Monday, 26 October 2009

Why Radovan Karadzic But Not Blair






The international tribunal indictment against Radovan Karadzic carries a long list of charges. Below are some of the key events that the charge sheet covers:
The detention camps

Omarska was the first internment camp accessed by British journalists. The accounts of starvation and human rights abuses led to an international outcry. Omarska was one of dozens of camps where Muslim men were being held. They were allegedly sent there in pursuance of the Bosnian-Serb policy of ethnic cleansing of the Prijedor region.

- But Blair is not prosecuted for Abu Ghraib.



Thousands of Muslims were forced to flee hunger, violence and disease in the enclaves of Cerska, Kamenica, and Srebrenica in eastern Bosnia. They headed for the Muslim-held town of Tuzla. The Serbs described it as "ethnic shifting".
Muslims flee fresh wave of 'ethnic cleansing'

- Millions of Iraqis have fled Iraq due to the invasion and occupation.




Muslims fled Zepa in the east for the relative safety of Sarajevo. They said they were sent on their way by General Ratko Mladic, who told them: "No Allah, no UN, no Nato can save you. Only me."


- George Bush and Blair are both Fundamentalist Christians who talked about a 'Crusade' in Iraq.



Recognition for Bosnia-Herzegovina from Washington and the EU failed to prevent violence breaking out on the first day of independence as Serbs declared their own republic loyal to Yugoslavia and clashed with Muslims and Croats.

One of the worst shellings of civilian gatherings during the siege of Sarajevo was an attack on a football tournament in the western suburb of Dobrinja, on the Muslim holy day of Bajram. The initial report failed to capture the true extent of the attack. The UN indictment put the death toll at 146.

- Over a million killed in Iraq





Serbian forces overran the UN safe haven of Srebrenica where tens of thousands of Muslims were sheltering. Dutch peacekeepers offered no resistance. Only later would the fate of thousands of Muslim men become clear.

Information dripped out about the Srebrenica massacre. Eventually the death toll was put at 8,000.

- over a million killed in Iraq during the war and the chaos that erupted after the invasion due to the dismantling of the Iraqi army, police and state. 1 in 10 of the Iraqi population were immediately thrown into poverty and then formed militias.




Excerpts from the the 1995 UN indictment against Karadzic and Mladic

• They are criminally responsible for the unlawful confinement, murder, rape, sexual assault, torture, beating, robbery and inhumane treatment of civilians; the targeting of political leaders, intellectuals and professionals; the unlawful deportation and transfer of civilians; the unlawful shelling of civilians; the unlawful appropriation and plunder of real and personal property; the destruction of homes and businesses and the destruction of places of worship.


- The invasion of Iraq caused the same including the looting of the Baghdad museum.


• Thousands of Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croat civilians, including women, children and elderly persons, were detained ... for protracted periods of time. They were not afforded judicial process and their internment was not justified by military necessity. They were detained, in large measure, because of their national, religious and political identity. The conditions in the detention facilities were inhumane and brutal.


- Abu Ghraib



• In many instances, women and girls who were detained were raped at the camps or taken from the detention centres and raped, or otherwise sexually abused at other locations. Daily food rations provided to detainees were inadequate and often amounted to starvation rations. Medical care for the detainees was insufficient or nonexistent and the general hygiene conditions were grossly inadequate.


- Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay and extraordinary rendition to countries where torture was authorised and undertaken.

• Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic, individually and in concert with others, planned, instigated, ordered or otherwise aided and abetted in the planning, preparation or execution of unlawful attacks against the civilian population and individual civilians with weapons such as mortars, rockets and artillery.


- Blair and his generals plotted an illegal war



• Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic, individually and in concert with others planned, instigated, ordered or otherwise aided and abetted in the planning, preparation or execution of the destruction of sacred sites, or knew or had reason to know that subordinates were about to damage or destroy these sites, or had done so and failed to take necessary and reasonable measures to prevent them from doing so or to punish the perpetrators thereof.


- The destruction of Babylon, the Iraqi museum and sites of ancient history.



• Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic, individually and in concert with others planned, instigated, ordered or otherwise aided and abetted in the planning, preparation or execution of the taking of civilians, that is UN peacekeepers, as hostages and, additionally, using them as 'human shields'.



- Blair allowed British troops to go to war under equipped, with sub standard kit and equipment in vehicles not suitable for their role in the theatre of combat.



Therefore why is Karadzic being prosecuted but Blair isnt ?




Add to Technorati Favorites

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Hague court is also another Fabian set up meaning Fabians will never face trial there!
There was NO genocide whatsoever just as Iraq was about oil as is Afghanistan so was the breaking up of Nationalist Yugoslavia the clue is there Nationalist!
Camp Bondsteel was required alongside the Caspian sea and come what may that was the Wests goal.

http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/scanad.htm

Germany played a large part in the destruction of Yugoslavia the old debt they'd wanted settled.

ITV was complicit in the lies fed to the British public during the 1990s war, a war that woke me up to the scum we have in Westminster.


Unlike Marx’s open and violent revolutionary agenda, the Fabian’s agenda was to quietly infiltrate and re-direct established governments. The Fabians were instrumental in creating the Peace Movement, which is the perfect antithesis to violent expansionism. Fabians also helped establish the International Court at the Hague. The Fabians designed the first League of Nations (the precursor to the United Nations). Fabian influence on the creation of the U.N. is no secret, either.

http://nord.twu.net/acl/revisionism.html

alanorei said...

