It is apparent that the way some of the supporters on all sides in the leadership election are acting, that none of them care for the party or the future of British Nationalism.
It appears that supporters on all sides are motivated by hostility to each other, personal hatred and petty spite - and that few are acting in the interests of the party or the movement that they profess to serve and respect.
I understand that there are already whispers of people setting up a new party if they fail to win the leadership election or if certain suspended activists are removed from the party.
The only people who will benefit from the setting up of a new political party or purging existing members from the BNP are the enemies of British Nationalism.
The BNP is the ONLY political party that has the political clout to compete in the electoral process.
Any new party will appear, fade and vanish as quickly as Robert Kilroy Silks 'Vanitas' (or was it Veritas ?).
Veritas had the benefit of a well known and well off leader.
Any new political party will have neither money nor a figurehead leader, and it will have to compete in elections against the BNP, NF and UKIP and thereby split the nationalist vote even further into impotent salami slices.
Those who say we need a new party to stand against the BNP, NF or UKIP in local, general and european elections are either idiots or working for the enemy.
Nick Griffin has announced that by 2014 he will leave the BNP to work on European projects.
That means by 2014 we have to have a whole new leadership ready to take over from Nick, and this leadership has to be elected solely on their merits and not as a puppet of any faction.
Note that I said LEADERSHIP as opposed to leader.
We need to have a team of people ready to run the party and not just a new leader.
We do not need a new 'leader'- what we need is new 'leadership'.
At the same time as we have a new leadership and leadership structure we will need a new party constitution and a whole new internal party structure developed to ensure the party can operate under this new leadership model.
No-one can run the BNP the same way that Nick Griffin does.
No-one in the party has the decades of experience of Nick nor his charisma and media skills.
To expect any new leader to run the party the way Nick does is not just unfair, it will be impossible.
I have the utmost respect for the courage of Nick Griffin.
Everywhere he goes he is recognised and at risk of attack.
This is an unfair state of affairs for anyone to have to live with, especially a family man with children.
Therefore the moment Nick resigns we must have a new leadership who will immediately change the internal party structure to ensure that party can continue to operate without Nick at the helm.
This means rather than power in the party remaining centralised around just one person, the powers exercised by Nick must immediately be devolved down to an Executive Council whose role is then to scrutinise and agree on party policy, finances, appointments etc by debate and consensus.
The role of the Chairman in such a new internal structure would simply be to cast the deciding vote in any internal decision making process in the event of any vote not having a majority.
The Chairman would be elected by the Executive Council and his / her powers would simply be to ensure the decisions of the council are taken properly, all relevant information is made available to the council and that officers tasked with responsibilities given to them by the council are fulfilled properly.
All decisions must be made on the grounds of a simple majority vote amongst the Executive Council.
Regional Organisers should be appointed by local members not by a single person. All appointments must be verified and approved by the Council.
Officers must be appointed by the Executive Council on the grounds of merit and proven loyalty to the party.
Candidates must earn the right to stand as candidates by demonstrating over a two year period their commitment to both the party and their communities before they are allowed to stand as candidates.
At the same time the entire financial, decision making process and appointments of officers must be 100 % transparent to members of the Executive Council, officers and members of the party.
We do not need just a new leader, we need new LEADERS.
If people in the party think that after Nick resigns that anyone else in the party can do the job Nick does, then they are wrong.
Nick is the only man who can do Nicks job.
That is why when he resigns the entire party structure, leadership and constitution have to change to recognise this.
That is why any new leadership has to be elected on a platform of change in order to abolish the present powers of the leader and undertake the revolutionary internal changes required to allow the party to grow and prosper in the post-Griffin era.
The only leadership this party requires, are the ones with the brains to realise that we do not a new 'leader'.
The more trusted officers who have input into a decision before it taken, the better that decision will be.
The role of the leaders elected after Nick retires is to devolve power down to an Executive Council.
Any leadership / leader that is elected after Nick resigns and who seeks to retain the powers of Nick and the present constitution, is not a fit person to lead the BNP.
Such vanity and ego will lead to its own Nemesis.
We therefore have to accept that the true leaders of the future are the ones who understand that true leadership comes from the example one sets to our own people and the party, and it is NOT the ability to issue orders and demands to people.
In order to lead others, one must first lead by example and so lead the way for others to follow.
The actions of some of the supporters of the leadership election candidates and also the supporters of the present leadership challengers have been nothing but disgraceful.
These idiots on all sides are as bad as each other.
All have damaged the party and the movement by their actions.
Therefore such people have demonstrated their unfitness for any leadership role in the party, either before or after Nick leaves.
I have read that some of these supporters of Nick want to 'purge' the supporters of the leadership challenge from the party, and thereby create a disgruntled group of people who will go off and form a new party to compete against the BNP.
Other supporters of the other challengers have said that if they lose the election they will flounce off and form a new party to fight against the BNP and split our vote, and hence ensure we cannot win elections in the future.
The ONLY people who will benefit from a purge or mass defections are the enemies of the British people, British Nationalism and the British nation.
The BNP must not split and there must not be any purges.
In 2014 Nick will be dedicating himself to the essential role of building a Pan-Nationalist Network of MEP's in the European Parliament.
This 'Alliance of European Nationalists' will seek to form a voting block in the EU in order to promote their European Nationalist principles.
This is an essential development within the EU.
I do not know if there will be any purges from the BNP by the supporters of Nick.
I do not know if disgruntled members will walk away from the party.
I hope not on both counts.
But if either events happen then I have a proposal to ensure that the interests of the British Nationalist movement are not damaged.
Tomorrow I will detail what these proposals are.
If the Doomsday Option arrives and a purge or mass defections begin, then the struggle for our people and nation is over.