Sunday, 31 May 2009

ANDREW MARR - BBC Apologist for Genocide

Image - Andrew Marr in this months Playgirl " Gollem Gets Butt Naked ".

Image - Andrew Marr interviews the Butcher of Baghdad, the Murderer of the Serbs and the accomplice of KLA ethnic cleansing in Kosovo. " Yes my precious, I will make sure you keep the ring of power ".

It appears that Andrew Marr of the BBC,, one of the premier liberal fascists of the state media, attacked the BNP on his show this morning.

YAWN - what a surprise (not!).

Here is a quote from Andrew Marr as stated in a brilliant article released by John Pilger a few days ago.

" The same was true of the lawless attack on Iraq in 2003, behind which the cross-party Establishment and the political media rallied.

Andrew Marr stood in Downing Street and excitedly told BBC viewers that Blair had “said they would be able to take Baghdad without a bloodbath, and that in the end the Iraqis would be celebrating. And on both of those points he has been proved conclusively right.” When Blair’s army finally retreated from Basra in May, it left behind, according to scholarly estimates, more than a million people dead, a majority of stricken, sick children, a contaminated water supply, a crippled energy grid and four million refugees.

As for the “celebrating” Iraqis, the vast majority, say Whitehall’s own surveys, want the invader out. And when Blair finally departed the House of Commons, MPs gave him a standing ovation – they who had refused to hold a vote on his criminal invasion or even to set up an inquiry into its lies, which almost three-quarters of the British population wanted.

Andrew Marr is a lickspittle of the Labour government and an apologist for genocide.

He and his media cronies beat the drums for the Iraq War and then sought to act as apologists for the total disaster it became.

To be abused and villified by scum such as Andrew Marr is our greatest validation.

When devils cast stones at you and call you a sinner, then you know you truly are one of the good.

Add to Technorati Favorites

The CofE - Money changers in the Temple

King James Version: Matthew Chapter 21

10 And when he was come into Jerusalem, all the city was moved, saying, Who is this?

11 And the multitude said, This is Jesus the prophet of Nazareth of Galilee.

12 And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves,

13 And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.

The Church of England is a vile organisation, infested with pederasts who are protected by Bishops and priests from prosecution and riddled with Marxists who worship Che Guevara instead of Jesus Christ and Marx instead God.

Its priests pontificate from their pulpits and issue moral decrees about who we should vote for, whilst they try and hide beneath the hems of their pretty frocks the myriad dead bodies of those the Church has slaughtered throughout its history from Catholics, Jews, Pagans, Witches to Scientists and those who were against the Kings they served.

The Church of England can never atone for its vile crimes.

The ghosts of those it murderd during its bloody reign still haunt our world. But today they are forgotten by the priests and leaders of the Church.

Today the Church seeks to move once again into politics thereby showing that it has learnt nothing from its history or that it has atoned for its crimes.

Because of its crimes in the past the Chrch of England must never again be allowed to be involved in politics.

Todays liberal vicar is tomorrows Witch Finder General, as all it takes is a change in the nature of society to create a change in the nature of the Church.

The danger is too great to allow any Church or religion dominate our secular society.

The church of england is no longer a church, it is marxist cult. It is no longer English, as it no longer represents the interests of England and it is no longer a Church for the English people as it fills it ranks and pews with the immigrants that fill its coffers with cash.

Denis Diderot wrote that “Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest”.

Today he needs to add to the list 'the last priest and the last media baron'.

The fact that the Church of England is now virtually bankrupt because it poured its money into the money markets is a delicious irony.

Jesus Christ chased the money lenders from the Temple, whilst the Church of England invited the money lenders into its own ranks and sold its soul for gold.

The fact that the money the Church accumulated from its theological blackmail (give us your money and obey us or you will go to hell) has now been lost in the money market crash is an almost Bibilical act of justice.

Those that lay down with the money lenders are corrupted by them.

When I see the massive churches across this country built with money donated from the poorest of our people, it makes me sad.

I know that whilst the poorest of our people lived in total poverty and penury when these churches were being built, the money they gave the Church could have been spent on their children, food for their families, medicine for the sick or for decent homes and to build a fairer society.

Instead all that money went on building churches and palaces and supporting a class of parasites in frocks who lived in total luxury and dined with Kings whilst the people lived in fear, hunger and misery in simple hovels.

When I see a massive Cathedral I see a crime set in stone, not a place of prayer where God or Christ can be experienced.

I imagine how the vast amounts of money used to build those vast buildings could have been spent on helping the poor.

When I visit a church I look at the graves, not the church and note the age of the people buried there and reflect on the lives they had - whilst the Church took their tithes and left them in poverty, whilst the priests waved them off to war and then stayed in their palaces and the Church passed the collection plate about and took money from the mouthes of poor families and children.

Jesus Christ would never have wanted vast cathedrals, palaces and churches built in his name or a class of parasites in frocks wearing gold chains and jewel adorned crucifixes whose opulent lifestyles in their opulent palaces are sustained by donations from the poor faithful - he would have wanted all that money collected by the Church spent on the poor, the sick and the hungry.

He would never have wanted a religion or churches built in his name that threw people into bonfires, hacked them with swords or who damned them to hell for ignoring the demands of Kings and Bishops.

Jesus Christ loved the people, he would have despised the Church.

Finally the false religion that slandered the name of Jesus Christ is about to fall from its own greed and inner corruption.

The new religion of Christos that will replace the insane cult of Marx and Jehovah will be a religion of love and spirit, not pomp, power and wealth.

Every penny of the New Church Novalis will be spent not on erecting monuments to the power of the Church and the vanity of its underlings, but on helping the weak, the poor, the sick, the hungry and the disspossessed.

That is the true example set by Jesus Christ.

Young clergy face life on the dole after Church of England loses £1.3billion

Last updated at 1:02 AM on 31st May 2009
Comments (15) Add to My Stories
No jobs: The Church is turning away graduates of theological colleges

The Church of England is turning away trainee clergy for the first time in history after £1.3billion of its investments were wiped out in the financial crisis.
Up to a dozen graduates of theological colleges will miss out on their ordination next month and may end up on the dole as there are no parish jobs for them.
The Church has previously given all graduates placements in parishes as curates, which they need before they can become ordained as priests.

But now, to the anger of senior clerics, a spending squeeze means the number of junior clergy posts has been reduced and some trainees may quit the Church.
The unprecedented situation comes after the Church Commissioners, who manage the Church’s £5.7billion assets, announced it lost £1.3billion last year as share and property holdings plunged.

One college principal, the Rev Richard Turnbull, of Oxford’s Wycliffe Hall, called the jobs crisis a ‘tragedy and a travesty’ and said he and colleagues would protest strongly to bishops.

He said: ‘The Church of England agrees these individuals are called to the priesthood.

'It agrees that they have been fully and successfully trained. It says they are ready for ordination as priests. Then it just walks away.’

Mr Turnbull added the Church had already spent about £30,000 training each single student and at least £60,000 for married students on three-year residential courses. Those unplaced may be left unemployed while they wait to see if other jobs come up.
He warned: ‘At the moment they are very distressed. They are still confident in God but they are losing confidence in the Church.’

The Commissioners provide about a sixth of the Church’s annual running costs of just over £1billion – mainly for clergy salaries and pensions and the upkeep of buildings. But they now warn they may not be able to maintain their levels of contribution for much longer.

Meanwhile, the 44 dioceses must pay millions extra in clergy pension bills this year under new rules. And it is feared worshippers’ donations – a large proportion of the Church’s annual income – may not meet the shortfall.

An official Church report in January into the effects of the downturn urged wealthy parishioners to put more into the collection plate.

The report by Andrew Britton, chairman of the finance committee of the Archbishops’ Council, said: ‘The current crisis will have a serious and lasting effect in parishes, dioceses and national institutions.’

Mr Turnbull said at least 11 graduates had not been placed this year, and several others were believed to have already taken non-clergy jobs.

He added nearly all the unplaced students had trained at three evangelical colleges – his own, Oak Hill in London and Trinity in Bristol. And he suggested they had not been offered parish jobs because many bishops did not approve of their conservative, Bible-based views.

A Church spokesman said most students had found jobs, and attempts to find places were continuing.

But he added: ‘Dioceses must decide how many clergy they

Add to Technorati Favorites

The Real Enemy are the Media

Image - Barry Bennett and Johnny Depp. (Just kidding) Where did they get this picture from ! Me wearing a suit and tie is about as rare as a full solar eclipse.
Crikey, I am one handsome bloke.

Image - The masses enslaved to the Corporate Media.

The primary enemy of the British people and the main block on the rise to power of the Nationalist political movement is the Corporate Media.

No-one elects the Corporate Media in to power.

No-one is able to hold the media to account other than by defamation actions that cost millions of pounds, therefore excluding ordinary people from ever forcing the media to offer amends to them when they are defamed and lied about.

No-one ever voted for the media to have such power in our society, they have been allowed to accumulate this power because the media control the political parties that they pimp out to the masses.

The Fourth Estate are Fifth Columnists, the enemy within.

They have more power than any Emperor, any King or any Dictator over our society.

They control the minds of millions and are able to control who gets elected to power.

The Corporate Media represents only their own interests, promote only their own economic interests and seek to have only those political parties and politicians that are totally subservient to them and their interests elected into power.

Only those who are whores for the media are allowed into power by the media.

The journalists that work for the Corporate Media are paid to do the work for the Corporate Media, they are nothing more than whores prostituting themselves and their talents for profit.

They dare not go against the interests of their media bosses, for if they ever dared print anything other than Corporate Media propaganda for their bosses they would be sacked.

The article of Muriel Gray is a case in point. A socialist that gets paid by the Corporate Media is a hypocrite.

Muriel Gray is a crap writer.

In fact there is probably only one proper journalist left in Britain and that is Christopher Hitchens.

He may be a lefty liberal drone, but the fact is he is motivated by principle whilst the others are motivated solely by profit.

There are only two other real British journalists apart from Hitchens and both of them live abroad - John Pilger and Mark Steyn.

Mark Steyn was sacked from The Telegraph as he would not bend his knee to the Barclay Brothers.

Therefore the btst British journalist of the last three decades was forced to flee the UK in order to be able to continue his career based on his principles.

The mangy curs in the media that vomit into the papers today are merely whores who sold their principles for profit.

Journalism is dead.

What we have today is Corporate Propaganda pumped out for the interests of the Corporations that own the media companies and for the benefits of the politicians and political parties that are the whores of the media.

Even worse than this dictaorship of the media are the so called 'anti-capitalist leftists' who march against things like the Iraq War and yet still believe the lies the media tell them about the BNP.

It was the Corporate Media who were the primary agents of the Iraq War.

The Corporate Media beat the war drums for Blair and Bush.

The Corporate Media printed and published and propagandised all the bullshit phoney WMD stories, the 45 minutes to a missile strike claims and the rest of the endless BS that the Bush and Blair Junta's wanted published in order to incite the idiot masses into a foaming mass of fear and fury.

The Corporate Media are accomplices to genocide and war crimes.

They must one day face justice for their crime of propagandising the Iraq War, just as the politcians that voted for the war must.



Watch these films below and then realise that you will never be free if you keep believing the lies of the Corporate Slave Masters

Watch this video here for the wake up call that will change your world ;

Watch this vvieo here to see how the media are war criminals ;

Lee Barnes, the BNP's senior legal officer and one of Griffin's closest allies, has posted a video on his personal blog of a black suspect being beaten by police officers in the US and describes it as "brilliant". Barnes adds: "The beating of Rodney King still makes me laugh."

Barnes told the Observer his comments were "nothing to do with colour" but were merely a reflection of his belief that the police should have more powers to punish perpetrators of crime by "giving them a good thrashing".

( The above is the story the Guardian have rung after their call a few days ago when they told me that searchlight was touting the story of my 'racist rant'. Thanks Jamie. Nice one. Thats just the sort of comments we want published.

Unlike the insipid liberal idiots that read The Observer behind their fortified houses in all white estates, real people experience real crime and want real tough solutions to crime.

The definition of a liberal is merely someone who hasnt been mugged or burgled yet.

Give it time, they will all sooner or later experience the fist and boot of their wonderful multi-cultural society smashed down upon their faces.

There is never any mercy given when some white liberal felled by the blows of an ethnic gang of muggers with their white hoody rat lackey tagging on along for the ride, screams out ' You cant do this I am a liberal '.

Sooner or later every liberal will become a victim of their delusions and of the broken society that they have created.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Saturday, 30 May 2009

The News of the Screws - more BS

Image - Jamie Lyons, Deputy News Editor of the News of the World

It looks like The Guardian dropped the story about my 'racist rant' that the reporter who rang me informed me was straight from Searchlight, but now some idiot on the News of the World has repeated the allegations.

It appears that Searchlight even now, after having been exposed as the primary propogators of pure bullshit in British politics, still have plenty of media saps who will still lap up their vomit.

Very interesting.

I shall have to think what to do next - perhaps a defamation action or just a PCC complaint.

Here below is a link to the article and a blog article about The Guardian for those of you who have come from the News of the World website after having read the joke stories printed by the sick perverts that run the paper, who specalise in printing pictures of young semi-naked girls under the guise of 'news'.

If you are one of the sub-literate readers of the News of the World you may need a dictionary to understand the bigger words.

The facts, as opposed to News of the World bullshit here ;

Add to Technorati Favorites

William Rees-Mogg - Has He Gone Senile ?

Image - David Cameron as an insane, badger killing nutcase who also has genocidal plans for his political opponents according to the senile old fart Lord William Rees-Mogg.

William Rees-Mogg it appears is going senile.

In the midst of the worst economic crisis in modern history, he writes an article in The Daily Mail stating that the issue which most concerns 'farmers in Somerset' is the evil spectre of badgers prowling the countryside and waylaying innocent cows.

I kid you not.

Take a read here ;

Along with this article about how much Somerset farmers are straining at the leash to exterminate badgers, he manages to bring in the BNP and puts up an image of David Cameron as an insane badger exterminating nutcase who also appears to be intent on murdering Nick Griffin.

Apparently Nick Griffin is just an animal that can be exterminated at will, just like the Nazis used to do to their political opponents.

William Rees-Mogg is a reactionary old fart who writes well but is simply another Corporate Media reactionary whore.

The fact that such people infest the media is evidence of how debased journalism has become.

Read the Muriel Gray article and the William Rees-Mogg article.

I can only feel ashamed that this is the level to which contemporary journalism has dropped.

We have imbedded journalists that broadcast edited film footage given to them by the military and call that journalism, we have propaganda disguised as journalism in every tabloid and now we have the senile dribblings of this incompetent old fool managing to get into the pages of the Daily Mail.

Frankly the sooner the entire corporate media collapse into bankruptcy, as The Daily Mail, The Independent and The Guardian are all about to do, then the better.

Watching William Rees-Mogg insert his slimy vermiculated worm tongue up David Camerons arse is sickening.

Arise Lord Rees-Mogg - no doubt David Cameron will give you a peerage for arse licking once he gets into power.

Well done you Corporate Media raddled old whore.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Muriel Gray - Idiot No.1

Image - Muriel Gray, Champagne Socialist, Corporate Media Whore. " I cant believe I get paid to write this shit - Cheers ! Kerching Kerching !"

There have been few times when I have read an article from a red and been left speechless.

Muriel Gray just did that.

I remember her from my youth, a mouthy communist Scottish bint with a hyperactivity problem.

Read the article here ;

She must be mad.

She is an intelligent woman, so she must either be totally bonkers or she has abandoned any journalistic integrity and has become simply another pseudo-socialist Corporate Media slut who is paid to act as a whore for the papers that buy and print her drivel.

I actually feel embarrased for her.

This is one of the worst peices of journalism that has ever disgraced the name of journalism.

In an election campaign where the anti-democratic machinations of the Corporate Media have dragged the name of democracy and the media into the gutter, this article is outstanding in its utter idiocy.

The reason why the media print such drivel is because they ensure that the BNP never has a right of reply.

Therefore they dont have to do journalism, they can just print as much bullshit as they like and know that they will not be challenged - however absurd the bullshit they print.

The problem is that the dumbest people in our country, mainly reactionaries of the Tory right and socialists, believe what they are told by the Corporate Media.

This Zombie Army of the media undead, the brainwashed morons that believe everything they are told by the press, then believe that what they read is real.

These idiots are the sort of people like those in America who a century ago when shown a cinema film for the first time, drew their six guns and shot at the indians doing a war dance on the screen.

I call them The Media Frankensteins Idiots.

These are the same sort of people that go on Anti-Capitalist demonstrations and accuse the media of being 'fascists under the control of the capitalists' but then believe everything that the Corporate Media tell them about the BNP !


How can they say' I dont read the papers as they are all racists and fascists' and then read articles printed in those papers about the BNP and then say ' Look what the papers say ! Those bloody BNP are fascists ! '.

The sad fact is that the children of the corporate media, those 'socialists' that say they fight the BNP, are the primary shocktroops of the capitalist elite and the corporate media.

They are slaves, doing exactly what their capitalist and corporate media want them to do.

Those real socialists who died for socialism in the past would be ashamhed of these witless fools that today espouse socialist ideals yet allow themselves to be enslaved to the Corporate Media.

There are no journalists anymore.

There are simply bullshit artists that write bullshit for brainwashed idiots.

The art of journalism is dead, and also the ability of people to even understand what journalism is no longer exists.

Therefore stupidity reigns.

Take a look around you at our nation.

This is the country that the stupids rule.

This is the land where stupidity reigns.

This is the land where the stupids believe every corporate media lie they are told.

This is the land where the stupids are even proud of their stupidity.

Add to Technorati Favorites

My Twitter Account

Hi folks, come and join my new twitter account.

You can then get updates on what I am doing during my day.

From saving the planet to kicking liberal arse - its all here.

Find me here ;

Add to Technorati Favorites

EU Satanic Paedophile Network

Image - Daniel Cohn Bendit, Green MEP, pederast and hero of Lancaster Unity, The Labour Party and Searchlight. This pervert needs to be strung up from a lamp post.

Irish Daily Mail

Monday, May 25th, 2009

By Mary Ellen Synon

The horror at the dark heart of a sordid, arrogant parliament

Here we are, a few words about Brussels and how it feels about child abuse. I’ll move onto the elections for the European parliament in a moment, but given the horrors of the Ryan report last week, I thought that you ought to know how seriously the euro-elite treat any suggestion of improper behaviour by adults towards children.

In other words I give you Daniel Cohn Bendit, an MEP for the German Green Party. He is a self-confessed kiddie-fiddler, but pulling down his trouser zip for tiny children hasn’t stopped him becoming one of the most influential members of parliament. Here is his story. Keep in mind this man has more power over the legislation of this country than does any member of the Dail.

Mr Cohn-Bendit is better known as Dany the red of the 1968 Paris Barricades. He is a kind of mid-century leftover leftie who was active in squatting, street fighting and agitation before he re-invented himself as a Green and was elected to the European parliament. Last month I went to watch him in a debate with Declan Ganley. The thing was standing-room only in a ballroom in a Brussels hotel.


Mr Ganley produced a book Cohn-Bendit wrote in 1975. He read out Mr Cohn-Bendit`s account of how he had worked in a kindergarten and allowed the children to pull down the zip on his trousers and touch him intimately. In the book he had asked them why they wanted to play with him and not with each other, but in the end he ‘caressed’, his word- them too.

Mr Cohn-Bendit disputed none of it. Indeed when Mr Ganley finished reading, the former kindergarten teacher whooped that he had just won €500 because he had bet someone that Mr Ganley would read out that bit of his auto-biography. When Mr Cohn-Bendit’s supporters in the room did not give him quite give the sound of applause he seemed to be looking for with that reply, he changed tack and insisted that everything in the book had been discussed in Germany and France years ago and the parents of the children had never raised any concerns. Mr Ganley asked: ‘And the children, what did they say?’ Dany the Red assured him and the audience that years later the children had all said their time at the school was extremely happy. And then he went on about how attitudes were different in the 1970s.

And if none of those excuses sounds familiar to you - in particular, the excuse about how attitudes were different in the 1970s - then you weren’t paying attention last week.

But let me give you another example of how ’seriously’ the euro-elite take the protection of children. You may remember the Marc Dutroux case in Belgium. It could be called the most horrific example of child rape and murder in Europe since the war.

Known as the beast of Belgium, Dutroux is now serving a life sentence for a series of child kidnappings, rapes and murders in 1995-96. He kept some of his victims locked in a dungeon he had built in his basement. Two eight-year-old girls starved to death there after Dutroux was arrested and served a short prison sentence for car theft: his wife didn’t bother to open the dungeon door to feed the girls.

Part of the great mystery and scandal that accompanied the case was the relentless incompetence of the authorities, at that time led by the Justice Minister, Melchior Wathelet. For years, as victims were kidnapped and murdered, police files were full of reports and tip-offs that Dutroux was selling young girls. Yet Dutroux stayed free. In the end Mr Wathelet was forced to resign in disgrace. And his reward for incompetence in the administration of Justice was - to be appointed a judge at the European Court of Justice.

That would be like our chief executive of the Financial Regulator, Patrick Neary, being appointed head of NAMA. Which would be a joke. But having anyone involved in any way with the horrors of the bungled Dutroux investigation appointed to one of Europe’s most senior judicial positions is no joke. It is, however, a good measure of the arrogance of the euro-elite towards what might be called the plain people of Europe.


But still back to the elections of the European parliament. And that also takes us back to the arrogance of the euro-elite. Just in case it had slipped past you, the voters of Europe are supposed to be voting to determine the membership of the next European parliament which, under existing European law, that is to say, the Nice Treaty, will have 736 seats. But the euro-elites are manoeuvring to make the voters elect 754 MEPs - that is, to elect an extra 18 politicians to the lushly-paid parliament, even though these politicians will have no seat to fill. The euro-elite want the 18 to have full salary, full tax-free allowance for every day they turn up at the European parliament building, full expenses, business-class travel allowances and all the rest. The 18 will be given everything except a job.

The excuse given? That the Lisbon Treaty allows for the creation of an extra 18 seats. So even though the treaty is not yet ratified, the 18 extra politicians ought to be elected and paid as MEPs until the Lisbon Treaty comes into force. Note that arrogance: the treaty has not yet been ratified, and indeed,
may yet come totally off the rails if Gordon Brown is forced to call a general election in the Britain. It may never become law. Yet the euro-elite intends to ignore that fact. They expect the European voters, sheep that we are all assumed to be (and given the docility of the Irish in accepting a second referendum yet again, we have certainly proved to be sheep) to ‘baaaa-baaaa’ their way into the polling booths and deliver 754 MEPs for 736 seats.

