Musings of a Durotrigan - My Response

This is my response to the article below ;



http://durotrigan.blogspot.com/2011/10/nationalism-and-counterjihad-new-party.html#comment-form



In February, I suggested that the best ideological fit with the EDL seemed to be the recently formed British Freedom Party (BFP), but after making such a suggestion on the Gates of Vienna blog, it was made clear to me that the Counterjihad movement could not take the BFP seriously because of the oft-recorded rants of leading founder BFP member Lee Barnes. Although Barnes sometimes forwards some excellent ideas, he is unfortunately prone to posting some frankly bizarre material on his 21st Century British Nationalism blog pertaining to conspiracy theories (Zionist NWO being the most-frequently commented upon) and syncretistic ‘spirituality’ encompassing a wide range of pagan and New Age elements, including the Mayan Calendar 2012 Doomsday ‘prophecy’. This latter-day champion of an anti-Zionist Blakeian mysticism, it was suggested, should continue to commune with the angels in the trees at the bottom of his garden rather than become a leading figure in a viable nationalist party.









I have tried to post these comments below on the Durotrigan site but for some reason appear unable to do so due to the comments software.


I have been reading your blog for a while, thought the time had come to comment as this article mentions me.

I shall answer each point one at a time.


1) Can you tell me why the 'counter-jihad movement' thinks that support of Zionism is any way relevant to the struggle against Islamism ?

No, nor can I.


The struggle against Islamism is not predicated on us counter-jihadists being subservient to Zionism - in fact the primary reason why the counter jihad movement and nationalist movements of European nations have been so damaged as per their political / social development over recent years is primarily due to attacks on the counter-jihad movement by organised Jewish and Zionist groups whose interests in the counter-jihad movement appear focused primarily in relation to their own, and Israels interests, not the interests of our peoples or our nations.

The endless throwing of the word and phrases 'Racism, racist and anti-semitic' against any nationalist organisation that does not abase itself before the self appointed Lords of Zionism , has led to the undermining of the counter-jihad struggle itself.

If the Zionists think the only counter-jihad struggle they will tolerate is one that primarily serves them, then they are either mad or power crazed. Either way they are living in cloud cuckoo land.

The irony that these Zionists support Israel being a 'Jewish state' is lost on them.

It appears that whilst a 'Jewish' state is acceptable to them, anyone who dares demand Britain is a British state that serves the British people, not the demands of the Zionists, is unacceptable.

Such chutzpah is not just hypocritical, it is sickening.

The idea that we as a nation must resist Islamism but surrender to the demands of a tiny number of arrogant Zionists with their own political agenda before we can be 'acceptable' to the Zionists or the counter-jihad movement is the very antithesis of British Nationalism.

If Zionists want to run Israel then good for them, but dont ever think they will be allowed to run Britain.

We dont intend to remove the Islamists and thereby allow the Zionists to run Britain.



2) It appears that support for Zionist terrorism, Zionist terrorist groups, Zionist terrorists or Zionist supporting terrorists like Anders Brievik is no bar to being accepted into the club of the Zionists counter jihadists, but a British Nationalist who supports the right of Israel to exist as a nation, but who doesnt genuflect before the dictates of Zionism or Zionists, apparently is.

With that sort of logic we can see we are dealing with a bunch of cranks who seem to think that their loyalty to Zionism means more than defeating Islamist terrorism.

That sort of effete, precious, country club mentality is the curse of the counter Jihad movement - the movement itself seems to think that loyalty to Zionism is more important than having activists and a movement that can actually DEAL with the Islamists.

As I said, such self serving hobbyists are the curse of the counter-jihad movement.




3) The fact that the counter-jihad movement does not seem to realise that we have at most ten years to establish and build a real and effective counter jihad movement in Britain before the demographics issue alone make this almost impossible means that they think they have the time to obsess on forming a club of zionist friendly lackeys.

They dont.

Though the Zionist cliques in America and Europe may be safe, our people in Britain arent.

Therefore I suggest that rather than thinking they can define OUR MOVEMENT for us, they butt out and concentrate on building their own.



4) My support for Marijuana reform is based on supporting the same medical marijuana licensed outlets as in America in order to help those people with chronic illnesses. I suggest those that are unaware of the licensed medical marijuana dispensaries in America do the research on them. When you have worked with people who have MS and whose lives have been transformed by medical marijuana like I have, then lecture me on the issue of Marijuana.

If you havent, butt out.



5) As for my study of new age religions, I study all religions - if being an ignorant, materialist and atheist are requirements for being in the counter-jihad country club - then show me where it is written on the application form.

I suspect that this is another example of the 'precious' nature of the hobbyists who think they can dictate what the counter-jihad movement should be doing and where it needs to be going.

When these self appointed 'experts' get off the internet and do some work for the movement in the real world, then I will be impressed.


But they never do, do they.


The fact that I study religions makes me similar to all those in the Jewish / Christian faith who study their own religions.

If I cant study religions as that makes me a bit of a 'crank' I wonder what that makes the Pope, Priests or Rabbi's ?

Are all religious people cranks, or just me ?

As for me studying William Blake, if studying one of the greatest British poets makes me 'crank', then so be it.



So lets be honest shall we - parts of the counter-jihad movement seem to think that what matters is not intelligence, talent, political or legal skills, dedication to the anti-Islamist movement or even the ability to organise a movement that matters.


Oh no, what matters it appears is that one must abase oneself before Zionists and the ideology of Zionism before one is acceptable to the Zionist counter-jihadist country club clique.

This is hobbyism at its worst.

How dare a tiny clique of Zionist extremists seek to hijack the counter-jihad movement in the UK for their own purposes and benefit.


The UK counter-jihad movement needs to adress one issue - ISLAMISM.


If anyone thinks Nationalists will support, work with or vote for a party that abases itself before Zionism, then you are delusional.


Nationalists do not want any political party / movement they support to be run / controlled / influenced by a tiny shadowy clique of self serving extremists who put their own interests before our nation and people.


Our people are dying in the streets from Islamist bombs and terrorism.


Sooner or later the small self serving cliques that think they can control the nationalist movement for their own benefit will invite their own nemesis as a result of such hubris.


The fact the EDL has already split down the middle due to the issue of the EDL's unconditional support for Zionism, and allowing Zionist extremists to take leading roles in the EDL, shows us that nationalists are already sick of this Zionist clique seeking to control the anti-Islamist movement.

The fact that the EDL and NWI are now effectively at each others throats is as a direct result of Zionism.

I suggest that from now on the anti-jihad movement concentrate on one issue - resisting Islamism.

That way such schisms wont occur again and damage the development of the counter-jihad movement itself.


Its time for the counter-jihad movement to focus one one issue and one issue only - RESISTING ISLAMISM - and that way we can get on with the job at hand, which is saving our country and people from the existential threat that Islamism poses to our nation and Western Civilisation.


Regards,


L. J. Barnes LLB (Hons)

Searchlight - The Zionist Front Group

Here we see Searchlight exposed as the Zionist front group it truly is - and its leadership exposed as linked to the most evil, greedy and avaricious capitalists on the planet in the centre of the city which most represents the naked avarice, greed, degeneracy and rampant free market capitalism - Las Vegas.




Sunday 05 June 2011

Grass-roots campaigning in local communities remains key to defeating fascism in all its forms, Searchlight deputy director Ruth Smeeth told GMB delegates today.

Addressing a fringe meeting at the GMB conference, Ms Smeeth praised the work of the GMB, Hope Not Hate and Searchlight in defeating the electoral ambitions of the BNP at the last election.

Yorkshire region retired members delegate John Paine referred to the unique role played by the 43 group which was set up at the end of World War II to fight fascists on the streets.

"Capitalism always keeps fascism on the shelf just in case," he said.

http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/index.php/news/content/view/full/105533




20 November 2007

...Labour Party Candidate Ruth Smeeth is the Director of Campaigns and Public Affairs for BICOM, the pro-Israel lobby group run by my favourite Mancunian blogger Lorna Fitzsimons and funded by Scandinavian arms billionaire Shlomo Zabludowicz and his son Poju, who owns half of downtown Las Vegas.



As for capitalism and fascism - the final stage in the defence of capitalism is never fascism, it is socialism.

The socialists riot and caue violence in the broken capitalist society as they agitate for social class war revolutions and hence allow the capitalist state to pass ever more laws the restrict and deny liberty and free speech.

Most of the socialist and left wing groups are funded by capitalists.

The 43 Group was a collection of Zionist Nazis - the irony being they fought the Nazis in Britain in order to impose Zionist National Socialism in Palestine.

EDL Rally for Israel

Well done to the EDL for their latest rally supporting Israel in London at the weekend.

For far too long the anti-semites in Nationalism have attacked Israel as a way of attacking Jews.

The simple fact is that Israel is not the enemy of British Nationalism.

Israel is a country.

The enemies of British Nationalism are those Zionists, of all races and religions, who put the interests of their racist, imperialist, fascist ideology before the interests of Israel, Britain and the British people.

The problem is that many Nationalists are either too thick or too brainwashed with anti-semitism to understand that being a Zionist does not equate to being either Jewish or with Israel.

The most dangerous and psychotic zionists in the world are not Israeli's they are Americans - and they are mainly the born again Christian fundamentalist lunatics who dominate the Republican Party.

Both George Bush and Tony Blair are Zionists and they started the wars we are fighting.

Zionism is not just a political project for Jewish lunatics, it is a fundamentalist Christian, left wing and right wing political project for lunatics all across the world for many reasons - and who are primarily not even Jewish.

Israel is a nation state and as nationalists we support the right of all peoples on the planet to national self determination - from Israel, to Palestine to Iran.

What we do not support are insane Zionists and Islamists that think they have the right to rule the world or the Middle East for the benefit of their own warped and perverted ideologies.

We as British Nationalists should support all Israeli Nationalists and resist all Zionists and Islamists.

I am sure that in the EDL there are some who do not understand the difference between Zionism and Israeli Nationalism, but then again there are far more in the nationalist movement who also do not understand the difference as well.

