Saturday, 2 July 2011

Oil and the Dollar

http://www.alt-market.com/articles/158-iea-oil-dump-a-disaster-in-the-making



It’s amazing. In the wake of the 2008 derivatives and housing bubble collapse, created by the U.S. Treasury and the private Federal Reserve with engineered low interest rates and easy money designed to artificially pump up the economy after the effects of the dot-com bust, the faltering markets of 2000-2001, and the rapidly depreciating dollar, we have now seen these same entities pour Trillions, yes, TRILLIONS in fiat injections into every conceivable corner of the markets. They have spent incredible sums on toxic equities (worthless equities, and don’t let anyone tell you different) to “ease” the debt spiral, they have propped up almost every large international bank, they have propped up the Federal Government and the Dollar itself with sizable purchases of our own Treasury debt, and, they have even thrown money into the pockets of foreign institutions and corporate beggars. Keep in mind, that all the debt that these actions generate is eventually placed squarely in the lap of one group of people; the American Taxpayer!

They have manipulated unemployment figures. They have consistently released completely fraudulent CPI (inflation) figures based on calculations which neglect numerous factors that used to be counted only two decades ago. They have used coordinated naked short selling in precious metals markets to hold back the natural spikes in gold and silver values. They have blamed every negative development in the economy (that they could not hide) on extraneous circumstances and outside culprits rather than themselves. They have done all this, to conjure the illusion of recovery for an increasingly agitated general public.

So much tap dancing and snake oil selling, and all it took, was the pain of $4 a gallon gas to wipe everything away…

That’s right, when the cost of driving to work, driving to shop, or driving for vacation doubles, the naïve notion that everything is perfectly normal goes right out the window. Americans complain a lot, but they rarely accept a bad situation as inexorable and take measures to fix it themselves. There is always the “chance” that things will get better tomorrow, or so we tell ourselves. We just ride the wave, and expect the pack of sharks at our back will never quite catch up to our boogie-board of blind optimism. However, when something takes a Great White sized bite out our very wallets, we take notice, and search the horizon for a bigger boat.

I have commented in the past that after only a few months of high gas prices, the wind would easily be knocked right out of our puffed up bailout driven recovery, and so far, that is exactly what is happening. Retail sales are fumbling, vacation destinations are crippled, the housing market continues to dive, in part due to the relentlessly high price of energy. When people travel less, they spend less, they buy less, and they relocate less.

In response, the IEA (International Energy Agency), an organization of 28 countries, has made a very sudden and startling announcement; each member nation will begin dumping their strategic crude oil reserves onto the global marketplace to flood the supply side of the equation, and, in theory, drive down overall oil prices. The IEA will release over 60 million barrels over at least 30 days into the markets, half of which will come directly out of the strategic reserves of the U.S. This is only the third time in the 37 year history of the IEA that this kind of action has been taken. Surely, governments around the world have finally realized that inflation in energy is going to completely derail what’s left of our financial structure, and they are working to prevent this, right…?

Some economists and many in the public will cheer this decision as a fast and decisive solution to the growing oil crises. These people would be foolish. But, perhaps we should look at the debate points from their side of the field, or even the U.S. government and the IEA’s side of the field. Below, we will look at the arguments made in support of the IEA oil dump so far, and why they are utter nonsense…

Lie #1: Oil Prices Are High Because The War In Libya Has Diminished Supply

Better throw on some boots and grab a shovel! Digging through this crap might take all day…

I’ll tell you a little secret, something mainstream economic analysts would rather you didn’t hear: there is NO lack of supply in crude markets. Sorry, the facts are clear. I realize that there are also proponents of ‘peak oil’ out there that fervently want to believe that there is a current and substantial supply side crisis in crude. Whether they are correct or not about the eventuality of peak oil remains to be seen, however, we are certainly not seeing any semblance of an oil shortage today, despite events in Libya.

