BBC Con Trick - The White Season

Image - This is not Andrew Marr though it does look like him. These are BBC mugs and there are plenty of those in the BBC.









The BBC 'White Season' of films is as usual nothing but a con.

The 'White British Working Class' terminology that the BBC are supposedly seeking to represent in this documentary series do not exist - this is because the term 'white british' applies to EVERY white person in the country - from Poles to Lithuanians to Russians and Germans.

In this country there are ;

1) The Indigenous British who are Indigenous English, Welsh, Irish and Scottish and a mixture of all of them

2) Assimilated White British who are not indigenous but British in culture, values and way of life and who love Britain eg Poles who have taken on British citizenship

3) Assimilated Non-White British who are not indigenous but British in culture, values and way of life and who love Britain eg Jamaican Christians who have taken up British citizenship after being raised in the British Commonwealth

4) and then the rest of the people in this country who are neither assimilated nor British though they may possess little bits of paper called passports that say they are British but that are in fact passports for colonists to colonise our country in the name of Political Correctness and Multi-Culturalism. They are colonists not British Citizens.

We repudiate the nonsense of a catergory of White British as genocidal, racist claptrap designed to ensure the indigenous people of Britain are deined their right to exist as recognised ethnic communities.

If we accept the term White British as legitimate then we accept the CRE definition of the law that everyone who is white can be British and that the interests of the Indigenous English, Welsh, Irish and Scots as racial, ethnic and national groups do not need to be taken into consideration.

The BBC and the government demand that all other racial and ethnic groups that they are taught about their specific ethnic culture, history and identity - but this is denied for the Indigenous English, Welsh, Scots and Irish.

They are fed PC pap about mass immigration and Britishness.

We demand that the White English Indigenous Children of Britain ( and the White Indigenous Welsh, Irish and Scottish children) are taught their ethnic history, not PC crap.

Instead of being taught about who we are, instead we are being fed some bullshit 'inclusive' definition of White British by the BBC that seeks to replace the narratives of our indigenous histories as English, Welsh, Irish and Scots with one that includes the story of all those non-British peoples that have entered the country.

This is why the series is about White British and ot about the Indigenous British.

A White British identity means nothing - it merely denies English, Welsh, Scots and Irish children their unique ethnic community status, cultures and history and allows the BBC to replace their identities with a bogus PC version of Britishness that includes Poles, Russian etc etc just because they are white.

The notion of the White British means that the BBC can impose Positive Discrimination policies for ethnics as they do not have to investigate whether the interests of the English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish in the BBC are being met. Seeing as the English are not even mentiond on census and race forms then how can their interests as a community be met - until we are recognised as existing then our interests are denied and forgotten.

The fact that all Whites are lumped together into the racist definition of White British is in itself racist - just as is the concept of Black British. They both imply that the only thing that matters for the group is skin colour and that the various national and ethnic differences between the members of those groups are irrelevant.

Jamaicans and Africans are not the same just because they are black and nor are Irish of ethnic Irish descent and Northern Irish of ethnic English descent. Just because both are white or black does not mean they are the same or have the same interests.

Under the racist blanket terms like White British then the rights of the Indigenous English and even their status as existing is denied.

Using the phrase White British means ;

1) The interests of the Indigenous English, Welsh, Scots and Irish need not be considered

2) That our children are not taught their ethnic and cultural history but rather a bland PC version of Britishness

3) That aliens and immigrants if they are white cn be classified as White British and the rights of the Indigenous British not considered

Using the definition of White British means that the mass migration of Poles into the UK over recent years means that this is now part of our historical narrative as regards PC Britishness - and not what it should be regarded as which is an economic invasion.

The phrase White British means that as soon as those Poles in Britain apply for a passport then hey presto they become White British.

Whilst Poles can get passports to call themselves British, the Indigenous English, Welsh, Irish and Scots cannot get their status as Indigenous Britons stamped on their passports.

The law as it stands recognises the existence of the English as a National, Ethnic Group and a racial group but does not give us any protection under the race relations acts and laws as regards our civil and social and legal rights - and we therefore demand the recognition of the Indigenous English, Indigenous Welsh, Indigenous Irish and Indigenous Scottish people as RACIAL, ETHNIC and NATIONAL groups under the terms of the Race Relations Act in the UK and that we be recognised as existing both in law and in practice.

This is because the term White British allows the government to define anyone white as British and also because the term white british is used to deny the existence of the indigenous peoples of these British Isles as even existing in any legal way and thereby allows the CRE and government to pass off foreigners as English, welsh, scots and irish.

This term White British is nonsense, as Poles and Russians are not British even though they are defined as such by the term White British.

Though Poles and Russians may become British Citizens through marriage and assmiliation, the fact remains that Poles, though white, are NOT indigenous British.

Even if they had a British passport they would still be Poles with a British passport. They could become British Citizens , but not Indigenous Britons.

They are welcome to the join the BNP as our equals if they are British Citizens as they are fellow Europeans and fellow British Citizens, but they are not Indigenous British and Indigenous Britons.

The term Indigenous British and Indigenous Britons applies only to the descendants of the Indigenous British, whilst the term White British means the indigenous British people may not as well exist.

If all of Poland entered the UK and the whole of Britain moved to Poland then under the BBC and CRE definition of White British - the Poles would become British and the British become Poles. This is of course a nonsensical and almost genocidal position.

The term white british should be repaced by the term INDIGENOUS BRITONS and used to cover ONLY the RACIAL, ETHNIC AND NATIONAL GROUPS the Indigenous English, the Indigenous Welsh, the Indigenous Irish and the Indigenous Scottish and also those who are of mixed blood of those indigenous ethnic groups.

If this is done the indigenous British peoples would come under the full protection of the Race Relations Acts.

The term white british is a term recognised by the CRE as covring all those who are white in Britain, and this means it is not related in any way to the interests of the indigenous communities of this country.

This is why the British National Party Constitution was changed in order to define the indigenous British as the indigenous English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish peoples of our Islands.

This BBC season should have been about the Indigenous White English Working Class, as it is the Indigenous White English working Class who have borne the brunt of mass immigration - not the White British Working Class who as a class do not exist.

Mass immigration has primarily impacted on England and not Wales, Ireland or Scotland and not on the White British.


Our Demands ;


1) That the Indigenous British be recognised in law as covering the existence only of the indigenous English, Irish , Welsh and Scottish peoples as members of those ethnic, racial and national groups and as Indigenous Britons. That only the descendants of Indigenous Britons may be classified as Indigenous Britons or as Indigenous members of the ethnic, racial and national groups of England, Wales, ireland and Scotland that they be allowed to self define themselves as members of, or as Mixed Indigenous British.

2) That the law gives full rights to the members of those indigenous ethnic, racial and national groups under the Race Relations Act

3) That the term White British be prohibited as being used on ethnic and racial monitoring forms and replaced by Indigenous English, Indigenous Welsh, Indigenous Irish and Indigenous Scottish and Mixed Indigenous British.

4) That the legal definition of Indigenous Britons apply only to those who are from the indigenous racial, national and ethnic communities of the Britain and that this be stamped on our passports. Our passports must state that we are indigenous Britons - and not just British Citizens or slaves of the EU

5) That the indigenous status of the Indigenous English, Welsh, Irish and Scots be recognised in British and International law.

6) That the Indigenous English, Welsh, Irish and Scots be taught their own culture, history and identity in schools and not fed a PC version of fake Britishness.

7) That the term White British be used to describe in law only those who are of non-indigenous backgrounds, who are white and who have fully assimilated into Britain and British culture and who have been given British Passports



The BNP represents the interests of the Indigenous British People but also all those groups of ASSIMILATED White British Citizens and also all those Non-White ASSIMILATED British Citizens who have rejected the insane cult of Multi-Culturalism and who are totally British in character and culture.

Assimilation means respecting the fact that in Britain the British people make our laws, our culture comes first and that our way of life takes precedence over all others and that people either assimilate into our country and obey our laws and ways or they leave.

Those people from the Old Commonwealth who are Black, Christian and British by culture have been sold out by the cult of political correctnesss and multi-culturalism. They have seen Britain abandon all those virtues that they came here for in the first place.

They came here because Britain was BRITISH, because the British people rulEd their own country and because Britain had a BRITISH culture and was ruled by the British people for the benefit of the British people.

They have seen the indigenous British traitors amongst us and their alien allies surrender our country, liberties and culture to multi-culturalism, the US, UN and the EU and have seen the loss and abandonment of our British culture and Identity.

The BNP represent not only the Indigenous British Peoples but also all those that put BRITAIN FIRST and BRITISH CULTURE FIRST regardless of their race, colour or creed.

Those that respect and love Britain and British culture are our allies and friends regardless of their race, colour or creed, but those who are of our own blood and who have betrayed us are our enemies.

Those who do not assimilate are colonists and colonisers NOT BRITISH CITIZENS !

