Sunny Hundal and the Anarchists.

Sunny Hundal complains about the police classifying Anarchism as a threat to society.

Lets hope we can get Sunny Hundal to dress as a police officer at the next student / anarchist demo in London and then throw him to the crowd.

I wonder if he will survive ?


Hmmmmm.



http://liberalconspiracy.org/2011/07/31/met-counter-terrorism-office-report-anarchists-to-the-police/



Anarchism is a political philosophy which considers the state undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful, and instead promotes a stateless society, or anarchy. Any information relating to anarchists should be reported to your local Police.

Hermione Hoby and the Black Rape Rappers

For an example of how pathetic this country is, then take a read of the article in The Guardian by the white middle class liberal idiot journalist Hermione Hoby ( you could not create a posher name if you wanted too ) where she reviews an album by a bunch of black rappers, Odd Future, who have released an album glorifying rape, torture and murder.

Yes - rape, torture and murder.

Link here ;


http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2011/may/08/odd-future-tyler-creator-rape


And yes this white, British, middle class, mummuy and daddys nice posh girl is celebrating this album as an equivalent of the rap albums by Public Enemy.

Look at the picture of her on the article.

She is so white and middle class she could be a poster girl for Laura Ashey.

Yet she thinks she can review rap albums.

Yes Hermione - you are a total twat.

You were only given your job as you are another idiot middle class white femal liberal journalist churned out by our university system that specialises in brainwashing whites with liberal moronism - and The Guardian likes to have young blonde women doing reviews of rap albums whilst the black journalists on The Guardian staff do the important stuff like going to America and interviewing prime ministers and presidents.

Its all about the diversity agenda and chalenging pre-ceonceptions dont you know okay ya.

The problem is that the 'diversity agenda' and 'challenging pre-conceptions' is now the mainstream in our society, and we are all bored to fucking death with this infantile leftist social agenda masquerading as journalism being imposed on us.

Here is some news for you lefty mugs.

We do not celebrate when Robin Hood has a black Maid Marian put in the script or when the Thor the movie has a black Norse god in it or when the new series of Camelot from America has a black knight in it - we just yawn and say to ourselves ' oh for fucks sake, more politically correct casting by some liberal fuckwit. EPIC YAWN. Why do those ethnic people who take these 'pc placement' roles in movies and TV shows not have the dignity to refuse the 'white massers' obvious patrionising hand out and instead accept film roles based solely on THEIR TALENT and not on their race '.


This is the primary problem in Britain and America - white, middle class fuckwits who are so 'race sensitised' that when it comes to judging blacks by the same standards of the rest of society - they prefer to ignore what they are actually saying and seek to find any 'justification' for why they are saying it ( even when there is no justification such as in the case of Odd Future ) or they prefer to ignore their real talents as actors and give them roles that merely emphasise their race ( as in the case of Camelot the new series from America with the black knight in King Arthurs court) .


This is exactly what the ( black ) journalist and writer Erik Rush called 'Negrophilia' in his superb book Negrophilia which exposed the pernicious 'I am so anti-racist that I have become a racist' white liberal sickness in the heart of our society.

Liberals have become so anti-racist that they have become racists - in that they seek to make excuses for ethnic groups that they would never accept for whites and have created a system of race based moral relativism which is akin to liberal apartheid.

The same rules do not apply to everyone equally as some ethnic groups deserve more breaks, opportunities, support, assistance and understanding than any white groups.

Hence the EDL are 'evil' for daring to articulate white working class interests when they seek to expose issues like the endemic Muslim rape and grooming of white children in British society and yet Odd Future who rap about rape are somehow representative of the black anger and social alienation of American blacks and therefore must be listened too.

Oh fuck off.

So these are the morons that infest the British media - white, middle class, liberal, brainwashed morons.

Oh and Hermione - just so you know - Public Enemy were a band that put forward a positive message of black community and self empowerment and who stood for resisting the 'false media' and the system as corrupt power blocs in a corrupt America.

They also made excellent music that has stood the test of time.

You are an agent of the 'false media' that Public Enemy despised and fought against.

These collection of dickheads in Odd Future rap about rape and murder - they do not offer any message except a torrent of filth and depravity.

For you to mention PE in the same breath as these fuckwits is to not only reveal your utter stupidity, it is to demean the very message that PE stood for.

Go away Hermione - stick to reviewing things more akin to your talent, like pony shows or cake bakes at the WI.

Idiot.

The EDL - Where Next

There is nothing truly more pathetic than the 'intellectuals' in the EDL leadership trying to court political parties like UKIP.

The EDL is not a political organisation, and any attempt by its leadership to politicise it will destroy the EDL.

Mistrust those who want to politicise the EDL as they are either idiots or working for the state.

What I find hilarious though is how the Nazis on Stormfront (the worlds most active keyboard warriors and inactive activists) are attacking the EDL as much as the UAF.

Heres a tip for the neo-nazi's of the planet - hey guys and gals when you find you are in total agreement with the UAF, the reds and the liberal media fuckwits then perhaps you should reconsider your position on the issue.

The dickheads on Stormdfront spend as much time, effort and keyboard bashing attacking the EDL as the UAF do on Lancaster Unity.

I am beginning to wonder why it is the collection of morons on Stormfront havent yet realised that perhaps many of the anti-EDL posters and 'Nazis' on stromfront are also the same posters on Lancaster Unity - but when did an Internet Nazi ever have the capacity to think.

I have been warning the EDL for months that they will have undercover journalists, undercover police and undercover AFA in their ranks by now - and in todays Guardian they have a couple of articles about the EDL.

You can almost sense the fear in the article, for the Guardian realise that the EDL is primarily a white working class phenomena attracting other working class mixed race and ethnic groups into their ranks.

The decades of anti-white hatred, anti-British hatred, anti-Nationalism hatred pumped into white working class and ethnic kids in the UK has been smashed - and that instead of the media and education system conditioning working, these lads and lasses have managed to escape their programming and re-programme themselves.

Now wonder they are scared.

If the Red scum and liberal scum teachers all through the education system have failed to brainwash the EDL youth, and the media conditioning is failing to keep them brainwashed by reinforcing that conditioning all the time - then thats why the fear is rising from the elite and its lackeys in the media.

A people that thinks for itself is a threat to those who want to keep them enslaved.

The EDL though does need to dump any so called 'intellectuals' that want to divert it from its one mission - to oppose Islamism.

Those like Alan Lake in the EDL that think the EDL should morph into a political organisation linked with UKIP are not just living in cloud cuckoo land - they are actively endangering the movement.

The moment the EDL goes political - the EDL will be smashed by the state.

The state cannot smash protest movements, as the state has to allow protests in a democracy.

But protest movements with political aims can be smashed by the state easily, as the state has decades of experience in infiltrating political organisations and turning them against each other.

The constant handwringing of the Guardian over the EDL's racism towards Muslim extremists is pure hypocrisy - as The Guardian has supported the Far Left that have espoused and supported racism against Jews, Israel and America and Americans for the last fifty years.

Racism against Jews and Americans is supported by The Guardian when it is middle class racism, peddled from within universities and intellectual circles, but any hint of racism by the white working class against a designated 'Victim Group' is attacked - eg Islamists.

The last thing the EDL needs is witless self appointed leaders that know NOTHING about the media and the political system.

The idea that the EDL needs to lick the media arsehole and beg for their support is moronic, as the media will never support the EDL simply as the role of the media is to support the brainwashing by the state that we get at school.

The media want to smash the EDL - and the moment the EDL surrenders its core principle and strategy to oppose Islamism and links to a political party or embraces political aims, then the EDL will be smashed.

The EDL must remove all those people pushing for political links within it ranks, and also realise that it will never get media support - so just stop trying to get media support.

The aims of the EDL must be to ;

1) ensure that the overt racism in the EDL is stopped. The primary role of the EDL is to oppose Islamism and also to prepare youth, of all races, for their part in the struggle to oppose Islamism in the future. That means all racial groups have to be welcome in the EDL as all racial groups in the UK will be targeted by the Jihadists when the street war erupts.

2) To prevent any politicisation of the EDL and ensure the EDL remains a lawful protest group.

3) To ensure that the correct targets are hit by the EDL in the future eg demonstrations at the massive Islamist conferences in Birmingham and across the country held in venues like the NIA and NEC. The next time the NIA or the NEC or the O2 venues hold an Islamist rally then the EDL must target an event at the venues not connected to the rally eg a trade conference and flash mob the venue s to put pressure on the management not to allow Islamists and their supporters and funders are not able to hire those venues in the future. The venue owners must be made aware that when they offer their venues to Islamists then they will face constant disruption of their other clients who use those venues.

4) The EDL must start targeting universities that allow radical Islamists to teach kids and organise flash mobs in lectures of the Islamists in the universities that also allow Islamists to lecture

5) Target the people that fund, support and offer logistical support for the Islamists eg Tower Hamlets council and the Islamist groups that have political control in the council eg target Tower Hamlets councils with sit ins and demonstrations

6) Target the mosque developments paid for with money for Saudi Arabian Wahhabist extremists who fund mosques in the UK that promote Jihadism such as was revealed in the bookshop of the massive East London mosque by tv reporters a few months ago.

7) set up an EDL Prisoner Support Group - you have lads in prison right now with families and mortgages etc - you need to raise money to help their families, pay for lawyers and to buy them toiletries. Get the buckets out for the lads and raise money for them at demonstrations. Appoint proper and decent people to collect / bank and distribute the money to the lads in prison.



Standing around in the cold in a metal cage erected in a car park by the police for a few hours is pointless, its what the Old Bill wants the EDL to do.

But having the main EDL group draw all the police into one area whilst autonomous cells of activists have their own flash mobs elsewhere is very usual.

Use the power of the state against itself.

