Hail Emperor Anthony Blair the First of the European Empire

Image - The first official statue of Emperor Anthony The First. Note the little child tugging at the hem of his skirts - this is symbolic of what democracy will be in the European Empire under the reign of the Emperors.






The announcement by Rupert Murdoch that The Scum (sorry The Sun) will now be supporting the Conservatives has been known for a long time.

Murdoch has got what he wanted from New Labour, which was the deregulation of the British media to allow him to build up his media propaganda empire to strangle democracy, and also his acolyte Tony blair will in the next few weeks be crowned as the President of the European Union - or as he will be known after his coronation "Emperor Anthony the First of the European Empire".


Hail Emperor Anthony The First, Emperor of the European Empire !


No doubt statues of the new Emperor will soon be erected in the backwaters and provinces of the empire, like Britain.

This was Murdochs plan all along - to get his puppet Tony Blair to run the Labour Party, turn Labour into Zanu New Labour, dump New Labour and then get Emperor Anthony put in place.

This means Murdoch now controls not just Britain via the Tory Party, who are so desperate for power they would line up and fight for the privelige of licking the salty sweat off of Murdochs antipodean Zionist ball sack if he asked them too, but he will also control the European Union via Emperor Anthony.

Behind the two thrones whispers the same worm tongue.

This is why The Times has started to print story after story attacking the BNP.

The Times knows that in order to stop the Right Wing of the Tory Party switching their vote to the BNP or UKIP that they have attack those parties.

UKIP is undergoing its usual implosion with the announcement of the resignation of party leader Nigel Farage, who will no doubt be enjoying the benefits of his secret deal with David Cameron undertaken during a secret meeting between the two of them in Devon last year when Cameron was on holiday down there, whilst UKIP will descend into another paroxsym of infighting over the post that will ensure it doesnt become a real problem during the lead up to the May 2010 general election.

So we can see that both the Left Wing Liberal corporate media, The Guardian, will attack the BNP in order to bolster the Labour vote at the same time the Murdoch owned Corporate Media will attack the BNP to bolster the Conservative vote.

Some of the stories in the Times over recent days have been a joke.

The 'scandal' of the BNP funding charities for wounded soldiers can be compared to the Tories who in government, and as directors of British arms companies such as Baroness Neville-Jones, the Conservative Shadow Security Minister, have been involved in arming tyrant for decades.

Remember the gas attack on the Kurds in Iraq under Saddam Hussein - yep, the tories allowed a British company to build the chemical weapons plant that produced the nerve gas, even though the Thatcher government knew the chemical weapons plant was going to be used to make chemical weapons.

The Bomber Baroness Neville-Jones, who profited from the Iraq War, is willing to work for an arms company killing Muslims, but then pontificates about the ‘violent lyrics’ of records. Perhaps she shoud worry more about the bombs and guns she sold to the tyrants of the world first.

She was non-executive chairman of QinetiQ, the part Government-owned UK/US defence company from 2002 to 2005 and her directorship of a firm which engaged in the arms trade with Iraq whilst at the same time wielding indirect executive power over the BBC’s coverage of the war in Iraq led some to question her objectivity.

The Baroness sat as a governor of the BBC which peddled the bogus WMD propaganda to the public that got us into the war, she also sat as chairman on the British Joint Intelligence Committee which provided much of the bogus information in the dodgy dossier at the same time she was also a director of the arms company that had supplied Saddam Hussien with his weapons and which would profit from increased arms sales when British troops returned to Iraq to remove the weapons her company had sold him.

How sick is that.

And this duplicious evil woman is the Tory Shadow Security Minister.

War propagandist, peddler of lies to bolster the case for war and profiteer from the war itself.

"Vote Tory for More Wars !", is the slogan now, seeing as Murdoch wants the Zionist Tories in power in preperation for an attack on Iran. Those pesky peaceniks and Dhimmi-liberals in the margins of the Labour Party must make way for the 'War Whores' of the Tory Party, who will support WW3 with as much conviction as a whore can muster.

There are few in this country with as much blood on their hands as the Labour Party and Tory party who voted for the Iraq war, except of course for the myriad war criminals given asylum in the UK over recent years by New Labour.

Yet again the tories can be seen to have supplied the weapons that have killed and disabled British soldiers in the Iraq War and yet the Tory media are attacking the BNP for trying to help the wounded soldiers who the Tories, their officials and their financial backers betrayed.

Expect to see more of this facile propaganda against the BNP as the election looms.

The more the Murdoch media attack the BNP, the more they will do so to hide the crimes and duplicity of the Tories, who Murdoch also owns.

Andy McNab and the BNP

It is never good publicity to be attacked by a bona fide war hero.

Coming from a family with many members who served in World War 2 such as my uncles Jessie and Lloyd Holmes, twin brothers, who were captured at the Fall of Singapore February 15th 1942 and who were held in various concentration camps and death camps including at Selarang Barracks near Changi Prison and also an uncle who fought in Burma, I have seen the toll that war wears into men.

My great uncle Lloyd died six months after returning home to Britain at the end of the war due to the mental and physical torture inflicted upon him by the Japanese guards and his ordeal.

I stood alongside men like him a few years ago when the Japanese Emperor paraded down the Mall in London, where I turned my back on him as a sign of protest for the lack of a full apology from the Japanese monarchy in whose name the cruelty was undertaken. A tiny act of thanks to men like my uncles for such a massive sacrifice.

My grandfather was in the Royal Navy, torpedoed twice and survived and then was wounded in a convoy in the pacific by a Japanese Kamikaze attack and then spent months in Baltimore being treated for his injuries, including the loss of an eye, two fingers and a severe wound in the chest.

My Great uncle, my Grandmothers brother, was in Burma and fought alongside the Gurkhas. His wife used to find him standing in the kitchen in the dark in the middle of the night washing himself down in the sink. She knew not to ask. He was washing the blood from his hands and face and arms whose presence forever haunted him, the blood that had squirted out as he cut the throats of Japanese soldiers in the dark. That was Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder before it was given a name.

I have never fought in a war. I have never been in the armed services, but coming from a family where every generation, except my father and I, had served in the military I have been taught to respect the military and military personnel.

Friends of mine are presently fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Lads I know half my age are training to go right now.

BNP members serve, and have served in both wars, and in every war where veterans are still alive. A chap I knew in the BNP served as a Lancaster Bomber squadron leader.

In fact, the BNP probably contains more ex-servicemen than most other political parties in relation to proportion of membership.

Therefore the words of Andy McNabb are particularly stinging ;

" Andy McNab has told the BNP, “give me my books back”.

The ultimatum comes after Nick Griffin announced that signed copies of Brute Force and Seven Troop would be auctioned to raise money for Help for Heroes.

McNab – ex-SAS hardman, Gulf War veteran and best-selling author – told Nothing British, “When someone called me to say that the BNP was using one of my books in a publicity stunt, I was sick to the stomach. I served with men of all colours and from many nationalities. They were all equal to me. That’s what the army teaches you. Nick Griffin thinks differently. He thinks the British Army should be for whites-only. He thinks heroes like Johnson Beharry, our only living VC, should be sent back to Grenada.

“He doesn’t understand that what makes the British Army great, and what makes this country great. It’s the way we draw together people from all around the world and give them ideals worth believing in: tolerance, fairness, decency, looking out for the little guy. It’s the British way of doing things. That’s why I’ve asked for my books back. Because I don’t want anything to help the BNP promote their poisonous politics of segregation and hatred.”

Harsh words indeed, and coming from a man like Andy McNab they carry great weight, and therefore they must be responded too.

First all lets deal with the issue of the books.

I suggest the BNP still raffle the books and the money donated and raised go straight to the Help For Heroes charity. Then Andy McNab, a succesful author, should be offered a chance to match the figure of money raised by BNP donations and procure the books from the BNP member who wins the raffle and that Andy McNab then donates his money straight to the Help For Heroes charity thereby ensuring they get his money as well as the money raised by the raffle.

That way Andy McNab gets his book back, the charity gains from the money raised by the BNP raffle and the charity also has the bonus of the money from Andy McNab also coming into its coffers.

I am sure Mr. McNab would agree to such a plan, seeing as he gets his books back and the charity doubles its money.

A few thousand pounds is nothing to a successful author like Mr. McNab and as the charity assists the rehabilitation of wounded soldiers, this is something that Mr. McNab would obviously wish to support.

In relation to the issues raised by Mr. McNab, well I cant speak for Nick Griffin but I can tell him what I believe the BNP stands for as regards the British military.

Under a BNP government there would be no British soldiers dying in Iraq and Afghanistan.

There would be no young British men and women returning home blinded, limbless and maimed.

This because we would not have sent them to fight a war for oil in Iraq and oil pipelines in Afghanistan.

The national security we wish to maintain and secure is based within the home front, and has no part in the oil imperialism of the US, UK and the global oil corporations.