The Cranks in British Nationalism

I was sent an e mail this morning from someone concerning a posting by the demented harridan and banshee Sharon Ebanks

(daughter of black West Indian immigrant Radwell Ebanks http://icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/sundaymercury/news/tm_objectid=17216617&method=full&siteid=50002&headline=family-secret-of-bnp-s-sharon-name_page.html - note the jawline, she looks just like her dad )

which had been posted on the website of the known Marixist and red grass Peter Rushton. In the post on Rushtons website the demented banshee had made accusations that I had drafted up the letter to Mike Easter which had been the basis of his dismissal from the BNP.

As usual this was complete bollocks. I have had ZERO input on the Mike Easter case and as usual this was pure crap disseminated into the sewers of the internet to feed the rats that infest the sites where it was posted. The fact that any Nationalists have any time at all for the insane ramblings of this ethnically 'diverse' lunatic in the grip of an ethno-masochistic psychosis amazes me. Then again the gullibility and stupidity of some British nationalists is amazing to behold.

This is a woman who actually sent the BNP officer responsible for dealing with her disciplinary an e mail that said she was going to be represented in her BNP disciplinary Tribunal by 'a Chief Constable ' !!!! The word 'delusional' comes to mind. Either that or she was going to be represented by the Chief Constable of the West Midlands - which raise some interesting questions in itself.

Over the years I have seen the tide of nationalism ebb and flow and seen what strange creatures have washed up on our shores.

Take Adrian Davis for example, the Barrister who represented David Irving in his libel case a few years ago and helped him lose his home and savings. The only winner was Adrian Davis who got his legal fees. Irving later called Davis 'incompetent' on his website.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/738453.stm

This a man who recent escapades include ;

1) Taking on a libel case involving Tess Culnane that lost her £80,000 pounds. Luckily the Liberal Democrats took pity on her and decided not to take her house from her. The ony winner was Adrian Davis who got his legal fees.

2) Taking on a libel case for Jay Lee that resulted in him having to drop his right to claim damages from the ASLEF union for unlawful expulsion ( a case which I won in the Employment Tribunal ) with the net result that the only winner was Adrian Davis who got his legal fees.

3) Taking on a case for John Tyndall to get him back into the BNP after he was expelled that resulted in costs for the BNP and also costs for John Tyndall ( the ony winner again being Adrian Davis who got his legal fees )

4) Taking on the Chris and Barry Roberts case against Searchlight which resulted in them having to pay £150,000 in costs and having to sell their houses. The only winner was Adrian davis who got his legal fees.

5) He is presently taking on the Simon Shepherd and Luke Farrell case. Though Simon Shepherd and Luke Farrell are obviously people with significant mental health issues ( Simon Shepherd is particularly fond of Cannibalism stories on his insane website and is well known as one of the world leading misogynists )the fact that Adrian Davis has been hired to represent them perhaps should be entered in their please for mitigation as proof of the extent of their illness.In the first pre-trial hearing on the important issue of the courts jurisdiction as regards posting on an internet server and website located in the US, the judge held that the comments posted by Shepherd and Farrell were within the jurisdiction of the Uk and therefore within the jurisdiction of the court to hear.

What amazes me is that so far no-one has realised the implications of this decision by the Judge to allow the case to go ahead. It means that whatever you post on the internet in the UK, regardless of where the server or website is physically hosted in the world, then you are liable under the Public Order Act 1986 in Britain for those comments.

Though the POA 1986 was never designed to cover the whole planet, and was enacted before most people had even heard of the Internet, the judge has held that the whole world now comes under the remit of the POA 1986. Talk about judicial activism and legal creativity. Thanks to the work of Adrian Davis this means the Internet has now come under the remit of the UK law. The last refugse of free speech in the so called Free World which was the internet ( " If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky )has now been lost to the enemy of all those that cherish and value free speech.

This means, in the event of them being found guilty, that the Internet is no longer a place where free speech reigns. Thanks Adrian - great work ( NOT ! )

The Chris and Barry Roberts case was also a particularly interesting case to examine. The case against the BNP activists Chris and Barry Roberts was heard before Judge Sir Stephen Sedley, a long time member of the British Communist Party and President of the British Institute of Human Rights with links to Liberty and Amnesty International.

http://www.bihr.org/about/advisory.html

Under the dicta enshrined in the Pinochet Principle in Re Pinochet (1998) http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199899/ldjudgmt/jd990115/pino01.htm the Judge should have withdrawn from the case as a long time member of the Communist Party can scarcely be said to be ambivalent to nationalism and nationalist activists in their court.

