Hail Emperor Anthony Blair the First of the European Empire

Image - The first official statue of Emperor Anthony The First. Note the little child tugging at the hem of his skirts - this is symbolic of what democracy will be in the European Empire under the reign of the Emperors.






The announcement by Rupert Murdoch that The Scum (sorry The Sun) will now be supporting the Conservatives has been known for a long time.

Murdoch has got what he wanted from New Labour, which was the deregulation of the British media to allow him to build up his media propaganda empire to strangle democracy, and also his acolyte Tony blair will in the next few weeks be crowned as the President of the European Union - or as he will be known after his coronation "Emperor Anthony the First of the European Empire".


Hail Emperor Anthony The First, Emperor of the European Empire !


No doubt statues of the new Emperor will soon be erected in the backwaters and provinces of the empire, like Britain.

This was Murdochs plan all along - to get his puppet Tony Blair to run the Labour Party, turn Labour into Zanu New Labour, dump New Labour and then get Emperor Anthony put in place.

This means Murdoch now controls not just Britain via the Tory Party, who are so desperate for power they would line up and fight for the privelige of licking the salty sweat off of Murdochs antipodean Zionist ball sack if he asked them too, but he will also control the European Union via Emperor Anthony.

Behind the two thrones whispers the same worm tongue.

This is why The Times has started to print story after story attacking the BNP.

The Times knows that in order to stop the Right Wing of the Tory Party switching their vote to the BNP or UKIP that they have attack those parties.

UKIP is undergoing its usual implosion with the announcement of the resignation of party leader Nigel Farage, who will no doubt be enjoying the benefits of his secret deal with David Cameron undertaken during a secret meeting between the two of them in Devon last year when Cameron was on holiday down there, whilst UKIP will descend into another paroxsym of infighting over the post that will ensure it doesnt become a real problem during the lead up to the May 2010 general election.

So we can see that both the Left Wing Liberal corporate media, The Guardian, will attack the BNP in order to bolster the Labour vote at the same time the Murdoch owned Corporate Media will attack the BNP to bolster the Conservative vote.

Some of the stories in the Times over recent days have been a joke.

The 'scandal' of the BNP funding charities for wounded soldiers can be compared to the Tories who in government, and as directors of British arms companies such as Baroness Neville-Jones, the Conservative Shadow Security Minister, have been involved in arming tyrant for decades.

Remember the gas attack on the Kurds in Iraq under Saddam Hussein - yep, the tories allowed a British company to build the chemical weapons plant that produced the nerve gas, even though the Thatcher government knew the chemical weapons plant was going to be used to make chemical weapons.

The Bomber Baroness Neville-Jones, who profited from the Iraq War, is willing to work for an arms company killing Muslims, but then pontificates about the ‘violent lyrics’ of records. Perhaps she shoud worry more about the bombs and guns she sold to the tyrants of the world first.

She was non-executive chairman of QinetiQ, the part Government-owned UK/US defence company from 2002 to 2005 and her directorship of a firm which engaged in the arms trade with Iraq whilst at the same time wielding indirect executive power over the BBC’s coverage of the war in Iraq led some to question her objectivity.

The Baroness sat as a governor of the BBC which peddled the bogus WMD propaganda to the public that got us into the war, she also sat as chairman on the British Joint Intelligence Committee which provided much of the bogus information in the dodgy dossier at the same time she was also a director of the arms company that had supplied Saddam Hussien with his weapons and which would profit from increased arms sales when British troops returned to Iraq to remove the weapons her company had sold him.

How sick is that.

And this duplicious evil woman is the Tory Shadow Security Minister.

War propagandist, peddler of lies to bolster the case for war and profiteer from the war itself.

"Vote Tory for More Wars !", is the slogan now, seeing as Murdoch wants the Zionist Tories in power in preperation for an attack on Iran. Those pesky peaceniks and Dhimmi-liberals in the margins of the Labour Party must make way for the 'War Whores' of the Tory Party, who will support WW3 with as much conviction as a whore can muster.

There are few in this country with as much blood on their hands as the Labour Party and Tory party who voted for the Iraq war, except of course for the myriad war criminals given asylum in the UK over recent years by New Labour.

Yet again the tories can be seen to have supplied the weapons that have killed and disabled British soldiers in the Iraq War and yet the Tory media are attacking the BNP for trying to help the wounded soldiers who the Tories, their officials and their financial backers betrayed.

Expect to see more of this facile propaganda against the BNP as the election looms.

The more the Murdoch media attack the BNP, the more they will do so to hide the crimes and duplicity of the Tories, who Murdoch also owns.

Afghanistan - A war for Gas and Oil Pipelines

Image - US army bases in Afghanistan




Image - Oil and Gas pipeline routes



Image - oil and gas pipe line routes through Afghanistan





Is there anything dumber than a journalist who writes for the Times.


Take Bronwen Maddox and her article here ;

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/bronwen_maddox/article6739302.ece

Usually when a journalist idiot wants us to become entangled in another war / social work action using the British army / policing role / Oil Imperialism escapade then they either use the usual 'Think of the children' routine or now the 'what about the women' routine.

I cannot believe that such people are allowed to write for The Times, unless the Times is still 'seeding public opinion with lies' as Carol Quigley stated in his books was its main role.

We are not in Afghanistan for any of the following reasons ;

1) Helping the children
2) Helping the women
3) Stopping the heroin
4) Fighting terrorism
5) Stopping terrorism in the UK

It is total hypocrisy to say the UK and US are in Afghanistan to 'fight islamic extremism and Al Qaeda' when Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and the Taliban were all creations of the CIA during the Afghan War against the Russians.

The US created the Taliban and sponsored its growth, long enough for it to grow to such a size that it then gave the US the opportunity to invade Afghanistan and take control of the country under the pretext of 'fighting Islamic terrorism'.

If it wasnt for the US there would be no Islamic extremists undertaking terrorism - as the US built up those terrorist groups, funded and armed them.

There is in fact two reasons why we are in Afghanistan, and why British soldiers are dying, and that is for ;

1) Oil

2) Gas

This war was started in 1999 with the passing of the Silk Road Strategy Act in the US.

Note the contents of the act here ;

http://www.eurasianet.org/resource/regional/silkroad.html

Note section 6 of the act ;

(6) The region of the South Caucasus and Central Asia could produce oil and gas in sufficient quantities to reduce the dependence of the United States on energy from the volatile Persian Gulf region.

and further ;

`(c) ACTIVITIES SUPPORTED- Activities that may be supported by programs under subsection (b) include promoting actively the participation of United States companies and investors in the planning, financing, and construction of infrastructure for communications, transportation, including air transportation, and energy and trade including highways, railroads, port facilities, shipping, banking, insurance, telecommunications networks, and gas and oil pipelines.


The act was revised in 2006 to include the energy interests of the US as one of the primary reasons for the US to be in Afghanistan - note no reference to Osama Bin Laden or Al Qaeda ;

http://www.theorator.com/bills109/s2749.html


(b) Findings- Congress makes the following findings:

(3) The liberation of Afghanistan from Taliban misrule and the new course in Afghanistan toward political and economic openness make possible the country's reintegration into Central Asia.

(4) The ouster of the Taliban from Afghanistan has diminished threats to that country's neighbors in Central Asia, allowing for accelerated progress toward democracy, open economies, and the rule of law across the region. Afghanistan's embrace of popular sovereignty and political pluralism demonstrates the universal applicability of these values.

(5) The Governments of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan, which have contributed to United States military deployments in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Kosovo, are key United States partners in diversification of energy sources and transportation routes, enhancing and contributing to United States energy and security interests.

(6) In recognition of global and regional threats to stability, prosperity, and democracy in Afghanistan, including terrorism, political-religious extremism, and production and trafficking of narcotics, and in recognition of Afghanistan's geographic location and cultural and historical identity, Afghanistan should be considered to be among the countries of Central Asia, and not separate from them.

