Saturday, 7 August 2010

Stabbed In The Back By Tories

The Tory plans to destroy the RAF and British Army are treason.

Whilst these men and women have been fighting and dying in Iraq and Afghanistan, that stuck up, tory millionaire ponce David Cameron is stabbing them all in the back.

David Cameron and the Tories are traitors.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/defence/7931465/RAF-to-shrink-to-World-War-One-levels.html

In the most significant changes to Britain’s defences since the post-Suez review of 1957, ministers and officials plan to scrap large parts of the Armed Forces.

The Services will lose up to 16,000 personnel, hundreds of tanks, scores of fighter jets and half a dozen ships, under detailed proposals passed to The Daily Telegraph.

Related Articles

*
Loss of big boys' toys will change forces forever
*
Ministers failing to provide 'Domesday scenario' for cuts
*
Britain's defence is in a state of 'crisis'
*
RAF 'offer to scrap ?3.5 billion Nimrods'
*
RAF helicopter built using half of chinook captured in Falklands
*
Voters resent the wait to replace unethical politicians

But the RAF will bear the brunt of the planned cuts. The Air Force will lose 7,000 airmen – almost one sixth of its total staff – and 295 aircraft. The cuts will leave the Force with fewer than 200 fighter planes for the first time since 1914. In addition, the Navy will lose two submarines, three amphibious ships and more than 100 senior officers, along with 2,000 sailors and marines.

The Army faces a 40 per cent cut to its fleet of 9,700 armoured vehicles and the loss of a 5,000-strong brigade of troops.

The Telegraph has also learnt that the “black hole” in MoD finances, caused by orders which have been made but cannot be paid for, is approaching £72  billion over the next decade – double the amount previously suggested.

While the Strategic Defence and Security Review is yet to be finalised, officials have drawn up a series of likely options to meet cuts of 10 to 20 per cent demanded by the Treasury.

By the end of this month the Defence Strategy Group, comprising ministers and military chiefs, will be presented with a number of recommendations that they will refine and pass to the National Security Council, chaired by the Prime Minister, in September.

In October, after agreement with the Treasury, an announcement will be made in Parliament on precisely what cuts the Forces face as part of the comprehensive spending review of Whitehall budgets.

If implemented, the cuts will mean that Britain will almost certainly depart the world stage as a major military power and become what military chiefs call a “medium-scale player”.

The proposed cuts – which are certain to face a critical reception from the public – are being considered without resolving the question of who pays for the Trident replacement. The MoD hopes that once voters realise the scale of the cuts to the Armed Forces, George Osborne, the Chancellor, may spare some parts of the military. The plans will lead to the RAF losing its status as the fifth biggest air force in the world.

The entire force of 120 GR4 Tornado fighter-bombers looks destined for the scrap heap to save £7.5 billion over the next five years. The Tornado was supposed to be in service until 2025, but with a major overhaul due in the next five years costing £10 million for each aircraft, it is now under threat.

The cut will mean job losses as RAF Lossiemouth and RAF Marham totalling almost 5,000 personnel.

Under the plans, the number of Eurofighter Typhoons is likely to be reduced further from 160 to 107 planes based at a single RAF airfield to save £1  billion. The entire fleet of 36 Hercules transport aircraft, the workhorse in Iraq and Afghanistan, is to be phased out and replaced by an order of 22 new A400M planes.

The £3.6 billion project for nine Nimrod MR4 reconnaissance aircraft is also vulnerable, along with a number of other surveillance planes.

The proposals include a swathe of cuts to the Army’s armoured regiments with the loss of Challenger 2 tanks, AS90 guns and Warrior armoured vehicles.

While the Army is likely to lose a few thousand soldiers in the coming year, reducing its numbers to about 100,000, it is braced to lose an entire brigade of about 5,000 when combat troops withdraw from Afghanistan in 2015. It is understood that 7 Armoured Brigade or 20 Armoured Brigade, both based in Germany, are the most vulnerable.

Infantry battalions will be increased from about 600 troops to 750 as a lesson from Afghanistan has been the loss of combat effectiveness through leave and casualties, according to the plans.

The Royal Marines also face coming under direct Army control from Navy command and the possibility of being grouped into a “super elite” unit alongside two Parachute Regiment battalions.

A senior Whitehall source said: “These are not Tory cuts, these are Labour cuts as a result of their irresponsible overspending. However, a lot of this comes down to how much political appetite there is to do this.”

An MoD spokesman said: “The Defence Secretary has made clear that tough decisions will need to be made but the complex process of a Strategic Defence and Security Review will be concluded in the autumn and speculation at this stage about its outcome is entirely unfounded.”












Add to Technorati Favorites

4 comments:

jonah said...

This may explain the conduct of present and past UK Governments
in regards to Sovereignty, The EU. The disregard of the British constitution, treason, and their contempt for the British people. And so on.

Like all (or probably most) state governments they are mere profit making corporations acting under the rules of international commerce.

http://www.newciv.org/nl/newslog.php/_v308/__show_article/_a000308-000482.htm

Clearfield Doctrine

"Governments descend to the Level of a mere private corporation,
and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen...where
private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and
securities [checks] is concerned. ... For purposes of suit,
such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities
entirely separate from government." -

Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 (1942)
What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private
commercial paper is used by corporate government, then
Government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no
different than a mere private corporation.

Adrian P said...

If we coined out own money Generals we could easily afford all the toys you wanted and needed to defend this country.
Richard Branson has just test flown an engine running on veg oil, I'm sure with a little tinkering your tanks and fighters could run on it too.
This country does not need mid east oil, we can grow our own.

extant said...

Absolutelhy disgusting, as we give 13 billion pounds per year to aid 3rd world monsters to commit Jihad and terror against us and their own people.
But, reamiswmember I said, that you must look at the bright side of any situation-
Well, I am now obviously be looking to purchase ex military vehicles..

One mans pain is another mans gain ;o)

Anonymous said...

Where is the enemy?? Who is the enemy?? We have been a US protectorate since 1941 like most of Europe so why do we need huge armed forces. There is only one occupying force in Europe and that is the US with bases throughout. Probably would be wiser to abolish the pretence of being independent and just give a few billion each year to Washington.