The extra 18 are supposed to act as observers until the Lisbon Treaty comes into force, and then they will take their newly-created seats. But for technical reasons the earliest that could possibly happen is two years after the European elections. So we will have 18 politicians pouring money into their bank accounts for at least two years in return for doing no work at all as MEPs. Remember: any member of the European parliament who plays all the angles can bank €1m over the five-year term of a parliament. This euro-wheeze makes the scandal of British MPs’ expenses look like nothing worse than pilfering Biros from the stationery cupboard.

It can be a useful wheeze to us, though. It can remind us of how the idea that we - any of us, any of the voters of Europe - have ever had democratic power over Lisbon Treaty is a lie. The French and Dutch voters rejected the text when it was called the European Constitution, the Irish voters rejected the text when it was called Lisbon. The 27 member states have not finished with ratification. And yet the euro-elite have been proceeding for years as though the treaty were already law. And in their minds, of course, it is law: for European law is whatever the euro-elite say it is. Like Dutroux with the young girls, they do not consider that ‘NO’ is an available answer.

I will remind you of just a few examples of how the euro-elite have been for years seizing important new powers which were supposed to theirs only after the treaty was made law by the member states. There is the European Space Policy (which is now developing military use for the European Gallileo GPS system),the European Defence Agency, the borders agency called Frontex, and the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Each of these institutions was meant to be created only after the ratification of the European Constitution. When that collapsed, and even before it was re-packaged as the Lisbon Treaty, the euro-elite used legal trickery to start constructing these new institutions anyway.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Peter Hitchins - ultimate hypocrite

Image - Peter Hitchens with the Zambian version of Nick Griffin, Michael Sata. It appears that it is acceptable for black African people to have a Zambian Nationalist party to protect them from mass immigration but it is racist for White European British people to have a British Nationalist party that protects them from mass immigration.

Peter Hitchens is a total hypocrite.

In The Daily Mail he launches regular foam flecked attacks on the BNP, but when he goes to Africa and meets black politicians who state EXACTLY what the BNP say about mass immigration into the UK, he hugs them and gives them his puppydog look.

Hitchens it appears is just another self loathing liberal posturing in the robes of a paleo-conservative reactionary.

Read what he says here. Note his support for Mr. Sata, who indeed seems an honorable and brave man defying a repressive Zambian government that uses its corrupt police force to silence dissent and debate ;

All this has aroused the suspicions of Mr Sata, a populist politician famous for his blunt, combative manner and his harsh, biting attacks on opponents, and who was once a porter who swept the platforms at Victoria Station in London.

Now the leader of the Patriotic Front, with a respectable chance of winning a presidential election set for the end of October, Sata says:

'The Chinese are not here as investors, they are here as invaders.

'They bring Chinese to come and push wheelbarrows, they bring Chinese bricklayers, they bring Chinese carpenters, Chinese plumbers. We have plenty of those in Zambia.'

'We don't need to import labourers from China,' Sata says. 'We need to import people with skills we don't have in Zambia. The Chinese are not going to train our people in how to push wheelbarrows.'

In language which seems exaggerated, but which will later turn out to be at least partly true, he claims: 'They employ people in slave conditions.'

Add to Technorati Favorites

The True Economic Apocalypse Begins Now

The economic crisis we have seen so far is just the pre-curser to the economic apocalypse to come.

Read the articles below and realise that the role of the Corporate Media is to tell you lies in order to ensure the economic interests of those who own the Corporate Media are protected.

Therefore the Corporate Media and the politicians that they control and own will not tell you the truth, they only tell you what they want you to hear in order to get you to do what they want.

Whilst the occassional voice is allowed onto the media to tell the truth, they are marginalised by the media itself which promotes the political lies of whatever political party they support. Whilst the truth tellers telll the truth in late night shows with small audiences, the politicians get to lie on the prime time news.


Take a good, long look. You can see that from the beginning of 2007 through September of 2008, subprime loans (the gray bars above) were resetting like crazy. Those are the ones people were walking away from, sending a shockwave from defaults and foreclosures smack into the middle of the economy. Now they're gone.

The ARM market got very quiet between December 2008 and March 2009, hitting a low that won't be seen again until November of 2011. Small wonder a few "green shoots" have poked their heads above ground. But in April, resets began to increase and will reach an intermediate peak in June. After that, they tail off a little, going basically flat for the next ten months.

It's not until May of 2010 that the next wave really hits. From there to October of 2011, the resets will be coming fast and furious. That's 18 months of further turmoil in the housing market, and the beginning is still nearly a year away! (Although the months in between are likely to be no picnic, either.)

Once the carnage begins, will it be as bad as the subprime crisis? That's the $64K question. Perhaps not. For one thing, subprime loans were a much larger chunk of the market when they started going south. For another, there's been a lot of refinancing as interest rates dropped; that should help ease the default rate. And the government has massively intervened, with measures designed to prop up those who would otherwise lose their homes.

On the other hand, we're in a severe recession, which wasn't the case when the subprime crisis started. More people will be unable to meet payments. And the housing market has continued to decline, pressuring both marginal homeowners and banks that can't sell foreclosed properties.

Is the stock market's next 10/9/07 on the way? Yes. Which day will it be? That's unknowable. It could be in a week, or not for another year.

But make no mistake about it, the second crash is coming. It can't be prevented, no matter what desperate measures Obama and his hapless financial advisors come up with. All we can hope for is that, with a little luck, it won't be as severe as the first one. But it will last longer. We aren't even in the middle of the woods yet, much less on the way out.


A dire warning that the Republic is a prime candidate to go bust has come from one of the world's leading economic historians.

"The idea that countries don't go bust is a joke," said Niall Ferguson, Harvard professor and author of The Ascent of Money.

"The debt trap may be about to spring" he said, "for countries that have created large stimulus packages in order to stimulate their economies."

His chosen prime candidate to go bust is "Ireland, followed by Italy and Belgium, and UK is not too far behind".

Argentina is top of his list of shaky countries but "the argument that it can't happen in major western economies is nonsense".

Professor Ferguson believes the economists are ill qualified to analyse the current economic situation since they lack the overview of historians such as himself.

"There are economic professors in American universities who think they are masters of the universe, but they don't have any historical knowledge. I have never believed that markets are self correcting. No historian could."


Davidowitz, who is nothing if not opinionated (and colorful), paints a very grim picture: "The worst is yet to come with consumers and banks," he says. "This country is going into a 10-year decline. Living standards will never be the same."

This outlook is based on the following main points:

With the unemployment rate rising into double digits - and that's not counting the millions of "underemployed" Americans - consumers are hitting the breaks, which is having a huge impact, given consumer spending accounts for about 70% of economic activity.

Rising unemployment and the $8 trillion negative wealth effect of housing mean more Americans will default on not just mortgages but student loans and auto loans and credit card debt.

More consumer loan defaults will hit banks, which are also threatened by what
Davidowitz calls a "depression" in commercial real estate, noting the recent bankruptcy of General Growth Properties and distressed sales by Developers Diversified and other REITs.

As for all the hullabaloo about the stress tests, he says they were a sham and part of a "con game to get private money to finance these institutions because [Treasury] can't get more money from Congress. It's the ‘greater fool' theory."

"We're now in Barack Obama's world where money goes into the most inefficient parts of the economy and we're bailing everyone out," says Daviowitz, who opposes bailouts for financials and automakers alike. "The bailout money is in the sewer and gone."

Add to Technorati Favorites

Friday, 29 May 2009

The Guardian Soft On Criminals.

Compare and Contrast.

Image - criminals in stocks. They do not look too happy do they !

Image - Young offender on free holiday paid for by the tax payer. The victims of their crimes do not get free holidays to recover from their injuries caused by criminals.

When I was a child I was run over and almost killed by a drunk driver.

Being run over really, really hurts.

As a child it leaves you frightened, traumatised and changes the way you see the world.

I despise all drunk drivers.

I have also seen a drink driver swerving down the road who later on was involved in a car crash that did kill someone.

One of my old school friends who is a police officer has told me about the horrific scenes he has witnessed in crashes with drink drivers and the trauma of having to knock on a front door in the middle of the night and tell someone that their son or daughter has been killed by a drunk driver.

Yet it appears that the liberal elite are once again wanting to protect the criminals and punish the victims.

The Guardian Newspaper have just rang me about the blog article that I published here ( link below) where I stated that the video film of a drunk driving criminal on The Telegraph website, who was thrashed by the police after almost killing a police officer, pedestrians and other road users whilst driving like a maniac through the streets, was the best video I had seen so far this year.

Watch the video.

Note how close the car comes to killing the officer in the video at the start of the video.

Imagine if that was your father, your son or your brother.

In the statement I gave to the Guardian I stated that the criminal justice system today serves the interests only of the criminals and not the victims.

The entire contemporary criminal justice system is predicated upon what the writer Henry Buckle stated ;

“Society prepares the crime, the criminal commits it”

This is the basis of the liberal criminal justice system. They really do believe that the real victims are the criminals, not the victims of the criminals.

I believe that regardless of what colour you are, what nation you live in, what socio-economic background you are from - the moment you drink and drive you deserve to be given a good thrashing off of the police when they arrest you.

The Guardian, in a typical slimy fashion asked me if I found the video funny as the man being beaten was black.

I responded that every drink driver regardless of race deserves a good threashing and that I would find them all equally funny.

I am an equal opportunities champion who believes that race should be no bar to a good thrashing off of the police if you are caught drink driving and nearly killing people.

Today the courts will not punish criminals, especially if they are rich and can hire some hot shot lawyer who will get them off in exchange for a nice fat cheque.

There is never an excuse to drink and drive - those that do are scum.

I want to see such people get the justice they do not get from the courts and the legal system, which in an ideal world would involve a good beating off of the Police if they find you drunk at the wheel of a car.

A few shocks from a taser once they drag you out of the car and realise that you are pissed out of your brain would stop you doing it again.

If our society were willing to punish drink drivers and criminals instead of letting them off with a slap on the wrist or a fine then our society would be a far safer place for us, and our children, to live in.

I believe that the courts and the criminal justice system have completely misunderstood what motivates people not to commit crimes.

It is fear of being caught and fear of punishment.

The liberal system is so insipid and weak that criminals laugh at it. They see prison as a holiday not punishment.

At the moment there is a high chance criminals will not be caught and even if they are they are not punished for their crimes.

Prisons should therefore stop being holiday camps and become punishment camps.

Society must protect itself.

What works is fear and humiliation.

Those who are convicted of anti-social behaviour should be put in the stocks and have rotten eggs and vegetables thrown at them - instead they are paraded before an endless succession of social workers, probation officers, psychologists etc who are in the grip of liberalism.

It would also be a hell of a lot cheaper than the holidays, hearings, appeals and day trips to Alton Towers that masquerade as 'punishment' today.

Criminals are not punished, they are 'sympathised with'.

We need those who are sentenced to community punishments to be forced to wear pink tutus and pop socks or other absurd attire when they sweep the streets so they can be mocked by passers by.

At the moment the wearing of an electronic tag in our communities is not seen as something to be ashamed of, it seen as a badge of pride.

Those who commit crimes gain kudos and respect from criminals and people in their communities, whilst those who work with the police to deal with anti-social behaviour in their communities are called 'grasses' and attacked and intimidated in their own homes.

Crime has become glamorous as a result of the media glamourising crime, from the Krays to O.J. Simpson.

The media and the liberal values it pumps out, and the way it glamorises criminals in our society, means that criminals are not reviled or despised - they are feted and adored.

What works is humiliation and ostracisation.

