Sunny Hundal - How The Media Help The BNP

Image - Sunny Hundal of The Guardian and Pickled Politics. He could only have got his job through affirmative action plans as he is a talentless hack.

His head also resembles a hairy testicle.






I will analyse a few points from the article below - but if you read the comments section of the online article you will read that Sunny says in response to someones statement that 'It isn't "far right" to want to preserve the existence of one's people'

Sunny replies with the comment ;

' Why isn't it? You're saying to me that trying to maintain racial differences isn't racist? '

Thats all you need to know about Sunny.

If you do not breed with a member of another race, and thereby accelerate the destruction of your own unique racial identity, then you are racist.

What a total twat Sunny is.

This sick, poisonous and warped 'definition of racism' comes straight from Sunny's deranged little mind.

Perhaps we should all be held down and raped / sperm drained so as to accelerate the process eh Sunny.

I dare you Sunny to go to any country in the world, from Pakistan to Russia, and say that to the people of that country and call them all racists for not misceginating their own people out of existence - they will call you more than a total twat, they will probably beat you to death as well you lunatic.

Note that even Andrew Gilligan took the piss out of the group that sunny is launching for peddling lies about Nick Griffin's appearance on Question Time that Sunny said lead to the death of two gay men from homophobic attacks.

The first gay man who was killed died a MONTH BEFORE Nick Griffin appeared on Question Time.

The other gay man did not die.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/100026946/is-there-a-moral-difference-between-nazis-and-communists/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/andrew-gilligan/7220004/The-BNP-will-dig-its-own-grave-far-better-than-Peter-Hain.html

If Sunny is unable to even get the most basic facts such as those right - then he and his group are a total joke.

Yes Sunny, you are an embarassment to journalism.

When Sunny and his collection of sad media whores like Yasmin Brown and the terrorism supporter Peter Hain peddle such obvious bollocks, only a total mug would take anything that Sunny said seriously.

Sunny is a racist.


Not only does he deny the very existence of the indigenous British people ( which is defined as a 'Holocaust By Default' as if we do not exist then we can be exterminated at will and it is not a crime against humanity ) he is also a racist in that anyone who is indigenous British must be called a Nazi and denied the right to campaign in British politics.

My comments to sunnys article below are preceded by ######## and in brackets.




http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/feb/23/media-bnp-push-agenda

There was a brilliant column by Johann Hari a few years ago about his experience of appearing on a Sky News programme hosted by newspaper columnist Richard Littlejohn. Having admitted he didn't know how much an asylum seeker got in benefits, Littlejohn screeched at Hari: "It's people like you who help the BNP!"

Now, you could be forgiven for thinking that the election of two MEPs would bring the BNP under closer scrutiny since last year. Surely the media glare would expose its nasty underbelly? The party's deputy leader, Simon Darby, doesn't seem to think so:

"Dealing with the press on a daily basis it is hard not to develop a healthy disrespect for the people who quite rightly can be blamed for the state this country is in today. However, certainly over the last year I am not the only one here at BNP Towers that has noticed a distinct thaw in the attitude towards us from some aspects of the media."

The problem here is that while newspaper columnists and reporters keep stating they hate the BNP and all it stands for, they nevertheless keep promoting narratives that harden BNP support. Here is a short list I prepared earlier.

Blaming racism on immigrants

A common media theory is more immigration leads to a breakdown of social cohesion and hence more racism. If we want to stop racism then we must stop immigration, apparently. This assumes that people naturally hate those of other races or cultures – which isn't true. We don't have moral panics about Americans, Europeans or Chinese people coming here because there's no threat assumed from them. People don't naturally hate the other but are afraid if they think the immigrants represent a threat to their way of life.

There are different kinds of threats, of course, which may not even be to do with difference. Sometimes completely different cultures are tolerated as long as people "do their own thing". My point is that examples countering this myth are numerous. Social cohesion doesn't need to automatically break down but it sometimes does need to be managed if flashpoints take place (which could happen even in a racially homogenous country – for instance mods and rockers). However, I prefer a stronger sense of Britishness.

###### ( social cohesion of Britain broke down because Teddy boys and mods had a FEW punch ups in Margate in the 50's and 1960's. Oh right. Unreal. What a knob)

Blaming racism on minorities

You know the answer to this one – are Jews to blame for antisemitism? I think not.

