Tuesday, 14 July 2009

Immigrant Criminals say Britains Borders are a JOKE

The report can be downloaded here ;


http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/whatsnew1.html


http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/113769/Britain-s-such-a-soft-touch-say-the-people-smugglers-


BRITAIN’S SUCH A SOFT TOUCH SAY THE PEOPLE SMUGGLERS



LOW RISK: 45 prisoners suggested that Britain was high profit and low risk for crimes such as smugglING

Tuesday July 14,2009

By Macer hall CRIMINALS are convinced that Britain’s border controls are “soft” and that police are tolerant of the vice trade, according to a Home Office report that was kept secret for three years.


A series of interviews with convicted sex traffickers and people smugglers in British jails revealed that they were lured here by the “healthy profits” to be made from cross-border crime.

The foreign inmates boasted that sneaking illegal immigrants and sex-slave prostitutes into Britain was ­“relatively easy” and carried a “low risk of detection”.

The research, carried out in 2006, was finally released yesterday in a report entitled: Organised immigration crime – a post-conviction survey.

Its publication provoked a massive row, as critics claimed the disturbing findings had been suppressed.

Tory immigration spokesman Damian Green questioned why the report had “only been made public today”.

He said: “It is a sad fact that people engaged in the dreadful crime of human trafficking do find our borders relatively easy to cross.

“This is one of the reasons a Conservative government would introduce a ­specialist Border Police Force, so that around the world criminals would know that we were toughening up Britain’s borders.”

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the population think tank Migrationwatch, said: “This report lifts the lid on how our border controls are perceived by those who they are meant to deter.”

Home Office researchers interviewed 45 prisoners in British jails, all convicted of people smuggling or trafficking offences during 2005. The report said: “The picture ­present­ed by the perp­etrators was of a market that conferred healthy profits with a low risk of detection.”

Traffickers said the UK was regarded as having a “liberal” policy towards migrants and asylum seekers. They said potential profits from trafficking into the UK were “considerable” and outweighed the risks.

However, some did express “genuine surprise” at the length of sentences handed out by courts, said the report.

The Home Office said the fact that those interviewed were in prison was proof that criminals were being caught.


















Add to Technorati Favorites

The Peter Herbert File - Judge and Racist Black Supremacist Supporter

Peter Herbet the chair of the Soceity of Black Lawyers is a supporter of Loius Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam - a religion that calls white people ' devils, pigs and evil' and Judaism 'a gutter religion'.

Yet Peter Herbert, even though he has twice been reprimanded by the Bar Council, was appointed to be a judge hearing cases against white people. It appears that when it comes to non-whites a different standard applies as per your ability to get a promotion or be allowed to keep your job.

This is a man who supports an organisation that is racist against whites, yet he is allowed to hear cases against white people at the same time the hypocritical bastard is attacking the BNP for being 'racist'.

Yet again it appears that racism is okay, and racists tolerated, if they are not white and their racism is directed against whites.






Peter Herbert twice found guilty of breaking code of conduct for barristers yet allowed to keep his job as he is able to use his cabal of contacts to scream 'wacism' at the Bar Council until they back down ;

http://www.corruptlawyers.co.uk/peter_herbert.aspx

Outrage over 'travesty of justice' as barrister Peter Herbert is found guilty By Lester Holloway

25/5/2004

SUPPORTERS OF barrister and part-time judge Peter Herbert reacted with fury today after a disciplinary hearing found him guilty of breaking the lawyers' code of conduct.

In a shock decision the Bar Council found Peter Herbert guilty of speaking in the 'first person' in a radio interview, using the words "I think" and "I believe" instead of "my client believes."

Peter Herbert called the decision a "travesty of justice" by a "kangaroo court", and plans to appeal. He has already lodged an employment tribunal claim against the Bar Council alleging race discrimination and victimisation, and is likely to sue the individual members of the disciplinary panel, Roger Bartlett, Timothy Lyons QC and Professor Roger Caplin.

Peter Herbert escaped having his license to practice law suspended but received a reprimand and was ordered to receive 'media training.' He has refused to undertake the training.