If criminals and thugs were forced to wear absurd clothes that totally humilate them when they are on community service in the streets then the status of criminals in our society and their communities would be relegated to a laughing stock instead of them being respected.

We should bring back corporal punishment and capital punishment.

We need the stocks and the cane and the rope for terrorists, paedophiles and serial killers.

The liberal jstice system has totally failed.

Crime is endemic and out of control.

We are inundated with foreign crime gangs and our own domestic criminals, and the liberals keep on using the same failed solutions to stem the ever rising tide of criminality.

I stand up for the victims, not the criminals.

That is the legacy of what happened to me as a child - a remnant of the horrific memory of watching the front of that car draw closer and closer to me and then the shock of the impact.

Add to Technorati Favorites

John Pilger - bang on target.

Britain: the depth of corruption

28 May 2009

In his latest column for the New Statesman, John Pilger describes how the current scandal of MPs' tax evasion and phantom mortgages conceals a deeper corruption that is traced back to the political monoculture of the United States.

The theft of public money by members of parliament, including government ministers, has given Britons a rare glimpse inside the tent of power and privilege. It is rare because not one political reporter or commentator, those who fill tombstones of column inches and dominate broadcast journalism, revealed a shred of this scandal. It was left to a public relations man to sell the “leak”. Why?

The answer lies in a deeper corruption, which tales of tax evasion and phantom mortgages touch upon but also conceal. Since Margaret Thatcher, British parliamentary democracy has been progressively destroyed as the two main parties have converged into a single-ideology business state, each with almost identical social, economic and foreign policies. This “project” was completed by Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, inspired by the political monoculture of the United States. That so many Labour and Tory politicians are now revealed as personally crooked is no more than a metaphor for the anti-democratic system they have forged together.

Their accomplices have been those journalists who report Parliament as "lobby correspondents" and their editors, who have “played the game” wilfully, and have deluded the public (and sometimes themselves) that vital, democratic differences exist between the parties. Media-designed opinion polls based on absurdly small samplings, along with a tsunami of comment on personalities and their specious crises, have reduced the “national conversation” to a series of media events, in which the withdrawal of popular consent – as the historically low electoral turnouts under Blair demonstrated – has been abused as apathy.

Having fixed the boundaries of political debate and possibility, self-important paladins, notably liberals, promoted the naked emperor Blair and championed his “values” that would allow “the mind [to] range in search of a better Britain”. And when the bloodstains showed, they ran for cover. All of it had been, as Larry David once described an erstwhile crony, “a babbling brook of bullshit”.

How contrite their former heroes now seem. On 17 May, the Leader of the House of Commons, Harriet Harman, who is alleged to have spent £10,000 of taxpayers’ money on “media training”, called on MPs to “rebuild cross-party trust”. The unintended irony of her words recalls one of her first acts as social security secretary more than a decade ago – cutting the benefits of single mothers. This was spun and reported as if there was a “revolt” among Labour backbenchers, which was false. None of Blair’s new female MPs, who had been elected “to end male-dominated, Conservative policies”, spoke up against this attack on the poorest of poor women. All voted for it.

The same was true of the lawless attack on Iraq in 2003, behind which the cross-party Establishment and the political media rallied. Andrew Marr stood in Downing Street and excitedly told BBC viewers that Blair had “said they would be able to take Baghdad without a bloodbath, and that in the end the Iraqis would be celebrating. And on both of those points he has been proved conclusively right.” When Blair’s army finally retreated from Basra in May, it left behind, according to scholarly estimates, more than a million people dead, a majority of stricken, sick children, a contaminated water supply, a crippled energy grid and four million refugees.

As for the “celebrating” Iraqis, the vast majority, say Whitehall’s own surveys, want the invader out. And when Blair finally departed the House of Commons, MPs gave him a standing ovation – they who had refused to hold a vote on his criminal invasion or even to set up an inquiry into its lies, which almost three-quarters of the British population wanted.

Such venality goes far beyond the greed of the uppity Hazel Blears.

“Normalising the unthinkable”, Edward Herman’s phrase from his essay The Banality of Evil, about the division of labour in state crime, is applicable here. On 18 May, the Guardian devoted the top of one page to a report headlined, “Blair awarded $1m prize for international relations work”. This prize, announced in Israel soon after the Gaza massacre, was for his “cultural and social impact on the world”. You looked in vain for evidence of a spoof or some recognition of the truth. Instead, there was his “optimism about the chance of bringing peace” and his work “designed to forge peace”.

This was the same Blair who committed the same crime – deliberately planning the invasion of a country, “the supreme international crime” – for which the Nazi foreign minister Joachim von Ribbentrop was hanged at Nuremberg after proof of his guilt was located in German cabinet documents. Last February, Britain’s “Justice” Secretary, Jack Straw, blocked publication of crucial cabinet minutes from March 2003 about the planning of the invasion of Iraq, even though the Information Commissioner, Richard Thomas, has ordered their release. For Blair, the unthinkable is both normalised and celebrated.

“How our corrupt MPs are playing into the hands of extremists,” said the cover of last week’s New Statesman. But is not their support for the epic crime in Iraq already extremism? And for the murderous imperial adventure in Afghanistan? And for the government’s collusion with torture?

It is as if our public language has finally become Orwellian. Using totalitarian laws approved by a majority of MPs, the police have set up secretive units to combat democratic dissent they call “extremism”. Their de facto partners are “security” journalists, a recent breed of state or “lobby” propagandist. On 9 April, the BBC’s Newsnight programme promoted the guilt of 12 “terrorists” arrested in a contrived media drama orchestrated by the Prime Minister himself. All were later released without charge.

Something is changing in Britain that gives cause for optimism. The British people have probably never been more politically aware and prepared to clear out decrepit myths and other rubbish while stepping angrily over the babbling brook of bullshit.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Thursday, 28 May 2009


What people have not realised is that the leaked MP expenses that are being published by The Telegraph is just one years worth of expenses, those of 2008.

What we demand is that the expenses of every MP for every year that they have been in office are published so that we can see just how much has been spent and on what and by whom over recent decades.

The fact that just one years worth of expenses have been released is not enough - we demand full disclosure of all their expenses since they have been in office.

So come on - lets get all the data revealed and without it being censored by the pigs themelves.


Add to Technorati Favorites

Open Door Britain

This is why you need to vote BNP - to make sure the doors to Britain are shut.

Thursday May 28,2009

By Mark Reynolds BRITAIN’S new paperwork system for allowing temporary entry for visitors is a major security concern, claims an immigration officer who has spent 17 years checking visas at Heathrow.

Mike Whiting – a retired chief immigration officer with 38 years’ experience at the UK Immigration Service – turned whistleblower yesterday, alleging cost-cutting within the new UK Border Force means the loss of vital ­face-to-face interviews with visa applicants, resulting in an “open door” immigration policy.

He said: “By losing personal interviews you are losing the personal touch.

“The system is much more open to abuse now when you are dealing only with documents in countries where it is easy to obtain forgeries.

“On the one hand, the new system seems like a much more stringent approach because more documents are required, but on the other, applicants are not faced by an experienced entry officer who can question them on their background.

“In those days when people with visas arrived at a port or airport an immigration officer would still question them.

“But nowadays the emphasis is not on having a second bite of the cherry unless someone really stands out. The emphasis is to get them through quickly.”

This inevitably leads to security concerns, he said.

“My view is shared by those who have recently retired and have a number of years experience within the service and know what the old system is like.

“With the large numbers of people wanting to come here maybe you can’t go back to the old system. But certainly from a security point of view the loss of the personal interview is a concern.”

Mr Whiting, 59, spent four years as an entry clearance officer in Mumbai, India, where he and other British-based staff would interview almost all applicants, particularly students.


He said: “On the subcontinent there is such a problem with forged documents and you can’t take things at face value. You can only find out whether an application is genuine or not by talking to them.

“Not that we got everything right back then – it was far from a perfect system. But you feel now that because the majority of it is done on a tick-box system, it is an open-door policy.

“What they are tending to do abroad now is to centralise things to cut costs. In India there were four district centres for UK Immigration: Chennai, Calcutta, Delhi and Mumbai. But now it is all done through Delhi, meaning face-to-face interviews are a logistical nightmare.”

Speaking at home in Fetcham, Leatherhead, Surrey, semi-retired Mr Whiting said he also had concerns about the recent creation of the UK Border Force.

He said: “Previously you had Immigration officers and Customs officers working completely separately but now they all come under the same banner.

“A lot of very senior Immigration officials were pensioned off and replaced by customs workers who, with the best will in the world, do not have long-term knowledge of immigration work.”

A Home Offi ce spokesperson said: “Britain’s border is stronger than ever. Fingerprint visas mean we can check everyone who wants to come to the UK against immigration and crime databases.

“These checks are a crucial part of securing the border and they have already detected at least 5,000 false identities.

“Fingerprint visas make up one part of Britain’s triple ring of security, alongside hi-tech watchlist checks at the border and ID cards for foreign nationals and work alongside the tough new rules of the points-based system to protect Britain's border."

Add to Technorati Favorites

Nick Mason Pink Floyd Rich Pig Scum

Image - Nick Mason who allegedly has an extremely small micro-penis with his penis substitute big red shiny car that goes vroom vroom.


The very fact that Nick Mason of Pink Floyd has over 1.5 million pounds to spend on a single car whilst British families are going homeless, British workers are losing their jobs and British workers wages are being cut is obscene.

This fat, middle class parasite who gained his wealth from sitting on his fat arse banging sticks on a cymbal is evidence of the utter depravity of contemporary British society.

Under New Labour rich middle class arseholes like Nick Mason and Billy Bragg grew rich whilst the poor grew poorer.

Now they are banding together to defend the Labour Party that impoverished the poor and enriched the rich.

The basic wage for a fully qualified Staff Nurse (RN) in the UK with 3 years University training is £20,225.

Yet this fat fucking useless prick sits on his fat arse and makes millions per year on royalty payments alone.

You can either continue to subsidise the disgusting lifestyle of this fat idiot by buying Pink Floyd albums or you can not buy them at all in the first place.

The choice, as always, is yours.

Though personally I must say that I hate Billy Bragg the ultimate mockney as he is a totally shit singer, I despise Blur who are a bunch of whining pussys who wrote mockney songs whilst in reality were all middle class mummys boys and I still think Pink Floyd are crap as their music is now just ancient middle class shite for middle class tossers who like their music like themselves - ancient, boring and outdated.

All in all, Pink Floyd became just another brick in the Establishments wall, a fake plastic icon of rebellion and hard rock nostalgia for the sweet paralysed.

As Richey Edwards wrote in the song Nostalgic Pushead ;

They dig the new scene and their parties
Where stonehenge is worshipped and drugs a deity
Vicarious thrills re-run their youth
We follow we have no voice the dead
Radio nostalgia is radio death
I wanna cover diamonds on my wife
Hardrock nostalgia the Stones on CD
Tranquilised icons for the sweet paralysed.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Blur Mockneys Attack BNP

Image - non-entity nerd from Blur shakes hand with war criminal.

The idiot from the band Blur, David Alexander De Horne Rowntree, has attacked the BNP.

Yet another middle class Champagne Socialist 'rock star' arsehole with too many millions to spend who likes to pretend they are 'mockney' working for the working class.

Lets take a look at this Labour Toff ;

Rowntree was born to musical parents — Susan, a viola player, and John, a sound engineer at the British Broadcasting Corporation. He attended the Gilberd School, Colchester during the week, and the Landermere Music School, Earls Colne, at weekends, where he studied percussion. After leaving school he studied for a Higher National Diploma (HND) in Computer Science at Thames Polytechnic [1], and started his career as a computer programmer for Colchester Borough Council.

