Sunday, 6 March 2011

The Price of Freedom and Oil

Who pays for freedom in the Arab world.

We do.

Msss immigration, an oil price catastrophe and Islamist terrorism are the products of regional instability.

Better stable nations under local dictators, than 'democratic' nations run by Islamists or political puppets of the US oil companies and the CIA.

To go from a Libyan dictatorship to an Islamist theocracy or a corrupt corporate pseudo-democracy run by Libyan puppet plutocrats and kleptocrats for the benefit of the US is not freedom.







Arab Spring could double the price of oil, says minister

Sam Coates, Robin Pagnamenta Rachel Sylvester, Alice Thomson


Petrol prices could soar to as much as £2 a litre if the situation in Libya and its neighbours deteriorates, a government minister warns today.

Alan Duncan, a former oil trader with 30 years of business experience in the Gulf, becomes the first minister to talk publicly about the price of a barrel of crude topping $200, well above the current record of $147 in July 2008.

In a worst-case scenario, in which terrorists use the instability in the Gulf and North Africa to bomb oil tankers or Saudi reserves, the International Development Minister suggests that prices could nudge $250 a barrel, which would result in British motorists paying £2.03 per litre. At that level, analysts fear that the country would be pushed into a double-dip recession.

“I’ve been saying in Government for two months that if this does go wrong, £1.30 at the pump could look like a luxury,” Mr Duncan says in an interview with The Times. “$200 is on the cards if ... anyone is reckless and foments unrest.”

The situation in Libya appeared to be worsening last night, with rebels and government forces clashing near a key oil terminal and forces loyal to Colonel Gaddafi attacking a town near Tripoli.

Britain is preparing to send a team of specialists, including special forces, to the eastern rebel-held city of Benghazi within days. Nato has been asked to prepare plans for how it would implement a no-fly zone, despite international disagreement.

However, Mr Duncan made clear that the repercussions of events in North Africa and the Middle East would be felt at home if the instability grew. “It could be very serious. If crude oil doubles, you’re going to have a serious spike [in petrol prices]. Try living without it for a week.”

The coalition is under huge pressure to do more to help motorists, with tax accounting for 63 per cent of the cost of petrol at the pump. Yesterday the Government confirmed that it intended to reduce fuel duty by 5p in island and remote communities, and the Treasury is widely expected to stop a planned rise in fuel duty in the Budget.

But events overseas could overtake any action that the Government wants to take, Mr Duncan suggests. In a barb aimed squarely at neo-conservative colleagues in the Cabinet such as Michael Gove, he says that “simplistic” attempts to impose democracy on the Gulf could make things worse.

“It is easy to be too simplistic, anyone can say they want democracy. The question is how do you get there and is there a danger of making something worse.”

Mr Duncan describes his relationship with the President of Yemen, regarded as a breeding ground for al-Qaeda, as “perky”. And in an extraordinary defence of a number of authoritarian regimes, he urges Britain and its allies to refrain from condemning the cultures and governments of the Gulf and recognise the progress that they have made already.

The Saudi and Jordanian monarchies face “massive checks and balances” within their own regimes, while in Oman women now drive and have the vote. Many Gulf states recognise the sense of crisis spreading across the region and are “desperately” trying to reform and address concerns.

Mr Duncan also spoke about attitudes to Saudi Arabia, a key oil and security ally with a repressive monarchy. “Saudi is massively important, you can’t just suddenly go one year to the next to totally different history and regime,” he said. “We have a duty to understand them, who are we to lecture? ... I don’t think we want to take military action so women can drive in Saudi Arabia.” Saudi Arabia may not be able to “turn on the taps” if there are further problems in the region, he warns.

Britons should recognise that a different approach is needed in the Gulf from in North Africa. He supports the toppling of autocrats in countries such as Libya, Egypt and Tunisia.

Economists said the impact of fuel rises would be very bad for Britain’s recovery from recession. James Knightley, a senior economist at ING, said: “That extra cost on households ... is going to hurt and squeeze their spending. It will also slow growth. At $200 a barrel for oil, it would be very difficult to avoid a double-dip recession.”

