A Few Answers To Questions

1) Why did I stay in the BNP so long if I knew all this was happening ?

When you have phone calls coming in from old people living in a street where Islamist gangs are ethnically cleansing whites from the area and they are begging you for help, you then realise that if you do not help them no-one will.

The police wont as they are too scared of being called 'racist'.

The council wont as they are too scared of being called 'racist'.

They cant afford a solicitor.

Those are the sort of calls I had every week.

I have heard stories that have made me weep, tales of young underage girls raped by Muslim paedophile gangs and the police refusing to help, and my work with the real heroes of Nationalism like Marlene Guest has forced the police to undertake prosecutions such as the ones that are underway at the moment in Rotherham.

Whilst there are dozens and dozens of charities to help every ethnic group in Britain with racism etc etc - there is just one charity in the whole of Britain to help the White indigenous English people.

Just one.

There isnt a single charity to help white British victims of racism and religious abuse.

Not one.

Thats the reality of the society we live in.

The Far Left weep endless crocodile tears for ethnic minorities, but no-one gives a damn about our people.

They were who I was trying to help.

I am proud of the help I have given to those desperate and abandoned people.

That pride counters out my shame for hiding from people what Griffin is.

BNP activists will note that I have not attended a single BNP meeting, bar one, for years.

This is because whilst I despised what was happening in the party I still wanted to help the people who came to the party for help.

I have helped thousands of people.

Some a lot, some a little.

What is really sad is that now the people who used to come to the BNP for help and whose details were passed to me will now have no-one to help them.

What will probably happen now is that Dowson will take their details and then send them an e mail or letter asking for donations.




2) Am I starting another party ?


N0. The ENA idea is simply a project that I set up to see how the ideological idea of an organisation like the ENA would go down with Nationalists.

It was also a way to reveal the major strategic and tactical flaws in the so called 'far right block' in the EU - so as to demonstrate that their strategic thinkers really need to do more strategic thinking.




3) Am I taking it badly that I resigned the BNP.


No. Its like a weight off of my shoulders.

Forcing myself to be a hypocrite in order to protect the BNP from Griffins endless witless mistakes and having to take the lead in 'spinning' our failures as victories was something I despised doing.

Having to endlessly deal with Griffins mad ideas, pull him back from the brink of perpetual public relations disasters and trying to limit the damage caused by Dowson and his orclings was a total nightmare.

I now sleep at night with a clear conscience.

Those intelligent BNP activists who still remain loyal to a man who will stab you in the back the minute you deviate from unconditional obedience are idiotic.

As I have said the only people that respect Griffin are the people who do not know him.

This is why party after party, year after year good people have gotten to know Griffin and then left in disgust.

The only people that support him are the people who believe the propaganda the BNP constantly pumps out or the people in the BNP who are being paid too.

Those who do not know Griffin know nothing of the real Griffin.

To believe in the political propaganda that makes Griffin look like some sort of 'hero' is pathetic.

If you want a real BNP hero then look no further than Simon Bennet or Marlene Guest, they are the real BNP heroes.

If you want to have a glimpse of the real Griffin then go and visit the writer Dominic Carmans Youtube site here ;


http://www.youtube.com/user/dominiccarman67#p/u


On the right hand side of the screen you will see it says 'Upload' - click on that and all 49 videos drop down for you to watch.

These are secret camera films he made when interviewing Griffin for a book he was writing.

Thats a glimpse of Griffin when he thinks he isnt being filmed or in public.

Thats what I had to deal with for all those years.





4) What do I think of the leadership election result ?

What did you expect.

Griffin makes Robert Mugabe look like Gandhi.

If Griffin ever run Britain then Zimbabwe would demand sanctions be imposed upon us.

The question is what do people do next ?

It appears that many people in the BNP do not care for truth, honesty, loyalty to comrades or the principles of Nationalism.

They will support Griffin either until they are purged themselves or the party collapses.

So the options remain open.