Our aim is to educate people that supporting Zionism is to undermine the very basis of Israel and Israeli Nationalism, as Zionism is not a nationalist ideology - it is an imperialist, expansionist and racist political ideology more akin to Nazism than Nationalism.

Zionists, Islamists and Nazis are all variants of anti-nationalist, racist and globalist ideologies.

The irony being of course that the Zionists, being Nazis politically and active Nazi collaborators during the Second World War, have far more in common with the Nazis on sites like Stormfront than they have with any nationalists.

The Zionists and Nazis are mirror images of each other.

Israeli Nationalists are those who want to see an Israel that integrates all its citizens, that fights Islamist and Zionist extremism, that stays within its own borders and takes care of all its people.

Thats why we must support Israel and Israeli Nationalists and resist both Zionism and Islamism.

The Strategy of Little Green Footballs and Harrys Place

After 9/11, the Neo-Conservatives and their Zionist allies saw an opportunity and developed a deceptive strategy of “Entryism” concealing their traditional anti-white Zionist supremacist bigotry with a facade of anti-jihadism.

Both Harrys Place, a site where the Jewish Zionist Edmund Standing writes, usually carries pieces on the BNP that are then copied onto the Little Green Footballs site: Revealing that both Harrys Place and Little Green Footballs real concern is empowering Zionism, not Islam.

Both HP AND LGF are Zionist controlled operations - whilst Little Green Footballs is a site for the swivel eyed, foaming at the mouth pro-Zionists and anti-Islam nutters, HP is a centre left site where the Zionism comes disguised with a moderate package.

The product is the same, just with a slightly different flavour to ensure the masses all get the flavour they like.

The 911 trick was to turn anti-Islamism into both anti-Islam sentiment and pro-Israel sentiment.

It worked.

The retarded Republican Right of the US public fell for it hook line and sinker - whilst waving the US flag they led their country into slavery to Zionism, Israel and AIPAC.

Dumb Americans were too stupid to see that what America required was a foreign policy that put the interests of American citizens first - not the interests of AIPAC, Israel, the oil companies, the military-industrial block and the globalists.

Instead in a knee jerk political spasm of historical stupidity, they waved the flag all the time their constitution, their civil rights and their liberty was removed.

In the name of 'fighting terrorism' that 'threatened the freedom of all Americans' they allowed their own government to remove their constitutional rights that guaranteed their liberty for hundreds of years.

Little Green Footballs and Harrys Place spend more time attacking the BNP than they do offering any constructive critique of Islam or Islamism.

This is because that is their primary role.

Both HP and LGF are designed to draw the hatred caused by 911 into support for Zionism and Israel, and therefore any groups that resist the domination of the Zionist cabals that control our media, much of our politics and much of our countries must also be targeted by LGF.

Therefore the two main enemies of LGF are ;

1) Islam

2) The BNP.

The BNP are in fact the primary threat to both HP and LGF.

This is because the BNP is not run by the US security services as much of the so called 'Islamist' terror groups like Al Qaeda are.

The Al Qaeda groups of the world wherever they appear are usually set up, funded, and controlled by either the CIA, the Saudi security services, the ISI of Pakistan or MI6.

From paying Al Qaeda in Libya to kill Gadaffi ( as MI6 did ) and the CIA running Osama Bin Laden as a CIA asset until the day of 911 ;

Link here ;

http://lukery.blogspot.com/2009/07/bombshell-bin-laden-worked-for-us-till.html

" Former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds dropped a bombshell on the Mike Malloy radio show, guest-hosted by Brad Friedman (audio, partial transcript).

In the interview, Sibel says that the US maintained 'intimate relations' with Bin Laden, and the Taliban, "all the way until that day of September 11."

These 'intimate relations' included using Bin Laden for 'operations' in Central Asia, including Xinjiang, China. These 'operations' involved using al Qaeda and the Taliban in the same manner "as we did during the Afghan and Soviet conflict," that is, fighting 'enemies' via proxies.

As Sibel has previously described, and as she reiterates in this latest interview, this process involved using Turkey (with assistance from 'actors from Pakistan, and Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia') as a proxy, which in turn used Bin Laden and the Taliban and others as a proxy terrorist army.

Control of Central Asia

The goals of the American 'statesmen' directing these activities included control of Central Asia's vast energy supplies and new markets for military products. "



HP and LGF are for the 'non-thinkers' of the anti-Islam movement.

The people that post on the site LGF are the sort of people that think ' My country right or wrong' means 'My president right or wrong'.

They think that anyone who waves a flag is a patriot - even if that flag is made in China and the person waving is a paid whore of the oil companies, the military-industrial block, Zionists and the mass media.

They think that anyone who speaks or preaches about 'Jeyzus' is a good guy - even if they are whoring, lieing, theiving hypocritical, mass murdering, corrupt son of a bitch.

The problem with most Americans is that they see politics only through the lens of America, and therefore any demagogue who wraps their rhetoric in the flag or who speaks about 'Jeyzus' will win them over.

LGF and HP are designed to cater to that market.

LGF appeals to the plastic patriots of America - the idiots who dont understand the difference between patriotism and nationalism.