Libya’s crude production before the war accounted for only 2% of the world’s entire oil output. Oil prices were climbing back towards the high levels seen in 2008 long before the “Arab Spring” broke out in the region. In February, the IEA itself reported that the world oil supply rose to an all time high of 89 million barrels per day. After the Libyan conflict erupted, this production fell by a marginal 700,000 barrels per day:

http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/04/iea-reports-that-world-oil-supply-rose.html

The establishment’s assertion that Libya is somehow the direct cause of energy inflation is a distraction. Libya has little or nothing to do with anything.

Lie #2: The IEA Oil Dump Will Create A Supply Glut And Drive Down Prices

The position that a “lack of supply” is the culprit behind rising gas prices is an outright falsehood. In fact, markets are already awash in oil, and our government is fully aware of this. The U.S. Energy Department has shown a global trend of falling demand for gasoline, and, the IEA has even admitted that this trend is likely to continue through 2011:

http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Energy-Resources/2011/05/17/IEA-sees-US-gasoline-demand-falling/UPI-99911305637281/

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-23/-head-scratcher-petroleum-release-to-inflate-u-s-crude-glut.html

Anyone who follows the Baltic Dry Index also knows that freight shipping has collapsed back down to levels near those that appeared right before the 2008 debt bubble burst. This means around the world there is less demand for nearly ALL goods, and many commodities necessary for manufacturing, not just oil. Lower demand means greater available supply. Therefore, supply is in no way the issue when it comes to high oil prices. Again, the supply argument is a distraction away from the truth. Yet, this has been Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s primary rationale for supporting the IEA dump:

"We saw a very substantial sustained supply disruption. These reserves exist in part to offset those kind of disruptions," Geithner told CNBC television.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/24/us-usa-economy-geithner-oil-idUSTRE75N5ZK20110624

So, to reiterate, there is ALREADY a glut in oil markets, and there has been since at least 2008. If there was actually a supply side crisis, trust me, you would know it. If you want to study a true crude supply crisis, then you only need glance back at the energy crisis of 1979 when Jimmy Carter ordered a cessation of Iranian oil imports and the Iran/Iraq war began. When you have to wait in long lines at the gas station just for a few gallons of unleaded, then you might be in the middle of a supply crisis.

After we accept the fact that supply is high and demand is low, we are then faced with an important question; why in the world would the IEA report high supply and low demand, and then expect to have any significant effect on oil markets by dumping our strategic reserves?!

Lie #3: The IEA Oil Dump Was Designed To Hit “Speculators”, Who Are The “Real” Cause Of Energy Inflation

Back in 2009 after the first major gasoline spike subsided, I spoke often about the mainstream financial media’s strange obsession with “speculators”, and the consistent use of talking points obviously designed to condition the American public into associating all oil price jumps with scheming investors in the shadows out to corner the market. My theory back then was that once oil began to skyrocket again due to the crumbling value of the dollar, establishment pundits and government officials would come back once again to point a finger at the speculator boogie man, and draw attention away from our inflating currency. Sure enough…

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/22/obama-form-task-force-tackle-rising-gas-prices/

As we have seen, supply is not an issue, and so speculation should not be either. However, if speculators have actually been hoarding stocks and supplies in order to artificially drive up the price of crude, then the IEA announcement should have sent them scrambling to phone their brokers to sell-sell-sell! The shock to oil markets should have been extraordinary. But what happened? Not much to write home about…

The Brent crude index saw a relatively moderate price drop from around $113-$115 a barrel down to $105 a barrel, and currently, the price is showing potential to climb back up!

Initiating the release of the strategic oil reserves of nations across the globe caused an overall price drop of a few bucks? I guess speculators weren’t having much of an effect on the market after all.

