Lets take a look at a few of the options that are kicking around once the constitution has been changed ;
1) QANGO's = Quasi Autonomous Nationalist Groups and Organisations within the BNP.
These would be small voluntary groups formed by individuals within the BNP, such as where individuals want to organise together and undertake a party function such as paper sales, meetings etc.
Drawbacks would be that they could not be official groups of the party, have access to party property, act in the parties name, be sanctioned by the party, organise within the party, be organised by party officials or distribute party propaganda that is only issued to official party activists or authorised party vendors of official party products or propaganda.
They would not be able to use official party logo's, have access to official party resources and facilities and they could not act in the name of the party or promote themselves as agents or functions of the party as they could not be part of the official party structure, and therefore as they would not be under party control we could not allow them to pretend they are part of the party.
As they could not be part of the party then they would not be able to buy BNP products from the party and distribute, issue or use any official BNP products from the party that can only be obtained from official party sources and issued only to appointed party representatives as if we allowed them access to those official party products then they would be classified as official agents of the party.
The idea we would as a party allow QANGO's to organise, exist and operate as autonomous groups within the party and then to promote themselves and act as implied agents of the party, and incur potential legal liabilities for the party, is not going to happen.
The party has spent the last few months removing the copyrighted BNP logo from those individuals and websites who did not have permission to use it, in order to ensure the party image was not tarnished by those who unilaterally pretended they were speaking on behalf of the BNP or put themselves forward as being official agents or spokesmen of the BNP - so no QANGO's will not be allowed to organise within the party and nor will they be allowed to operate either as direct agents or implied agents of the party.
If a QANGO as an implied agent is allowed to form inside the party and is allowed to act, or has purported to act, in a number of situations and the principal ( The party )has knowingly acquiesced when it acts or has acted in the name of the party, then the failure to notify all concerned of the implied agent's lack of authority is an implied ratification to those transactions or actions of the implied agent and an implied grant of authority for future transactions or acts of a similar nature.
Therefore the party would be liable for the actions of implied agents acting in its name, or who can be implied as acting in its name.
If there were too close a relationship between the party and the QANGO, then the legal problem of them being an implied 'agent' of the party would arise if one of the QANGO's or its members went and did something stupid, and thereby left the party legally liable.
Therefore on the grounds of protecting the parties legal interests QANGO's within the party are a no-go.
2)Policy Forums within the party
One idea could be the formation of voluntary Policy Forums within the party eg an Indigenous British Community Forum for those whose interests are defending and promoting the rights and interests of the indigenous British people.
People would not be members of the Policy Forums but would join the forums voluntarily as forum advisers. These groups would have their own elected representatives who would liase with forum advisers to form policies etc that would benefit the interests of those in the particular Policy Forums.
Another group could be a Black British Section for members who wish to represent the interests of the Black Naturalised British Community within the BNP. They could then draft up proposals for the black community in line with the BNP policies and for inclusion in future manifesto's.
This could be a potential idea, and would allow those who wish to join such groups to form their own forum groups and hold private meetings and events for those who wish to join such policy forums.
The aim of the groups would be to have debates, issue proposals to the party and draft up policy ideas to be presented to the party to represent their specific interests.
For those who wish to have such Policy Forums they could do and then they could attend the private meetings of those forums by invitation only - whilst the rest of the membership simply attend normal meetings of the party.
3) De-registering the party and forming QANGO's to stand as independents in elections.
A feasible option for those that think standing in local elections is the ultimate goal of nationalism.
I proposed this as a plan a few years ago if the party was hit with a ban and proscribed. You could theoretically control such independents via the use of 'loaning' independent candidates a copyrighted symbol owned by an officer of the de-registered party which was once the symbol and name of a political party.
Many drawbacks in relation to the long term aims of the political process.
The fact that no national party structure existed to vet and control candidates, no clear chain of command existed in order to control what they did once (or if ) they got elected, no national party structure existed so as to exert control over who could say they were official candidates and who were not - means the reds could stand as independent nationalist candidates in elections and take the nationalist vote.
This sort of scheme is predicated once again upon nationalist short term thinking.
This sort of scheme is predicated upon a 'No Surrender to Common Sense' mindset where those that want nationalism in its traditional impotent and politically useless form are unable to evolve and adapt.
Rather than realising that the virtually entire strategy and tactics of nationalism have been flawed for the past fifty years, as demonstrated by the fact that until 2000 only the BNP had won 1 council seat, then this merely is a sop to those who still persist in perpetuating the failed methodology of the past.
Nationalism must evolve, not splinter into powerless little cabals of pissed off nationalists standing, and being ignored, in elections.
