The Joy of Diversity

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Terrorism-British-Terrorists-With-Links-To-Al-Qaeda-Behind-67-Of-Islamism-Related-Terror-In-UK/Article/201007115659310?lpos=UK_News_First_Home_Article_Teaser_Region_1&lid=ARTICLE_15659310_Terrorism:_British_Terrorists_With_Links_To_Al_Qaeda_Behind_67%25_Of_Islamism_Related_Terror_In_UK



'Brits Behind Most UK Islam-Linked Terror'

* Share
*
*
o Share
* Comments (37)

8:37am UK, Monday July 05, 2010

David Crabtree, Midlands correspondent
The bulk of Islamism-related terror offences in the UK over the past decade involved British citizens with links to al Qaeda, according to a new report.

The Centre for Social Cohesion found that 69% of such incidents between 1999 and 2009 were carried out by home grown terrorists or would-be terrorists.

The research also suggested that seven of the UK's eight major bomb plot cells contained individuals with direct links to al Qaeda.

Only the failed London bombers of July 21, 2005, lacked undisputed evidence of direct contact with any proscribed organisation.

Some 48% of the 127 Islamism-related terror offences or suicide attacks were committed by individuals living in London, the report found.

The next two most common regions were the West Midlands (13%) and Yorkshire and the Humber (9%).

The report concluded: "Al Qaeda and al Qaeda-inspired terrorism remains the biggest threat to the UK's national security.

"The Security Service estimates that over 2,000 people in the UK pose a terrorist threat and in March 2005 it was estimated that there were up to 200 al Qaeda-trained operatives in the UK.

The report, Islamist Terrorism: The British Connections, stated that the British-based threat does not only affect the UK.

A number of British Muslims have been convicted in foreign courts or have fought for, or trained with, terrorist or extremist Islamist groups abroad, the report outlined.

The Equality Act, Foreign Aid and Killing the Welfare State

The decision of the Lib-Con Government to retain the New Labour ideological anti-white and racist Equality Act has to be seen in the context of the announcement that the government is going to cut 40 % of jobs from some front line public services.

THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF THE DISMANTLING OF THE WELFARE STATE - on the pretext that we the people must suffer in order to pay for the incompetence and corruption of the global capitalists and bankers.

The global economic crash was engineered by the globalists in order to allow governments to cut public services and destroy the remaining nation based Welfare State systems of the planet - so that the global corporations can then privatise them in accord with WTO rules competition rules and profit from them.

What we saw in Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union with the massive state sell off and shut down we are now witnessing in the West.

The same globalists, bankers, banks, bankers, corporations and economists that caused the crash in Russia are the same ones that caused this crash.

The Welfare State is illegal under world trade rules, and therefore this economic crash, caused by deliberate de-regulation by governments to allow global capitalism to grow rich whilst it grew out of control, has allowed governments the opportunity to cut back public services pushed by the globalists.

Globalism requires and demands the erosion of the power of nation states in order to ensure the removal and the destruction of national based welfare state systems and their replacement by global corporations operating for profit to provide public services instead of governments.

The public service ethos is to be replaced by loyalty to corporate profits.

But most important is the announcement that the government will not cut the 13 Billion per year foreign aid budget - which in effect is a big 'FUCK YOU' and finger from the government to the people.

The government in effect are saying 'Its your money we are spending, but we are not going to spend it on you and for your benefit, but instead we are going to spend it on the welfare of foreigners whilst we cut public services for you'.

If the British people accept this, then they deserve all they get frankly.

If the British people are willing to remain silent and supine when THEIR government impoverishes our own people, whist promoting the welfare of strangers, then they deserve all they fucking get.

They dont deserve to survive, if they are that stupid.

If they accept it then I am going to nominate the British people for the 2011 Darwin Awards.

I dont think they will though.

I think they will rise up when they realise what has happened to them.

We must begin to explain to the people that this is what is happening.

In the BNP manifesto I foresaw this would become an major issue in politics, and so pushed for it to be included in our policies, which it duly was.

I believe we should have really hit hard the truth that the BNP could cut taxes, retain existing support for public services AND improve efficiency and waiting times by RE-NATIONALISING THE WELFARE STATE.

This was to enact laws that prohibit all non-British citizens from access to all public services.

We need to issue all vetted, registered and checked British Citizens with a Public Services Entitlement Card that allows them to access public services.

Those without a public services card would be denied access to any public services, and those who assist or facilitate by action or ommission those without a public service card accessing public services would become classified as fraud or attempted fraud.