HP appeals to the liberal leftist who likes their anti-Islam with a leftist tinge.

LGF appeals to 'patriots'.

A patriot is whore to whoever is in power - they serve only the government, not the people.

A nationalist serves only the interests of the people.

They see the 'government' as primarily a mechanism for the profit of sectarian interests within society.

Nationalists want the maximum freedom for the individual and the smallest State possible, as a nationalist knows that a large state and a large government are the enemies of democracy and the people.

Usually a nationalist regards the government, unless it is a nationalist government, as the enemy of the people.

Nationalists fought and died to build America.

Patriots surrendered America to the Neo-Conservative junta of Bush and to the Neo-Trotskyites of Obama.

Patriotism is simply slavery to the latest fool to wave the flag.

Nationalists see their only master as the Constitution and the will of the people.

Patriots will take up arms to invade foreign nations because politicians want to make profits from war just because that war is wrapped in the flag.

Nationalists act only to ensure the interests of the nation are protected by increasing national security within the nation.

Nationalists do not invade other nations - patriots will invade other nations as they serve the interests of the government and therefore they serve the interests of those that control the government.

The reason why the US was hit on 911 was because US troops were in Saudi Arabia and Al Qaeda were able to get into the US via the immigration system.

Note that the HP and LGF are against any political parties that demand ;

1) The withdrawal of and repatriation all troops from foreign bases


2) The ending of all lax immigration policies that allow immigration into our nations.


Dumb patriots are too stupid to understand that the fundamental cause of terrorism is when we are over there and they are over here.

Only when we withdraw from their lands (and thereby remove the causes of terrorism) will they not be able to attack us here ( when we remove them from our countries).

Instead the Neo-Con war on terrorism was based on ;

1) Increasing the presence of US troops and British troops over there (Iraq and Afghanisan, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia ) and waging a 'crusade' against Islam

2) Allowing more Muslims to enter our countries via refusing to tighten the immigration rules

911 was the opportunity for the US military Industrial Complex, the British Military Industrial Complex, the UK and US Zionists, the Oil Companies and the Globalists to turn the fear and trauma caused by 911 into unquestioning obedience to their plans.

Wrap the flag around the New Oil Imperialism and the sheeple would bleat and applaud even as theur liberty and constitution were being stolen away from them beneath their very noses.

The traitors like Bush and the 911 Cabalists were only able to complete their plans with the help of websites like LGF and HP.

They are accomplices to the crimes of their masters.

Therefore as the dogs they are, they attack who they are told to attack by their masters.

I support America 100 % - but I despise the US Military Industrial Block, the Zionists of AIPAC, the oil companies and the corrupt media and security services that control the US

I support the right of Israel to exist 100 % - but I despise the Zionists that control it and whose tentacles slither in the halls of power in Britain and the US.

I support the right of the Palestinian people to national self determination 100 % - but I despise Islamism.

Only when the inner enemies are purged from all our nations will our nations and our people be free.

There are probably less than 100,000 of these inner criminals in both our nations - they are the head of the dragon, and that must be severed if both of our nations are to survive and our peoples be free.

Obama, The Taliban and WW3

Obama is the puppet of Israel and AIPAC.

Therefore his foreign policy is Israels foreign policy.

The first announcement that Obama made when he became president was that he would send thousands more US troops in to Afghanistan and then demanded the UK Zionist puppet Brown did the same.

The plan is now clear.

The 'surge' of troops into Afghanistan was not designed to defeat the Taliban in Afghanistan - the aim of the recent massive troop deployments into Afghanistan was designed to drive the Taliban DEEPER INTO PAKISTAN.

It was obvious to everyone that deprived of ground in Afghanistan the Taliban would drive deeper into Pakistan.

First they took the Swat Valley with the blessing of Pakistan government and now they have a base in Pakistan they are now spreading deeper into Pakistan itself - and they are now less than 60 miles from Islamabada the capital city.

The Obama plan has always been this ;

1) Destabilise Pakistan

2) Force the Taliban into Pakistan to start a civil war in Pakistan

3) This civil war will then allow the US to enter Pakistan and secure Pakistans nuclear weapons

4) US troops will be parachuted into Pakistan to secure the military installations that hold the nuclear weapons and secure them or remove them


This plan is now becoming obvious.

The plan was never to defeat the Taliban - a bunch of well armed goat herders - the plan from the beginning was to secure Pakistans nuclear weapons.

The Taliban were always sponsored by the ISI and Pakistani army and by confronting the Islamists in Afghanistan this would cause chaos in Pakistan and allow the US to enter the country and take the nuclear weapons.

The fruits of this plan could be WW3 for if the Americans fail to secure the weapons then thousands of US troops may die in the attempt and leave the Taliban with the weapons in their hands.

Pakistan will be torn apart by civil war as the Pakistani nationalists wage war against the Islamists that want Pakistan to be another part of the global caliphate.

Yet again the Zionist agenda dominates US foreign policy and threatens world peace.

