Sunday 15 February 2015

Rotherham Rapes Template
Please could you send me information re the EHRC's response to the recent expose of the Rotherham Rapes scandal ;
1) Has the EHRC begun an investigation into the Rotherham Rapes issue ?
2) Has the EHRC investigated the racial aspects of the cases, eg the targeting of white children by non-whites ?
3) Has the EHRC any plans to issue guidance to the police / councils/ social services across the UK to protect white British children at risk of similar rape gangs ?
4) When will the EHRC begin an investigation into the Rotherham Rapes as required under their duties under the Race Relations Acts in order to protect white children at risk of rape by ethnic non-white gangs ?
1) Under the FOI act I would like all ;
a) internal EHRC correspondence as regards issues relating to the Rotherham rapes scandal
b) all correspondence between EHRC staff and government ministers, civil servants etc relating to the Rotherham rapes
c) all correspondence by EHRC staff with any third party agencies, charities, organisations etc relating to the Rotherham Rapes
d) all information, internal e mails etc relating to EHRC investgations, reports, meeting relating to reports of the racial targeting of white children and young people for rapes by non-whites and ethnic gangs.
Thank you,
Add to Technorati Favorites

Sunday 9 November 2014

The Communion Cup

Kneel now my son, in snow, sand, dust and mud,
And sip from wars cold communion cup.
The warm wine runs red as poppy blush,
And flows from countless open wounds.
The bread is broken with bullets and bombs,
And swallowed by so many shallow graves.
Watch as the fallen now rise anew, reborn,
Whilst we linger in the silences they leave behind.
Add to Technorati Favorites

Wednesday 4 June 2014

Of God And Mothers.

A red tide of war arises upon reasons fatal fluxion,
Waves black with boats, a mass of guns and iron,
Holds filled with boys and men getting ready to rush upon body choked beaches,
Trembling with fear, they pray for Gods mercy or cry for their mothers.
It is dawn on D-Day and a dark day of atonement has now begun,
Its perilous birth baptised in fonts of blood, sweat and tears,
Where a hymn of hope, soft as a soldiers dying sigh, now eternally renews,
Amidst the wrecks and wave tangled wracks left by the ever turning tide.
Add to Technorati Favorites

