Anatole Kaletsky and the BNP

The solution is now clear - the globalist neo-liberal free market model is dead.

The future is either British Nationalism and a National Economy that regulates and directs the development of a new British economic and industrial model or slow decay into irrelevance as other nations, such as China, dominate the world with their NATIONALIST ECONOMIC SYSTEMS.

Kaletsky knows that the choice is simple - between Globalism and Nationalism.

Between a Nationalist politics that puts the interests of the British Nation, British people and British economy first or a globalist model that rewards and enriches a tiny minority of corporate directors whilst impoverishing the rest of the nation and people.

The question is simple - WHO DOES THE BRITISH ECONOMY SERVE ?

If it the British people, British nation and British companies then that is Nationalism, if it serves the interests of globalism and corporate profits then that is TREASON.


All the suggestions as put forward by Kaletsky already exist - they are in the BNP manifesto.

He should read it, as he may then be as ahead of the curve as we are.



http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/anatole_kaletsky/article7014090.ece

The most important statements are often those that are left unsaid. Among the millions of words spoken at last week’s World Economic Forum in Davos, the comment that nobody quite dared to utter was clear. After the crisis of 2007-09, the global capitalist system is in a period of transition, comparable to the great transitions of the 1930s and 1970s.

The question that nobody wants to raise is whether the new model of capitalism that emerges to dominate the world will be a radically reformed version of the Western democratic system or some variant of the authoritarian state-led capitalism favoured in China, Russia and many other emerging economies.

As a leading US diplomat told me: “Since the crisis, developing countries have lost interest in the old Washington consensus that promoted democracy and liberal economics. Wherever I go in the world, governments and business leaders talk about the new Beijing consensus — the Chinese route to prosperity and power. The West must come up with a new model of capitalism that’s consistent with our political values. Either we reinvent ourselves or we will lose.”

There are several ways of dealing with, or dodging, this challenge. The easiest way, most in evidence last week at Davos, is plain denial. Instead of thinking about the future, it is easier to focus on the past, to quibble about regulations and argue about who is to blame.
BACKGROUND

* Trust me, experts don't know either

* China defends currency against Western sniping

* China threatens Obama over Dalai Lama meeting

Another more insidious form of denial is to pretend that the Chinese and Western models of capitalism are not really very different. Everyone, after all, is in business to make money, so on the issues that really matter, there is no great rift. This is the standard view among all businessmen with big investments in China, especially those like Bill Gates, of Microsoft, who enjoy seeing their rivals politically squeezed by Beijing.

It is also the official line of Chinese and Western governments. Our two models can prosper in peaceful co-existence and mutual respect.

This is an illusion, as was evident from the background chatter in Davos. Whether we look at business practices, economic policies, political and human rights or geopolitical interests, it is clear that China and the West are on a collision course. Serious collisions may not occur for decades, but the two models of politico-economic development are incompatible in the long term.

In business practice, China unambiguously favours domestic industries over Western exporters and investors. China’s determination to run huge export surpluses and maintain an undervalued exchange rate gives America and Europe cheap consumer products; but it also means lost jobs and the accumulation of ever-more foreign debts. On human rights, far from confirming the naive slogan of the Thatcher-Reagan period that free markets create free people, China is becoming more adamant in its rejection of Western-style democracy. Perhaps most seriously, China’s growing confidence in its authoritarian politics and government-led economic development is creating inevitable frictions with the West, from Korea, Iran and Tibet to Sudan, Zimbabwe and Venezuela.

We in the West have a choice. Either we concede the argument that China, in the 5,000 years of recorded human history, has been a much more successful and durable culture than America or Western Europe and is now reclaiming its natural position of global leadership. Or we stop denying the rivalry between the Chinese and Western models and start thinking seriously about how Western capitalism can be reformed to have a better chance of winning.

We must stop pretending that minor reforms to banking will restore the performance of the Western system, and focus on the deeper lessons from the financial crisis and the years before. Outside the echo chambers of Washington and Westminster, it is obvious that what went wrong in 2007-09 was not just a lapse in bank regulation. It was a failure of the entire market fundamentalist model of capitalism created in the Thatcher-Reagan period, which assumed that the market is always right.

That this version of capitalism ultimately failed in 2007-09 does not mean that the reforms were wrong. Their reforms were essentially and entirely appropriate for the period. The free-market system created from 1979 onwards represented a necessary evolution after the failure of the previous government-led, union-dominated Keynesian model. In the same way, this Keynesian version of capitalism, created in the 1930s, was a necessary evolution from the classical laissez faire capitalism destroyed by the Great Depression.

