Sharia Law, Gandhi and India

Superb article in The Telegraph ;

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/07/05/do0501.xml



The lesson for those that say we can reach an accomodation with Shari Law and that we should also show tolerance to the demands of those Islamists and Isamic politicians and their spokesmen in the media that push for a role for Sharia Law in our legal, political and economic systems is that of India.

Both Gandhi and Nehru preached a message of tolerance to Islam and allowed Sharia Law to exist in the Indian legal system and said that Indian society should accomodate the demands of Islam and Sharia Law.

Gandhi said that Islamic terrorism should be met only with peaceful protest.

Whilst he pranced about India in a loin cloth preaching tolerance, the Islamist terrorists and seperatists were stocking up on ammunition and rifles.

This adoption of apathy to counter terrorism led directly to the partition of India and over a million people slaughtered in the civil war that erupted, and then meant that India was torn in two and Pakistan created.

That is the lesson that history teaches us when we adopt the liberal approach to Sharia Law and Islamic terrorism - that the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Surrendering to Sharia Law is the surrender of our nation, democracy and liberty.

Sharia Law must be extirpated from our nation, as the moment we tolerate the intolerable in the name of tolerance we surrender the future itself.

At the same time the ideology of Liberalism that has disarmed our society must be extirpated from our political and legal systems so that we can defend our country from the Islamist threats. Also the Zionist Networks in our society that seek to undermine the political growth of the BNP must be exposed and dismantled. The Zionists attack the BNP simply because we are British Nationalists and not subservient to the interests of Israel.

Both the power and influence of the Liberals and the Zionist Networks must be removed so that we can defend our nation.






Is cosying up to Muslim extremists the best way to defeat terrorism?
By Charles Moore


The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, was nice about sharia this week. It is not "only about mandating sanctions such as stoning, flogging, the cutting off of hands and death to those who do not comply with the law", he said. And the provisions of sharia "do not include the repression of women".

Read more by Charles Moore
Lord Phillips admitted that he did not claim "special expertise" in the field, but he had been to see some sharia chaps in Oman and they had seemed very civilised.


Lord Chief Justice embracing sharia law
Anyway, his main point was that sharia might be useful here in mediating disputes about things such as marriage.

Well, it is surely true that the customary practices of various religions can be effective ways to reach agreement. Where these are compatible with wider law, as they are in the case of Jewish religious courts, they should be valued.

And it is true that sharia is not "only" about nasty punishments. But such punishments are indeed part of sharia (40 lashes for drinking alcohol is a widely accepted tariff, for example; 100 lashes for fornication), even if they are not always applied. Lord Phillips also did not mention that sharia upholds polygamy for men, prescribes a lower compensation for injury to a Muslim woman or a non-believer than to a Muslim man, and gives less value to their testimony in court. A little bit of repression of women there, Lord Phillips?

Sharia also traditionally insists on a second-class status of citizenship for Jews and Christians. All four main schools of sharia say that the penalty for apostasy - abandoning the faith - is death.

advertisementLord Phillips was speaking at the London Muslim Centre, which is part of the East London Mosque. Dr Mohammed Abdul Bari, the head of the Muslim Council of Britain, introduced him. Dr Bari said that British judges must be "sensitive to our divine laws on personal relationships and family matters". How sensitive? Up to four wives at once allowed?

He also quoted from the Koran to show the importance of justice in Islam. I looked up the two quotations. The first appears in a chapter called "Women", which says things like: "The male shall inherit twice as much as a female". The bit about judging with fairness appears just after the following: "Those that deny Our revelations will burn with fire." The second quotation, also about judging with fairness, comes in a passage about how Jews who believe the wrong things must be punished.

Of course, you could find some blood-curdling things in Jewish and Christian scriptures, but the difference for our society today is that neither Jews nor Christians are trying to establish a state based on the political implementation of their religion. Islamists are.

It is this question of context that bedevils the way Britain tries to handle the problems of Muslim extremism. I wonder, for example, how much the Lord Chief Justice knew about his venue.

The East London Mosque is considered respectable. But if you read Ed Husain's remarkable book The Islamist, about how he embraced extremism and later rejected it, you find that it was the East London Mosque that helped him learn to hate the West. On Saturday evenings, he would listen to talks at the mosque along these lines, often inspired by the dead Islamist writer Abul Alah Mawdudi. Mawdudi incited the creation of a wholly Islamic society by "organised struggle, sparing neither life nor property for this purpose". Many leading figures in the Muslim Council of Britain are admirers of Mawdudi.