So, if speculators aren’t the cause, and neither is limited supply or high demand, then what IS the phantom driver of inflation in energy? There is only one other possible answer; devaluing currencies. The IEA can pour all the oil they want into the markets and it won’t change a damn thing, because higher supply does nothing to strengthen the foundation of the dollar, which is being swiftly eroded by the Federal Reserve. Have they accomplished a minor halt to rising prices and visible inflation? Yes. Will prices bounce back even higher in the near future as the Fed continue to inject fiat into the economy? Absolutely.
The Consequences Of Reserve Depletion

The IEA announcement comes directly after the last OPEC meeting ended in a bitter split between member countries over whether to raise crude production levels. The decision by every country except Saudi Arabia to keep production steady was the right one, of course. However, elements of the U.S. and the EU were downright unhappy with OPEC’s unwillingness to help hide the weakness of their respective currencies. An OPEC decision to increase production would have at least influenced market psychology, and allowed prices to soften for a short time. So, without OPEC support, the central banker controlled apparatus turned to the IEA to open the floodgates of petroleum. OPEC nations, as one might imagine, are not happy…

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/23/us-opec-iea-idUSTRE75M6J520110623

There are several threats associated with this development, and there is a distinct possibility that these have been deliberately provoked, if one considers that a weakened America ripe for centralization is the true goal.

First, OPEC countries could easily retaliate against the IEA by dropping their own production levels. Not only will the IEA action be meaningless (as we have shown above), it could also directly trigger a REAL supply crisis if OPEC decides to dam up the river. The U.S. is very unpopular in the Middle East, Africa, and Venezuela already. Now, the IEA has just given these regions a perfect excuse to dish out some economic vengeance.

Second, traditionally, if there is a real supply side crisis caused by OPEC, our most important stop-gap would be to tap into our strategic reserves. Unfortunately, we have just put those reserves on the market without batting an eye. So, in essence, we paid a very high price for a bullet that we will one day shoot ourselves in the foot with. That is to say, we have dumped our strategic reserves and set in motion a possible disaster which those reserves were supposed to save us from! Its mind boggling!

Third, there is very little stopping OPEC at this point from decoupling from the U.S. dollar completely, especially if crude prices continue to rise despite the IEA dump. The fact of currency inflation and dollar implosion will be so exposed that no one, not even “Tiny Tim” Geithner, will be able to deny it. Once the illusions of “limited supply” and “speculation” are cast aside, the global focus will end up squarely on the dollar, and the IEA dump will have sped up the process dramatically.

I don’t know if anyone else has noticed, but this country has been thoroughly gutted over the past few decades. Our industrial base has been dismantled and shipped overseas to the benefit of foreign nations and corporate feudalists. Our grain reserves, once ample, have been depleted to an all time low. Our currency has been systematically debased. And now, our oil reserves, without rational cause, are being sold off only to feed the catastrophe our government is supposedly out to stop. Are the American people being prepped like a glazed ham for the fires of the globalist oven? Is this really all due to coincidence and stupidity as skeptics claim, or is there something else at work here? I find it hard to believe that the IEA and our government are not aware that their proposed strategies conflict with their own source data, or that they are completely oblivious to the destruction they are about to reap upon our economy. The latest IEA decision is just one more piece of evidence of an agenda of deliberate financial destabilization trending towards a disaster that serves the interests of a select few, to the detriment of all the rest.



You can contact Brandon Smith at: brandon@alt-market.comThis e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Join Alt-Market today, find a barter network in your area, or start your own. Insulate yourself and your family from economic collapse before it is too late.








Add to Technorati Favorites

Roger Daltrey Speaks Out

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/8606748/Roger-Daltrey-how-Labours-immigration-policies-screwed-the-British-working-class.html


The musician said the immigration policies of the last Labour government had a disastrous effect as British workers found themselves undercut by Europeans prepared to accept lower wages.

Labour "left the British working man screwed like he'd never been screwed before by cheap labour coming in from Europe", Daltrey said.

He added: "We do need immigration, but surely it should be a level playing field where they can't undercut every working class bloke in England for their jobs."