######## ( Many people think that the actions and behaviour of many individual Jews over history, from Marx to Madoff, bear a lot of responsibility for provoking anti-semitism including many Jews from Gilad Atzmon to Norman Finkelstein to Noam Chomsky and Yoav Shamir. This is just Sunnys way of trying to blame British society for anti-semitism as well as blaming British society for Islamaphobia, rather than Islamists and Muslims being responsible for generating Islamaphobia or the actions of some individual Jews for generating Anti-semitism in society.

So Sunny has to defend the actions of Jewish criminals, extremists, crooks etc whose individual actions assist in the promotion of negative stereotypes about Jews because if he didnt then he would have to concede that Islamists and Muslims themselves are largely responsible for negative perceptions of Islamists and Muslims amongst non-Muslims. Especially those dead, maimed or limbless non-Muslims who have been blown up by Muslims and Islamist terrorists)


This trick is usually directed towards long-settled ethnic minorities and used to hold them responsible for problems as a whole. But rather than blame them directly, these days the vague punch-bag of "multiculturalism" is used instead. There is the strong insinuation for example that all black Londoners are to blame for knife crime (which has fallen hugely incidentally)

####### ( Another lie from Sunny, as we all know that the Black Christian church going people from the Commonwealth who live in London are not a problem in relation to knife crime. They spend their time in church praising Jesus not stabbing people. The idea there is just one set of 'black Londoners' is racist rubbish. West Indians hate Africans, Somalis etc. Sunny you are an idiot. )

, or "their culture" is to blame. That inevitably leads some to call them "savages". And because minorities are then labelled as backward or uncivilised, it becomes easy to blame them for hating them. After all, the mythical "race relations industry" is also commonly blamed for all the evils of the world, as is the funding of cultural festivals (I've dealt with this one in more detail here).


##########( would be that the same race relations industry that you exploited sunny in order to get your job on The Guardian, as you sure didnt get there for your talents as a writer or as a proponent of truth and facts did you sunny )

Overplaying BNP gains, underplaying Greens

Come election time, every media outlet is anxious to see how much the BNP vote will expand by. But despite the Nick Griffin on Question Time drama and two new MEPs, the BNP's electoral support remains woefully small at around 2%. In contrast, more successful parties such as the Greens are ignored by the media, because they're not seen as "dangerous". This always overplays the BNP presence in people's minds and gives the impression it has become a widely successful party.

######### ( Oh yeah, the Greens are ignored. What planet is he from )

Playing down impact of BNP victories

Racial and religiously motivated crime usually rises following election of BNP councillors, research has shown. And yet this fact is rarely highlighted.


######## ( The best one yet. If you follow the link on the article it reveals that the 'research' was done by The Guardian and Hope Not Hate. So we can all trust their research cant we. Then lets look at the figures. In 8 out of 29 wards hate crimes rose after a BNP councillor was elected - but the research doesnt reveal WHAT RACE the people were who were victims of that race crime. It is a fact that the election of a BNP councillor means whites then report race crimes when before they didnt. So the figures are related to whites reporting more crimes against them and also race crimes that are ethnic minority on ethnic minority. But the figures also reveal that in 11 wards RACE CRIMES DROP AFTER THE ELECTION OF A BNP COUNCILLOR. Which kinda fucks up totally sunnys bullshit thesis doesnt it. The article also quotes a police officer saying of the rise in race crimes in Solihull that " Detective Chief Inspector Sharon Goosen said: "None of the offences reported in the area since 2006 can be directly attributed to an elected member or political organisation."
So sunny was talking total shit. AGAIN ! )



But people who vote BNP aren't racist are they?

If you want to vote BNP and think people of different cultures and races are scary, why not just say so? Every modern interview with a BNP voter is prefaced with: "I vote BNP, not because I'm racist but ... ", which inevitably leads to a diatribe on why immigrants are leading the country into hell in a handcart. It has been repeatedly pointed out, even in most tabloids and broadsheets, that the BNP is a racist party. It is tearing itself over the issue right now. Surely it should be obvious to most what it stands for by now?


####### ( the BNP 'tearing itself' - ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha )

Debate on immigration is being suppressed

Probably the oldest trick in the book. The rightwing press talks about immigration every day. And yet commentators on the right maintain with a straight face that the debate on immigration is being suppressed. What they actually mean is: those immigrants who don't agree with us are all bad.