This is what the case dicta says ;

" 2. Apparent bias

As I have said, Senator Pinochet does not allege that Lord Hoffmann was in fact biased. The contention is that there was a real danger or reasonable apprehension or suspicion that Lord Hoffmann might have been biased, that is to say, it is alleged that there is an appearance of bias not actual bias.

The fundamental principle is that a man may not be a judge in his own cause. This principle, as developed by the courts, has two very similar but not identical implications. First it may be applied literally: if a judge is in fact a party to the litigation or has a financial or proprietary interest in its outcome then he is indeed sitting as a judge in his own cause. In that case, the mere fact that he is a party to the action or has a financial or proprietary interest in its outcome is sufficient to cause his automatic disqualification. The second application of the principle is where a judge is not a party to the suit and does not have a financial interest in its outcome, but in some other way his conduct or behaviour may give rise to a suspicion that he is not impartial, for example because of his friendship with a party. This second type of case is not strictly speaking an application of the principle that a man must not be judge in his own cause, since the judge will not normally be himself benefiting, but providing a benefit for another by failing to be impartial.

In my judgment, this case falls within the first category of case, viz where the judge is disqualified because he is a judge in his own cause. In such a case, once it is shown that the judge is himself a party to the cause, or has a relevant interest in its subject matter, he is disqualified without any investigation into whether there was a likelihood or suspicion of bias. The mere fact of his interest is sufficient to disqualify him unless he has made sufficient disclosure: see Shetreet, Judges on Trial, (1976), p. 303; De Smith, Woolf & Jowel, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, 5th ed. (1995), p. 525. I will call this "automatic disqualification."

" The rationale of the whole rule is that a man cannot be a judge in his own cause. In civil litigation the matters in issue will normally have an economic impact; therefore a judge is automatically disqualified if he stands to make a financial gain as a consequence of his own decision of the case. But if, as in the present case, the matter at issue does not relate to money or economic advantage but is concerned with the promotion of the cause, the rationale disqualifying a judge applies just as much if the judge's decision will lead to the promotion of a cause in which the judge is involved together with one of the parties. Thus in my opinion if Lord Hoffmann had been a member of AI he would have been automatically disqualified because of his non-pecuniary interest in establishing that Senator Pinochet was not entitled to immunity. Indeed, so much I understood to have been conceded by Mr. Duffy. "

This rule for Judges is in place in order to ensure that there is no chance of any judicial bias in legal cases. The law requires that Judges ‘ Must not appear biased or impartial ‘ .

The Judges past adherence to the Communist cause in the Barry and Chris Roberts case meant the Judge was not fit to hear a case involving well known Nationalist activists for the BNP involved in a libel case against a well known Communist election candidate and Communist supporter - this being the convicted liar and thief Gerry Gable of the Searchlight magazine. The fact that the Judge is president of a legal group that supports left wing legal proffesionals who use the law for political purposes should also have meant he should have withdrawn. But instead of withdrawing from the case Judge Sir Stephen Sedley , and the other two judges on the bench hearing the appeal, found against the BNP members and at the same time ‘clarified‘ the position of the libel laws in the UK to ensure that the Roberts brothers and other British Nationalists in the future did not come under its protection. In effect the judgement said ' Searchlight can now print any old load of lies and bollocks it gets off the internet and publish it with impunity '.

If one employee of Searchlight is sitting in one room of Searchlies office in London posting lies on Stormfront under the psuedonym 'Hitlers Left Bollock ' such as saying that a BNP member is hiding the body of Heinrich Himmler in their fridge and that said body of dead nazi defrosted and was present at the RWB and signing copies of Mein Kampf, then Searchlies can now print that in their rag and not face being sued by the person they name as storing the body in the freezer. The good judge has give the media and searchlight a license to peddle as much bullshit about the BNP as they wish and now they need never fear being sued.
What a farce.

The Roberts Brothers were not told of the Judges political affiliations. The law required that Judge Sir Stephen Sedley do one of two things ;

1) Either withdraw from the case

2) Disclose his past affiliations to the Communist Party and give the claimants the right to decide whether he should withdraw.

Neither was done. But at the same time neither was the judge challenged by adrian Davis as per his suitability to hear the case.

Judge Sir Stephen Sedley was the senior Judge on the appeal hearing the Roberts case, this meant his comments and opinions would have borne great weight with the other less senior judges hearing the case. The fact he neither withdrew from the case , nor was he challenged by Adrian Davis as per his suitability to hear the case, is a disgrace.