The EDL have to start organising select groups within the EDL of trusted activists who can organise themselves into small cells to target specific locations with flash mobs.

On the day of a big publically announced demo, these small cells can then target other sites for their own smaller demonstrations.

The leaders of each cell are in contact only with each other and only on the day of the event the location is revealed by the appointed group strategist calling the leaders of the cells.

For example a big public demo is held in London.

The cell leaders then hold their own action in London at another venue, for example they hold a demo at a conference venue in London that hosts Islamist groups.

So you get two demo's for one event.

Just remember the gloves and face masks lads eh. No point in making the states job easier in targeting people in our fascist Surveillance Society created by the New Labour Nazis.

The EDL must become more targeted and also the trusted activists within the EDL better organised.

The large public demonstrations are usual for propaganda in the media but the EDL must also start to target directly those that assist the Islamists.

As for the morons on Stormfront, dont even bother debating with them.

Half of the people on Stromfront are UAF and the other half are do nothing, big mouthed, keyboard warrior dickheads.

Fuck stormfront and its Hollywood Nazi morons.

The EDL will now face the full weight of the state.

Thats why the trusted activists have to start organising cellular structures right now for future events.

The public demonstrations are the way to draw the police, media and state into an area where YOU want them to be - so therefore use that opportunity to go on the offensive OUTSIDE those areas.

When you have big public demo then the cellular groups can go on flash mobs and have other protests elsewhere - which will also allow the two groups to raise morale as they see that the EDL is able to evade the police cordons erected for them.

Now the EDL must start creating trusted cells amongst its activists, listing targets for future demonstrations and recruiting more and more people into its ranks.







http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/video/2010/may/28/english-defence-league-uncovered

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/may/28/english-defence-league-protest-bnp

Hugh Muir and Voice of Africa Radio

An interesting little note about yours truly in todays The Guardian by Hugh Muir.

Whilst Hugh is more than happy to have a Voice of Africa Radio station in London run by blacks for blacks, and that’s fine of course, I wonder if he would support a Voice of Europe radio station for whites run by whites.

Oh yeah, I am sure dear Hugh would be just fine with that.

Not.

Hugh makes reference to my ‘strange logic’ when I said in the interview that I enjoy watching the film footage of Rodney King getting a good beating.

I do so love that movie clip.

To see a drunk, PCP taking, hallucinating mad man ex-convict who was driving through a suburban street high as a kite who when he was finally stopped in his car started to attack the police getting tasered and having the shit beaten out of him always makes me smile.

In fact, as I stated in the interview, I want all drunk drivers to get a good thrashing from the cops.

The interviewer asked me about Bob Bailey and his drink drive conviction and whether he deserved a thrashing and of course I said yes.

One does try to to have some logical consistency on these things.

Having been run over twice in the past I have to say that it bloody hurts.

Therefore I have ZERO sympathy for drunk drivers.

Unlike Rodney King though, if Bob Bailey had been given a good beating by the cops he would not have ;

1) Been able to scream ’RACISM’ until Al Sharpton and his race relation terrorists came to town and started a riot which killed 53 people and which featured, racist black gangs attacking innocent white people like the truck driver Reginald Denny.

2) Been a pussy who would have complained about the kicking in the first place, simply because as an ex-Royal Marine, Bob Bailey can give a good kicking (as we have all seen on You Tube - Bob Is Britain Epic White Beard, but minus the beard) as well as being able to take a good kicking if required.

Bobs a real man, unlike Rodney King who was a whining, weak assed criminal pussy who screamed racism to hide the fact that he was a convicted, repeat offender drunk driving, PCP snorting, maniac.



Here is what Wikkipedia says about the Rodney King incident ;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodney_King

On the night of March 2, 1991, King and two passengers, Bryant Allen and Freddie Helms, were driving west on Foothill Freeway (Interstate 210) in the San Fernando Valley area of Los Angeles. The three men had spent the night watching a basketball game and drinking at a friend’s house in Los Angeles.[2] After being tested 5 hours after the incident, King's blood-alcohol level was found to be just under the legal limit. This meant that his blood alcohol level was approximately 0.19—nearly two and a half times the legal limit in California—when he was driving.[3] At 12:30 AM, Officers Tim and Melanie Singer, a husband-and-wife team of the California Highway Patrol, spotted King’s car speeding. The Singers pursued King, and the subsequent freeway chase reached speeds in excess of 100 mph.[4] According to King’s own statements, he refused to pull the car over because a DUI would violate his parole for a previous robbery conviction.[5]

The fact is that the media footage shown on the TV news only showed around one minute of the total 9 and a half minute video footage, which if it had been shown in its entirety would have shown King lunging at the officers and attacking them.


http://www.seeingisbelieving.ca/handicam/king/


For nine minutes and twenty-two seconds, Holliday kept his camera trained on the scene, but it was just one minute of footage that would shock the world and spark 'the Handicam Revolution'.

By the time Holliday started videotaping, LAPD officers were already beating King. His tape begins when King charges officer Laurence Powell, who knocks King to the ground with a blow from his baton. Three other officers hit and kick King, who tries to rise several times, until he is taken into custody just over a minute later. In total, officers swung at King fifty-six times, delivering a beating that required hospitalization. King suffered facial injuries including fractured bones, and one of his legs was broken.

Realizing the significance of his footage, Holliday phoned the local police station, but claims that the person who answered the phone 'blew him off'. Next, he tried CNN, but no one was there to take his call. Finally, Holliday took his tape to local Los Angeles station KTLA. They edited out the blurry first 13 seconds of the tape showing King charging Officer Powell, and broadcast the last 68 seconds of the beating. The next day CNN and NBC obtained copies, and the tape was seen around the world.




Therefore the idiot deserved all he got - if you go to attack a police officer when drunk then expect to have the fuck beaten out of you.

But hey, all that never mattered did it.

All that mattered was that he was black.

Yeah right.

Give those cops a medal, because as a result of his beating Rodney King is now a reformed man.

He aint drunk driven again.

Goes to show a good beating aint done him no harm at all.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/20/labour-leadership-race-diane-hugh-muir

With the wounds of defeat still fresh and a party divided, things are difficult in the Nick Griffin bunker these days. And harmony may be more elusive than ever after yesterday's appearance by Lee Barnes, the legal director, on the Voice of Africa radio station. Oh we love you Africans, Lee said. And the softsoap was going well until the presenter Space Clottey raised an Observer story, revealing that Barnes posted on his blog a video of the infamous police beating in Los Angeles of black motorist Rodney King. Added to the post was Lee's note saying the footage was "brilliant" and that he laughed each time he watched it. It's not about colour, said Barnes, flustered. It's about policing. I think anyone who gets caught drink-driving by the police deserves a good hiding. So does that also apply to your fellow BNP lieutenant Bob Bailey, who was convicted of drink-driving last year, the presenter asked him? Should the police have given him a good kicking? "Well yes," said Griffin's legal adviser, trapped by his own strange logic. "Totally."

Sunny Hundal - How The Media Help The BNP

Image - Sunny Hundal of The Guardian and Pickled Politics. He could only have got his job through affirmative action plans as he is a talentless hack.

His head also resembles a hairy testicle.






I will analyse a few points from the article below - but if you read the comments section of the online article you will read that Sunny says in response to someones statement that 'It isn't "far right" to want to preserve the existence of one's people'

Sunny replies with the comment ;

' Why isn't it? You're saying to me that trying to maintain racial differences isn't racist? '

Thats all you need to know about Sunny.

If you do not breed with a member of another race, and thereby accelerate the destruction of your own unique racial identity, then you are racist.

What a total twat Sunny is.

This sick, poisonous and warped 'definition of racism' comes straight from Sunny's deranged little mind.

Perhaps we should all be held down and raped / sperm drained so as to accelerate the process eh Sunny.

I dare you Sunny to go to any country in the world, from Pakistan to Russia, and say that to the people of that country and call them all racists for not misceginating their own people out of existence - they will call you more than a total twat, they will probably beat you to death as well you lunatic.

Note that even Andrew Gilligan took the piss out of the group that sunny is launching for peddling lies about Nick Griffin's appearance on Question Time that Sunny said lead to the death of two gay men from homophobic attacks.

The first gay man who was killed died a MONTH BEFORE Nick Griffin appeared on Question Time.

The other gay man did not die.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/100026946/is-there-a-moral-difference-between-nazis-and-communists/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/andrew-gilligan/7220004/The-BNP-will-dig-its-own-grave-far-better-than-Peter-Hain.html

If Sunny is unable to even get the most basic facts such as those right - then he and his group are a total joke.

Yes Sunny, you are an embarassment to journalism.

When Sunny and his collection of sad media whores like Yasmin Brown and the terrorism supporter Peter Hain peddle such obvious bollocks, only a total mug would take anything that Sunny said seriously.

Sunny is a racist.


Not only does he deny the very existence of the indigenous British people ( which is defined as a 'Holocaust By Default' as if we do not exist then we can be exterminated at will and it is not a crime against humanity ) he is also a racist in that anyone who is indigenous British must be called a Nazi and denied the right to campaign in British politics.

My comments to sunnys article below are preceded by ######## and in brackets.




http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/feb/23/media-bnp-push-agenda

There was a brilliant column by Johann Hari a few years ago about his experience of appearing on a Sky News programme hosted by newspaper columnist Richard Littlejohn. Having admitted he didn't know how much an asylum seeker got in benefits, Littlejohn screeched at Hari: "It's people like you who help the BNP!"

Now, you could be forgiven for thinking that the election of two MEPs would bring the BNP under closer scrutiny since last year. Surely the media glare would expose its nasty underbelly? The party's deputy leader, Simon Darby, doesn't seem to think so:

"Dealing with the press on a daily basis it is hard not to develop a healthy disrespect for the people who quite rightly can be blamed for the state this country is in today. However, certainly over the last year I am not the only one here at BNP Towers that has noticed a distinct thaw in the attitude towards us from some aspects of the media."

