Wednesday, 17 October 2007

Science, Race and the Big Lie

There is a very interesting article in todays The Independent. The Independent as we all know is a paper run by the most extreme bed wetting, self hating white liberals on the planet. It makes The Guardians liberal whinings look like right wing propaganda printed off the presses of Attilah The Hun.

http://news.independent.co.uk/sci_tech/article3067222.ece

In the article entitled ' Fury at D.N.A pioneers theory ; Africans are less intelligent than Westerners ' it states " Celebrated scientist attacked for race comments: "All our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really"

The article then goes on to state " One of the world's most eminent scientists was embroiled in an extraordinary row last night after he claimed that black people were less intelligent than white people and the idea that "equal powers of reason" were shared across racial groups was a delusion.

James Watson, a Nobel Prize winner for his part in the unravelling of DNA who now runs one of America's leading scientific research institutions, drew widespread condemnation for comments he made ahead of his arrival in Britain today for a speaking tour at venues including the Science Museum in London. "

So far so good. Here we have an acknowledgment that James Watson is , along with Newton, Darwin and Einstein, probably the most important scientist in history.

The article then goes on to say " Keith Vaz, the Labour chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said: "It is sad to see a scientist of such achievement making such baseless, unscientific and extremely offensive comments. I am sure the scientific community will roundly reject what appear to be Dr Watson's personal prejudices.

"These comments serve as a reminder of the attitudes which can still exists at the highest professional levels."


WHO THE F*** IS KEITH VAZ. This simpering little pipsqueak tosspot of a labour lickspittle isnt fit to lick the toe jam off the feet of this great man. Keith Vaz is the man who once demanded we end freedom of speech in the UK when he joined in with the rest of the Islamist extremist shit in this country to demand the ban on Salman Rushdies novel.

Keith Vaz is nothing more than a bent politician and lackey of the Islamist terrorists that have turned our once great nation into Brittanistan.

In March 1989, he led a protest in Leicester against Salman Rushdie's novel The Satanic Verses. At this event, Vaz addressed 3000 Muslim demonstrators, stating "today we celebrate one of the great days in the history of Islam and Great Britain" and attacked the Labour Party as a "godless party". In February 1990, he wrote in The Guardian newspaper urging Salman Rushdie not to publish the book in paperback because "there is no such thing as absolute freedom of speech".

In February 2000 the Parliamentary standards watchdog Elizabeth Filkin was requested to investigate allegations of undisclosed payments to Vaz from businessmen in his constituency. The following year, 2001, members of the opposition began to question what role Vaz may have played in helping the billionaire Indian Hinduja brothers - linked with a corruption probe in India - to secure UK passports.

In March 2001, the Filkin report cleared Vaz of nine of the 28 allegations of various financial wrongdoings, but Elizabeth Filkin accused Mr Vaz of blocking her investigation into eighteen of the allegations. He was also censured for one allegation - that he failed to register two payments worth £4,500 in total from Sarosh Zaiwalla, a solicitor whom he recommended for a peerage several years later.

Mrs Filkin announced in the same month a new inquiry which would focus on whether or not a company connected to Vaz received a donation from a charitable foundation run by the Hinduja brothers. The results of the inquiry were published in 2002 and it was concluded that Vaz had "committed serious breaches of the Code of Conduct and a contempt of the House" and it was recommended that he be suspended from the House of Commons for one month which gave him plenty of time to concentrate on his profitable sidelines.

Keith Vaz was also a director of the company General Mediterranean Holdings' owned by the Anglo-Iraqi billionaire Nadhmi Auchi, who had in the past hired British politicians Lords Steel and Lamont as directors. Vaz resigned his post as director when he became Minister for Europe, but it was later discovered that he had remained in contact with Auchi and had made enquiries on his behalf over a French extradition warrant, Auchi even calling Vaz at home to ask the minister for advice.

Labour's National Executive Committee (NEC) voted to resurrect the defunct Black Socialist Society (BSS) in 2006. As part of this, the party set up an Ethnic Minority Taskforce. Tony Blair appointed Vaz to chair this taskforce. When membership of the BSS exceeded 2,500 in early 2007, the society qualified for its own seat on the NEC. Vaz was elected to this post on March 10 2007.

How ironic that the Black Socialist Society is led by a bent politician who was in the pocket of bent capitalists like the Hindujas. Oh the irony of it all !

The Independent article continues " Steven Rose, a professor of biological sciences at the Open University and a founder member of the Society for Social Responsibility in Science, said: " This is Watson at his most scandalous. He has said similar things about women before but I have never heard him get into this racist terrain. If he knew the literature in the subject he would know he was out of his depth scientifically, quite apart from socially and politically."

Anti-racism campaigners called for Dr Watson's remarks to be looked at in the context of racial hatred laws. A spokesman for the 1990 Trust, a black human rights group, said: "It is astonishing that a man of such distinction should make comments that seem to perpetuate racism in this way. It amounts to fuelling bigotry and we would like it to be looked at for grounds of legal complaint."