Saturday 15 March 2014

The Right Spectrum

The continual call of The Right Sector as Far Right / Fascist / Uktra-Nationalist / Nazi / Nationalist etc prove that the media do not have a clue as to what either The Right Sector stand for politically or where they sit on the Nationalist spectrum.
I define below where most Right parties and movements sit.
The Right Spectrum is based on two forces Revolution and Reaction. One the Far Left we see the Socialist & Nationalist anti-corporate and anti-Imperialist impulse and the Far Right is designated by an Imperialist and Corporate impulse.
This allows us to place nationalist political parties and movements on a Left to Right scale based on Left Nationalist Revolutionary ideology to Reactionary Right ideology.
We shall start on the Left of the Right Spectrum.
A) Social Nationalist - eg Strasserite Left Revolutionary Social Nationalists. Anti-corporate, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist and nationalist.
B) National Socialism - the original ideology of the NSDAP in Germany prior to the expulsion of the National Socialist left by Hitler. Had its origins in a fusion of the Left & Right.
C) Conservatism - we can place this at the centre point of the spectrum. Do not confuse Conservatism with the Conservative Party in Britain, as the latter is now a social democratic party. Some conservatives seek to preserve things as they are, emphasizing stability and continuity, while others, called reactionaries, oppose modernism and seek a return to "the way things were ". The Conservatives who want things to remain stable are on the left of the Conservative wing, usually called 'the wets' or Red Tories and those who are the Dries, whose policies which came to be labelled as "dry" ones included foremostly reducing public spending, cutting taxes, lowering interest rates, tightly controlling the money supply, and reducing the regulatory power of the state – all policies which were closely associated with Thatcher.
D) Paleo-Conservatism - emphasis on tradition, limited government, civil society, anti-colonialism and anti-federalism, along with religious, regional, national and Western identity.
E) Nationalism - traditional nationalism relates to a protection of the people and the nation. Though the nation and people are seen as a unity, this is not based solely on an ethnic definition of the citizens of that nation. Those who are loyal to the nation are seen as one with the nation. Unlike Cultural Nationalism, which says only those who are culturally integrated into the nation and its culture can be members of the nation, nationalism allows other cultures to exist within the nation state as long as their loyalty is to the nation and the people of the nation itself - and not some other nation or their own ethnic interests.
F) Cultural Nationalism - as this does not explicitly relate to ethnic interests, it sits between Paleo-Conservatism & Ethnic Nationalism on the spectrum. Though the fact that it demands cultural integration and excludes those who may be loyal to the nation even though they are not culturally integrated means it sits on the right of the spectrum to Nationalism.
G) Ethnic Nationalism - as its focus relates to the protection and promotion of ethnic and cultural interests, it sits on the Right of the spectrum.
H) Fascism - Fascism was the merger of the State & the corporations. Hence its union with the corporations ensured the pre-dominance of corporate interests took precedence over the socialist impulse within Fascism. Hence it has to be placed in the Reactionary Right section of the spectrum. Fascism can also be imperialist.
I) Neo-Conservatism - this is included on the Far Right spectrum due to its imperialist, militarist, supra-national scope as way to promote US corporate interests. The fact that the movement has as much loyalty to Israel as America, means that it cannot be included within the definition of a Nationalist movement.
J) Hitlerism - Hitlerism is not National Socialism. It is fact the antithesis of National Socialism as it is the use of the State to profit the Capitalists and Industrialists via the use of war as a mechanism to increase corporate profits. Hitlerism was Supra-national in scope eg Greater German Reich & The New Order based on supra-national imperialist Pan-Aryanism.
So we can see that the placing of The Right Sector as a Fascist / Nazi / Hitlerite group is false.
They fit squarely into the Nationalist bracket.
Add to Technorati Favorites

