Wednesday, 3 February 2010

Haiti and the White People

http://www.rense.com/general89/brll.htm


Haiti And The Blacks!

By Loose Canon (a Black man)
Botswana News Paper Southern Africa
1-29-10


I hope black people will learn a lesson from the earthquake that hit Haiti.
If they don't learn anything from it, then I throw up my hands in despair and give up.

Let's start with a few basic facts.
Until the earthquake, I never knew there was a place called Haiti. I was taught geography at school but I cannot remember a time when the mistress told us about Haiti. It must have been one of those insignificant countries that we had no reason to know about.

I was fairly good at geography because I knew which country was on which continent. I also knew many capital cities. But as for Haiti I was clueless.

Now the whole world, including myself, knows about Haiti. I heard news of the earthquake on the radio. I wondered where Haiti was and what sort of people lived there.

Finally, when I switched on the television, I was informed that Haiti is an island out in the Caribbean. Television pictures revealed a place populated by black people.

From the non-stop television coverage of the earthquake, I got to learn about the history of Haiti. It was not a good history lesson. It would seem throughout its existence Haiti has suffered a series of natural calamities. In the process it has sunk even deeper into poverty and deprivation.

Like all places populated by black people, Haiti is poor. As I watched the television images, I felt very sorry for that forsaken place. Then I was hit by a thunderbolt.

I wondered what if there were no white people. You see, when the earthquake hit Haiti somebody had to come to its assistance. There had to be a rescue effort. The Haitians who survived of course did their fair bit by digging out their families from the collapsed ramshackle buildings.

But such was the scale of the devastation and the loss of human life that a bigger effort was needed. For that sort of work, you need heavy lifting gear and other sophisticated rescue equipment. I have been following the story of the earthquake keenly. I can attest to the fact that the first people to arrive with sniffer dogs were white crews from all over the world.

The aero planes that set off carrying water and food were from white countries. Not only that, the teams of volunteer doctors that I saw on television comprised white people from across the world. As the sniffer dogs went into action, the organized rescue teams that carried the stretchers were made up of white people.

It was announced that a mobile hospital was on the way. It was coming from a white country. For all intents and purposes in the aftermath of the earthquake, Haiti was literally swarming with white people. They had all arrived to save the poor blacks. And the locals were so happy to see them. Granted there were teams from the Orient such as the Chinese and Japanese. They too had quickly left their homes and families to go and assist the stricken people of Haiti.
It is obvious to everyone that this was a devastating earthquake and the work to repair Haiti and return it to a modicum of normalcy will take many years. Somebody had to commit funds to this effort. Most of the countries that have committed funds to aid the recovery are white. In fact, it would seem the whites are running the show in Haiti.

What is my point?

My point is that ever since Haiti was hit by the earthquake I have not seen any of my folks from Africa. Unless the television cameras deliberately ignored them, I never saw a rescue team from my motherland. Nor did I see any sniffer dogs from down here.

Heck, I never saw a single traditional doctor busy divining where to find people buried under the rubble.

Haiti is a land of black people. I would have expected the place to be swarming with black people helping their own. They were nowhere to be seen. I never saw any ships from black countries pulling into the harbour.

As the air traffic circled above the small airport, none of the planes was reported as coming from Africa. The blacks were nowhere to be found. They issued tepid statements of condolence to the people of Haiti and a few of the African countries donated small amounts of cash.

Granted that was better than nothing. But I must say I was disappointed. I was sad because the blacks did not behave as I had expected. You see, for far too long black countries have been insolent to the point of being abusive. They have a tendency of insulting the white man and telling him to keep out of their countries. In fact, black people have the temerity to tell white people they can perfectly survive on their own.

So I had expected the black countries to be consistent and behave true to form. Why didn't black countries tell white countries to stay away from Haiti because we were quite capable of leading the rescue effort? We should have insulted them as we often do at international forums.

There, our countries insult white countries and accuse them of imperialism and neo colonialism. I was extremely disappointed when our countries failed to accuse white people of practicing imperialism and neo colonialism by coming to rescue the blacks of Haiti.

We should have told them we have better sniffer dogs that have been taught only to rescue black people. We should have told their ships to stay away and their planes not to overfly Haiti because we were up to the job with our own ships and aeroplanes.

We should have brought in our traditional food instead of the strange rations the Haitians are not accustomed to.

I am so disappointed by the black leaders that I hope never to hear them again bleating about how bad white people are. The earthquake in Haiti was the most opportune time to show the whites, once and for all, that we don't need them.