The British Institute of Human Rights on its website even hosts articles attacking the BNP !

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:6NcII4ZQ-IYJ:www.bihr.org/downloads/Lecture-Narey.pdf+bnp&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:9xxJrp8P6igJ:www.bihr.org/downloads/newsletters/bihr_news_summer03.pdf+bnp&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:cGtvxu3zzmoJ:www.bihr.org/downloads/Lecture-Moraes.pdf+bnp&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1

http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:PcmNK9CXURsJ:www.bihr.org/downloads/letter050506.pdf+SIR+STEPHEN+SEDLEY&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3

Also one of the current trustees of the Institute of Human Rights is Geoffrey Bindman of Bindman and Co, the same legal firm that represented Shahid Malik ( now a Labour MP ) in his libel case against former BNP activist Steve Smith.

http://www.bihr.org/

http://www.bihr.org/about/trustees.html


In 2005 the CRE Deputy Chair Sarah Smith gave a speech at the Institute of Human Rights - and this was after the CRE had said it was going to target the BNP.

http://www.cre.gov.uk/default.aspx.locid-0hgnew04a.Lang-EN.htm

http://www.cre.gov.uk/Default.aspx.LocID-0hgnew0nu.RefLocID-0hg00900c002.Lang-EN.htm

Now the question is - why didnt Davis challenge the Judges right to hear the case ?

What is very interesting is that Adrian Davis and Lord Justice Sedley had met before - it was Judge Sedley that refused David Irving permission to appeal his libel case.

http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/Appeal/refusal.html

Now isnt that an interesting coincidence - Lord Justice Sedley refused Irving permission to appeal his case and Adrian Davis was Irvings barrister in the libel case.

http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/Appeal/SedleyLJ/profile1.html

http://www.fpp.co.uk/docs/Irving/RadDi/RadDi170101.html

For those that are interested Adrian Davis posts on Stormfront under the name Insurgent - http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=408864

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=357733

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=376704

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=319294

Snippets from the News

The Liberal Loonies led by Ming the Muppet want to have an amnesty for illegal immigrants. The last thing this country needs is more Liberalism and more Immigrants. Thankfully the fossil that leads the party of the idiot fringe will not get elected into any serious position of power.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article2485434.ece

For an example of how our country and civilisation is facing problems because of failure to create a society and communities based on nature, as opposed to ideology, the article below is very interesting.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article2484976.ece

The menopause exists to ensure that women have free time to help to look after their young grandchildren, new research has suggested.

A study of two African villages stretching back to 1950 has found that children have a distinct survival advantage if they have a maternal grandmother with no infants of her own to help their mother to look after them.

The results appear to support the evolutionary theory that the menopause emerged as a means of ensuring that young mothers have extra help while bringing up their children. An alternative theory suggests that the menopause occurs to reduce the risk older women face of dying in childbirth.

This is evidence of the neccesity for a nation state based on Communities rather than the facile notion of Society as promulgated by the current political elites. What we need to do is create a country based on communities with extended families and kin based communities. This means Grandmothers would be living in the same communities with their extended families offering them support and guidance instead of miles away in distant towns or in other countruies due to them white flighting the country. Instead of the Politically Correct Nannny State running the country we could have the Nanny Family where the family takes care of the family instead of the State taking charge of parenting in order to brainwash our children into being little PC Robots.

Top Cops Wake Up.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=NWTUCVQPSREOBQFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/09/19/nmigrant119.xml

Apparently the Police are worried about immigrant crime affecting their performance targets and hence their politicalyl correct Brown Nosing promotions and pensions ( for the rules of promotion these days in the police the rules are blame white racists for everything even race attacks on whites and insert nose firmly up the arse of the nearest Labour politician ) . Instead of arresting Kittens for Criminal Damage for attacking balls of wool, the Police have realised that they have to do a real job and arrest those things called criminals. As this means getting involved in policing instead of pretending to be social workers in uniform, this means a few of them have come into contact with these things called 'criminals' and some of these ( SHOCK ! HORROR ) are FOREIGNERS. Therefore the police now want more money (AS USUAL) to do the bloody job they should have been doing all along. Useless bastards.

Even The Guardian is on the story with this article - http://www.guardian.co.uk/crime/article/0,,2172376,00.html - which links Immigrants with knife crime and drink driving. Soon the Guardian is going to release a story on the link between breathing and oxygen.

