The Positive Discrimination President

Obama is worse than useless.

You all know it.

You voted for him not because of his skills or the content of his character but simply because he was black and because the media told you that if you didnt vote for him then you were a racist.

And you suckers fell for it.

Obama is a glimpse of the future, a prefiguration of the inevitability of the death of the West from the pernicious infections of Political Correctness and Positive Discrimination.

Americans were faced with a choice - a President who had decades of political experience at all levels of politics but who was white or one who had virtually no political experience but who was black.

America therefore opted for Positive Discrimination - they chose to give the less qualified candidate the job simply because he was black and by so doing signed the death warrant for America's future.

Do you liberal morons really think that in China they give a toss about Positive Discrimination - of course they dont.

In National Socialist China they have only one aim for their society - the most brilliant get given the best jobs.

Whilst in the West what happens is that the less qualified, the less skilled and the less intelligent are given jobs simply because of their race. The better qualified if they are the of the wrong race dont get the job.

At the moment we have Affirmative Action where if two equally qualified people apply for a job then the Non-White gets it simply because they are not White, but the Equality Bill legalises Positive Discrimination where the less qualified non-white will be given the job instead of the better qualified White.

Though this has been happening informally for decades, where the less qualified Non-White are being goven jobs so that the employer can demonstrate their anti-racist and politically correct credentials or apply for lucrative contracts with councils that demand quoatas be filled as regards non-whites - the Equality Bill will allow Positive Discrimination to be legalised and in effect create an Anti-White Racist state.

It is no coincidence that the same Equality Bill enacts legislation that will seek to ban the BNP, the one organisation in our country that represents the interests of the White indigenous community and that seeks to prevent politically correct racism against indigenous whites, at the same time as it legalises Positive Discrimination.

The Equality Bill is a declaration of war against us. It is the creation of a Liberal Fascist State and it must be resisted.

The idea that recruiting less qualified non-whites and leaving better qualified Whites on the dole will increase racial harmony is insane. As soon as people start dying because less qualified non-whites are getting jobs not on merit but simply because of their race then the faster the whole PC state system will collapse.

How do you think this insanity will affect the West in the future when we have idiots running the country simply because their skin tone dictated their ability to get employment ?

It is just so ironic that within one generation we have gone from a situation where skin colour damaged a persons employment ability to one where skin tone is now the primary basis for an individuals employment - and in the process we have abandoned talent, qualifications and individualism for a politically correct system which is even more pernicious than the old 'nudge, nudge wink, wink' type of informal racism.

The old style of informal racism was usually the preserve of pathetic venal people who knew what they were doing was wrong and illegal but they did it anyway, whilst now the New Racism is state sanctioned and legalised and regarded with almost moral fervour.

The New Racism is explictly racist and has legalised every form of racism that it once frowned upon - in the name of 'equality' it has imposed Positive Discrimination and quotas, both of which are the most de-humanising racist dynamics present in our society today.

The New Racism doesnt see individuals it only see's races and thereby legitimises race hatred against whites.

If you are white male in this country you are now in a far worse position than any black male in British history - primarily because whilst previous forms of racism were shunned by most of society and illegal, the New Racism is legal, accepted by the mass of society and because it is based on the terrorism of the word 'racist' being deployed against anyone that dares point out the innate racism of the New Racism, goes unchallenged in the media and society generally.

Positive Discrimination is the most evil and insidious form of racism ever invented.

It is based on lies and deceits, and yet anyone daring to question it is instantly designated a racist.

Positive Discrimination in effect states that our entire society is racist and everyone everywhere who is white is racist and that therefore a racist anti-white state must be built which removes the civil and legal rights of white people to ensure that blacks and other privileged groups are able to take extra rights for themselves.

Positive Discrmination says that white people, who are the majority in Britain and America, have their jobs not because of their individual skills and talents but simply because they are white. It also says that the reason why blacks and other non-white groups are not 'represented' in proportion to their numbers in the overall population in any employment sector is because of racism - regardless of the fact that those jobs may be in areas of the employment sector that have traditionally may not have attracted members of those non-white groups.

At every level the White population are attacked and denigrated and excuses made for those who are not white - and in order to rectify this 'racist' imbalance then better qualified non-whites must be employed instead of better qualified Whites.