Blair always did what his wife's pope told him too.

He's now part of that papal zoo.

And is therefore fireproof.

lpcyusa said...

Irrefutable Proof ICTY Is Corrupt Court/Irrefutable Proof the Hague Court Cannot Legitimately Prosecute Karadzic Case

This legal technicality indicates the Hague must dismiss charges against Dr karadzic and others awaiting trials in the Hague jail; like it or not.

Unfortunately for the Signatures Of the Rome Statute United Nations member states instituting the ICC & ICTY housed at the Hague, insofar as the, Radovan Karadzic, as with the other Hague cases awaiting trial there, I personally witnessed these United Nations member states openly speaking about trading judicial appointments and verdicts for financial funding when I attended the 2001 ICC Preparatory Meetings at the UN in Manhattan making the iCTY and ICC morally incapable trying Radovan Karazdic and others.

I witnessed with my own eyes and ears when attending the 2001 Preparatory Meetings to establish an newly emergent International Criminal Court, the exact caliber of criminal corruption running so very deeply at the Hague, that it was a perfectly viable topic of legitimate conversation in those meetings I attended to debate trading verdicts AND judicial appointments, for monetary funding.

Jilly wrote:*The rep from Spain became distraught and when her country’s proposal was not taken to well by the chair of the meeting , then Spain argued in a particularly loud and noticably strongly vocal manner, “Spain (my country) strongly believes if we contribute most financial support to the Hague’s highest court, that ought to give us and other countries feeding it financially MORE direct power over its decisions.”

((((((((((((((((((((((((( ((((((((((((((((((((((((( Instead of censoring the country representative from Spain for even bringing up this unjust, illegal and unfair judicial idea of bribery for international judicial verdicts and judicial appointments, all country representatives
present in the meeting that day all treated the Spain proposition as a ”totally legitimate topic” discussed and debated it between each other for some time. I was quite shocked! The idea was "let's discuss it." "It's a great topic to discuss."

Some countries agreed with Spain’s propositions while others did not. The point here is, bribery for judicial verdicts and judicial appointments was treated as a totally legitimate topic instead of an illegitimate toic which it is in the meeting that I attended in 2001 that day to establish the ground work for a newly emergent
international criminal court.))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

In particular., since "Spain" was so overtly unafraid in bringing up this topic of trading financial funding the ICC for influence over its future judicial appointments and verdicts in front of every other UN member state present that day at the UN, "Spain" must have already known by previous experience the topic of bribery was "socially acceptable" for conversation that day. They must have previously spoke about bribing the ICTY and ICC before in meetings; this is my take an international sociological honor student.

SPAIN's diplomatic gesture of international justice insofar as, Serbia, in all of this is, disgusting morally!

SPAIN HAS TAUGHT THE WORLD THE TRUE DEFINITION OF AN "INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT."

lpcyusa said...

Irrefutable Proof ICTY Is Corrupt Court/Irrefutable Proof the Hague Court Cannot Legitimately Prosecute Karadzic Case

This legal technicality indicates the Hague must dismiss charges against Dr karadzic and others awaiting trials in the Hague jail; like it or not.

Unfortunately for the Signatures Of the Rome Statute United Nations member states instituting the ICC & ICTY housed at the Hague, insofar as the, Radovan Karadzic, as with the other Hague cases awaiting trial there, I personally witnessed these United Nations member states openly speaking about trading judicial appointments and verdicts for financial funding when I attended the 2001 ICC Preparatory Meetings at the UN in Manhattan making the iCTY and ICC morally incapable trying Radovan Karazdic and others.

I witnessed with my own eyes and ears when attending the 2001 Preparatory Meetings to establish an newly emergent International Criminal Court, the exact caliber of criminal corruption running so very deeply at the Hague, that it was a perfectly viable topic of legitimate conversation in those meetings I attended to debate trading verdicts AND judicial appointments, for monetary funding.

Jilly wrote:*The rep from Spain became distraught and when her country’s proposal was not taken to well by the chair of the meeting , then Spain argued in a particularly loud and noticably strongly vocal manner, “Spain (my country) strongly believes if we contribute most financial support to the Hague’s highest court, that ought to give us and other countries feeding it financially MORE direct power over its decisions.”

((((((((((((((((((((((((( ((((((((((((((((((((((((( Instead of censoring the country representative from Spain for even bringing up this unjust, illegal and unfair judicial idea of bribery for international judicial verdicts and judicial appointments, all country representatives
present in the meeting that day all treated the Spain proposition as a ”totally legitimate topic” discussed and debated it between each other for some time. I was quite shocked! The idea was "let's discuss it." "It's a great topic to discuss."

Some countries agreed with Spain’s propositions while others did not. The point here is, bribery for judicial verdicts and judicial appointments was treated as a totally legitimate topic instead of an illegitimate toic which it is in the meeting that I attended in 2001 that day to establish the ground work for a newly emergent
international criminal court.))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

In particular., since "Spain" was so overtly unafraid in bringing up this topic of trading financial funding the ICC for influence over its future judicial appointments and verdicts in front of every other UN member state present that day at the UN, "Spain" must have already known by previous experience the topic of bribery was "socially acceptable" for conversation that day. They must have previously spoke about bribing the ICTY and ICC before in meetings; this is my take an international sociological honor student.

SPAIN's diplomatic gesture of international justice insofar as, Serbia, in all of this is, disgusting morally!

SPAIN HAS TAUGHT THE WORLD THE TRUE DEFINITION OF AN "INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT."