Monday, 23 August 2010

How To Save Britain

Here is who you solve the debt.

You set up a Bank of Britain.

Under the rules of Fractional Reserve Banking you put half a trillion pounds into that bank from the Bank of England.

Then you expand that money by a factor of ten so it becomes 5 trillion pounds.

You then inject that excess capital into creating a new manufacturing and industrial base in Britain such as new coal mines, coal liquefaction and electricity generation plants, infra-structure renewal projects to increase productivity and efficeincy for business, green energy projects, new scientific and technical universities etc to create a whole new Industrial Revolution.

The money from the Bank of England and held in the Bank of Britain is a long term project guaranteed by government, so bonds can be sold to private investors to also raise private capital to be held in the Bank of Britain.

The pensions debts can be offset by the money in the Bank of Britain and as the nationalised banks go back into profit this is used to pay off the debt owed to the Bank of England, whilst tax income from the new industrial projects is used to pay off the debt to the Bank of Britain.

Job done.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/7957110/Government-urged-to-reveal-true-national-debt-of-4.8trillion.html


Government urged to reveal 'true' national debt of £4.8 trillion
The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) has calculated that the national debt is £4.8 trillion once state and public sector pension liabilities are included, or £78,000 for every person in the UK.


By Philip Aldrick, Economics Editor
Published: 7:33PM BST 20 Aug 2010
Stacks of £50 notes
Stacking up: the national debt equates to £78,000 for every person in Britain Photo: GETTY IMAGES

The IEA raised its concerns after the latest public finances data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) this week, which showed that the total debt, excluding bank bail-outs, is £816bn – itself a record high. However, the figures strip out the state's pension liabilities in a contravention of standard accounting practices.

Mark Littlewood, the IEA's director-general, said: "The latest official national debt figure is seriously misleading. Looming in the background are pension liabilities. These should be moved to the forefront.

Related Articles

*
OECD tells Government to cut spending or face hardship for years to come
*
Tory plans to cut inheritance tax send the wrong message
*
William Littlewood: 'Falls below the lows in March should not be ruled out'
*
UK government debt: almost 9p of each £1 in tax will be needed to pay the interest
*
Like Mr Micawber, Britain finds itself in a debtors' prison
*
Government white paper paves way for City 'super-regulator'

"The ONS should include these liabilities in their calculations. It is shocking enough to see official figures revealing a jump in national debt over the last year from the equivalent of 48pc of GDP to 56pc, but the grave reality is that our real national debt stands at 333pc of GDP."

Nick Silver, an IEA research fellow, said the full figure, including the £1.2 trillion public sector pension liability and £2.7 trillion state pension liability, should be published either monthly or annually alongside the net debt data for reasons of transparency.

The ONS has already begun to assemble the data, publishing the full list of Britain's debts and liabilities for the first time in July, which came to a total of between £3.68 trillion and £4.84 trillion.

Aileen Simkins, ONS director of operations on economic statistics, said the figures would be updated in September and that the ONS plans to compile and release them on an annual basis "to begin with".

"We are in no doubt that there is a bigger number that is also relevant to public data," she said. "We think it is important to have more transparency on public sector debt – looking at figures that go beyond standard monthly net debt and include state and public sector pensions."

The ONS numbers included a £1 trillion to £1.5 trillion liability for the Government's stakes in the part-nationalised banks, equivalent to the relevant portion of their total liabilities, £1.35 trillion for state pension liabilities, and £1.2 trillion for public sector pensions.


















Add to Technorati Favorites

Sunday, 22 August 2010

The Red Pill 3

Follow the link below for the video interview for Celente.

Celente is correct in his thesis as what we have seen with the nationalisation of the banks is the takeover of nation states by the banks - and the creation of a form of International Corporate Fascism, or the New World order as it is also known.

International Corporate Fascism is where the national economies, governments and banks have been taken over by the international bankers.

Contrary to the propaganda put out by the Corporate Media, the banks havent been nationalised, the banks and bankers have in fact taken over our nations and national economies.

The banks havent been nationalised, our nations have been privatised.

Our nations are now run by the bankers and globalist institutions like the World Bank and its regional groupings such as the EU.

This is why we require a form of Nationalist Class Warfare, where the people of nation states rise up against the puppet politicians that serve the globalist supra-national institutions like the WTO, World Bank, EU, US banks etc etc and against the bankers and other traitors in our nation.

We must at all costs ensure that Marxist Class Warfare does not gain popular support in our society as the Marxists are the Red stormtroopers of the Global Capitalists, as the capitalists fund and support the red groups, such as George Soros and the foundations and NGO's he funds that run the red groups in our country.

Nationalist Class Warfare is against the internationalists and globalists in our country who serve the global corporations and other supra-national institutions - and the aim of Nationalist Class Warfare must be to repatriate political power back to the British people from those global banks and globalist institutions to enable us to get our trillions of pounds of tax money back from the banks and bankers which was given away to them by Gordon Brown, and for us to use that money when we get it back to create a National Economy that will support the creation of a National Community and get our people back into work.

If the crash causes a rise in support for Marxist Class Warfare, then the only winners will be the global capitalists who will use their red violence to pass ever more laws to clamp down on free speech, the right to protest and our civil liberties.

The Marxists are the agents of Capitalism.

Their violence allows the government, which a puppet of the corporate media and globalist institutions, to pass ever more laws to remove our liberty.

We as Nationalists must resist both the Marxists and Capitalists.

This must be our strategy.

As the system collapses the Marxists will attack the state and the agents of the state.

The capitalists will assist and fund the marxists to do this in order to allow the state to pass more laws to repress the people and to ensure the control of the bankers and globalists in our countries is empowered.

Therefore we must simply allow the marxists and the state to attack each other, whilst we simply prepare to defend ourselves from any aggression from the state or the marxists.

Let the marxists attack the state and the state attack the marxists, whilst we simply keep out of the way and defend ourselves only if we are attacked.

When the state and the revolutionary marxists have caused society to undergo a collapse as they enter the street conflict stage with each other, then we must be prepared as a nationalist movement to fill the vacuum that will exist when both do so.

The vacuum will be the anger of the masses who are anti-Marxist, anti-globalist and pro-nationalist and who have been abandoned into social poverty and unemployment by the government and the state.

They will demand a Nationalist solution to their problems.

The BNP under Griffin is not that nationalist vanguard, as Griffin is just another tool of the capitalists, a man who seeks wealth and power simply for himself.

He cannot be trusted with power.

Therefore a new nationalist vanguard must be created that will fill that vacuum when it occurs and who can lead, organise and direct the revolutionary masses into a nationalist movement.

I suggest that Nationalists begin to form autonomous cells of nationalists who are prepared for the coming struggle.

These will be small groups of nationalists in new and existing nationalist groups who know and trust each other and who can work together in a group.

This will then allow them to organise and form new nationalist movements in our communities.

Then when the system collapses those nationalist vanguards can come together to form a new nationalist elite that will fill the vaccuum in their communities and society and who can then form a new mass street movement to challenge the state and its globalist / marxist / capitalist traitor lackeys.

If the BNP cannot be saved from the Griffinites, then Nationalists must not sit back and do nothing.

We must prepare for the coming collapse now.





http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/and-now-were-headed-for-the-greatest-depression-says-gerald-celente-535350.html?tickers




The fake "recovery" was nice while it lasted, says famous apocalyptic forecaster Gerald Celente, founder of the Trends Research Institute. But now the fun's over, and we're headed for what Celente describes as the "Greatest Depression."

Specifically, the always startling Celente says the country is headed for rising unemployment, poverty, and violent class warfare as the government efforts to keep the economy going begin to fail.

The crux of the problem, Celente argues, is that the middle class has been wiped out. America used to be a land of opportunity for all, where hard-working people could build their own small businesses in their own communities and live prosperous and fulfilling lives. But now a collusion of state and corporate interests that Celente describes as "fascism" have conspired to help only the biggest companies and the richest Americans. This has put a shocking amount of the country's wealth in the hands of a privileged few and left the rest of the country to subsist on chicken-feed wages and low job satisfaction as Wal-Mart "associates" -- or worse.

The answer, Celente says, is to bring back the laws that prevented huge companies from getting so big and powerful, and put some opportunity back in the hands of ordinary people. But doing that is going to take a while. And in the meantime, we're headed for trouble.






Add to Technorati Favorites

The Red Pill 2

Do not watch this video ;


http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/915.html





Al Qaeda

CIA

False Flag Terrorism




Add to Technorati Favorites

The Red Pill

Follow the link below and it has a video with the FBI agent making the claim ;



http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Ex-FBI-agent-claims-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-did-not-kill-John-F-Kennedy---SEE-VIDEO-101150699.html



A retired FBI agent has come forward with evidence that President John F. Kennedy was not killed by Lee Harvey Oswald in Dallas, Texas on Nov 22, 1963.

The Korean War veteran and retired FBI agent, Don Adams, was interviewed by a FOX 8 news reporter. He told the reporter that he worked as an FBI field agent in Thomasville, Georgia.

Adams, who is now 80-years-old, told the reporter that one of his assignments was to investigate "one of the most violent men in the country,” Joseph Milteer.

Adams had an informer who recorded a conversation with Milteer just weeks before the assassination. In the tapes the extreme right radical, with links to the KKK and States Right Party, can be heard talking about the best way to shoot the President. He say the prime location "is from an office building with a high powered rifle."

Agent Adams and his team located Milteer in Quintan, Georgia on November 27, 1963 but the Senior Agent would not allow a proper investigation.

"I said, 'Boss wait a minute, we have an opportunity to elicit tremendous information from him' and he replied 'five questions and nothing more'," said Adams.

Milteer was asked if the President was going to be assassinated. He replied "Oh yes. It's in the works."

It is Adams belief that this information should have been enough for the FBI and the Secret Service to have stop President Kennedy and his wife from travelling.

After the assassination had been carried out Milteer was "jubilant" and bragged about it. He said "You thought I was kidding when I said he would be killed from a window with a high powered rifle."

Milteer was never mentioned in the Warren Commission Report which investigated the assassination. The report from FOX 8 said "Adams suspects Milteer was definitely involved in President Kennedy's death, but he says Oswald absolutely was not."




















Add to Technorati Favorites

Friday, 20 August 2010

PC Cowards and The Bradford EDL Demonstration

It looks like the Tories and the police have decided to ban the controlled, and planned, EDL march in Bradford.

Now as we all know the police cannot stop a STATIC DEMONSTRATION by the EDL from taking place in any part of Bradford.

So what the EDL need to do now is simple - hold a series of static demonstrations all across Bradford rather than all going into one place.

The decision by the idiot Home Secratary Theresa May, a woman who is as intellectually vapid as the 'fame' she has obtained simply on the basis of her choice of shoes, has decided to surrender our liberty, civil rights and freedoms to march and protest to the politically correct coppers, politicians, UAF scum, Islamists and Islamist apologists that infest Bradford.

Note that the police will ban an EDL march but will protect Islamist filth when they want to march and abuse our troops in British streets.

What was truly sickening for me though was having to read Nick Griffins witless screed on the BNP website last week about the EDL where he attacked them as being responsible for the violence at EDL demonstrations, when as all Nationalists in the BNP know, the ONLY people that cause trouble at any Nationalist, BNP or EDL demonstration is the UAF.

By smearing the EDL and telling lies to support the UAF, Griffin has directly supported the UAF and assisted the media in telling media lies about the EDL and the UAF.

His attack on the EDL has allowed the media to now depict the UAF as some 'benign' organisation and as the victims of violence, when we all know the UAF is a collection of cowardly thugs that attack Nationalists and who then use the media lies to hide behind and blame the BNP for their violence.

How any Nationalist can say anything to support the UAF lies amazes me, but then again seeing as Griffin betrayed Jay Slaven by refusing him admission to the meeting last night in London, and Jay was the BNP security guy who saved Griffin from the UAF mob on College Green in London, then I am not amazed any more at what bilge, tripe and nonsense comes out of Griffins big mouth.

It appears that the police and politicians think they can kick the English people to the ground and they will just lie there and take it.


Heres what the EDl need to do ;

1) Each unit of the EDL organises their own rally points outside the town. Preferably from well outside Bradford and then they head into Bradford in small, unobtrusive groups. From each rally point outside Bradford the EDL groups then converge on different locations across the city and town at the same time - this way the police will not be able to contain them in one place or batter them for the media.

Use the tehcnique of Flash Mobbing to have static demonstrations all over Bradford.

The leaders of each EDL unit contact each other with text messages revealing where each flash mob rally will happen and pass them onto their own trusted activists.

As the police close down one flash mob location, then simply form another one elsewhere in the city.

To ensure total security amongst the leadership then the EDL unit leaders need to buy 'pay as you go sims' for their phones and put a tenner on them.

On the morning of the EDL demonstration, each EDL unit leader rings up the other EDL Unit leaders and each gives the other their new pay as you go mobile phone numbers.

Pass the new mobile mumbers to your lads on the day and then text them where each new flash mob is going to form in the city.