The problem here is that while newspaper columnists and reporters keep stating they hate the BNP and all it stands for, they nevertheless keep promoting narratives that harden BNP support. Here is a short list I prepared earlier.

Blaming racism on immigrants

A common media theory is more immigration leads to a breakdown of social cohesion and hence more racism. If we want to stop racism then we must stop immigration, apparently. This assumes that people naturally hate those of other races or cultures – which isn't true. We don't have moral panics about Americans, Europeans or Chinese people coming here because there's no threat assumed from them. People don't naturally hate the other but are afraid if they think the immigrants represent a threat to their way of life.

There are different kinds of threats, of course, which may not even be to do with difference. Sometimes completely different cultures are tolerated as long as people "do their own thing". My point is that examples countering this myth are numerous. Social cohesion doesn't need to automatically break down but it sometimes does need to be managed if flashpoints take place (which could happen even in a racially homogenous country – for instance mods and rockers). However, I prefer a stronger sense of Britishness.

###### ( social cohesion of Britain broke down because Teddy boys and mods had a FEW punch ups in Margate in the 50's and 1960's. Oh right. Unreal. What a knob)

Blaming racism on minorities

You know the answer to this one – are Jews to blame for antisemitism? I think not.

######## ( Many people think that the actions and behaviour of many individual Jews over history, from Marx to Madoff, bear a lot of responsibility for provoking anti-semitism including many Jews from Gilad Atzmon to Norman Finkelstein to Noam Chomsky and Yoav Shamir. This is just Sunnys way of trying to blame British society for anti-semitism as well as blaming British society for Islamaphobia, rather than Islamists and Muslims being responsible for generating Islamaphobia or the actions of some individual Jews for generating Anti-semitism in society.

So Sunny has to defend the actions of Jewish criminals, extremists, crooks etc whose individual actions assist in the promotion of negative stereotypes about Jews because if he didnt then he would have to concede that Islamists and Muslims themselves are largely responsible for negative perceptions of Islamists and Muslims amongst non-Muslims. Especially those dead, maimed or limbless non-Muslims who have been blown up by Muslims and Islamist terrorists)


This trick is usually directed towards long-settled ethnic minorities and used to hold them responsible for problems as a whole. But rather than blame them directly, these days the vague punch-bag of "multiculturalism" is used instead. There is the strong insinuation for example that all black Londoners are to blame for knife crime (which has fallen hugely incidentally)

####### ( Another lie from Sunny, as we all know that the Black Christian church going people from the Commonwealth who live in London are not a problem in relation to knife crime. They spend their time in church praising Jesus not stabbing people. The idea there is just one set of 'black Londoners' is racist rubbish. West Indians hate Africans, Somalis etc. Sunny you are an idiot. )

, or "their culture" is to blame. That inevitably leads some to call them "savages". And because minorities are then labelled as backward or uncivilised, it becomes easy to blame them for hating them. After all, the mythical "race relations industry" is also commonly blamed for all the evils of the world, as is the funding of cultural festivals (I've dealt with this one in more detail here).


##########( would be that the same race relations industry that you exploited sunny in order to get your job on The Guardian, as you sure didnt get there for your talents as a writer or as a proponent of truth and facts did you sunny )

Overplaying BNP gains, underplaying Greens

Come election time, every media outlet is anxious to see how much the BNP vote will expand by. But despite the Nick Griffin on Question Time drama and two new MEPs, the BNP's electoral support remains woefully small at around 2%. In contrast, more successful parties such as the Greens are ignored by the media, because they're not seen as "dangerous". This always overplays the BNP presence in people's minds and gives the impression it has become a widely successful party.

######### ( Oh yeah, the Greens are ignored. What planet is he from )

Playing down impact of BNP victories

Racial and religiously motivated crime usually rises following election of BNP councillors, research has shown. And yet this fact is rarely highlighted.


######## ( The best one yet. If you follow the link on the article it reveals that the 'research' was done by The Guardian and Hope Not Hate. So we can all trust their research cant we. Then lets look at the figures. In 8 out of 29 wards hate crimes rose after a BNP councillor was elected - but the research doesnt reveal WHAT RACE the people were who were victims of that race crime. It is a fact that the election of a BNP councillor means whites then report race crimes when before they didnt. So the figures are related to whites reporting more crimes against them and also race crimes that are ethnic minority on ethnic minority. But the figures also reveal that in 11 wards RACE CRIMES DROP AFTER THE ELECTION OF A BNP COUNCILLOR. Which kinda fucks up totally sunnys bullshit thesis doesnt it. The article also quotes a police officer saying of the rise in race crimes in Solihull that " Detective Chief Inspector Sharon Goosen said: "None of the offences reported in the area since 2006 can be directly attributed to an elected member or political organisation."
So sunny was talking total shit. AGAIN ! )



But people who vote BNP aren't racist are they?

If you want to vote BNP and think people of different cultures and races are scary, why not just say so? Every modern interview with a BNP voter is prefaced with: "I vote BNP, not because I'm racist but ... ", which inevitably leads to a diatribe on why immigrants are leading the country into hell in a handcart. It has been repeatedly pointed out, even in most tabloids and broadsheets, that the BNP is a racist party. It is tearing itself over the issue right now. Surely it should be obvious to most what it stands for by now?


####### ( the BNP 'tearing itself' - ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha )

Debate on immigration is being suppressed

Probably the oldest trick in the book. The rightwing press talks about immigration every day. And yet commentators on the right maintain with a straight face that the debate on immigration is being suppressed. What they actually mean is: those immigrants who don't agree with us are all bad.

Let's be clear: Britain is now a multiracial and multicultural country. This means more mixing, which in turn means that racism can never become as socially acceptable as it was in the 70s and 80s. But people's attitudes are way ahead of many journalists – who are still happy to push their bigoted agenda. That is what keeps the BNP's agenda alive, and it needs to be exposed.


######### ( So journalists should not criticise Jews and Muslims, the government should force people to marry people from other races, the teddy boys nearly destroyed British social cohesion in the 1950's and the BNP have a time machine that enables them to travel back in time and kill gays - sunny you are the world smallest cockend. You even look like a cock you mug. )



• Sunny Hundal is speaking at the launch of Expose the BNP: media workers and students opposed to racism and fascism on Tuesday 23 February at 7pm at the Amnesty International Human Rights Action Centre, 17-25 New Inn Yard, London EC2A 3EA. Other speakers include: Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, Mehdi Hasan, Peter Hain and Michelle Stanistreet

George Monbiot Causes CRA Death Threats Sent To Me

Image - the leader of the CRA. " Come and have a go if your shell is hard enough ". Beware the Mollusc Mafia.






I have just had this threat posted on my blog ;


For the attention of George Moonbat and Barnes the Bastard.

From - The CRA (Crayfish Revolutionary Army)


02nd October 2009.

Statement begins ;


Today the CRA have added both George Moonbat and Barnes the Bastard to our 'Swarm, Pinch and Bruise On Sight' list.

All crayfish in the United Kingdom are hereby ordered to declare Holy War against Moonbat and Barnes until they are covered in nasty welts, blood blisters and slight grazing.

The recent images of Moonbat in his fascist rag, The Guardian, undertaking his racist, speciest, eco-xenophobic genocidal cleansing of a stream were amongst the most sickening images ever seen by North American crayfish kind.

The photograph on Barnes's blog of Moonbat holding one crayfish which was taken from the Guardian article Moonbat wrote, was my brother Eric.

As a result of Moonbats murderous rampage I have watched my family be eradicated from the stream where I live and now only have 354,024 brothers and sisters left in the ponds and streams of Wales.

This war against crayfish is a crime against our crayfish rights.

We are not immigrants as Moonbat says we are, we were spawned here and as such we demand an end to the tyranny of Eco-Fascism.

We stand alongside our oppressed Grey Squirrel and Parakeet comrades in this revolutionary struggle against the evil murderer Moonbat and his apologist Barnes.

We regard the Guardian as the rag which acts as the apologist for these crimes, therefore Alan - 'Plonkety, Plonk the Piano Man Plonker ' Rusbridger of the Guardian as an enemy of the swarm.

Today we have sent suicide squads of well armed crayfish up into the toilet of Moonbat and they intend to nip him quite hard on his nuts when he next takes a dump.

Barnes has been sent a suicide squad who are awaiting him in his local swimming pool and they have been ordered to nip on sight.

The CRA will not stop until this war against our species is over.

Crayfish of the World Unite, you have nothing to lose but your claws !

Smash the cooking pots of the capitalist elite !

Free our lobster brothers from the tables of the bourgeoise scum !

King Prawns rise up and free yourself from the red tide of Masala sauce !

(Please note that we are not linked to the CRF (crayfish revolutionary front), the RCRA (real crayfish revolutionary army), the CIA (crayfish international army) or the CRABS (crayfish revolutionary army brigade of scotland)- they are all just bastards and tools of the reactionary capitalist elite.

Statement Ends.


As a result of this threat I have now started wearing shorts instead of speedos to the pool.

George Monbiot and Crayfish Racism

Image - Guardian journalist interviewing chav alien, " Are you sure you arent a racist ? ".

Alien replies, " Naah, I am a Prawn inni so I cant be can I. Anyway what about me yooman rights".

Guardian journalist, " But youre not human ".

Prawn replies, " Oh charming, whos the fucking racist now eh. Right wheres me mobile, OI TRACY LOVE, get me mobile ! Its in me shellsuit on the table in the hot tub. Right you wanker, I am ringing me solicitor about this harassment. I have had it up to my gills with this fucking planet. I read about that wanker George Monbiot in your shite paper a few days ago - hunting, killing and eating me cousin, Bert the Crayfish. What a Bastard. Wait till I see the four eyed posh twat. I will stick my tentacle right up his public school arse ".