This strategy would be a total waste of time simply as the mainstream parties would be able to outspend, out leaflet, out propagandise and swamp any nationalist that stood.
As no national structure would exist then the issue of how these independents would be funded would arise.
Similarly all the Electoral Commission would need to do is issue a clarification of what an 'Independent' candidate is and then ban any individuals who were representatives of political parties that had de-registered.
Any nationalist that tried to stand as an independent would be also studied and their history of political membership thrown back at them eg Joe Bloggs is ex-NF and in leaflets put out by Searchlight this would be higlighted in order to undercut their vote.
If they used the NF symbol on their leaflets, then they would still be NF and get nowhere.
Complete waste of time. Another diversionary plan for 'fantasy nationalism'.
4) Join the NF
This an option for all those that like to play Fantasy Politics as opposed to real politics.
You could join the NF and then personally feel like a 'good nationalist' whilst doing nothing at all for nationalism.
If the NF somehow started to win seats then the Equality Commission would simply come for them as well.
In relation to the NF membership criteria ;
" The National Front is a radical racial nationalist movement made up of a confederation of semi-autonomous branches. The primary object of the National Front is to ensure the survival and advancement of the White Race and the British Nation.
Compliance with the terms of this Constitution shall be a necessary condition of membership of the National Front. "
Two problems ;
1) The Equality Commission uses the internal propaganda of the party under investigation as evidence of its 'white only' racist membership policy, so I wonder if the NF have ever said they are a 'white race' only organisation in their internal propaganda at all ?
Hmmm a hard one that.
2) The Equality Commission will send them a formal legal notice giving the NF twenty one days to state whether they racially discriminate in relation to their membership policy and secondly do they have a whites only membership policy which is what they did to the BNP - and if they refuse to answer then they will take them to court to get a 'clarification ' on the position of the NF as regarding those two issues.
Now I wonder if the NF would be willing to say ;
1) We do not racially discriminate in relation to new members and we allow non-whites to join the NF
2) Our party is not a whites only party and our definition of the 'white race' is not based on race or skin colour.
Hmmmm, hard one that.
If they did not respond, did not reply or did not clarify their membership criteria -then they will be banned.
Simple as that.
5) QANGO's outside the party.
A superb idea.
Quasi Autonomous Nationalist Groups which self organise to set up gigs, festivals, cultural events etc are an essential facet of the future of nationalism.
As long as the MEMBERS of that group comprise less than 25 people then those groups are 100 % lawful.
Therefore all you need is five people as the founders and committee of the group and then people do not join as such, they issue their addresses and e mail details and become supporters and thereby get notified when any events are organised.
I would suggest that for those hard core nationalists that do not want to evolve with the party set these up and run them for themselves.
The nationalist political parties are the tips of the spear, the QANGO's are the organisations that generate the masses that propel the spear forward.
In order for nationalist political parties to increase in size and power then the masses must be NATIONALISED.
This means we must have as many community outreach programmes as possible whose aim and intent is to draw in the disenfranchised white community into those organisations - and then once inside them educate them into becoming nationalists.
The role of a political party is to stand in elections - and therefore as the entire legal system is being used to undermine our ability to operate in communities, QANGO's would allow nationalists to operate below the political radar and have direct contact with the white community and thereby educate, indoctrinate and organise them into becoming nationalist voters and supporters.
For example - a QANGO was set up to act as a creche in a white working class area for young mums and families with little or no government or community support. This would allow nationalists to organise a community network of people who then can be introduced to nationalism.
QANGO's could set up family days, barbecues, football events etc etc and thereby create a nexus of organisations to knit the white working class back together and then allow them to be nationalised.
The ONLY community in this country with no community centres, no ethnic lobby groups, no ethnic legal representatives, no ethnic charities, no government or council funded groups to help them in any way are whites.
This means the whites HAVE NO COMMUNITY CONSCIOUSNESS.
Not until the white community develops a consciousness of itself as a community, will it vote as a community for those political parties that seek to represent the white community in the political process.
For decades the failure of nationalism to understand this simple fact - THAT UNLESS THE WHITE COMMUNITY THINKS AND ACTS AS A COMMUNITY IT WILL NOT VOTE FOR POLITICAL PARTIES THAT SEEK TO REPRESENT THE WHITE COMMUNITY - has meant that nationalism has been drawing its votes from shallow pools of voters who already think or see themselves as nationalists.
In order for the white community to think as a community, then the fragmented and splintered atomised white community must be knitted back together by QANGO's and then it will start to think and act as a community.
Politics alone cannot save us unless the white community becomes a community again.
This process of atomising the white community has been a deliberate feature of the Liberal social engineering project of the last fifty years, and it began with the demolishing of the old white working class communities that were designated as 'slums' and then the breaking up of extended families.
