Monday 23 April 2007

Iran declares war on the West.

The Real Iranian threat.

I have read on many sites, most notably that cabal of Dhimmi-Nationalists that infest the Stormfront website, that Iran is no threat to the UK - but thats not what the Iranians think or are planning for.

Also people say that the issue in Iraq was about solely defending Israel, thats also not what the Iranians think.

Even the Iranians state that the reason the US invaded Iraq was for the Iraqi oil.

The London Arabic-language daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat reported that "an Iranian intelligence unit has established a center called The Brigades of the Shahids of the Global Islamic Awakening to replace the Iranian Revolutionary Guards' Department of Liberation and Revolutionary Movements, which had been in charge of helping and training revolutionary forces across the world." The article went on to report a speech given by an official of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, threatening the U.S. with suicide and missile attacks at already-selected sensitive targets, and threatening to "take over" Britain. The following is the report: Iran Stands Ready to Attack the West "A source close to [Revolutionary Guards] intelligence confirmed that P.R. has been appointed secretary-general of a new office that has begun registering the names of suicide volunteers to be sent to Iraq, Palestine, and Lebanon. "[The newspaper reported that it had obtained] a tape with a speech by H.A., a [Revolutionary] Guards intelligence theoretician, who teaches at the Revolutionary Guards' Al-Hussein University.

[In the tape, H.A.] spoke of Tehran's secret strategy aimed at taking over the Arab and Muslim countries by means of helping revolutionary forces and organizations. H.A. is regarded as one of the advisors of a branch in the organization, and has published a number of works on exporting the [Islamic] revolution and the method of the struggle against the world arrogance [i.e., the U.S.].

"In his speech at a secret conference attended by students who are members of the Ansar Hizbullah movement at Al-Hussein University, [H.A. said]: 'Iraqi oil constitutes 11% of the world oil reserves, and it has fallen into the hands of the U.S. and Britain. The value of the intelligence documents that the U.S. obtained because of its takeover of Iraqi intelligence is greater than $1000 billion. Whereas our [Iran's] Foreign Ministry was expressing willingness to reconstruct the statue of the Buddha [destroyed by the Taliban in 2001] in Afghanistan – that is, to build an idol, which is an act that is against the principles of Islam – the U.S. managed to force its rule on Afghanistan.

"'Haven't the Jews and the Christians achieved their progress by means of toughness and repression? We have a strategy drawn up for the destruction of Anglo-Saxon civilization and for the uprooting of the Americans and the English. "'Our missiles are now ready to strike at their civilization, and as soon as the instructions arrive from Leader ['Ali Khamenei], we will launch our missiles at their cities and installations.

Our motto during the war (in Iraq) was: Karbala, we are coming, Jerusalem, we are coming. And because of Khatami's policies and dialogue between the civilizations, we have been compelled to freeze our plan to liberate the Islamic cities. And now we are [again] about to carry out the program.'

"In his speech, he added: 'The global infidel front is a front against Allah and the Muslims, and we must make use of everything we have at hand to strike at this front, by means of our suicide operations or by means of our missiles. There are 29 sensitive sites in the U.S. and in the West. We have already spied on these sites and we know how we are going to attack them.' "In another part of his speech, he emphasized, 'If Israel dares attack the [nuclear] installations at Bushehr, our losses will be very low, because [only] one structure will be destroyed – while we [i.e., Iran] have means of attacking Israel's nuclear facilities and arsenals such that no trace of Israel will remain.'"

"We do not want to take over the British Embassy, since [the British] have already cleared the embassy of documents; we must take over Britain [itself]," he said.

A report on May 28 in Al-Sharq Al-Awsat reported that an Iranian intelligence unit has established a center called "The Brigades of the Shahids of the Global Islamic Awakening."The paper claimed that it had obtained a tape with a speech by Hassan Abbassi, a Revolutionary Guards intelligence theoretician who teaches at Al-Hussein University. In the tape, Mr. Abbassi spoke of Tehran's secret plans, which include "a strategy drawn up for the destruction of Anglo-Saxon civilization." In order to accomplish this, he explained, "There are 29 sensitive sites in the U.S. and in the West. We have already spied on these sites and we know how we are going to attack them."