From now onwards, I want black leaders to shut up and never accuse, ever, white people of being bad. I am sick and tired of big words such as imperialism and neo colonialism which are unable to rescue victims of the earthquake.









Add to Technorati Favorites

The Fruits of Tolerance




Image - Abu Hamza, immigrant.





Image - Karl Marx, asylum seeker and immigrant.





The writer Wole Soyinka has stated something that is very true about Britain.

Because of Britains tolerance and its willingness to allow 'asylum seekers' to come here, the most murderous ideology of all history, Communism, was spawned here and now the evil of Islamism is being spread around the world from here.

Marx was an 'asylum seeker' and most of the Islamist scum in the UK spreading Islamism worldwide are also 'asylum seekers' or immigrants.

Because of Britains 'tolerance' we have allowed evil to flourish here and then spread worldwide.

Wole Soyinka is right.

England is a cesspit because of our tolerance of scum like Marx and Abu Hamza and the Islamists whose rights we out before our own people, and before the rights of those who are being slaughtered around the world by their accomplices.

The reason why we have a surveillance society in the UK is because we have so many of the worlds criminals living here we have had to become a fascist state in order to prevent them causing chaos and carnage.

Liberalism is the progenitor of fascism.



http://bnp.org.uk/2010/02/britain-has-become-%E2%80%9Ca-cesspit-of-islamists%E2%80%9D-says-unesco-ambassador/


When asked what he thought of his homeland of Nigeria being added to the watch list of countries deemed to be incubating terrorists after the failed attempts of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to bomb an airliner in December, Mr Soyinka said that this was “an irrational, knee-jerk reaction by the Americans.

“The man did not get radicalised in Nigeria. It happened in England, where he went to university.

“England is a cesspit. England is the breeding ground of fundamentalist Muslims. Its social logic is to allow all religions to preach openly. But this is illogic, because none of the other religions preach apocalyptic violence. And yet England allows it. Remember, that country was the breeding ground for Communism, too. Karl Marx did all his work in libraries there,” he said.

Mr Soyinka said that Muslims were being radicalised early in their lives in Britain.

“I doubt you can have the kind of indoctrination schools in America as you do in the UK,” he said.







Add to Technorati Favorites

Energy Entropy and Extra-Terrestrial Life

For a while I have been working on a new theory regarding the strange phenomena of the mathematical coincidences within the Solar System.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5h_qoHCn7k

I believe that humanity have been looking for the evidence of intelligent extraterrestrial life in the wrong place and in the wrong way.

It is my theory that the evidence for extra-terrestrial life will be found not in flickering phone footage of UFO's or in radio signals from space - but within the context of the intelligent design of the Solar System itself.

The theory is based on the following foundations ;

1) All life on earth is based on Darwinian Natural Selection, therefore we can posit that all life in the universe arose the same way.

2) An end to Darwinian Natural Selection occurs when the energy entropy issue is solved. Once infinite energy is unlocked eg from the Zero Point Energy Field then infinite living space in the universe is unlocked, infinite resources for use to sustain that civilisation is unlocked and infinite energy use able to sustain that civilisation on its spread throughout the universe is unlocked.

3) Once the energy entropy issue is solved then Darwinian Natural Selection stops, as the necessity for constant struggle to secure resources to sustain life ends. Therefore any advanced alien civilisation that unlocks infinite energy and able to travel throughout the universe will not be a civilisation interested in the conquest of less advanced civilisations.

4) I believe that all highly advanced civilisations that have unlocked infinite energy would embark on the ultimate quest - the creation of new life itself. I would expect that in order to allow the forms of life they create to understand their origins once they reached a sufficiently advanced technological level that they would encode WITHIN MATHEMATICS the fact of their presence. Any civilisation capable of crossing the vast expanses of space would be hugely powerful, hugely advanced and capable of planetary engineering at a massive level. It would be within mathematics, the one language of all advanced civilisations throughout the universe, that proof of their existence will be found.


This is why I believe the mathematical 'coincidences' that are present within the alignments of the earth, moon and sun, and the fact that the solar system seems aligned to allow life to develop, is evidence of the presence of an highly advanced extraterrestrial civilisation that created the Solar System, aligned the planets and ensured that life would flourish on earth.

The fact that the latest research on the origins of life agree that life did not develop on Earth but was seeded on Earth from elsewhere in the Universe, is also evidence sustaining this theory.

I believe that rather than looking out into the universe for signs of the presence of extra-terrestrial life, the evidence is already here.