It is for the people who care about the BNP and who are still in the BNP to decide what comes next.

My view is simply this.

Any individual who will ignore allegations of sexual assault in the BNP and remain silent and do nothing about that are complicit in that crime.

False or true such allegations demanded an investigation.

For good people to close their eyes to such things means they are not British Nationalists, they are cult members.

For good people to ignore the stabbing in the back of dozens of loyal, long serving councillors, organisers and activists proves they are deluded morons.

Such people deserve all they get.

The BNP should be a shining beacon to guide our people and to lead us into a better future - instead it is has become a money making scam riddled with Griffinite cultists who will pretend that they do not know that the party turns a blind eye to such things as allegations of sexual abuse in its senior ranks.

That is not a political party that can be trusted with power.

That is a national disgrace.

Unless Griffin goes and with him Dowson then I will never stop attacking the BNP as an organisation under their control, simply as those who will work with such filth as Griffin has appointed like Dowson and Golding are the enemies of everything I hold dear as a true Briton - these being things like loyalty, honour and British Nationalist principles.





5) Did anyone vote for Marlene Guest in the leadership election ?


It would have been nice if they could but unfortunately her paperwork to stand was ignored by the people running the election and she was ignored.

Aaah the 'democratic' BNP at its best.




6) Have I had any threats yet ?


Yesterday I had my first threatening phone call.

The phone rang and a heavy breather spent three or four minutes breathing heavily at then put the phone down.

Unfortunately they forgot to block their telephone number when they rang me.

So I rang them back and told them next time it would probably be a good idea to withhold their number if they want to try and put the frighteners on someone.

Doh !


I have the number - anyone interested in having it ?

Apparently it may be one of the companies linked to Jim Dowson.

The Simon Bennet Affair - The Truth At Last

Over the last few weeks I have seen the Griffinite orcs unleashed upon the former BNP webmaster Simon Bennet at the behest of their master Sauron Griffin.

Chief amongst the Orc army has been various orclings from the Green Arrow website, a site run by the delusional idiot Paul Morris, a man that even Griffin regards with utter contempt, though he will of course massage the ego's of such underlings with a phone call or two when he needs to deploy his Orclings to do his dirty work for him when required.

Paul Morris is man so utterly subservient to Griffins every whim that if you look up the word 'sycophant' in the dictionary you will see a picture of Paul Morris acting as Griffin's footstool.

Not that Morris knows Griffin of course, Morris knows Griffin like I know President Obama.

But Morris is so delusional he even believes his own propaganda about Griffin.

Anyway, the chief target of the Green Slimes animosity has been Simon Bennett.

I will now recount the truth of why Simon Bennett left the BNP and why he in fact will one day be regarded as one of the true British Nationalists and patriots who genuinely put the interests of the BNP before his own interests - and especially his own financial interests.

Another glaring example of the true level of Griffins utter incompetence was during the last European Election campaign.

During the early stages of the European Election campaign I got a telephone call from Simon Bennet who was in a state of total panic.

Now Simon Bennett was a BNP man who if you asked him to do something for the party he would do it immediately, in fact I have known him spend 48 hours at a time in front of his computer trying to install some futuristic, hi-tech gadget into the old BNP website so the site could get higher rankings and more traffic for the party.

His loyalty to the party and dedication to the party were second to none, and I can honestly say that he and activists like Eddy Butler, Richard Barnbrook, Richard Edmonds, Michael Barnbrook, Lawrence Rustem, Jenny Noble, Wendy Russell, James Whittle and Brian Mahoney were inspirations to me for all the work and effort they put into the party.

I may have had my disagreements with them, but they are truly loyal to the parties best interests - though of course that will not save them from the chop if they dare cross Dowson.

All those who truly know Simon, know what he did for the party.

Anyway Simon had rung me in a state of total panic.

He had realised that all the European Election leaflets which were being distributed in the European Election had used stock images stolen from an internet based private images company by Paul Golding under the orders of the Gollum, Jim Dowson, and that we had not obtained a license to use them.

Simon had read the companies 'fair use policy and estimated that if the company sued us we would be liable for about one and a half million pounds in direct damages due to the theft of their images on the leaflet.

This wasnt the first time this had happened.

The image of Winston Churchill also used on the leaflets was a private photograph owned by the family of the photographer Yousuf Karsh ;

http://www.famouspictures.org/mag/index.php?title=The_Churchill_Portrait

They also lodged a copyright claim against the party which was ignored.

People will also remember the stolen Spitfire image used by Jim Dowson for his 'Rob The BNP Roadshow' where he took his collecting tin and rattled it around the country to fill his pockets with chump change from the gullible members during the European Election campaign.

That also was another copyright claim which I managed to settle with Reuters News Agency that owned the copyright on the image by assuring them we would not use the image again, and then promptly found out that Dowson and his assistant 'Ruprecht the Monkey Boy' Paul Golding were still using it !!!!

I said to Simon Bennet ’ can you pay for the extended license to use the images out of your own money right now to cover the party in case someone in the UAF has the wit to contact the image owners and get them to sue us‘.

Even though we were still in total breach of the fair use policy of the image licenses I hoped that by us actually bothering to buy the license this would then pacify the company enough for them not to sue us.

Simon to his immense credit did just that.

He paid around five hundreds pounds out of his own money right there and then to buy the image licenses to protect the BNP.

Simon Bennet is no Searchlight agent who was trying to destroy the BNP from within.

Searchlight didnt need an infiltrator to destroy the BNP, Griffin and his idiot dwarf Jim Dowson are doing the job brilliantly for them.

Simon Bennet is a decent, honourable British Nationalist.

The lies spread by the Griffinite idiots about him are disgusting.

Simon Bennet deserves nothing but respect for putting his Nationalist principles before the opportunity to get on the payroll with the rest of the spongers like Paul Golding and the retarded halfwit, Clive Jefferson.

Simon Bennet was offered a series of financial bribes by Jim Dowson to get him to do as Dowson and Griffin wished, which was to take the website out of the hands of the BNP and put it into the hands of Dowson.

Simon has published these e mail and text messages showing that Dowson offered him bribes to hand over the website on the British Democracy forum - but as usual the truth is like sunlight to a vampire for a Green Arrow or VNN Vermin Forum orcling. They will seek the comfortable darkness of self delusion every time, rather than face the harsh glare of an uncomfortable truth.

The reason why they both wanted the website was because Simon Bennet had turned it into a massively successful income generating machine, and as it was making money then Jim Dowson like the Gollum he is, demanded control over it so he could divert the money from being used inside the party and into his pockets and the pockets of his little cabal of crooks in the form of percentage slices of the income cake.

If you read a leaked copy of the accounts you will see that Paul Golding ALONE was getting around £450.00 a week from the website.

This was why Simon fought so hard to save the website, as the money it was raising was being sliced away by commissions awarded to all those who were lackeys of Dowson.

As far as I am aware Jim Dowson takes a slice, Arthur Kemp takes a slice, Chris Barnett takes a slice and Paul Golding takes a slice of the income from the present 'Blue Peter cornflake box' website that is on the internet.

( UPDATE - I have just been rung by Arthur Kemp and he has stated to me that he does not get a commission from income generated by the BNP website. For the sake of accuracy I will publish here what Arthur has just told me to ensure the accuracy of this article is not challenged )



( UPDATE - It appears that Chris Barnett, the BNP webmaster, does not get a cut of the donations commission for running the website. Chris mate, you should we very pissed off about that - why is Dowson taking a cut and Golding a cut when you are doing the work on the site and Arthur doing the writing on the site and you both dont get commission !!!!

Sorry mate, but you must be bonkers to put up with an arrangement like that. )

Work out for yourself just how much of the money is going into the party for the benefit of the party and the nationalist movement.