It was reported that America expelled two Iranian security guards employed by Tehran's U.N. offices on June 29, after the mission was repeatedly warned against allowing its guards to videotape bridges, the Statue of Liberty, and New York's subway system.This was the third time the Iranians have been caught in such activities, which could be connected to the sites mentioned in potential plans to attack America.

Another example of Irans war against the UK is the technology and training they have given to Shiite insurgents in Iraq that have allowed them to build shaped explosive charges used as IED's that have kiled scores of British and US troops.

Another example is the use of .50 calibre sniper rifles sold to Iran by Austria that are being used to kill US and British troops.

Iranian troops have also been caught training insurgents.

There is a word for those so called Nationalists that support Iran. That word is TRAITOR.

IRAN IS AT WAR WITH US. They are killing British troops in Iraq and attacking British troops in international waters. They are preparing to attack the UK with terrorists and suicide bombers and building a nuclear arsenal that they have admitted they will use against us.

Those that give support to the enemy in a time of war are traitors and deserve only a traitors fate, and left to rot upon the gallows.

As a result of the threats from Iran to attack sensitive UK installations, then we must presume Iranian targets include Nuclear Power Plants and the Tube, that would devastate the UK.

If Iran is serious about attacking the UK, and Hassan Abbasi is their main strategist and ideological thinker, then we must presume that an attack WILL occur at some point. If the strategy of Iran is to fight for the development of a GLOBAL Caliphate, then the threat to Anglo-Saxon civilisation is real and the threat to destroy the UK IS REAL.

Therefore we must now begin the immediate withdrawal of UK troops from Iraq and Afghanistan and all other overseas postings.

The threat from the Taliban trained terrorists in the Uk can be dealt with by deportation, internment and execution for those convicted of plotting terrorism in UK territory. If terrorist training camps are established in Afghanistan in the future and British citizens attend those camps then we must allow the Afghanistan government the right to execute them for involvement in terrorism in their own country. If we find out who they are then when they return to the UK then they must be executed.

Uk troops must immediately be returned from all overseas posting around the world and the UK borders sealed off by the British Army and all potential target sites given round the clock armed military guards.

We also must seal the UK borders and install the British army to protect potential Iranian targets in the UK in the event of an unannounced and unforseen joint US and Israel attack on Iran.

The fact that the Iranians have broadcast their intention to attack the UK in the event of an US and Israel attack on Iran means we must deploy British troops in the UK right now in the event of an escalation from either of the sides.

For more information on Dr.Hassan Abbasi please read the following Wikipedia entry ;

Note in particular the ' Waiting Out Bush ' theory and also the 'Last Helicopter' theory and the implications for the planet of a future Democrat government led by Hilary Clinton with an Islamic extremist appeasement policy.

Whilst the determination of the West to confront those that seek its downfall wanes, the power of Islamic Fundamentalism rises.


Claire Khaw said...

Hello Lee

I thought you might like to have a look at my blog

or even join my politics website

There are links to the discussion groups I am active in if you go to my blog,

eg on ethnicity and identity, the EU, lower taxes or the welfare state, what Conservatism is, which may be of interest to the British Nationalist.

Claire Khaw said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Claire Khaw said...


This Group would have been called "Race and Nation" but it seems this would attract accusations of racism and fascism!

Do we all have the right to complain about foreigners without being accused of racism? Or not? Does it matter that racism now has a very subjective definition of perceived offensiveness?

A foreigner these days has the same difficulties of definition as the Christian conundrum of who is our neighbour whom we are supposed to love. In the old days they were simply called "aliens" by officials. Now, in our time of international travel even the term "foreigner" is considered rude.

It is suggested that nationality is a matter of fact and of which passport(s) one holds. Ethnicity is how we appear to others. The police identification code system could be very helpful, allowing us to call English whoever is British, residing in England and speaking with one of the English accents and when relevant their physical characteristics denoted using IC1 for someone of Caucasian appearance, IC2 for Mediterranean, IC3 for Afro-Caribbean, IC4 for Asian, IC5 for Oriental, IC6 for Arabian and Egyptian. Their political and religious affiliations are after all only knowable after an in depth conversation, and are predictably subject to unpredictable change.