Therefore the same men and women that Andy McNab would have served alongside would not be dying today. They would be home with their families, where they belong.

Andy McNab served alongside brave men of all races who wore uniform of the Britain. All who volunteer to serve our nation deserve honour. Yet it is the Labour government with the blessing of the Tories that sent them to war without the right kit, with sub standard equipment, and then when they returned abandoned many of them to homelessness whilst going to court to cut from other wounded soldiers their disability payments.

It is the Labour government that stopped the Gurkhas coming into the UK, not the BNP.

Those of all nationalities who volunteer for service deserve our respect, but these men are volunteers who signed onto the British military knowing that they would not be offered citizenship in the UK. That is the way it has always been and the way it is right now. The foreign recruits in the military are not offered a ' French Foreign Legion deal' where they are given British citizenship after a period of contractual military service - it is a job, and that’s it.

If service in the British army equated to a right to citizenship and to live in Britain then this would be an absurdity.

It does not, and it never has.

Whilst in the British army each man of every nation demands equal respect, and it could be no other way. Without such discipline and efficiency then a modern, functional army could not exist or operate.

The BNP does not think the army should be 'whites only' - the BNP believes that as much as possible the British army should rely on well trained British troops with British citizenship. The numbers of foreign troops allowed in the British army is pegged at 10 % of the total, though we believe this should be reduced. A British Army that fights around the world requires troops from around the world, a British Army that defends the home front needs no foreign volunteers other than regiments such as the Gurkhas.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article589974.ece

As quoted in the above Times article, “ “It is after all supposed to be the British Army, not the Commonwealth Army,” one defence source said. “

As the BNP is anti-globalist, then our global military role must be replaced by a national defence role. The era where British politicians in the cosy confines of the Houses of Commons send British troops to die in foreign wars will be over when the BNP gets into power. No more Wars for Oil disguised as ‘Moral Imperialism’.


In fact nations such as South Africa are proposing new laws that will effectively strip citizenship rights from South African volunteers to the British Army, and therefore we must start to recruit more British troops into the military and not rely on foreign volunteers simply in order to ensure ;

1) we do not have a choice because volunteer numbers from outside Britain will drop when such laws are enacted.

2) the future emphasis of the British military will be to defend the home front, and therefore a national based military force ensuring British national security will need to be created. The BNP do not intend this nation to get involved in any more globalist interventions in the guise of some inane moral principle of interventionism. Therefore less foreign troops will be required anyway.

http://www.afrika.no/Detailed/10790.html

Even the Gurkhas may be prohibited from joining the British Army in the near future as the Communist government of Nepal wishes to pass laws that prohibits Nepalese citizens joining foreign armies such as the British Army ;

http://beacononline.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/gurkhas-face-ban-from-british-army-report/

As for Johnson Beharry, he was a volunteer soldier from Grenada. His injuries require he remains in the UK for treatment and the BNP would never remove decorated war heroes such as him who deserve a home amongst us. He is loyal to Britain, so we are loyal to him.

There are millions of terrorists, foreign criminals, colonists, bogus asylum seekers, sex slavers, gun smugglers and gangsters in this country who we will deport when we get the chances - we will never deport men such as Johnson Beharry. To say we would is utter nonsense.

What makes the British Army great, and what makes this country great is when we all come together to benefit our nation.

But that doesnt mean we should forget the fact this is Britain and it is the British Army.

Andy Mcnab believes we should act as a 'moral beacon' for the world standing for 'tolerance, fairness, decency, looking out for the little guy'. Fine words, but meaningless in relation to military strategy and the demands of a 21st century British army. We can no longer draw people into the army from all around the world for the reasons explained above. The world has changed.

We need to look out for own people, our own country and our way of life. These are all under attack from colonists into this country who also use the rhetoric of liberalism as a way to remove the rights of the majority and replace them with the dictates of minorities. Such endless surrender of our liberties to liberalism and its cant must be resisted. Political correctness kills.

The idea that Britain should be perpetually 'looking out for the little guy' is how we got into bombing Serbia, Iraq and Afghanistan. This was the rhetoric of Tony Blair, with his agenda of 'moral warfare' that led us into those wars. The problem is such rhetoric eventually has to be backed up with bullets and bombs, and people die, both innocent civilians and British soldiers.

As the poet William Blake wrote, 'The road to hell is paved with good intentions'.

Regardless of whether we wish too or not, such rhetoric of moral interventionism has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in Iraq and hundreds of British troops and thousands of American dead.