Daltrey, 67, grew up in working class Shepherd's Bush, west London, and is fiercely proud of his roots. Too poor to afford a musical instrument, he fashioned his first guitar out of a block of wood and some wire.

He passed the 11-plus and attended a local grammar school but was expelled at 15 and worked as an electrician's mate, tea-boy and apprentice sheet metal worker before finding fame with The Who.

In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, Daltrey also criticised the Government for failing to help rural areas and described the current crop of British politicians as "tragic". He now lives in east Sussex, where he runs a trout fishery, and was a member of the Countryside Alliance until he quit in protest at the organisation's focus on fox hunting.

"I live 50 miles from London and we've got some of the highest levels of teenage and childhood poverty in the country. It's disgusting. Just because it's a rural area, it gets forgotten," Daltrey complained.

"I'm not anti-fox hunting because, to me, shooting foxues is even worse and the results are horrendous. So don't tell me the fox hunting debate was about animal welfare, because I can't take that hypocrisy. It was class war, and that's what I hated."

Despite the advancing years, the man who once sang "Hope I die before I get old" is about to begin a tour of the UK and North America, performing songs from The Who's rock opera, Tommy.







Add to Technorati Favorites

The Immigration Invasion Continues

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/256076/Population-soars-470-000-a-year-in-migration-boom



THE devastating effect of Labour’s shambolic immigration policy over the past decade has helped push Britain’s population through the 62-million barrier.


Last year’s 470,000 rise is the biggest for nearly half a century, Government figures revealed yesterday, and is enough people to fill a city the size of Manchester.

The increase took the UK’s population in July 2010 to 62.2 million – 3.1 million more than nine years earlier.

Campaigners said the shocking figures bore out earlier warnings about Labour’s lax immigration policy.

Yesterday Sir Andrew Green, Chairman of MigrationWatch UK, said: “These are astonishing figures.

“They are further evidence that the Government must take urgent steps to get a grip of immigration which is a major factor in this unprecedented population growth.

“The alternative is substantial extra investment in public services for which there is no money.”


We have warned about the results of an open-door immigration policy
Paul Nuttall, MEP and Ukip deputy leader


Paul Nuttall, MEP and Ukip deputy leader, said: “We have warned about the results of an open-door immigration policy.”

Government statisticians yesterday said the 0.8 per cent annual rise – the highest since 1962 – was mainly due to the biggest baby boom in a decade.

In the 12 months to July 2010, there were 797,000 births, around 10,000 more than the previous year and 134,000 more than in 2001/02 when the country’s population was 59.1 million.

The relatively high birth rate among the growing number of immigrant families was a significant factor, the Office of National Statistics said in its ­statistical bulletin published yesterday.


SEARCH UK NEWS for:

Fertility rates of non-UK born females stands at 2.48 children each on average, compared with 1.94 for those women born here.

One in every four babies born in Britain in 2009 was to a migrant mother – the highest since the recording of parents’ country of birth was introduced in 1969.

The net migration boom was fuelled by a drastic fall in people leaving Britain.

Some 574,000 entered the UK last year, up 12,000 on the previous 12 months. But those emigrating fell from 386,000 in 2008/09 to 344,000 a year later.

Last night Immigration Minister Damian Green: “This is yet more ­evidence of the impact that a decade of uncontrolled migration has had on the UK. Net migration has been too high but the controls and reforms we are introducing will bring it back down to the tens of thousands.”

David Cameron has said he wants to bring annual net migration down to just “tens of thousands” by 2015.

But Oxford University’s ­Migration Observatory said last week he was unlikely to meet his deadline.











Add to Technorati Favorites

Youth Pay The Price

Immigration is the betrayal of our youth and their future.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/8609827/UK-jobs-Migrants-take-the-jobs-from-young-Britons.html


Mr Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, will say that tighter immigration controls are vital if Britain is to avoid “losing another generation to dependency and hopelessness”.