Rowntree has been a keen activist and supporter of the Labour Party since becoming a member in 2002, and is chair of London's West End branch. In April 2007 he unsuccessfully contested the safe Conservative seat of Marylebone High Street on Westminster City Council. In July 2008 he fought the safe Labour seat of Church Street, a Labour stronghold since its creation in the 1960s, but was again unsuccessful as the Conservatives gained the seat.

In February 2008 he was selected by the Cities of London and Westminster Constituency Labour Party to stand against Conservative MP Mark Field at the next general election.

Rowntree spoke out about the 2003 invasion of Iraq and in 2007 said, "I’m not a pacifist, I do believe that some things are worth fighting for, and dying for. I understand that that’s easier to say, I’m not being the one who’s asked to die, but Saddam was such an illegal ruthless bastard I didn’t shed any tears for it [the war]."[5]

What a typical middle class mockney twat.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Daily Mail, The Times, Searchlight Lies Caught Out

Yet again the Corporate Media have been caught out telling lies to the public about the BNP.

The Daily Mail, The Times and Searchlight have all stated that the Electoral Commission have begun an 'investigation' or an 'inquiry' into the allegations made by themselves about a five thousand pound donation to Nick Griffin passed to the Solidarity trades union.

I rang the Electoral Commission and they have confirmed that there is no investigation, there is no inquiry and that they are not planning any investigation.

The role of the Electoral Commission is to investigate donations passed too a political party, not donations made to a private individual when then passed at donation to a trades union.

The Electoral Commission have no power in law to investigate anything other than what they are empowered under legislation to investigate.

Ring them up for yourself on 02072710500 and they will confirm that the media are making up complete bullshit.

This is simply another lie in the long list of lies told by a desperate Corporate Media who are trying to force the failed political pigs of the Tories, Lib Dems, Labour and UKIP onto the British public in the forthcoming European Elections.

Yet again the main tabloids have listened to Searchlight's lies and then printed them on their pages.

What a bunch of total idiots.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Searchlight Lies Continue

Searchlight say 6500 e mail complaints have been sent.

The company say they have received 100.

Now who do we believe ? Hmmmmmmmmm

Clear Channel under pressure over BNP ads

Source: Marketing Week | Author: Mary-Louise Clews | Published: 28 May 2009 10:30

Clear Channel outdoorOutdoor media owner Clear Channel has been deluged with letters calling on it to ditch its deal to carry British National Party European election campaign posters, according to anti-racism campaigners.

Campaign group Searchlight says over 4,000 letters were sent to the company by its supporters over the bank holiday weekend, and it was less than 500 letters short of its 7,000 target this morning (May 28).
Banner Ad

The group and its supporters are targeting the media owner for profiting from ‘racist propaganda’ by selling poster sites to the far right party.

It says it has yet to receive a response from Clear Channel, and its next step could be to approach commercial clients about their association with the billboard company if it maintains its silence.

However a Clear Channel spokeswoman says it have responded to each letter sent quoting its policy on political party advertising. She also questions campaigners’ claims over the numbers of complaints, claiming it has received “less than one hundred” letters.

The policy says the laws governing political advertising “allow legal and legitimate political parties to engage in campaigning and maintain free speech”, and that it will accept advertising from such parties without “bias or favour, regardless of the company’s own views.”

It adds it is not for clear Channel to “censor” such messages if they are legal, or “ bow to pressure from lobby groups and activists.”

Add to Technorati Favorites

Manchester Evening News - Guardian Front Paper

Image - Manchester Evening News - another Corporate Media owned rag that masquerades as part of the Free Press.

The Manchester Evening News is once again attacking the BNP.

The MEN is not an objective and independent newspaper.

It is just another Corporate Media Rag.

It is fact owned by the Guardian Media Group, which includes the Observer, it has widespread financial interests in digital media, radio, TV, car-sales magazines and a string of weekly newspapers.

Therefore we are proud to be attacked in the media by any dogs that work for The Guardian and its Labour supporting rags.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Fag Hag Attacks BNP

Image - Eddie Izzard says, 'Dont vote BNP or I will bum you'.

Eddie Izzard, another self important, pompous, 'socialist' multi-millionaire, proffessional idiot and Labour Party member says dont vote BNP.


The idea we ever become 'attractive' as a political party to rich fag hags like Izzard is the day we implode as a political movement.

Lets see Izzard go to Pakistan dressed as a fairy and act like a mincer under Islamism.

Naaah, thought not.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Whining Crap ex-Rock Stars and the BNP

It appears that a few crap ex-rock stars led by members of Blur and Pink Floyd, hardly noted for contemporary chart success, are doing their best to support Billy Bragg and his latest fiendish plot to destroy the BNP via asking over privileged, undeserving, dickheads who once sung a few songs to demand they have a right not to allow their songs on BNP produced albums.

Personally, I agree with them.

Why we are funding these dickheads with our cash I do not know.

Better we release albums from nationalists for a nationalist audience rather than subsidise these parasites who made their money out an industry that is one of the most debased and degenerate on the planet.

We live in strange times.

Just because someone has the ability to write a few songs, does not make one an individual whose views on politics are worth listening too.

The era of the Geldoffs, Bono's and Billy Braggs when rock and pop music 'did politics' was the most monstrous egotistical moment in the evolution of music.

People mock the pompous progressive rock bands like Yes and Emerson Lake and Palmer as the bands that defined excess, arrogance, ego and pomposity in contemporary music - but in reality the real pompous arseholes in rock music were, and still are, all those rich, idiotic, drunken, druggie rock stars that thought that selling a few albums to the dickheads that bought them meant that they should also be regarded as gods of politics as well as gods of rock.

When Spinal Tap got political - that was the real farce.

There is nothing more idiotic and hypocritical than a multi-millionaire rock star pontificating about socialism, world poverty and multi-culturalism from a castle, a mansion in a 100 % whites only part of Dorset or from a massive farm in Shropshire.

The only real rock stars are dead.

If they live over 40 they are plastics.

Add to Technorati Favorites

The Times and the Reds

Image - Rupert Murdoch crying into his champagne that latest BNP smear attempt failed.

HO HO HO - screw you Rupert Murdoch and screw The Times.

Not only did Nick Griffon suss you out, he used the money you tried to illegally donate to the BNP to support Solidarity legal cases to support persecuted nationalists.

Then, to cap it all, you go and give the BNP a front page story whilst the BNP website runs the facts and kills the story.

Brilliant. Thanks you grubby twats.

P.S. I just love the confirmation the entire corporatocracy and the corporate media despise the BNP.

Note the fact that the ONLY political party the entire Establishment are against are the BNP.

Proof indeed that we are the only real opposition party in the UK.

Hi Ho Hi Ho Its Off To Brussels We Go !

P.S Heres some info on Tony Blair and Rupert Murdoch.

The question is why does this American who is not even British have so much power over the media in the UK ?

The first thing we will do is ensure that media groups in the UK can only be owned by British citizens, as that way they can be held liable for the lies they print in their papers.

Note that Murdoch was informed by Blair about the Iraq War before it began, and before Parliament or the British people, so that Murdochs papers The Sun and Times could print lies in its pages to support Blairs plans for war.

It was The Sun and The Times that printed and propagandised the dodgy dossier with its bullshit about WMD and it was the corporate media that beat the drum for the Iraq War.

The Corporate Media are as guilty as the politicians that voted for the Iraq War for the war crimes committed during the Iraq War.

Murdoch knew even before the British soldiers who would be sent to die in Iraq, the British Parliament and the British people.

That is not a democracy, that is a conspiracy.


Rupert Murdoch

Tony Blair's close relationship with Rupert Murdoch, and the reciprocated unprecedented support which he received from Murdoch's globally influential News Corporation media empire, has been the subject of much criticism.[89][90] In 1995 while leader of the Opposition, Blair disclosed in Commons register of interests that he was a guest of Murdoch when he flew to meet him in Hayman Island.[91]

Contacts with UK media proprietors

A Cabinet Office freedom of information response, released the day after Blair handed over power to Gordon Brown, documents Blair having various official phone calls and meetings with Rupert Murdoch of News Corporation and Richard Desmond of Northern and Shell Media.[92]

The response includes contacts "clearly of an official nature" in the specified period, but excludes contacts "not clearly of an official nature."[93] No details were given of what subjects discussed. In the period between September 2002 and April 2005, Blair and Murdoch are documented speaking 6 times; three times in the 9 days before the Iraq war, including the eve of the 20 March US and UK invasion, and on 29 January, 25 April and 3 October 2004. Between January 2003 and February 2004, Mr Blair had three meetings with Richard Desmond; on 29 January and 3 September 2003 and 23 February 2004.[94][95]

The information was disclosed after a three and a half year battle by the Lib Dem Lord Avebury.[92] Lord Avebury's initial October 2003 information request was dismissed by then leader of the Lords, Baroness Amos.[92] A following complaint was rejected, with Downing Street claiming the information compromised free and frank discussions, while Cabinet Office claimed releasing the timing of the PM's contacts with individuals is undesirable, as it might lead to the content of the discussions being disclosed.[92] While awaiting a following appeal from Lord Avebury, the cabinet office announced that it would release the information. Lord Avebury said: "The public can now scrutinise the timing of his (Murdoch's) contacts with the former Prime Minister, to see whether they can be linked to events in the outside world."[92]

Add to Technorati Favorites

Wednesday, 27 May 2009

The Bilderberger Agenda 2009

The Bilderberg Plan for 2009: Remaking the Global Political Economy

by Andrew G. Marshall

Global Research, May 26, 2009

Email this article to a friend
Print this article

From May 14-17, the global elite met in secret in Greece for the yearly Bilderberg conference, amid scattered and limited global media attention. Roughly 130 of the world’s most powerful individuals came together to discuss the pressing issues of today, and to chart a course for the next year. The main topic of discussion at this years meeting was the global financial crisis, which is no surprise, considering the list of conference attendees includes many of the primary architects of the crisis, as well as those poised to “solve” it.

The Agenda: The Restructuring of the Global Political Economy

Before the meeting began, Bilderberg investigative journalist Daniel Estulin reported on the main item of the agenda, which was leaked to him by his sources inside. Though such reports cannot be verified, his sources, along with those of veteran Bilderberg tracker, Jim Tucker, have proven to be shockingly accurate in the past. Apparently, the main topic of discussion at this years meeting was to address the economic crisis, in terms of undertaking, “Either a prolonged, agonizing depression that dooms the world to decades of stagnation, decline and poverty ... or an intense-but-shorter depression that paves the way for a new sustainable economic world order, with less sovereignty but more efficiency.” Other items on the agenda included a plan to “continue to deceive millions of savers and investors who believe the hype about the supposed up-turn in the economy. They are about to be set up for massive losses and searing financial pain in the months ahead,” and “There will be a final push for the enactment of Lisbon Treaty, pending on Irish voting YES on the treaty in Sept or October,”[1] which would give the European Union massive powers over its member nations, essentially making it a supranational regional government, with each country relegated to more of a provincial status.

Shortly after the meetings began, Bilderberg tracker Jim Tucker reported that his inside sources revealed that the group has on its agenda, “the plan for a global department of health, a global treasury and a shortened depression rather than a longer economic downturn.” Tucker reported that Swedish Foreign Minister and former Prime Minister, Carl Bildt, “Made a speech advocating turning the World Health Organization into a world department of health, advocating turning the IMF into a world department of treasury, both of course under the auspices of the United Nations.” Further, Tucker reported that, “Treasury Secretary Geithner and Carl Bildt touted a shorter recession not a 10-year recession ... partly because a 10 year recession would damage Bilderberg industrialists themselves, as much as they want to have a global department of labor and a global department of treasury, they still like making money and such a long recession would cost them big bucks industrially because nobody is buying their toys.....the tilt is towards keeping it short.”[2]

After the meetings finished, Daniel Estulin reported that, “One of Bilderberg’s primary concerns according to Estulin is the danger that their zeal to reshape the world by engineering chaos in order to implement their long term agenda could cause the situation to spiral out of control and eventually lead to a scenario where Bilderberg and the global elite in general are overwhelmed by events and end up losing their control over the planet.”[3]

On May 21, the Macedonian International News Agency reported that, “A new Kremlin report on the shadowy Bilderberg Group, who this past week held their annual meeting in Greece, states that the West’s financial, political and corporate elite emerged from their conclave after coming to an agreement that in order to continue their drive towards a New World Order dominated by the Western Powers, the US Dollar has to be ‘totally’ destroyed.” Further, the same Kremlin report apparently stated that, “most of the West’s wealthiest elite convened at an unprecedented secret meeting in New York called for and led by” David Rockefeller, “to plot the demise of the US Dollar.”[4]

The Secret Meeting of Billionaires

The meeting being referred to was a secret meeting where, “A dozen of the richest people in the world met for an unprecedented private gathering at the invitation of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett to talk about giving away money,” held at Rockefeller University, and included notable philanthropists such as Gates, Buffett, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, George Soros, Eli Broad, Oprah Winfrey, David Rockefeller Sr. and Ted Turner. One attendee stated that, “It wasn’t secret,” but that, “It was meant to be a gathering among friends and colleagues. It was something folks have been discussing for a long time. Bill and Warren hoped to do this occasionally. They sent out an invite and people came.” Chronicle of Philanthropy editor Stacy Palmer said, “Given how serious these economic times are, I don't think it's surprising these philanthropists came together,” and that, “They don't typically get together and ask each other for advice.” The three hosts of the meeting were Buffet, Gates and David Rockefeller.[5] [See: Appendix 2: Bilderberg Connections to the Billionaire’s Meeting].

Bilderberg founding member David Rockefeller, Honourary Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, Honourary Chairman and Founder of the Trilateral Commission, Chairman of the Council of the Americas and the Americas Society, former Chairman and CEO of Chase Manhattan.

At the meeting, “participants steadfastly refused to reveal the content of the discussion. Some cited an agreement to keep the meeting confidential. Spokesmen for Mr. Buffett, Mr. Bloomberg, Mr. Gates, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Soros and Ms. Winfrey and others dutifully declined comment, though some confirmed attendance.”[6] Reports indicate that, “They discussed how to address the global slump and expand their charitable activities in the downturn.”[7]

The UK newspaper The Times reported that these “leading billionaires have met secretly to consider how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population,” and that they “discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change.” Interestingly, “The informal afternoon session was so discreet that some of the billionaires’ aides were told they were at ‘security briefings’.” Further, “The billionaires were each given 15 minutes to present their favourite cause. Over dinner they discussed how they might settle on an ‘umbrella cause’ that could harness their interests,” and what was decided upon was that, “they agreed that overpopulation was a priority.” Ultimately, “a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat,” and that, “They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming.” One guest at the meeting said that, “They wanted to speak rich to rich without worrying anything they said would end up in the newspapers, painting them as an alternative world government.”[8]

The Leaked Report

Bilderberg investigative reporter Daniel Estulin reportedly received from his inside sources a 73-page Bilderberg Group meeting wrap-up for participants, which revealed that there were some serious disagreements among the participants. “The hardliners are for dramatic decline and a severe, short-term depression, but there are those who think that things have gone too far and that the fallout from the global economic cataclysm cannot be accurately calculated if Henry Kissinger's model is chosen. Among them is Richard Holbrooke. What is unknown at this point: if Holbrooke's point of view is, in fact, Obama's.” The consensus view was that the recession would get worse, and that recovery would be “relatively slow and protracted,” and to look for these terms in the press over the next weeks and months.

Estulin reported, “that some leading European bankers faced with the specter of their own financial mortality are extremely concerned, calling this high wire act "unsustainable," and saying that US budget and trade deficits could result in the demise of the dollar.” One Bilderberger said that, “the banks themselves don't know the answer to when (the bottom will be hit).” Everyone appeared to agree, “that the level of capital needed for the American banks may be considerably higher than the US government suggested through their recent stress tests.” Further, “someone from the IMF pointed out that its own study on historical recessions suggests that the US is only a third of the way through this current one; therefore economies expecting to recover with resurgence in demand from the US will have a long wait.” One attendee stated that, “Equity losses in 2008 were worse than those of 1929,” and that, “The next phase of the economic decline will also be worse than the '30s, mostly because the US economy carries about $20 trillion of excess debt. Until that debt is eliminated, the idea of a healthy boom is a mirage.”[9]

According to Jim Tucker, Bilderberg is working on setting up a summit in Israel from June 8-11, where “the world’s leading regulatory experts” can “address the current economic situation in one forum.” In regards to the proposals put forward by Carl Bildt to create a world treasury department and world department of health under the United Nations, the IMF is said to become the World Treasury, while the World Health Organization is to become the world department of health. Bildt also reaffirmed using “climate change” as a key challenge to pursue Bilderberg goals, referring to the economic crisis as a “once-in-a-generation crisis while global warming is a once-in-a-millennium challenge.” Bildt also advocated expanding NAFTA through the Western hemisphere to create an American Union, using the EU as a “model of integration.”

The IMF reportedly sent a report to Bilderberg advocating its rise to becoming the World Treasury Department, and “U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner enthusiastically endorsed the plan for a World Treasury Department, although he received no assurance that he would become its leader.” Geithner further said, “Our hope is that we can work with Europe on a global framework, a global infrastructure which has appropriate global oversight.”[10]

Bilderberg’s Plan in Action?

Reorganizing the Federal Reserve

Following the Bilderberg meeting, there were several interesting announcements made by key participants, specifically in regards to reorganizing the Federal Reserve. On May 21, it was reported that US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner “is believed to be leaning heavily towards giving the Federal Reserve a central role in future regulation,” and “it is understood that the Fed would take on some of the work currently undertaken by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.”[11]

On Wednesday, May 20, Geithner spoke before the Senate Banking Committee, at which he stated that, “there are important indications that our financial system is starting to heal.” In regards to regulating the financial system, Geithner stated that, “we must ensure that international rules for financial regulation are consistent with the high standards we will be implementing in the United States.”[12]

US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Bloomberg reported that, “The Obama administration may call for stripping the Securities and Exchange Commission of some of its powers under a regulatory reorganization,” and that, “The proposal, still being drafted, is likely to give the Federal Reserve more authority to supervise financial firms deemed too big to fail. The Fed may inherit some SEC functions, with others going to other agencies.” Interestingly, “SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro’s agency has been mostly absent from negotiations within the administration on the regulatory overhaul, and she has expressed frustration about not being consulted.”

It was reported that “Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was set to discuss proposals to change financial regulations last night at a dinner with National Economic Council Director Lawrence Summers [who was also present at Bilderberg], former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker [also at Bilderberg], ex-SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt and Elizabeth Warren, the Harvard University law professor who heads the congressional watchdog group for the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program.”[13] The Federal Reserve is a privately owned central bank, owned by its shareholders, consisting of the major banks the make up each regional Fed bank (the largest of which is JP Morgan Chase and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York). This plan would essentially give a privately owned bank, which has governmental authority, the ability to regulate the banks that own it. It’s the equivalent of getting a Colonel to guard a General to whom he is directly answerable. Talk about the fox guarding the hen house. It is literally granting ownership over the financial regulator to the banks being regulated.

As Market Watch, an online publication of the Wall Street Journal, reported, “The Federal Reserve, created nearly 100 years ago in the aftermath of a financial panic, could be transformed into a different agency as the Obama administration reinvents the way government interacts with the financial system.” Referring to Geithner’s Senate appearance, it was reported that, “Geithner was also grilled on the cozy relationships that exist between the big banks and the regional Federal Reserve banks. Before Geithner joined the administration, he was president of the New York Fed, which is a strange public-private hybrid institution that is actually owned and run by the banks.” In response, “Geithner insisted that the private banks have no say over the policies of the New York Fed, but he acknowledged that the banks do have a say in hiring the president, who does make policy. The chairman of the New York Fed, Stephen Friedman, was forced to resign earlier this month because of perceived conflicts of interest due to his large holdings in Goldman Sachs.”[14]

The IMF as a Global Treasury

The Bilderberg agenda of creating a global treasury has already been started prior to the Bilderberg meeting, with decisions made during the G20 financial summit in April. Although the G20 seemed to frame it more in context of being formed into a global central bank, although it is likely the IMF could fill both roles.

Following the G20 meeting at the beginning of April, 2009, it was reported that, “The world is a step closer to a global currency, backed by a global central bank, running monetary policy for all humanity,” as the Communiqué released by the G20 leaders stated that, “We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250bn (£170bn) into the world economy and increase global liquidity,” and that, “SDRs are Special Drawing Rights, a synthetic paper currency issued by the International Monetary Fund that has lain dormant for half a century.” Essentially, “they are putting a de facto world currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body.”[15] [See Appendix 2: Creating a Central Bank of the World]

Following the Bilderberg meeting, “President Obama has asked Congress to authorize $100 billion in loans to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to help create a $500 billion global bailout fund,” which would give the IMF the essential prerogative of a global treasury, providing bailouts for countries in need around the world. Further, “the bill would allow the IMF to borrow up to $100 billion from the U.S. and increase the U.S. fiscal contribution to the IMF by $8 billion.” Elaborating on the program, it was reported that, “World leaders began on the global bailout initiative, called the New Arrangement for Borrowing (NAB), at the G-20 summit in early April. The president agreed at that time to make the additional funds available.” Obama wrote that, “Treasury Secretary Geithner concluded that the size of the NAB is woefully inadequate to deal with the type of severe economic and financial crisis we are experiencing, and I agree with him.”[16]

With the G20 decision to increase the usage of IMF Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), forming a de facto world currency, it was recently reported that, “Sub-Saharan Africa will receive around $10 billion from the IMF in Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) to help its economies weather the global financial crisis,” and that, “As part of a $1.1 trillion deal to combat the world economic downturn agreed at April's G20 summit, the IMF will issue $250 billion worth of SDRs, which can be used to boost foreign currency reserves.”[17]

Recent reports have also indicated that the IMF’s role in issuing SDRs goes hand in hand with the Bilderberg discussion on the potential collapse of the US dollar, and, “Transforming the dollar standard into an SDR-based system would be a major break with a policy that has lasted more than 60 years.” It was reported that, “There are two ways in which the dollar’s role in the international monetary system can be reduced. One possibility is a gradual, market-determined erosion of the dollar as a reserve currency in favor of the euro. But, while the euro’s international role – especially its use in financial markets – has increased since its inception, it is hard to envisage it overtaking the dollar as the dominant reserve currency in the foreseeable future.” However, “With the dollar’s hegemony unlikely to be seriously undermined by market forces, at least in the short and medium-term, the only way to bring about a major reduction in its role as a reserve currency is by international agreement.” This is where the SDRs come into play, as “One way to make the SDR the major reserve currency relatively soon would be to create and allocate a massive amount of new SDRs to the IMF’s members.”[18] This is, interestingly, exactly what is happening with Africa and the IMF now.