Not one of the people who has attacked Simon Bennet as a ‘traitor’ knows Nick Griffin nor the facts about the BNP website fallout nor about Simon as an individual.

Simon fought for months to keep the BNP website out of the grubby, clammy hands of Jim Dowson.

Simon only pulled the website down when he feared that officials of the BNP were attempting to steal the site from him.

Simon only did this after being forced too.

The whole thing could have been avoided if Griffin had done what I asked him to do, which was to simply pay Simon the money he was owed for the work he had done designing and building the website and for his wages - which worked out at about Ten Grand.

Simon was prepared to take just what money he was owed, hand the website over to the party and walk away from the BNP.

Instead Griffin took Gollum Dowsons advice and without even letting me know authorised his orcling Kemp to try and steal the website from Simon.

If any damage was done to the parties image in the lead up to the General Election campaign it was because Griffin and Dowson ignored my advice to simply pay Simon what he was owed.

This would have allowed us to keep control of the website as it was, ensure simon stayed on board with the party to stop any negative fallout and publicity being generated if he decided to go public and spill the beans about what had been going on, to keep the website as it was and the internet community that formed around it still active as a community hub for activists to use and to ensure that the income stream going into the website continued as it was.

Instead the greed of Dowson triumphed over the dictates of reason.

The real damage done to the party in the lead up to the General Election campaign though had nothing to do with Simon Bennett.

That damage was the result of Griffin's utterly moronic public announcement in the weeks leading up the election that Mark Collett had been expelled from the party for 'trying to assassinate him'.

The damage this idiotic statement by Griffin made to the media was immense.

It destroyed our public image almost entirely.

For Griffin to put on the website a statement that one of his senior officials was going to assassinate him was the politics of the madhouse.

The fact is that even this was a lie concoted by Griffin to hide the truth, that there had been a falling out amongst thieves in the party.

The fact that the police have announced that there will be no charges against Collett for his 'assassination plans' proves the veracity of Griffins statement about the affair.

The fact is that as anyone who knows Collett knows, the only danger Collett represents is to himself.

If he had ever acquired a loaded firearm the only thing at risk would have been his own foot.

My Resignation Letter From the BNP

Formal Resignation Letter.

10th August 2010.


Just over a month ago I won a court case for the BNP against Greenwich Council that not only changed the entire basis of electoral law in England, it also saved the party around ten to fifteen thousand pounds in legal costs and damages.

The legal arguments I drafted up and sent to the court ensured that the BNP won the court case.

For those idiots who will seek to attack me on the grounds of me being a red / traitor / unqualified crank (tick the usual pejorative as applicable) I mention this legal case I won for the party so as to ensure that decent people, and not the idiot sock puppets we see on the VNN Forum and Green Arrow site who are the vermin in the gutter of British Nationalism, understand that until yesterday when news of the mass suspension of party activists and organisers was announced I was still a loyal officer and supporter of the party.

I have pleaded with people to put the interests of the party first and before their own personal animosities and feuds.

As this has been ignored I have no choice but to take this action.

Over the last few years since the arrival of Jim Dowson into the party, Nick Griffin and Jim Dowson have repeatedly chosen to break the most obvious of laws including such debacles as ;

1) The Marmite Case

2) The unlawful use of stock images from a photoshop company during the European Elections

3) The EHRC court cases

4) The unlawful sacking of Michaele Mackenzie

5) The illegal suspension of Peter Mullins and many others


All of these were done under the orders of both Nick Griffin and Jim Dowson.

Regardless of how much income the party has had over the last few years, hundreds of thousands of pounds have been squandered on avoidable court cases.

Whilst party income has undoubtedly rose since Jim Dowson became involved with the BNP, so has the vast amount of money paid out by the BNP in legal costs incurred by the BNP.

Legal issues that were once dealt with internally within the party have been ’outsourced’ from the party to individuals paid by Jim Dowson and Nick Griffin, resulting in the parties internal legal affairs no longer being scrutinised or run by the BNP Legal Unit.