This means you can communicate with the leadership and each other and the police cannot intercept the numbers, or if they do they will not be able to react as quick as the flash mob units as they form and dissolve in the city.

Keep moving, keep having new flash mobs and as one is closed down, form another elsewhere.



2) The EDL lads need to mingle with the shoppers in the area and then form 'spontaneous' public demonstrations wherever they wish in the town centre - and the more the merrier, as the more the police realise that it is in their best interest to treat the EDL with respect in the future, and also respect their fundamental right to demonstrate, the less chance there is in the future that they will seek another idiotic and draconian ban on their marches.


3) The EDL should not organise a single joint demonstration as this is what the police want them to do - the more the EDL organises autonomous units that form random 'street flash mobs' in the area, the less chance there is of the police using their liberal fascist bully boy tactics to shut down the demonstrations.

Splintered demonstrations and flash mobs cannot be contained.



4) Remember that for all peaceful demonstrators the Video Camera is our AK47 - make sure every EDL demonstration has spotters and camera teams ready to film any police or UAF brutality.

Position people outside the demonstration area and just away from the location of the demonstrations and have them ready to film the police if they get thuggish.

The more camera footage of the police being thugs the harder it is for the media scum like The Daily Mail to peddle lies about the EDL to the readers, and as we all know most of the the readers themselves support the EDL and regard the Daily Mail journalists simply as lying politically correct scum.

Film any police brutality and load it onto Youtube yourself when you get home or send it straight to an EDL appointed webmaster and video technician so they can load the footage straight onto the EDL site.




If the EDL play this right, and show the police that banning the EDL demonstration was simply idiotic and counter productive, then the police will not do so again.

Once they have demonstrated then the EDL must leave town straight away and avoid any confrontation with the Islamists or the Far Left thugs in the UAF.

The violence will come after they leave the area when the local Islamists and their supporters will be incited into violence by the UAF.

Let the Islamists and the UAF reveal what they truly are to the people of Bradford, so they know what sort of monsters they have allowed to grow in their midst.




















Add to Technorati Favorites

Join The BNP Reform Website

The BNP Reform Website is now online here ;


http://bnpreform.com


Come and have a look and join up.


















Add to Technorati Favorites

The Shame of the BNP

The events of the meeting last night in London were shameful - not just for the BNP but also the lads in BNP security who acted as Griffins hired thugs and denied BNP members access to a BNP meeting on the say so of Griffin.

I have always been the staunchest supporter of the BNP security team.

When Warren Bennet ran the security team I always tried to get resources set aside for the team to use.

When Martin took over I did the same, demanding frequently that BNP security be funded properly and the lads looked after properly by the party.

After the College Green incident I assisted the security team to ensure they were legally protected.

After the pictures of Martin Reynolds were stolen from his computer and unlawfully leaked onto the internet, the whole of the AC wanted to kick him out of the party and I was the only one who demanded he be allowed to stay on as the leader of the security team.

Martin reynolds owes his present position solely to me, as Griffin was willing to kick him out of the security unit as the rest of the AC, and many members, were howling for him to be removed.

I put loyalty first, every time and I am most loyal to those who are prepared to take a bullet for the BNP.

Thats why I demanded Martin Reynolds be allowed to keep his job, as his loyalty to the party meant we should be loyal to him.

But the actions of BNP security last night in London have brought shame on them and the whole of the BNP.

The report below was first posted on the British Democracy forum ;

" Well well what a night! 90 people and 75% were anti Griffin/ pro Butler. Mostly London with A handfull from home counties. About 20 excluded but most got in by towing the line. Those outside were R. Edmonds, Chris Roberts, Lawrence Rustem, Rowena Savage, Peter Phillips, Bob Gertner, Steve McColl, Victoria, Eddy Butler, Sue Butler, Tony Avery, Colin Smith, Emma Colegate, Jay Slaven, a couple of ex councillors from B&D and 3 or 4 others.

Mick Barnbrook got in and managed to get his point across, but Q&As were limited because Griffin talked for an age. Meeting started 30 mins late because the access control was a drama. RE was the first to be refused entry and this nearly caused a riot. Most people calmed down in order to get themselves in.

Second to be refused was ex councillor, L. Rustem who was fuming. Colin Smith enquired why LR was denied access and was told that he couldn't attend either, simply because he enquired. This held up the smooth flow for about 5 mins as voices were raised and CS telling Geoff from Insecurity that if he was touched, a complaint would be made to the police.

