Great Article from Spiked.

The Tories stand atop a pile of mouldering bones of Boer Concentration Camp victims whose trail leads to Auschwitz, and yet points at the BNP and screams 'racist'.

New Labour pontificates about multi-culturalism and diversity and screams 'racists' at the BNP whilst it was New Labour who last year went to the House of Lords in order to prevent the indigenous Diego Garcian peoples returning home after they were ethnically cleansed from their own lands by both Labour and Tory governments.

Kicking the BNP is just the media's way to divert peoples attentions from the pig politicians of the mainstream political parties - who are owned by the corporatocracy and the Corporate Media.

We do not have Free Press we have a Corporate Media.

Never make the mistake of confusing the former with the latter.

That way tyranny lies.








http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/6750/

Mick Hume

When all else fails, bash the BNP

In its phoney moral crusade to stop the British National Party, the elite has replaced politics with emotional blackmail.


Sometimes it seems that if the British National Party (BNP) did not exist, the political class might have to invent it.

Reactions to the expenses scandal have exposed mainstream politics at its lowest ebb. A New Labour government many thought had already reached rock bottom has got out its pickaxe and started digging down through the rock to unexplored depths. Yet the ‘new’ Conservative opposition is also in turmoil, standing embarrassed before the media ‘moats and all’. Self-flagellation is the political style du jour, as a New Labour cabinet minister endorses electoral reforms that would stop his party getting into government again while Conservative leader David Cameron assures us that we no longer need be a Tory or even interested in politics to stand as an MP for his party.

Faced with the growing cult of the ‘independent’ MP, spineless professional politicians can now be cowed by the spectre of the ridiculous Esther Rantzen considering standing against them, while the cry from the media goes up to make Patsy from Absolutely Fabulous prime minister by popular acclaim.

In these dark days, what is the one thing that politicians can try to use as a crutch to help them hobble upwards, if not exactly on to the moral high ground, then at least from the drain to the gutter? Bring on the BNP! By warning that the political crisis could lead to the rise of this small far-right party in the coming European and local elections, and calling on virtuous voters to support democracy against the ‘threat’ of neo-fascism, they hope to make themselves appear decent by comparison. It looks like the political equivalent of the morality of the jailhouse, which distinguishes between ordinary decent criminals and sex offenders: ‘However bad you might think we are, at least we are not like them.’

So the major British parties have reportedly held top-level meetings to discuss a joint strategy to combat the BNP, including an ‘early warning system’ to pick up possible advances. Former New Labour cabinet minister David Blunkett has publicly warned of the dangers, while the Gordon Brown-supporting Daily Mirror has launched a ‘Hope Not Hate’ anti-BNP campaign.

The allies of the political class in the Church of England have rallied to the cause, proving that when it matters they remain pillars of the political establishment: the Archbishops of Canterbury and York issued a public declaration that it would be ‘tragic’ if public anger with the major parties led them to commit the sin of voting BNP. And liberal pundits who are normally fierce critics of the church dabbling in politics have defended the archbishops’ moral right to speak out on the apparently pressing theological issue of the BNP’s attempt to get elected on to the local council in Stoke-on-Trent.

Instead of political argument, it appears we now have an election campaign based on emotional blackmail: ‘Vote for us, or else the democrats – and the Gurkhas – will get it from the BNP!’ The choice we are supposed to be offered in a democracy is thus reduced to the moral imperative to vote for what they claim is Good against Evil. Unfortunately for the mainstream parties, many now find the notion that they are a force for good every bit as risible as the idea that the BNP is marching to power.


This circus reveals the underlying problem with politics today. It is not really about MPs’ expenses fiddles, entertaining yet unspectacular as they are. The view that politicians are only in it for themselves has taken such a hold partly because people can see no other reason for their existence, no great principles or causes that could motivate them to fight for political office. The anti-BNP stunt sums up the absence of any positive vision or leadership in politics today. There is a growing backlash against the system of political parties now. But the problem is not that we have parties, so much as they are not political. Hence, all we are offered by way of encouragement to vote is the unedifying spectacle of our alleged leaders cowering behind the archbishops’ robes in a fantasy crusade against the BNP bogeyman.