Those who helped foreigners access our services would be committing what they are already, but get away with, which is theft.

That way we could then deal with them and deport them.

We now need to go on the offensive on the issue of NATIONALISING THE WELFARE STATE.

Paddy Ashdown was on the porcine media maggot Adam Boulton show today, and he said that because the bankers fucked the economy up, that we have to accept that all parties will have to cut public services.

Bollocks.

The Lib-Con Government are not NATIONALISTS.

A NATIONALIST GOVERNMENT IS A VERY DIFFERENT BEAST TO A LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE BASTARD GOVERNMENT.

A nationalist government would end the Internationalisation of our public services.

Whilst the Lib Lab Con scum cut our public services whilst funding Third World Dictators and resource rich dictatorships across the world in the guise of 'foreign aid' at the same time they have allowed our country to become the welfare spongers centre of the planet.

Every welfare parasite from across the planet comes to Britain to suck us dry, and the idiot politicians of the mainstream parties know it and endorse it with their inaction and apathy.

Britain must become a nation that shuts it doors to all ;

1) asylum seekers

2) all new immigration

3) International welfare benefit tourism

4) abuse of the NHS by Health Tourists who want and get free treatment

5) all economic migration.

No foreigner or illegal immigrant must be entitled to any NHS treatment, benefits, housing, legal aid, education and access to pensions etc.

Only the British people should be able to access any public services.

This would save Britain tens of billions of pounds a year as we cut waiting lists and waiting times, whilst raising the amount of money we can spend on research into treating illnesses.

The foreigners who come to Britain in their millions, the millions of illegal immigrants in Britain and the health tourists that come here just for free NHS treatment ( and then skip the bills if they are asked to pay) - all of these people are stealing out taxes.

The government is allowing them to steal our taxes, because the Lib Con Government wankers are too scared of being called 'racists' to resist this theft from our people.

Instead the Lib Con Traitors pay our taxes to foreigners in the foreign aid budget, at the same time as they allow millions of parasites to flood into Britain and steal our taxes and destroy our hard fought for and much loved Welfare State.


The choice is now clear - we can Re-Nationalise the Welfare State or we can Dismantle the Welfare State.


The choice is therefore Nationalism or globalism.


Let the battle begin.

Finally - a good rock track

Finally a British rock band release something that impresses, especially the Pixies / Nirvana style rock drumming and guitar work at the end of the track.

Get them a top producer and this band could be massive.


Excellent.


Death by Diamonds and Pearls by Band of Skulls ;


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnW91MAIBhU&feature=related

Israel and the Russian Spies in America

Since 911 more than 60 Israeli spies have been arrested and prosecuted in the US, yet the media are only making headlines about the 10 Russians arrested in America - but they say nothing aabout Israel and its spy rings in the US.

Why ?

Because the Zionist media own America, and the British media are in the grip of the Zionists and want to pump out anti-Russian rhetoric whilst ignoring Israeli syping and criminality.



http://www.aim.org/media-monitor/israeli-spies-in-america/


Israeli Spies In America


By Reed Irvine and Cliff Kincaid | December 31, 2001

“These are the last people in the media who are going to spread wild rumors about the Israelis.”
Fox News, the conservative news channel, was the source of a recent report that seemed to put America’s ally, Israel, in a bad light. Reporter Carl Cameron said, “Since September 11, more than 60 Israelis have been arrested or detained, either under the new patriot anti-terrorism law, or for immigration violations. A handful of active Israeli military were among those detained, according to investigators, who say some of the detainees also failed polygraph questions when asked about alleged surveillance activities against and in the United States.”

One observer noted that Fox seems to be the most pro-Israel news channel on TV and that is why the Cameron story was such a shock. “These are the last people in the media who are going to spread wild rumors about the Israelis,” he said.

Cameron, alluding to conspiracy theories in the Arab world that Israel may have been behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks on America, added, “There is no indication that the Israelis were involved in the 9-11 attacks, but investigators suspect that the Israelis may have gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance, and not shared it.” Cameron went further in a discussion with Fox News bureau chief Brit Hume, quoting investigators as saying about the Israelis: “A bigger question, they say, is how could they not have known [about 9/11]?”

Emanuel A. Winston, a pro-Israel commentator and analyst on Middle East affairs, says it is obvious that the Israelis were spying on Arab or Islamic agents in the U.S. He says the Israelis in America were spying on Arab agents who were clearly connected to the same terrorist organizations which were attacking Israel daily. Winston says the FBI was supposed to be doing the same kind of surveillance in order to protect the American people. As he put it, “The question now is not whether Israel was tracking Arab agents in America but: Why were the American defense agencies NOT tracking them?”