Let's be clear: Britain is now a multiracial and multicultural country. This means more mixing, which in turn means that racism can never become as socially acceptable as it was in the 70s and 80s. But people's attitudes are way ahead of many journalists – who are still happy to push their bigoted agenda. That is what keeps the BNP's agenda alive, and it needs to be exposed.


######### ( So journalists should not criticise Jews and Muslims, the government should force people to marry people from other races, the teddy boys nearly destroyed British social cohesion in the 1950's and the BNP have a time machine that enables them to travel back in time and kill gays - sunny you are the world smallest cockend. You even look like a cock you mug. )



• Sunny Hundal is speaking at the launch of Expose the BNP: media workers and students opposed to racism and fascism on Tuesday 23 February at 7pm at the Amnesty International Human Rights Action Centre, 17-25 New Inn Yard, London EC2A 3EA. Other speakers include: Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, Mehdi Hasan, Peter Hain and Michelle Stanistreet

Pickled Politics - a few answers to your questions

Pickled Politics have a list of 20 questions for the BNP and the Egov Monitor magazine here ;

http://www.egovmonitor.com/node/25667

Has asked someone to answer those questions.

I have asked the ones that could be answered based on an analysis of the BNP's ideological positions, though other questions could not be answered that related to the subjective opinions of individuals which can only be answered by themselves.




Here's the list of first 20 questions:

Role models, affiliations, and policies of senior members of the BNP

1. Would Nick Griffin, Andrew Brons and all other members of the BNP be willing to submit to multiple independent DNA tests in order to confirm that none of them have any non-European ancestry within a particular timeframe (eg. the last 3000 years)?

Why ? It is not BNP policy to utilise or demand DNA tests on members.



2. If Nick Griffin, Andrew Brons, or any other members of the BNP are found to have any non-European ancestry at all within the timeframe mentioned above, would the individuals concerned be willing to resign their membership of the BNP immediately and, upon the election of a future BNP government, submit to all the policies which would be implemented, including repatriation to a country which is the closest match for their non-European ancestry?

Another non-sequitur - as the BNP do not ask members to submit to DNA tests why should we require someone to leave the BNP on any such basis.




3.On what basis can the BNP, specifically Nick Griffin, credibly insist that it is not actually a white supremacist organisation, when non-white British citizens are barred from joining it despite the fact that no such restrictions apply to white/Caucasian people originating from outside Britain?

We live in a multi-cultural society predicated upon the principle that every community has the right to organise ethno-specific groups to represent and protect their community interests in our multi-cultural society.

All other racial, ethnic, national, religious groups within Britain have specific organisations to represent and promote their community interests from charities to legal lobby groups. The ONLY group in our multi-cultural society that has no ethno-specific community organisations to represent their interests as a racial group are the indigenous White British, English, Northern Irish, Welsh and Scottish. The Equality Bill presently before Parliament adds to the plethora of existing laws under the Race Relations Acts and will impose positive discrimination, affirmative action plans and quotas as regards non-white racial groups that will actively discriminate against indigenous Britons and White Europeans in Britain on the grounds of their sex and race. Therefore until the Race Relations Acts, all anti-free speech laws and the Equality Bill are repealed then the BNP will exist to fight for the interests of all indigenous White British citizens, and all assimilated White European peoples within Britain who self classify themselves as White British, who suffer direct and indirect racial discrimination based on their racial origins as a result of the racist Race Relations Acts and the Equality Bill.



4.Specifically which policies of the National Front in relation to non-white British citizens do Andrew Brons and the BNP as a whole renounce or support?

Ask him. The BNP have no interest in the National Front or its policies.



5.Specifically which policies and ideology of the historical German Nazi party does the BNP as a whole renounce or support, considering the confirmed admiration for Hitler and his organisation amongst several senior members of the BNP?

All of it. Calling the BNP 'fascist' or 'Nazi' makes about as much sense as calling the Labour Party 'Communist' or 'Bolshevik', it bears no basis to reality. When the media start to believe their own propaganda then the media are in the grip of a self constructed psychosis.



6. Specifically which aspects of Hitler’s book Mein Kampf does Nick Griffin agree with, considering that he is on record as stating that he has “learned a lot” from it ?

Ask him.