There is a similar problem with the Government's efforts against terrorism. A huge programme called Contest, with a subset called Prevent, is supposed to address the hearts and minds of young Muslims. If you read its latest strategy document, you find that its definition of "shared values" has little idea of Britishness. Its section on "grievances" implies that the root causes of extremism are Britain's own racism, inequality or foreign policy. Its proposed "structures" to prevent violent extremism are a cat's cradle of interdepartmental confusion.

If you can cut through the jungle of jargon, you find "a risk-based preventing violent extremism action plan". This risk is never explained, but it seems to mean that the groups promised the money to wean the young off violent extremism will often be pretty extremist themselves.

And so it proves. The Mosques and Imams Advisory Board, which tries to keep mosques free of baddies, includes representation of the Muslim Association of Britain, which is a British arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, one of the oldest Islamist organisations in the world. To help purge violent extremism from universities, a new organisation has emerged called Campusalam. At its launch, it gave a platform to three Muslim Brotherhood men. Mawdudi supporters have also got state money to revise the teaching of Islam in British universities.

Later this month, Labour may well lose the by-election in Glasgow East to the Scottish National Party. Nearby, in Glasgow Central, the SNP candidate is Osama Saeed. Mr Saeed is now the adviser on Islamic matters for Alex Salmond, the First Minister. "Scotland can be the hub for the Muslim world," he says. As part of the Scottish Contest programme, he offers young Muslims "alternatives" to al-Qa'eda material on the internet. This is how he proposes to do it: "When people talk about deradicalisation, the last thing you want to do is say you must be against terrorism." At various times, Mr Saeed has told Western countries that they must change their foreign policy to avoid being blown up, praised "martyrdom operations" (suicide bombing) and called on Scottish Muslims to act "in defiance" of police inquiries about terrorism. He is the Scottish spokesman of the Muslim Brotherhood.

There is a theory behind all this. It is a sort of bastard child of the Northern Ireland peace process. It says that the West is "morally crippled" by its behaviour towards Muslims. It must reach out to all those Islamist extremists who are not actually personally involved in blowing anyone up and recognise, in the words of one of its proponents, Alistair Crooke, that Islamism is "founded on rehabilitated human values". Then it must empower them. Only they, backed with our money, the theory goes, will be able to deliver the terrorists.

Next week, a big exhibition at Olympia called Islam Expo, with stalls from delightful governments like Sudan and Iran, will give a platform to this grand coalition of Islamists under the banner of "Understanding Political Islam". And a minister, Shahid Malik, will appear on television for the anniversary of July 7, 2005 (when Muslim extremists murdered British people of all religions), to say that Muslims are "under siege like the Jews" under the Nazis.

So the solution to extremism is that extremists become the official representatives of Islam in this country. Islamist mosques, organisations and spokesmen will be treated as the true voice of Muslims (and woe betide those Muslims who disagree). Then we shall get a lot more sharia than Lord Phillips has bargained for.

Burn Down Hollywood

Hi to the readers of the Jewish Chronicle - if you are reading this please also go to this page for an update on this article ;

http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2008/06/jewish-chronicle-interview.html






I went to the cinema yesterday to watch the latest Indiana Jones movie. Yet again the same old tired Hollywood stereotypical villains were in the film.

We had the English actor Ray Winstone playing a double crossing working class English man and the English actress Cate Blanchett playing a Russian villainess.

As usual the Hollywood writers were slandering the English and the Russians, though uniquely in this film managing to doubly insult the Russians by using mainly English actors to play Russians.

In the comedy Witless Protection, another recently released movie the bad guy in that film is also an Englishman. In fact in almost all of the recent Hollywood movies the evil Englishman has replaced the evil German Nazi as the new bad guy.

Before the villain was blonde and blue eyed and German, now they are blonde and blue eyed and English or Russian.

Almost all the evil villains in the movies today are white and English or white and Russian.

Ever wondered why it that Hollywood has never churned out any films about a Jewish mass murderer serial killer ( such as Baruch Goldstein) an Orthodox Rabbi as a corrupt money grabbing shyster ( such as the Christian priest in There Will Be Blood), a film about the Columbine massacres that states that Dylan Klebold was Jewish (as opposed to the US media that called him a white Nazi ), a movie about Ted Bundy that pointed out he was Jewish, a film about John Wayne Gacy that featured the fact he was Jewish or a film about Lazar Kaganovich the Butcher of the Ukraine who was also Jewish.

This is simply because Hollywood is run by Jews, and following the best tradition of ethno-centrism those Jewish power brokers in Hollywood prefer to denigrate those of other racial groups but not their own.

To say that Hollywood is run by Jews is not anti-semitic. It is simply a fact that it is a small group of Jews who control Hollywood. They themselves like to crow about that fact quite regularly.

To call someone anti-semitic for pointing out to people what the Jews in Hollywood themselves regularly boast about of themselves is a disgusting slur. Those who call people anti-semites are usually the biggest racists of all.

Those that use the slur of anti-Semitism to silence debate on Jewish power structures and the power of individual Jews and the Jewish community in our nations are usually the most vicious and extreme racists in our societies. They use the slur of anti-Semitism to ensure their racism is never mentioned. It is the racial version of the Marxist-Leninist Terrorism of the Word.

Kevin McDonald in his ’Culture of Critique’ pointed out in his books that order to ensure Jewish group solidarity that the self appointed political leaders of the Jewish community in the US has actively sought to undermine group solidarity in other ethnic and racial groups. This has been done through a variety of ways from pushing for immigration reform to allow in mass immigration into the US, creating the most powerful lobby group in the US the AIPAC organisation, through supporting left wing and liberal causes such as multi-culturalism and political correctness to controlling sections of the media and entertainment industry.

None of these manifestations of Jewish ethno-communalism are by themselves reprehensible, what is reprehensible though is when individuals of the Jewish community have abused the powers they have accrued in any society to damage the nation, society and to slander and vilify individual racial and ethnic groups for their own ends, or the interests of the Jewish community as a whole.

The ethno-centrism and ethno-communalism of the Jewish people is an admirable example for us all, and one we should also follow. But what is unforgivable is that instead of just seeking to support their own community some individuals amongst the Jewish communities in our nations have sought to undermine the group loyalty, group cohesion, identities and communal structures of other racial groups for their own benefit.

This is an abuse of their powers and one that must be resisted.

The fact that the self appointed ‘leaders’ of the Jewish community have created an America riven by racial hatred between all racial groups, a crime epidemic as a result of their liberal values promoted in the media, glamorised in their films and newspapers a drug culture that as a result is now devastating black communities with crack and white communities with Meth Amphetamine, have used the media they control to propagandise illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and to demolish and destroy white communal solidarity leading to a crisis in white identity means that these idiots have placed the entire Jewish community , and all other communities, at risk.

The dysfunctional nature of US society that these self appointed leaders that control Hollywood and large sections of the media (either directly through media ownership or through creating a climate of fear where any criticism of individual Jews is called anti-Semitism and also by the power of Jewish lobby groups to exert undue political and economic influence on programme makers ) have created has destroyed American social cohesion, social stability, caused America to be despised internationally and led to the downfall of America as a functional nation and society. Almost all the negative social pathologies existing in todays America can be traced back to the actions of a tiny clique of fools, activists and ideologues who have placed all of America, and their own community, at risk.

This ethno-communalism though most often is ‘in your face racism’ against non-Jewish groups also manifests itself in other more subtle ways.

For example why is it Hollywood, or for that fact any British documentary film makers, have never made a film or documentary on the Zebra Killers and the Death Angels in the Nation of Islam.

Is the systematic murder and torture of hundreds of whites by racist militant blacks in the 1960's and 1970's who were members of a death cult at the centre of one of the largest and most powerful black organisations on the planet, not news worthy ?

Hollywood has two standard depictions of blacks in its films. The Saints and the Sinners. The Saints are the noble, wise, father figure types like Morgan Freeman in The Shawshank Redemption or Will Smith as the pilot / doctor saving the world in Independence Day or I am Legend or Denzil Washington as the hero cop / fireman. In most of these films Whites are depicted as stupid / racist / inept or incompetent and unable to solve the crime / win the war until the black hero (or Jewish hero such as Jeff Goldblum in Independence Day or Jurassic Park ) appears and solves the crime / saves the planet and either kills the racist white man or becomes his best buddy.

In Independence Day we had the Black Hero and the Jewish Hero saving the world as the drunk, feckless, trailer park living, white redneck pilot we all laughed at was able to ’redeem’ himself by committing suicide.

This patronising twaddle is the staple of most Hollywood movies, with the sub text being that whites are stupid racists and blacks / Jews should replace them.

Then we get the Sinners. These are usually black crack heads who are forced to join gangs and become criminals because of racism / racist cops or because of violence from white racists.

You also of course get the evil Mexican drug dealers, Chinese spies and kung fu killers, South African Nazis, Russian killers and hitmen and Balkans hitch hiker torturers.

See the pattern yet.

How many films can you name where the evil villain has been Jewish.

Even in films concerning real life events such as the Columbine Massacres, the Ted Bundy murders, the John Wayne Gacy murders, the Leopold and Loeb murders etc etc then the fact of the Jewish ethnicity of the killers is either hidden or minimised.