He says only immigrants with “something to offer” should be allowed into the country and that too often foreign workers purporting to be skilled take low-skilled jobs that could be occupied by British school leavers.

He warns David Cameron that a “slack” attitude to immigration will result in the Coalition repeating the mistakes made under Labour, when the vast majority of new jobs generated before the recession were taken by immigrants.

His comments represent the strongest criticism of immigration since Downing Street strategists advised that the Government should be tougher on the issue. They will be seen as a warning to Mr Cameron not to allow the Liberal Democrats to dictate a softer policy on the issue.

Mr Duncan Smith, who is in charge of a shake-up of the welfare system, will make his comments in a speech in Spain and they come as official figures show that the UK population is growing at its fastest rate for 50 years, driven by immigration.

Related Articles
Do the British jobless lack the right skills for jobs?
01 Jul 2011
A licence to get tough on welfare
01 Jul 2011
Chief Rabbi: Equality laws leading to new Mayflower exodus
30 Jun 2011
Related Links
You might like:Frank Field: Migrants take nine out of 10 jobs19 Jun 2011(Telegraph News)World-class artists 'put off coming to Britain by intrusive' points-based immigration system'26 Jun 2011(Telegraph News)David Cameron claims asylum law victory24 Jun 2011(Telegraph News)

From the WebFORM THE WEB:Anonymous Hackers Claim Third Attack on Arizona Police02 Jul 2011(FoxNews.com)Bush V. Gore's Disgrace Deepens04 Dec 2010(The Daily Beast)Duchess Kate shows off new royal bracelet28 Jun 2011(MYDaily UK)[what's this]“Even as our economy starts to pick up, and new jobs are created, there is a risk that young people in Britain won’t get the chances they deserve because businesses will continue to look elsewhere,” he will say.

The Work and Pensions Secretary will tell his audience that, before the recession, foreign nationals accounted for a “significant portion” of the rise in employment in Britain.

He will add: “And as we come out the other side we are seeing the situation repeat itself, with more than half of the rise in employment in the past year accounted for by foreign nationals. As a result of the last government’s slack attitude to immigration, it

has become easy for businesses to look abroad for workers.” Mr Duncan Smith believes that some companies are

using immigration as “an excuse to import labour to take up posts which could be filled by people already in Britain”.

He will say: “That’s why we must take tough action on this to tighten the rules on immigration across the major entry routes — work, student visas and family settlement — so that only those who have something clear to offer to the UK are able to come in.”

The Coalition is placing a limit on the number of non-EU workers allowed into the country each year, but Mr Duncan Smith believes that companies and immigrants are still abusing the system

He will say: “I think there’s been a red herring in this debate around skills. A good proportion of foreign nationals in jobs in the UK are in semi or low-skilled occupations.

“And we know that a significant proportion of those coming into the UK purporting to be high-skilled workers have actually been doing low-skilled jobs once in the UK.”

He says Britain needs an immigration system that gives the unemployed “a level playing field”. “If we do not get this right then we risk leaving more British citizens out of work, and the most vulnerable group who will be the most affected are young people,” he will say.

“Controlling immigration is critical or we will risk losing another generation to dependency and hopelessness.”

The warning from Mr Duncan Smith is timely. Recent polling by No 10 indicates that immigration, welfare benefits and crime are key concerns for voters.

Frank Field, the Labour MP and a government adviser on poverty, recently uncovered figures indicating that, in the first year of the Coalition, 87 per cent of the 400,000 newly created jobs went to immigrants.

Mr Duncan Smith had already unveiled plans to simplify the benefits system with a single universal credit designed to ensure that those in work were better off. He also introduced a work programme under which private firms were paid to train and return the long-term unemployed to the workplace.

In a rare speech on immigration earlier this year, Mr Cameron said he wanted to bring annual net migration down to just “tens of thousands” by 2015.