7. How does the BNP reconcile historical and ongoing admiration of the Nazis and their policies with a) the fact that Britain went to war to destroy the Nazis, including subsequently supporting the prosecution and execution of various senior Nazis and other captured members of Nazi Germany for war crimes and crimes against humanity, and b) the fact that the BNP has been declaring the actions of Britain during WW2, including several major victories, as “examples of British greatness” ?

1) The BNP does not admire the Nazis

2) Our fathers and grandparents were the ones who fought and died against the Nazis - did yours ?

3) Our fathers and grandfathers fought for freedom from fascism, today we fight for freedom from Liberal Fascism, Political Correctness, Globalism, Islamism and the Corporate Media that undermine our democracy. The struggle is the same, only the enemies are different.





8. How does the BNP reconcile the above with a) Nick Griffin praising the Waffen SS and simultaneously attacking the RAF for its bombing of Nazi Germany during his time as editor of The Rune between 1995 and 1997, b) the fact that, during a demonstration at Coventry Cathedral in 1998, Nick Griffin accused British airmen involved in the wartime effort of having engaged in “mass murder”, and c) the fact that Nick Griffin has been on record as claiming that the Holocaust is a “hoax” perpetrated by the victorious Allied powers, making the following statement in 1998: “I am well aware that the orthodox opinion is that 6 million Jews were gassed and cremated and turned into lampshades. Orthodox opinion also once held that the Earth was flat…..I have reached the conclusion that the “extermination” tale is a mixture of Allied wartime propaganda, extremely profitable lie, and latter witch-hysteria” ?

Ask him.




9.Will the BNP’s proposed policies in relation to non-white British citizens also be applicable to Jewish British citizens ? If the answer is “Yes”, then all further queries in relation to non-white British citizens should be interpreted to also include Jewish British citizens.

It may have escaped your notice that most Jewish people in the UK are white. Those Jews who are not white mainly live either in Ethiopia or Israel. Note that the Israeli government have been accused of racism for stopping any more Black Jews entering Israel - http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/sesostris-the-great-the-egyptian-hercules/ethiopian-black-jews-denounce-racist-israeli-minister/






10.Nick Griffin has claimed that the BNP’s policies and ideology are in line with the teachings of Christianity. Is the BNP therefore claiming that, as the Head of the Church of England, Queen Elizabeth II agrees with the BNP’s interpretation of Christianity ? If not, is the BNP claiming that the Queen’s own interpretation of Christianity is wrong ?

1) The BNP is a secular party that defends British culture which includes Christianity.

2) We have no idea of the Queen's interpretation of Christianity and nor would we assert we do.

3) What the Queen believes is her own private opinion and we would suggest that you mind your own business and leave the Queen alone and not use her as a political football in your infantile attacks upon the BNP.




11.After the election of a BNP government, what would be the official policy in relation to Gurkhas who have served in the British armed forces and/or are serving at that particular time, ie. Will the recently-awarded right to British citizenship be revoked; will Gurkhas already possessing British citizenship due to military service be “encouraged” to engage in “voluntary repatriation”; will Gurkhas possessing British citizenship be afforded identical legal rights and protections as white/Caucasian British citizens ?

1) Gurkhas who served in the British armed forces will be given by a BNP government a much larger inflation linked army pension within their own country based on the exact same amount of money as those pensions that all ex-British Army veterans get in the UK, which we will also link to rises in inflation, and they will also have the right to enter the UK and utilise British NHS services etc at any time. Those who wished to settle in the UK on medical grounds would be allowed to settle in the UK with members of their extended families and receive NHS treatment and government relocation assistence.





12.Under a BNP government, would other non-white members of the British armed forces currently possessing British citizenship be afforded identical legal rights and protections as white/Caucasian British citizens ?

Yes.




13.During its various references to Britain’s historical participation in the two World Wars of the 20th century, why does the BNP never mention the fact that millions of non-white soldiers from the former British Empire fought alongside white/Caucasian soldiers on the side of the Allied powers in both World Wars, including 2.5 million soldiers from the Indian subcontinent during WW2 (comprising the largest volunteer army in recorded history), and including numerous non-white soldiers who were awarded medals for their military service and performance by the British authorities of the time ?

Yes they did, as did many of their own peoples who also fought alongside the Nazis from members of Indian Legion in the Waffen SS to Muslim dividions in the Waffen SS. All Empires in history have utilised people within the boundaries of their Empire to fight for them. That does not mean we in Britain should open our borders today to every one who fought for the British Army in World War Two or their descendants. They were handed back their countries after the fall of Empire as the prize of their sacrifice in WW2 and therefore we, and our children, do not owe them anything today. Britain no longer has an Empire, therefore we no longer owe them any debt or have any responsibility for them in any way.