One film that was unique was the recent movie Alpha Dogs about the murder of a young man in Los Anegles, the elder brother of the victim Zack Mazursky , played by the actor Ben Foster, was portrayed as a Neo-Nazi Jew with tattoos of Hitler and Jewish scripture on his body. Another was The Believer where the neo-Nazi was also an ex-orthodox Jew.

Both films were subtle messages to the children of mixed white and Jewish marriages that if they adopted their white heritage they are Nazis, and only by becoming being Jewish in culture and identity can they be decent human beings. This sort of message is racism at its very worst. It is an abuse of the power of the cinema, and is on a par with the propaganda of the Nazis themselves.

The time has come for all racial groups to resist this Nazi propaganda pumped out by Hollywood and its cabal of Jewish extremists who control the Hollywood studios.

From now on the next time I read of a Hollywood movie in production that seeks to depict whites, blacks etc etc in a way that is racist, partitioning and demeaning then I intend to start a call for people to boycott those films.

The Nuremberg Tribunal hung Julius streicher for his depictions of Jews as evil and sub human, and I believe the same rule should apply to those who depict whites or blacks or any ethnic groups as sub humans or inherently criminal.

The damage done by Hollywood to our nations, societies and cultures is immense and the racists that run Hollywood must be resisted.


LIST OF ENGLISH / BRITISH BAD GUYS. These are just some of the films with English / British bad guys ;

The original Star Wars trilogy4 is an interesting case. On the side of evil we have the Empire, whose officers sound quite British. The baddest of the bad, however, is Darth Vader, voiced by James Earl Jones, an American. It is interesting to note, though, that casting Jones was a decision that came late in the film and he merely overdubbed the lines of the British actor who played Darth Vader. Also, Vader was redeemed at the end of The Return of the Jedi, and imperial officers were not. On the side of good, most of the characters had American accents, including the über-American, space cowboy Han Solo. But there is an exception in the Star Wars movies, as well. Sir Alec Guinness gives the role of Obi-wan Kenobi his most deliciously wise English voice. He is a remnant of the old order, a mentor guiding our young brash hero, and is still in line with the prevailing stereotypes.


Tim Roth as the Russian and English monster in the film' The Incredible Hulk '.

Ray Winstone Indiana Jones 4 and Cate Blanchett as a Russian and also all those blonde nazis in the first 3 Indian Jones movies

Gone in Sixty Seconds

Tango and Cash

The Aristocats

Alan Rickman in Die Hard (a case of an English actor playing a Germanic character with a slight accent),

Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves

Quigley Down Under.

Anthony Hopkins in The Silence of the Lambs6.

Basil Rathbone in Anna Karenina,

David Copperfield, Son of Frankenstein

The Mark of Zorro7

Ben Kingsley in Sneakers.

Betty Lou Gerson as the definitive villainess,

Cruella DeVille in 101 Dalmations
(see also American actress Glenn Close playing the same role for the live-action remake).

Charles Dance in Last Action Hero.

Christopher Lee in (among many others) Star Wars: Attack of the Clones and The Lord of the Rings Trilogy.

Claude Rains in Notorious8.

David Bowie in Labyrinth and

The Last Temptation of Christ (in which all the non-Roman biblical characters are played by Americans).

Dougray Scott in Mission: Impossible 2.

George Sanders in Rebecca and Walt Disney's The Jungle Book.

James Mason in North by Northwest , Salem's Lot and The Verdict.

Jeremy Irons in Die Hard With a Vengeance (where again, it's an English actor playing a Germanic character), The Lion King and The Time Machine.

John Lithgow in Cliffhanger and Shrek (American actor hamming as British, though Lithgow has also played his fair share of homegrown villains, too).

Jonathan Hyde in Jumanji

Joss Ackland in Lethal Weapon 2 (British actor, South African accent!)

Pam Ferris in Matilda

Patrick Stewart in Conspiracy Theory

Peter Cushing in Star Wars9 (an example of the Imperialism mentioned above being used as short-hand to differentiate between the old order (Jedis and the Empire) and the new (the Rebellion Alliance).

Pierce Brosnan in Mrs Doubtfire10.

Ray Milland in Dial M for Murder.

Richard Attenborough in Jurassic Park (

Sir Ian McKellen in X-Men11

Steven Berkoff in Beverly Hills Cop and Rambo 2 as a Russian.

Tim Curry in The Rocky Horror Picture Show (alongside Richard O'Brien and Patricia Quinn, both sporting East-European accents).

Timothy Dalton in The Shadow.

Tom Wilkinson in Rush Hour.

Vinnie Jones in The Unforgiven

Vinnie Jones in all his films

CLIFFHANGER with sylvester stallone with english bad guy

Rambo 4 - english bad guy big mouted ex-SAS thug

Green street hooligans

I.D

Outlaw