When the old working class white communities were destroyed and replaced by high rise flats, this resulted in the destruction of the extended family and kin networks that were the basis of the old white working class communities.
Mum and dad used to live next door to nana and grandad and our cousins lived down the road - and each helped the other out all the time, so that a living community existed.
The destruction of the old white working class communities led to the total breakdown of the extended white family networks that ensured our communities and families flourished. Tearing them apart destryoed the community and families in one go.
This was a crime against humanity as we have seen the crime, drug abuse, poverty, social alienation that the liberal social engineering plan created in our communities - and today they call us racists for trying to reform white communities and recreate extended family networks to save our people.
Once the white community was torn apart the immigrants were shipped in and allowed to drive a further wedge between the white community and extended families.
A recent book about the East End of London which explored the destruction of the white working class communities, and the resulting social and individual problems caused by the dismantling of extended family networks who all used to live alongside each other giving each other mutual support, revealed just how much damage the processes of White Community Destruction and Multi-Culturalism did to our people.
The white community is the ONLY community that no longer thinks or votes as a community.
Therefore if we are to get into power we must first get the white community to re-organise as a community, then think of themselves as a community and then vote as a community.
This is where QANGO's are essential.
For those nationalists that are unable to accept the BNP constitutional changes required to keep the BNP as a functional party and to allow it to participate in the democratic political process, then rather than waste their time joining the NF - form a QANGO in your own area and start to nationalise your own community.
I suspect though that many of the Keyboard warriors, arm chair nationalists and gobshites that are shouting the loudest' No Surrender' are those least likely to do anything to save our people.
It may salve the conscience to put thirty quid in an envelope and send it off to the NF once a year and then do bugger all else, but that does not make you a nationalist.
A nationalist is an activist, not a keyboard warrior or a 'card carrying do nothing'.
6) Freezing the membership - another rubbish suggestion.
What is the point of giving the courts the legal guarantees we need to continue to operate when we effectivly 'freeze' the party.
The changes in the constitution will allow many new people to join the party and encourage others to do so - so we will be forced to change the constitution, put up with all the alarmist nonsense peddled by the 'No Surrender' mob in the party and then wilfully block ourselves from any benefits from the change - which are new members and new money coming in.
As for the idea peddled by some that the Equality Bill scraps the entire body of race relations laws, case laws and precedents - it doesnt.
The Equality Bill is a consolidating act, whereby it will draw all the old legislation from disparate sources into one consolidated body of law ;
Reducing nine major pieces of legislation, and around 100 statutory instruments into a single Act, making the law more accessible and easier to understand, so that everyone can be clear on their rights and responsibilities.
The Equality Act does not overule the race relations acts - it puts them all under one act.
At the same time the Equality Act is TIGHTENING up the race relations acts and making the 7 grounds of unlawful discrimination include such things as discrmination against transexuals.
The new act expressly states that all membership associations are bound by the act - thereby taking away the need for a court case using the race relations act and case law in order to create grounds for a case.
All a stay on proceedings will do is ensure we are faced with a more EXTREME and more tightend up act in the future - and that we have to pay more costs fighting it again through the courts with even less chance of winning the case.
The fact is that even if we wanted to adjourn the case - we cant.
We have six weeks to issue the clarifications the court demands or we get injuncted and the party de-registered.
Therefore fanciful plans to 'avoid this by crawling up into our own backsides and going la la la la with our fingers in our ears and eyes closed until it all goes away' is simply not an option.
Therefore ideas such as freezing membership and changing the constitution are meaningless - it is better to bite the bullet, firewall as best as possible the new constitution with procedural amendments re the operation of the party and begin to exploit the fact that we can no longer be defined as a 'racist' party by attacking the bans in the police, prison service, trade unions etc etc.
7) The idea that because black members may be present at meetings some members may cause trouble is easily solved.
Just as at present if a BNP member attacked or verbally abused another BNP member for any reason in a public place or at a BNP meeting then they would be ;
A) Kicked out of the party
B) Banned from the party
C) Reported to the Police
If any drunk thugs thought they could verbally abuse or attack fellow BNP members for any reason, let alone their race, then they would be expelled. That rule applies to all members at all times.
And finally thanks to Lancaster Unity for confirming that my plans for the constitution are bang on target.
As an old Lancaster bomber pilot who I used to know used to say ;
'Only when you are getting flack from all sides do you know you are right on target'.
Being attacked by the Nazis on Stormfront and the Reds on Lancaster unity is all the validation I ever need.
Thanks to the dykes and queers on LU and the jackboot and lederhosen fetishists on SF.
For some strange reason they love that picture of me they keep putting up on their site, I dread to think why - the grubby little perverts.