China must be laughing its bollocks off.

The more the West indulges in the suicidal death cults of Political Correctness and positive discrimination the faster it is about to fall.

China and those nations such as Russia that have lived through this trite Communist nonsense, as both Political Correctness and Positive Discrimination are both relics of the 20th Century Communist ideology, reject them in their entirety.

In both those countries they have built meritocracies where the issue of race is totally irrelevant - what matters is simply that the best and the brightest are promoted to the best jobs so the whole country benefits.

China and Russia regard political correctness and positive discrimination with the utter loathing and contempt it deserves - for both are nations predicated upon NATIONALIST politics.

Russia is a civic nationalist system predicated upon patriotism and meritocracy, whilst China is a National Socialist State predicated upon patriotism.

Only in the West has the ghost of Communism been allowed to haunt contemporary politics in the guise of political correctness and positive discrimination.

In those nations like Russia and China the entire Communist ideology has been exorcised completely - both may retain the symbols of Communism but both are Nationalist states.

Here in the West we retain the symbols of Nationalism for our states such as the national flags we wave for sports events (if the local councils are able to resist the fear of being called 'racist' when they do fly the national flag) but we are run by variants of liberalism and capitalism that are infected with the poison of Communism itself.

Obama is a glimpe of the future.

A man voted into power not because of the content of his character but simply because of the colour of his skin.

A man voted into power by the most racist vote in history - the black vote that was 96 % for Obama. Just imagine the howls of racism if whites voted as a racial block.

A man who is incapable of doing anything other than reading a teleprompter whose words were written for him ( and for doing this he is celebrated as a great orator by the white morons that run the media - even though a White man writes most of his speeches and all Obama has to do is read them, which he fails to do very often and then when the teleprompter breaks he is utterly lost ).

The West deserves all it gets.

The faster the fools that run the West destroy the West the better.

That way we, the inner barbarians who are despised by the liberals and leftists who are in the grip of their cults of political correctness and positive discrmination, can take power in the ensuing chaos with a mandate for radical change.

The faster the West implodes and collapses the sooner we can start to rebuild the West from within.

The sooner the idiot masses have their illusions ripped away from them and they are forced to confront cold, hard reality the better.

The day the West dies, is the day its rebirth begins.

Obama, The Taliban and WW3

Obama is the puppet of Israel and AIPAC.

Therefore his foreign policy is Israels foreign policy.

The first announcement that Obama made when he became president was that he would send thousands more US troops in to Afghanistan and then demanded the UK Zionist puppet Brown did the same.

The plan is now clear.

The 'surge' of troops into Afghanistan was not designed to defeat the Taliban in Afghanistan - the aim of the recent massive troop deployments into Afghanistan was designed to drive the Taliban DEEPER INTO PAKISTAN.

It was obvious to everyone that deprived of ground in Afghanistan the Taliban would drive deeper into Pakistan.

First they took the Swat Valley with the blessing of Pakistan government and now they have a base in Pakistan they are now spreading deeper into Pakistan itself - and they are now less than 60 miles from Islamabada the capital city.

The Obama plan has always been this ;

1) Destabilise Pakistan

2) Force the Taliban into Pakistan to start a civil war in Pakistan

3) This civil war will then allow the US to enter Pakistan and secure Pakistans nuclear weapons

4) US troops will be parachuted into Pakistan to secure the military installations that hold the nuclear weapons and secure them or remove them


This plan is now becoming obvious.

The plan was never to defeat the Taliban - a bunch of well armed goat herders - the plan from the beginning was to secure Pakistans nuclear weapons.

The Taliban were always sponsored by the ISI and Pakistani army and by confronting the Islamists in Afghanistan this would cause chaos in Pakistan and allow the US to enter the country and take the nuclear weapons.

The fruits of this plan could be WW3 for if the Americans fail to secure the weapons then thousands of US troops may die in the attempt and leave the Taliban with the weapons in their hands.

Pakistan will be torn apart by civil war as the Pakistani nationalists wage war against the Islamists that want Pakistan to be another part of the global caliphate.

Yet again the Zionist agenda dominates US foreign policy and threatens world peace.

The war drums are already being beaten by Clinton and the Zionist media in the UK and US ;


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/clinton-says-pakistan-poses-mortal-threat-1672927.html


Clinton says Pakistan poses 'mortal threat'

By Arshad Mohammed, Reuters


Thursday, 23 April 2009
Share Digg It del.icio.us Facebook Reddit Print Article Email Article Text Size
NormalLargeExtra Large
Pakistan's government has abdicated to the Taliban in agreeing to impose Islamic law in the Swat valley and the country now poses a "mortal threat" to the world, the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said.


Surging violence across Pakistan and the spread of Taliban influence through its northwest are reviving concerns about the stability of the nuclear-armed country, an important US ally vital to efforts to stabilize neighboring Afghanistan.

US President Barack Obama, who on March 27 unveiled a new strategy that seeks to crush al-Qa'ida and Taliban militants in Afghanistan and those operating from across the border in Pakistan, meets the presidents of both countries May 6-7.

The talks illustrate US anxiety that Afghanistan could again become a haven for al-Qa'ida militants to launch foreign attacks more than seven years after US-led forces toppled the Afghan Taliban regime that sheltered the Sept. 11 attackers.

Speaking to US lawmakers, Clinton said the Pakistani government had to provide basic services to its people or risk seeing the Taliban, and other extremists, fill the vacuum.

Under pressure from conservatives, Zardari earlier this month signed a regulation imposing Islamic law in Swat, a northwestern valley once one of Pakistan's most popular tourist destinations.

Asked about the matter, Clinton bluntly replied: "I think that the Pakistani government is basically abdicating to the Taliban and to the extremists."

Speaking before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Clinton said, ominously, that the situation in Pakistan "poses a mortal threat to the security and safety of our country and the world."

Swat was a major tourist spot until 2007, when militants infiltrated the valley from strongholds on the Afghan border to the west in support of a radical cleric.

After inconclusive military offensives and a failed peace agreement, Pakistani authorities accepted an Islamist demand for sharia, or Islamic law, in February.

Teresita Schaffer, a former US diplomat who served in Pakistan and now heads the South Asia program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank in Washington, said many analysts share Clinton's assessment.

"There is deep concern in the US government, and elsewhere in this country, about the implications of the deal in Swat," Schaffer said. "It represents a cession of state authority to people who have been slitting the throats of policemen in the public square."

Schaffer said she did not believe Clinton viewed the Pakistani state itself as a mortal threat.

Rather, she said Clinton may have been suggesting that events in the country, where militants are believed to have plotted foreign attacks and set off a series of domestic suicide bombings in the last month, threaten other nations.

The White House says the May 6-7 talks between Obama, Karzai and Zardari will include a three-way meeting. The talks represent the US president's effort to ease tensions and forge more cooperation between the two countries.

Kabul has accused Islamabad of not doing enough to stop militants crossing the border to launch attacks in Afghanistan. However, ties have improved under Zardari, whose country is facing its own Islamist insurgency.

Obama has authorized the deployment of 21,000 additional US troops and hundreds of new diplomatic and other civilian officials to Afghanistan to try to quell the Taliban insurgency in the south and the east of that country.

A senior US commander said US and NATO forces were close to achieving "irreversible momentum" in their battle with insurgents in eastern Afghanistan, saying this was partly due to an influx of some 4,000 US troops to the area this year.

Hats Off To Obama

The one area of policy that President Obama has to be congratulated on is his vision of an energy independent United States.

Though of course the first President to promise that the US would be energy independent was Nixon and then he was followed by Carter.

Neither did what they said they would.

Therefore if Obama can achieve this vision, then that alone would make him rightfully one of the greatest Presidents of American history, based on what he actually does and not his racial ancestry.

Though of course he will not be able to do what he says he wants to do as the power of the President is based on him cosying up to the big banks, the oil companies and the Israel lobby who all demand the US stays addicted to Middle East oil.



http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/camilla_cavendish/article5671343.ece

From The TimesFebruary 6, 2009

Obama surges ahead in the race to be green

The President's bold speech on renewable energy has thrown down the gauntlet to the rest of the world's leaders

The green race is on. Did you notice? Barack Obama fired the starting gun a week ago, but most Europeans were looking the other way. Ed Miliband, the Climate Change Secretary, is on the track, but has no one to hand his baton to - his colleagues in the Government are off expanding Heathrow and coal power. Coming up behind him are people who saw dollar signs flashing in President Obama's strident words about oil last week.