No doubt, as indicated at the start of this article, this is partly a cynical manoeuvre. (Some observers even claim Labour is cynical enough to want the BNP to do well in the June polls, as a distraction from its own plight.) But it also reflects the real fear of the electorate – and especially of white working-class voters – amongst the mainstream parties.

The idea that people could vote for the BNP is as much a symbol of the isolation and unpopularity of the political class as is the expenses row itself. Whatever appeal the BNP is able to make to voters has far less to do with its crankish policies and personalities than with its status as a receptacle for political (or anti-political) disaffection. Yet to New Labour and Conservative politicians and their media supporters, anybody who could consider voting BNP looks like a member of an alien race. The contempt and loathing for a large part of the electorate within the political-media class was well illustrated on last week’s BBC Question Time, when one liberal newspaper columnist said she might favour a General Election to sort out the crisis, but had decided to oppose it out of fear that people might vote for the BNP. In which case, why not abolish elections altogether? These people’s idea of democracy is revealed as the freedom to vote for parties and candidates approved by the elite.

The only real criticism of the anti-BNP blackmail campaign has been that talking up the ‘threat’ could backfire and lead more people to vote for them – itself a recognition of how little authority archbishops, MPs and columnists command today. The BNP will win some seats, but is highly unlikely to make a major national breakthrough next week. The only certain thing about elections held in a highly unstable anti-political climate is that there will be no winners among the electorate if the choices we are offered are between the BNP, the anti-BNP alliance and some fading celebrities.

A phoney moral crusade against the BNP looks like the last refuge of a discredited scoundrel today. Never mind ‘Stop the BNP’ – stop trying to blackmail us about it and start discussing politics. Few would even notice the far-right fragments today if we were engaged in a proper debate about the future of our society. The fact that the empty shells of our old political parties seem entirely incapable of starting such a debate suggests they are about as relevant to that future as the BNP.

Mick Hume is spiked‘s editor-at-large.

PC Police and the Paedophiles

There are over 30,000 sex offenders on the sex offenders register.

It is the job of the police to track what convicted paedophiles are doing when released.

But the police are now following MPPA guidance which cuts police visits to convicted High Risk paedophiles from 12 to 4 checks per year.

Yet at the same time as the police are cutting back visits to convicted paedophiles, the entire British police force are monitoring all its own officers and potential recuits for the crime of 'Being in the BNP'.

The entire value system of our nation has been overturned.

Now the hunt for politicial dissidents and free speech criminals takes greater precedence than monitoring the activities of convicted paedophiles on the loose in British society.

When the police surrendered to Political Correctness after The McPherson Report, then liberty died in England.

The ACPO Gestapo must be dismantled and replaced by a transparent and accountable public body, and not left as a Police Mafia run like Capone used to run the Chicago Mob.

Professor John Press and Culturism

Very interesting article below, but the professor has missed a few fundamental points ;

1) A people produce a culture. Change the nature of the people and the culture changes.

This is explictly recognised in Culturism as the demographic majority in any democracy have the right to defend the existing majority culture based on their status as the original group. They are also required to organise politically in order to protect their indigenous culture and therefore also have the right to demand society itself reflect their interests and culture as the majority group in the multi-cultural process.

Demography is the foundation of culture.



2) The BNP have never advocated ethnic cleansing.

Our agenda is based on democratic consensus, voluntary repatriation and only the forced removals of convicted criminals, terrorists and illegal entrants.

3) A culturist ideology will never be allowed to enter any mainstream Liberal Conservative party in Britain like the Tory Party.

Culturism will always be defined as racist by the left and liberals, therefore it will never be allowed to become part of any mainstream establishment political party of the reactionary right.


Therefore the only way the Culturist Meme will survive and prosper in the politicial environment of contemporary and future British society is within the medium of the Nationalist movement.

But the Culturists reject the Nationalists, as Culturists are unwilling to accept the reality that demography is the foundation of culture.

Culturists seek not victory in politics but crave acceptance by Liberals.

They chase approval and validation, not power and liberty. But the liberals will always despise them.