Peter Herbert claimed his style of advocacy had often involved speaking in the first person and that he was subjected to a hostile radio interview while in a state of distress over a family tragedy.

Peter Herbert was cleared of similar charges in 2001 following a public outcry at the Bar Council's previous attempt to discipline him. His supporters believe the real reason for the disciplinary actions is not the 'tense' he speaks in, but his willingness to challenge racism in the legal profession.




Peter also sought to use his influence to allow Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam to come into Britain ;

http://www.mpa.gov.uk/committees/mpa/2002/020228/minutes/

Louis Farrakhan.

Peter Herbert commented that in his view the proposed visit to England represented no public order danger. The Commissioner commented that this was a matter for the Home Secretary.




http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/climbie-barrister-broke-rules-564750.html

A black barrister involved in the Victoria Climbie inquiry was found guilty yesterday of breaching the Bar Council's code of conduct by expressing his own opinions to the media.

Peter Herbert was found guilty after his client, the social worker Carol Baptiste, was convicted of contempt of court and fined £500 for failing to give evidence into the public inquiry into Victoria's death. In a radio interview after the fallout from the inquiry into the death of the eight-year-old, Mr Herbert described the verdict as "institutional racism".

Lord Laming, who conducted the Climbie inquiry, complained to the Bar Council, claiming Mr Herbert's views were his own and therefore broke the barristers' code of conduct.




Peter Herbet represents Muslims charged with terrorism ;

http://artsweb.bham.ac.uk/bmms/1996/02february96.html

Terrorist charges

Three Muslims, all former students in Manchester, who are charged with terrorist offences are likely to be acquitted in a trial at Manchester Crown Court. Faisal Moustafa, 32, is charged with conspiracy to cause an explosion, possession and control of an explosive substance and possessing a firearm. Shifhur Rehman, 23, and Iftikar Satter, 25, are both charged with conspiracy to cause an explosion and possession of an explosive substance. The black barrister and campaigner Peter Herbert is lead counsel for the defence (Q-News 16.02.96). [BMMS February 1996 Vol. IV, No. 2, p. 9]



Peter Herbet visits shoe bomber Richard Reid in prison - even though he is not a client of his ;


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/aug/24/alqaida.terrorism

In December 2001 I received a call from the mother of Richard Reid, the failed shoe-bomber. Reid had been arrested after trying to blow a passenger jet out of the sky en route from Paris to the United States. He had attempted to detonate explosives hidden in the hollowed-out sole of his shoe. Mrs Reid needed help in dealing with the fallout from her son's attempt at mass murder: for her, a librarian from a small town in the West Country, this was an unusually dark and unfamiliar world.
She contacted me through the Society of Black Lawyers and asked for advice on how to handle the media; she also wondered if there was any way I could check up on her son and his welfare, as he was now incarcerated in the US as one of the country's most notorious prisoners. I contacted British officials in the US and by February 2002 it was agreed that I could visit Reid in jail.














Add to Technorati Favorites

BNP Report - centre for social cohesion

The Centre for Social Cohesion have just released a report that can be downloaded here at Harrys Place about the 'BNP'. Of course its not about the BNP, nor is a 'report' as it is based on a mixture of bullshit, selective quotes and distortions - but hey folks its still fun to read.

Link Here ;

http://www.hurryupharry.org/2009/07/14/centre-for-social-cohesion-bnp-report/#comment-366617

Those of you new to this blog will be pleased to know that it contains some of my own writings (with selective quotes taken out of context of course).

The writer of this report Edmund Standing, a guy named after a metaphor for an erect penis, who is also one of Harrys Place regulars - and it appears that people like the Social for Social Cohesion are prepared to pay for any old bollocks as long as it attacks the BNP.

Here is Edmunds blog at Jewcy.com ;

http://www.jewcy.com/user/3956/edmund_standing


Jewcy is an online magazine and user community that also promotes Jewish theater and sells a Jewcy-branded range of apparel. The site was launched on November 15, 2006.[1] The Guardian has described Jewcy as "a cultural icon" and "at the forefront of a reinvention of Jewish identity by young US Jews."[2]

Jewcy has attracted controversy within the Jewish community for its irreverent Jewish "lifestyle products," including t-shirts that bear the slogan "Shalom, motherfucker." [3] The New York Times has described Jewcy as part of "the Jewish Hipster movement" [4].