Going low-carbon is no longer a seminar subject for caring greens. It's a real live competition to beat the oil regimes and make profits, in which the new environmentalists will be alpha males.

The President's speech was astonishing. “America will not be held hostage to dwindling resources, hostile regimes and a warming planet,” he said, on his sixth day in office. The US would no longer “bankroll dictators” but would create its own energy from the Sun, wind and soil. Unchecked climate change would lead to “violent conflict, terrible storms and irreversible catastrophe”. It was wrong to deny the science, he said. It was wrong to think that clean energy would damage prosperity. This was not the lukewarm language of appeasement, aimed at the green lobby. It was the language of wartime: a declaration of war on fossil fuels.

In one week America has gone from playing the dirty, recalcitrant schoolboy to auditioning as the world leader on climate change. That's quite a shift. And it has indicated to every energy investor and green entrepreneur that America is now the place to do business.

BP and Shell have abandoned their investments in renewable energy in Britain, in favour of the United States. The German power company e.on is close to pulling out of the London Array, Britain's biggest experiment in wind power. Even the Bush Administration operated a more attractive regime of subsidies for renewables than Britain. Now the world has a White House that will invest and regulate on an unprecedented scale.

The first two executive orders signed by the President were, he said, a “downpayment” towards the green economy. One tightened fuel-efficiency standards for cars, an issue once thought to be politically untouchable. The other gave permission to states to move faster than the Federal Government. This was a triumph for Arnold Schwarzenegger, many of whose attempts to green California have been frustrated by George W. Bush. President Obama seems determined that Washington will not stand in the way of innovation. He is colour-blind: it doesn't matter whether you're from a red or a blue state if you're green.

No country rises to a challenge like America. In the 1990s the US cap-and-trade scheme to limit acid rain worked far more quickly and cheaply than expected because, once companies saw the writing on the wall, they stopped moaning and invented clever alternatives.

Today 23 states have their own cap-and-trade schemes for capping carbon emissions. It will not be a huge step to take that national. Even the Republican Governor of Texas is proposing a $5,000 subsidy for his citizens who buy electric hybrid cars. President Obama faces an almighty fight over his stimulus package, which contains $90 billion of clean energy investments. But he is clearly determined to unleash a “big bang” that will change the energy game fundamentally.

For several years, I have been talking to investors and entrepreneurs who have been waiting for this moment. They want to grab some of the $16 trillion that the International Energy Agency thinks will be invested in energy infrastructure between now and 2030. They know that the low-carbon market could grow very fast.

It is no accident that some of the earliest clean-tech investors, such as Paul Allen, of Microsoft, and Vinod Khosla, of Sun, are dot-com billionaires. They remember how quickly fortunes were built when a critical mass of consumers suddenly shifted online. They know that canal barges ran out of customers long before they ran out of canals.

California has effectively outlawed the building of new fossil fuel plants. If the rest of the US follows suit, the big oil companies will have to move rapidly or risk running out of customers for their ageing infrastructure.

There is a long way to go. But what is particularly impressive about President Obama is his determination in the face of public apathy. By pressing the issue early and hard, he is showing true leadership. He wants to make insulated homes, clean technologies and connecting infrastructure a fait accompli. The risk for European politicians is that their own faltering steps will soon be outpaced. The EU carbon market is failing because its politicians speak green but keep shoring up old-fashioned industries.

Only one European leader seems to understand the need to unleash a “big bang”. Two weeks ago David Cameron launched an ambitious strategy for making Britain a low-carbon economy. It has put the Conservative Party way ahead of the field. While Labour writhes in the stranglehold of vested interests in the aviation and fossil fuel industries, the Tories, who are less naive about business, have plans to decentralise energy supply, invest properly in carbon capture, develop marine power and offshore wind, insulate all homes and build an “electricity internet” to help suppliers to make much more finely tuned decisions.

It is a big vision. It understands the need to offer the public what Mr Cameron calls the “holy trinity” of cheap, secure, low-carbon energy supplies. It also understands - which the Government does not - that Britain has very little time left to gain a commercial advantage in the clean energy field. There will be no prizes for coming third in a race in which the US is setting the pace