Former IMF Managing Director Jacques de Larosière recently stated that the current financial crisis, “given its scope, presents a unique opening to improve institutions, and there is already a danger that the chance might be missed if the different actors cannot agree to changes by the time economic growth resumes.” He is now an adviser with BNP Paribas, a corporation highly represented at Bilderberg meetings, and he was head of the Treasury of France when Valéry Giscard d’Estaing was President of France, who is a regular of the Bilderberg Group.[19]

The Guardian Covers Bilderberg

The British paper, the Guardian, was the only major mainstream news publication to provide ongoing coverage of the Bilderberg meeting over the weekend. His first columns were satirical and slightly mocking, referring to it as, “A long weekend at a luxury hotel, where the world's elite get to shake hands, clink glasses, fine-tune their global agenda and squabble over who gets the best sun loungers. I'm guessing that Henry Kissinger brings his own, has it helicoptered in and guarded 24/7 by a CIA special ops team.”[20] However, as the weekend dragged on, his reporting took a change of tone. He reported on the Saturday that, “I know that I'm being followed. I know because I've just been chatting to the plainclothes policemen I caught following me,” and he was arrested twice in the first day of the meetings for attempting to take photographs as the limousines entered the hotel.[21]

He later reported that he wasn’t sure what they were discussing inside the hotel, but that he has “a sense of something rotten in the state of Greece,” and he further stated, “Three days and I've been turned into a suspect, a troublemaker, unwanted, ill at ease, tired and a bit afraid.” He then went on to write that, “Bilderberg is all about control. It's about "what shall we do next?" We run lots of stuff already, how about we run some more? How about we make it easier to run stuff? More efficient. Efficiency is good. It would be so much easier with a single bank, a single currency, a single market, a single government. How about a single army? That would be pretty cool. We wouldn't have any wars then. This prawn cocktail is GOOD. How about a single way of thinking? How about a controlled internet?,” and then, “How about not.”

He makes a very astute point, countering the often postulated argument that Bilderberg is simply a forum where people can speak freely, writing: “I am so unbelievably backteeth sick of power being flexed by the few. I've had it flexed in my face for three days, and it's up my nose like a wasp. I don't care whether the Bilderberg Group is planning to save the world or shove it in a blender and drink the juice, I don't think politics should be done like this,” and the author, Charlie Skelton, eloquently stated, “If they were trying to cure cancer they could do it with the lights on.” He further explained that, “Bilderberg is about positions of control. I get within half a mile of it, and suddenly I'm one of the controlled. I'm followed, watched, logged, detained, detained again. I'd been put in that position by the "power" that was up the road.”[22]

On Sunday, May 17, Skelton reported that when he asked the police chief why he was being followed, the chief responded asking, “Why you here?” to which Skelton said he was there to cover the Bilderberg conference, after which the chief stated, “Well, that is the reason! That is why! We are finished!”[23] Do reporters get followed around and stalked by police officers when they cover the World Economic Forum? No. So why does it happen with Bilderberg if all it is, is a conference to discuss ideas freely?

On the Monday following the conference, Skelton wrote that, “It isn't just me who's been hauled into police custody for daring to hang around half a mile from the hotel gates. The few journalists who've made the trip to Vouliagmeni this year have all been harassed and harried and felt the business end of a Greek walkie-talkie. Many have been arrested. Bernie, from the American Free Press, and Gerhard the documentarian (sounds like a Dungeons and Dragons character) chartered a boat from a nearby marina to try to get photos from the sea. They were stopped three miles from the resort. By the Greek navy.” As Skelton said himself, “My dispatches on the 2009 conference, if they mean anything at all, represent nothing more acutely than the absence of thorough mainstream reporting.”[24]

Skelton’s final report on Bilderberg from May 19, showed how far he had gone in his several days of reporting on the meeting. From writing jokingly about the meeting, to discovering that he was followed by the Greek State Security force. Skelton mused, “So who is the paranoid one? Me, hiding in stairwells, watching the pavement behind me in shop windows, staying in the open for safety? Or Bilderberg, with its two F-16s, circling helicopters, machine guns, navy commandos and policy of repeatedly detaining and harassing a handful of journalists? Who's the nutter? Me or Baron Mandelson? Me or Paul Volker, the head of Obama's economic advisory board? Me or the president of Coca-Cola?”

Skelton stated that, “Publicity is pure salt to the giant slug of Bilderberg. So I suggest next year we turn up with a few more tubs. If the mainstream press refuses to give proper coverage to this massive annual event, then interested citizens will have to: a people's media.”

Amazingly, Skelton made the pronouncement that what he learned after the Bilderberg conference, was that, “we must fight, fight, fight, now – right now, this second, with every cubic inch of our souls – to stop identity cards,” as, “It's all about the power to ask, the obligation to show, the justification of one's existence, the power of the asker over the subservience of the asked.” He stated that he “learned this from the random searches, detentions, angry security goon proddings and thumped police desks without number that I've had to suffer on account of Bilderberg: I have spent the week living in a nightmare possible future and many different terrible pasts. I have had the very tiniest glimpse into a world of spot checks and unchecked security powers. And it has left me shaken. It has left me, literally, bruised.” Pointedly, he explains that, “The identity card turns you from a free citizen into a suspect.”[25]

Who was there?


Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, the largest shareholder in Royal Dutch Shell

Among the members of the Bilderberg Group are various European monarchs. At this years meeting, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands was present, who happens to be the largest single shareholder in Royal Dutch Shell, one of the world’s largest corporations. She was joined by one of her three sons, Prince Constantijn, who also attended the meeting. Prince Constantijn has worked with the Dutch European Commissioner for the EU, as well as having been a strategic policy consultant with Booz Allen & Hamilton in London, a major strategy and technology consulting firm with expertise in Economic and Business Analysis, Intelligence and Operations Analysis and Information Technology, among many others. Prince Constantijn has also been a policy researcher for RAND Corporation in Europe. RAND was initially founded as a global policy think tank that was formed to offer research and analysis to the US Armed Forces, however, it now works with governments, foundations, international organizations and commercial organizations.[26] Also present among European Royalty was Prince Philippe of Belgium, and Queen Sofia of Spain.

Private Bankers

As usual, the list of attendees was also replete with names representing the largest banks in the world. Among them, David Rockefeller, former CEO and Chairman of Chase Manhattan, now JP Morgan Chase, of which he was, until recently, Chairman of the International Advisory Board; and still sits as Honourary Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, Chairman of the Board of the Americas Society and Council of the Americas, Honourary Chairman of the Trilateral Commission, which he founded alongside Zbigniew Brzezinski; also a founding member of the Bilderberg Group, prominent philanthropist and is the current patriarch of one of the world’s richest and most powerful banking dynasties.

Also present was Josef Ackermann, a Swiss banker who is CEO of Deutsche Bank, also a non-executive director of Royal Dutch Shell; Deputy Chairman of Siemens AG, Europe’s largest engineering corporation; he is also a member of the International Advisory Council of Zurich Financial Services Group; Chairman of the Board of the Institute International of Finance, the world’s only global association of financial institutions; and Vice Chairman of the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum.[27]

Roger Altman was also present at the Bilderberg meeting, an investment banker, private equity investor and former Deputy Treasury Secretary in the Clinton Administration. Other bankers at this years meeting include Ana Patricia Botin, Chairman of the Spanish bank, Banco Español de Crédito, formerly having worked with JP Morgan; Frederic Oudea, CEO and newly appointed Chairman of the Board of French bank Societe Generale; Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, an Italian banker and economist, formerly Italy’s Minister of Economy and Finance; Jacob Wallenberg, Chairman of Investor AB; Marcus Wallenberg, CEO of Investor AB; and George David, CEO of United Technologies Corporation, who also sits on the board of Citigroup, member of the Business Council, the Business Roundtable, and is Vice Chairman of the Peterson Institute for International Economics. [For more on the Peterson Institute, see: Appendix 1]

Canadian bankers include W. Edmund Clark, President and CEO of TD Bank Financial Group, also a member of the board of directors of the C.D. Howe Institute, a prominent Canadian think tank; Frank McKenna, Deputy Chairman of TD Bank Financial Group, former Canadian Ambassador to the United States, former Premier of New Brunswick; and Indira Samarasekera, President of the University of Alberta, who is also on the board of Scotiabank, one of Canada’s largest banks.

Central Bankers

Of course, among the notable members of the Bilderberg Group, are the world’s major central bankers. Among this years members are the Governor of the National Bank of Greece, Governor of the Bank of Italy, President of the European Investment Bank, James Wolfensohn, former President of the World Bank, and Nout Wellink, on the board of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).[28] Jean-Claude Trichet, the President of the European Central Bank was also present.[29] There is no indication that the Governor of the Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke was present, which would be an odd turn of events, considering that the Federal Reserve Governor is always present at Bilderberg meetings, alongside the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, William C. Dudley. I have contacted the New York Fed inquiring if Dudley visited Greece or went to any meetings in Greece between May 14-17, or if another senior representative from the New York Fed went in his stead. I have yet to get a response.

The Obama Administration at Bilderberg

National Security Adviser General James Jones

The Obama administration was heavily represented at this years Bilderberg meeting. Among the attendees were Keith B. Alexander, a Lieutenant General of U.S. Army and Director of the National Security Agency, the massive spying agency of the United States; Timothy Geithner, US Treasury Secretary and former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; Richard Holbrooke, the Obama administration’s special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan; General James Jones, United States National Security Advisor; Henry Kissinger, Obama’s special envoy to Russia, longtime Bilderberg member and former Secretary of State and National Security Advisor; Dennis Ross, special advisor for the Persian Gulf and Southwest Asia to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton; David Patraeus, Commander of CENTCOM, (U.S. Central Command, in the Middle East), Lawrence Summers, Director of the White House's National Economic Council, former Treasury Secretary in the Clinton administration, former President of Harvard University, former Chief Economist of the World Bank; Paul Volcker, former Governor of the Federal Reserve System and Chair of Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board; Robert Zoellick, former Chairman of Goldman Sachs and current President of the World Bank;[30] and Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg.[31]

Other Notable Names

Among many others present at the meeting are Viscount Étienne Davignon, former Vice President of the European Commission, and Honourary Chairman of the Bilderberg Group; Francisco Pinto Balsemão, former Prime Minister of Portugal; Franco Bernabè, CEO of Telecom Italia and Vice Chairman of Rothschild Europe; Carl Bildt, former Prime Minister of Sweden; Kenneth Clarke, Shadow Business Secretary in the UK; Richard Dearlove, former head of Britain’s Secret Intelligence Services (MI6); Donald Graham, CEO of the Washington Post Company; Jaap De Hoop Scheffer, Secretary-General of NATO; John Kerr, member of the British House of Lords and Deputy Chairman of Royal Dutch Shell; Jessica Matthews, President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; Richard Perle of the American Enterprise Institute; Romano Prodi, former Italian Prime Minister; J. Robert S. Prichard, CEO of Torstar Corporation and President Emeritus of the University of Toronto; Peter Sutherland, former Director General of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), first Director General of the World Trade Organization (WTO), and is currently Chairman of British Petroleum (BP) and Goldman Sachs International as well as being a board member of the Royal Bank of Scotland, Chairman of the Trilateral Commission, Vice Chairman of the European Roundtable of Industrialists, and longtime Bilderberg member; Peter Thiel, on the board of directors of Facebook; Jeroen van der Veer, CEO of Royal Dutch Shell; Martin Wolf, Associate Editor and Chief Economics Commentator of the Financial Times newspaper; and Fareed Zakaria, US journalist and board member of the Council on Foreign Relations.[32] There were also some reports that this years meeting would include Google CEO Eric Schmidt, as well as Wall Street Journal Editor Paul Gigot,[33] both of whom attended last years meeting.[34]


Clearly, it was the prerogative of this year’s Bilderberg meeting to exploit the global financial crisis as much as possible to reach goals they have been striving toward for many years. These include the creation of a Global Treasury Department, likely in conjunction with or embodied in the same institution as a Global Central Bank, both of which seem to be in the process of being incorporated into the IMF.