The challenge for Western thinking now is to create a fourth version of capitalism that builds on the best elements of the classical, Keynesian and Thatcher-Reagan models, but adapts to the needs of the 21st century and specifically to the rivalry with China’s dynamic and self-confident authoritarian system. Whether this is possible is very much an open question, which I try to examine in a book on the new model of capitalism, which I call Capitalism 4.0, to be published in the spring.

Some of the changes required are obvious, and are happening already. For example, governments and central banks are accepting much more explicit responsibility for managing economic growth and employment, as well as inflation.

Others are more controversial. For example, do Western political systems need to be reformed to make them more conducive to compromise and rapid, consensual decision- making instead of the political paralysis that now threatens the US? Do we need an economy in which government plays a bigger role in finance, energy, environment and strategic infrastructure investment, but actually reduces public spending and taxes by backing away from some of its traditional, and ruinously expensive, responsibilities for health, pensions and education?

These are the sort of questions that the movers and shakers ought to have been discussing last week in Davos. Maybe they will face up to them next year.

George Monbiot and Crayfish Racism

Image - Guardian journalist interviewing chav alien, " Are you sure you arent a racist ? ".

Alien replies, " Naah, I am a Prawn inni so I cant be can I. Anyway what about me yooman rights".

Guardian journalist, " But youre not human ".

Prawn replies, " Oh charming, whos the fucking racist now eh. Right wheres me mobile, OI TRACY LOVE, get me mobile ! Its in me shellsuit on the table in the hot tub. Right you wanker, I am ringing me solicitor about this harassment. I have had it up to my gills with this fucking planet. I read about that wanker George Monbiot in your shite paper a few days ago - hunting, killing and eating me cousin, Bert the Crayfish. What a Bastard. Wait till I see the four eyed posh twat. I will stick my tentacle right up his public school arse ".

Alien turns around, goes inside hut and shuts the door.

As Guardian journalist turns to leave a tentacle in a V shape appears through the open window of the hut, and the alien shouts, " And your Earth beer is shit ".

Window slams shut.

Guardian journalist sits in car typing out another ground breaking peice of British journalism on how Prawns in District 9 have embraced racism and want to join the BNP.








A cracker of an article in The Guardian from George Monbiot about my crayfish article here ;

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/oct/01/crayfish-bnp



Heres my advice George ;

1) Look up 'Satire' in the dictionary

2) Develop a sense of humour

3) Stop being a po faced prick


The idea that anyone, anywhere, except in the minds of po faced pricks like George Monbiot would want to 'eat an illegal immigrant' is an example of liberal insanity.

The fact that George, in a fit of liberal delirium, has drawn an anaology between human illegal immigrants and crayfish, something which I never did anywhere in the article, reveals more about his psychology than mine.

It appears that George, whilst on the surface is a fully paid up member of the Guardianista, self loathing white middle elite, beneath the surface there be dragons, strange and dark thoughts and visions afloat within the deep, dark murk of his subconscious mind.

How else to explain the existence of the analogy he draws - and that I did not draw.

Perhaps the mythical joke that the liberals think the 'BNP will eat babies if they come to power' is actually true, that it is not a joke.

Jesus, I hope they really dont think that.

If it is true then they really, truly are insane.

As for George Monbiot - the pro-multi-culturalism, white flighter who pontificates about the joys of diversity from his oh so white and exclusive beach home in whitest Wales, you really are the epitome of liberal hypocrisy.

Perhaps the crayfish killers, the parakeet slaughterers, the muntjac deer shooters and the rest of the Eco-Xenophobes should be rounded up, branded with a big 'R' on their foreheads and also join the ranks of the damned alongside all those tarred and feathered by the media as the New Racist Heretics.

If people like George really are running this country, then we really are in deep shit as a nation and a society.

Watch out, watch out - theres a Witchfinder about !

(P.S District 9 is a brilliant film - and thats about the only thing George has got right )

DEATH TO THE USURPERS !

Eco-Xenophobes of Britain Unite !

Cleanse our fields and forests, streams and rivers of all alien crayfish invaders !

(P.PS Thanks George for the slogan and the free publicity for my blog. Top man. )


P.P.S Read the comments on The Guardian, they are even calling George a fascist for being a crayfish exterminating nazi. Jesus wept, where is Brass Eye and Chris Morris when you need them.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

What demons we unleash in our sleep! On Wednesday I posted up a photo guide to catching the red signal crayfish, an introduced species from the US which is trashing the aquatic ecosystem and killing our indigenous crayfish. By catching as many as you can, you can help to control this invasive species, while getting a great meal for nothing.

Innocent enough you might think. Well it was until it got picked up by the British National party.