Carl Cameron of Fox seemed to confirm Winston’s point, saying that one group of Israelis was suspected of keeping an apartment in California to spy on a group of Arabs who the United States is also investigating for links to terrorism. But in contrast to the report that Israel did not warn America in advance, Winston claimed that when Israel sent two Mossad agents to warn their counterparts in the CIA/FBI about an impending attack before 9/11, “they were ignored and pushed aside.” This is apparently a reference to a report in the Daily Telegraph of London that Israeli intelligence officials had traveled to Washington before 9/11 to warn the CIA and the FBI that a cell of up to 200 terrorists was planning a major operation.

The paper said that Israeli officials specifically warned their counterparts in Washington that “large-scale terrorist attacks on highly visible targets on the American mainland were imminent.” They offered no specific information about targets, but they did link the plot to Osama bin Laden, and they told the U.S. there was “strong grounds” for suspecting Iraqi involvement. Evidence, of course, has linked bin Laden to the attacks and there is circumstantial evidence that has developed about an Iraqi role.

Colonisation and the Death of Britain

Colonisation is killing Britain.

We are losing our own cultures and replacing them with colonisation.




http://www.lbc.co.uk/why-cockney-could-disappear-from-east-end-26475



Why Cockney Could Disappear From East End

A study claims the Cockney accent could disappear from the East End within the next thirty years.

It may have be spoken in London for more than 500 years -lingusts at Lancaster University believe it's moving further East.

They say instead an accent called 'Jafaican' - a mix of Cockney, Bangladeshi and West Indian could become common.

One Bullet = Problem Solved

I wouldnt waste a single franc on this piece of scum.

One bullet to the back of the head = problem solved.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnzjQMDbYrQ&feature=player_embedded

Hide Your Drugs Here Please !

I am sure there will be many, many more 'sikhs' (in reality people pretending to be sikhs) entering the country with turbans on due to this ' Hide your drugs here please, when you enter Britain' idiotic decision.

One law for ethnics, one law for everyone else.

If they are British, then they must accept we have one set of laws in this country that applies to everyone equally regardless of race or religion.

If they do not wish to abide by those laws, then leave.





http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1291119/U-turn-humiliating-turban-airport-security-searches-sikhs.html#ixzz0sRYKlYqR



U-turn on 'humiliating' turban airport security searches for sikhs

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 11:13 AM on 1st July 2010

* Comments (77)
* Add to My Stories


Dr Indarjit Singh CBE

Dr Indarjit Singh CBE: 'There are different ways of upsetting people'

Sikhs travelling through Britain's aiports will no longer undergo 'humiliating' searches of their turbans following fierce criticism of the policy.

Just two months ago security staff were told they could pat down and unravel a sikh's turban if the metal detector bleeped as they walked through.

But these powers - given under European legislation - were branded as unaccpetable by the religion's leaders in Britain and the Department of Transport has had to act quickly.

'It is considered very offensive to remove or touch a Sikh's turban, especially in public,' said Dr Indarjit Singh CBE, advisor to the Commission for Racial Equality.

'It's the equivalent of asking someone to undergo a strip search in public in western culture.

'Different things are considered insulting in different cultures - there are different ways of upsetting people, and we should try to keep that to a minimum.'

A spokesperson for Birmingham International Airport said: 'On Thursday the Department for Transport advised all UK airports to continue using the previous methods of screening religious headwear, which eliminates the need to carry out hand searches. We have reacted accordingly.'

Sikhs who set off alarms at airport body scanners will now have their turban scanned by a hand held wand, and will only be subjected to searches by hand if metal is detected in the turban.

Harmander Singh, Principal Advisor to Sikhs in England, added that the security measures were 'ludicrous'.

He said: 'Sikhs are being unfairly targeted. As far as I'm aware, there haven't been any exploding turbans at airports yet. Just because Osama Bin Laden chooses to wear one doesn't mean that Sikhs should have to suffer.'

The turban is worn by all Sikhs and is a key symbol of their faith, which shares some values of Hinduism and Islam.

Dr Singh conceded that searches at airports are a vital security precaution, but said: 'Security staff at airports must understand the particular significance of touching the turban.

'Sikhs do live in the real world, but we don't want to be subjected to constant searches at airports.'

A spokesperson for the Department for Transport said: 'We will work with the airport industry and religious communities to find an acceptable long-term solution to this issue.'