As for identity, well, we sometimes feel we belong and other times not. Other times people feel we are one of them and then cast us out for daring to be different. This, being purely subjective and changeable, we will leave for the individual and the perceiver of that individual to decide as and when required.

Racism, is of course another topic that desperately needs to be discussed, and is not to be confused with xenophobia -a hatred or dislike of outsiders. Racism at its narrowest means the attribution of superiority or inferiority to someone solely on grounds of race, not just being rude about someone of another race or on grounds of race! for polls on race relations

Defender of Liberty said...

Hi Andromeda,

I have just started updating the blog and will take a look ASAP. All the best.

Defender of Liberty said...

Those that say Iran

From The Sunday TimesSeptember 16, 2007

Israelis ‘blew apart Syrian nuclear cache’

Secret raid on Korean shipmentUzi Mahnaimi in Tel Aviv, Sarah Baxter in Washington and Michael Sheridan

IT was just after midnight when the 69th Squadron of Israeli F15Is crossed the Syrian coast-line. On the ground, Syria’s formidable air defences went dead. An audacious raid on a Syrian target 50 miles from the Iraqi border was under way.

At a rendezvous point on the ground, a Shaldag air force commando team was waiting to direct their laser beams at the target for the approaching jets. The team had arrived a day earlier, taking up position near a large underground depot. Soon the bunkers were in flames.

Ten days after the jets reached home, their mission was the focus of intense speculation this weekend amid claims that Israel believed it had destroyed a cache of nuclear materials from North Korea.

The Israeli government was not saying. “The security sources and IDF [Israeli Defence Forces] soldiers are demonstrating unusual courage,” said Ehud Olmert, the prime minister. “We naturally cannot always show the public our cards.”

Related Links
A tale of two dictatorships: The links between North Korea and Syria
The Syrians were also keeping mum. “I cannot reveal the details,” said Farouk al-Sharaa, the vice-president. “All I can say is the military and political echelon is looking into a series of responses as we speak. Results are forthcoming.” The official story that the target comprised weapons destined for Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed Lebanese Shi’ite group, appeared to be crumbling in the face of widespread scepticism.

Andrew Semmel, a senior US State Department official, said Syria might have obtained nuclear equipment from “secret suppliers”, and added that there were a “number of foreign technicians” in the country.

Asked if they could be North Korean, he replied: “There are North Korean people there. There’s no question about that.” He said a network run by AQ Khan, the disgraced creator of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons, could be involved.

But why would nuclear material be in Syria? Known to have chemical weapons, was it seeking to bolster its arsenal with something even more deadly?

Alternatively, could it be hiding equipment for North Korea, enabling Kim Jong-il to pretend to be giving up his nuclear programme in exchange for economic aid? Or was the material bound for Iran, as some authorities in America suggest?

According to Israeli sources, preparations for the attack had been going on since late spring, when Meir Dagan, the head of Mossad, presented Olmert with evidence that Syria was seeking to buy a nuclear device from North Korea.

The Israeli spy chief apparently feared such a device could eventually be installed on North-Korean-made Scud-C missiles.

“This was supposed to be a devastating Syrian surprise for Israel,” said an Israeli source. “We’ve known for a long time that Syria has deadly chemical warheads on its Scuds, but Israel can’t live with a nuclear warhead.”

An expert on the Middle East, who has spoken to Israeli participants in the raid, told yesterday’s Washington Post that the timing of the raid on September 6 appeared to be linked to the arrival three days earlier of a ship carrying North Korean material labelled as cement but suspected of concealing nuclear equipment.

The target was identified as a northern Syrian facility that purported to be an agricultural research centre on the Euphrates river. Israel had been monitoring it for some time, concerned that it was being used to extract uranium from phosphates.

According to an Israeli air force source, the Israeli satellite Ofek 7, launched in June, was diverted from Iran to Syria. It sent out high-quality images of a northeastern area every 90 minutes, making it easy for air force specialists to spot the facility.