WHO THE F*** IS STEVEN ROSE. Steven Rose is a Sharia Socialist, a self hating Jew of the worst kind who has become an apologist for Islamism and who blames the West for the crimes of the Islamist terrorists in our midst. He supports a boycott of Israel, but has never said we should support a boycott of Hamas and other terrorist organisations dedicated to the destruction of Israel. As a scientist he is third rate, a nobody on the charts of historical achievement. He is not fit to lick the fluff from the belly button of James Watson. Unlike Watson the scientitic achievements of Rose will fade into the background of scientific thought in due time. Watson like Darwin, Einstein and Newton will be forever remembered.

Like a rose, roses achievements will fade and fall. Watson though will never face the winter of forgetting. His accomplishments are eternal.

Seeing Rose and Vaz atacking Watson is like watching two retarded ants mauling an elephant.

Then we have the comments from the 1990 Trust. WHO THE F*** ARE THE 1990 TRUST !!!

The 1990 Trust are the assholes behind the BLINK organisation, which is filled with the foam flecked 'anti-racist ' racists of the black community. These are the loonies who are similar to Lee Jasper, the Black Nazi and Black Power advocate who sits on the Metropolitan Policing Boards. He was once a director of the 1990 Trust.

http://www.100greatblackbritons.com/bios/lee_jasper.html

So here we see that Black Nazi fifthwits like Lee Jasper who is linked with Ken ' the idiot ' Livingstone are linked to the 1990 Trust.

So the ENTIRE group of individuals that have attacked James Watson are ;

1) a Jewish Socialist who supports a boycott of Israel

2) A bent politician who sits on the board of the Black Socialists Society

3) A spokesman for an organisation that was once led by a Black Nazi and that now is supported by Ken Livingstone, a socialist.

Anybody else seeing a pattern here - yep , thats right all the people invited by the Independent to attack Watson are all professional socialist scumbags.

In other words everyone who attacked watson has AN AGENDA - which is to promote Socialism and its miserable and facile contention that there is no such thing as racial differences. In other words, they are all enemies of TRUTH.

Socialists are the enemies of truth. For the entire duration of the 20th century they have been propagandising the lie that race does not exist. Now the new science of Pharmacogenomics is about to become the new race based medicine of the 21st century.

This means the new Race Based Medicines will finally bang the last nail into the coffin of the socialist ideological lie that no racial differences exist. As soon as the science revealed that race existed, the socialists should have thrown themselves into the dustbin of history. But they didnt.

Instead they fought a war to try and label any scientist who spoke about racial differences as a 'racist' - and at the same time they were fighting a war against truth. Like the popes of old they would scream for the heretic to be brought forth and thrown into the fires.

Along with the socialist scientists the war was fought with the vile maggots of the media assisting them. The Guardian and the Independent, staffed with NUJ arselickers and socialist retards, also assisted the Socialists in their war against science and truth.

The BIG LIE was constantly pumped out that ' Race does not exist' even though millions of pages of scientific research and D.N.A evidence proved it did exist.

https://www3.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/journey.html

Now the science of race based medicines is about to finally cast these parasite socialist morons into the dustbin of history.

As a result of the failure of scientists to investigate racial diferences due to the attacks on them by socialists, literally tens of thousands of people have died as result - both from the lack of race based medicines available for people with illnesses to the failure of the police to demand race based DNA testing on DNA samples found at crimes scenes that could have caught criminals earlier.

http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2007/10/dnaprint

DNA testing has become so advanced that not only can it now define racial differences, it can even define ethnic differences within racial sets, such as the DNA differences between Anglo-Saxons and indigenous Celts in Britain.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Blood-Isles-Bryan-Sykes/dp/0593056523

France is even using DNA to test new immigrants into the country

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/10/11/europe/11france.php

The socialist scientists that have delayed and denied research into race based differences are guilty of a Socialist genocide - for they have been complicit in creating a climate of fear in the scientific community that has held back scientitic research that could have saved millions of lives.

James Watson is a pioneer both in his science and in thie fight against the Socialist shit that have fought against science and truth for decades.

Watson is a hero, his detrators and attackers are maggots.

It is time the era of Socialist Genocide ended and the enemies of Science and Truth were regarded as the enemies of humanity they are.

2 comments:

Dylan said...

Hi Lee,
Superb blog.
Many thanks :-)

Quote:
"Could it be that we are perhaps fixated on measuring intelligence in our Western terms? Alexander McCall Smith's novels about Botswana posit the view that wisdom is the greatest virtue and is unrelated to the academic cleverness that we so fixate on in the West."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/newscomment.html?in_article_id=488459&in_page_id=1787

Precisely!

D

Ben said...

Watson's comments are in fact backed up by considerable research. Also, have a read of the Snyderman & Rothman study which was published as "The IQ Controversy". They surveyed over 600 psychologists, behavioural geneticists & found the consensus was that:

1. IQ is measurable.
2. It is largely hereditary.
3. Group differences exist & these are partly genetic.

They then showed that the media has tried to portray this position as extreme, but it is actually the mainstream academic view. Of course publicly stating this can cost you your career as Watson found out.

http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/10/james-watson-tells-inconvenient-truth_296.php

Gottfredson, L. S. (2005). What if the hereditarian hypothesis is true? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 311-319. http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/2005hereditarian-hypothesis.pdf

June 2005 issue of Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 11, No. 2.

http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf