Dave Hannam - Pushed or Bailing Out ?

Rumours coming in that appear to suggest that David Hannam is standing down as National Treasurer.

No doubt to be replaced by one of Jim Dowsons merry men perhaps even Paul Golding with his specialised Midas Consultancy sourced hi-tech accounting equipment = an abacus and a pencil from the bookies = £50,000.

Or perhaps even the multi-tasking genius Nick Griffin will take over the role for the party, and add yet another list of his Stakhanovite like endeavours for the party ( or to ensure the cover up according to your own perceptions).


Right then - the question is therefore 'Was he pushed or did he bail out ?'


If they are all smiling and shaking hands, then you know its a lie.


First take a look at Dave Hannams back.

If you see a red stain, then you know he has been knifed in the back.

Then take a look at Hannams trousers.

If you see a brown stain, then you know the Fraud Squad is on the way.

So then - is it Red or Brown ?

The Hunting of an Irish Hare

The Hunting of an Irish Hare.


As the law demands, she is released,
Set free as wildfire upon the wind,
Leaping forth as a flicker of flame,
From a cell of willow, the does bane,
Onto that field where only war awaits,
And the dogs that will decide her fate,
Her bones so brittle betwixt their bites,
As sleek, she slips their endless traps,
With sudden witcheries of motion,
Yet but a whisker away from death,
In his grim guise of coursing hounds,
Breath to breath, they break and turn,
Running her to ground, ravening for a kill.




Every snap of a jaw, howl and growl,
Erupts the cheering, clapping crowd,
Whisky warmed on a cold Galway morn,
For a winners purse on the turn of a paw,
Then with lungs afire, she explodes,
Turning to the west, lightning swift
With twists to trick their trips and kills,
She spurts the soil, jinking hard,
Showing her heels to the hounds,
Who are forced finally to relent,
To bow their heads, and tired pant,
Beaten, and all their passions spent,
As with a final backward mocking glance,
She vanishes forever into the high dry grass.

Liability of BNP members for debts of the BNP

There are four levels of potential legal liability for members of the party that we need to look at ;

1) Civil Law and Case Law eg Contract Law liability

2) Criminal Law

3) Tax Law

4) Tort Law

In relation to Civil Law then what is clear is that all senior officials of the party, elected representatives of the party and appointed officers of the party are all directly liable for any debts of the party.

It is down to argument in any hearing as to the issue of whether liability extends to all the membership of the BNP and what level of liability they each incur.

Case law on the criminal liability of Unincorporated Associations is clear though, in that in relation to the criminal actitivies of an Unincorporated Association, then all the members are jointly liable for the criminal actions of the officers appointed and acting as officers of the association. By staying as members they incur liability jointly for the criminal actions of its officers ;



RL & Anor, R. v (28 August 2008)

RL & Anor, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1970 (28 August 2008)

This appeal by the Crown under section 58 Criminal Justice Act 2003 raised questions relating to the criminal liability of an unincorporated association and of its individual members.

Paragraph 33 “ …..it does not follow that such an association is for all purposes the same as a company or other corporation. It is not. A corporation has, for all legal purposes, independent legal personality. It is also regulated, often heavily. It must have a registered address and registered directors and secretary. An unincorporated association may indeed look very like a corporation in some cases, and it may have standing and de facto independence, but equally it may not. A prosecution which could only be brought against an informal grouping of building workers, or sportsmen, or campaigners would be likely to be wholly ineffective. It is a necessary consequence of the different nature of an unincorporated association that all its members remain jointly and severally liable for its actions done within their authority.”

As to fact, many unincorporated associations have in reality a substantial existence which is treated by all who deal with them as distinct from the mere sum of those who are for the time being members. Those who have business dealings with an unincorporated partnership of accountants, with hundreds of partners world-wide, do not generally regard themselves as contracting with each partner personally; they look to the partnership as if it were an entity. The same is true of those who have dealings with a learned society, or a trade union, or for that matter with a large established golf club. "


Therefore if Griffin and Dowson are found to be guilty of fraud or any other criminal offense that relates to finances, then individual BNP members are liable in law for their actions.

That means those appointed as receivers for the people owed money by the party will then sue each individual member for any monies owed to them by the party.





VAT And Tax Law Liability ;


Under UK tax law, then all the members of an Unincorporated Association are potentially jointly liable for its debts ;


http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/dmbmanual/DMBM530200.htm


DMBM530200 - VAT: Liability for payment: Members of unincorporated associations
An unincorporated association is an association of persons not in partnership and not registered under any Act of Parliament (e.g. the Friendly Societies Act 1992).

Regulation 8 of the VAT Regulations 1995, provides:

“Anything required to be done by or under the Act, these Regulations or otherwise by or on behalf of a club, association or organisation, the affairs of which are managed by its members or a committee or committees of its members, shall be the joint and several responsibility of-

(a) Every member holding office as president, chairman, treasurer, secretary, or any similar office; or in default thereof,

(b) Every member holding office as a member of a committee; or in default of any thereof,

(c) Every member,

provided that if it is done by any official, committee member or member referred to above, that shall be sufficient compliance with any such requirement.”

The liability under Regulation 8 includes a responsibility to pay and account for tax properly. However, as a matter of policy do not attempt to bankrupt any member for the non-payment of association debts.

Although an association is not a legal entity separate from its members it may be wound up as an unregistered company under Part V of the Insolvency Act 1986 if its constitution and rules provide for it to be so wound up.



Liability for Unlawful Suspensions of Members.


As BNP members are liable for debts of the party, then this also includes cases such as a BNP member has gone to court to get back into the party ;


http://www.maceandjones.co.uk/news/archive/unincorporated-associations.html

A key criterion for unincorporated association is that it is governed by rules created by the membership, representing the terms of the contract between them. There is no legal requirement for these rules to be written down. As unincorporated associations are creatures of contract, it is theoretically possible for an association to be based on an oral agreement. However, associations nearly always have written rules in order to avoid disputes between members, to protect the position of management committee members and to clarify the purposes for which the association exists. Yet in the sector, oral agreements of this nature are commonplace.

A member cannot be expelled from an unincorporated association unless the rules allow. Even where the rules do provide for expulsion, the association must exercise its powers of expulsion in good faith, or it may be possible for the expelled member to obtain an injunction and damages.



Tort Law ;

http://www.maceandjones.co.uk/news/archive/unincorporated-associations.html

All members of an association may be held liable if they are all carrying out a particular activity which gives them rise to a tort (e.g. negligence).


http://www.collyerbristow.com/Default.aspx?sID=108&cID=125&ctID=43&lID=0&filter=1

Whether you are a member of a political party, the secretary of a golf club or the treasurer to a jazz club, you could incur personal liability on behalf of your unincorporated association because they are not legal entities. Unlike companies, unincorporated associations cannot sue or be sued. Members have a contractual relationship between them which does not confer the limited liability of a company. This means that members who enter into contracts with third parties on behalf of their association can become personally liable under that contract. In addition, members could be liable in tort either through activities of their fellow members or the association's occupation of premises.

Contractual liability rests on those who authorised the contract. If a member signs a contract for the purchase of property on the committee's authorisation, the committee members will be contractually liable. The committee is normally contractually liable for all contracts made in the course of business, but the courts often look to see which members have most involvement. A member is personally liable if he enters into contracts on behalf of the association without authority or acts in excess of authority given him. However, even if a contract has not been authorised, members will be liable if they then ratify the contract in some way, e.g. using the goods purchased. The financial liability of members is not limited to the funds of the association and therefore the rules should be drafted to take account of this.

The Leeds Trial, Collett Con and A Falling Out Amongst Thieves.

One of the truly tragic examples of how Griffin protects himself, and screws decent nationalists over, is what happened at the Leeds Trial of Mark Collett and Nick Griffin.