Alien turns around, goes inside hut and shuts the door.

As Guardian journalist turns to leave a tentacle in a V shape appears through the open window of the hut, and the alien shouts, " And your Earth beer is shit ".

Window slams shut.

Guardian journalist sits in car typing out another ground breaking peice of British journalism on how Prawns in District 9 have embraced racism and want to join the BNP.








A cracker of an article in The Guardian from George Monbiot about my crayfish article here ;

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/oct/01/crayfish-bnp



Heres my advice George ;

1) Look up 'Satire' in the dictionary

2) Develop a sense of humour

3) Stop being a po faced prick


The idea that anyone, anywhere, except in the minds of po faced pricks like George Monbiot would want to 'eat an illegal immigrant' is an example of liberal insanity.

The fact that George, in a fit of liberal delirium, has drawn an anaology between human illegal immigrants and crayfish, something which I never did anywhere in the article, reveals more about his psychology than mine.

It appears that George, whilst on the surface is a fully paid up member of the Guardianista, self loathing white middle elite, beneath the surface there be dragons, strange and dark thoughts and visions afloat within the deep, dark murk of his subconscious mind.

How else to explain the existence of the analogy he draws - and that I did not draw.

Perhaps the mythical joke that the liberals think the 'BNP will eat babies if they come to power' is actually true, that it is not a joke.

Jesus, I hope they really dont think that.

If it is true then they really, truly are insane.

As for George Monbiot - the pro-multi-culturalism, white flighter who pontificates about the joys of diversity from his oh so white and exclusive beach home in whitest Wales, you really are the epitome of liberal hypocrisy.

Perhaps the crayfish killers, the parakeet slaughterers, the muntjac deer shooters and the rest of the Eco-Xenophobes should be rounded up, branded with a big 'R' on their foreheads and also join the ranks of the damned alongside all those tarred and feathered by the media as the New Racist Heretics.

If people like George really are running this country, then we really are in deep shit as a nation and a society.

Watch out, watch out - theres a Witchfinder about !

(P.S District 9 is a brilliant film - and thats about the only thing George has got right )

DEATH TO THE USURPERS !

Eco-Xenophobes of Britain Unite !

Cleanse our fields and forests, streams and rivers of all alien crayfish invaders !

(P.PS Thanks George for the slogan and the free publicity for my blog. Top man. )


P.P.S Read the comments on The Guardian, they are even calling George a fascist for being a crayfish exterminating nazi. Jesus wept, where is Brass Eye and Chris Morris when you need them.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

What demons we unleash in our sleep! On Wednesday I posted up a photo guide to catching the red signal crayfish, an introduced species from the US which is trashing the aquatic ecosystem and killing our indigenous crayfish. By catching as many as you can, you can help to control this invasive species, while getting a great meal for nothing.

Innocent enough you might think. Well it was until it got picked up by the British National party.

I think you can probably guess how this story pans out, but here's the BNP's legal officer, Lee John Barnes, in his own words:

The North American Crayfish is the Mike Tyson of crayfish. It is a diseased, psychotic, evil, illegal immigrant colonist who displaces the indigenous crayfish, colonises their territory and then reproduces until it totally devastates the indigenous environment and indigenous crayfish. I am saying nothing governor.

But theres a phrase of his [George Monbiot] that I believe should be the motto of the Eco-Xenophobes everywhere. I intend to use it more and when I do I will accredit it to George Monbiot; DEATH TO THE USURPERS !

Subtle, isn't it? Without necessarily contravening the laws on incitement to racial hatred (and we can expect the BNP's legal officer to know just where the line is drawn), Mr Barnes appears to be comparing the American red signal crayfish to human immigrants, whom he apparently wishes to put to death. "I'm saying nothing governor" means: you know exactly what I'm saying, but if you do your worst I can't be held responsible.

Barnes is not the first person to make an analogy between invasive species and immigrants, though these days it is seldom spelt out in such stark terms. The analogy suggests that people from other parts of the world belong to a different, non-human species. Perhaps he's been watching District 9, where the alien asylum seekers do look a bit like crayfish.

Unlike Mr Barnes, I don't know exactly where the line is drawn, but is it possible that he has not been quite as clever as he thinks he is? Is there a legal-minded person out there who can offer some advice?

Dennis MacShane Reveals Who Britain Is Ruled By

Thanks to the Labour MP Dennis MacShane we now know for whose benefit our nation is run.

We also know why our democracy and liberties must be removed, so as to run the country for the benefit of minorities instead of the majority ;


Yes, as an elected politician leading a legal party, Le Pen is reported and awarded a share of time on the election news, just as Griffin has the right to. But given the undemocratic core of his views on Jews, Muslims and immigrants, French TV does not treat Le Pen and the National Front as just another party. British broadcasters should follow suit.


In other words because Jews, Muslims and immigrants dont like what the British people and the BNP are saying and who they are voting for, therefore our democracy and our rights of free speech must be removed to appease the demands of a minority.

Sounds like fascism to me !



http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/sep/08/bnp-question-time




The BBC whose lavish salaries and expenses paid for by the poorest of the land are obsessed with media stunts as they watch ratings slump. Last week, it was Adam Boulton announcing he would "empty chair" Gordon Brown if he refused Sky's pompous demand to debate on Boulton's terms with other party leaders. Now it is the BBC that has staged its publicity coup by inviting Holocaust denier Nick Griffin on to its flagship Question Time Programme.

Is there outrage? No, the liberal world slumps deeper into its armchair having a little moan about how nasty the BNP is, while the mainstream parties meekly agree to appear with Griffin.

Inviting the BNP's Nick Griffin as if he were the same as a senior politician from a democratic party is a stunt too far. The only full-length written work by Griffin – Who are the Mindbenders? – plays on old Nazi propaganda that Jews are the secret controllers of the media. As with Griffin's denial of the Holocaust and the BNP's ideology of hate against Muslim citizens, the core ideas are directly descended from the pre-war fascist era.

Yes, they get votes in low turnout elections from folk concerned about immigration. But not one in 10,000 voters knows Griffin's record. The argument advanced by Peter Preston in the Guardian and Matthew Seyd in the Times , as well as the Lib Dem MP Danny Alexander in the Daily Mirror, is that debating with Griffin somehow exposes him and his loathsome ideology.

If only. Question Time is not about rational debate but a ping-pong of point-scoring and gimmicks for cheap applause. Some of the audience will snarl at Griffin, some will cheer, when he denounces the number of foreigners in Britain or damns the EU. Sunny Hundal has advanced cogent arguments demolishing the myth that this is about a free exchange of views from which the BNP will emerge the loser.

In fact, the only winner will be the BNP vote-bank. French TV journalists went through the same arguments as Jean-Marie Le Pen rose in the 1980s. He and other National Front politicians were elected to Strasbourg, the French national assembly and local town hall. They had MEPs, deputies and mayors. Like Griffin, Le Pen was obsessed with Jewish questions though his main focus was Muslims, other immigrants and pulling out of the EU. But each time he appeared on the French equivalent of Question Time, his votes went up and the other party leaders spent their hour abusing each other as Le Pen just smiled at their political antics.

Today, French TV journalism is wiser. Yes, as an elected politician leading a legal party, Le Pen is reported and awarded a share of time on the election news, just as Griffin has the right to. But given the undemocratic core of his views on Jews, Muslims and immigrants, French TV does not treat Le Pen and the National Front as just another party. British broadcasters should follow suit.

If the argument is made that an electoral mandate confers the right to be boosted by the BBC on Question Time, why not the hundreds of independent councillors, or the other small parties who win seats?

This is not about democracy but about the BBC losing its sense of moral balance and editorial integrity. The BBC, rather than the Daily Mirror and Searchlight, should be exposing Griffin – not boosting his insatiable ego. As he enters his eighth decade (old enough to have been born during Hitler's Reich), David Dimblely should refuse to provide a platform for British fascism.

Gordon Brown should make clear that no Labour minister or MP will appear on Question Time to validate this disgraceful BBC stunt. Alan Johnson has spoken for most, if not all, Labour MPs and activists by making clear he will not help Griffin up the political status scale by appearing with him. Labour MPs will discuss this at the party conference and Labour's high command should listen to those who fight hand-to-hand with the BNP on the doorstep before caving in to the BBC.

David Cameron, too, should remember that when Enoch Powell made a racist speech in 1968, the Tory leader Ted Heath ended Powell's career as a front-rank Tory MP. Heath went on to become prime minister. Cameron and Nick Clegg should be as brave today. All democratic parties should make clear that if Griffin appears on Question Time, David Dimbleby can have him to himself.

The Guardian Allows Anti-White Racists To Post On Their Site

One of the most disgusting and racist streams of venom I have witnessed has come from newspapers like The Guardian in its reporting of the recent decision of the Canadian government to allow a WHITE South African to claim asylum in Canada because of him being persecuted because he is white.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/01/canada-south-africa-asylum-seeker

It appears that in the sick and twisted minds of liberals, all forms of racism are evil - except those directed at White people.

Lets analyse a few of the comments the Guardian allowed to be posted on the site ;

1) The official unemployment rate for white South Africans is 4.6% percent, compared with 27.9% percent for black South Africans despite an affirmative action programme.


That is utterely irrelevant to the issue of anti-white racism. The fact that Whites are more likely to be working than blacks is to do with the fact that many South African blacks have major self created social and individual problems which means they create their own unemployment. The fact that the law in South Africa has positive discrmination policies and affirmative actions that actively and racistly penalise whites means that if blacks in South Africa are unemployed it is their own fault. When the law is actively discriminating against whites when they seek employment, then it is impossible to say that the white employment is based on racism - in fact it can be argued that the white unemployed are the ONLY victims of racism, as they would probably be working if South Africa did not have anti-white racist employment policies that favour blacks.