Andrew Horstead, director of energy markets research at Utilyx, said: “If the unrest is just restricted to Libya, then I think the market can cope. But the real reason why the markets are so nervous ... is the threat of contagion.”

© Times Newspapers Ltd 2010 Registered in England



















Add to Technorati Favorites

DO NOT WATCH !

DO NOT WATCH ;



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHsgVwHti_0&feature=player_embedded







Add to Technorati Favorites

Oh the Irony

Oh the irony.

From another site ;




At least two white UAF supporters in hospital after attack by Muslims.

This was not Muslims mistaking them for EDL.

They were beaten for being white.

Twitter is alive with comments on the attacks on the UAF by Muslims, here are a few:


#Rochdale #muslims beating up faux #communist #UAF supporters. As you sow, so shall you reap


faux #communist #UAF members shooting the messenger for reporting #muslim on UAF beatings in #Rochdale

#UAF supporter in #Rochdale Infirmary after being set upon by #muslim thugs

Reports of #muslim thugs roaming around #Rochdale beating up #UAF supporters, mistaking them for #EDL - oh dear me!

a second #UAF supporter has been admitted into #Rochdale Infirmary after being set upon by #muslim thugs. It's becoming a bloodbath!

Reports of #muslims in #Rochdale bricking the windows of a #UAF VW camper van














Add to Technorati Favorites

The Game Begins

We all knew that the next stage of the Libyan takeover would be to create a situation where British secret forces would be seized in Libya and their capture used as a pretex for an invasion to rescue them.

Libya is none of our business.

The Libyan revolution is an Islamist uprising sponsored by the CIA and using Al Qaeda CIA and MI6 Muslim Brotherhood run agents within Libya.

The fact that the majority of the Libyan people are sick of Gaddafi but also hate the Islamists as much as they hate him, is the reason why this revolution will fail.

The Libyan people want freedom - not Al Qaeda or the CIA or political puppets of the US oil companies running Libya.

We have seen the same old tired lies being given out by the media, such as Gaddafi has chemical weapons, the same as we saw in the lead up to the Iraq War.

The game begins.

Control of the oil is the answer to every question.



Eight SAS men in undercover mission are seized in Libya - by the rebel forces they went to help

By Christopher Leake
Last updated at 12:58 AM on 6th March 2011

Comments (76) Add to My Stories

An eight-man SAS team was being held by Libyan rebel forces last night after being captured as they accompanied a junior British diplomat on an undercover mission which ended in embarrassment.

The elite troops had been escorting the diplomat through rebel-held territory in the east of Libya as he tried to make contact with opponents of Colonel Gaddafi.

The diplomat had intended to pave the way for a more senior British official to establish diplomatic relations with rebel forces.


But last night the young Foreign Office employee and his armed SAS escorts were locked up inside a military base in Benghazi, the largest city held by opponents of Col Gaddafi.


It is understood the SAS incursion into rebel-held territory infuriated opposition politicians, one of whom told them to warn David Cameron’s Government that it should recognise the opposition as Libya’s legitimate leaders before attempting to open negotiations.

Sources admitted last night that there was huge embarrassment in Whitehall that the SAS mission had backfired.

But there was confidence that the SAS team and the diplomat would be released unharmed within 24 hours after the rebels had made their point. There were no plans last night for a second SAS team to be sent in to secure the release of their colleagues.






Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1363424/Eight-SAS-men-undercover-mission-seized-Libya--rebel-forces-went-help.html#ixzz1FtiYC5FS

















Add to Technorati Favorites

Friday, 4 March 2011

Alex Jones on Justin Beiber

Go Alex !


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuQuLzkdUuw








Add to Technorati Favorites

Famine rides forth










http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/03/03/uk-food-fao-index-idUKTRE7221TX20110303




FAO warns on oil as world food prices hit record

* Tweet this
* Share this
* Link this
* digg
* Email
* Print

Related News

* Stockpiling keeps pressure on food prices - FAO
Thu, Mar 3 2011

A woman looks for her groceries at a supermarket in Caracas February 28, 2011.REUTERS/Carlos Garcia Rawlins

A woman looks for her groceries at a supermarket in Caracas February 28, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Carlos Garcia Rawlins

By Svetlana Kovalyova

MILAN | Thu Mar 3, 2011 10:40am GMT

MILAN (Reuters) - Global food prices hit a record high in February, the United Nations said on Thursday, warning that surprise oil price spikes induced by Middle East unrest would impact already volatile cereal markets.

Rising food prices are a fast-growing global concern, partly fuelling the protests which toppled the rulers of Tunisia and Egypt in January and February, which in turn unleashed unrest in North Africa and the Middle East from Algeria to Yemen.

The U.N. Food and Agriculture Organisation's Food Price Index hit its second straight record last month, further passing peaks seen in 2008 when prices sparked riots in several countries, driven by rising grain costs and tighter supply.

David Hallam, Director of FAO's Trade and Market Division said further jumps in the oil price could have an impact on food markets, which have seen benchmark U.S. wheat prices surge 60 percent in the year to March.

"Unexpected oil price spikes could further exacerbate an already precarious situation in food markets," Hallam, said in a statement.

Oil prices recently hit 2-1/2 year highs, nearing records set in 2008, with markets spooked on concern that North African and Middle East unrest would choke key supplies.

Farmers depend on fuel to run agricultural machinery, while dry bulk shippers are heavy oil users, costs which are passed on to food buyers.

Spiralling shipping costs for commodities threaten to drive food inflation even higher as nations from Asia to the Middle East and Africa scramble for supplies, analysts say.

The FAO, which measures monthly price changes for a food basket composed of cereals, oilseeds, dairy, meat and sugar, averaged 236 points in February, the record in real and nominal terms, up 2.2 percent from January's record and rising for the eighth month in a row.

The Rome-based FAO has said global supply of main agricultural commodities would remain tight until new harvests in key producing countries and warned food prices could climb even higher.

FAO said in Thursday's statement it expected a tightening of the global cereal supply and demand balance in 2010/11.

"In the face of growing demand and a decline in world cereal production in 2010, global cereal stocks this year are expected to fall sharply because of a decline in inventories of wheat and coarse grains, " the agency said.

FAO said it forecasts global wheat production to increase by around 3 percent in 2011.



















Add to Technorati Favorites

Al CIAeda

Islamism is a tool of the New World Order.





http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2005/11/use-of-muslim-brotherhood-by-mi6-and.html



The Chicago Sun-Times reported, 28 November 2005:

http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-egypt28.html

Egypt, the world's most populous Arab country, is suddenly roiling with a wide-open, combative election that seems certain to end with the country's main Islamic group, the banned Muslim Brotherhood, as a big winner.

The country's rulers, longtime American allies, are starting to show signs of panic: Police have barred voters from polls and thugs have attacked Brotherhood supporters in recent days in an apparent effort to blunt the group's growing momentum.

Even before the final round of voting Thursday, Brotherhood loyalists have increased their seats in parliament fivefold. That's not enough to unseat the ruling party, but is still seen as a slap to President Hosni Mubarak.

The following is taken from http://www.redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan/BritIslam.htm

Prior to World War II British Intelligence cultivated ties with the Brotherhood through agent Freya Stark, the British adventurer and writer (1). These covert connections were used to keep track of the growing German presence in North Africa and to stay informed of the many different political movements that were springing up. The Muslim Brotherhood spread throughout the Muslim world and has evolved into something like a Muslim equivalent of the West's Masonic brotherhood. It became one of the first Islamic Fundamentalist terror organizations...

"According to CIA agent Miles Copeland, the Americans began looking for a Muslim Billy Graham around 1955... When finding or creating a Muslim Billy Graham proved elusive, the CIA began to cooperate with the Muslim Brotherhood, the Muslim mass organization founded in Egypt but with followers throughout the Arab Middle East... This signalled the beginning of an alliance between the traditional regimes and mass Islamic movements against Nasser and other secular forces." (1)

The CIA was following the example of British Intelligence and sought to use Islam to further its goals. They wanted to find a charismatic religious leader that they could promote and control and they began to cooperate with groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood. With the rise of Nasser the Brotherhood was also courted more seriously by the pro-Western Arab regimes of Saudi Arabia and Jordan. They needed all the popular support that they could muster against the rise of Nasser-inspired Arab nationalism to keep their regimes intact.