Therefore the best amongst the Culturists must work within Nationalism, and not attack it from outside whilst wishing for a politics that will never happen.

Time is too short.










http://www.globalpolitician.com/25646-europe-far-right

Culturist Solutions, Vlaams Belang, the BNP and the USA

Prof. John Press - 5/25/2009

Blogs and political parties focus on the spread of Islam. They have made us aware – if terrorism did not – of the danger Islam can pose to western civilization. But, what solutions can be had? Many worry that right – leaning political parties such as the BNP and Vlaams Belang will, for lack of positive options, move towards advocating ethnic cleansing. Such actions would completely undermine our values and cause major civil unrest. This policy could destroy the West. Culturism relies on history. American history provides lots of positive, legal solutions to the fear of Islamic law growing in western nations.

We have long taken culturist action based upon an appreciation for our culture and its fragility. Puritans, the two Great Awakenings, the Freeman's bureau and Beecher's spreading of women's schools, Abolition and Prohibition, our naturalization and immigration laws, progressivism, the FCC and the Americanization movement all illustrate that we have a culturist heritage. Culturist mass movements of concerned citizens provided the impetus for many of these culturist episodes and mechanisms. We must again come to see ourselves as a culturist nation.

Our culturist immigration laws provide an example of solutions from our history. The 1921 and 1924 immigration laws capped thirty years of culturist agitation. These excluded Southern and Eastern Europeans. The quotas were based on the 1890 census. Right or wrong, culturist immigration laws fall within the scope of our traditions. We also have many other immigration court cases to draw upon. The obvious application is having another culturist law aimed at restricting immigration from Islamic nations. This is not racist, it is culturist. If such laws cannot now pass legal muster, you'd get the same effect by outlawing immigration from terrorist nations. Certainly this is within the rights of our nation.

We also have the right to take our naturalization laws seriously. There is a language component. Besides this, there is a loyalty clause; becoming an American citizen means disavowing allegiance to foreign potentates. We have tossed out folks who advocated the overthrow of our government for violating the loyalty clause before. Another legal tool is ending of monetary remittance to the home country. This would stop American funding of Jihad. People who then stayed here would be clearer that they were working towards the betterment of this nation. We can also stand up for our legal system as a component of our culture. That means saying no to Islamic or Sharia law. That means no polygamy, etc. Taking these culturist stances in law would help

Without invoking legal changes we can insist that schools once again recognize their traditional culturist mission. These need to teach our historical western narrative as a progressive one. One also based on values of duty and responsibility. You teach this by teaching the culturist history mentioned above. The schools of all nations are culturist. They transmit the dominant culture. We should enlarge the scope of our national holidays. We should have thematic parades, etc. This does not mean that those who do not want to partake must, but we have a right to celebrate our majority culture. When it is a good culture, like ours, it is good to do so and serves important culturist purposes.

We must welcome foreign investment, but we cannot allow culturist imperialism in the form of Saudi Funded Whabbi Mosques. Obviously, because of the 1st Amendment, citizens may build whatever religious complexes they like. But, just as we have no international right to build churches in Saudi Arabia or China, there is no international right to build mosques in America. And, herein, demographics are important; we live in a democracy. That means, in part, the majority gets to direct the community via votes. That is self-government. If we wish to vote in such restrictions we may.

The ACLU needs to be counterbalanced by recognizing the legal standing of the majority culture. This is also a tradition. Read the first and second Supreme Court cases concerning Jehovah's Witnesses. The need for a community to perpetuate itself has traditionally had standing. And throughout most of our history the law has assumed the existence of culturist rights exist and balance out individual rights. The modern idea that one individual's sensitivities overrule the entire community's right to perpetuate traditions should be questioned. You do not have the right to build a porn shop next to an elementary school. Self-governance is our tradition.

We must also remember that culturist profiling is not racist profiling. And that while racist profiling would be bad, culturist profiling - because diversity is real - is rational and necessary. Splitting the two allows rational dialogue. This allows you to explain to Muslim citizens of America, that only strongly anti-American mosques and their members will be watched. You can get some in the Muslim community to acknowledge that this is necessary. And then we must scrupulously avoid keeping an eye on anyone for whom there is no probable cause. This way you can have legal, rational security, without violating the rights of Americans. If we violate the rights of people with no sensitivity, resentment will be justified. We have no need to, and should not, antagonize any good Muslim citizens.