2) Frans Cronje, deputy director of the South African Institute of Race Relations, said he sympathised with Huntley as an individual but there were myths around white victimhood. "If he has been stabbed so many times, I can understand his state of mind," he said. "The impression of persecution is very real but it doesn't stand up to scrutiny."

In this country we are using the McPherson Report definition of racism which states that if the victim believes he was attacked due to his race - that was a racist attack. Therefore the fact he has been stabbed 7 times and racially abused during those attacks = RACISM. The fact that the Guardian journalists are refusing to apply the same standard to this case, as cases against blacks in the UK, proves the innate racism of the Guardian.

Imagine if a Black man had been stabbed 7 times in London and racially abused each time - The Guardian would have already started a campaign for a public inquiry, opened a community centre in his name, given a life peerage to his parents and named a charity in his name. One standard for blacks , one standard for whites.


3) He added: "We have found no evidence that white South Africans are targeted because of race. The truth is that black South Africans are far and away more likely to be victims of violent crime. There are problems with the criminal justice system but again blacks are most likely to suffer."


Here we see the most disgusting evidence of racism.

The fact is that racist nations like South Africa DO NOT WANT TO FIND RACISM - and therefore they dont look for it, they dont report it and they dont classify it as existing.

The same thing happens in the UK with the Equality Commission. The Equality Commission does not look for racist attacks and racism against whites in the UK, as it does not want to find such racism - as if it did then it would have to investigate it, publicise it and deal with it. Therefore it is ignored, EVEN THOUGH WHITES ARE THE MAJORITY VICTIMS OF RACISM IN THE UK.

As regards the issue of black crime - that is irrelevant. Blacks killing blacks is not racist. Blacks targeting whites, attacking whites and killing whites on the grounds of their race is racist.

To state that blacks are the majority victims of crime is utterely irrelevant, the issue is the racial attacks by blacks on whites.

To say in this country that 'whites are the majority victims of crime, and therefore there are no race attacks against blacks' would result in the Equality Commission howling with rage that you are a racist !


4) As a white South African who actually lives in South Africa and who thrives in South Africa, to suggest that we are persecuted is patently absurd.

Here we see another Guardianista idiot. I have NEVER seen anyone black being racially abused in the UK, yet I do not deny such incidents occur in the UK. The fact this idiot hasnt been a victim of racism YET, doesnt mean anything. Unless this idiot is omipotent and able to experience what EVERY white in South Africa is feeling and experiencing, then his individual perception is utterly irrelevant.


5) As a middle-aged white male, I live in Johannesburg, SA, and have lived in cities across SA all my life.
I regularly travel to and through previously-disadvantaged areas - like the well-known Soweto - though I am generally confined to areas I live and work in, which are more affluent.
I have never been the subject of a violent crime, race-based or other. I do not deny this being the case for many other South Africans, some so horrible it hurts just to be aware of it (imagine being the victim).
The stark reality however is that a black citizen is statistically far more likely to be a victim of violent crime, race-based or otherwise.
I believe the place for all South Africans to work towards a better future is South Africa, and though many of my compatriots have suffered crime, our only hope as a nation is to work towards it.
That said, I have no qualm with people who cannot bear it leaving.


Here we see another white liberal idiot parroting the media line - as stated above the fact he hasnt been a victim YET is irrelevant, the fact is that Brandon Huntley was a victim of racism.

Levels of black crime are also irrelevant - the issue is race crimes against whites.


6) RustyRooster, obviously we don't all know one another, yet I am white and live in very much the same area that Huntley lived. Yes there is much crime, but this happens across all race groups. In addition, it seems he did not report one of the seven assaults to the police http://www.mg.co.za/article/2009-09-02-sa-crime-refugee-never-laid-charges-with-cops I am careful about crime, but I certainly do not feel percecuted because of the colour of my skin.

Why report it when you know nothing is going to be done about it as the police are as racist as the racists and the government.

The same thing happens in the UK with the equality commission - when whites report race crimes the Equality Commission does nothing, they just delete the e mail or ignore the letter.


The Guardian is a racist paper.

Media Quango Fascists ASA

Image - This image must not be seen, as some prick in the ASA has decided that the truth is now too subversive to be shown in our own country.






Yet another definition of racism crawls out of the woodwork, this one in relation to imagery used in advertising.

The ASA, a bunch of ASS's who are nothing more than up a jumped up pitifully pathetically correct New Labour Quango, have unilaterally decided to tell us what we can see and read in our own country and have also issued a new definition of that hydra with a thousand heads of 'Racism' which now includes ' reinforcing negative sterotypes' - even though those images may be true.

Yes, the truth, if its reinforces a negative stereotype, is racist.

Therefore the truth must be hidden and the ASA ban it.

This is how sick our society is.

A campaign which showed images of a WHITE victim of crime being attacked by Blacks cannot be shown as, even if the image reflects the reality in our society, if that image reinforces a social perception that Blacks are involved in crimes where Whites are victims, then that image must be banned as being racist.

This is insanity - in effect the truth must be hidden if it reinforces negative ideas about the Black community, even if the intent was to help the Black Community.

Note that no-one asked ' will this advert help white kids who are the victims of black crime going to the police as they feel their pain and suffering is being shown for the first time in our society as political correctness has prohibited debate on white vitims of black or ethnic crime ' - they just said that as the image reinforced the idea that blacks are muggers, then this advert must be banned.

WHO THE HELL ARE THESE SCUM !

The ONLY restrictions on our right of free speech are defined in the European Convention of Human Rights, and that states that ideas and images which distrubm shock and offend society are protected under free speech rights.

The only other people who have a right to say we cannot see an image are the police -under legisltation prohibiting that imagery eg child pornography.

The ASA is a jumped up politically correct joke of a QUANGO, and the charity involved in this pathetic case wont appeal the findings of the overpaid idiots in the ASA.

Therefore this little bit of media mindbending will go unchallenged - and another assault on our democratic rights and free speech will have been allowed to slip under the radar.






http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/aug/26/asa-kids-company#



A poster ad for a children's charity that showed two black teenagers harassing a white man reinforced negative stereotypes and was therefore "racist", the advertising watchdog has ruled.

The Advertising Standards Authority also found that another billboard ad for the Kids Company charity that stated "You are right – kids who can kill really are wrong in the head" beneath a picture of four black teenagers was likely to cause offence.

In addition, this ad made misleading claims about a supposed link between emotional development, brain size and violent behaviour, the ASA said.

Both ads were judged to be in breach of the ASA's code on decency, with the one featuring the claims about brain size also falling foul of clauses on truthfulness and substantiation.

The ASA conceded that Kids Company meant to raise awareness about the children it sought to help, but nevertheless ordered the charity not to re-use the ads, two out of five used in a poster campaign.

In its defence, the charity said the campaign as a whole had used a cross-section of local children from different backgrounds in and around Kilburn, north London.

According to Kids Company, the racial mix was representative of the children from the youth clubs in that area, with 80% of the children that came to it for help from Afro-Caribbean backgrounds, a proportion that was again reflected by the ads.

The Outdoor Advertising Association said it had cleared the ads as they contained both black and white children and were spread as evenly as possible across nine different stations.

Kids Company's ads were designed to "confront superficial judgments and prejudices" and challenged the viewer to reject stereotypes, the charity added.

The charity said the ad showing the black teenagers harassing the white man opposed the viewer's presumption – spelled out in the headline "How do you get inside the head of a 16-year-old knife-wielding thug?" – with the charity's point of view, written in italics: "First get inside the head of a 16-year-old bed-wetting boy."

However, the ASA found that this ad "focused on a negative image of black teenagers that was likely to reinforce negative stereotypes and was therefore racist".

The watchdog also said the ad linking violent teenagers to emotional underdevelopment "was likely to cause serious offence because it featured only black teenagers".

Kids Company said two images of the brain it used in this ad – one, larger brain was labelled "normal", while a smaller one was marked "extreme neglect" – had been taken from a US study on child trauma and brain development that demonstrated the effect of sensory deprivation on brain size.

However, the ASA said its interpretation of the study suggested it was referring to factors such as nutrition and children being raised in cages in dark rooms, not just to emotional development.

Moreover, the regulator rejected the idea that there was evidence that brain size had an impact on violent behaviour, as it found the ad had implied.

On both points, the ad had been "misleading", the ASA said.

Britains Biggest Twat Award 2009 - Peter Jones

Yes folks is that time of year again, when the awards are dished out to the rich, the famous and the pathetic.

This years award for Britains Biggest Twat is Peter Jones of The Guardian for the article about Meerkats and Racism.

Take a look at the boat race of this geezer.

What a totally smug looking twat.

You can just imagine him in the arms of his nubile Eastern European wench, their bodies locked in post-coital bliss when she leans over and says in a slinky Eastern European accent, " Vell zen Peter, ifs you is vanting any more of mine fine Eastern European poomtang zen you best be dealing viz zose fucking meerkats. I am so vucked off viz ze racism of ze British advertizing on ze telly. YOU WRITE TO ZE ASA YOU ASS OR NO MOREZ OF ZIS FINE ASS ! "

Poor old peter rolls from the bed, ripe metrosexual tears falling from his eyes, his feelings mortally wounded, he raises his arms to the godless sky and screams forth into the darkness, " DAMN YOU MEERKATS FROM HELL, YOU RACIST CUTE, SMALL MAMMALS FROM THE AFRICAN CONTINENT HAVE PUT ME ON A PUSSY DROUGHT, YOU MUST PAY, DAMN YOU MEERKATS, DAMN YOU TO HELL ! "

Oh woe to thee oh meerkats, poor old peter with his unused pecker is now on the warpath.