I think you can probably guess how this story pans out, but here's the BNP's legal officer, Lee John Barnes, in his own words:

The North American Crayfish is the Mike Tyson of crayfish. It is a diseased, psychotic, evil, illegal immigrant colonist who displaces the indigenous crayfish, colonises their territory and then reproduces until it totally devastates the indigenous environment and indigenous crayfish. I am saying nothing governor.

But theres a phrase of his [George Monbiot] that I believe should be the motto of the Eco-Xenophobes everywhere. I intend to use it more and when I do I will accredit it to George Monbiot; DEATH TO THE USURPERS !

Subtle, isn't it? Without necessarily contravening the laws on incitement to racial hatred (and we can expect the BNP's legal officer to know just where the line is drawn), Mr Barnes appears to be comparing the American red signal crayfish to human immigrants, whom he apparently wishes to put to death. "I'm saying nothing governor" means: you know exactly what I'm saying, but if you do your worst I can't be held responsible.

Barnes is not the first person to make an analogy between invasive species and immigrants, though these days it is seldom spelt out in such stark terms. The analogy suggests that people from other parts of the world belong to a different, non-human species. Perhaps he's been watching District 9, where the alien asylum seekers do look a bit like crayfish.

Unlike Mr Barnes, I don't know exactly where the line is drawn, but is it possible that he has not been quite as clever as he thinks he is? Is there a legal-minded person out there who can offer some advice?

The Liberal Double Standard

Images - compare and contrast. A young Asian muslim boy at a demonstration in London holding placard gloating over the 911 attacks. An image of young White female child at BNP RWB festival burning golliwog. The former boy child must be understood, sympathised with and nurtured, whilst the white girl child must dehumanised, abused and vilified. The former gloats over mass murder. The latter burns a golliwog.






Where does love and hate come from ?

Are we all born with a fixed quotent of hatred and love in our souls that we then distribute throughout our lives, or are love and hatred simply manifested within us by the circumstances of our lives ?

I believe the latter is the answer.

I believe that whilst we all have the same emotional capacity to hate and love as much as each other, it is the circumstances of our lives that produce those emotions within us.

Take for example young Muslim terrorists and extremists in the West.

We are told that Muslim extremism in the West always has a cause - Israel, Islamaphobia, racism etc etc

But whenever a white person gets involved in radicalism then they are simply racists.

Whilst the former are born good and are turned into terrorists (according to the liberals) the latter are born evil and are born racists.

Here for all to see is the racist double standard, illogical inconsistency and hypocrisy at the heart of the liberal stance on racism.

Whilst racism always has cause, only whites are never listened too.

Whenever a young British Muslim is involved in an act of terrorism anywhere in the world we are told by the media, the politicians, the liberals and the leftists that we must understand them, that we must try and discover what drove these good people into doing bad things, we must search for what is that radicalises them, we must root out the causes of terrorism, we must empathise and sympathise with them so as to reflect the fact that something created that hate within them.

We are told we must understand what drove the Real IRA bombers who planted the bombs in Omagh, we are told we must understand what drove young British Muslims to become involved in suicide bombings on the London Underground, we must understand what racism does to black people in our society, we must talk to the Real IRA, we must talk to the Taliban, we must talk to young British Muslims.

At every level of these issues and events the liberals and media say ' we must engage with these people and seek to understand what instigated and motivated their hatred '.

But never when they are white.

When young white people exhibit hateful or extremist behaviour, then they must simply be demonised and dehumanised.

They must be classified in that most modern of catergories as ' A Racist' and regarded as a sub-human, whose innate humanity is removed and denied.

They must be stripped of all their humanity, transformed into abstractions and propagandised to the masses as the epitome of evil.

This is what our politicians, our media and our own people do to our people.

Even worse than this, they dehumanise white people they regard as 'racists' to such a level that death threats, physical violence and politically motivated acts of racial discrimination against them become accepted in our society, lauded even.

White people in Britain are the majority victims of race attacks each year in our country.

At the same time gangs of non-whites seek out whites to commit crimes against them, so that whites are the victims in the majority of crimes involving different ethnic groups.

In every city and every town day after day whites are killed, raped, attacked and abused simply because they are white.

Yet this is never reported in a way that truly reflects what is happening, for in order to ensure 'good community relations' the government, media and police all conspire to hide the truth from the masses.

The fact that whites are the main victims of racism in the UK, is never reported in a way that reveals that fact - each attack is just a small story that is forgotten the next day. This contrasts with the incredibly rare real race attacks on ethnic minorities which are blown up into huge media stories that lead to massive public inquiries, they are subject too massive police investigations with vast budgets, detectives are pulled off inquiries into the murders of whites to form huge teams to investigate 'racist' murders against ethnic minorities, community centres are renamed and non-white charities set up to benefit non-whites and discriminate against poor whites.