Were the demographics frozen as they are now, were Muslims to get no adverse treatment, were radical mosques to stop spreading, were remittance and western cultural laws used to remove the incentive for radicals to move to America, the remaining Muslim population would likely become fairly content and moderate. Remember that rising populations and intimidation feed terrorism. If we praise our culture in our schools and in our discussions, if we provide fun holidays, most every citizen will more enjoy being an American. This is a positive program. It will reap more rewards than pure negativity and unjust discrimination.

We also need to change our international outlook. We must replace the globalist vision with a culturist vision. We have a side in international disputes. Despite what multiculturalists say, we have a core culture. We are the West. We are not the world. Since other nations do not accept refugees we need not. Other nations are culturist, we be so too. We should support Israel and other western nations because they are western. We should not send aid to Muslim countries. Muslim countries do not help us out. We should not be the only non-culturist civilization.

To initiate any of this, we need a shift in public discourse. Right now we would dismiss many of the above solutions as 'racist.' These culturst policies have nothing to do with race. We must recognize them as culturist. This will allow us to discuss such policies rationally on the basis of cultural diversity being real. And, we must embrace this fact. Multiculturalism needs to be counterbalanced. We will always have diversity. But we must stress our unity. We must avoid the extremes of both those who only wish to blindly celebrate diversity and those who preach hatred of Muslims, but provide no positive solutions. The West must acknowledge cultural diversity and start talking about legal and reasonable culturist solutions.

We can help foster culturist awareness and policies by using the terms culturism and culturist. When we use the word culturism we challenge multiculturalism. In every education school in America, students should demand culturst courses counterbalance the multiculturalist ones. When we use the word culturist we help silence those who abuse the word racism to stop conversations. When invoking the words, we stop being the only globalists on the planet and counterbalance the anti-social use of individual rights in the Courts. Finally, using the terms culturism and culturist help us remember our culturist traditions. Unlike multiculturalism, unlike the hysteria of racists, culturism and culturists point to many positive solutions.


John Press is an adjunct professor at New York University.

DOS Attack - Who Did It ?

The recent attack on the BNP website is evidence of a worrying trend.

On thursday the website of an bill board company hosting BNP advertisments was attacked by DOS attempts from hijacked computers.

The source of this attack was allegedly traced back to a server linked to Bluestate Digital and Searchlight, both of whom are now under investigation for a variety of interesting criminal offences.

The location of the ISP's used in this attack against the billboard company was mainly hijacked computers based in Eastern Europe and Russia.

Then on Friday afternoon the BNP website was hit with a massive DOS attack for approx one hour.

Then starting from 17.30 Saturday night another massive attack also targeted the BNP website with another DOS attack.

Guess where this came from - yep. Eastern Europe, Russia and Lithuania.

Isnt that a strange coincidence.

Two attacks in two days both from the same place and both linked to the BNP.

I think there may just be a connection there.

On sunday morning I contacted the Counter-Terrorism Unit, Scotland Yard and MI5 to inform them that one of the largest DOS attacks in British electronic warfare history was underway against the BNP.

I said ' Today the BNP, tomorrow the NHS or the Bank of England'. They got the point.

Also note that Lancaster Unity, who facilitated and incited and assisted the attacks and threats against the bill board company are also under police investigation.

The police had better make sure all flights from the UK to Israel are now closely monitored for fleeing Searchlight, Bluestate Digital and Lancaster Unity idiots.

A Message For Peter Hitchins

Image - Trotsky and Lenin.




I would have posted this response to your lastest your Daily Mail blog article peter but I note you now have blocked my e mail from leaving comments on the site, though usually you never allow them to be posted online anyway so no real loss.

Today the penny finally dropped about you peter.

You are still a Marxist, though one that today masquerades as a Reactionary.

