The Big Society is a CON

The Big Society Is A Con.





David Camerons idea of 'The Big Society' is nothing more than a Neo-Thatcherite mechanism to dismantle the Welfare State and to force the public to volunteer to do the jobs the state once did, but without the benefit of a wage for doing so. The Big Society ideology is based on the Marxist ideology of an American radical leftist called Saul Alinsky, whose agenda was to 'destroy the state' and impose a Marxist regime in America from the bottom up. Alinsky wanted to radicalise society whilst stripping away the state, until a far left revolution could erupt at the street level and the government would be unable to stop it. The Tories like the Marxists share a hatred of the national state structure that protects the people from both government and the global free market. Whilst governments come and go, the state remains.



Both capitalists and marxists despise the state as it acts as the buffer between the people and the forces of the global free market. It was the Neo-Liberal Fabianists of New Labour who have sought to use the state as a mechanism to impose political correctness on society. New Labour created a mutated version of the state, the Servile State, that has grown into a bloated, monstrous, tax payer funded parasite which has intruded into every sector of society and our private lives in the name of health and safety, political correctness and 'equality'. It is the Servile State that needs eradicating, not the state itself.



Whilst billions of pounds of tax payers cash is being diverted back into the coffers of the government in order to pay back the money given to the bankers during the Credit Crisis, the Welfare State is being stripped away for the poor as the bankers bonus cheques are growing in size. Cameronism punishes the poor whilst rewarding the criminals.



Like all Tory supporters of the neo-liberal global free market, David Cameron despises the Welfare state. His agenda, just like Margaret Thatchers was, is to dismantle the Welfare State in order to allow global free market economic forces to replace the role of the State itself in society. The Cameronite twist on the Thatcherite mechanism of dismantling the Welfare State though is to portray this process as somehow 'empowering people and communities'.



Yet Cameronism will not create a big society where people are empowered to control their own lives and communities, for the simple fact that whilst the state is stripped away the private economy that will replace those defunct functions of the state will not work for the benefit of society, but solely for the financial benefit of the corporations, charities and other organisations that will replace the state. The fact is that many of the charities that operate in our society are run solely for the benefit of the people that run those charities, rather than the people and communities that will rely on them to deliver services in the absence of the state.



For British citizens to rely on charity to survive is to take our nation back to the era of the Victorian workhouses. The fact is that as the state shrinks, and the charities grow in size, then the only people who will benefit will be the people who run the charities and not the people who need services that were once provided by the state.



We only have to look at the nature of many of the charities in Britain to see how unsuitable they are for the role given to them by the big society model . Whilst there are thousands of charities that represent the interests of ethnic minorities in Britain, there is not one charity that represents the interests of the indigenous ethnic majority in Britain. There are dozens of examples of corrupt charities, ones that have funded and assisted Islamist terrorism in the UK and abroad, that have been involved in corrupt financial dealings and that have rewarded only the directors of those charities rather than the people in need.



Cameronism supports the dogma of political correctness and hence whilst nurses, doctors, police officers and soldiers are being sacked from their state jobs to save the government money, the structures of political correctness within the servile state remain in their jobs. This is why the non-productive diversity specialists, the race relations extortionists, gay and transexual lifestyle advisers and the equality and human rights parasites are being left in their jobs, whilst those people who actually do the jobs that benefit society are being purged from the state. This is why the government will also give billions of pounds to India and other foreign nations in foreign aid, even though those nations do not need that money.



Cameronism is based on a vile deceit. Cameronism seeks to depict the politically correct Servile State monstrosity created by New Labour as synonymous with the Welfare State. The reality though is that they are not the same, and nor are they being treated as the same by Cameron in the name of the Big Society. The Servile State is the enforcment mechanism of the ideology of political correctness. It a parasite on society and tax payers and produces nothing but social division, hatred, a culture of entitlment and grievances and imposes the Tyranny of Minorities on our nation. Yet whilst the Tories and their yapping poodle lackeys the Liberals are prostrating themselves before the idols of political correctness such as globalism, man made climate change, institutional racism, foreign aid, gay rights, ant-racism, anti-Islamaphobia and the rest of the far left ideological nonsense, they are at the same time promoting the lie that they are restoring liberty to the people.