A well deserving winner of the award wouldnt you agree.




http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/aug/22/advertising-racism-meerkats





A few weeks ago, my girlfriend and I were watching TV at home when the advert for comparethemarket.com appeared on our screen. I had seen the ad before and not thought anything of it. However on this occasion, my girlfriend, who is Ukrainian, turned to me and said: "I don't like this advert, it is very offensive to me." I mentioned it to a friend who said his Latvian lodger also found it offensive.

The advertisement centres on the word "market" – a word that eastern Europeans/Russians pronounce "meerkat" – using talking CGI-animated meerkats. The sole point of this African animal's appearance is, it seems, to highlight the idea that east Europeans cannot pronounce the word market properly when they speak English. It struck me how racist it was to parody what is now a significant part of the British population in this way. It also occurred to me that were the ad to use stereotypical Indian or Caribbean accents in the same way it would never be allowed on TV.

Over the following week the ad seemed to be perpetually in our faces, the meerkat characters shouting "meerkats", "meerkats" in their stereotypical tones into our living room. I decided to complain first to ITV. When I looked on the ITV website, to my shock, I found that their business development manager Richard Chilvers was boasting that this was his favourite ad and that it helped to bring his "passion alive". I emailed my complaint. ITV responded that "the subject matter, content and treatment of all commercials are always given serious consideration to determine their suitability for transmission". They also stated that "particular care is needed to ensure that advertisements are not misleading or offensive". They then stated that I should contact the ASA (Advertising Standards Authority) which I duly did.

The ASA informed me that it did not assess advertisements before they went out but responded to complaints. The initial assessment and clearing was done by a company called Clearcast which, I was told, conveniently did not deal with the public. I then emailed my complaint to the ASA, whose response stated: "Whatever impact the mild stereotyping of the eastern European accent has is undercut by the fact that it is a cartoon rather than a live actor. As such we do not feel that the content of the commercial is likely to provoke widespread offence." It said it had not had any other complaints.

I asked my girlfriend why that might be. She told me that people from eastern Europe were brought up in a society where it was not normal to complain, especially to such sectors as the government and the media. She told me that they would not expect to be able to do anything about it, they would not know of the existence of the ASA and the power to demand that an advert was taken off television. It is also the case that as so many people from eastern Europe were so new to the country that they would not want to be seen to be causing trouble. It then dawned on me that this ad was targeting a sector of the population who would be unlikely to fight back.

The irony of the situation is that those in charge at the ASA and ITV probably consider themselves the most politically correct in society. However, the evidence shows that they have only learned who not to offend, not how not to offend. It looks as though those from eastern Europe are going to have the same fight on their hands as people from India and the Caribbean did all those years ago.

Lucy James, The BNP and THE BELIEVERS !

In the West, the most ignorant in any society are usually the most well educated.

This is because wisdom is like a pearl, in that it is formed over a lifetime.

It cannot be found, bestowed or produced in books.

It is produced only by direct experience of life.

Students are taught to think only in black and white, like the lines on the pages of the books they read where they derive their learning.

The problem with students is that they regard 'learning' and wisdom as the same things, when they are not.

A learned student that has just been excreted from a modern university with a new degree is not a wise person, for a learned student has simply learnt what the Establishment in power at any given time wants them to learn.

The proper aim of an educational system is to create fully realised, free thinking individuals whose innate talents have been awoken and trained to their very pinnacle of perfection.

Thereby the whole country and then the world benefits from the wise ones that we have invested so much money, time and enormous monetary, environmental and physcial resources upon.

The fact that most students leave university with closed minds and their values and beliefs warped by arrogant misconceptions and poisoned by asinine hypocrisy is primary evidence that the true aim of the modern education system is not to educate students into becoming fully realised, free thinking individuals but to produce politically correct bigots filled to the brim with bullshit and opinions, but little wisdom and even less intelligence.


We can prove this when we read articles such as the one here in The Guardian by ;

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/aug/20/bnp-far-right-racist-argument


Lucy seems like a sweet child.

Her face is even still shining with the waxy vernix of her infancy and she even resembles a precious little china doll.

Yet Lucy, in the hubris of her learned ignorance, believes she can diagnose a disease, then offer a cure, not without any direct contac or experience with the contagion or any research into why the contagion is spreading, but simply by reading of the contagion in books written by others who also have never had direct experience of the contagion or researched why it spreading.

The fact is that sitting in a university and reading books is not going to make you a wise, intelligent or useful person - in most cases university simply turns you into a tool - of the establishment, the existing class, political and economic institutions and interests and transforms you an enemy of all true free thinkers.

You see Lucy what you dont realise is that there is not ONE BNP.

You and your ilk see a monstrous monolith of ideology, when the reality is that the BNP is simply an organisation where free thinkers with dissident opinions gather to exchange ideas.

Take your article on Islam.

You argue that the way to take on the BNP is to challenge it on the facts.

First of all your use of 'facts' to rebut some of our propaganda are not in reality 'facts' at all.

The only true 'facts' are based on fundamental scientific principles and realities that remain eternal and unchanging in relation to the status of an individual object. Eg the orbit of the earth around sun and the composition of an atom of iron.


Your facts are simply products of the existing power, class, political and economic system - in that they are commissioned, sanctioned and disseminated by the system for its own benefit. Take for research into race. Up until a few years ago there were no research programmes in racial difference, and therefore scant 'facts' were available as to the reality of racial differences. Because of this failure to research the reality of racial differences the scientists and politicans could announce 'racial differences do not exist as we have no evidence to prove they exist' - and of course this was correct as they had NEVER looked for any racial differences and they had never funded any research into racial differences. Therefore no 'facts' existed to prove racial differences actually existed.

But with the advent of the era of pharmacogenomics, then the profit motive has caused the corporations, universities and research bodies to begin to investigate the science of racial differences. This is why we now see many papers being released on a regular basis that reinforce the 'factual evidence' of racial differences.

It is not until one section of the establishment has the power to initiate and authorise the evidence of a 'fact' that a fact becomes established as a fact.

Therefore the 'facts' you rely upon are merely projections of the present power structure, and therefore as the present power structure has an interest in undermining the BNP then it only allows anti-BNP 'facts' to be written, published and disseminated to students and the public via academic publications and newspapers - even though those 'facts' are not facts but are based solely on new lies built upon old lies - and these 'facts' that are then published into wider society or that end up in books in university libraries and on 'essential reading lists' for students.

Therefore each new crop of students simply adds another turgid turd of a dissertation or 'idea' based on the bullshit they have learnt on top of the already festering dung heap of ignorance built up by previous generations of learned idiots.

A new turd on top of the dungheap is not a 'fact'.

This is because in their arrogance and stupidity university students are foolish enough to believe that universities are institutions that are designed to produce wise individuals, instead of learned slaves.

The present Establishment does not allow democracy, free speech, free debate and the free flow of ideas in our society. Therefore your 'facts' are simply products of a flawed system and thereby can only produce flawed facts.

Your facts are products of propaganda, and therefore your 'cure' for the contagion will not work.

In reality, as opposed to the propaganda, the BNP is a hive of ideas.

The problem with the BNP is not that we dont have any good ideas, but that we have too many.

Take Lucy's research and report on Islam.

She believes she knows what the BNP as a collective entity thinks about Islam simply by secondary means eg via what has been written in party propaganda or what has been in published in the hostile media.

The idea that the propaganda of a collective entity represents the totality of opinion on an issue, is simply foolish.

Propaganda as a process is governed by many factors - such as the law, the medium of propaganda, the nature of the information to be transmitted, the culture of the recipients, the nature of the people and society and other issues.

Therefore propaganda does not reflect the totality of opinion in an organisation, but merely the process whereby certain opinions may be disseminated to the wider public at any given time.

As the nature of society evolves and the laws in that society are changed by those in power and become ever more rigid and shut down free public debate on an issue in order to protect the interests of the establishment in power, then in order to avoid arrest and prosecution propaganda is changed to ensure it remains within the terms of the new law.

Therefore propaganda changes to reflect social realities.

The present law is merely an instrument of control by those who are presently in power. The law does not uphold democracy, liberty or our rights, as only we can do that for ourselves.

The aim of the law in Britain today is simply to ensure the interests of the existing elite are protected.

The law, and those in power, are often the enemies of the people, and at such times revolutions are born.

The moment that any elite is so out of touch with the opinions, lives and experiences of ordinary people, and the scions of the elite obsessed with ideas rather than realities, then chaos is about to begin.

Lucy and her kind are victims of false consciousness, for they have been conditoned by the educational system and the media with opinions that bear no basis in relation to the reality experienced by millions and millions of people in this country.

Lucy is a prisoner in the illusions of her ignorance.

The two stories below reveal the reality of our country, and yet for Lucy this reality is to be ignored, hidden and minimised by focusing her attention on the propaganda that the BNP produce about Islam ;

http://www.bucksfreepress.co.uk/news/localnews/wycombenews/4552126.Police_action_targets_teen_muggers/

A POLICE operation targeting robbery hotspots has slashed muggings of young people by 100 per cent, officers said.

Patrols including stop and search on the Rye, Desborough Road, Eden and a skate park saw robberies fall to zero from 177 last year, they said.

This was among 12 to 19-year-olds. Operation Gauntlet will run to the end of the school holidays.

Police chose to launch the six-week operation after attacks by mostly Asian and afro-Caribbean gangs on white teenagers last summer, police said.

DC Paul Bowen said: “Officers would still stop large groups regardless of ethnicity but they would have at the back of their mind that the robberies are committed by this group of ethnic minorities.”

About 80 per cent of last year’s robberies were committed by gangs of Asian and afro-Caribbean people, he said.