This ‘outsourcing’ of legal issues and cases, such as the drafting up of the new BNP constitution and dealing with the Marmite Case, have resulted in the party wasting hundreds of thousands of pounds on fighting legal cases that could have been avoided, had the party debated and addressed those legal issues internally.

What was particularly galling for me was the Michaela Mackenzie case.

I informed Nick Griffin on the day he sacked her that what he was doing was unlawful.

Not only did he ignore my advice, he later went to an Employment Tribunal and called me a ‘crank’ as a way to ‘explain’ why my advice to him was ignored.

The actions of Nick Griffin in this case alone has cost the party over twenty five thousand pounds, and as of Friday last week the money owed to Michaele Mackenzie has still not been paid.

This means the party will now be dragged back into court and probably bankrupted as a result.

As far as I am aware the party is now technically insolvent.

Outstanding court costs, wages bills, election expenses and also forthcoming legal cases against the party mean the BNP is now technically bankrupt.

As far as I am aware donations to the party have flowed to a trickle as well as party renewals and new inquiries.

This means the party should be avoiding creating new legal cases and liabilities, not rushing into them as though the party is awash with money to fight such legal cases.

Bankruptcy of the party will have very serious implications for the BNP membership.

If the party is made bankrupt then the BNP membership as a whole will be directly financially liable for its outstanding debts as an unincorporated association and not Nick Griffin or Jim Dowson.

This is because Nick Griffin has no assets and Jim Dowsons financial assets are probably hidden away in some Spanish or Swiss bank account outside the UK.

In relation to the illegal suspension of Peter Mullins and others, I spent months trying to get Nick to see sense on this issue.

It was only after months of arguments that Nick Griffin was forced to relent, drop their suspensions and re-admit them.

During this time I was threatened by Jim Dowson with violence for putting the parties legal interests first as he was the person pushing Nick Griffin to expel Peter Mullins and others.

I am not the only BNP member or BNP officer to have been threatened with violence by Jim Dowson.

It appears that when Jim Dowson doesn’t get what he wants he likes to threaten people with his connections to loyalist killers and terrorists in Northern Ireland in order to intimidate people into doing his bidding.

My complaints to Nick Griffin about Jim Dowsons threats of violence directed at me and other party members have been ignored.

All I can say is that Peter Mullins is a decent, honourable man whilst Jim Dowson is a convicted criminal, with links to Loyalist terrorism and terrorists with a string of failed companies to his name who bought his ’reverend’ title off of the internet.

These facts are easily ascertained off the internet, as the media have undertaken investigations into Jim Dowson and published this information widely.

Unfortunately, as the Peter Mullins case revealed, Nick Griffin thinks the law as regards the unlawful expulsion of members does not apply to him, even though he was shown by the courts during the John Tyndall case that the law does apply to the BNP.

The decision yesterday to unlawfully suspend dozens of activists simply for them standing against Nick Griffin in the leadership contest is the action of utterly irresponsible incompetents.

Nick Griffin knew before the leadership challenge even began that he could not be removed as leader of the party.

The BNP constitution was re-written specifically to ensure that no-one can ever remove Nick Griffin from his role as chairman.

Therefore to suspend the people who supported the leadership challenge is both unlawful and tactically inept.

The people who supported Eddy Butler would have been facing the choice of either knuckling down or resigning from the party.

Instead they have been unlawfully suspended and therefore can now launch new legal actions against the party.

The law is clear.

BNP members have a constitutionally protected right to stand for party leadership.

To suspend them for doing so is unlawful.

The way they have been suspended is also unlawful.

I have no doubt that they will now unite to form a class action against the party thereby incurring more legal costs and damages against an already virtually bankrupt party whose debts far outweigh its income.

The tragedy is that Andrew Brons has been dragged into this idiotic affair, for he will have no choice but to do as Nick Griffin and Jim Dowson say and declare that the leadership challengers did not get enough nominations and so cannot stand against Nick Griffin for a leadership election.