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewcy

So we can safely assume that Edmund is a Zionist, Jewish and also a Neo-Conservative stooge and also an apologist for the illegal Iraq War started by the international corporate fascist elite who serve the interest of the Banksters and the Zionists.

Therefore he is simply being paid to peddle bullshit that benefits himself and his Zionist, neo-con, Israeli buddies.

It is rather odd that a pro-Zionist / neo-conservative right wing aligned group like the Centre will hire a writer from a (pseudo)left wing website like Harrys Place whose focus is pro-Iraq War Leftism - unless the linkage between them is that Edmund Standing and Harrys Place are more a paid operatives of the pro-war Neo-Conseratives who are acting to ensure the pro-war effluent and agenda of the Neo-Conservatives is pumped into the left.

Therefore Harrys Place is a front group for the Neo-Conservatives that acts to support the pro-war agenda and ideology of neo-conservatism via organising the elements of the left that support the aims of the neo-conservatives such as the Iraq War.

So lets see who runs the Centre for Social Cohesion ;

Baroness Cox - Conservative peer in the House of Lords and whining liberal ; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Cox,_Baroness_Cox

Ruth Dudley Edwards - Lefty academic ;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Dudley_Edwards

Note that Mrs. Edwards wrote a peice in The Guardian attacking the Ken Loach film 'The wind that shakes the Barley', without even seeing the film ! This was an unfortunate mistake on her part as most of Ken Loach's films are leftist self indulgent twaddle glorifying ( as only the self loathing rich middle class liberal and leftist can) the working class and socialism. Yet The Wind That Shakes The Barley is in fact a superb film and deserved every award it got. This is because it revealed the schism in the Republican movement that led to members of the IRA in power in Eire shooting other members of the IRA who had declared war on their own people.



Douglas Murray - Apologist for the Iraq War and professed Neo-Conservative scumbag and Zionist stooge. In 2005 he published a defence of neoconservatism, Neoconservatism: Why We Need It and undertook a related promotional tour of the United States. During the course of this tour he gave an interview to the New York Sun in which he outlined his "instinctive" support for Israel and was dubbed a "self-described neoconservative and Zionist" as well as "Britain's only neoconservative."[9]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Murray_(author)




Dr. John Marks - ex-scientist . Retired.

http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/NHS60/Pages/JohnHenryMarks.aspx

http://www.dcscience.net/?p=44


Melanie Phillips of The Spectator has described the Centre as "invaluable"[13] and the Telegraph's Damian Thompson describes Murray as the Centre's "brilliant young director" in his Daily Telegraph blog.

Therefore we can see that the centre is front group for a cabal of neo-con reactionary retards who are paid to follow the line of the present corporate media elite and the internationalist institutions that are usurping our national sovereignity.

The fact the centre employs such a shit researcher as Edmund Standing, whose only skill appears to be a talent for cutting and pasting selective quotes taken out of context from the internet, reveals just how desperate the Centre is and how easy it is to be called a 'researcher' these days.

It appears that the Centre funded the report in order to ensure its Pro-Zionist, Pro-Neo-conservative and anti-Islam bias were given a fig leaf of ambiguity by commissioning an anti-BNP report.

Yawn !

Monday, 13 July 2009

Stormfront Exposed

For a few years now I have been saying that the security and integrity of sites such as Stormfront have been comprimised, and that many of the various extremists that post on it and other sites, are working for various governments, red groups and police organisations.

Here the Canadian government appointed Human Rights body, the simpering equivalent of the Equality Commission in the UK, are proved to have been posting on sites such as Stormfront in order to incite racism in Canada so that the existence of such racism in Canada then justifies their existence.

If the Canadians are doing it - how many other governments are doing it too ?

The fact that many sincere nationalists of many countries post on sites like Stormfront and exchange their private details with people they have never met, have no idea of their real identity and no records of their past activities means sites like Stormfront are primarily tools that benefit the enemies of nationalism.

Ever wondered why sites like Stormfront are never taken down from the internet ? Its because they are doing the work of the enemies of nationalism for them.