The BNP believe that the price of such moral imperialism paid in the lives of British soldiers is too much.

We are not the worlds policeman or social worker.

Nor should we be the worlds arm dealer.

One of the reasons why Andy McNab was sent to fight in the first Iraq War was because the Tory government that sent him to war had also been secretly, along with the US, been arming Saddam Hussein.

http://www.cambridgeclarion.org/books/preface_leigh_1993.html

The same Conservative government that sent Andy McNab to war also prosecuted innocent men in the Matrix Churchill trial. The Conservative government put its own political interests before the interests of justice and were even prepared to send innocent men to jail ;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms-to-Iraq

Therefore the war that Mcnab fought in, and was tortured by Saddam Husseins henchmen, was based on Britain, and British arms companies, disarming a tyrant that it had been secretly arming and assisting for decades with British weapons.

British soldiers in Iraq were killed with British weapons sold to Saddam Hussein by British arms companies with the blessing of both Labour and Conservative governments.

To have a cheap shot at the BNP about the utterly irrelevant issue of ‘racism‘, whilst the war criminals and war profiteers that armed Saddam Hussein remain unpunished and still fund the Conservative Party coffers, is frankly perverse.

These examples of greed, criminality and profiteering are also the very ’ideals’ of those British politicians and political parties that Andy McNab supports and endorses - the sick, corrupt and criminal ideals of a political system and Establishment politicians motivated solely by the profit margin and never principles of morality. These are the values of the Labour Party and the Conservative Party that have misruled our nation for generations.

As for the 'Nothing British About the BNP' blog site - this site is run by Tim Montgomerie and James Bethell of ConservativeHome, two activists of the same party that once sold Saddm Hussein the weapons that killed your comrades.

Their party is a party of war profiteers and war criminals, you should be ashamed in aiding them. The Conservative Party voted for both the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, their hands are as bloody as Tony 'The Butcher' Blair and his lickspittle lackey Gordon Brown.

Andy, you can have your books back.

Just match the money made by the BNP raffle, donate it to the Hope for Heroes charity and they are yours.

Next time you want to know about the BNP just ask. The next time you want to write fiction, then put it in your books.

Karl Poppers Paradox and the BNP

My response to the article below is here - I wonder if they allow it !


Poppers Paradox comes up against the BNP Paradox ;

At what point does the so called ‘defence of tolerance’ tip into the point where the rhetoric of tolerance is used to disguise the fact that tolerance has itself become intolerance and has destroyed tolerance all together ?

Enoch Powell wrote that ‘ The new fascism will be anti-fascism’, and today it seems that the Liberal Fascists seek to depict their intolerance as a defence of tolerance.

The fact that the proposition that our socities are so unstable that a single stray soundbite from a ‘fascist’ politician may cause a fascist uprising is itself evidence of the fact that liberalism itself can only prevent fascism by becoming fascism.

When the liberal fascists adopt the methodology of fascism in order to prevent an fascist uprising whose existence in society has been caused by them ( the BNP have not been responsible for creating the conditions for fascism in our society - the liberals have as our liberal society is their creation ) then it is liberalism that is the fascism we should fear - for it has created the conditions for fascism whilst becoming fascist itself.

In reality the rhetoric that our society is so weak that fascism could arise because of free speech is a condemnation of liberalism itself - though of course liberal fascists would never admit that.




http://www.charliebeckett.org/?p=1805&cpage=1#comment-14177


The BNP, the media and Belgium: ethical lessons from the Continent (guest blog)

Throughout my career I have struggled to know how to handle the dilemma of reporting organised racism. I have a family background that makes me fear brushing extremism under the carpet. But I also know that the political racists need the oxygen of mainstream media attention to build their profile. My LSE colleague Bart Cammaerts has researched widely into political extremism and the media, but he also has personal experience of a country where racist politics is much more popular and embedded in the mainstream. What lessons can we learn from places like Belgium?

Mainstream Media and the Extreme Right. What to Do?

Dr Bart Cammaerts, LSE
Bart Cammaerts

Bart Cammaerts

The current controversy surrounding the invitation of the BBC of a BNP representative to appear on their flagship show Question Time deserves a more thorough debate then it is getting at the moment.

The central question of this debate should be how the media as an institution and journalists as media professionals deal with an extreme right, post-fascist party such as the BNP. In this regard, it might be fruitful to have a look across the channel, where extreme right parties have been a significant political force for decades now.