But what has most sickened me over recent weeks is the way that the serious allegations of sexual assault from the BNP member Shelley Rose have been ignored by Nick Griffin.

I have never met Shelley Rose, nor have I ever spoken to her.

I do not know the truth or otherwise of the allegations she has made.

As soon as I saw the Youtube video of her allegations I sent an e mail to Nick Griffin, and spoke to him on the phone, asking that in order to ensure the party and its public image is protected that both Shelley Rose and Jim Dowson be suspended as members and as party officers and that a full and transparent investigation is initiated.

The BNP cannot ever be seen as a party that protects perverts or a party that refuses to address allegations of such a serious nature from a female member.

Any allegations of sexual assault by any female BNP member against any male BNP member must be treated with the utmost seriousness and an full investigation begun.

Failure to do that allows the media to attack and undermine the party and its public image.

Jim Dowson is not a member of the BNP, so therefore in order to demonstrate that the party was taking these allegations seriously then he should have been immediately suspended as a party officer and from all party offices until the investigation and disciplinary procedures into the allegations were finished.

If Shelley Rose was found to have lied then she should have been expelled.

If Jim Dowson was found guilty of bringing the party into disrepute, Gross Misconduct and sexual assault then he should have been dismissed and sacked from all party offices he holds.

Instead what has happened is that Shelley Rose has been suspended, no investigation has been initiated and no sanction applied against Jim Dowson.

Instead of having a transparent investigation into the allegations, the internet attack dogs on sites like the Green Arrow website and the VNN Forum have been set upon Shelley Rose and abused her name and reputation.

They have slandered, threatened and vilified her and by so doing have disgraced not just the BNP but British Nationalism as a political movement.

This is intolerable.

The BNP cannot be seen as a political party that punishes the victim of a sexual assault whilst protecting the perpetrator of the crime.

All such allegations have to be treated with the utmost seriousness.

All such allegations must be investigated.

The issue is simple enough to understand.

Any married BNP party officer in a senior position who spends the night in a hotel room with a BNP female member other than his wife must be sacked.

This must be done for one simple reason.

A party officer lured into a secret affair opens himself up to being blackmailed or manipulated.

Such a scenario creates a fundamental conflict of interest between their personal life, their professional duties and their political responsibilities that is simply unacceptable.

A party officer who is in charge of the BNP finances via its income, who controls the BNP membership lists and who has such influence over the chairman of the party must be entirely above reproach at all times.

If it had been someone working for MI5 who had lured Jim Dowson into a sexual assignation in a London hotel room and then filmed him with hidden cameras and used that film to blackmail him, then MI5 would now be in control of the BNP’s finances and income and have access to all our membership data bases and be able to virtually control the party.

And we would never know about it.

Any married man foolish enough to have been discovered having stayed the night in a hotel room with a young woman other than his wife, and especially a ’reverend’, is an individual who may also have done so in the past and therefore is not suitable to be in that position.

In the world of business, and in the education system and police, any senior manager who has an affair with a junior member of his staff that threatens the good name of the organisation is guilty of Gross Misconduct and dismissed.

Whilst it may be acceptable for the Tories, Lib Dems and New Labour to act in such a manner it is not acceptable for senior officers of the BNP to do so, especially senior officers in charge of BNP finances and income and the membership data base.

But it appears that Jim Dowson is an ’untouchable’ in the party and that whilst Nick Griffin is prepared to sacrifice dozens of loyal members with decades of party loyalty, he will not deal with Jim Dowson.

It therefore appears that Nick Griffin no longer wishes to receive any counsel from anyone who wishes to put the legal interests of the BNP, its members, our public image and our future electoral expansion before the interests of Nick Griffin and Jim Dowson.

I cannot remain as the Legal Officer of a party that acts unlawfully towards its own members, that rewards years of party loyalty with unlawful suspensions and expulsions, that covers up serious allegations of sexual abuse by senior officers, that expels long standing members who ask for financial transparency within the party and that refuses to act to protect its own officers when they are threatened with violence by other senior officers.