Now anyone who knows Collett knows he is an arrogant prick.

During the Leeds Trial Collett went out for a drink with the security team that was led by Warren Bennett, a truly dedicated British Nationalist and professional security officer.

The times when I had spoken to Warren about security issues were many, and each time his main emphasis was on protecting Griffin and protecting his lads in the security team.

Warren was always a true professional.

During this drink with the security lads Collett got drunk and started to throw his weight around.

As a result of him giving one of the security lads a bit of lip, he got a little slap for his trouble.

Instead of just shutting up and keeping quiet, Collett allegedly tried to pull a knife on the security lad.

This of course was a very, very silly thing to do.

After being disarmed, Collett then started to shout out to the security team ’You better all back off as if you don’t I will go Queens Evidence against Griffin. “

Collett was removed from the pub and taken back to his hotel.

I was then invited by Warren Bennett for a conference with him and a witness about what had happened.

Now Warren was worried about two things, first the fact that Collett was a total liability for the party and his security team and secondly about Colletts threat to go Queens Evidence.

Warren told me that his security team had decided not to offer Collett any more protection.

Griffin though had made it plain to me that if the security team would not guard Collett as well as him then in his own words ’they can all fuck off’.

On the issue of Collett saying he would go Queens Evidence - Griffin said nothing.

Nothing at all.

It was as if the fact Mark Collett had said this did not register in his mind.

Instead the security team went on strike and were all expelled by Griffin or resigned from the party.

But later events revealed why Griffin was so determined to protect Collett.

I believe that Collett and Griffin had both been involved in the ’leaflet scam’ that had been going on for years in the party.

I suspect that Collett was giving Nick Griffin a nice little slice of the cut from the scam.

This can be easily proved by checking the bank accounts of collett and seeing if he made any regular large cash withdrawals.

If he did so, then they went to Griffin.

It was this threat, to go Queens Evidence and reveal their actions and cons together, that so terrified Griffin.

Griffin in the end sacked the entire security team to save his own neck.

He protected Collett, a man who had threatened to betray him, rather than stand up for the security men who put their lives on the line for him.

This whole episode makes sense only if you analyse later events in the party.

When Griffin revealed at the meeting just before the General Election that he had just discovered that Collett had been stealing from the party, this was a lie.

He had known long before that as Jenny Noble, the Party Treasurer, had informed him of Colletts theft from the party over a year before - and Griffin had done nothing.

Sorry I am wrong.

Griffin did do something - he immediately sacked Jenny Noble as Party Treasurer.

I knew Jenny Noble very well, and no-one in the party idolised Nick Griffin more than her.

Jenny Nobles integrity, her honesty, her committment to the BNP and her loyalty to Griffin was second to none.

Yet as soon as she did her job as Party Treasurer, which was to tell him she had discovered that Collett had been over charging the party for at least £40,000 per year for leaflets, Griffin removed her from her position.

Now that may also have been due to the fact that Jenny also discovered that Griffin was using the Trafalgar Club as a private slush fund, but the main reason was her discovery of Colletts scam.

But instead of thanking her and going to the police, Griffin sacked her to shut her up.

Now why would Griffin sack Warren Bennett and Jenny Noble to protect Collett ?

Why would Griffin allow Collett to carry on using the scam even though he had been made aware it was happening by Jenny Noble ?

Simple.

Griffin had been involved in it all along.

For years Griffin and Collett were almost a couple, in a strange almost Greek homo-erotic ’older man, younger boy’ type of way.

In many ways their relationship resembled the supposed homosexual relationship Griffin had been involved in with Webster years before, where the older Nationalist Martin Webster supposedly introduced the young Griffin to the inner sanctum of Nationalism in exchange for a little bit of gay hanky panky on the side.

Collett was like a little puppy forever yapping around his masters feet.