Note also that members of the Canadian Jewish Congress were also joining neo-nazi groups - with one member of the Canadian Jewish Congress actually RUNNING one group - in order for the neo-nazi 'threat' to exist in Canada the only way such a group could operate, because its own members were so stupid and inept, was for a member of the Jewish Congress to become the de facto leader of the nazi group and run it for the nazis !


Link here - http://www.prisonplanet.com/canadian-jewish-congress-organized-nazi-party.html


This is the reality of 'the threat from far right extremism' - that it is a Falsde Flag manufactured threat used by governments and people in organisations like 'human rights bodies' in order to justify their own existence.

The proof is now here ;



http://ezralevant.com/2009/07/jennifer-lynch-is-a-damned-lia.html




The mother of all lies

But all of this pales in comparison to the mother of all lies told by Lynch, that:

Nor did commission investigators post hateful messages on the Internet.

She sort of sneaks that in there, doesn't she? Almost tries to blend it in with her other lies about false exonerations.

That's the biggest, most damning lie of all.

It's the lie that will, in the end, cost Lynch her job.

Because the Canadian public -- and even this risk-averse minority Conservative government -- cannot tolerate the truth about Lynch's activities: her staff are members of neo-Nazi organizations, and conduct themselves as if they are Nazis, including by writing hundreds, if not thousands, of bigoted comments on the Internet.

And that truth is starting to come out.

This March, the truth came out with a trumpet blast: the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal -- the rubber-stamp kangaroo court that has given the CHRC a 100% conviction rate -- issued a rare and damning opinion of Lynch's staff's Nazi memberships. The Tribunal said that the conduct of Richard Warman -- the former CHRC investigator who has since been the complainant in all but two censorship prosecutions by the CHRC, and whose expenses are paid for by the CHRC to this day -- were "disappointing", "disturbing" and inexcusable.

What conduct was that? Publishing bigoted hate speech online -- precisely what Lynch denies.

Here's the Tribunal, at paragraph 63:

I do not see any acceptable reason for Mr. Warman to have participated on the Stormfront or Vanguard sites, since there appears to be ample easily obtained messages on these sites available without his involvement. Moreover, it is possible that his activity in this regard, could have precipitated further hate messages in response. His explanation for including other hate messages in his postings by mistake seems very weak to me.

Warman was a CHRC investigator, and he is the CHRC's essential partner in their ongoing prosecutions. Without Warman, there would have been only two censorship prosecutions in the past decade.

Now, pathological liars like Lynch look for technicalities, hairs to split, any mental reservation by which they can pretend the lies they tell are the truth. Lynch, for example, might think, "well, Warman is the center of our censorship prosecutions, and we pay his expenses, and he still has a hand in CHRC investigations even though he no longer works here, but he isn't technically a CHRC investigator, so his Nazi activities aren't on our head."

She could say that.

But it wouldn't save her from being a damned liar.

Because Warman's Nazi antics started before he left the CHRC in July of 2004. He was on staff while he spread his hate.

Warman's serial bigotry

Here is a list of a some comments made by Warman on Nazi websites like Vanguard and Stormfront. You can see the dates, and click through to .pdfs of the posts themselves. You can even go online on those websites, to this day, and read Warman's bigotry. Warman admits to authoring each and every one of those bigoted remarks, except the one bigoted comment about Sen. Cools, which he denies. (Here's my reply to that denial).

Some of Warman's comments are just mindless chatter. But some of them are the very definition of bigotry, from praise for Nazi leaders ("I still say Arcand is our man!") to call for anti-black policing ("exactly when will white cops understand that they should stand by THEIR race?!") to trashing Jewish youth groups ("if people spent the time building fellow WNs [White Nationalists] up rather than tearing them down we'd be dangerous. Unless your goal is to tear people down in which case go join Hillel or something.")

Each of the above (and more) comments were published by Warman when he was a CHRC employee. Of course, he's published so many more since then, under so many fake names, he admits he can't even remember all of his Nazi aliases. Note: he says he can't even remember all of his aliases, let alone all the Nazi posts he makes under those aliases.