Between 2003 and 2004 the number of foreign nationals arrested in the county for drink-driving soared from 57 to 966, although it has since fallen by two-thirds. ( Probably because all the drink drivers are now on benefits and can afford to get cabs or they use the police as taxis to drive them back from the pub at night and then get tucked up in bed bythe cops, read a story in their own language by the coppers and then given a police regulation teddy bear. )

In another example of the bloody obvious resold as 'news' the article below is also interesting

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/19/ncre119.xml

The C.R.E says the nation is fractured - well they should know seeing as they are the mechanism that has been used to destroy our country, society and communities. Multi-Culturalism destroys communities, immigration destroys countries and the C.R.E has been the fascist enforcement mechanism to ensure any dissent is criminalised and dissidents are imprisoned.

With all the powers of the old witchunters the CRE during the time of the New Cromwell ( Blair ) went around the country looking for witches (racists ) and devilry ( racism ) - and with their own special powers of perception saw witches and devilry everywhere ( Institutional Racism ). Trevor Phillips, or The Witchfinder General, as we who hold him in contempt call him, then went out from town to town burning witches in public ( sacking them from their jobs ) if they wore the sign of the devil on their clothes ( the badge of england such as on the lapel of the sacked HMP prison officer ) or wore the sign of the devil ( a Union Jack Tattoo ) on their skin ( football fans who tried to leave the country during England games ).

The wankers that ran the CRE ( such as Furball Singh the drunk cricket hooligan who threatened to headbutt a copper http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2177809.stm) are the reason why we have Fractured Society. After the hearing Singh was obliged to tender his resignation from his £100,000 a year job and, although he was given a £115,000 pay off, his career was effectively over. He had a nice tax payers cheque for being sacked (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2179802.stm ).

A hundred grand a year for Ghostbusting ( looking for the phantoms of institutional racism that the proffessional hysterics and shysters of the race relations industry see everywhere ) is a nice little earner. Only drug dealers , wankers in the media and the race relations industry earn that sort of dough a year.

The good news though is that Singh is now in Iraq ( http://www.rediff.com/news/2004/jan/05shyam.htm ) Singh is only one of four British officials to be appointed to a six-figure salary job in the new Iraqi administration being set up with the help of the US Agency for International development (USAID).

Oh the joys of being an ethnic minority in the UK. One law for them, one law for us - as bloody usual.

The Wall Comes Down

The Wall Comes Down.

There are moments in history when one can visibly see the wall that divided the people from the political elite coming down. 1989 was such a moment when we watched the Berlin Wall being smashed down by Germans citizens who had been divided from one another since the end of the Second World War by East German Soviet Union politicians.

This week the first leaks in the wall of liberal lies that has separated this country from reality could finally be seen. This trickle is the first sign of an imminent flood that will soon undermine the entire liberal consensus and its foundations.

The first moment of truth being set free from amidst the snarl of lies was a report from the Ministry of Justice published here ; http://www.justice.gov.uk/called Diversity and Fairness in the Jury system.

As reported in the Times (1) this report reveals that " Jurors of all races are more lenient to ethnic minority defendants in court in an attempt to compensate for perceived bias in the criminal justice system, according to a report published today.

Black and ethnic minority jurors are significantly less likely to convict a black or Asian defendant than a white defendant in certain cases.

"Race leniency" appeared to reflect a belief among black and Asian jurors that the courts treat defendants more harshly if they are from an ethnic minority, the report said.

It said that jurors attempted to deal with the perceived bias in the criminal justice system by trying to create a "level playing field" for ethnic minority defendants.

But the report, by the Ministry of Justice, said that such bias appeared to operate only in cases where race was not a factor in the prosecution.

"White jurors showed some same-race leniency towards white defendants, but again this was present only in cases where race was not an explicit element of the case," it said.

"Both black and Asian jurors showed leniency for the black defendant, but there was no evidence of leniency for the Asian defendant by either Asian or black jurors."

In other words, the constant lie repeated ad neaseum by Liberals, the BBC and the Labour Party for years that poor Ethnic Minorities are not getting fair trials in court due to racism was nothing but the biggest load of BS we have ever been forced to swallow as a society.

The second big lie is the one promulgated by the Liberal Elite and its political lackeys that stop and search by the Police is evidence of police racism. In 1995 the then Met Police Cheif Paul Condon revealed that 80 % of muggings in London were by blacks. This report has now vanished down the Internet memory hole, I have spent twenty minutes trying to find copies of the article but they have vanished.It appears they didnt fit the big lie that the politicians want to portray that the police and criminal justice system are racists.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6753695.stm

For ten years we have had imposed upon the institutions of our nation a racist, violent and revolutionary Marxist ideal called Institutional Racism. This doctrine was a revolutionary plan to take over the institutions of our society in a way that bypassed the requirement for a political mandate.