It is the Solar System, it is Earth, it is the fact that we exist in the Habitable Zone and are protected by Jupiter.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/08/070827-jupiter-comets.html

It is us.

The proof is in the mathematics of the Solar System and probably also encoded somewhere within us within our DNA.













http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7136269/All-humans-are-aliens-from-outer-space-scientist-claims.html


Prof Chandra Wickramasinghe, of Cardiff University, said new research "overwhelmingly" supported the view that human life started from outside our Earth.

The Astrobiologist said the first "seeds of life" were deposited on our plant from space 3,800m years ago.

He claimed microbes from outer space arrived on earth from comets, which then "multiplied and seeded" to form human life.

His said his evidence, published in Cambridge University's International Journal of Astrobiology, showed humans, and all life on Earth, came from aliens brought to the earth by comets hitting the planet.

"Yes, we are all aliens – we share a cosmic ancestry," Prof Wickramasinghe said.

"Each time a new planetary system forms a few surviving microbes find their way into comets.

"These then multiply and seed other planets."

He added: ""We are thus part of a connected chain that extends over a large volume of the cosmos. Evidence is pointing inexorably in this direction."

Prof Wickramasinghe believes life is transferred from planet to planet over billions of years.

He believes comets hit planets and pushed living matter out into space.

He said some survived and got transferred to new planets over a timescale of millions and millions of years.

But he accepts this model still does not explain how life actually began in the first place.

The professor and his late colleague Sir Fred Hoyle championed the so-cllaed "panspermia" theory from the 1960s.

"Evidence from astronomy overwhelmingly supports the view that life did not start on Earth but was seeded from outside," Prof Wickramasinghe said.

"Although we have no definite knowledge how life started in the first place, once started its spread in the cosmos and survival is inevitable.

"As we enter a new decade – the year 2010 – a clear pronouncement of our likely alien ancestry and of the existence of extraterrestrial life on a cosmic scale."


















Add to Technorati Favorites

Tories Reveal Energy Security Plan = more globalism

Below we see the Tories energy security plan for Britain = more globalism, more dependence on foreign imports, more foreign wars, more energy imperialism and more terrorism.

Trust the dumb Tories to miss the obvious = create a 100 % national independence renewable energy plan as the BNP proposes so we no longer need to start illegal wars such as in Iraq to take their oil and in Afghanistan to secure the pipelines that transport the oil to the West.

Nor need we ever be again dependent upon Arab oil and Russian gas.

We shall be a free nation - and thats not what the Tories, Labour, UKIP and Liberals are in power for.

They intend to keep us slaves in the globalist nexus.




http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7011746.ece



Military 'should protect energy supplies'
Ben Webster, Environment Editor

* 5 Comments

Recommend? (3)

Britain must prepare to use military power to protect its energy supplies as it becomes increasingly dependent on imported oil and gas, according to the Conservatives.

Nato should help to police sea lanes to keep supply routes open and prevent energy shortages from causing black outs and disruption to the economy. Baroness Neville-Jones of Hutton Roof, the Shadow Security Minister, said Britain could not depend on market forces to deliver security of energy supply.

In a report published today by Green Alliance , an environmental think-tank, she writes that, despite the plans for 6,000 off-shore wind turbines, Britain would remain heavily reliant on imported fossil fuels for many more decades.

“In 2050 imported fossil fuels could still account for 40-60 per cent of consumption, with virtually all oil and gas coming from abroad.
Related Links

* National Grid issues fourth gas shortage alert

* Manufacturers call for more gas storage

“In a situation where the greater part - some say up to 90 per cent - of the world’s known energy reserves are controlled by government-owned enterprises, not all especially friendly, the UK cannot just leave everything to the market: a totally laissez faire approach is no longer sufficient to protect the national interest.

“Resource nationalism is on the rise and politically motivated disruptions of supply are on the increase. Russia plays a petro power game and gas pipelines supplying Europe are also vulnerable.” The depletion of Britain’s North Sea oil and gas fields mean that it now imports around a quarter of it energy. By 2020, this is due to rise to 39-43 per cent and by 2025 to 47-50 per cent.

Britain is becoming particularly reliant on imported gas, which the Department of Energy and Climate Change predicts will account for 61 per cent of gas consumed here by 2025.

During last month’s long cold spell, National Grid cut the gas supply to dozens of factories to cope with increased demand from homes.

Britain has only 15 days of gas in storage in case of disruption to supplies. France has enough stored gas to last 122 days and Germany 99 days.

Even under optimistic estimates of the rate of construction of new gas storage facilities, Britain will still only have 36 days capacity by 2020.