The state that is being shrunk in the name of the Big Society is the PRODUCTIVE STATE, which are the functions of the state that actually benefit society, whilst the functions of the state that remain untouched by the government are the ones which are entirely non-productive. The Productive State employs people whose services benefit society, whilst the Servile State employs people who actively undermine the basis of society itself. The Servile State is symbolised by the Equality and Human Rights Commission who demand gay couples have rights in law, such as the right to a legally binding civil partnership, which are denied heterosexual couples. Whilst it is entirely legal refuse to allow a heterosexual couple the right to stay in your hotel, it is a crime if you refuse to allow a gay couple. Whilst Islamaphbia is a crime, the police do nothing to prevent the racist and religious abuse of non-Muslims when they are called Kuffar by Muslims. Racial abuse of Muslims is the subject of endless debate, but the racist grooming and rape of young white, mixed race, Sikh and Hindu children by Asian Muslim paedophile gangs is hidden and minimised. Whilst 'Institutional Racism' is researched and studied in society and regarded as a crime, the imposition of racist and sexist anti-white laws such as Affirmative Action and Positive Discrimination are legalised in the Equality Act. At the same time racial attacks against white people are virtually never researched or investigated by the police or the Equality Commission.



The state that is being shrunk in the name of the Big Society is the wrong state. It is the Servile State that needs to be dismantled and destroyed, not the Productive State which employs doctors, nurses, soldiers, police officers and teachers.



The result of the Big Society will be a Britain that a Victorian time traveller from the past would recognise. It will be one where charities replace the state and where the individual is forced to go cap in hand to some self serving functionary in some massive charity for help. If that charity says it doesnt have the money to help them, then they will get no help. It will be a society where the self appointed tsars of political correctness will dominate the remaining functions of the state whilst millions of middle class professional people with essential skills such as nurses, soldiers and police officers will be unemployed. It will be a society where unemployment will rise, homelessness will rise, immigrants will continue to pour into our country to take our council houses and jobs and where charities will become a rich and powerful as private corporations and further de-democratise our society itself.

The Dickheads

Someone pointed out to me a video of a recent meeting of around ten or so dickheads where the main topic of conversation seems to be me !

These people need to get a life.

I have been looking for an excuse to post a link to this song - and the dickheads meeting has given me the opportunity.

This song applies to all the dickheads of Britain, from hipsters to pathetic reactionary middle class egotists with a grudge against real working class nationalists.

This song especially applies to an old, sad, bald man in particular whose head actually resembles the helmet of a penis.

But with glasses.

Yeah, you know who you are dont you.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_5uVdy5YmA

HA HA HA HA

" Two days ago, I learned that the "Green Arrow" was now "officially" proscribed by the British National Party."

HA HA HA HA

Paul Golding and Green Arrow Unite against Griffin

I have just had a read of the article posted on the Green Maggot stite by Paul Golding.

I have never read such a self serving screed.

Here are the facts.

In relation to the Question Time debacle, I was the ONLY person on the BNP AC saying that Griffin should not do the show.

I said that we should on the morning of the show ring the BBC and say "Nick Griffin is ill and cannot make the show, and so we will send Andrew Brons instead".

Guess who was the MAIN person against us sending anyone but Griffin on the show - yep, Paul Golding.

It was Golding who demanded, yes demanded, that we send only Griffin on the show.

I told the entire AC by repeated e mails what was going to happen on the Question Time show.

I said that every person on the show would have been briefed with the endless idiotic quotes made by Griffin over the years, that the show was a lynching party set up for Griffin, that the aim of the show was to undermine our growing support base in society by associating the BNP directly with Griffin and that the show would crucify Griffin and thereby destroy our growing support base.