It was obvious that they had been involved in this scam for years together, and when Collett threatened to expose Griffin and the con during the Leeds Trial then because he was as deep in the shite as Collett then Griffin had to protect Collett at all costs - which is the exact same situation we see today with Jim Dowson.

The fall out with Collett was, I believe, due to Nick telling Mark Collett ’Mark you are going to stop the scam now. I wont reveal what you did in the past as to do so will destroy my reputation as well. But I am now involved in a real money making scam with Jim Dowson and the chump change we used to make together is now meaningless. “

Dowson came along and opened Griffins eyes up to a whole new world of scams to rob the BNP membership.

What he and Collett had been doing with their little leaflet scam was pathetic in comparison to the money Griffin and Dowson could make.

So out went Collett, kicking and screaming about corruption in the party - but unable to reveal what he knew as he would incriminate himself at the same time as he incriminated Griffin.

Today the BNP is in a worse situation than with Collett.

Collett was a small scale crook, whilst Dowson is a major thief.

Griffin has swopped the petty Mark Collett ‘BNP leaflet scam’ for a multi-million pound scam with Jim Dowson.

Griffin has to go and Dowson also.

Any man who will betray the very security team who would have given their lives to save him is not fit to be involved in British Nationalism.

The Law On Sexual Assault

Here is an explanation of the law on Sexual Assault.


When a sleeping woman wakes in bed up to find a man holding her, groping her body and trying to get on top of her then that is classified as a Sexual Assault under the S.3 Sexual Offences Act 2003 ;


Sexual assault
(1)
A person (A) commits an offence if—
(a)
he intentionally touches another person (B),
(b)
the touching is sexual,
(c)
B does not consent to the touching, and
(d)
A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
(2)
Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.
(3)
Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.
(4)
A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—
(a)
on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or both;
(b)
on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years.

Where Next For the BNP

The BNP now has various options facing it.


The first is that it continues as it is.

That means the cult members ignore the allegations of sexual assault against Dowson, the allegations of theft, fraud and financial mismanagement are ignored and the party continues as a cult around Griffin.

The public image of the party has been destroyed, the fact that the allegations of sexual abuse have been ignored are used to destroy the parties credibility in election after election (no-one will vote for a party led by perverts who are protected by Griffin) and it staggers on drawing in 2-3 % in local elections until finally Richard Barnbrook is voted out of the GLA, our sitting councillors are wiped away and eventually both Griffin and Brons are voted out.

This is the Griffin Option.

Griffin has stated many times in the past that he is not the man to lead the party forward into the future.

His statement that he will stay on for four years was designed solely to allow him to financially feather his own retirement nest.

He is an albatross around the neck of the party, whose endless gaffes have devastated our party image, our internal skills base (by him purging people or good people being sickened by his actions and leaving) and damaged our ability to reach out to the masses.

The senior officers in the party are obviously either self serving minions or who are on the payroll, as if they truly cared about the party and its Nationalist principles then they would demand the following ;


1) An independent internal investigation into all the allegations

2) A Reconciliation Committee be set up to allow people to air their greivances and allow the party to go forward

3) internal changes to protect party officers and employed officers of the party from un lawful dismissal in order to financially protect the party

4) internal changes to protect members from unawful suspensions.

These are the bare minimum of what is required.

But even these are too much for Griffin and his cabal of foot lickers and idiot sycophants that surround him.


The BNP vote has fallen to a new low over recent months.

The party is bankrupt and its skill base so damaged by purges and resignations, that Griffin has now appointed himself the London Organiser as well as being an MEP and Chairman of the party.

Even though he spends half his time in Brussels and half his time in Wales - he now thinks he can be the London Organiser as well.

The man is truly delusional.

The vote we are achieving now is pathetic.

But that will get worse, as the internal skills base of the party comprised of our most dedicated, talented and hard working activists have just been purged by Griffin.

In relation to internal skills, the party is now back to around 1995.

We as a Nationalist movement do not have another twenty years to win the struggle, nor do we have four more years to wait until Griffin retires.