The Muslim Brotherhood was an obvious ally against Nasser, because he had abolished it from Egypt after it was involved in a failed assassination attempt on his life in 1954. The Brotherhood rejected Nasser's policy that, for the most part, kept religion out of politics. Officially the Brotherhood was an outlawed organization, but it remained influential and active within Egypt working against the secular regime, often hand-in-hand with British Intelligence. In June of 1955 MI6 was already approaching the Brotherhood in Syria to agitate against the new government that showed strong left-wing tendencies and a desire to merge with Egypt (2). The Brotherhood became an even more important asset after Nasser announced the Egyptian takeover of the Suez...

In Syria, in 1982, there was a major conflict between the Muslim Brotherhood and the Syrian government at the city of Hamma that resulted in 20,000 casualties. In the aftermath Syria's President Asad revealed that the Muslim Brotherhood forces were armed with US-made equipment...

Israel, forever inclined to back divisive movements, surfaced as another supporter of Islam and began to fund the Muslim Brotherhood and the Palestinian Islamic movement Hamas." (8)

The most noteworthy success of the Islamic movement during this time was of course the overthrow of the Shah of Iran and the installation of the Ayatollah Khomeini as the Islamic dictator. British Intelligence had used their contacts with Iran's mullahs and ayatollahs to help overthrow Mossadegh and install the Shah back in 1953, and these contacts were maintained and used again to overthrow the Shah when his regime fell out of favor.

The Establishment history of Iran's Islamic Revolution is that Khomeini's revolt was spontaneous and populist, and that it overthrew a repressive dictatorship that was hated by the people but supported wholeheartedly by the United States. It is true that the Shah's government was not a democracy and that his secret service, trained by the CIA, was one of the most effective intelligence organizations in the world. But what is not reported is that prior to the British-sponsored massive public relations campaign on behalf of the Ayatollah the government of the Shah was loved by the vast majority of the population.

After taking over from Mossadegh the Shah began to push forward a number of nationalist policies that increased his popularity at home but, in some cases, worried the Anglo-American Establishment. First, he signed petroleum agreements with ENI, the Italian oil company. Then in 1963 he pushed forward on a series of popular reforms that became known as the White Revolution. The Shah evolved into a nationalist whose path paralleled that of Nasser far too much for the Establishment's liking:

- He bought land from the upper classes and, along with the crown's own land, sold it back cheaply to tenant farmers, allowing over one a half million people to become land owners and ending the old feudal system.

- He allowed women the right to vote, and brought an end to the wearing of the veil, which were "Westernizing" moves unwelcomed by the religious sector.

- He pushed forward on a $90 billion nuclear power program.

- He moved to shut down the lucrative opium industry that had been created during the days of British Empire control that had been running for a hundred years. (9)...

The attack on the Shah's government came through the Muslim Brotherhood and through the mullahs and ayatollahs of Iran, supported and manipulated by British Intelligence...

Dr. John Coleman, a former British Intelligence agent... states in his report on Iran's Islamic Revolution (11) that the Muslim Brotherhood was created by "the great names of British Middle East intelligence" ...and that their mission was to "keep the Middle East backward so that its natural resource, oil, could continue to be looted..."

Dr. Coleman writes that in 1980 the broadcasts of Radio Free Iran divided the enemies of the Shah into four categories: 1. Iranian politicians bought by the Israeli Shin Bet, 2. The CIA's network of agents, 3. The feudal landowners, 4. The Freemasons and the Muslim Brotherhood (viewed as the same enemy).

In his report Dr. Coleman writes that in Iran, "At one time there was even a joke about the mullahs being stamped 'made in Britain.'" When the Shah introduced his plan for modernization in 1963 the Ayatollah Khomeini emerged as the leader of the religious opposition. Up until his exile from Iran in 1964, Khomeini was based at the religious city of Qom. Dr. Coleman relates that Radio Free Iran claimed that while at Qom Khomeini received a "monthly stipend from the British, and he is in constant contact with his masters, the British."

Notes http://www.redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan/BritIslam.htm
~

It would seem that the UK and US military like governments to be fundamentalist because then things are easier to control.





















Add to Technorati Favorites