The Afghanistan War, Nothing British About the BNP and the Murdoch Media

I am getting sick and tired of the scumbags in Nothing British About the BNP, James Bethel and Tim Montgomery, the idiots that run Harrys Place and the Murdoch media empire exploiting the families of dead British soldiers.

They accuse the BNP of exploiting dead British soldiers when we use their images in our videos and leaflets, but it is not we who can be accused of exploiting the dead, it is them.

The only real exploitation going on here is Nothing British About the BNP, a tory front group, using the families of dead British soldiers to attack the BNP and Harrys Place doing the same.

Both the Tories and Harrys Place supported the illegal war in Iraq that killed our troops.

The BNP would never have sent British troops to die in the illegal war in Iraq and in Afghanistan.

Nor would the BNP have cut the defence budget to send them under equipped to fight in those wars which has led to many of their deaths.

Nothing British, by getting a load of Tory supporting generals to attack the BNP, have disgraced the army and politicised the army.

The BNP have never pulled a load of retired generals chasing seats in the House of Lords to peddle Tory nonsense via the tory yellow press. These same generals were complicit in the illegal war.

They are also war criminals as much as the politicians that started the war.

Nothing British, run by Bethel and Montgomery and funded by the Conservative Friends of Israel supporters, have NEVER served in the British army.

Who the hell do these chinless tory toffs think they are using the British army to support their insane Zionist agenda.

As for the image used in the BNP video.

That image was an image used widely in the media and taken at a public event.

The murdoch papers used that image in their papers to sell their papers and profit from the paper sales, and they did not donate any money to any of the families of dead British soldiers when using those images.

Nor have they ever given any money to any charities for British soldiers even though they have printed thousands upon thousands of similar images in their papers.

The newspapers have exploited the dead by directly profiting from the images they print in their papers and at the same time print propaganda to continue the wars.

That is both immoral and disgusting.

The Murdoch Papers are also directly complicit in the illegal wars as they peddled the bogus WMD propaganda that led to the war.

Murdoch is a war criminal, the sun the Das Sturmer of today.

To be frank, the image of Liam Elms is not owned by the family and therefore they cannot say how it may be used, both in fact and law.

The BNP used the image in order to ensure this idiotic war for pipelines ends and no more British troops die.

The BNP want this war to end so no more British soldiers die.

Nothing British About the BNP and Harrys Place on the other hand want the war to continue and more British troops to die.

The fact is that what happened to Liam Elms was a tragedy, but what matters most of all is that no more British troops die.

Anyone can understand the parents and family of dead British troops trying to find some meaning to their sacrifice, but the fact is that what truly matters is that no more soldiers die.

What matters ONLY to the BNP is that no more British soldiers die and that must always take precedence over the natural desire of a grieving family to seek some meaning to the death of their loved ones by continuing the war they fought in.

At some point all wars end - and this war must end right now.

The moral politician and the moral politics would be to end the war now, not to perpetuate it because the blood of British soldiers has been shed already.

That is merely to perpetuate the crime of the politicians, perpetuate the deaths of British soldiers, perpetuate the suffering of families and perpetuate the war.

The only moral meaning in their deaths must be that the war must end, as there is no morality in using their deaths to perpetuate suffering, war and death.

It is natural for grieving families to seek a meaning to the sacrifice of their loved ones, but for those who understand the true nature of the conflict and the lies which have been used by corrupt politicians to start the war and continue the war, what is more important is that no more soldiers die in their illegal wars.

In order to fight this ongoing insane war then the public have to be reminded of the fact that British soldiers are dying and being maimed in it.

That means those who want to hide the fact that our troops are dying and being maimed by hiding the images of the dead and wounded in order to allow this war to continue are complicit in the deaths of our troops, and by attacking the BNP who want the war to stop, are acting as war propagandists and peddling pro-war propaganda.

Note that the Tory Party policy to continue the Afghanistan War is the same position as Nothing British About the BNP and Harrys Place and the Murdoch Media that support the Tories - and who also support a war on Iran.

Nothing British About the BNP, Harrys Place and the Murdoch Media Empire all support the continuation of the Afghanistan War, the ongoing death of British troops in that war and also a war on Iran.

YOU ARE WAR MONGERING CRIMINALS USING THE FAMILIES OF DEAD BRITISH SOLDIERS TO CONTINUE YOUR ILLEGAL WARS.

You should be ashamed of yourselves.

The BNP policy is the only moral policy - as under the BNP no more illegal wars will be fought, no more British troops will die, no more Murdoch Press papers like The Sun will be allowed to peddle their propaganda and no more grieving families will have to cling to the hope that their family members have not died in vain.

That makes the BNP the ONLY moral politivcal party in the UK.

Nothing British About the BNP are vile, evil, cynical little toerags using the families of dead British soldiers to continue their illegal wars and to support the Tories.

Retired Generals and the BNP.