The war drums are already being beaten by Clinton and the Zionist media in the UK and US ;


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/clinton-says-pakistan-poses-mortal-threat-1672927.html


Clinton says Pakistan poses 'mortal threat'

By Arshad Mohammed, Reuters


Thursday, 23 April 2009
Share Digg It del.icio.us Facebook Reddit Print Article Email Article Text Size
NormalLargeExtra Large
Pakistan's government has abdicated to the Taliban in agreeing to impose Islamic law in the Swat valley and the country now poses a "mortal threat" to the world, the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said.


Surging violence across Pakistan and the spread of Taliban influence through its northwest are reviving concerns about the stability of the nuclear-armed country, an important US ally vital to efforts to stabilize neighboring Afghanistan.

US President Barack Obama, who on March 27 unveiled a new strategy that seeks to crush al-Qa'ida and Taliban militants in Afghanistan and those operating from across the border in Pakistan, meets the presidents of both countries May 6-7.

The talks illustrate US anxiety that Afghanistan could again become a haven for al-Qa'ida militants to launch foreign attacks more than seven years after US-led forces toppled the Afghan Taliban regime that sheltered the Sept. 11 attackers.

Speaking to US lawmakers, Clinton said the Pakistani government had to provide basic services to its people or risk seeing the Taliban, and other extremists, fill the vacuum.

Under pressure from conservatives, Zardari earlier this month signed a regulation imposing Islamic law in Swat, a northwestern valley once one of Pakistan's most popular tourist destinations.

Asked about the matter, Clinton bluntly replied: "I think that the Pakistani government is basically abdicating to the Taliban and to the extremists."

Speaking before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Clinton said, ominously, that the situation in Pakistan "poses a mortal threat to the security and safety of our country and the world."

Swat was a major tourist spot until 2007, when militants infiltrated the valley from strongholds on the Afghan border to the west in support of a radical cleric.

After inconclusive military offensives and a failed peace agreement, Pakistani authorities accepted an Islamist demand for sharia, or Islamic law, in February.

Teresita Schaffer, a former US diplomat who served in Pakistan and now heads the South Asia program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank in Washington, said many analysts share Clinton's assessment.

"There is deep concern in the US government, and elsewhere in this country, about the implications of the deal in Swat," Schaffer said. "It represents a cession of state authority to people who have been slitting the throats of policemen in the public square."

Schaffer said she did not believe Clinton viewed the Pakistani state itself as a mortal threat.

Rather, she said Clinton may have been suggesting that events in the country, where militants are believed to have plotted foreign attacks and set off a series of domestic suicide bombings in the last month, threaten other nations.

The White House says the May 6-7 talks between Obama, Karzai and Zardari will include a three-way meeting. The talks represent the US president's effort to ease tensions and forge more cooperation between the two countries.

Kabul has accused Islamabad of not doing enough to stop militants crossing the border to launch attacks in Afghanistan. However, ties have improved under Zardari, whose country is facing its own Islamist insurgency.

Obama has authorized the deployment of 21,000 additional US troops and hundreds of new diplomatic and other civilian officials to Afghanistan to try to quell the Taliban insurgency in the south and the east of that country.

A senior US commander said US and NATO forces were close to achieving "irreversible momentum" in their battle with insurgents in eastern Afghanistan, saying this was partly due to an influx of some 4,000 US troops to the area this year.

The New Witch Burnings

From The Spectator, it appears that another heretic is being prepared for the bonfire.

Note how the vile reptile Pollard takes a valid critique of Tonge about the power of the Zionist Israel Lobby in the UK and US and then seeks to smear her by equating her points with "I'm surprised she hasn't referred to our drinking the blood of non-Jewish children. "

This is loathsome journalism, an attempt to smear and villify an opponent not on what they said, but on an implied aspersion with no basis.

This is the action of a vile, pathetic, venal and spiteful little man - another whelp of the Zionist Israel Cabal that has infiltrated and usurped our political and media systems.

Pollard himself like to make plain his Jewishness in hi articles primarily as he assumes that by emphasising his racial background then no-one who is non-Jewish will 'dare' challenge what he says on the basis that due to his Jewishness he is beyond reproach.

Not content with seeking to make a comparison between criticising Israel and the blood libel of Jews, this little rat Pollard has then sought to leave an impression in the minds of the reader that Tonge was implying this.

This is truly the politics of the gutter, and proof yet again of how The Spectator is simply a turgid rag for the propaganda of the Tories, Israel, UK Zionists and their lackeys.

I would use the spectator for its true purpose - but its paper is a bit too harsh on the bottom.


As for Powell and Tonge - Powell was removed by a homosexual being blackmailed by the Russians - Ted Heath - and Tonge was removed by a drunk who was being pressurised by media that was threatening to out him as an alcoholic.

In both cases their removal were to do with forces outside their parties.

In both cases they were correct, but telling the truth was not sufficient to protect them.

Powell had the support of the nation, Tonge had the support of a large section of the public - yet both were censored and sacked.

Powell has been proved correct in eveyrthing he said and Tonge will be proved correct in the future when historians look back at this period.

Until then the truth must be called a lie.



http://www.spectator.co.uk/stephenpollard/813491/tonge-rattling.thtml


Baroness Tonge of JewsRunTheWorld is at it again. She has already offered her Protocols of the Elders of Zion-like view that:

" The pro-Israeli lobby has got its grips on the Western world, its financial grips. I think they have probably got a certain grip on our party."


Last night in the Lords she offered this further thought:

" I am beginning to understand the power of the Israel lobby, active here as well as in the USA, with AIPAC, the Friends of Israel and the Board of Deputies. They take vindictive actions against people who oppose and criticise the lobby, getting them removed from positions that they hold and preventing them from speaking—even on unrelated subjects in my case. I understand their methods. I have many examples. They make constant accusations of anti-Semitism when no such sentiment exists to silence Israel’s critics. "


It's the usual trick of saying that "constant accusations of anti-Semitism when no such sentiment exists" is used as a tool to shut people up. Let me say for the nth time: it is perfectly possible to be critical of Israeli policies without being anti-semitic. Many Israelis oppose the government.

But just because it is possible doesn't mean that it's a given. In some cases, the language and the arguments which the speaker or writer puts forward show that they do indeed cross the line into antisemitism.

And what is loud and clear from Baroness Tonge's tongue is that she believes almost every one of the classic antisemitic tropes: "the pro-Israeli lobby" (you can safely assume she means Jews and their useful idiots) "has got its grips on the Western world, its financial grips"; and the Jews as a community have the power to punish and destroy their opponents. I'm surprised she hasn't referred to our drinking the blood of non-Jewish children.

It wasn't Jews who removed Baroness Tonge from her LibDem post; it was the then party leader, Charles Kennedy, because he rightly judged her words to be beyond the pale. Enoch Powell wasn't sacked by Heath after his Rivers of Blood Speech because the 'Black Lobby' forced him out but because Heath realised instantly that his views rendered him unfit for front bench duties. So too with Baroness Tonge.

Labour might have been beaten into fifth place by the BNP last week, but it's clear that the BNP has its own representative on the LibDem benches.

Lancaster Unity - The facts

There are few things more repugnant than racist extremists using 'anti-racism' as the basis of their extremism.

One such collection of poisonous hypocrites are the self professed Zionist extremist Jews on Lancaster Unity.

A few months ago in a rare example of honesty, the LU website stated that most of the people who control the site and post on the site are Jewish.

Them being Jewish is of itself irrelevant. They were only declaring and using the fact of their 'Jewishness' to divert attention from the true issue, which is the fact they are Zionists.

It is the fact that the people who control LU are Zionists is the most important issue.

The LU Zionists are part of the same type of extremist Jews who supported and worked with the Nazis during WW2, and who even offered to fight alongside the Nazis against the British in Palestine, even as the Death Camps were murdering millions of non-Zionist Jews in Europe.

The fact that Jews, and all racial groups, in the UK organise ethnocentric organisations to represent their interests in British society is an admirable thing.

All communities should organise to represent their collective ethno-communal interests.

But the problem begins when a tiny cabal of manipulative and deceitful Jewish extremists organise to represent the interests of Zionism and then use the camouflage of 'Anti-Racism' and 'pro-working class propaganda' in order to attack other racial groups who are also organising to represent their community interests.

This what LU does, its main role is to assist in the weakening and dismantling of the group cohesion of the White British Working Class in order to assist in the power building of the Zionist extremist network in the UK.

The people in LU are part of the lineage of Jewish Zionist extremists that supported the genocide of the Palestinians, that worked with the Nazis and that supported mass Islamist immigration into the UK over recent decades.

The entire actions of the Zionist cliques that have hijacked the British Jewish community over the last fifty years have been pernicious both to the mainstream British Jewish community and to British society.

This admission of the LU being run by Jews was not the whole truth though, as the fact is that most of the people who control the site and post on the site are in fact Zionists. Even this admission was an act of duplicity.

The majority of Jews in the UK are loyal to Britain and are integrated into British society.

The Zionists that control and post on Lancaster Unity are not.

They are neither loyal to Britain nor are they integrated into British society. They pretend to be part of Briish society only in order to undermine and usurp it.

Their primary loyality is to Israel and they seek to weaken British society, and usurp our political system for the benefit of Israel.

There may be a few deluded reds and liberals on the LU site that think the LU is a 'real' site to fight racism, but just as Lenin said these 'useful idiots' are just cover for the real agenda of LU.

Lancaster Unity is part of the Zionist power network in the UK. The LU is just another propaganda wing of the C18 of UK Zionism, the CST (Community Security Trust).

The CST is run by the convicted fraudster Gerald Ronson, and he has bankrolled Ken Livingstone and the Labour Party in the past. Even though the CST is run by a convicted fraudster, the Met Police still work with the CST para-military organisation. Last week the CST put 500 troops on British streets to patrol two parades to celebrate Israel ;

http://www.thejc.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m11s18&SecId=18&AId=60868&ATypeId=1

They call them volunteers, I call them a militia.

Note that the LU has never investigated or attacked the CST on its site. Even though the CST is a Zionist Para-Military Militia that is linked with the government and the police and run by a convicted criminal, the LU have never investigated this shadowy racist organisation or attacked its existence.