Such a political party cannot be trusted with political power in our society.

If I stay on within such a party then it will appear as though I am supporting and condoning such actions.

Unless the BNP begins ;

1) An immediate fully transparent investigation into the ongoing allegations of financial mismanagement within the party which allows BNP members and officers to ascertain exactly what the party finances are, where party assets have gone and what the background behind the legal costs of recent legal cases have been. This is required in order to ensure that internal party mechanisms are in place to protect the party from such legal liabilities and allegations of financial impropriety in the future.

2) An immediate and fully transparent investigation into the threats of violence made against any party members and officers by Jim Dowson.

3) An immediate and fully transparent investigation into the allegations made by the BNP member Shelly Rose against Jim Dowson.

4) An immediate and fully transparent investigation into who authorised the unlawful suspensions of BNP party members Peter Mullins and others and also whether the present suspensions of members and organisers suspended for being involved in the leadership challenge are also legal. As part of the inquiry it must establish whether an independent body within the party should be established that vets and checks any orders for the suspension of members and officers of the party issued by the chairman or other officers are legal before the suspensions or expulsions are authorised and issued. This is required to protect the party from potential legal liabilities.

5) The establishment of an internal ‘BNP Reconciliation Committee’ which allows all BNP members and officers to air their grievances and discuss issues of concern to officers and the membership without fear of suspension and expulsion so as to allow us to move forward as a united party.

6) An immediate party inquiry into how the party can establish an internal mechanism for protecting the employment rights of party officers from arbitrary dismissal so as to ensure no more legal cases and legal costs are imposed against the party.

7) An immediate party inquiry into establishing an internal party mechanism that requires the chairman of the party to discuss and debate with senior officials of the party any financial or business actions that may impinge or impact upon the party directly or accrue legal or financial liabilities for the party before those decisions are taken.

8) Jim Dowson now controls the BNP membership database, the BNP donor database, the BNP treasury department, the BNP subscriptions operation, the BNP media & communications operation and the BNP website. This is completely unacceptable and legally questionable. There is no power in the constitution for the chairman to devolve such internal party offices or party operations to an individual who is not a party member. The BNP constitution does not give the chairman the power to allow a non-member of the party to hold, have access too or have power directly over BNP party finances or confidential information relating to party members. Nor does the chairman have any power to move party assets owned by the party outside the party and especially into the hands of an individual who is not a member of the party. Therefore all financial assets owned by the party and under the control of Jim Dowson must be declared and returned to the party. No officer of the party, either member of non-member, should be ever again be allowed to have such internal control and influence over such a vast amount of essential internal BNP operations now or in the future. Such over centralisation of power around Nick Griffin and Jim Dowson means the party is now vulnerable.

If party assets have been moved out of the party and into companies owned by Jim Dowson by Nick Griffin then this is potentially defined as "Fraud by abuse of position" and is defined by Section 4 of the Fraud Act 2006. This is such a case where a person occupies a position where they are expected to safeguard the financial interests of another person such as BNP members, and abuses that position; this includes cases where the abuse consisted of an omission rather than an overt act.

In such cases of potential fraud, it requires that for an offence to have occurred, the person must have acted dishonestly, and that they had to have acted with the intent of making a gain for themselves or anyone else, or inflicting a loss (or a risk of loss) on another. The fact that such issues may have potentially arisen means the party is at serious risk of investigation and prosecution.


I do not believe the list of assurances that I believe the party requires in order to allow it to move forward as a united organisation will be given by Nick Griffin.

In all good conscience I can therefore no longer remain as an officer of the party.

If I stay on as an officer of the party then I will be seen as condoning the above issues and problems.

I am not prepared to do that.

I hereby quit my role as BNP Legal Adviser with immediate effect.


L. J. Barnes LLB (Hons)