Monday 10 March 2014

The Frankfurt School And The Truth

The origins of the Frankfurt School began with funding provided by the German Jewish Marxist Felix Weil.
Weil had been a student of the German Marxist proffessor Karl Korsch. Who was not Jewish.
Along with György Lukács, Karl Korsch is regarded as one of the major figures responsible for laying the groundwork for Western Marxism in the 1920s.
Karl Korsch was born in 1886 in Tostedt, near Hamburg in Germany. His father was a successful bank clerk and later a bank manager. Korsch went to school in Thuringia, and to university in Munich, Berlin, Geneva and Jena. Like Walter Benjamin, his first political experiences came as a member of the 'Free Student Movement', a broad, liberal and idealist organisation committed to the idea of transforming education in the interest of students.
On the outbreak of war, in August 1914, Karl Korsch returned to Germany. He claimed to have served in the war, while openly expressing his opposition to it. For this, he was demoted from the rank of reserve lieutenant to corporal. Korsch boasted that he never carried a rifle or sabre. Somehow he survived the hostility of his own commanding officers, and was twice decorated with the Iron Cross, for acts of bravery under fire.
The Frankurt School as it has come to be known, is actually The Institute For Social Research and was founded in 1923.
Its first head was Kurt Albert Gerlach. A German Marxist. Not a Jew. He died before the centre opened and was replaced by Carl Grunberg
Carl Grunberg was a German Marxist. He was Jewish.
The idea of the centre and its origins are described here ;
The Institute emerged from a week-long symposium held in Ilmenau, Germany in 1922. The First Marxist Workweek was organized and funded by German-Argentinean agricultural magnate Felix Weil with the purpose of combining the different trends of Marxism. The symposium was attended by Georg Lukács, Karl Korsch, Karl August Wittfogel, and Friedrich Pollock, among others. The event was reportedly so successful that Weil set about erecting a building and funding salaries for a permanent "Institute for Marxism" modeled upon the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow.
In 1923, with the help of the German Communist Party, the Institute for Social Research was opened at Frankfurt University with Carl Grünberg as its first Director.
The initial work at the Institute was oriented towards exploring Marxism as a scientific and economic methodology, but after the death of Grünberg and the temporary directorship of Pollock, Jewish Marxist Max Horkheimer was appointed the to the chair and changed the direction of the Institute from promoting an orthodox Marxist philosophy to what would later be called "cultural Marxism," better known as "political correctness."
Cultural Marxism is also known Critical Theory ;
Critical theory was first defined by Max Horkheimer of the Frankfurt School of sociology in his 1937 essay Traditional and Critical Theory: Critical theory is a social theory oriented toward critiquing and changing society as a whole, in contrast to traditional theory oriented only to understanding or explaining it. Horkheimer wanted to distinguish critical theory as a radical, emancipatory form of Marxian theory, critiquing both the model of science put forward by logical positivism and what he and his colleagues saw as the covert positivism and authoritarianism of orthodox Marxism and Communism
The ideological basis of critical theory comes from five Frankfurt School theoreticians: Herbert Marcuse, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Walter Benjamin, and Erich Fromm. Of these five only Adorno was not Jewish. All were Marxists.
Modern critical theory has been influenced by György Lukács and Antonio Gramsci as well as the second generation Frankfurt School scholars, including Jürgen Habermas.
Lukacs was a Jewish Marxist. Gramsci an Italian Marxist.
The current head of the Frankfurt School is Jurgen Habermas.
Habermas is a German Marxist whose father was a Nazi supporter. He is not Jewish.
So we can see from the above explanation of the Frankfurt School the following things ;
1) It was set up as a Marxist body to promote Marxism
2) every one of its founders were German and Marxists.
3) The aims of the organisation have always been to spread the ideas of Marxism into society.
Therefore the contention that the organisation is Jewish and serves Jewish interests is clearly false.
The organsations leadership is not united by one race, one nationality or one religion.
Its leadership is united by only one thing - their support for Marxism.
Which should come as a shock to non-one as it is an organisation set to represent Marxism.
Therefore we need to address two issues peddled by the White Nationalist movement that the Frankfurt School is a Jewish plot to destroy society and for Jews to control the West.
This is clearly false.
For a start the ideology spread by the Frankfurt School, Cultural Marxism, DOES NOT BENEFIT JEWS.
The basis of the contemporary LIBERAL society is LIBERAL. As a result of Liberalism and assimilation pushed by Liberalism derived from Cultural Marxism, the Jewish community is slowly being misceginated out of existence ;
It is Liberal Jews and Liberals who most oppose the most nationalistic and racist ideology supported by many Jews today - this being the racist Imperialist state of Israel and its Racist, Nationalistic, imperialistic ideology of Zionism.
Even within Israel vast swathes of the Jewish population, from anti-Zionist Orthodox Jews to Left Wing Liberal Jews oppose both the actions of the Israeli state and Zionism.
The Liberal values that these left wing Jews in Israel support find their origin in Cultural Marxism and the Frankfurt School.
It can even be said that without the ideological influence on Israel and Jews by the Frankfurt School and its Critical Theory / Cultural Marxism, that the Zionist Likudist Far Right in Israel and America would have no political or social opposition groups to oppose them and their activities at all.