Add to Technorati Favorites

Zionist Whore Greek Banker State

Now we know what the take over of the Greek nation means, its surrender to the power of global capitalism and the Zionists.

The Greek nation is now a nation of debtors and zionist whores abasing themselves before the US and Israel.


http://www.presstv.com/detail/187083.html


American activists took to Twitter on Friday to say they were intercepted by the Greek coast guard just moments after they left Perama port near Athens, a Press TV correspondent reported.

Greece's Civil Protection Ministry said on Friday that the coast guard had been ordered to take “all appropriate measures” to bar Gaza-bound Greek and international ships from leaving Greece's ports.

The ban comes as organizers of the humanitarian aid flotilla to the Gaza Strip say the Tel Aviv regime is making Greece halt the convoy.

They complain that Greece is throwing up “administrative obstacles” for the activists in response to pressure from Israel, the Associated Press reported on Monday.

“We call on the Greek government to let us sail,” Ann Wright said.

The flotilla members also say Israel has attempted to stop them by sabotaging the convoy. They said a joint Greek, Swedish and Norwegian boat was found sabotaged with serious damage to its propeller, a Press TV correspondent reported on Tuesday.

The flotilla activists suspect that Israeli agents were responsible for the damage.

Greece has recently increased relations with Israel, and the two countries are currently holding preliminary talks on potential energy deals. Greece's cash-strapped government has also explored venues to acquire more overseas investment, possibly from Israel, to offset its financial crisis.

Israel's security cabinet has ordered the navy to use all possible means to prevent the incoming international aid flotilla from reaching the Gaza Strip.

Some 1.5 million people in Gaza are being denied their basic rights, including the freedom of movement and the right to appropriate living conditions, work, health and education.














Add to Technorati Favorites

Gaddafi Hated - yeah right !

Gaddafi is hated by the Libyan people the media tell us.


Yeah right ;


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sH9TkKFe7Fk












Add to Technorati Favorites

Birds Of A Feather Flock Together

All people prefer the company of their own people.

That is not racism.

That is naturalism.





Toddlers instinctively play with other young children of the same ethnicity, according to a study.

And children interacting with a contemporary of a different race adjust their behaviour to match their playmate's, scientists claim.

Researcher Nadine Girouard, of Concordia University in Montreal, said: 'We found Asian-Canadian and French-Canadian children seemed to prefer interacting with kids of the same ethnic background.

'Both groups were more interactive with children of the same ethnicity and, when matched with kids from another background, preferred solitary play.'

Scientists visited six nurseries In Montreal and observed the behaviour of 30 second-generation Asian-Canadians and 30 French-Canadians.

The children were paired with peers they had known for at least three months.

French-Canadian children used longer sentences when interacting with same-ethnic peers, yet decreased their verbal interactions when playing with Asian-Canadian peers, the scientists found.

They believe social mores likely prompted a lack of interaction between cultures.
Study co-author Dale Stack, of Concordia University, said: 'Children of both groups adapted their behaviours by speaking less in the case of French-Canadian children and by speaking more in the case of Asian-Canadian children.'

'Children seemed to prefer interacting with kids of the same ethnic background'The research team also observed how multi-cultural playmates could influence conflict among peers of the same ethnicity - findings that contradict previous studies.

'We observed that Asian-Canadian children frequently removed or attempted to remove toys from each other,' explains Ms Girouard.

'When interacting with peers of the same ethnicity, Asian-Canadian pre-schoolers were more competitive.'

She added: 'Consistent with some past research, self-expression and social initiation are highly valued in Canadian culture, self-restraint and cooperation may be more important in Chinese and Asian-Canadian culture and this has an impact on multicultural peer interactions.'

The findings are published in the European Journal of Developmental Psychology.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2009822/Why-toddlers-naturally-gravitate-children-ethnicity.html#ixzz1QxbJo0Lk








Add to Technorati Favorites