Instead of the people voting for change via the political the process, the process was imposed via the institutions of society.

Political Power is an illusion, unless it can be applied.

Political Correctness and the lie of Institutional Racism allowed the left to take power at the level of the institutions who apply power in our nation without any electoral mandate for them to do.

It has enacted a revolution in our nation, whilst millions of people scuttled past with their heads down and kept silent.

One of the defining lies of Institutional Racism, and one that has been accepted with uncritical obedience by the so called ' chattering classes' is that the Court system is institutionally racist and oppresses those poor, dear, ethnic minority chappies and chappesses.

This lie is the basis of the 'Suffering Noble Ethnic' image of ethnic minorities in this country that the liberal idiots like to portray to the public. The fetishised image of the noble and suffering ethnic minority victim of white injustice is the defining symbol of the Post-Imperial guilt stricken idiot and Multi-Cultural Society.

It has in fact become a syndrome amongst the liberals, that can be recognised and clinically assessed. Read the article here ;

Psychology and White Ethnocentrism Kevin MacDonald http://theoccidentalquarterly.com/

This syndrome is the ' Suffering Ethnic Syndrome' seen in all those white politically correct liberals such as those white idiots that wore chains and carried ' I am sorry ' signs on their chests during the ending of slavery events.

http://www.wiltshiretimes.co.uk/mostpopular.var.1434595.mostcommented.marchers_to_say_sorry_for_slavery.php

As a result of this syndrome the ' Suffering Noble Ethnic Image' is the basis of every form of apologistic BS that can be imagined. This is why we live in an Idiocracy not a Democracy, for we are ruled by idiots and their drooling minions.

When ethnic groups shoot fellow members of their ethnic groups in gang shootings to make money from drugs to sustain their Bling Lifestyle - then according to the Liberal Elite its white racism that drives them to do it and a racist court system that puts them in prison. They are never responsible for their own actions, and its always the fault of 'whitey'. This retarded racist nonsense is what goes for mainstream political debate in todays Idiocracy.

When ethnic and religious groups comprised of middle class and university educated zealots blow up tube trains that kill scores of people for their extremist Islamist agenda then its white racism that drives them to do it and their inability to get 'justice ' in the institutionally racist 'system' that drives them to cause violence, never their own extremism.

When ethnic groups form a far greater percentage of the prison population than whites, then it is Institutional Racism that is responsible for them being put in prison not their own criminality. No ethnic is ever responsible for their own actions when they can always blame 'Da Man' for their own problems.

When ethnics are stopped and searched by the Police for suspected involvement in muggings then it is institutional racism that is responsible for them being stopped and then arrested and imprisoned for any crimes they may have been involved in. Even when the evidence is clear, the person who tells the truth must be smeared and libelled.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/01/14/nrape14.xml

http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/565679.stm

http://www.hindu.com/2006/06/11/stories/2006061116381600.htm

http://www.racismeantiblanc.bizland.com/005/01-01.htm



In every BBC, ITV and Channel 4 crime drama the token ethnic minority in the show is always innocent and it is an institutionally racist justice system that has put them in prison for their crimes.

The endless permutations of this 'Suffering Ethnic Syndrome' afflict our society at every turn.

White Juries are even slandered as racists for daring to imprison ethnic minority criminals.

White Liberal Judges, like His Honour Judge Timothy Clayson, who gave derisory community service to scum like these here

http://www.theasiannews.co.uk/news/s/228/228617_trio_carried_out_brutal_attack_on_father_and_son_.html
and the white liberal judge who gave the derisory sentences for the violent racist scum here ;

http://icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/mail/news/tm_headline=cctv-helps-lock-up-racist-attackers&method=full&objectid=19283468&siteid=50002-name_page.html

Then believe the image of the ' Suffering Noble Ethnic' and our community gets NO JUSTICE.

Because they are also victims of this syndrome, they thenpass derisory sentences on ethnic scum and thereby secondary victimise the victims of their crimes and the white community as a whole.