Lady Neville-Jones said: “It seems doubtful, in the face of the multiplicity of risks in the international marketplace and the vulnerability of the UK to them, if this will be enough even to ensure supply through crisis.” Britain will lose a third of its electricity generating capacity over the next decade as inefficient coal plants are closed under European environmental regulations and 40-year-old nuclear stations reach the end of their working life.

Lady Neville-Jones said these closures “could result in blackouts by 2014-15”. With the population due to rise from 60 million to 70 million by 2029, rising demand would place even greater stress on the energy supply network.

She said: “British strategic energy interests and security of supply should be at the heart of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and Ministry of Defence priorities and decisions.” The MoD needed to focus on “the tasking of our armed forces, especially the Royal Navy, concerning the security of the sea lanes and the safety of maritime traffic”.

She said energy security would be an increasingly important issue for the world and Britain should work with its military allies on securing supplies.

“Nato forces should help police sea lanes and provide solidarity and mutual assistance in the event of major disruption to energy supplies to member states.

“The EU must develop a coherent and consistent strategy in relation to Russia, improve the physical links in the European gas grid and take further internal liberalization of the European energy market.”

Baroness Neville-Jones said the Government needed better military planning to protect energy supplies from terrorism and piracy. She said there had been at least 330 terrorist attacks on oil and gas facilities worldwide between 1990 and 2005.

















Add to Technorati Favorites

Tuesday, 2 February 2010

Frank The Plank






Spot the mistake.

Yep, this is UKIP's candidate who cannot even spell the name of the country he lives in.

Twat.




















Add to Technorati Favorites

Paedophile Media, Politicians and Teachers

We live in a sick society that sexualises children.

The media peddle sexual imagery to children, glorify sluts and whores who are celebrities, glorify pornstars and plastic titted slappers, demean women by having them in MTV videos gyrating in bikinis before rapper morons and we have a society that sexualises them at school and then forces them to sexually develop early.

Its a Paedophile Nation.



Children taught sex education are more likely to have intercourse younger, says study

By Anny Shaw
Last updated at 1:31 PM on 02nd February 2010

* Comments (63)
* Add to My Stories

Young teacher standing in front of the blackboard, talking about sex education and contraception, holding a pack of contraceptive

Children given lessons in safe sex are more likely to have intercourse younger, a study has found

Children given lessons in safe sex are more likely to have intercourse younger, a study has found.

Those who have sex at a young age can also lack the maturity to use contraceptives, exposing them to the risk of sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies.

Teaching abstinence is the best way to avoid pregnancy and STDs, according to researchers.

Children aged between 11 and 15 who were taught about safe sex were more likely to have sex in the following two years than those given a lesson on abstinence.

In a study involving 600 African American students, half of the group taught sex education reported that they had sexual intercourse over the next two years compared to one third of the group given the abstinence lesson.

Dr John Jemmott, professor of Communication in Psychiatry and of Communication at the University of Pennsylvania said: 'It is extremely important to find an effective intervention that delays sexual activity.

'The younger someone is when they have sex for the first time, the less likely they are to use condoms.

'Abstinence-only interventions may have an important role in delaying sexual activity until a time later in life when the adolescent is more prepared to handle to consequences of sex.

'This can reduce undesirable consequences of sex, including pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections like HIV and Aids.'

The study, published in the journal Archives of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, found there were no differences in condom use or unprotected sex across any of the groups.

The researchers said the findings do not suggest that abstinence is the best teaching approach or that all others should be abandoned.

The authors wrote: 'What the present results suggest is that theory-based abstinence-only interventions can be part of this mix.

'Using theory-based abstinence-only interventions selectively might contribute to the overall goal of curbing the spread of STIs in both the United States and other countries.'

In Britain sexual education for younger children is increasingly being focused on abstinence.

A spokesman for the Department for Children, Schools and Families said: 'We want to give young people the facts so that they can stay safe and healthy.

'There is no evidence that abstinence education is effective and even the authors of this report don’t indicate teaching abstinence is the best approach.

'We encourage all young people to delay sexual activity and help them to deal with pressure to become sexually active before they are ready.

'We know that 82 per cent of parents support the teaching of sex and relationship education in schools and young people themselves have told us how much they value SRE, telling us it helps them make sense of their relationships and the myths and images they are exposed to.'







Add to Technorati Favorites

Speaking English = RACISM.

Here is the story you needed to read.

In England today if you display the English flag you are called 'racist'.

If you state that you speak English in England, you are racist.