In four years time the nationalist movement under Griffin will have been destroyed.

Whilst the British people are angrier than ever, they have en masse rejected the BNP as the vehicle for their political greivances.

That is because they despise Griffin.

Unlike the inner cult members of the BNP, they see him for what he is.

The ONLY people that sustain Griffin's position are the morons in the party that still believe the asinine party propaganda put out by Griffins supporters.

They are as much a liability as Griffin, for without their support then Griffin would be forced to resign.

Now if Griffin does resign who should lead the BNP ?

I personally believe that the 'Cult of Personality' that is a feature of British Nationalism, and a relic from its days of Mosley and Tyndall, is as dangerous to our future political development as Griffin is.

Frankly it is embarrasing that intelligent Nationalists feel they have to fawn over and flatter little men with big ego's.

It makes the party over centralised and infantile, and leads to senior officers having to arse lick 'the leader' to get their jobs done.

The BNP does not need a a new leader, it needs a whole new leadership.


The BNP must reform on the following model in order to advance ;

A) The role of the Chairman of the party must be scrapped. In its place comes a party President whose sole power is to cast the deciding vote in any Executive Council meeting if the vote it tied. The Presidents role will be to ensure good order at meetings, to follow procedure at meetings and to ensure accountability from officers delegated responsibilities by the Executive Council.

2) The Executive Council of the party will be comprised of senior party officers with a vote. They then vote on proposals put forward by officers and members. No decision is taken in the party as regards business decisions, staff appointments, disciplinary actions, staff sackings etc etc unless the issue is first debated and voted on.

3) Regional Organisers are appointed by their local members by a majority vote. That way the best people locally get the job, as opposed to Griffins placemen being given roles they are not suitable for - such as when Griffin appoints himself the new London organiser.

Candidates put themselves forward and are voted in by the members who know them and who work with them, and this ensures the most dedicated and skilled activists are appointed, not Griffin stooges.

4) All officials of the party must be appointed solely on the grounds of long standing loyalty and service to the party, competence in their roles and integrity in their personal character.

The BNP is a pathetic over centralised relic of the Cold War.

Griffin appoints people not on the basis of talent or loyalty to the party, its members or British Nationalist principles but solely on the basis of their loyalty to him.

This has meant the party is run by over paid incompetents whose only talent is arse licking Griffin.

We must never again have a party run as a cult around one person.

The BNP is a dinosaur of a party, both in relation to its functions and form.

However much Griffin and his cronies talk about 'modernisation and professionalism' the party will always still be lumbered with Griffin, his idiotic constitution and over centralised around him.

The idiot at the top appoints other idiots who then do an incompetent and idiotic job for the party.

When the party talks about 'modernisation and proffessionalism' it must start with ;

1) Removing the position as Chairman. Whoever is Chairman has too much power, too little accountability and too much of a public profile. The post of Chairman is a total liability for the party, as we have seen with Griffins regular abuses of power over the years.

The present power of the chairman under Griffins constitution is a dictator.

He can do as he wants when he wants, as we have all seen time after time.

That is not the constitution of a democratic political party, it is the constitution of dictatorship and one that I would argue is inherently unlawful as regards the parties role in a democracy.

A new constitution must be drafted to protect the members, to protect employees of the party and to protect officers of the party.



2) Appointing people into the Executive Council on the basis of a proven track record of loyalty to the party.

Those on the Executive Council are appointed by the members on the basis of their skills, wisdom, loyalty, personal integrity and honesty.

The party members should be able to vote for the ten officers that sit on the Executive Council.

They stand for election as officers of the EC and are voted in by the members.

They must promise to serve only the interests of the party in their roles and also to protect the rights of members and to act only in regard to the interests of British Nationalism.

Those individual EC officers can be removed only by a majority vote of the EC or by a vote from the members expressing no confidence in them.

The Executive Council role is to appoint party officers on two criteria - their qualifications and loyalty to the party.

The Executive Council will appoint say a Party Business Officer.

They will ensure they are investigated, their qualifications checked and their business credentials verified.

They will then order an outside employment lawyer to draft up their contract.

They will also be made to sign a formal legal agreement as regards their duties to the party. They will be made to join the party and agree to bound by internal party disciplinary procedures such as in the event they molest a female BNP member and need to be expelled for doing so.

If the qualification check is passed as correct, they join the party and agree to be bound by the party internal disciplinary procedures and they also sign their contract- then these documents will then be passed to the Executive Council to vote on.

If the vote is a majority one it is passed and they are appointed and tasked by the EC to do their job.

Then every couple of months they will attend an EC meeting with a report on what they have been doing.

In the meantime the EC communicate on a daily basis with each other as regards internal party performance and activities.

The EC will read this evaluation report and then debate amongst themselves on their performance as an appointed officer.

If they are happy with the work they are doing, then they sign them off for a further period.

If there any problems then either the EC can investigate as a group or appoint an investigating officer to find out any potential issues.

If the issues are serious the EC can vote for sacking, expulsion from the party or an investigation to be undertaken by the parties properly appointed and trained Internal Affairs Unit who are tasked to investigate such issues.

Then the parties properly constituted and trained Disciplinary Panel will be tasked by the EC to follow the existing legal case law and party constitutional procedures and suspend them prior to a full disciplinary hearing.

At every level of the party nepotism, corruption, secrecy and abuse of power must be reined in and prevented.

The more the party is open and accountable to scrutiny from its senior officers then the safer the party and the members are from abuses of power by officers who are accountable only to Griffin for their actions.

At the moment one person does the hiring, one person decides they are doing a good job and one person fires them.

That is Griffin.

And that is a monstrous and truly pathetic conflict of interest.

No organisation, let alone a political party, can be run like that.

Without internal structures and accountability - then abuses of power are able to occur as we have seen time after time.


At the same time as the party reforms internally, the parties internal training skills must be ramped up.

Many good people who have left the BNP would rejoin if Griffin and Dowson resigned.

Their skills would be able to be then utilised again.

Rather than the party relying for its entire public image on one man, the party will become a localised movement that concentrates on community activism and community building.

I have spent the last year designing for the party a revolutionary Political Activism, Community Activism and Community Building Model.

I was planning to run this out for the party, and I note that Griffin is still going to try and peddle some of my ideas as part of his Civil Rights Group.

Griffin is clueless on what is required.

I have fed him the bare bones of the Model, but he has has no idea how to run it, integrate it or ensure it functions as a model.

His 'idea' for a Civil Rights Group is simply intellectual plagiarism from yours truly.

He will cock it up as he always does and appoint people with the wrong ideas, the wrong skills with the wrong tactics following the wrong strategy.

He will run it as a money making scam, rather than what is required.

Griffin is intellectually vapid.

All he does is steal the credit for other peoples ideas - such as Solidarity which I thought up, set up and got running and also the Civil Liberty group which I thought up and set up and got running.

I know Griffin better than virtually any other party officer apart from Simon darby and Dowson, and they know he doesnt have good ideas.

He just steals them and then tries to pretend they are his.

All you get with Griffin is always negative.

Griffin and the New Axis

It appears that when interviewed by the BBC concerning his junket to Japan, Adam Walker of the BNP felt he could not condemn the atrocities the Japanese inflicted on British soldiers during the war - link to audio here ;

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00tcsvh


Now for the Green Arrow Orclings and the retards that seem to be running them European Nationalist Block in the EU heres a few facts ;

1) The European Union is in EUROPE.

2) Japan is not in EUROPE.

3) I support forming a EUROPEAN NATIONALIST BLOCK, what I do not support and nor do the European people is a NEW NAZI AXIS GROUPING both in the EU and outside it.

4) The political parties in Europe that are heirs of Nazi parties or the direct descendants of Nazi parties must never be seen to be recreating or attempting to form The Axis Powers Block of pre-WW2.