On every front our community is under attack.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institutional_racism

This term Institutional Racism was coined by Stokeley Carmichael a member of the Black Panthers and a radical Marxist. This man was a hero to the self hating, white, middle class university radicals of the pathetic 1968 generation. The 1968 Generation were the nadir of the West, a mewling, whining ,self hating cabal of over educated idiot savants, whose activities have almost destroyed the West but who now work as news reporters, university academics and lawyers making millions from the public purse as part of the Servile State.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokely_Carmichael

Stokeley Carmichael was as vicious a racist as one can find. He hated white people. He coined the phrase 'Black Power' and ' Burn Baby Burn' to describe how whites needed to be murdered and burnt out of black areas of the city. He was the prototype of the ethnic cleansers we have seen in the Balkans.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1516

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_supremacy

Lee Jasper an adviser for the London Mayor on racial issues who also sits on the London Policing Boards has also used the BLACK POWER salute of Carmichael and shouted Black Power ! in a recent documentary by Kenan Malik - review here ;

http://www.kenanmalik.com/critics/tv&radio/disunited_kingdom.html

I wonder if Red Ken would still employ an white employee who worked on the race relations boards of London who did a Nazi Salute at the camera and shouted WHITE POWER ! whilst being interviewed for a TV documentary - of course not, but hey Lee Jasper is black and black fascism is socially acceptable isnt it.

Yet for a decade we have had to endure the systematic undermining of our national institutions in the name of combating Institutional Racism. It was like watching the 'co-ordination' process of the Nazi Regime under Hitler.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleichschaltung

Gleichschaltung (literally "equal switching", meaning "making the same", "bringing into line") is a the term for the process by which the Nazis successively established a system of totalitarian control over the individual, and tight coordination over all aspects of society and commerce. One goal of this policy was to eliminate individualism and resistance to the process by forcing everybody to adhere to a specific doctrine and way of thinking and to control as many aspects of life as possible using an invasive police force with the remit to police all sections of society at the same time.

In the UK our version of the Gestapo was the Commission for Rcial Equality, who had the remit to investigate and control all public authorities as regards Institutional Racism.

In a subversion of all legal norms those institutions werre forced to try and prove a negative - that they werent Institutionally Racist. But seeing as they had already been declared as being Institutionally Racist without any evidence at all, and thereby could not prove the negative that they were not institutionally racist, then they were unable to stop the CRE from ordering them to do whatever it wanted them to do.

The CRE Race Relations Gestapo then controlled the State.

All sections of society were forced to adopt the 'Institutional Racism' ideology and then allow 'diversity advisers' to enter those institutions and change them so that ethnic groups and other favoured minority groups, such as Islamic extremists and
Marxists, were promoted and put in power within those institutions.

All the time the gutless liberals and the gutless reactionary right of the Tory Party all played three monkeys and refused to stand in the way of this revolution without a democratic mandate or remit in our society.

Every time someone dared to stand up to this wave of thuggery against our society, they were called racists until they either capitulated or some gutless jellyfish sacked them from their jobs.

It was like witnessing 1932 again, this time though with the Rainbow Flag of diversity flying over the Council Offices, instead of the Nazi Swastika. Those that dared protest were called racists.

New laws were passed such as the Public Order Act 1986 and the religious hatred laws that allowed the courts to arrest and imprison anyone who dared whisper anything that was considered 'racist' by the self appointed Guardians of Society.

Thought Criminals were hunted down and then exposed for a Public Hate process, where the media brought down hatred on their heads and tried to ruin their lives.

Living through this process was like drowning in a sea of stupidity. Everyone become a marionette with a mission to fulfil, and middle class white liberals donned the jackboots of diversity and began to act like Gauliters in our own communities enforcing diversity.

Racial Dissidents were jailed and paedophiles and child rapists set free.

Last year the police CAUTIONED 230 child rapists, yet imprison people at the merest hint of a sugestion of them being involved in racism - UNLESS THEY ARE ETHNIC MINORITY RACISTS of course, and then they get suspended sentences and community service for their race crimes against whites.

We even had our own Holocaust going on at the same time as the Political Correctness and Instiotutional Racism co-ordination process was underway in British society. This was the Abortion Holocaust that began in 1967 and that has murdered six million of our British citizens in the abortion clinics of the state since then.

They have built a Wall and taught us to call it freedom.

The Wall began the moment we stepped foot outside our front doors and surrounded us our entire lives. No one could escape the Wall, it cast a shadow over us everywhere we went and over everything we did and said.

The Wall was painted in pretty rainbow colours so that children could be shown the Wall and indoctrinated into thinking it was the basis of their liberty and freedoms.

Yet if you dared peer closely at the Wall one could see thousands of holes like pockmarks in the Wall itself.

These were those who opposed the building of the Wall faced public execution and their social destruction.

Each one of these pockmarks in the Wall represented a life ruined.

But the Wall is coming down.

Slowly the shadow cast by the Wall is lifting.

(1) http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article1923647.ece