If you put a sign up saying you speak English, to enable people to communicate with you, then you are a racist.

Of course you are not a racist, but the problem is that Britain is run by treasonous, politically correct vermin.

These liberal and leftist scum are traitors.

One day they will be treated as such.

They deserve to be treated with nothing but hatred and contempt.





A racism row has broken out after a city's taxi drivers started displaying stickers in their cars saying they are 'English speaking'.

Up to a dozen drivers have been showing off the notices bearing the St George's Cross on the back windows of their cars in Southampton, Hampshire.

The small red and white sticker declares the cab is being driven by an 'English speaking driver.'
Taxi

A racism row has broken out after taxi drivers in Southampton started displaying stickers in their cars saying they are 'English speaking'

But the flags have been branded 'racist' by trade representatives, councillors and racism campaigners who have demanded they are removed.

Taxi drivers have hit back, claiming the stickers are simply a protest to force the council to make sure new drivers can speak good English.

The stickers were placed in the cars after drivers received complaints about the standard of spoken English among them.

There have also been complaints from passengers about drivers using sat navs and over-charging.
Cllr Brian Parnell

Cllr Brian Parnell said the stickers were 'offensive'

Perry McMillan, chairman of the Southampton cab section of trade union Unite, said the group's ethnic minority members had been upset by the stickers.

He said: 'Surely all drivers speak English. If they don't, then what's going on?

'We hope that licensing officers can investigate this and satisfy the trade that this isn't the case.'

Campaign group Show Racism the Red Card demanded the stickers be taken down from the cab windows.

Chief Executive Ged Grebby said: 'I don't have a problem with displaying the cross of St George because this is a symbol we have managed to reclaim from the far right.

'But the "English speaking driver" part is where it crosses the line into racism.

'Cab drivers have to have a command of English and there are strong racist undertones in this message.

'I think the drivers should take the flags down immediately and if they don't, they should be told to by the council who licences them.'

But taxi drivers have hit back at the allegations of racism.

Clive Johnson, chairman of taxi firm Radio Taxis and the Southampton Trade Association, said: 'These signs are not racial.

'They are a protest to the council saying please make sure all new drivers have command of the English language.

'There are a few drivers out there who cannot speak English and just bluff their way along.

'It doesn't matter if they are Polish, Russian, French or Spanish, if they can't communicate with passengers then it's a problem.'

Taxi driver Peter Ford, 48, said: 'It's just about letting customers know that the driver will actually be able to speak English, which isn't always the case.'

Fellow driver Chris Head, 49, added: 'I have no problem with the stickers.

'Lots of customers will wait at ranks until an English driver comes along because they want someone they can talk to.'

Ian Hall, chairman of the Southampton Hackney Association, said half of the group's 126 members are from an Asian background.

He added: 'I don't think any drivers should have these stickers in the back of their car because it's racist.

'If drivers have got these stickers in their back windows then they need to take them down.'

Mr Hall said night trade in Southampton would 'collapse' without ethnic minority drivers, who buy the majority of taxi plates.

The sticker issue was raised at a meeting between cab firms and Southampton City Council.

It is believed that the council would order them to be removed if it received complaints from passengers.

Chairman of the council's licensing committee Councillor Brian Parnell said the stickers were 'offensive'.

He said: 'It's certainly not the image we want for Southampton.

'It is offensive to drivers from ethnic minorities who form a large part of the city's drivers and without whom Southampton's taxi service would suffer.

'We want to promote harmony in the city.

'But it is important that taxi drivers meet a certain set of standards and one of those is the ability to speak English.

'It is normal good practice for anyone working in another country to be able to speak the language of that country.

'I think the problem might be that many drivers do speak English but with a heavy accent that can be difficult to understand.'

Cllr Don Thomas, who sits on the licensing committee, added: 'Taxis and taxi drivers can form the first impression that visitors have of Southampton.

'I think this is completely the wrong sort of message to be sending out in what is proudly a cosmopolitan city.'

A council spokesman said: 'People should contact the council and let us know if they see signs and stickers being used in taxis, particularly if they find them offensive.'

Currently, anyone who wants to drive a taxi must hold a British driving licence, pass a medical, undergo a criminal record check and complete a 'knowledge' test of Southampton.

Last year council chiefs added a driving assessment and a test in basic reading, writing and communication skills.

Within six months of taking to the road, drivers must also pass a BTec qualification in Road Transport Passenger Driving.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1247944/Taxi-drivers-accused-racism-displaying-sign-saying-English-speaking.html#ixzz0eP9u0txf

















Add to Technorati Favorites