In Belgium for instance, Vlaams Blok, now called Vlaams Belang, has increased its share of the vote (and of representatives) every election from 1991 until 2007, reaching at its prime almost 25% of the popular vole in the North of Belgium and 33% in a medium-sized city like Antwerp.

Political Quarantine

The reaction of democratic political parties was to unequivocally and unanimously reject any co-operation with the extreme right, not even with the view of submitting amendments. All democratic parties signed a protocol to that effect. This came to be known as the ‘cordon sanitaire’, in effect placing the extreme right in a political quarantine.

Although at times under debate, the cordon sanitaire remains intact, 18 years after it was signed. The media’s position towards the extreme right, however, was - to say the least - much more complicated and became ever more problematic the larger the extreme right became.

Despite calls from some, a ‘cordon médiatique’ never materialized and the mainstream media, commercial as well as public, increasingly provided a platform for the populist discourses of hate and division propagated by the extreme right.

Journalists Responsibilities

It is of course over-simplifying matters a bit, but there were (and still are) two main positions with regard to the media’s treatment of the extreme right and they are to some extent linked to different paradigms in thinking about the role of journalists in a democracy.

The first school, very much embedded in the liberal tradition, claims objectivity and impartiality and argues that the extreme right should be treated as any other political party and therefore it deserves adequate attention and exposure in the media in the same degree as any other party that holds more then 20% of the vote. Democracy is not served by excluding the voice of (a significant) part of the electorate from the public space and the common sense and critical watchdog role of the journalist counter-balances their extremism.

The second school finds its origins in social responsibility approaches and public journalism. They refute that the media can ever be objective and impartial and point to the social construction of news, discourses and frames, to the way protest is being covered or to the exclusion of other (left-wing) radical ideas from the mainstream. It is being foregrounded that the most important role of a journalist is to be a citizen first and foremost, rather then a neutral observer and to thus defend democracy against its enemies.

Legitimized Discourses

From this perspective, other rules should apply towards extreme right parties and their ideology. It is also often argued that sharing a platform with the extreme right partly legitimizes their discourses.

The liberal arguments won the fight in North Belgium and representatives of the extreme right started appearing regularly on the news, news shows, in election programmes, etc. Granting the extreme right a platform to disseminate their ideology proved to be a very slippery slope towards presenting them as legitimate political actors being good at their job of opposing the government. More and more representatives of the extreme right have gone through the same media training as democratic politicians and are quite savvy in grasping every opportunity to get their often vile messages across, in spite of über-critical interviewers.

In fact, representatives of extreme right parties often perform a sort of permanent underdog anti-politics that appeals to anti-establishment sentiments - an establishment to which the (liberally inclined) media elites are also considered part of.

Suppressed Voices

There are problems with both positions. The liberal answer ultimately often results in granting the extreme right an open platform, thereby normalizing and partly legitimizing racism and racist discourses in society in the process. Excluding them from (mainstream) public space, however, cultivates the underdog position in which the extreme right revels so comfortably and above all adds ammunition to the repeated claims of the extreme right that liberal democracy is inherently anti-democratic as it excludes and suppresses certain voices and ideas. Ideas on racial superiority, segregation and holocaust denial being prime examples of this for the extreme right.

In effect, the extreme right has for many years used the formal rules (and language) of democracy against democracy itself. Claiming the freedom of speech and expression with a view of silencing others.

I believe that extreme right parties should not be ignored altogether and the societal tensions and conflicts they are the symptom of, even less so. But the media should expose extreme right parties for what they really are and lay barren internal conflicts (just as with other parties) rather then give such parties and their representatives a platform to repeat their discourses of hate and exclusion.

Reporting The Right

Journalists should furthermore be very aware of the dangers of legitimizing extreme right discourses when reporting on the extreme right and when interviewing their representatives.

Pluralism should be radical in a democracy, but for vibrant multi-cultural and ethnical democracies to be able to survive, a common ground relating to basic values such as equality, respect, solidarity, difference, etc. is crucial as well. Popper’s paradox of tolerance sums it up pretty neatly, up until what point can intolerance be tolerated before it destroys tolerance all together?






t

Uganda, Bishop Sentamu and typical Daily Mail Bollocks

The above is the Ugandan national flag.

Note the spears.

In fact the indigenous Ugandan tribespeoples are very proud of their history as hunters and warriors.