Their reward was to be given back their own countries after the war.





14.To what extent does the BNP renounce or support the policies and ideologies of modern-day Neo-Nazi organisations across Europe, especially considering Nick Griffin’s ongoing efforts to build a pan-European alliance with organisations similar to the BNP based on the European mainland ?

We are Nationalists. Nazis are pan-nationalist Aryanists. They are not nationalists. Therefore the BNP has no contacts with Neo-Nazi organisations. Unfortunately the media suffering in the grip of its own psychosis, is not intelligent enough, rational enough or impartial enough to actually educate themselves about the facts nor tell the truth about what the BNP actually stands for.





15. To what extent does the BNP renounce or support the policies and ideology of the Ku Klux Klan in the United States, considering Nick Griffin’s confirmed links with the organisation ?

We are 100 % against such groups. Nick Griffin has never had any links with the KKK. This is just another media lie. I once stood in a lift with Keith Richards, does this mean I am member of The Rolling Stones ? Tony Blair has met and shook hands with Gerry Adams and Nelson Mandela, does that mean he was in the IRA and the ANC ?





16.What percentage of BNP members, especially those at the senior levels of the organisation, are currently or have historically been active in participating on the white supremacist Stormfront internet forum and agree with the primary ethos of the website and its founder ?

Who knows and who cares. We believe in free speech. We may not like what some of our own people believe or say but as long as we live in a democracy and they stay within the law that is their own business. We do not police peoples minds. Only Liberal Fascists feel that they must have laws and powers to invstigate what people think and say. The real fascists in this country are those who in the name of anti-fascism and ' The War Against Terrorism' have created the most pernicious fascist regime in this countries entire history - from the CCTV surveillance society where we have the most amount of cameras in the world in Britain, trackers bugs in wheelie bins, all E Mails being collected, all phone calls being tapped, secret police databases being built up on peoples opinions, ID cards, DNA swabs, samples and records stored in secret databases, secret evidence allowed in court cases, internment without trial and extraordinary rendition flights from UK airports. Whilst the real fascists are in power, their lackeys use the media to peddle myths to the public about the 'fascist BNP'. How dumb must people be not to see the New Labour Police State all around them.





17.As public figures seeking high political office, would the BNP be willing to release the names of senior party members who are currently or have historically been active in participating on the Stormfront internet forum ?

We do not collect that information and frankly no-one cares, apart or course, from those liberal, leftist and media idiots that see fascists everwhere, except in the reflection of their own mirrors or in the New Labour government that has created the Police State we are forced to live in today.

The real fascists in this country are the ones in Parliament and the Media. They conspire to steal our rights and liberties and then to divert peoples attentions away from the truth by pointing at the BNP and calling us 'fascists'. The real fascists run our country, the police, ACPO, the Trades Unions, the Corporate Media and the nationalised banks.




18.How will a BNP government ensure the safety of Britain’s female population, considering that a senior member of the BNP has been on record as stating that he believes “women enjoy being raped” ?

What this BNP member said was idiotic. That was one members stupid opinion. He is not alone though in saying idiotic things. This entire questionaire is full of idiotic questions and statements and the entire country run is by corrupt idiots who believe in nonsense and talk lies and speak rubbish.

Seeing as women in London who are raped or sexually assaulted are most likely to be victims of foreign criminals allowed into our country, then once we have deported most of them then all women of all races in our country will be far safer.

Race is clearly a factor both in victims and perpetrators of rapes in London.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1451606/Muggers-blamed-for-increase-in-gang-rapes.html

Scotland Yard is treating the evidence with care because it has sensitive racial overtones. It suggests a disproportionately high involvement of young black or Asian males in group sex attacks and that a high proportion of the victims are white females.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3397433.stm

Women and girls of white or European appearance accounted for 59% of victims with 28% of victims described as African or Caribbean.

Suspects of African or Caribbean backgrounds were identified in 49% of attacks or allegation of assaults and 13% were committed by men of Indian or Pakistani appearance.

We also have exposed the issue of Muslim gang rape of young white children and will impose Capital Punishment upon any individuals involved in grooming childen for sex and prostitution.

http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/93550


FOREIGNERS carried out one in six rapes in Britain last year, police figures have revealed.