The Liberal movement deriving from Cultural Marxism has been the primary fetter on the Eretz Israel Imperialist and Militarist expansionist policies of the Zionist Nationalist right.
If liberal Jews like Gilad Atzmon, Noam Chomsky and many others did not oppose Zionism both in Israel and America then Zionism would would have undoubtedly achieved most of its ideological aims in Israel, America and in relation to its expansionist foreign policy.
Now we need to look at why so many Jews in the 1920's and 1930's supported Marxism.
Thats a pretty easy issue to explain.
As a result of social, political and legal anti-Jewish and anti-semitic laws and violence many Jews across Europe saw Marxism as a mechanism to liberate themselves.
This is why Jews both in Germany & Russia embraced Marxism.
This iw why many Jews in Russia decided to embrace the Marxist Revolution that had swept Russia in 1917 and become either Bolsheviks or Mensheviks.
Many Jews in Russia had embraced the Bolshevik Party early on and had formed a significant proportion of its membership ;
The average party member was very young. In 1907, 22% of Bolsheviks were under 20, 37% were 20-24 and 16% were 25-29. By 1905, 62% of the members were industrial workers (3% of the population in 1897
22% of Bolsheviks were gentry (1.7% of the total population), 38% were uprooted peasants, compared with 19% and 26% for the Mensheviks. In 1907 78.3% of the Bolsheviks were Russian and 10% were Jewish (34% and 20% for the Mensheviks).
Total membership was 8,400 in 1905, 13,000 in 1906 and 46,100 by 1907 (8,400, 18,000, 38,200 respectively for the Mensheviks). By 1910 both factions together had fewer than 10,000 members.
But many Jews had also embraced the Menshevik Party as well.
An important issue to note re the Russian Revolution is that the Mensheviks had a far higher proportion of Jewish membership than the Bolsheviks - 20 % of the Mensheviks as opposed to the Bolsheviks 10 %
The primary opponents of the Bolsheviks WITHIN RUSSIA were the Mensheviks.
Menshevism was finally made illegal after the Kronstadt Uprising of 1921.
Therefore the idea that Jews ran the Bolsheviks and formed the majority of its membership is false.
What is also false is that the Jews all supported the Bolsheviks.
The primary party supported by Jews was the Mensheviks.
The Mensheviks fought against the Bolsheviks in the Kronstadt Rebellion of 1921 and were banned as a a result ;
The Kronstadt rebellion (Russian: Кронштадтское восстание, tr. Kronshtadtskoye vosstaniye) was a major unsuccessful uprising against the Bolsheviks in the later years of the Russian Civil War. Led by Stepan Petrichenko and consisting of Russian sailors, soldiers and civilians, the rebellion was one of the reasons for Vladimir Lenin's and the Communist Party's decision to loosen its control of the Russian economy by implementing the New Economic Policy (NEP).
The Mensheviks were led by a Jew ;
So the leader of a major uprising against Lenin and the Bolsheviks was a Jewish Menshevik leading a Menshevik movement with a far higher number of Jews in it than the Bolsheviks.
So the idea that Bolshevism was Jewish & supported by Jews is demonstrably false.
Note that the Bolshevik Party with the smallest percentage of Jews in it, lost and the Bolsheviks won.
So therefore the assertion that ;
1) As the Frankfurt Schools had a high number of Jews in it that they served Jewish interests as opposed to Marxist interests is false.
Jews in the early 20th century did not form a monolithic, cohesive bloc.
They were divided into Orthodox Jews, Nationalistic Zionist Jews and Communust Bolshevik, Menshevik and Liberal Marxist Jews. There were also atheist Jews, anarchist Jews and even fascist Jews such as the ones who supported Mussolini ;
Even Hitler had over 150,000 Jews fighting for Germany in WW2 ;
The soldier whose image of the ideal German Soldier used in Nazi magazines was also Jewish ;
Even the Number 2 in the leadership of Himmlers SS was Jewish ;
Even the British Union Of Fascists led Sir Oswald Mosley had Jewish members and candidates in elections.
So we can see that as far more Jews served in the German military for Hitler, then using the same logic of those who call the Frankfurt Schools 'Jewish' simply by counting Jews involved in the organisation, then using that exact same 'logic' that the Nazis and the Nazi movement were also Jewish and controlled by Jews.
The idiocy of 'counting Jews' as the basis of an proposition that an organisation serve Jewish interests, is about an asinine methodology one can imagine.
Jews are not The Borg from Star Trek. They do not share a Hive Mind nor do they all have a sense of ethno-communal loyalty only to their fellow Jews.
In fact such ethno-communalism that does exist, can be exploited by criminals within the Jewish community.
For an example of how some Jewish crooks can exploit Jewish ethno-communalism for their own advantage we need only to look at such criminals as ;
If the Frankfurt School was Jewish, then so too must have been the Fascists in Italy as many Jews in Italy supported, funded and were members of the Fascist movement.
THE PRIMARY POINT IS THIS - the Cultural Marxist movement that spawned Liberalism has not benefited the Jews in any way.
It has led to the formation of the Jewish Left who oppose Zionist Nationalism.
It has created the social dynamic towards Jewish assimilation that is misceginating much of the Jewish Community itself.
It has created the myriad liberal social dysfunction such as the epidemic of drug abuse that kills many Jewish young people in the entertainment industry in particular eg Amy Winehouse.
Cultural Marxism is as much a threat to Jewish social, political and ethnic communalism and genetic survival as it is to all those peoples exposed to it.
All the above information is based on facts.
If you think you can refute it then try.
If you are right, I will publish it.