Peter was a Trotskyist who was a member of the International Socialists from 1969 to 1975, and joined the British Labour Party in 1977, campaigning for Ken Livingstone's parliamentary candidature for Hampstead in the 1979 general election.

Hitchens left the Labour Party in 1983 when he became a political reporter at the Daily Express and thought it "no longer appropriate to carry a party card".

Peter wasnt just one your usual 'reds' though, one of those pathetic simpering 'ruprechts and ruperts' drooling, mewling idiots we see holding a Hope Not Hate poster on our streets shouting ' Waaaaccciiisst' but a Revolutionary Red, a member of the Revolutionary Red intelligensia.

For 6 years he was a Revolutionary Red, and one of the top turds perched upon the pile of hundreds of thousands of little turds.

Then then he became a political red, moving into the Establishment from university.

Then he became a media red - and then all of a sudden he became a Paleo-Conservative Reactionary writing in the Daily Mail.

Bullshit.

This was a phased process, a transition from one revolutionary form to another.

The Revolutionary Red who once waved the red flag, was now waving a blue flag for the conservatives - but he was still a red where it counted, on the inside and still committed to the downfall of British society and our way of life.

This creep is the most successful revolutionary red in British history.

He is the Kim Philby of Fleet Street, one of the last great red vipers from the Cold War still nestling in the bosom of the establishment.

He is a serpent that whispers poison into the ears of our society, and his lisps are the whispers of treason inside our city gate.

He whispers of sterility, senility, servitude and apathy.

The idea that an ideologically committed Revolutionary Red like Hitchens could become an ideologically Paleo-Conservative Reactionary is so rare that I cannot see it happening.

The phased process of Peter Hitchens conversion also suggests a Red moving into the mainstream of the Establishment and then working within the Establishment using classic Gramscian methodology - eg being someone who is using the right wing media to ensure the entire right wing of British politics, from paleo-conservatism to nationalism, are unable to organise.

Therefore I suggest that he and his brother as Gramscists made a conscious decision to use the media from inside the media against the social and cultural values that bound our nation together.

Christopher attacks the centre from the left, Peter from the right.

Each eats away at the centre whilst also ensuring the political forces, social forces and cultural forces of Nationalism and Classic Liberalism, which were once at the core of our society, are unable to organise within society.

Peter Hitchens ensures that the ideas, values and ideology of Nationalism are attacked in the media and that paelo-conserative reaction is promoted to the masses. He seeks to perpetuate the same conservative social forces, institutions, ideas, values and ideology that have led to the current crisis.

This allows the Corporatocracy to remain in power either with a Leftist multi-culturalism perspective or a Paleo-Conservative Globalist perspective.

Hitchens supports the Church, traditional conservative values and liberal conservative values.

Yet these are the very institutions that have been hijacked by the Left and infected with political correctness.

Empowering politically the Church of England in todays society is like empowering the Communist Party - the old Nationalist Church of England for the English people that represented the interests of England and the English is now regarded as 'racist' by a majority of those frock wearing freaks and reds that infest its palaces and cathedrals.

Therefore supporting those institutions or empowering those institutions merely empowers the enemies of Nationalism.

Peter Hitchens says 'DO NOT VOTE, TORY, BNP OR UKIP' and therefore at a stroke the entire right wing of British politics is immediately disengaged from participating in the political process, thereby allowing the left and liberals to organise and impose the Servile State upon us.

He supports the most reactionary, regressive forces in British society being re-empowered, feeble institutions such as the Church of England now in the grip of liberal senility, in order to ensure NATIONALIST forces are unable to arise and organise, both within and outside those institutions.

He supports a paleo-conservative party of the right, which nowhere exists other than in his own mind, whose political manifesto, programme and agenda is simply to perpetuate the failed values of the Tory reactionary right that caused the crisis in society the first place. The fact that no such party of the paleo-conservative right exists or will ever exist means he spend the entire time attacking and undermining the political groups that do organise to represent the right in elections.

Therefore even if Hitchens dream party did arise and flourish - its paleo-conservative values would merely pepetuate and repeat the mistakes of the paleo-conservative past. Its very existence would ensure our nations destruction.