Image - Lord James Bethell, Tory Toff and writer for Conservative Home website as shown on link here ;

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/columnists/2007/12/cameron-watt-fi.html



Why is it that when retired generals working with the Tory front group, Nothing British About The BNP, which is run by two tory toffs Tim Montgomery and James Bethell of Conservative Home and who are employed by the Tory Party, say the BNP are 'exploiting the army' they are still are taken seriously by the media when they are still using their ex-military titles, are speaking as retired generals of the British Army and are speaking on issues in politics related to the British Army for a Tory supporting front group - but of course say they are not exploiting the British Army, but that the BNP are when we put a picture of Churchill on a leaflet.

The only reason why the Tory Generals were used by the Tory Toffs on the Nothing British About the BNP website to attack the BNP was because they were retired generals who support the Tories and they were prepared to work with the Tories to attack the BNP, and they were therefore 'politicising' and exploiting the British Army for their own political ends.

The fact that General Dannatt was outed as a Tory recently shows us that the generals arent averse to using the British Army as a political tool when it suits them.

This whole thing was a cynical media stunt cooked up Camerons chinless wonders, Montgomery and Bethell, as part of their Tory front group Nothing British About The Bnp - which is in reality is a project for bored aristocrats like Lord Bethell who dont have to work due to their vast inherited wealth.

The retired Generals Sir Mike Jackson and General Sir Richard Dannatt are well known Tory stooges.

Simon Weston was outed as a Tory last year ;

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7276924.stm

" David Cameron says the government is not meeting its duty to armed forces personnel risking lives for Britain.

The Tory leader launched a commission, headed by author Frederick Forsyth, into the "military covenant", which he says has been "well and truly broken".

It will advise him on issues affecting the armed forces like recuperation, training and families' welfare.

The government says nobody in the armed forces said the covenant was broken and it has made "significant improvements".

The Commission, which will also involve Falklands veteran Simon Weston, will look at how to ensure troops serving abroad get the right equipment, better telephone and email links with family and the best health treatment. "



No doubt Andy mcNab has been promised a touch of the old ermine by the Tory Toffs in Nothing British About the BNP when the Tories are in power.


Tim Collins is another Tory lackey ;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Collins_%28British_Army_officer%29

He supported David Davis in his successful July 2008 by-election campaign.[10]

Since leaving the army Collins' views on the Iraq conflict and other military issues have been widely sought by UK and international news media, and a succession of outspoken comments have meant that he has seldom been far from controversy. In 2006, for example, he questioned the effectiveness of today's Royal Air Force and called for it to be disbanded.[8]

Tim Collins is such a defender of the British Army he has advocated the abolition of the RAF.

With leaders like that we might as well be in the EU Army.

Afghanistan - A war for Gas and Oil Pipelines

Image - US army bases in Afghanistan




Image - Oil and Gas pipeline routes



Image - oil and gas pipe line routes through Afghanistan





Is there anything dumber than a journalist who writes for the Times.


Take Bronwen Maddox and her article here ;

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/bronwen_maddox/article6739302.ece

Usually when a journalist idiot wants us to become entangled in another war / social work action using the British army / policing role / Oil Imperialism escapade then they either use the usual 'Think of the children' routine or now the 'what about the women' routine.

I cannot believe that such people are allowed to write for The Times, unless the Times is still 'seeding public opinion with lies' as Carol Quigley stated in his books was its main role.

We are not in Afghanistan for any of the following reasons ;

1) Helping the children
2) Helping the women
3) Stopping the heroin
4) Fighting terrorism
5) Stopping terrorism in the UK

It is total hypocrisy to say the UK and US are in Afghanistan to 'fight islamic extremism and Al Qaeda' when Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and the Taliban were all creations of the CIA during the Afghan War against the Russians.

The US created the Taliban and sponsored its growth, long enough for it to grow to such a size that it then gave the US the opportunity to invade Afghanistan and take control of the country under the pretext of 'fighting Islamic terrorism'.

If it wasnt for the US there would be no Islamic extremists undertaking terrorism - as the US built up those terrorist groups, funded and armed them.

There is in fact two reasons why we are in Afghanistan, and why British soldiers are dying, and that is for ;

1) Oil

2) Gas

This war was started in 1999 with the passing of the Silk Road Strategy Act in the US.

Note the contents of the act here ;

http://www.eurasianet.org/resource/regional/silkroad.html

Note section 6 of the act ;

(6) The region of the South Caucasus and Central Asia could produce oil and gas in sufficient quantities to reduce the dependence of the United States on energy from the volatile Persian Gulf region.

and further ;

`(c) ACTIVITIES SUPPORTED- Activities that may be supported by programs under subsection (b) include promoting actively the participation of United States companies and investors in the planning, financing, and construction of infrastructure for communications, transportation, including air transportation, and energy and trade including highways, railroads, port facilities, shipping, banking, insurance, telecommunications networks, and gas and oil pipelines.


The act was revised in 2006 to include the energy interests of the US as one of the primary reasons for the US to be in Afghanistan - note no reference to Osama Bin Laden or Al Qaeda ;

http://www.theorator.com/bills109/s2749.html


(b) Findings- Congress makes the following findings:

(3) The liberation of Afghanistan from Taliban misrule and the new course in Afghanistan toward political and economic openness make possible the country's reintegration into Central Asia.