And migrant workers, illegal immigrants and even tourists were responsible for up to a third of all sex attacks in some areas.

In Greater London, the worst area affected, foreigners were charged in connection with one in three rapes, statistics obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show. Other areas with large immigration populations – Cambridgeshire, Merseyside, Hertfordshire, Avon and Somerset – also recorded high numbers of non-UK citizens charged with sex attacks.

Police blame the influx of eastern Europeans into Britain following EU enlargement in 2004 for compounding the problem and have called for tougher border controls.






19. How will a BNP government ensure the safety, protection and welfare of Britain’s current and future disabled population, considering that a senior member of the BNP has been on record as stating that he supports forced euthanasia of the handicapped and others deemed to be “a waste of time, money and resources”, including the very old and (especially) newborn babies, in response to the death of David Cameron’s baby in spring 2009?

Once again a single member said something stupid. What he said has nothing to do with BNP policy. The BNP have not passed the Abortion Laws that since 1967 have killed 6 million babies in Britain. Nor are the BNP the government that allows abortion for babies over 24 weeks if they are disabled. Many of the disabled in this country are lucky to have ever been born seeing as they can aborted at any time under the present abortion laws. They are lucky to be alive today due to Labour, Liberal and Tory policies which made a disability as grounds for a late abortion. The BNP respect all our people. Many of our top activists are also either disabled or have family members who suffer from disabilities.

Below is a story about comments made by individual Tory councillors talking rubbish, so does this mean the Tories are anti-disabled and will sterilise the White working class ?

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2008/03/27/tory-councillor-suggests-killing-off-disabled-kids-to-save-cash-115875-20364018/

A sick Tory has suggested saving cash by killing off disabled children in care.

Senior councillor Hugh Jackson made the vile remark just days after David Cameron visited his area and claimed the party had changed.

Tory John Ward, who sits on Medway council, Kent, quit on Tuesday after calling for jobless mums, like Karen Matthews, to be sterilised.







Medical impact of a BNP government

20. What contingency measures does the BNP plan in order to effectively deal with the likely massive increase in accident- and illness-related casualties and deaths amongst the British population due to the rapid collapse of the NHS upon the pre-emptive emigration and/or expulsion/repatriation of non-white British citizens currently working as medical professionals in the NHS, considering that 16% of nurses are non-white, as are 40% of new dentists and 58% of new doctors ? (Figures: June 2009)

More nonsense conjecture based on media rubbish. The BNP will begin a phased plan of re-nationalising the International Health Service that used to be the National Health Service. We will no longer steal medical staff from the Developing World and rob the poorest people on the planet of their precious doctors and nurses. We will ensure that the NHS is able to run and function with British medical graduates as opposed to asset stripping the Developing World of their medical staff and leaving hundreds of millions of poor, mainly Black people without any health care. The theft of nurses from Africa is a crime against humanity. In the midst of the AID's epidemic, famines and social collapse the NHS has plundered the continent for its most essential and valuable people. This has to stop. There is no moral argument for using African doctors and nurses in the NHS, only what should be shame. As the NHS is re-nationalised then contracts for foreign staff will be phased out.

Pickled Politics and the Mafia of the Mediocre

A few days ago I had the pleasure of being banned from the Pickled Politics site by the mafia of the mediocre, the moderators, that run the site.

This was after the site put up an article about Nick Griffin speaking at the Oxford Union, where they stated that though Nick and the BNP had a right to free speech that the BNP were a nasty, despicable organisation with nothing to say and that its ideas and views could be combated and torn apart as easily as a wet kleenex in the hands of a sobbing liberal.

http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1551

The site says it stands for free speech and that the 'intellectuals' were ready to 'demolish' the arguments the BNP put forward.

BIG MISTAKE.

I trotted along their and began posting a few comments in response to the vapid and asinine comments being posted on the site by the regulars who post on the site. No problem for a while.

The arguments put forward by the people that post on the site were so pathetic that I wasnt sure at first if they were taking the piss.

They werent.

They really are that dumb.

For example one person called Morgoth wrote the following

" Therefore my question: do we possess the right to pursue conditions conducive to our survival?

Survival? Kelly Holmes (to take one example) is 100, no, a million times the Briton than Nick Griffen could ever hope to be. And the future of this country is assured with shining eggs like her about.