Naturally, Bilderberg meetings serve the interests of the people and organizations that are represented there. Due to the large amount of representatives from the Obama administration that were present, US policies revolving around the financial crisis are likely to have emerged from and serve the interests of the Bilderberg Group. Given the heavy representation of Obama’s foreign policy establishment at the Bilderberg meeting, it seemed surprising to not have received any more information regarding US foreign policy from this year’s meeting, perhaps having to do with Pakistan and Afghanistan.

However, the US recently decided to fire the general who oversaw the Afghan war, being replaced with “Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, a former Green Beret who recently commanded the military's secretive special operations forces in Iraq.”[35] From 2003 to 2008, McChrystal “led the Pentagon's Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), which oversees the military's most sensitive forces, including the Army's Delta Force,” and who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh singled out as the head of VP Cheney’s “executive assassination wing.”[36]

So, given these recent changes, as well as the high degree of representation Obama’s foreign policy establishment held at Bildebrerg this year, there were likely to have been some decisions or at least discussion of the escalation of the Afghan war and expansion into Pakistan. However, it is not surprising that the main item on the agenda was the global financial crisis. Without a doubt, the next year will be an interesting one, and the elite are surely hoping to make it a productive one.

APPENDIX 1: Bilderberg Connections to the Billionaire’s Meeting

Peter G. Peterson, one of the guests in attendance at the secret billionaires meeting, was the former United States Secretary of Commerce in the Nixon administration, Chairman and CEO of Lehman Brothers, Kuhn, Loeb Inc., from 1977 to 1984, he co-founded the prominent private equity and investment management firm, the Blackstone Group, of which he is currently Senior Chairman, and in 1985, he became Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, taking over when David Rockefeller stepped down from that position. He founded the Peterson Institute for International Economics and was Chairman of the New York Federal Reserve Bank from 2000-2004. The Peterson Institute for International Economics is a major world economic think tank, which seeks to “inform and shape public debate,” from which, “Institute studies have helped provide the intellectual foundation for many of the major international financial initiatives of the past two decades: reform of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), adoption of international banking standards, exchange rate systems in the G-7 and emerging-market economies, policies toward the dollar, the euro, and other important currencies, and responses to debt and currency crises (including the current crisis of 2008–09).” It has also “made important contributions to key trade policy decisions” such as the development of the World Trade Organization, NAFTA, APEC, and East Asian regionalism.[37]

It has a prominent list of names on its board of directors. Peter G. Peterson is Chairman of the board; George David, Chairman of United Technologies is Vice Chairman, as well as being a board member of Citigroup, and was a guest at this year’s Bilderberg meeting; Chen Yuan, Governor of the China Development Bank and former Deputy Governor of the People’s Bank of China (China’s central bank); Jessica Einhorn, Dean of Washington's Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) of the Johns Hopkins University, former Visiting Fellow of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), former Managing Director of the World Bank, and currently on the board of Time Warner and the Council on Foreign Relations; Stanley Fischer, Governor of the Central Bank of Israel, former Vice President at the World Bank, former Managing Director at the IMF, former Vice Chairman of Citigroup, and has also been a regular participant in Bilderberg meetings; Carla A. Hills, former US Trade Representative, and was the prime negotiator of NAFTA, she sits on the International Advisory Boards of American International Group, the Coca-Cola Company, Gilead Sciences, J.P. Morgan Chase, member of the Executive Committee of the Trilateral Commission, Co-Chair of the Council on Foreign Relations, and played a key part in the CFR document, “Building a North American Community,” which seeks to remodel North America following along the lines of the European Union, and she has also been a prominent Bilderberg member; David Rockefeller also sits on the Peterson Institute’s board, as well as Lynn Forester de Rothschild; Jean-Claude Trichet, President of the European Central Bank, who is at every Bilderberg meeting; Paul A. Volcker, former Governor of the Federal Reserve System, regular participant of Bilderberg meetings, and current Chair of Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board.

Honourary Directors of the Peterson Institute include Bilderbergers Alan Greenspan, former Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, a prime architect of the current crisis; Frank E. Loy, former Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs, and is on the boards of Environmental Defense, the Pew Center for Global Climate Change, Resources for the Future, and Population Services International; George P. Shultz, former US Secretary of State in the Reagan administration, President and Director of Bechtel Group and former Secretary of the Treasury.[38]

APPENDIX 2: Creating a Central Bank of the World

Jeffrey Garten, Undersecretary of Commerce for International Trade in the Clinton administration, former Dean of the Yale School of Management, previously served on the White House Council on International Economic Policy under the Nixon administration and on the policy planning staffs of Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger and Cyrus Vance of the Ford and Carter administrations. He also was a managing director of Lehman Brothers and the Blackstone Group, is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. As early as 1998, Garten wrote an article for the New York Times in which he advocated the creation of a global central bank.[39]

Amid the current financial crisis, Garten wrote an article for the Financial Times in which he advocated for “the establishment of a Global Monetary Authority to oversee markets that have become borderless,” acting as a global central bank.[40] In late October, Garten wrote an article for Newsweek in which he said that world “leaders should begin laying the groundwork for establishing a global central bank.”[41]

Three days after the publication of Garten’s Newsweek article, it was reported that, “The International Monetary Fund may soon lack the money to bail out an ever growing list of countries crumbling across Eastern Europe, Latin America, Africa, and parts of Asia, raising concerns that it will have to tap taxpayers in Western countries for a capital infusion or resort to the nuclear option of printing its own money.” Further, “The nuclear option is to print money by issuing Special Drawing Rights, in effect acting as if it were the world's central bank.”[42]

[For a detailed look at the moves to create a global central bank, regional currencies, a global reserve currency and a world governing body, see: Andrew G. Marshall, The Financial New World Order: Towards a Global Currency and World Government: Global Research, April 6, 2009]


[1] CFP, Annual Elite Conclave, 58th Bilderberg Meeting to be held in Greece, May 14-17. Canadian Free Press: May 5, 2009:

[2] Paul Joseph Watson, Bilderberg Wants Global Department Of Health, Global Treasury. Prison Planet: May 16, 2009:

[3] Paul Joseph Watson, Bilderberg Fears Losing Control In Chaos-Plagued World. Prison Planet: May 18, 2009:

[4] Sorcha Faal, Bilderberg Group orders destruction of US Dollar? MINA: May 21, 2009:

[5] Kristi Heim, What really happened at the billionaires' private confab. The Seattle Times: May 20, 2009:

[6] A. G. Sulzberger, The Rich Get … Together (Shhh, It Was a Secret). The New York Times: May 20, 2009:

[7] Chosun, American Billionaires Gather to Discuss Slump. The Chosun Ilbo: May 22, 2009:

[8] John Harlow, Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation. The Sunday Times: May 24, 2009:

[9] Press Release, Investigative Author, Daniel Estulin Exposes Bilderberg Group Plans. PRWeb: May 22, 2009:

[10] James P. Tucker Jr., BILDERBERG AGENDA EXPOSED. American Free Press: June 1, 2009:

[11] James Quinn, Tim Geithner to reform US financial regulation. The Telegraph: May 21, 2009:

[12] Greg Menges, U. S. Secretary of the Treasury Timothy F. Geithner speech before the Senate Banking Committee. Examiner: May 20, 2009:

[13] Robert Schmidt and Jesse Westbrook, U.S. May Strip SEC of Powers in Regulatory Overhaul. Bloomberg: May 20: 2009:

[14] Rex Nutting, Fed could be completely retooled, Geithner says. Market Watch: May 20, 2009:

[15] Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, The G20 moves the world a step closer to a global currency. The Telegraph: April 3, 2009:

[16] Marie Magleby, Obama Wants U.S. to Loan $100 Billion to Global Bailout Fund. CNS News: May 20, 2009:

[17] Joe Bavier, Sub-Saharan Africa to receive $10 bln in SDRs-IMF. Reuters: May 25, 2009:

[18] Onno Wijnholds, The Dollar’s Last Days? International Business Times: May 18, 2009:

[19] MATTHEW SALTMARSH, Former I.M.F. Chief Sees Opportunity in Crisis. The New York Times: May 22, 2009:

[20] Charlie Skelton, Our man at Bilderberg: in pursuit of the world's most powerful cabal. The Guardian: May 13, 2009:

[21] Charlie Skelton, Our man at Bilderberg: They're watching and following me, I tell you. The Guardian: May 15, 2009:

[22] Charlie Skelton, Our man at Bilderberg: I'm ready to lose control, but they're not. The Guardian: May 15, 2009:

[23] Charlie Skelton, Our man at Bilderberg: 'You are not allowed to take pictures of policemen!' The Guardian: May 17, 2009:

[24] Charlie Skelton, Our man at Bilderberg: Fear my pen. The Guardian: May 18, 2009:

[25] Charlie Skelton, Our man at Bilderberg: Let's salt the slug in 2010. The Guardian: May 19, 2009:

[26] Dutch Royal House, Work and official duties. Prince Constantijn:

[27] Deutsche Bank, Management Board. Our Company:

[28] InfoWars, Bilderberg 2009 Attendee List (revised). May 18, 2009:

[29] Demetris Nellas, Greek nationalists protest Bilderberg Club meeting. AP: May 14, 2009:

[30] InfoWars, Bilderberg 2009 Attendee List (revised). May 18, 2009:

[31] MRT, Top US official arrives in Greece. Macedonian Radio and Television: May 15, 2009:

[32] InfoWars, Bilderberg 2009 Attendee List (revised). May 18, 2009:

[33] WND, Google joins Bilderberg cabal. World Net Daily: May 17, 2009:

[34] Adam Abrams, Are the people who 'really run the world' meeting this weekend? Haaretz: May 14, 2009:

[35] YOCHI J. DREAZEN and PETER SPIEGEL, U.S. Fires Afghan War Chief. The Wall Street Journal: May 12, 2009:

[36] M.J. Stephey, Stan McChrystal: The New U.S. Commander in Afghanistan. Time Magazine: May 12, 2009:,8599,1897542,00.html

[37] PIIE, About the Institute. Peterson Institute for International Economics:

[38] PIIE, Board of Directors. Peterson Institute for International Economics:

[39] Jeffrey E. Garten, Needed: A Fed for the World. The New York Times: September 23, 1998:

[40] Jeffrey Garten, Global authority can fill financial vacuum. The Financial Times: September 25, 2008:,Authorised=false.html?

[41] Jeffrey Garten, We Need a Bank Of the World. Newsweek: October 25, 2009:

[42] Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, IMF may need to "print money" as crisis spreads. The Telegraph: October 28, 2009:

Andrew G. Marshall is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is currently studying Political Economy and History at Simon Fraser University.

Andrew G. Marshall is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by Andrew G. Marshall

Add to Technorati Favorites