(4) The ouster of the Taliban from Afghanistan has diminished threats to that country's neighbors in Central Asia, allowing for accelerated progress toward democracy, open economies, and the rule of law across the region. Afghanistan's embrace of popular sovereignty and political pluralism demonstrates the universal applicability of these values.

(5) The Governments of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan, which have contributed to United States military deployments in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Kosovo, are key United States partners in diversification of energy sources and transportation routes, enhancing and contributing to United States energy and security interests.

(6) In recognition of global and regional threats to stability, prosperity, and democracy in Afghanistan, including terrorism, political-religious extremism, and production and trafficking of narcotics, and in recognition of Afghanistan's geographic location and cultural and historical identity, Afghanistan should be considered to be among the countries of Central Asia, and not separate from them.

(7) In recognition of security cooperation from the Government of Kazakhstan, including deployment of the Kazakhstan contingent in Iraq, progress toward a market economy, United States business participation in energy and infrastructure development in Kazakhstan, and an ongoing Government of Kazakhstan policy of ethnic and religious tolerance, a relationship with Kazakhstan is of high importance to the United States. "


The maps above show you the proposed Oil pipe line and gas pipe line planned for Afghanistan - The Eurasian Corridor.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Afghanistan_Pipeline


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/2608713.stm

An agreement has been signed in the Turkmen capital, Ashgabat, paving the way for construction of a gas pipeline from the Central Asian republic through Afghanistan to Pakistan.



The Global research Group states that ;

The Eurasian Corridor

Since the 2001 invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, the US has a military presence on China's Western frontier, in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The U.S. is intent upon establishing permanent military bases in Afghanistan, which occupies a strategic position bordering on the former Soviet republics, China and Iran.

Moreover, the US and NATO have also established since 1996, military ties with several former Soviet republics under GUUAM (Georgia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan and Moldava). In the post 9/11 era, Washington has used the pretext of the "global war against terrorism" to further develop a U.S. military presence in GUUAM countries. Uzbekistan withdrew from GUUAM in 2002.(The organization is now referred to as GUAM).

China has oil interests in Eurasia as well as in sub-Saharan Africa, which encroach upon Anglo-American oil interests.

What is at stake is the geopolitical control over the Eurasian corridor.

In March 1999, the U.S. Congress adopted the Silk Road Strategy Act, which defined America’s broad economic and strategic interests in a region extending from the Eastern Mediterranean to Central Asia. The Silk Road Strategy (SRS) outlines a framework for the development of America’s business empire along an extensive geographical corridor.

The successful implementation of the SRS requires the concurrent "militarization" of the entire Eurasian corridor as a means to securing control over extensive oil and gas reserves, as well as "protecting" pipeline routes and trading corridors. This militarization is largely directed against China, Russia and Iran.

Take a look at the maps above - then note how the army bases are in prime positions to protect the oil and gas pipelines.

That is what this 'war' is about.

The Afghanistan war is about securing the territory through which the oil and gas pipelines will have to pass through in order to ensure Russia, China and Iran are outmanouvered in the last great wars for the last of the global oil supplies on the planet.

Only yesterday the Independent reported that the Peak Oil process is even close than the 'experts' have been so far admitting.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/warning-oil-supplies-are-running-out-fast-1766585.html

The world is heading for a catastrophic energy crunch that could cripple a global economic recovery because most of the major oil fields in the world have passed their peak production, a leading energy economist has warned.


Higher oil prices brought on by a rapid increase in demand and a stagnation, or even decline, in supply could blow any recovery off course, said Dr Fatih Birol, the chief economist at the respected International Energy Agency (IEA) in Paris, which is charged with the task of assessing future energy supplies by OECD countries.



This is what the Iraq War and Afghanistan War are about.

This is also why China is exporting millions of its people into Africa in order to colonise the African continent as Lebensraum for the Chinese state - and to steal its oil and resources from the indigenous African people.


British troops are being slaughtered in Afghanistan for gas and oil pipelines.

That is the truth behind the lies the government spin.

They lied to get us into Iraq and they are lieing now about why we went into Afghanistan.

The Taliban are not Al Qaeda.

The Taliban are mainly local Afghans who do not want to be occupied by any invading army, local Afghan nationalists resisting occupation, ISI pakistani agents fighting a proxy war against the US, drug smugglers and opium growers protecting their drug territories, foreign jihadists working with the pakistani ISI and the angry relatives of Afghans killed by coalition forces getting revenge.

The Taliban are not a threat to us - the fact we are over there means Islamists will attack us over there and over here.

We must withdraw our troops from Afghanistan, return them to the UK and deploy them at British ports in order to seal our own national borders and assist in the removal of all illegal immigrants from the UK, we must deport all islamist supporters from the UK, execute all convicted islamist terrorists in the UK, deport all those that fund, support and assist Islamist terrorism in the UK - and most important of all create a 100 % national energy production system that means we do not have to depend on any imports of energy from the Middle East oil, Russian gas or Eurasian oil and gas supplies.

We are at risk of being attacked here in Britain, because we are over there in Islamic nations stealing their gas and oil, or stealing their land to allow us to pump the gas and oil of other nations into our nations.