Golding has all the e mails.

So do the rest of the AC.

I said that as the plan for the show was so obvious, then we should destroy their plan by sending in Andrew Brons instead, as that way they would have not been briefed on his past quotes, would look like bullies when they attacked him and the BBC and the audience would also look like the fascists when they attacked him as Andrew is a quiet, middle class, well spoken person.

The ONE person who argued with me - was Paul Golding.

At that time Golding was Griffins biggest arse licker, a man who was so actively crawling to Griffin that it was embarrasing to watch him.

Griffin just wanted to get on the show due to his vanity - hence why he turned up surrounded by BNP security looking like a cut price gangster - and then the show followed the exact format I said it would.

As for the elections issue, one of the problems in the party was that so much money was being spent on staff wages and corrupt 'slices of the cake' from memberships and donations, that there was virtually no money to pay for elections.

Golding was the one of the three main trough gorging pigs at that time, whose expenses claims were around £28,000 for six months.

Griffin, Golding and Dowson were making hundreds of thousands of pounds between them out of the party.

Thats why money was not spent on elections, as Dowson had transformed the party from a political party into a money making scam for him, Griffin and Golding.

It was the Golding / Dowson / Griffin trio who were responsible for taking the parties emphasis away from elections onto fund raising - as that way they could each take a nice commission from the income.

All this is common knowledge in the party.

The BNP during the period of the vile pervert Dowson went from being a political party to a ponzi scheme - where the members were fleeced of their money and then robbed blind.

The Identity magzine is a perfect example - life members who paid for free regular copies of Identity never got them - why ? because the money to print them was being spent in commission for staff like Golding and Dowson.

To see Golding spewing his self serving bullshit on the Green Maggot site is hilarious.

The fact that the main brown nosing sycophant of Griffin , Paul Morris, is now weeping and wailing and giving a voice to people like Golding on his site is hilarious.

All Griffin has now around him are the people he pays for their loyalty.

When any leader loses the trust of his own senior officers, then he is finished.

Griffin has no respect from his own senior people and the public despise him - its only the morons still in the BNP who have never known Griffin who are the ones who support him still.

Thats what Griffin counts on though - that the morons still in the bnp will just carry on paying their memberships and keep him in power.

Griffin doesnt care if the BNP does well in elections - he cares only about making money from the BNP and keeping himself in power.

In fact the more successful the BNP becomes in elections, the more Griffin hates it - as it means the party has to become transparent and accountable - and Griffin is an old style nationalist who can only think in relation to scams, plots, frauds and money making rip offs.

The Golding and Morris alliance is a sign of just how pathetic the BNP has become.

The fact that these two brown nosing fuckwits were the primary cheerleaders for the cult of Griffin, should get the morons and other cultists to start to think about Griffin and the reality of the situation inside the BNP.

But they wont, simply as they are morons and cultists.

The Middle Class are the Underclass

As I have been stating for over a year, the new class warfare will unite the working class and middle class against the corporate bankster scum and their corrupt political class.




How the middle class became the underclass

Annalyn Censky, staff reporter, On Wednesday February 16, 2011, 4:30 pm EST

Are you better off than your parents?

Probably not if you're in the middle class.

Incomes for 90% of Americans have been stuck in neutral, and it's not just because of the Great Recession. Middle-class incomes have been stagnant for at least a generation, while the wealthiest tier has surged ahead at lighting speed.

In 1988, the income of an average American taxpayer was $33,400, adjusted for inflation. Fast forward 20 years, and not much had changed: The average income was still just $33,000 in 2008, according to IRS data.

Meanwhile, the richest 1% of Americans -- those making $380,000 or more -- have seen their incomes grow 33% over the last 20 years, leaving average Americans in the dust. Experts point to some of the usual suspects -- like technology and globalization -- to explain the widening gap between the haves and have-nots.