If two skinheads in the UK started wearing the same coloured bootlaces at the same time then the LU would see a grand conspiracy and the formation of a 'nazi army', but when a real racist para-military militia exists in the UK, the LU stays silent on it and its activities.

Why does LU stay silent on the CST - because LU is one of the propaganda wings of the CST and the Zionist power network in the UK.

Many on the left are now realising how duped they have been by these Zionist groups over the years.

Whilst the old alliance between the UAF and Searchlight was dismantled precisely because the UAF finally realised that Searchlight was a Zionist front group using anti-racism as its cover to promote Zionism in the UK, the Lancaster Unity site is run by a shaky coalition of Jewish extremists with a pro-Zionist agenda as the main unifying force between the various factions.

http://www.searchlightmagazine.com/index.php?link=template&story=146

Note that the LU site likes to post articles about the 'Nazis' from all over the world ranging from Chile to Canada, yet never posts a single critical article on Israel and its policies.

Last week a law passed through the Israeli Knesset called the Prevention of Infiltration act which criminalises asylum seekers and puts them in prison for four years and gives a 7 year sentence to asylum seekers from various Arab countires on a specific list.

Can you imagine how the hypcorites on LU would have howled if it had been Europeans in a European country passing such a law that criminalised asylum seekers and has a 'racist' policy of targeting specific Arab nations for extra imprisonment - but because it was Israel, a country which a member of the European Union by the way, the LU remained totally silent on the issue.

Whilst the LU attacks the Berlusconi government in Italy for its arrests and deportations of illegal immigrant criminals, it stays silent on another European Union country, this being Israel, who passes laws that target immigrants and which are probably the most fascist in the whole world and which are probably illegal under international law.

Why did LU stay silent - because the Jewish Zionist extremists that run the LU can never attack the country that sponsors them, Israel.

Note also that the LU remained totally silent on the new laws proposed by Harriet Harman that would have passed racist legislation that would have impacted upon the White British Working Class.

Why did LU stay silent - because the extremist Zionist Jews that run LU are going to be one of the main beneficiaries of this law and because their agenda is to assist in the systematic disempowerment both politically and socially of the indigenous British people and the promotion of all ethnic groups which assist this process.

Seeing as the Zionists that run LU are primarily Jewish Zionists and Middle Class, as they themselves boasted about on the site a few months ago, then why should they attack a law that attacks the White British Working Class.

Being attacked by LU is how one achieves validation.

Those so called 'nationalists' that post on LU and who pass information to LU are traitorous scum. The fact that the nationalist traitors and the Zionists on LU all attack the exact same nationalists, is evidence we are doing the right thing.

If the nationalist traitors and LU were not attacking those nationalists, then that is direct proof that they are agents of the enemy.

The enemy only attacks those it does not control.

The article below relates to the issue of LU and it collection of Zionist and Jewish extremists that masquerade as 'defenders of the working class'.



http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2008/06/lancaster-unity-run-by-racists.html

Banned By Jihad Watch

It is one of my proudest achievements to have been banned both by Stormfront and Jihad Watch. Accoding to Stormfront I am a 'Jew lover' and according to Jihad Watch I am a 'Neo-Nazi'.

Whilst both trumpet their right to free speech as the basis of their right to exist, each censors any voice that dares question their facile dogma and cant. This is the cowardice of our contemporary world.

It expects blind obedience, not questioning of its cant.

Jihad Watch is a website run by Robert Spencer and David Horowitz, and is primarily a Zionist run anti-Islam website. As we all know David Horowitz is a foaming at the mouth pro-Zionist, and the site is designed to incite hatred against Islamists and to minimise the scrutiny of the Zionists in all our nations.

By Zionists I mean all those who are both Jews and Non-Jews both in terms of religion and race, such as Christian Fundamentalists, that put the interests of Israel before their own nations and who seek to influence UK and US foreign policy for the benefit of Israel and to the disadvantage of our own nations.

I am both an anti-Islamist and an anti-Zionist. I despise both the Jihadists with their goal for a global caliphate and I despise the Zionists who at present have such influence over Britain and Americas internal political development and its foreign policy.

As a nationalist I do not want my country dominated either by Jihadists or Zionists, as to me both are the primary drivers of the carnage and hatred in the world. They both feed off of each other in a diabolical dialectic that is drowning the world in blood.

I say ' Keep Islamism and Zionism in the Middle East where it belongs - and please fuck off back to the Middle East as soon as possible ". If the Jihadists and Zionists want to kill each other then there is plenty of deserts in the Middle East for them to do so.

Just dont use my country as proxy killing ground for your centuries long racial and religious war.

One such example of Zionism as an political force organised for a political purpose in our contemporary societies was the role of the pro-Israel lobbies both in the US and UK in pushing for the both the first Gulf War and the invasion of Iraq.

Not just content with pumping out the fake ' they threw babies out of incubators ' propaganda in the Gulf War, the Israeli lobby and pro-Israel media also pumped out the fake ' 45 minutes to bomb London - fake WMD ' bullshit before the Iraq War.

This was a crime against humanity - an example of the same kind of propaganda that Julius Streicher once published in the nazi paper Der Sturmer in order to justify the nazi invasions of Poland the Europe. Julius Streicher was hung for his pro-war propaganda, in the UK the media propagandists get knighthoods and in the US they get invited onto CNN and Fox news to pump more bullshit into the enfeebled brains of US citizens.

Such is life in our Moronocracies.

Jihad Watch is a site designed to 'control' the anti-Jihadist movement by ensuring the pro-Zionist lobbies and groups in the US control the development of the anti-Jihadist movement itself.

It is a sort of pro-Zionist anti-Islam propaganda site, where the anti-Islamists of the world can attack Islam whilst the issues of WHY Jihadism is growing does not ever mention the following nasty little secrets ;

1) Israels treatment of the Palestinians

2) The power of the Israeli lobby over US foreign policy

3) The domination of the Israeli lobby groups over Washington politics and US electoral system through funding of both Republican and Democrat candidates in elections

4) The power of the pro-Israel lobby groups in the American media that propagandised the Gulf War and the attack of Iraq and that spread the 'fake WMD' propaganda that was the bogus basis of the Iraq War itself.

Its main role as a website is to ensure that the Israeli-Zionist lobby groups can control the development of the anti-Jihadist movement across Europe and the US and thereby ensure that the tricky questions they do not want addressed never get raised in public.

It is a site all about Paradigm Control, and the site seeks to ensure that growing anti-Jihadist movement does not develop into a united and cohesive movement that not only rejects Jihadist and Islamist infulence in our nations, but that also rejects the power of the Zionist lobby groups and pro-Israel lobbies in our nations.

What Jihad Watch wants is for the West to reject Islamism, but to continue to be coerced and manipulated by the pro-Zionists and pro-Israel lobby groups that have such undue influence in our nations.

We all know that the primary lobby group in the US is the loony Christian Fundamentalist 'Jesus will return to Israel' Rapture types and the Israeli lobby groups, and both these groups have an interest in inciting anti-Islamism but minimising the threat from the US and UK public realising that the danger is from Islamism but that the reason why Islamism is growing is because of the foreign policy dcisions of their governments and their unswerving and uncritical support of Israel.

This is why the pro-Zionists and Christian Fundamentalists seek such a tight grip on the development of the anti-islamist movement, as they know that the moment the public begins to ask that one question " Why do they hate us so much " instead of their usual " Why are we putting up with the Islamist terrorists" then that question opens a whole can of worms that they cannot afford to be opened up.

Here is the e mail that banned me from Robert Spencer and here is the link to the thread.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019648.php


" To whom it may concern:

I am going to ban this fellow Lee John Barnes forthwith, as we have seen enough of his repugnant views, but I have decided not to remove his posts. Since he has stood for office as a BNP member, the repugnant neo-Nazism and antisemitism he has displayed here should serve as a wakeup call for all those who come here wanting to defend the BNP on anti-jihad grounds.

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend" is a game Maoists play. Defenders of Western civlization, and of all that is humane in the world, should not be so willing to become like that which they are fighting in order to defeat it.

Cordially
Robert Spencer "

Posted by: jihadwatch at January 21, 2008 12:57 PM


It is to my immense satisfaction that I was banned after just four posts.

For all those such as myself that are NATIONALISTS, we must oppose not just the Islamist threat but also the Pro-Israel lobby groups that have such influence and control over our nations and our foreign policies.

Nationalism is not about attacking Islamism whilst allowing the greasy Zionists to slime their way into power over us.

Unless we control our own political and national destiny then we have already lost.

I have no hatred for Arabs and Muslims, I have been to Arab and Muslim nations and have seen they are just people like us and in many ways they have a more admirabe attitude to family and kin than we do in the West. I also have no hatred for Israel and the Jewish people, in fact I have admiration for their toughness and fortitude and their history of standing up for themselves against all odds.

But I am a British nationalist first and foremost - and their wars are not my wars.

The place for Zionists is Israel not Britain.

The Zionists and their political influence must be excised from our nation and from our political nsystem, just as the Islamists and the terrorists must be excised from our countries.

Unless we start to put the interests OF OUR OWN PEOPLE AND COUNTRIES FIRST then what is the point of fighting Islamism if we are falling into the trap of domination by Zionist and pro-Israel lobby groups.

Both Zionism and the Jihadists must be resisted and removed from any positions of power in British and US soceity.

The terrorist threat from Jihadism is as much a danger to our national democracies as the threat posed by the pro-Israel lobby groups. Both are anti-democratic forces with the interests of their respective agendas taking precedence to the interests of our nations.

So Mr.Spencer you and the rest of the brainwashed Zionist sock puppets that despise Jihadism but who are willing to blindfold themselves about the pro-Zionist and Pro-Israel lobby groups that threaten the democracies of our nations can go screw themselves.

We see you for what you are - propagandists and manipulators with an pro-Israel and anti-US and anti-UK agenda.

You want to keep us mired in your petty little dirt and religious wars in the Middle East.

We will end all influence that both Zionism and Islamism have in our society - we stand for a free , fair and impartial Britain not a slave to either Islamism or Israel.