What the Labour government did with immigration is classified as Treason under the existing and still legally enforcable Treason Act 1848 ;
he Treason Felony Act 1848 (11 & 12 Vict. c. 12) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. The Act is still in force. It is a law which protects the Queen and the Crown.
It is treason felony to "compass, imagine, invent, devise, or intend":
* to deprive the Queen of her crown,
* to levy war against the Queen, or
* to "move or stir" any foreigner to invade the United Kingdom or any other country belonging to the Queen.
The wording of the relevant section of the Act is:
“ 3. Offences herein mentioned declared to be felonies
If any person whatsoever shall, within the United Kingdom or without, compass, imagine, invent, devise, or intend to deprive or depose our Most Gracious Lady the Queen, from the style, honour, or royal name of the imperial crown of the United Kingdom, or of any other of her Majesty’s dominions and countries, or to levy war against her Majesty, within any part of the United Kingdom, in order by force or constraint to compel her to change her measures or counsels, or in order to put any force or constraint upon or in order to intimidate or overawe both Houses or either House of Parliament, or to move or stir any foreigner or stranger with force to invade the United Kingdom or any other of her Majesty’s dominions or countries under the obeisance of her Majesty, and such compassings, imaginations, inventions, devices, or intentions, or any of them, shall express, utter, or declare, by publishing any printing or writing ... or by any overt act or deed, every person so offending shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable ... to be transported beyond the seas for the term or his or her natural life.
Now then we see what is meant by the text here ;
" or to move or stir any foreigner or stranger with force to invade the United Kingdom or any other of her Majesty’s dominions or countries under the obeisance of her Majesty, and such compassings, imaginations, inventions, devices, or intentions, or any of them, shall express, utter, or declare, by publishing any printing or writing ... or by any overt act or deed, every person so offending shall be guilty of felony "
Now the issue is of course 'with force ... to invade'.
With force does not state 'force with arms'.
So therefore it applies to circumstances without arms as well as with arms.
In the field of law, the word force has two main meanings: unlawful violence and lawful compulsion. "Forced entry" is an expression falling under the category of unlawful violence; "in force" or "forced sale" would be examples of expressions in the category of lawful compulsion.
Force also means - 1. (countable) Anything that is able to make a big change in a person or thing.
So therefore 'force' implies lawful compulsion and that which is liable to make big changes in a thing eg a country.
The force applies not just to a power but also 'a force' eg a group of people who are able to make changes.
Therefore a force applies to any population of foreigners allowed to enter a country and change the nature of that country and society.
A force also applies to a group that aims to attack, control, or constrain eg Islamic Terrorists.
Therefore the fact that Islamic Terrorists are in our country is proof that a 'force' of people has been allowed to enter our country.
This compulsion in relation to power applies not to the immigrants but also the British people.
An example of lawful compulsion is when a man is compelled by lawful authority to do that which be ought to do, that compulsion does not affect the validity of the act; as for example, when a court of competent jurisdiction compels a party to execute a deed, under the pain of attachment for contempt, the grantor cannot object to it on the ground of compulsion.
In this case the lawful compulsion in relation to 'force' also relates to the Britain and the British forcing Britain and the British people to have to accept the immigrants and colonists into the country because the government ;
1) Passed legislation to encourage and assist immigrants into the country.
2) Had secret motives for allowing in the immigrants that were kept from the public
3) That the governmenr did not enforce international binding agreements such as the Schengen agreement when it allowed asylum seekers to enter Britain and settle
4) That successive governments have not allowed the British people to vote on immigration as an issue
To invade also has a definition not linked to military conflict ;
–verb (used with object)
1. to enter forcefully as an enemy; go into with hostile intent: Germany invaded Poland in 1939.
2. to enter like an enemy: Locusts invaded the fields.
3. to enter as if to take possession: to invade a neighbor's home.
4. to enter and affect injuriously or destructively, as disease: viruses that invade the bloodstream.
5. to intrude upon: to invade the privacy of a family.
6. to encroach or infringe upon: to invade the rights of citizens.
7. to permeate: The smell of baking invades the house.
8. to penetrate; spread into or over: The population boom has caused city dwellers to invade the suburbs.
Therefore the lawful compulsion of the government imposed upon the British people, via the passing of legislation that allowed foreigners and strangers to enter and settle in the UK and forced the British people to accept them in the UK, and the intrusions of those foreigners whose populations have grown to such an extent they have displaced indigenous British people from areas of Britain and whose presence has encroached or infringed upon the rights of British citizens eg because of terrorism, crime and the governments removal and limitation of our constitutionally protected rights of free speech to terrorise the indigenous British people into silence - means the political elite can be charged with Treason under the act.
The fact that a force of Islamist terrorists have been allowed to enter and invade our nation by successive governments because of the so called 'Covenant of Security' with Islamists ;
This means that the politicians involved in this, and the media that covered it up and who assisted the parties to get into power during this process, are all liable to be charged with treason.
They should remember that.
Huge increases in immigration over the past decade were a deliberate attempt to engineer a more multicultural Britain, a former Government adviser said yesterday.
Andrew Neather, a speechwriter who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, said Labour's relaxation of controls was a plan to 'open up the UK to mass migration'.
As well as bringing in hundreds of thousands to plug labour market gaps, there was also a 'driving political purpose' behind immigration policy, he claimed.
Shoppers on Oxford Street
Official policy: Huge increases in immigration over the past decade were 'a deliberate attempt to engineer a more multicultural Britain'
Ministers hoped to change the country radically and 'rub the Right's nose in diversity'. But Mr Neather said senior Labour figures were reluctant to discuss the policy, fearing it would alienate its 'core working-class vote'.
On Question Time, Mr Straw was repeatedly quizzed about whether Labour's immigration policies had left the door open for the BNP.
Writing in the Evening Standard, Mr Neather revealed the 'major shift' in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office.
The published version promoted the labour-market case for immigration but Mr Neather said unpublished versions contained additional reasons.
'Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.
'I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended - even if this wasn't its main purpose - to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.' The 'deliberate policy', from late 2000 until 'at least February last year', when the new points-based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.
Mr Neather defended the policy, saying mass immigration has 'enriched' Britain and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place.
Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank, said: 'Now at least the truth is out, and it's dynamite. Many have long suspected that mass immigration under Labour was not just a cock-up but a conspiracy. They were right.
'This Government has admitted three million immigrants for cynical political reasons concealed by dodgy economic camouflage.'