Steve McColl was stopped but was a lot more complient and smiled as he turned back to the serious-looking but now quiet crowd. Sue Butler then made an attempt to enter but was simply blocked but the portly fellows in the doorway.

To be continued. "



GRIFFIN IS A MANIAC.

Here we see that anyone, and everyone is an 'Expendable' in the BNP - except for Griffin and his gollum Dowson.

The list of people denied entrance ARE THE BNP !

Griffin is just a transient leader of the party, a man who has already announced he is going to retire in four years time, yet here he is acting as if he is the party and his interests supersede those of the party and its loyal members.

Jay Slaven is the BNP security guard who rescued Griffin's during the college green incident with the UAF - he is the guy on the left of Griffin in the picture below who is pulling Griffin towards the car ;

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/gallery/2009/jun/09/bnp-european-elections?picture=348614939#/?picture=348614945&index=4

He wasnt even allowed in the meeting.

He is an ex-comrade of the BNP security team.

Thats how Griffin rewards loyalty.

The man is pure filth.

Denying Richard Edmonds access to the meeting was disgraceful - he was a founder member of the BNP and has been a member over thirty years !

Colin Smith and Lawrence Rustem ( an ex Barking councillor) are amongst the most trusted BNP activists.

Lawrence even infiltrated AFA for John Tyndall and the BNP in the 1980's when AFA were using terrorism and physically attacking BNP members so the BNP could find out who they were and where they lived.

This list of people refused access to the meeting is a list of the most trusted, skilled and loyal BNP members in London.

The fact that Griffin is now using the security lads to enforce his will against the members is shameful, both for the security team and the BNP.

Sorry lads, but you are BNP members and are supposed to be loyal to the BNP - you are not Griffins goons and loyal solely to Griffin.

Unconditional obedience to Griffin is not the duty of BNP security, the role of BNP security was set up so that they could protect the party, party officials and party meetings - BNP security was not set up to act as Griffins hired thugs and deny BNP members access to BNP meetings because Griffin has ordered it.

The actions of BNP security last night, denying BNP members access to BNP events, means the entire ethos and standing of the BNP security unit has changed - under Griffin they have been transformed into a team of hired thugs for Griffin.

That means the BNP security Unit is NO LONGER BNP SECURITY, but they are Griffins security unit.

That also means that as Griffins security, they are now actively assisting in the betrayal of the BNP, as their actions in enforcing Griffins will against loyal and long serving BNP members was not, and is not, a part of their remit as BNP security unit officers.

The BNP security Unit is an group established to defend BNP meetings and defend BNP activists at those meetings.

BNP security was not created as a hired group of thugs for Griffin - the unit is an agency of the party and serves the party.

For the security unit to choose loyalty to Griffin over loyalty to all BNP members, means they have broken their duty and loyalty to the party and its membership.

BNP securities role at last nights meeting was simple and clear - it was not to do as Griffin demanded and expel BNP members from a BNP meeting, it was too defend the building where the meeting was and protect all the BNP people at the meeting from attacks by Reds.

Every BNP member who is an up to date BNP member by law had a right to attend that meeting.

BNP security has no power under the BNP constitution to physically prevent or restrain up to date BNP members from attending a BNP event.

The constitutional position of the BNP security is simply that they are a body of the party who can do only what is lawful in English law and which does not conflict with the constitutionally protected rights of members.

The BNP constitutional position, and English case law, is that a BNP member who is an up to date BNP member cannot be refused entrance to a BNP meeting.

As a BNP member they have a right in law to attend that event.

Any order from Griffin that demands BNP security act to physically prevent up to date BNP members from accessing a BNP meeting is unlawful.

Not only were the physical removals of BNP members clearly assaults, but the role of BNP security in removing BNP members from the meeting and preventing BNP members from entering the meeting means those in the BNP security Unit who undertook those actions are all in breach of the BNP constitution for their actions and hence liable for expulsion themselves for acts of Gross Misconduct and for acts of 'Bringing the party into disrepute'.

By doing as they did last night then the lads in the BNP security crossed the line from being a lawful BNP security unit, to an illegal organisation both within the party and outside it.

Sorry lads but the actions of BNP security last night was shameful.

For you to have treated loyal and long standing BNP members as you did was disgusting.

For you to have treated Jay Slaven as you did, an old comrade of your own, was an act of disloyalty that you should be ashamed of forever.

I write this with a heavy heart, ashamed to see the BNP that I once served become a fascist cult of violence around a corrupt leader who has no honour or loyalty.























Add to Technorati Favorites