wittering on about Obama and his wife.

You can tell that The Times is now a paper for women, simply by reading the endless infintile articles about Obamas wifes shoes, dresses, earings, hats etc etc blah blah blah yawn !

Most sickening of all was that idiot Judy Finnegan and her husband Richard in The Express yesterday, displaying all the classic signs of their 'oh so earnest' liberal admiration of Obama and his wonderful, almost princess diana like wife.

Heres an article about Obama's wife that the British press wont tell you about, run as it is by idiots and journalists who are as dumb as their readers.

I wonder what the answer to the question in the article below is - usually it is because of theft or fraud.

So the first lady is either a crook or a fraudster - and yet the British press have never mentioned once why she was struck off as a lawyer.


http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd430.htm


“It is a terrible thing when you think you got on a bandwagon and it turns out to be a garbage truck." Ernst (Putzi) Hanfstaengl*

The circus out in Washington, DC., for the unlawful swearing in of the impostor president, Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro and so forth, is now over. All the gushing and slobbering over the trashy looking rag worn by the militant Michelle Obama, has faded into the night. I wonder how many of the mindless mouth pieces giving their commentary about the "wonderful, smart First Lady," know that in 1993, Michelle Obama, was ordered by the Illinois Supreme Court to stop practicing law? The faux First Lady was ordered by the court; it was not her choice.

The records are sealed by the court so we don't know why, but I am told by lawyers sending me email, it had to be something major for such drastic action.





Add to Technorati Favorites

Tuesday, 30 September 2008

Pompous Reactionaries Attack Austria















Image - the men who will save Austria and sweep all the crap from their country, from the communist scum to the conservative traitors and the immigrant parasites.





The three articles below are all written by the reactionary conservative supporting media scum of the British newspapers.

Note how they all say the exact same thing - nazi, hitler, blah blah blah.

These are the same newspapers that once supported Hitler before the second world war or who worked as propaganda mechanisms to incite and start the second world war as they worked for Milner Group ( my articles here about the Milner Group and their control and use of The Times newspaper to control democracy by 'seeding public opinion' through the promotion of ideas and political parties by the newspapers they control ) -

1) http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2008/06/milner-group-balfour-declaration-and.html

2) http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2007_09_01_archive.html


The fact is that the media are mechanisms of social control, they do not print the truth they merely print the bullshit required to get the lemming like masses to vote for the political parties they control.

The media are pimps and the political parties their whores.

They attack the Nationalists in Austria as they want to keep the present corrupr political conservative and communist cabals in power.

An academic that writes for the Daily Mail attacking nationalists is merely another reactionary whore working for the system.






http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1064517/As-nearly-30-Austrian-voters-extremists--The-far-Right-chilling-wake-Europe.html

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article4849164.ece

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article4849164.ece






Add to Technorati Favorites