Whilst liberals seek a million excuses to excuse black racism against whites, Islamic extremism or Zionist Fascism - the reality of the rapes in prison that radicalise and racialise young whites is ignored and minimised.
It appears that whilst the merest form of racism such as a ' black look ' is enough to justify the title of a 'racist event' and cause 'emotional suffering' that justifies the anger of black society actualising in such events as riots, it appears that being the victim of male rape means nothing when the victim is white.
It appears that whilst America seeks to deny both the overwhelming black on white rape epidemic where black males rape white women outside prisons, at the same time it hides the reality of the vast numbers of rapes that black males commit in prisons.
Just because the rapist is in prison, doesnt mean the rapes stop.
All that happens is the black rapist transfers his evil onto an alternate sex - but the rapes are always black on white racist rapes, as the race of the victim always remains the same.
BECOMING A DEVIL by Joseph Sobran
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WASHINGTON -- John William King has been sentenced to death for the cruel murder of James Byrd Jr., a black man whom King and his friends dragged behind their truck until his body was torn to pieces. Most murders are cruel, but in this case the cruelty was the whole point.
Far from repenting, King, a white supremacist, still gloats over his act. After his death sentence was handed down, he addressed an obscenity to Byrd's family. Such vicious hatred is almost unfathomable.
The entire town of Jasper, Texas, is ashamed of the crime. King's family is mortified and apologetic. But like many diabolical acts, this one has summoned grace: It has united the town in the desire for justice for the victim and mercy toward King's family.
But a perverse moral has been drawn. Liberal pundits are citing this bizarre murder as evidence of persistent white racism in America. King is being turned into a symbol of general white guilt.
The truth is more specific. A clue to the real explanation lies in King's personal history.
King served a two-year prison sentence for burglary, which suggests a predisposition to violate other people's rights. While in prison, he joined a white supremacist group and covered his body with Nazi and Klan tattoos. One psychiatrist at his trial suggested that this may have been a way to deter attacks by black inmates. Time magazine quotes another witness as saying King became part of a group known as "peckerwoods," described as "whites who would not yield money or sexual favors to blacks."
Just a few details mentioned in passing. But they are worth dwelling on. White convicts complain, unavailingly, of a particularly ugly fact of life in prisons: racial attacks on whites by non-whites. Assault, robbery and homosexual rape are commonplace. The fact that there was a special slang term among inmates in King's prison for "whites who would not yield money or sexual favors to blacks" is grim evidence of this condition. Apparently there was no need for a term for blacks who wouldn't yield money or sexual favors to whites.
There could hardly be a better recipe for racial hatred. Young whites like King, a minority in prison, are thrown to the wolves, and they know they can expect no protection or sympathy from prison officials, liberal opinion or society in general when they are bullied and raped. The fear and humiliation they suffer is almost unimaginable, and it goes unreported.
In such snake pits, their only safety may lie in joining racial gangs. It should be no surprise when they emerge from prison not only hating blacks, but despising all conventional standards of morality.
This doesn't excuse them when they commit crimes like King's. No "root cause" can relieve them of responsibility for their acts. But it does explain their race-hatred as something other than the residual racial prejudice of the larger society. That hatred is the natural result of the specific experience they are subjected to.
Few men want to talk about having been raped. It has the same horror for them as for women, with the added disgrace of feeling one's manhood annihilated in a setting where one can least afford to lose it. To be raped in prison is to become a target for frequent rape. When the rapes also have a racial motive, the victim can be expected to respond by going to irrational extremes -- murder, suicide or generalized hatred against the whole race he feels violated by. In a twisted way, he may try to reclaim his lost dignity by adopting racial supremacism, posing as racial victor instead of racial victim.
So King may have come out of prison with a lot more race-hatred than he took in with him. James Byrd did nothing to deserve to be the one to pay for it. But neither do other whites deserve to be blamed for his fate.
If society in general can be blamed for anything, it's for making a prison sentence a sentence to hell, where becoming a devil may be a survival strategy -- for men of any race.
4 comments:
Rape is a crime against the spirit so I'm not surprised that King did what he did. I'm not saying it's right, just not surprised. During the trial, the media alluded to "problems" he had with black inmates but they never mentioned rape. I guess they were concerned about King receiving sympathy from the public. If a person is raped, it makes sense that they would develop angst against anyone who looks like their attacker. The ramifications of rape may be to blame for King's crime rather than racism.
Hi Lormaire,
Some good points you raise.
Male rape is a rape of the spirit as you rightly point out, whilst the rape of the female is a rape of the body. When men rape women it is usually an issue of sexual desire and physical power over the victim, whilst male rape in prisons is about physical and political domination. They literally want to 'stick it into whitey'. The white man must be subjugated and destroyed for it is the white mans 'system' which is to blame for all the problems of the black man. No black man is ever responsible for their own actions, it is always the fault of a white man somewhere, so runs the liberal apologist mantra.
Therefore in prison the white man is prey.
All prisons are racialised.
Therefore prisoners when they come into prison are racialised.
Those prisoners that do not organise into gangs to resist those who are organised into gangs, become lone prey. In that situation the black rape gang must be met with a white defensive gang.
The members of prison gangs such as Aryan Nations are defensive forces, the last remaining forms of individual and collective self defence from predatory black rape gangs.
Therefore such gangs as the Aryan Nations can only be seen in the context of the situation they find themselves existing within, and so their actions cannot be judged by the wider moral standards of wider society.
The failure of the US prison system to investigate, address and prevent the rape of white inmates by black gangs means the prisoners must bear the responsibility for defending themselves.
In the absence of the state and authority excercising its duties to protect the interests of individual prisoners, then those individual prisoners have a right to defend themselves.
In those gangs that are formed in such animalistic circumstances the rule is 'Blood In, Blood Out' - and that applies to both inside and outside prison.
King had to get his 'bones', in that he had to kill someone in order to get into the gang. That killing may be in prison or it may be outside it. The promise made to kill someone, was how he became an initiate of the gang - how he was in effect 'reborn', as the fact he was now in a gang meant he could literally now stay alive whilst in prison.
That is what being in a white prison gang means, it means you stay alive, it means you arent anally raped by individuals and groups and you arent murdered by gangs over a wrong look or a lost cigarette.
Being in a white prison gang is being literally given life.
In that context the brutalised victims of rapes either internalise the pain and self harm, or they externalise it and harm others people.
King chose the latter.
Others kill themselves.
King joined a gang and gave the blood oath that was the price of admission - the price of life.
By killing Byrd, King was fulfilling the promise that ensured he survived prison.
He got his bones.
But the crime ensured that he went back to prison.
The reality is that King never left prison. After the rape the old King, the person that he was, was destroyed.
The joining of the gang was how the physical body of King survived the prison process.
But the real King died in prison.
By killing the Byrd, the body of King merely facilitated its return to where its spirit was slain.
A very informative article on a subject that is rarely spoken of anywhere.
I would like to ask liberal what they think of this rape
Male rape is a rape of the spirit as you rightly point out, whilst the rape of the female is a rape of the body. When men rape women it is usually an issue of sexual desire and physical power over the victim, whilst male rape in prisons is about physical and political domination.--DOL
I was thinking more along the lines that rape destroys the victim's spirit whether man, woman, or child. I also believe that it is about physical power, domination (even political as you say) more than anything else.
All prisons are racialised.
Therefore prisoners when they come into prison are racialised.--DOL
Agreed.
Post a Comment