Of last year’s attacks, 44 included the showing or threat of a knife.



http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/4555469.Teenager_gets_five_years_for_race_stabbing/


Manningham man shouted racial abuse before attack
9:03am Thursday 20th August 2009

By Steve Wright »


A teenager who stabbed and slashed a passer-by in a racially motivated attack has been locked up for five years.

Amir Rehman, 18, shouted racial abuse as 51-year-old Ronald O’Connor walked to a shop for a loaf of bread, near the gates of Lister Park, Manning-ham, last December.

Leeds Crown Court was told Rehman shouted out: “Manningham belongs to Muslims. We don’t want whites. We rule Bradford. We are going to get you out.”

His frightened victim, Ronald O’Connor, tried to get in the shop, but Rehman ran up and stabbed him twice in the upper arm with a four to five-inch bladed knife.


Lucy my dear, people dont vote BNP because of our propaganda on Islam.

They vote for us because they live in real fucking world.

Unlike you and your pitiful cabal of onanists, real people have real experience of the real world and this makes them wise.

They know the society they live in, the see how it is changing, they know the government lies to them and they know what sort of country their kids will have to live in unless this process of treason and betrayal by the politicians of all the mainstream parties is not stopped.

This is why so many socialists, leftists and liberals and other over educated, over priveliged, smug middle class idiots, mockneys and white flighting class traitors living in Dorset are appointed by the media to articulate the voice and interests of the working class - people like Billy Bragg, Miss Dynamite, Damon Albarn etc.

They do not represent the working class. They represent only themselves.

They have never experienced real life in a white working class estate as they exist in a cocoon of wealth, power and privelige that has managed to isolate from the real world.

Nor can white middle class university educated idiots ever represent the interests of the white working class.

Even white working class kids who do go to university are filled with the leftist and liberal bullshit they are exposed too and then become a BELIEVER !

A BELIEVER is someone who has little experience of the real world, but who believes what they have been told about the real world by other people who have never really experienced the real world either - people like teachers, academics and those slaves of the system who are able to get jobs in the system, get book deals in the system, that get funding to do reasearch and print publications by the system and those who are paid to produce the books, ideas and opinions the systems want promoted in wider society.

Those who really KNOW the world we live in, are always the most excluded from any public discourse.

Once upon a time in America only middle class leftist Whites and Jews were allowed to lead the civil rights movement in America for black civil rights, then the Blacks were allowed to organise themselves and promoted their own community interests.

Today we have black and asian academics, middle class whites straight out of university, radical lesbians and activist homosexuals 'articulating' and assuming the power and authority to express the opinions, ideas and experiences of the white working class.

These self appointed spokesmen and women then issue reports, PDF's, articles in The Guardian and give speeches in the house of Parliament about what the white working class experience, think and feel - when in reality all they are doing is regurgitating the bullshit they have been told and the lies the system pays them to produce and promote.

Give me a fucking break.

The idea that any Parliamentarian, Asian, Muslim, Black, Lesbian or Homosexual or Upper Middle Class White person can understand, articulate and represent the interests of the White Working Class is patrionising nonsense.

The last thing these people ever do is actually go and talk to the white working class or the the BNP.

Instead they print their reports, their articles and their research papers and merely pepetuate the ignorance of themselves and their peers.

In every paper we read how some government minister wants the government to talk to the Taliban, Al Qaeda, the IRA, radical muslim youth etc etc - but no-one ever says 'lets talk to the white working class who we have demonised and abused as racists for decades and find out what they really think, and lets talk to the BNP and find out why it is that people are really voting for the BNP'.

Instead we get the white working class demonised by smug, middle class arseholes in The Guardian as 'racists' for defending their interests as a community, culture, religion and as a race in our multi-cultural society where every other community, culture, religion and race is expected, funded and subsidised by local councils and governments to protect their own interests.

Nobody talks to the BNP even though we are the elected representatives and voice of white working class communities.

Why is the police talk to unelected members of the ethnic minority communities in places like London and Leicester where whites are a minority, but the police do not ever speak to the minority white community in those areas and ascertain what their interests are ?

The two articles above are merely a drop in an ocean.

When you get the brain and the balls to realise you have been talking bollocks all this time, then come talk to us.

We will tell you all about the real world little girl.

You will not like what we tell you though and you certainly wont get any research money to fund your report or get it published.

There really are monsters in the real world Lucy, not just the bogeyman of the BNP that you have been conditoned to believe is the problem.

Muffin The Mule Attacks The BNP

Image - Muffin The Mule - another New Labour supporting puppet attacks the BNP. Shortly after this picture was teken Muffin was rushed to hospital after overdosing on crack cocaine. Since his career hit the skids he joined the Labour Party and has been Gordon Browns main advisor on weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and a specialist in the Iraq Department of MI6.





An interesting letter in The Guardian from New Labour party members and puppets, a rump of z-list celebreties, knackered F-list sports stars from the era before colour TV, various idiots and journalists that support the Labour Party.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jun/02/bnp-far-right-letter

I have slightly amended the text to make it reflect reality a bit more clearly as below ;


We love Britain precisely because it made us rich.

The British National party and its allies are a threat to everything that makes us proud of this country and everything we profit from. The media is working hard to conceal BNP popularity because it knows that people in Britain totally accept its politics of patriotism and nationalism.

But The BNP's record is clear: unlike the Labour government it has never passed any laws that criminalised free speech, created a surveillance society, brought in ID cards, started two illegal foreign wars, bombed the Serbs and slaughtered Iraqi's - though it would have if it had been elected into power, probably or perhaps not.

Nick Griffin, the leader of the BNP, was found guilty of inciting racial hatred in 1998, as a result of a political prosecution authorised by the Attorney General who was a Labour party appointee, the same as most political dissidents in nations ruled by criminals are found guilty of thought and free speech crimes by their own governments at some time.

He denied that the Holocaust ever took place and though he has since recanted that statement made 20 years ago, made at the same time Jack Straw was in the Communist Party and working with the enemies of Great Britain, the Soviet Union. He also does not believe that the Jews, as opposed to individual members of the Jewish community, are conspiring to brainwash white British people.

Though of course we support free speech except when people say something we do not want them to say and even the UAF have described Gerry Gable of Searchlight as a Zionist and Searchlight a Zionist front group. Rupert Murdoch and Richard Desmond are both Jewish and both use their papers to tell total lies about the BNP, so some individual Jews as well as some individual non-Jews, Like The Barclay Brothers and Viscount Rothermere also tell lies about the BNP. But we mention the Jews as we like to play the anti-semitism card against the BNP, when we really know the majority of anti-semites are within the Labour Party and the Left wing of politics.

We consider Griffin's views to be not only racist but fascist, but we do not consider the Labour party war criminals or Corporate Fascists in bed with the Corporate Media or racists for kicking the Diego Garcians out of their own country: he has previously described the BNP as "a strong, disciplined organisation with the ability to back up its slogan 'defend rights for whites' with well-directed boots and fists. When the crunch comes, power is the product of force and will, not of rational debate". Unlike the BNP though the Labour government can use the British Army to bomb, shell and blitz any countries they order them to invade and steal their oil, even if those British soldiers are heroes being misled by corrupt, money stealing donkeys. Therefore when the Labour government use violence they use it in a particularly spectacular and insidious way on the media for electoral gain and to profit themselves and the corporations that fund the Labour Party and therefore that makes it alright.

A vote for the BNP is a vote against everything that makes this country great, such as our ability to make lots of money. We are determined to vote on 4 June: please join us in voting for a great Britain and keeping the political pig we support in power.


Muffin The Mule (puppet)
Sooty and Sweep (two puppets)
Stalin (dictator)
Chairman Mao (dictator)
Pete Doherty (Junkie)
Gordon Brown (war criminal)
Eddie Izzard ( fag hag)
Charlie Brooker (constipated journalist)
Chris Martin (shite singer)
Murel Gray (Bollinger Bolshevik Media Whore)
Danniel Hannan (slaphead)
David Cameron (fop)
Peter Hitchens (Undercover Trotskyite)
Rowland the Rat (Labour Party press spokeman)
Nigel Farage (Drunk crook)
One legged man in arse kicking competition (ukip MEP)

Charlie Brooker - Rockabilly Dickhead

Here are some poems from a collection I am writing, let me know if you like them ;



I cannot Sleep Tonight.


I cannot sleep tonight,
My mind is restless, meandering,
The lost paths of the past,
As a fox in the forest, it roams,
Seeking a den of dreams,
In midnights brush of black,
Wandering memories way,
Sniffing amidst the humus,
Of moments shed in time,
That reek of secrets, long secreted,
Into autumn folds of forgetting.


Suddenly a hare breaks cover,
From a tangled thicket of thought,
White as fresh winter snow,
Bewitching me with her beauty,
Symbolically, she sprints,
Her shadow finding its form,
And fox follows in swift pursuit,
His hot, hungry breath upon her neck,
Seeks reunion with her flesh,
And so the chase begins,
For as it must, fox must be fed.


She leaps and jinks a leading line,
Leading dull fox a merry dance,
Until balled up paws, clagged with clay,
Betray her with a sudden stumble,
And with a snap of jaw it is over,
The chase comes to its end,
And hare surrenders her soul,
With a bright blush of blood,
That cools and clots upon the page,
As fox gnaws upon the bones,
Devouring her sleek pelt, a perfect poem.





Gaza.



I watched as F16 jet fighters flew over Gaza,
Bombing city streets at friday prayer,
Thousands were on their knees, each defiant,
Not a single one raised a head, nor an eye,
To watch them as they streaked across the sky,
Whilst from nearby streets rockets were firing,
As she resistance threw stones at tanks,
For that is faith in all its fatal beauty.


But to not unleash those bombs,
Upon the enemy on their knees below,
To resist the temptation to kill,
To pour down fire upon the heads,
Until not one remains to breath,
That is the duty owed to ones nation,
In all its well disciplined glory.