(7) In recognition of security cooperation from the Government of Kazakhstan, including deployment of the Kazakhstan contingent in Iraq, progress toward a market economy, United States business participation in energy and infrastructure development in Kazakhstan, and an ongoing Government of Kazakhstan policy of ethnic and religious tolerance, a relationship with Kazakhstan is of high importance to the United States. "


The maps above show you the proposed Oil pipe line and gas pipe line planned for Afghanistan - The Eurasian Corridor.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Afghanistan_Pipeline


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/2608713.stm

An agreement has been signed in the Turkmen capital, Ashgabat, paving the way for construction of a gas pipeline from the Central Asian republic through Afghanistan to Pakistan.



The Global research Group states that ;

The Eurasian Corridor

Since the 2001 invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, the US has a military presence on China's Western frontier, in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The U.S. is intent upon establishing permanent military bases in Afghanistan, which occupies a strategic position bordering on the former Soviet republics, China and Iran.

Moreover, the US and NATO have also established since 1996, military ties with several former Soviet republics under GUUAM (Georgia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan and Moldava). In the post 9/11 era, Washington has used the pretext of the "global war against terrorism" to further develop a U.S. military presence in GUUAM countries. Uzbekistan withdrew from GUUAM in 2002.(The organization is now referred to as GUAM).

China has oil interests in Eurasia as well as in sub-Saharan Africa, which encroach upon Anglo-American oil interests.

What is at stake is the geopolitical control over the Eurasian corridor.

In March 1999, the U.S. Congress adopted the Silk Road Strategy Act, which defined America’s broad economic and strategic interests in a region extending from the Eastern Mediterranean to Central Asia. The Silk Road Strategy (SRS) outlines a framework for the development of America’s business empire along an extensive geographical corridor.

The successful implementation of the SRS requires the concurrent "militarization" of the entire Eurasian corridor as a means to securing control over extensive oil and gas reserves, as well as "protecting" pipeline routes and trading corridors. This militarization is largely directed against China, Russia and Iran.

Take a look at the maps above - then note how the army bases are in prime positions to protect the oil and gas pipelines.

That is what this 'war' is about.

The Afghanistan war is about securing the territory through which the oil and gas pipelines will have to pass through in order to ensure Russia, China and Iran are outmanouvered in the last great wars for the last of the global oil supplies on the planet.

Only yesterday the Independent reported that the Peak Oil process is even close than the 'experts' have been so far admitting.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/warning-oil-supplies-are-running-out-fast-1766585.html

The world is heading for a catastrophic energy crunch that could cripple a global economic recovery because most of the major oil fields in the world have passed their peak production, a leading energy economist has warned.


Higher oil prices brought on by a rapid increase in demand and a stagnation, or even decline, in supply could blow any recovery off course, said Dr Fatih Birol, the chief economist at the respected International Energy Agency (IEA) in Paris, which is charged with the task of assessing future energy supplies by OECD countries.



This is what the Iraq War and Afghanistan War are about.

This is also why China is exporting millions of its people into Africa in order to colonise the African continent as Lebensraum for the Chinese state - and to steal its oil and resources from the indigenous African people.


British troops are being slaughtered in Afghanistan for gas and oil pipelines.

That is the truth behind the lies the government spin.

They lied to get us into Iraq and they are lieing now about why we went into Afghanistan.

The Taliban are not Al Qaeda.

The Taliban are mainly local Afghans who do not want to be occupied by any invading army, local Afghan nationalists resisting occupation, ISI pakistani agents fighting a proxy war against the US, drug smugglers and opium growers protecting their drug territories, foreign jihadists working with the pakistani ISI and the angry relatives of Afghans killed by coalition forces getting revenge.

The Taliban are not a threat to us - the fact we are over there means Islamists will attack us over there and over here.

We must withdraw our troops from Afghanistan, return them to the UK and deploy them at British ports in order to seal our own national borders and assist in the removal of all illegal immigrants from the UK, we must deport all islamist supporters from the UK, execute all convicted islamist terrorists in the UK, deport all those that fund, support and assist Islamist terrorism in the UK - and most important of all create a 100 % national energy production system that means we do not have to depend on any imports of energy from the Middle East oil, Russian gas or Eurasian oil and gas supplies.

We are at risk of being attacked here in Britain, because we are over there in Islamic nations stealing their gas and oil, or stealing their land to allow us to pump the gas and oil of other nations into our nations.