But unfortunately the Communist Bloc and the Soviet Union, the same people the UAF and the Labour Party supported during the Cold War, shipped in millions of AK47 machine guns into African nation states and has this led to the endless civil wars and tribal conflicts we have seen in Africa decade after decade, including in Uganda.



Image - Karimojong tribesmen of Uganda display their AK47 weapons sold to Africans by communists and socialists and that have destroyed Africa

( Link Here - http://www.chipspeace.org/projects )

If only the indigenous people of Uganda and the rest of Africa had been left to live with their traditional ancestral weapons such as simple spears then the country of Uganda and the African continent would be a far happier place than it is today.

And no doubt the many millions of them driven from their indigenous homelands would not be now living in the West claiming asylum.

That is the legacy of Communism, they supplied the weapons that drove the genocidal wars that have killed millions of black indigenous Africans and led to the immigration invasion in the West.

Church Of England to Ban BNP - Liberal Inquisition Begins

The pc church of england, which is now just another PC ridden pseudo-christian cult, is about to debate a motion to ban the BNP.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7838280.stm

This motion has been proposed by a Miss Miss Vasantha Gnanadoss (Southwark) who it appears is not an indigenous Briton, but of immigrant stock who also works for the Metropolitan Police as a solicitor - so she is one of the Race Relations Master Class.

That means as she is one of the Master Class she can be as racist as she wants against anyone with a white skin, such as BNP members, and also be able to restrict their rights as she wishes.

It appears that God makes all men equal, but the PC Church Of England has the power to demand that some men be treated and regarded not as human beings but as dehumanised subhumans who should form an underclass in our society with less civil rights than all other people in our society.

She has managed to get 167 signatures for her petty and vindictive motion here ;

http://www.cofe.anglican.org/about/gensynod/pmm/#parity


But note how many signatures that the motion for the 'uniqueness of Christ in Britain today' got - which was only 149 signatures whilst a motion to protect the financial interests of the widows of deceased clergy only got 43 signatures.

So the fucking idiots in the PC church of england are more interested in seeing the BNP banned from the church rather than ensuring the widows of deceased clergy can have a decent pension or whether Christ himself, and Christianity, is protected as the main faith of Great Britain.

The PC church of england is about to die.

It has become a nest of snakes spreading a false gospel, it is not a church anymore it is the throne of a fake cult of political correctness.

When it passes this motion the church will no longer represent Jesus or God but simply the State, and this makes it a false church.

Jesus forgives - the PC Church of England crucifies its own faithful.

The Church of Christ is open to all - the PC Church of England is open only to the devil and his disciples of political correctness.

Any Church enthroned or worshiped by the Politically Correct State is an enemy of Christ and the people.

The Liberal Inquisition of the PC Church of England begins. Soon the heretics will be exiled, excommunicated and thrown screaming into the bonfires of anti-racist hysteria as the elders of the Church confuse Marx for God and Che Guevara as Jesus.

Pickled Politics and the Mafia of the Mediocre

A few days ago I had the pleasure of being banned from the Pickled Politics site by the mafia of the mediocre, the moderators, that run the site.

This was after the site put up an article about Nick Griffin speaking at the Oxford Union, where they stated that though Nick and the BNP had a right to free speech that the BNP were a nasty, despicable organisation with nothing to say and that its ideas and views could be combated and torn apart as easily as a wet kleenex in the hands of a sobbing liberal.

http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/1551

The site says it stands for free speech and that the 'intellectuals' were ready to 'demolish' the arguments the BNP put forward.

BIG MISTAKE.

I trotted along their and began posting a few comments in response to the vapid and asinine comments being posted on the site by the regulars who post on the site. No problem for a while.

The arguments put forward by the people that post on the site were so pathetic that I wasnt sure at first if they were taking the piss.

They werent.

They really are that dumb.

For example one person called Morgoth wrote the following

" Therefore my question: do we possess the right to pursue conditions conducive to our survival?

Survival? Kelly Holmes (to take one example) is 100, no, a million times the Briton than Nick Griffen could ever hope to be. And the future of this country is assured with shining eggs like her about.

Lets have, as Rumbold (I think) said upthread, lots more inter-”racial” marriages - the sooner a shitty little inconsequntial accident of nature (skin colour) is made irrelevant beyond the point of total irrelevance the better."

