The governments anti-Terrorism strategy is based on the proposition that there is a difference between Muslims and Islamists - but if this is true why does the government treat Islamists the same way it treats Muslims ?
Take the case of Abu Hamza today, who the European Court of Human rights has said cannot be sent to America.
Hamza according to the government is not a Muslim, he is an Islamist.
According to the government Islamists are not Muslims but criminals and political extremists.
Yet when he was in Jail Hamaza was treated like all the other Muslims in prison with kid gloves.
If there truly was a difference between Islamists and Muslims, then Hamza would not be treated as a Muslim but as an Islamist = and would have none of the rights and privileges that Muslims get in prisons.
The government tells us all the time that Muslims and Islamists are different, and then treats Islamists as it treats legitimate Muslims.
Islamists do not have human rights.
They are not Muslims, and also do not have religious rights.
The government says they are criminals and political extremists, and yet orders the police, prison service, courts and judges to treat them as Muslims.
This double standard is completely at odds with their own propaganda that Islamists are not Muslims.
So can someone explain why it is the criminals in British prisons like the Muslim Boys who are a criminal gang, Islamist terrorists and others are allowed to be trated as Muslims when they are not Muslims ?