When a white victim of racism dies the truth is hidden.

Only rarely does a case gain the level of attention of the Kriss Donald murder, but there has never been a public inquiry into the racist murder of white person unlike those for Zahid Mubarek and Stephen Lawrence.

There has been no Kriss Donald Inquiry = why not ?

The problem for the media, the government and the police though is that every day more and more white victims of the multi-cultural system are created.

Every day more and more white people are having the scales torn from their eyes as their lives come to reflect the hidden reality of our society.

They, their husbands and wives and their kids are stabbed, robbed, raped and beaten by non-whites, and when they see that way the system conspires to minimise their pain and hide their suffering - and they come to hate and mistrust the system.

WHITE RACISTS ARE MADE, THEY ARE NOT BORN RACISTS - JUST AS MUSLIM TERRORISTS ARE MADE, THEY ARE NOT BORN TERRORISTS.

The Ivory Tower dwellers of our society - the liberals, leftists and middle class white flighters and urban enclave dwellers - will one day experience their own awakening too.

When a young white girl burns a golliwog in a bonfire the media and liberals howl with indignation, but when a young British Muslim blows up a tube train and kills dozens of people we are told we must 'understand what drove them to become an extremist' and that we must' engage with these people to cut away the roots of radicalism'.

White victims are dehumanised and called 'racists' in order to shut them up.

Muslim criminals and terrorists are told to speak up, for they will be listened too and empathised with and offered millions in tax payers money to stop them from becoming more radicalised.

Muslim community leaders who represent the muslium community are feted by the police and government, whilst elected BNP politicians are banned from the police and banned from particpating in public debates.

At every level the majority victims of racism and the majority victims of the multi-cultural process - working class whites - are disenfranchised, dehumanised and attacked.

Their pain and suffering is ignored, minimised and hidden in the name of political correctness and ensuring good race relations - when all this sick double standard is doing is driving more and more white people into radicalism.

When a young white girl burns a golliwog the liberals never ask 'why ?'

They dont need to ask why as they already know the answer, and its because she is a 'racist'.

She was born white, therefore she was born a racist - and only those whites who spend their entire lives repudiating and attacking their whiteness, or who breed with non-whites, can be non-racists.

Whites are born racists and therefore they must be dehumanised in order to prepare society for its next step - which is not stand in the way of a state sanctioned and controlled series of programmes of systematic genocide.

The liberals never think to themselves of the double standard operating in their minds at that moment, for the very same people who say we should not demonise muslims, we should talk to muslims to understand why they are so full of hate and that we should work with them to undermine islamic radicalism are the same ones saying ' this white child is not a human being, she is just a racist'.

This language of the 'sub-humans' is the same language that Trevor Phillips has used to call members of the BNP.

Phillips likes to attack the BNP as he can racially abuse whites and white society by hiding that attack under the guise of attacking the BNP.

Whilst the BNP are accused Trveor Phillips of attacking asians when we talk about Islam, as most Muslims are Asians, Trevor Phillips and his liberal fellow travellers are doing the same when they attack the BNP. They are in reality racially attacking whites but hide that attack by using the BNP as the pretext of their attack, because they know that members of the BNP are white.

When we attack Islam we are called racists as most Muslims in the UK are asians, but when Trevor Phillips attacks the BNP he is not called a racist even though he knows the members of the BNP are white.

Yet again a double standard operates.

This double standard though carries the seeds of the downfall of the multi-cultural system, for the more white victims are created the sooner the collapse will come of the entire multi-cultural system itself.

Multi-culturalism is a racist police state built with lies, and every day more and people are being attacked, raped, beaten and abused and are waking up.

One day the 'phoney peace' will break down and the civil war will break out.

The media, government and police and all the power of the Surveillance State will not be able to prevent its downfall, as muti-culturalism is a machine that can only work as long as whites remain silent whilst they are murdered, impoverished and made into powerless slaves.

And the tragedy will be that it will be the lies, double standard and racism of the multi-cultural system itself that will start that civil war.

Our role in the BNP is to educate the victims of Multi-culturalism that hate is not the answer.

They must learn to love both themselves and their own people.

Hate is not a productive emotion, and the system wants us to be mindless haters.

The last thing the system wants us is to direct our time, minds and energies organising, community building and social networking.

It wants us to be haters, as hatres are incapable of rational thought.

Our victory will come when we stop hating and start thinking.

Our role is to re-educate the haters of our people to become useful parts of our national liberation movement, and get them educated, trained and deployed to build the massive national resistance movement we need to take power.

Those that succumb to hate merely empower the system.