I replied " Oh yes, just what we need as a society and a nation to ensure our future survival in a world where Peak Oil is about to hit and Eco-Conflicts begin is to allow people to enter and live in our country simply on the basis that they can run really, really fast. That the British people and British nation and British culture that has created such brilliant minds as Darwin, Newton, Stephenson, Charles Merz, Brunel, Dickens, Shakespeare, Roger Bacon, William Blake, Robert Grosseteste, Alexander Fleming, Charles Babbage, Tim Berners-Lee, Milton , Hobbes, Thomas Paine etc etc etc needs now to be surrendered so as to allow immigrants into our country and then justify their presence by saying they can run fast.

Pathetic.

That we should surrender our culture, ancestral rights and liberties and free speech just so that these immigrants who can run fast do not have to hear us complaining about the betrayal of all the wars and sacrifices our ancestors fought to keep our nation free.

As for the 'inconsequential' nature of our race, ask anyone from an ethnic minority if they feel their race is inconsequential. It is only white, self hating liberals who despise their own race as they have adopted the conditioned reflexive self hating guilt that Orwell wrote about. No other race but the whites want to destroy themselves or spend so much time on their knees pleading for forgiveness for the colour of their skin."

The comments that I had then managed to post a few times, then suddenly stopped.

A strange message then began to appear on the screen saying the site was now 'stopping spam' and that the moderators would vet the posts before putting them up.

Guess what - not one of the comments I put on the site were then allowed to go onto the site.

The mafia of the mediocre had decided to censor me and stop my free speech.

Pickled Politics had become proffesional hypocrites.

This is not unusual. I have done radio interviews before where the presenter has begun the interview before going live by saying that that he would allow me to stay on the show and debate with me.

Then when I have torn him and his arguments to pieces from the start, by the first break in the show I am usually removed.

What happens is that the media believe their own propaganda about us.

They say 'these people are thick, we can tear their arguments to pieces and they have no ideas we cannot destroy with our mighty brains' but then once they have to debate us, they realise that we are in fact intellectually and politically far superior to them.

All that the policy of No Platform has done is ensure that the journalists have gotten used to debating with the idiots of the mainstream parties.

Journalists are no longer capable of debating with us, as the quality of journalists is no longer such that they can debate with us.

For decades they have gotten used to debating with the idiots, middle ranking minds and muppets.

This is why they no longer debate with us, as they are now so dumbed down that they cannot win the debate.

Its like watching pygmies in a boxing ring boxing each other, whilst the real heavweight fighters have been forced to stand outside the ring in silence and watch as the pygmies are crowned the heavy weight champs of the world.

No Platform is another example, like way exams are made easier in schools, of our society dumbing down.

To ensure that the stupidscan feel good, the intelligent are either forced to become as stupid as the stupids or else are censored and ignored.

This is why we now live in an Idiocracy, where the idiot is the ideal.

This is also why programmes like Question Time and other political 'current affairs' shows are now so bloody boring.

Year after year, series after series, the same old boring politicians are hauled on to tell the same old boring bullshit to the British public.

Its like watching the political version of Jurassic Park, where only political dinosaurs are allowed to bellow and blow live on air.

Poor old Dimbelby must be bored rigid, it must be like Groundhog Day in the Question Time offices.

Things have to be bad if they invite Nigel Farrage on Question Time. To have the Kermit the Frog lookalike who runs a party filled with prostitute banging, corrupt, EU cash trough gorging, reactionary old farts on Question Time is a classic sign of morbidity.

That parrot is now deceased.

Those that say the Internet is the last bastion of free speech are deluding themselves.

Free speech is not free debate.

The Internet does not allow free debate, as the mafia of the mediocre that are the moderators on sites such as Pickled Politics, censor anyone they cannot intellectually contain and nullify.

Its like saying ' Here we have free speech ' and then denying anyone they cannot win a debate with access to the debating chamber.

It is nothing more than pure hypocrisy.

Here is my challenge - to anyone who thinks they can defeat me in a free and fair public debate on any political issues then get in touch.

Let me know where and when and we will have the debate. But I wont hold my breath.

Pickled Politics can kiss my proud, hairy, White, Anglo-Saxon arse.

NNP/ UAF Front Group Closes Down

It appears that the UAF front group the NNP, have been closed down by its ethnically diverse leader, sharon ebanks.

The group was established by a small group of extremists, uniform fetishists and saps just over a year ago in order to undermine the BNP's growth in Birmingham. It stood in the recent local elections in Birmingham in order to split the nationalist vote in areas where the BNP stood. Though only a few members of the general public were fooled by the muppets, the fact is that the attacks they directed at the BNP did have an effect on the parties growth.