Friday 7 March 2014

The Great Femen Lie

Image - Femen activists burn the SALAFIST black battle flag of Islam outside the Grand Mosque in France. They have bigger balls than most nationalists.
For years Nationalist have been told a series of systematic lies and propaganda that they believed uncritically. Like idiots we believed every lie. In fact we cheered them and welcomed them. Its okay.
I did too.
I was just as much an idiot as most people, either apolitical, right or left.
Instead of taking the time to educate myself about the reality and the truth, I too just accepted the lies and the propaganda like some insipid apathetic sponge.
After discovering how much I have been lied too though, trust me, I am never going to allow anyone to tell me what to think again.
Most especially I am not going to let the parade of halfwits, mostly so called White Nationalists, that posture as intellectuals in the Nationalist movement tell me what to think. Most of them are just as uncritically accepting of propaganda as the masses are.
The Great Lie I am referring too is the lie about Femen.
We all know about Femen right, a bunch of lefty birds who go topless to call for Communism in society.
This is Femen ;
1) They protest about the sexual slavery and trafficking of white, Ukranian and Eastern Europe by ethnic gangs across the European Union. They are fighting to defend white European women from being sold into sex slavery and trafficked like animals by vermin of all ethnicities across the EU. Anna Hutsol is credited as founding the FEMEN movement, on 10 April 2008, after she became aware of sad stories of Ukrainian woman duped into going abroad and then taken advantage of sexually.
2) They demand the criminalisation of prostitution to defend women across the EU.
3) FEMEN has protested "against the limitation of democratic liberties and freedom of the press" during Viktor Yanukovich's presidency[87] and against (Ukrainian) government corruption.
4) FEMEN protest actions have also taken place against alleged anti-Ukrainian policies by the Russian Orthodox Church and the Russian President and Government of Russia. It also demanded "independence for the Ukrainian church "
5) In the past (namely 2012) FEMEN had stated that its goals were "to develop leadership, intellectual and moral qualities of young women in Ukraine" and "to build up the image of Ukraine, [a] country with great opportunities for women.
6) In December 2012 FEMEN "warned" the European Union "to stop immediately political, economic and cultural contacts with Gazprom-Kremlin's dictatorship"; because "dependence on Nord Stream will bring Europe to an economic collapse and the abolition of visas requirements for Russians threatens Europe with a cultural Armageddon".[92] An 8 April 2013 "topless ambush" of Russian President Vladimir Putin (accompanied by German Chancellor Angela Merkel) at the Hanover trade fair was described by Alexandra Shevchenko as "non-violent women protesting against the most dangerous dictator in the world, it got great coverage and will hopefully inspire people in Russia as well as helping us to recruit new members.
7) The organization staged a topless protest at the 2012 Summer Olympics in London in opposition to "bloody Islamist regimes", which they accuse the IOC of supporting.[99] The protest included women in the clothing of Muslim men as well as signs stating "No Sharia"
8) FEMEN activists burned the Salafist flag in front of the Great Mosque of Paris on 3 April 2013
9) They fight against Islamism and against the repression of women in the West and abroad who are repressed and attacked and by Islamist thugs.
Femen of course opposes abortion, but just I demand the right to full autonomy over my own body, so too I must accept a womans right for the same.
I may oppose the idea of abortion, as is my right, but I have no right to demand women do as I wish in relation to their bodies.
After doing the research on Femen I discovered something that made me realise their hostility to the Russian Orthodox Church which also controls the Ukranian Church.
Its not because they are anti-Christian. Far from it. They want a Christian church hierarchy that are Christian.