But there's more to the story.

A real drag on the middle class

One major pull on the working man was the decline of unions and other labor protections, said Bill Rodgers, a former chief economist for the Labor Department, now a professor at Rutgers University.

Because of deals struck through collective bargaining, union workers have traditionally earned 15% to 20% more than their non-union counterparts, Rodgers said.

But union membership has declined rapidly over the past 30 years. In 1983, union workers made up about 20% of the workforce. In 2010, they represented less than 12%.

"The erosion of collective bargaining is a key factor to explain why low-wage workers and middle income workers have seen their wages not stay up with inflation," Rodgers said.

Without collective bargaining pushing up wages, especially for blue-collar work -- average incomes have stagnated.

International competition is another factor. While globalization has lifted millions out of poverty in developing nations, it hasn't exactly been a win for middle class workers in the U.S.

Factory workers have seen many of their jobs shipped to other countries where labor is cheaper, putting more downward pressure on American wages.

"As we became more connected to China, that poses the question of whether our wages are being set in Beijing," Rodgers said.

Finding it harder to compete with cheaper manufacturing costs abroad, the U.S. has emerged as primarily a services-producing economy. That trend has created a cultural shift in the job skills American employers are looking for.

Whereas 50 years earlier, there were plenty of blue collar opportunities for workers who had only high school diploma, now employers seek "soft skills" that are typically honed in college, Rodgers said.

A boon for the rich

While average folks were losing ground in the economy, the wealthiest were capitalizing on some of those same factors, and driving an even bigger wedge between themselves and the rest of America.

For example, though globalization has been a drag on labor, it's been a major win for corporations who've used new global channels to reduce costs and boost profits. In addition, new markets around the world have created even greater demand for their products.

"With a global economy, people who have extraordinary skills... whether they be in financial services, technology, entertainment or media, have a bigger place to play and be rewarded from," said Alan Johnson, a Wall Street compensation consultant.

As a result, the disparity between the wages for college educated workers versus high school grads has widened significantly since the 1980s.

In 1980, workers with a high school diploma earned about 71% of what college-educated workers made. In 2010, that number fell to 55%.

Another driver of the rich: The stock market.

The S&P 500 has gained more than 1,300% since 1970. While that's helped the American economy grow, the benefits have been disproportionately reaped by the wealthy.

And public policy of the past few decades has only encouraged the trend.

The 1980s was a period of anti-regulation, presided over by President Reagan, who loosened rules governing banks and thrifts.

A major game changer came during the Clinton era, when barriers between commercial and investment banks, enacted during the post-Depression era, were removed.

In 2000, the Commodity Futures Modernization Act also weakened the government's oversight of complex securities, allowing financial innovations to take off, creating unprecedented amounts of wealth both for the overall economy, and for those directly involved in the financial sector.

Tax cuts enacted during the Bush administration and extended under Obama were also a major windfall for the nation's richest.

And as then-Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan brought interest rates down to new lows during the decade, the housing market experienced explosive growth.

"We were all drinking the Kool-aid, Greenspan was tending bar, Bernanke and the academic establishment were supplying the liquor," Deutsche Bank managing director Ajay Kapur wrote in a research report in 2009.

But the story didn't end well. Eventually, it all came crashing down, resulting in the worst economic slump since the Great Depression.

With the unemployment rate still excessively high and the real estate market showing few signs of rebounding, the American middle class is still reeling from the effects of the Great Recession.

Meanwhile, as corporate profits come roaring back and the stock market charges ahead, the wealthiest people continue to eclipse their middle-class counterparts.

"I think it's a terrible dilemma, because what we're obviously heading toward is some kind of class warfare," Johnson said.

Multi-Culturalism Is Dead

Multi-culturalism will end up the same way as Marxism - in the dustbin of history ;


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDJwZB52fLo&feature=player_embedded

The Green Arrow Spits His Dummy Out

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.