The NNP as an organisation spent more time attacking the BNP than it ever did the Left. Ebanks herself was so often posting attacks on the BNP on the comments section of the UAF blog that even the Far Left got sick her of her constant attention seeking. It is alleged that the recent investigation into the BNP in Birmingham by the police over allegations that the nomination signaatures were forged came from the NNP. The fact that the police have shut down the investigation and said there was never any substance tio the allegations is irrelevant. The fact that the allegations were made not by the Far Left, but by so called 'nationalists', shows how low these people are.

I suspect that the next step of the demented harridan is that she will now write a book about her time in the BNP. What with her new UAF and far left contacts urging her to assist them in destroying the BNP one can assume that she will now become the new ethnically diverse face of the reformed BNP heretics. I bet you that Searchlight has the cheque book ready just in case she decides to pass on all her files to them.

From the Far Right to Rastafarianism in one small step.

For years Ebanks was collecting files, information and data on every muppet that fell for her bullshit. She has thousands of pages of e mails and gossip from all organisations within the Nationalist Movement. Her little clique of saps were busy passing her every little titbit of information they could gather in order to use it against the BNP , and anyone else that dared cross them.

We know that senior members of the BNP have passed her information in the past. Lets hope that when her book comes out their treachery is revealed.

Her little clique of simpering scumbag accomplices on Stormfront that assisted her and the UAF in its undermining of the BNP have been left stunned by the downfall of their dominatrix. It wasnt just the BNP saps that believed her bullshit, it was also people like David Duke, Don Black, the leaders of National Vanguard and members of other American groups who all fell for her bullshit.

Collectively they have all, both British and American, made Nationalism a laughing stock.

The retarded wing of pseudo-British Nationalism that regards the BNP ' as a sell out ' is now a joke. It is one of the great ironies of history that the last gasp of the old extremist far right was under the leadership of a half black female leader. It so absurd and hysterically funny that one doesnt know whether to consider this the ultimate in embarassment or irony. It is like some perverse Monty Python sketch where the extremists in their skrewdriver t-shirts, boots and braces are marched into a telephone box for a nazi meeting by their half black female leader. Talk about reinforcing the stereotype that skinheads are thick !

The nationalist movement as a whole has always had problems with angry and radicalised people of mixed race joining indigenous rights parties. The shadow side of multi-culturalism is that many people whose ancestry is of mixed race become confused and angry as a result of their lack of identity or become radicalised around their racial identity. The recent film 'This is England' made this point very powerfully with its story about the half black skinhead racist leader.

Just as many people with mixed race ancestry with black skin ( instead of white skin ) become radical black nationalists, and disciples of Malcolm X, Chuck D and Public Enemy, so many others become radical far right white extremists. The fact that multi-culturalism is predicated on race, and is the most racist political and social system since National Socialism ensures that race and racial identity becomes a powerful social issue. Under Multi-Culturalism Race is the most powerful dynamic at work within society.

The children of many mixed race relationships are in an invidious position. They face racism from both communities and pressure from the political and social systems to define themselves according to their race. The fact that the facile use of skin colour by organisations such as the CRE to base affirmative action and positive discrimination laws on, means that those from a mixed race beackground have to 'choose a side'. One one side if they define themselves as white they suffer legalised racism, discrimination, rejection and disadvantage as legitimised under Sections 37 and 38 of the Race Relations Act 1976.

If they define themselves as black then they can use that self defined racial status as the basis of race dicrimination claims, positive discrimination advantages and be awarded rights under affirmative actions plans. Multi-Culturalism has legitimised and institutionalised racism - it is the shadow of Nazism and reflects the Nazi worldview of race as being at the centre of society.

Those who come from single parents families and mixed race relationships and who have no contact with their whole family, as often happens , usually end up identifying with just one side of their racial ancestry. If they have black skin , they become black. If they have white skin they become white. In such circumstances they often adopt extremist views as a way of rejecting their own confusion.

These people are not motivated by love of themselves or their own people, they are motivated by self hate and this often manifests itself in extreme behaviour.

Multi-Culturalism is a crime not just against humanity, as it destroys the innate diversity of indigenous peoples, but also against individuals.

It has created a society where the racism of anti-racism is used to institutionalise racism, and where the facile denominators of race, such as skin colour, are used to remove individual rights.
The NNP/ UAF were a pustule on the face of British politics, a running sore that poisoned nationalism.

The fact that the boil has now burst is good news for nationalism, but bad news for the saps and traitors that worked with the NNP to bring down the BNP.

Good riddance to bad rubbish.