The head of the Russian Orthodox and Ukranian Church is an ex KGB agent who infiltrated the church to spy and inform on his fellow priests.
Want proof ?
Here it is ;
Many in the Orthodox hierarchy are also accused of working as KGB informers, a fact that critics say the Church has never fully acknowledged.
"Essentially, the Orthodox Church is one of the only Soviet institutions that has never been reformed," said one priest, who declined to be identified for fear that he could be defrocked. That fate already befell another colleague, Gleb Yakunin, in the 1990s when he called on Church leaders with KGB links to repent.
So by fighting against the Russian Orthodox Church, which is exactly what Pussy Riot are doing, they are in fact fighting against a false church run by an ex-KGB agent who Works with Putin, the ex-head of the KGB.
Instead of attacking Femen & Pussy Riot as commies, they are in fact fighting against the Putin Imperialist state and its ex-KGB Kleptocracy and associated oligarchs, plutocrats and gangsters.
Apart from the issue of abortion, every Nationalist will agree that none of the Femen positions are anti-nationalist.
We do not support Putins control of European gas supplies for instance. We are Nationalists, we demand that every nations puts in place its own sustainable energy supply systems to ensure we do not need to rely on foreign nations for energy supplies that then drags into Imperialist Oil Wars such as in Iraq & Afghanistan.
Putins control of European gas via the Ukrainian pipeline is not just a threat to the EU, Putin has already used the threat to stop the gas supplies in members of his Eurasian Union.
Putin uses Russian energy supplies as a way to terrorise and control nations that depend on Russian energy supplies.
We do not want to rely on Russian, Saudi or Israeli oil or gas.
We demand national energy independence.
Nationalists have allowed the media, Putin and morons within the Nationalist movement itself many of them with an agenda, to lie to us, deceive us and manipulate us.
Femen are not our allies. That is true.
But neither are they our enemy.
Instead of attacking Femen and Pussy Riot, and supporting the Putin supporting vermin who do this to their supporters in Russia - we should let them get on with their project to bring down Putin and his evil Shadow Soviet Union.
Attacks like this on Pussy Riots members such as in the video link below which were perpetrated by by pro-Putin Anti-Fascist red members of his anti-Fascist youth organisation NASHI are disgusting ;
That is Putinism.
On 19 December 2011 FEMEN performed a topless protest against Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko outside the KGB Headquarters in Minsk, mocking Lukashenko's recognizable haircut and moustache.Afterwards, according to FEMEN, the three protesters Inna Shevchenko, Oksana Shachko and Aleksandra Nemchinova were abducted by the Belarus authorities and taken to a remote forest blindfolded, doused with oil, forced to strip and then threatened with being set on fire, before having their hair violently cut with knives and being abandoned in the snow half-naked
Is that what nationalists are supposed to support ? Attacks like this on our daughters, cousins and women by the same anti-fascist pro-Putin thugs doing this to young nationalists in the Ukraine ;
That is what cowards do, not men.
These are the same Cossack pro-Putin thugs standing alongside the anti-fascist mobs attacking Nationalists in the Ukraine, who did this to Pussy Riot in the Olympics ;
The very same cossacks whose ancestors were murdered by Communists now prostrate themselves before Putin and his false Church and fight alongside pro-Communist mobs in Crimea ;
Now Cossack 'men' beat young girls with horse whips and some nationalists cheer that.
Each is as ugly and stupid as the other.
Russia has lost its honour and soul under Putin.
It has become a pitiful whore to his propaganda and the most shallow and pernicious form of reactionary right Plastic Patriotism.
As long as some retard waves a plastic Russian Flag, the Putin retarded masses will salute it and follow it.
That is not Nationalism.
That is the antithesis of everything that Nationalism and Nationalists stand for.

Thursday 6 March 2014

Putin Imperialism, Yeltsin & The Lie Of Legality

One of the primary problems of a dumbed down education system is that it creates a dumbed down population.
Hence why the average person has the mental capacity of a hamster and the memory of a goldfish.
Not even the politicians, journalists and political commentators have a memory or historical vision that allows them to understand contemporary international issues like the Ukranian Revolution.
In 1993 Boris Yeltsinj ordered an attack on the Russian parliament.
The constitutional crisis of 1993 was a political stand-off between the Russian president and the Russian parliament that was resolved by using military force. The relations between the president and the parliament had been deteriorating for some time. The constitutional crisis reached a tipping point on September 21, 1993, when President Boris Yeltsin aimed to dissolve the country's legislature (the Congress of People's Deputies and its Supreme Soviet), although the president did not have the power to dissolve the parliament according to the constitution. Yeltsin used the results of the referendum of April 1993 to justify his actions. In response, the parliament declared that the president's decision was null and void, impeached Yeltsin and proclaimed vice president Aleksandr Rutskoy to be acting president.
The situation deteriorated at the beginning of October. On October 3, demonstrators removed police cordons around the parliament and, urged by their leaders, took over the Mayor's offices and tried to storm the Ostankino television centre. The army, which had initially declared its neutrality, by Yeltsin's orders stormed the Supreme Soviet building in the early morning hours of October 4, and arrested the leaders of the resistance.
The ten-day conflict became the deadliest single event of street fighting in Moscow's history since the revolutions of 1917.[1] According to government estimates, 187 people were killed and 437 wounded, while estimates from non-governmental sources put the death toll at as high as 2,000.
This action by Yeltsin has direct legal consequences for the actions of the Russians in the Ukraine.
The attack by Yeltsin to topple the ELECTED Russian government was illegal under the Russian Constitution.
It breached the terms of the constitution of the Russian State.
Yet the West and the Russian government of Yeltsin that replaced the former government regarded Yeltsins actions as lawful.
Therefore the exact same scenario applies in relation to the Ukraine.
The former leader of the Ukraine fled the country and after his departure a new government was formed to replace the previous one.
In this case the Ukranian people, as opposed to a single tyrant using the army eg Yeltsin, did the toppling of the government.
The fact that the former government of Russia then had no legal authority to issue any laws or decrees was affirmed by Yeltsin.
The same situation now applies in the Ukraine.
The former government have no legal authority, using the exact same legal principles as used by Yeltsin, to issue any request to Russia for them to invade the Ukraine or to undertake any actions in the Ukraine that conflict with the pre-existing legal agreements in place relating to Russian use of Ukranian territory in the Crimea.
Putins decision to regard the request of Yanukovych as the order of a legal government is in fact unlawful.
The fact is that regardless of Yeltsin being the Russian president AT THE TIME, the Russian Constitution stated that the President did not have the power to remove the Russian Parliament - especially by using the army and tanks to shell the Parliament building, murder hundreds of people and put members of the Parliament in Prison.
Therefore there is no legal authority for Putin to regard the orders of Yanukovych as the expression of a government that still retains power in the Ukraine, neither in fact or law or in regard to the legal principle as defined by Yeltsin in the 1993 toppling of Parliament.
The actions of Russia are therefore illegal under not just Russian law, but Ukranian law and international law.
The basis of this is the fact that the legal principle stating that the toppling of a government illegally can be legal is the legacy of the modern Russian state itself.
In the ongoing Ukranian example ;
1) the surrender of power and the fleeing of the Yanukovych government from Ukraine
2) the issuing of illegal orders to Russia
3) and the ongoing illegal actions of Russia in the Ukraine as mandated by Yanukovych
also ensure that the previous government cannot claim any legal authority in regard to their assertion that they are the legal government of the Ukraine.
Add to Technorati Favorites