By the European Nationalist Parties doing this, and in the same week as the celebration of VJ Day was underway, was either as a result of the most inept strategic planning in human history or was a deliberate attempt to undermine the European Nationalist Block itself.

The ONLY political party that benefited from the trip to Japan was the nutters in the Far Right Japanese parties, who will love it now the westerners have come crawling to them in the same week they honour and revere their war dead who are the same war criminals that slaughtered British soldiers.

For the Japanese people, they are motivated by what is known as 'face'. In other words they gain respect and power when people are seen as subservient to them,.

The fact that in the same week that the British people honoured their war dead, a representative of a British political party went to the shrine where they honour their war dead, who were war criminals who slaughtered tens of thousands of British troops, will give them great face.

At the same time they will be now holding the BNP in utter contempt for doing so.

Walker knows this as much as I do, as he understands the Japanese mindset - so the question is, why did he go along with it ?

The European Nationalist parties who also attended this trip with the BNP couldnt give a toss about the Far East war that British troops fought in, as most of their oldest supporters were busy fighting British troops in Europe at the time.

For the BRITISH NATIONAL party to have gone with a EU wide group of people who can now be depicted as nostalgic for the Third Reich and supped with the Japanese political party, despised even by most decent Japanese people for their glorification of genocide and murder, is the politics of the madhouse.

For Adam Walker then not to condemn the atrocities committed against British troops is insane.

Walker is a clever man.

Not condemning the murders of British troops is unforgivable. It will now be used against him for the rest of the time he acts as a spokesman for the BNP.

He can no longer be trusted with any media opportunities. He is a good bloke, but his judgement has proven to be flawed.

The fact that the bnp went on this junket had to be Griffins idea.

I suspect he did what he usually did - as I have discovered his methodology.

Griffin is either working for the State or he is the most cynical, vile opportunist ever to have wormed their way, into British Nationalist politics.

You can decide for yourself.

Griffin sent Adam Walker to Japan in order to discredit Walker and to cause the media to attack the BNP and thereby this would cause the party to rally around Griffin during this period of time.

Whenever the BNP has an election to fight, and a good chance of victory and a good candidate standing in that election, Griffin says something so stupid to the media so that the media can then destroy our core support in society, destroy the candidates chance to win the seat ( and so ensures no-one in the party can be seen as a competent politician to challenge Griffin ) and it also ensures that when the media then attack Griffin for talking bollocks the Griffinites in the party rally around Griffin.

Take Question Time.

The media and political elite all knew the BNP was cresting on a wave of political support that had to be destroyed, so they call in their useful idiot Griffin to play the media game with them.

I asked Griffin for weeks before the programme was filmed to pull out.

I said that on the day of the show, Griffin should ring in and sayd 'I have the flu, and Andrew Brons is coming' - this would have meant that the whole panel who had been briefed on the endless idiotic statements made by Griffin over the years would have been left with nothing to say.

Also when they all would have tried to attack Andrew Brons they would have made themselves look just like bullies.

Instead Griffin, Dowson and Golding overruled this common sense suggestion.

So in struts Griffin for the cameras and the news, surrounded by bodyguards in sunglasses so as to portray himself as some cut price gangster.

Griffin knew he would be torn to peieces but he didnt care - as Griffin wasnt interested in our vote, elections etc - all he was interested in was securing his own power base and income within the party.

The fact the media attacked him after the Question Time debacle guaranteed that the Griffinite Cult Members in the BNP would flatter and fawn over him even more.

You see in the small mind of a Griffinite what matters most of all is Griffin, not our vote or loyalty to the members.

They circle him like idiot sea lions clapping away whenever he throws them another rotten fish.

Griffin doesnt care about British Nationalism.

Griffin doesnt care about the British people.

Griffin doesnt care about good officers being in the party as they may challenge him for leadership.

Griffin doesnt care about winning elections.

Griffin doesnt care about the party.

Griffin cares about just two things, himself and money.