Early in the summer Ehud Barak, the defence minister, had given the order to double Israeli forces on its Golan Heights border with Syria in anticipation of possible retaliation by Damascus in the event of air strikes.

Sergei Kirpichenko, the Russian ambassador to Syria, warned President Bashar al-Assad last month that Israel was planning an attack, but suggested the target was the Golan Heights.

Israeli military intelligence sources claim Syrian special forces moved towards the Israeli outpost of Mount Hermon on the Golan Heights. Tension rose, but nobody knew why.

At this point, Barak feared events could spiral out of control. The decision was taken to reduce the number of Israeli troops on the Golan Heights and tell Damascus the tension was over. Syria relaxed its guard shortly before the Israeli Defence Forces struck.

Only three Israeli cabinet ministers are said to have been in the know � Olmert, Barak and Tzipi Livni, the foreign minister. America was also consulted. According to Israeli sources, American air force codes were given to the Israeli air force attaché in Washington to ensure Israel’s F15Is would not mistakenly attack their US counterparts.

Once the mission was under way, Israel imposed draconian military censorship and no news of the operation emerged until Syria complained that Israeli aircraft had violated its airspace. Syria claimed its air defences had engaged the planes, forcing them to drop fuel tanks to lighten their loads as they fled.

But intelligence sources suggested it was a highly successful Israeli raid on nuclear material supplied by North Korea.

Washington was rife with speculation last week about the precise nature of the operation. One source said the air strikes were a diversion for a daring Israeli commando raid, in which nuclear materials were intercepted en route to Iran and hauled to Israel. Others claimed they were destroyed in the attack.

There is no doubt, however, that North Korea is accused of nuclear cooperation with Syria, helped by AQ Khan’s network. John Bolton, who was undersecretary for arms control at the State Department, told the United Nations in 2004 the Pakistani nuclear scientist had “several other” customers besides Iran, Libya and North Korea.

Some of his evidence came from the CIA, which had reported to Congress that it viewed “Syrian nuclear intentions with growing concern”.

“I’ve been worried for some time about North Korea and Iran outsourcing their nuclear programmes,” Bolton said last week. Syria, he added, was a member of a “junior axis of evil”, with a well-established ambition to develop weapons of mass destruction.

The links between Syria and North Korea date back to the rule of Kim Il-sung and President Hafez al-Assad in the last century. In recent months, their sons have quietly ordered an increase in military and technical cooperation.

Foreign diplomats who follow North Korean affairs are taking note. There were reports of Syrian passengers on flights from Beijing to Pyongyang and sightings of Middle Eastern businessmen from sources who watch the trains from North Korea to China.

On August 14, Rim Kyong Man, the North Korean foreign trade minister, was in Syria to sign a protocol on “cooperation in trade and science and technology”. No details were released, but it caught Israel’s attention.

Syria possesses between 60 and 120 Scud-C missiles, which it has bought from North Korea over the past 15 years. Diplomats believe North Korean engineers have been working on extending their 300-mile range. It means they can be used in the deserts of northeastern Syria � the area of the Israeli strike.

The triangular relationship between North Korea, Syria and Iran continues to perplex intelligence analysts. Syria served as a conduit for the transport to Iran of an estimated £50m of missile components and technology sent by sea from North Korea. The same route may be in use for nuclear equipment.

But North Korea is at a sensitive stage of negotiations to end its nuclear programme in exchange for security guarantees and aid, leading some diplomats to cast doubt on the likelihood that Kim would cross America’s “red line” forbidding the proliferation of nuclear materials.

Christopher Hill, the State Department official representing America in the talks, said on Friday he could not confirm “intelligence-type things”, but the reports underscored the need “to make sure the North Koreans get out of the nuclear business”.

By its actions, Israel showed it is not interested in waiting for diplomacy to work where nuclear weapons are at stake.

As a bonus, the Israelis proved they could penetrate the Syrian air defence system, which is stronger than the one protecting Iranian nuclear sites.

This weekend President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran sent Ali Akbar Mehrabian, his nephew, to Syria to assess the damage. The new “axis of evil” may have lost one of its spokes.