Lets have, as Rumbold (I think) said upthread, lots more inter-”racial” marriages - the sooner a shitty little inconsequntial accident of nature (skin colour) is made irrelevant beyond the point of total irrelevance the better."

I replied " Oh yes, just what we need as a society and a nation to ensure our future survival in a world where Peak Oil is about to hit and Eco-Conflicts begin is to allow people to enter and live in our country simply on the basis that they can run really, really fast. That the British people and British nation and British culture that has created such brilliant minds as Darwin, Newton, Stephenson, Charles Merz, Brunel, Dickens, Shakespeare, Roger Bacon, William Blake, Robert Grosseteste, Alexander Fleming, Charles Babbage, Tim Berners-Lee, Milton , Hobbes, Thomas Paine etc etc etc needs now to be surrendered so as to allow immigrants into our country and then justify their presence by saying they can run fast.

Pathetic.

That we should surrender our culture, ancestral rights and liberties and free speech just so that these immigrants who can run fast do not have to hear us complaining about the betrayal of all the wars and sacrifices our ancestors fought to keep our nation free.

As for the 'inconsequential' nature of our race, ask anyone from an ethnic minority if they feel their race is inconsequential. It is only white, self hating liberals who despise their own race as they have adopted the conditioned reflexive self hating guilt that Orwell wrote about. No other race but the whites want to destroy themselves or spend so much time on their knees pleading for forgiveness for the colour of their skin."

The comments that I had then managed to post a few times, then suddenly stopped.

A strange message then began to appear on the screen saying the site was now 'stopping spam' and that the moderators would vet the posts before putting them up.

Guess what - not one of the comments I put on the site were then allowed to go onto the site.

The mafia of the mediocre had decided to censor me and stop my free speech.

Pickled Politics had become proffesional hypocrites.

This is not unusual. I have done radio interviews before where the presenter has begun the interview before going live by saying that that he would allow me to stay on the show and debate with me.

Then when I have torn him and his arguments to pieces from the start, by the first break in the show I am usually removed.

What happens is that the media believe their own propaganda about us.

They say 'these people are thick, we can tear their arguments to pieces and they have no ideas we cannot destroy with our mighty brains' but then once they have to debate us, they realise that we are in fact intellectually and politically far superior to them.

All that the policy of No Platform has done is ensure that the journalists have gotten used to debating with the idiots of the mainstream parties.

Journalists are no longer capable of debating with us, as the quality of journalists is no longer such that they can debate with us.

For decades they have gotten used to debating with the idiots, middle ranking minds and muppets.

This is why they no longer debate with us, as they are now so dumbed down that they cannot win the debate.

Its like watching pygmies in a boxing ring boxing each other, whilst the real heavweight fighters have been forced to stand outside the ring in silence and watch as the pygmies are crowned the heavy weight champs of the world.

No Platform is another example, like way exams are made easier in schools, of our society dumbing down.

To ensure that the stupidscan feel good, the intelligent are either forced to become as stupid as the stupids or else are censored and ignored.

This is why we now live in an Idiocracy, where the idiot is the ideal.

This is also why programmes like Question Time and other political 'current affairs' shows are now so bloody boring.

Year after year, series after series, the same old boring politicians are hauled on to tell the same old boring bullshit to the British public.

Its like watching the political version of Jurassic Park, where only political dinosaurs are allowed to bellow and blow live on air.

Poor old Dimbelby must be bored rigid, it must be like Groundhog Day in the Question Time offices.

Things have to be bad if they invite Nigel Farrage on Question Time. To have the Kermit the Frog lookalike who runs a party filled with prostitute banging, corrupt, EU cash trough gorging, reactionary old farts on Question Time is a classic sign of morbidity.

That parrot is now deceased.

Those that say the Internet is the last bastion of free speech are deluding themselves.

Free speech is not free debate.

The Internet does not allow free debate, as the mafia of the mediocre that are the moderators on sites such as Pickled Politics, censor anyone they cannot intellectually contain and nullify.

Its like saying ' Here we have free speech ' and then denying anyone they cannot win a debate with access to the debating chamber.

It is nothing more than pure hypocrisy.

Here is my challenge - to anyone who thinks they can defeat me in a free and fair public debate on any political issues then get in touch.

Let me know where and when and we will have the debate. But I wont hold my breath.

Pickled Politics can kiss my proud, hairy, White, Anglo-Saxon arse.