Hitchens stands, knees knocking with fear, before the ideal of Nationalism.

He fears and hates Nationalism as much as the Marxists and Capitalists fear and hate Nationalism.

Peter looks at Nationalism and his bottom lip quivers.

" Better a slow death and cultural alzheimers than rebirth and the nationalist revolution ", are the words of the old grey men of the past of the establishment political parties and their puppet politicians - or they are the whispers of a sly old wolf still hunting down its prey in the darkness of a deceit.

Hitchens wants our country chained forever to the dead historical weight of Conservatism and the Tory Party.

There can be only one response to Globalism and that is Nationalism.

By embracing and perpetuating the values and ideals of Conservatism we as a people and nation will merely perpetuate and repeat the mistakes of the past.

We demand a new future under Nationalism.

Hitchens demands we abandon politics, embrace a dead culture of conservatism and surrender our politics to an emasculated Tory Party.

If the worst that Hitchens can do for the country is demand a return to the obsolete ideology and politics of Conservatism in the Daily Mail, then he truly is the most dangerous Red in the country.

If he aint red, then he ought to be.

Hitlers Indian Army

Image - Waffen SS Free Indian Division with regimental flag at SS parade.




Apparently Hope Not Hate's latest web attack on the BNP is based on an image of a Sikh soldier in WW2.

According to Hope Not Hate the presence of Sikh soldiers in the British Army in WW2 demands we surrender the borders of our nation and allow in unlimited immigration into our country.

Heres some other images from WW2 - of Sikh and Hindu soldiers fighting for the German army.

The Free Indian Division of Indian Sikh and Hindu soldiers were even a formation within the Waffen SS.

Funny how they never make any films about the Indian SS soldiers who fought for India.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3684288.stm

Hitler's secret Indian army
By Mike Thomson
BBC News


In the closing stages of World War II, as Allied and French resistance forces were driving Hitler's now demoralised forces from France, three senior German officers defected.

Legionnaires were recruited from German POW camps

The information they gave British intelligence was considered so sensitive that in 1945 it was locked away, not due to be released until the year 2021.

Now, 17 years early, the BBC's Document programme has been given special access to this secret file.

It reveals how thousands of Indian soldiers who had joined Britain in the fight against fascism swapped their oaths to the British king for others to Adolf Hitler - an astonishing tale of loyalty, despair and betrayal that threatened to rock British rule in India, known as the Raj.

The story the German officers told their interrogators began in Berlin on 3 April 1941. This was the date that the left-wing Indian revolutionary leader, Subhas Chandra Bose, arrived in the German capital.

Bose, who had been arrested 11 times by the British in India, had fled the Raj with one mission in mind. That was to seek Hitler's help in pushing the British out of India.

He wanted 500 volunteers who would be trained in Germany and then parachuted into India. Everyone raised their hands. Thousands of us volunteered

Lieutenant Barwant Singh


Six months later, with the help of the German foreign ministry, he had set up what he called "The Free India Centre", from where he published leaflets, wrote speeches and organised broadcasts in support of his cause.

By the end of 1941, Hitler's regime officially recognised his provisional "Free India Government" in exile, and even agreed to help Chandra Bose raise an army to fight for his cause. It was to be called "The Free India Legion".

Bose hoped to raise a force of about 100,000 men which, when armed and kitted out by the Germans, could be used to invade British India.

He decided to raise them by going on recruiting visits to Prisoner-of-War camps in Germany which, at that time, were home to tens of thousands of Indian soldiers captured by Rommel in North Africa.

Volunteers

Finally, by August 1942, Bose's recruitment drive got fully into swing. Mass ceremonies were held in which dozens of Indian POWs joined in mass oaths of allegiance to Adolf Hitler.


Chandra Bose did not live to see Indian independence

These are the words that were used by men that had formally sworn an oath to the British king: "I swear by God this holy oath that I will obey the leader of the German race and state, Adolf Hitler, as the commander of the German armed forces in the fight for India, whose leader is Subhas Chandra Bose."

I managed to track down one of Bose's former recruits, Lieutenant Barwant Singh, who can still remember the Indian revolutionary arriving at his prisoner of war camp.

"He was introduced to us as a leader from our country who wanted to talk to us," he said.

"He wanted 500 volunteers who would be trained in Germany and then parachuted into India. Everyone raised their hands. Thousands of us volunteered."

Demoralised

In all 3,000 Indian prisoners of war signed up for the Free India Legion.

But instead of being delighted, Bose was worried. A left-wing admirer of Russia, he was devastated when Hitler's tanks rolled across the Soviet border.

Matters were made even worse by the fact that after Stalingrad it became clear that the now-retreating German army would be in no position to offer Bose help in driving the British from faraway India.

When the Indian revolutionary met Hitler in May 1942 his suspicions were confirmed, and he came to believe that the Nazi leader was more interested in using his men to win propaganda victories than military ones.

So, in February 1943, Bose turned his back on his legionnaires and slipped secretly away aboard a submarine bound for Japan.


Rudolf Hartog remembers parting with his Indian friends
There, with Japanese help, he was to raise a force of 60,000 men to march on India.

Back in Germany the men he had recruited were left leaderless and demoralised. After much dissent and even a mutiny, the German High Command despatched them first to Holland and then south-west France, where they were told to help fortify the coast for an expected allied landing.

After D-Day, the Free India Legion, which had now been drafted into Himmler's Waffen SS, were in headlong retreat through France, along with regular German units.

It was during this time that they gained a wild and loathsome reputation amongst the civilian population.

The former French Resistance fighter, Henri Gendreaux, remembers the Legion passing through his home town of Ruffec: "I do remember several cases of rape. A lady and her two daughters were raped and in another case they even shot dead a little two-year-old girl."

Finally, instead of driving the British from India, the Free India Legion were themselves driven from France and then Germany.

Their German military translator at the time was Private Rudolf Hartog, who is now 80.

"The last day we were together an armoured tank appeared. I thought, my goodness, what can I do? I'm finished," he said.

"But he only wanted to collect the Indians. We embraced each other and cried. You see that was the end."

Mutinies

A year later the Indian legionnaires were sent back to India, where all were released after short jail sentences.

But when the British put three of their senior officers on trial near Delhi there were mutinies in the army and protests on the streets.

With the British now aware that the Indian army could no longer be relied upon by the Raj to do its bidding, independence followed soon after.

Not that Subhas Chandra Bose was to see the day he had fought so hard for. He died in 1945.

Since then little has been heard of Lieutenant Barwant Singh and his fellow legionnaires.

At the end of the war the BBC was forbidden from broadcasting their story and this remarkable saga was locked away in the archives, until now. Not that Lieutenant Singh has ever forgotten those dramatic days.

"In front of my eyes I can see how we all looked, how we would all sing and how we all talked about what eventually would happen to us all," he said.

Nuff Said - The Media and Schopenhauer

Image - another great graphic from the best computer artist political activist around today. The Banksy of the Real Resistance.





Arthur Schopenhauer, the German philosopher (1788 - 1860) wrote ;


All truth passes through three stages.

First, it is ridiculed.

Second, it is violently opposed.

Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.


Note that in the last 24 hours alone the media have passed through the first two stages in regard to the BNP.

First they tried to mock us as they did today in The Telegraph ;

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5379149/Stop-talking-up-the-comical-BNP.html


At the same time the media in The Guardian were talking about how much of a threat to society we are, as opposed to a political threat, with its asine rhetoric of 'Nazism', 'racism' etc etc ;

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/may/24/bnp-european-elections-nick-cohen


On June 4th the truth of stage three will be made clear to the media when the people vote.

You can feel the fear of the media. It is already palapable.

It is the stench of the plague pit, rancorous with the stinking effluvium of rotting vermin.

The Corporatocracy, the false media, the Banksters and the puppet politicians who at present are the predominant powers in British society now face the once force they fear more than any other - the awakened powers of nascent NATIONALISM.

Whilst socialism suckles greedily on the plastic tits of capitalism, only Nationalism stands to defend our land, folk and liberty.


Land, Folk and Liberty.

This is our Land. We are the People. We will be Free.

This is the motto of a movement awakening to its rebirth.