For if the situation were reversed,
Would those oppressed so defer,
From pulling at the killing trigger,
And wiping from the face of the earth,
The eternal enemy of the Zionist entity ?
No, and no again, a thousand years or more,
As the hand of history so records,
Writ with a bloody pen upon those sands,
For all to see and for all to ignore.

The Guardian - RACIST LEFTIST SCUM

Here are two stories. One is from The Guardian and the other The News of The World.

Today the Guardian ran an editorial attacking the BNP here ;

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/may/03/editorial-bnp-politics


The first story below is written by an ignorant, racist black journalist who works for The Guardian and the second is about the white victim of a racist rape who has bravely spoken out about her ordeal.

All these stories reveal so much about society.

The editorial of the The guardian (link above) reveals that The Guardian calls the BNP racist for standing up for the interests of our people.

The stories below reveal how the media and especially the Guardian are run and staffed by some of the most demented, arrogant, absurd, racist idiots on the planet whilst the final story below reveals the reality of our social situation - one that we are called racist for by the Guardian and its cabal of parasites who live in an middle class, ideological Ivory Tower and who believe that the racist crimes committed against our people do not exist and are simply 'BNP racist nonsense' .

It is a tale of two worlds - one world where white cringing leftists listen too, genuflect too and obey without thought the utter ideological bullshit of radical blacks who use the Marxist-Leninist terrorism of the word 'racism' in order to extort and demand money, status and privileges they do not deserve on the grounds of their talents or intelligence from our society.

The other world is the real world - the world of anti-white racist child rapes, black racism, anti-white racist violence, of rapes of white women by black thugs and illegal immigrants entering our country deliberately to rape white women.

Yet those who seek to defend and give a voice to our white daughters, wives and children and protect them from these ethnic criminals are called racist by the Guardian even for daring to speak of the issue.

One day we will hold the Guardian, its staff and the entire liberal elite to account for their crimes against our people and their collaboration in the crimes against humanity of the liberal Establishment who allowed, encouraged and profited from allowing scum like those below into our country.




http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2002/jul/03/raceintheuk.comment


Of course all white people are racist

Only by acknowledging the influence of subliminal stereotypes can we eradicate their pernicious effects

Joseph Harker The Guardian, Wednesday 3 July 2002

When the head of the crown prosecution service said he believed almost all British people were racist, he was roundly condemned. It was a moment of political correctness gone mad, commentators said. But one thing no one seems to have paused to consider was the possibility that he was right. In fact, what about: all white people are racist.

I don't mean they are all wilful bigots, of course. But racism is a combination of prejudice and power. And sadly prejudice is a deeply ingrained human trait.

Globally, white people are the dominant group, and in politics, economics, the media and all aspects of society, this power is used every day. It starts from the top and filters down to white people everywhere, regardless of their individual economic situation.

At the highest level, when President Bush tells Palestinians a different leader must take the place of the man they elected, he's treating them as second-class human beings. When the leaders of western economic powers deny fair trading terms to African countries, they are doing exactly the same. And the images of these pathetic victims help fuel more stereotypes about their "inferior" status.

Every day the white power structure - be it global, national or local - makes decisions which impinge on the lives of black people. Take the Metropolitan police, who last year decided to allow people to go unpunished if caught smoking dope in Brixton, south London. This scheme was brought in without the backing of the local black population, who fear the effect on their children of scenes of overt drug taking. If the police want to experiment with drugs, why choose black people as guinea pigs?

The actions of those in power create a constant drip of negative images which seep into the national consciousness. Why is it that every time a TV news report mentions unemployment, or school exclusions, or crime statistics you are virtually guaranteed to see a black face? Black and Asian people are seen far less often on reports on the health service, for example, where they make up a high proportion of nurses and doctors. Do you question it each time? Has this negative imagery become normalised in your own mind?

Only last week, a train crash in Tanzania which killed 200 people received the tiniest of mentions in the media. The Times ran a paragraph in its "In Brief" column. What impression does this give about the value of black life?

But the media is not entirely to blame. It is a chicken-and-egg situation in which editors know that their readers care less for non-white lives - they see the evidence in their sales - and hence devote less time and effort to covering them. Which makes the hypocrisy of their response to the crown prosecutor all the more stark.

And despite changes since the Stephen Lawrence inquiry - with black faces now regularly seen on TV in adverts and as presenters - the negative imagery still persists. Take the World Cup, where Egyptian and Ecuadorian referees were treated as second-rate, yet the Scottish official who missed a blatant goal-line handball was still somehow up to the job.

Some "non-racists" like to pretend that racial differences don't exist - they even proudly claim not to notice skin colour. This is manifest nonsense. Purporting to be "colour blind" is as ludicrous as suggesting you wouldn't notice a person's gender. What's important is what you do, not what you see.

It is naive to believe that the long history of racial distortion - which goes back to the days of slavery and colonialism - has not had a lasting effect on the individual subconscious. We receive these messages virtually from birth, and as children's thought processes develop, they build up into a bank of subliminal stereotypes. A black man and white man walking down the street: Which one is the doctor? Which one is good at sport? Which one does drugs?

Reaching adulthood, how can people realistically cast off all they've come to believe as a child? Even black people themselves are not immune, and these images have had an impact on their own self-esteem.

White people need to accept that, no matter how many anti-racist demos they've marched on, they inevitably make assumptions, however subconscious, which are influenced by a racist society and which help to form their views and opinions. To refute this is to be in complete denial. But this is not a blame game. Institutional racism is now an accepted term, but it's not the inanimate "institutions" which are racist; it's their staff who perpetuate the overall inequalities by their actions. The acknowledgement of personal racism is simply a prerequisite before anyone can begin to eradicate its pernicious effects.

As a black man, I admit I am bound to suffer from prejudices of my own. I cannot be racist, however, because in the global order I do not belong to the dominant group. If I were to mistreat a white person, no matter how low in social status, the weight of this country's white power structure would come down against me. As Stephen Lawrence's parents found, this force does not come to the aid of black people.

And how could I be racist anyway? I assure you, some of my best friends are white.

joseph.harker@guardian.co.uk


Story 2 ;


http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/287414/Sarah-Douglas-waives-right-to-anonymity-to-tell-how-she-was-raped-by-immigrant-Amos-Moobeng.html


Raped because I'm white

Victim targeted by immigrant


FURY: Sarah wants attacker deported now


RAPIST: Moobeng went on run


By Jane Atkinson, 03/05/2009

A DEVASTATED young mum has told how she was raped by an illegal immigrant - because he enjoyed hurting white girls.

Brave Sarah Douglas waived her right to anonymity to relive her terrifying ordeal at the hands of Amos Moobeng and stormed: "This racist should be shipped back home to rot in jail."


Sarah, 20, came forward after the South African was sentenced to nine years in prison for holding her hostage before raping her after she went to his flat with a pal.


The judge told the court Moobeng, 35, "deliberately targeted two white females".


But Sarah believes the monster has not been punished enough. "It makes me sick to think that this evil man came over specifically to rape and assault white girls," she said. "He should be booted out of the country.


Justice

"Instead, while he has shattered my life, he has the dream life he came here for - a comfy bed, a TV to watch whenever he likes and hot food three times a day. Where is the justice in that?"


Police figures have revealed that immigrants are carrying out one in six rapes in Britain - and an astonishing one in THREE in London. And last month it was revealed Romanian Ali Majlat attacked a British woman so he could go to jail because his rapist elder brother wrote to him saying how cushy life was in our prisons.


Moobeng was on the run after his visa ran out when he targeted Sarah and her pal at a hotel bar in Exeter.


"He came over with his friend Benson and was being very over the top and flirting with my friend," said Sarah. "I was pleased for her. She'd been single for a long time so I went along with it when he suggested we go to a club."


She only found out through Benson's trial evidence why Moobeng was so interested. "He said Moobeng had been making fun of me and my friend as soon as he saw us because we were white. He wanted to hurt us because we were white."


Six-footer Moobeng then invited the girls back to his flat for a nightcap. It was there he pounced. Sarah said: "He jumped on top of me and started kissing my neck but I kicked him off. I told my friend I wanted to go home before storming into the bathroom.


"The next thing Amos literally ripped the bathroom door from its hinges and shouted, 'Get out of there now'. Then I saw him grab my friend and whack her round the face three times. I screamed at him to leave her alone. He just stared at me." The girls fled the flat but in the panic Sarah lost her pal. She made the mistake of going back to find her. Moobeng was waiting.


"I heard the locks turn on the front door behind me when I went inside. He grabbed my wrist and pulled me upstairs into a bedroom. He locked that door too. I was screaming, crying and kicking.


"He slapped me around the face and then ripped off my clothes and raped me.


Grabbed

"All I could do was shut my eyes and scream and scream. He was so strong and no matter what I did I just couldn't free myself. I thought I was going to die.


"Afterwards I ran towards the window to try and jump out but he grabbed me and threw me back on to the bed.


"I kicked and screamed but he pinned me up against the wall and punched and punched at me until eventually I must have passed out." When she came to, she ran out of the flat to discover police - called by her friend - waiting.


Their sniffer dogs found Moobeng crouching behind the building but when arrested he gave a false name. He later jumped bail after the attack in 2007 but was tracked down to Edinburgh.


He was convicted of rape, false imprisonment and assault. Moobeng was also ordered to sign the Sex Offenders Register for life and was told he would be deported after serving his sentence.


Now Sarah is trying to piece her life back together and has managed to find love since the attack. She and her partner Dave Koker, 23, have just had a baby girl.


"I'm trying to move on, but I still have nightmares," she said. "If I hear a man with a foreign accent I shake with fear.


"That man was pure evil and should never have been allowed into this country to attack me in the first place."