Dean Steacy is a Nazi member too

It's not just Warman, of course. Many other CHRC staff to this day maintain membership in neo-Nazi organizations. According to sworn testimony by the CHRC, up to eight CHRC staff have access to these Nazi memberships. As Dean Steacy, CHRC censor, admitted under oath last year, it was Lord of the Flies over there -- there were no rules whatsoever on the use of Nazi memberships. See page 5827 of the transcript:

Ms. Kulaszka: Are there any guidelines for investigators about what kind of posts they can make using aliases?

Mr. Steacy: No.

Pretty straightforward. No wonder Lynch tried to have that hearing closed to the media.

Steacy declares his white pride

So what did Steacy himself do using his neo-Nazi membership? (Again, stop and think how insane it is that government employees at something called a human rights commission are joining neo-Nazi groups as part of their job. I guess even Nazis need stimulus programs.)

Here's a little exchange between Steacy, using his "Jadewarr" membership in neo-Nazi groups, and something called B.C. White Pride. Steacy:

praises their white supremacism;

offers to distribute white supremacist literature;

offers to send over copies of his own white supremacist literature; and

says the white supremacist literature he received was "great".


Let's take for granted -- God, I hope so -- that Steacy didn't actually put up any of those white supremacist posters. He was still communicating support and encouragement to those who were doing so.

But the real point of Steacy's foolishness of course, was the entrapment -- something that is illegal at real police forces.

Oh -- and that Jadewarr account was the one that Steacy, Warman and Giacomo Vigna used to hack Nelly Hechme's Internet account.

Jennifer Lynch is a damned liar.

Jennifer Lynch is a liar.

She lies about many things -- more all the time.

Politics tolerates a lot of lies.

But her lie denying her staff's bigoted comments on Nazi websites?

That's the lie that is going to get her fired.









Add to Technorati Favorites

Blue Eyes Mean You Are More Intelligent

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/science/sciencenews/3304030/Blue-eyes-could-mean-you-are-brainy.html


Blue eyes could mean you are brainy

By Sophie Borland
Published: 12:01AM BST 20 Aug 2007

Bright blue eyes have long been viewed as a quality that can help to attract the opposite sex. Now research suggests having piercing blue eyes may also say something positive about your level of intelligence.

Scientists believe they may have the explanation for why the likes of Stephen Hawking, Alexander Fleming, Marie Curie, and now Lily Cole are such brilliant academics - and it's all in the eyes.


Maria CurcioAmerican researchers have found that blue-eyed people are more studious and are able to concentrate harder and outperform brown-eyed individuals in exams.

They are also likely to be more strategic thinkers who are able to plan their own time enabling them to work more effectively.

In return, those with brown eyes are likelier to be faster at running enabling them to be more likely to succeed in sports such as football, hockey and rugby.

The study, carried out by scientists at the University of Louisville, in Kentucky, could explain why so many academic geniuses have blue eyes.

Stephen Hawking, one of the world's most eminent physicists and author of A Brief History of Time, has bright blue eyes as did Alexander Fleming, the biologist who discovered penicillin, and Marie Curie, who was twice given a Nobel prize for her pioneering work in radioactivity.

Lily Cole, the catwalk model whose features are dominated by her piercing blue eyes, recently secured a place at Kings College, Cambridge to read social and political sciences having gained five As at A level.

Another prominent blue-eyed mastermind is Stephen Fry, the author, actor and TV presenter, who gained a scholarship to Cambridge University.

The research may also explain why many of our top sportsmen such as John Terry, the England football captain, and Jonny Wilkinson, the former England rugby captain, are brown-eyed.

The scientists say that there is no logical explanation for the link between eye colour and academic achievement, but it is an unexplored area of research.

















Add to Technorati Favorites

Sunday, 12 July 2009

Charlie Brooker - You have been watching review









Image - Charlie Brooker and Parker from Thunderbirds. Related or just strange quirk of fate that they resemble one another so much ?



Review of Charlie Brookers 'You have been watching '.

Crap.

































Add to Technorati Favorites

Council Housing = the facts

http://www.researchonline.org.uk/fskills/search/go.do?action=document&ref=B6326


Table 5.13. Proportion of population living in social housing, by country of birth,
2005/06

Rank / Country of birth / Living in local authority or housing association housing


1= Australia 5%
1= France 5%
1= USA 5%
4= Poland 8%
4= India 8%
4= South Africa 8%
4= Canada 8%
8 China 9%
9 Italy 10%
10 Kenya 12%
11 Sri Lanka 14%
12= Pakistan 15%
12= Philippines 15%
14 Cyprus 16%
15 UK 17%
16 Zimbabwe 20%
17= Republic of Ireland 21%
17= Uganda 21%
19 Nigeria 29%
20 Iran 33%
21 Jamaica 35%
22 Ghana 39%
23 Portugal 40%
24 Bangladesh 41%
25 Turkey 49%
26 Somalia 80%

So 80 % of Somalians are in council housing.



Table 5.14.

Proportion of workforce employed in public services among the
economically-active working-age population, by country of birth, 2005/06

Rank / Country of birth / Public administration and defence / Education, Health and social work / Other community, social and personal / Total public services

1 Philippines 5% 4% 49% * 60%
2= Jamaica 7% 8% 29% 6% 50%
2= Nigeria 9% 8% 27% 7% 50%
4 Zimbabwe 6% 6% 33% 4% 49%
5 Somalia * * 30% * 48%
6 Canada 7% 13% 13% 12% 46%
7 Ghana 7% 5% 24% 4% 40%
8 Cyprus 8% 13% 10% 8% 39%
9= Republic of Ireland 5% 10% 19% 4% 38%
9= Australia 8% 9% 13% 8% 38%
11 Uganda 7% 6% 22% * 37%
12 USA 8% 13% 5% 11% 36%
13 South Africa 5% 9% 15% 6% 35%
14= UK 8% 9% 12% 5% 34%
14= India 4% 6% 20% 4% 34%
16 Kenya 7% 8% 14% 5% 33%
17 France 5% 15% 6% 5% 31%
18 Italy 3% 10% 10% 5% 29%
19 China 3% 9% 11% 5% 28%
20 Iran * 10% * * 24%
21 Portugal * 6% 10% 7% 23%
22 Sri Lanka 6% 4% 11% * 22%
23 Bangladesh 5% 3% 10% * 20%
24 Pakistan 3% 5% 9% 2% 19%
25 Poland * 2% 7% 5% 14%
26 Turkey * * * * 11%


So it appears that if it wasnt for public service jobs, employed by the Servile State, most immigrants would be out of work.

Therefore we can see that the increase of the size of the public sector jobs has been designed to employ ethnic minority groups, whilst at the same time 80 % of the new jobs in Britain since new labour came to power have gone to non-indigenous non-British people ;

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-501128/80-new-jobs-gone-migrants-Labour-came-power.html

Migrants have taken four out of five jobs created since Labour came to power, Whitehall analysts have said.

Their verdict was a huge embarrassment to Cabinet ministers, who have claimed most jobs went to Britons.

It brought new criticism for Gordon Brown and his promise of "British jobs for British workers".

The calculation of how many migrant workers there really are in Britain was made by the Statistics Commission, set up by Labour to check the integrity of official figures.

It had been called in by Labour MP Frank Field during a row in October, when ministers were forced to admit their own figures were too low.

The commission said 1.4million workers born abroad had taken jobs in Britain since 1997.

That was 81 per cent of the 1.7million new jobs for people of working age


That means that the aim of the increase in the size of the Servile State was designed to take migrants out of the unemployment / social housing figures in order to create the false perception that migrants are adding to the British economy.

In fact the money that migrants add to the British economy comes mainly from the government via them being employed in public sector jobs - a neat little trick to obscure the reality that without them being employed in public sector jobs the majority of migrants would be out of work and a net drain on the British economy.

One wonders why Migrationwatch hasnt seen how this little trick has been played on us all.

The fact is that if we are to analyse the real economic benefits of migration we have to remove those migrants from the analysis who are paid by the state - as those jobs do not benefit the British economy as the wages of those people are paid for by the British state and their wages are not adding to the size of the economy as the money comes from the British taxpayer.




































Add to Technorati Favorites