Long Lost Member of the Village People Found

At long last the mystery of the vanishing gay biker member of the 1970's super group The Village People has been discovered.

After leaving the band he changed his name to Sir Norman Bettison, then came to England, joined the police and rose through the ranks to become the chief constable of West Yorkshire police.

What a fantastic career change, from a gay icon to a top copper.

But what gave the game away as to his real identity was his ongoing penchant for sinister black uniforms, nice hats and a big gay biker moustache.

Check for yourself the pictures.

Well done to Sir Norman for staying true to his gay power credentials and ensuring the police in the 21st century reflect the diversity of British society today by having a gay biker as a true police role model.

Vroom, Vroom.

All together now ;

" Its fun to stay at the YMCA "
















http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-522967/Police-chief-forces-staff-monitor-Wikipedia-entry-stop-users-posting-rude-comments-him.html


A chief constable has told his staff to monitor online encyclopedia Wikipedia - to stop its users posting rude comments about him.

Sir Norman Bettison took exception to being described as a "greedy, vain moron" on the online encyclopaedia, according to Police Review magazine.

The 52-year-old chief constable of West Yorkshire - favourite to succeed Sir Ian Blair as head of the Met - has ordered employees to check for changes often.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-522967/Police-chief-forces-staff-monitor-Wikipedia-entry-stop-users-posting-rude-comments-him.html#ixzz0xVvyQLco

EDL - Uniforms Law

The absence of a statutory definition of a uniform was overcome in the case of O'Moran V DPP and Whelan V DPP (1975) WLR 413 where it was held that the wearing of just a black beret constituted an uniform.

The EDL wear ;

1) Black Balaclavas
2) Black T-Shirts with the same symbols
3) Congregate in public
4) Carry banners
5) March in the name of the EDL

Therefore if they adopt a political agenda and start to carry banners, chant slogans, issue leaflets and propaganda with political aims and assemble with the intent for for political aims and demonstrate with political aims then they are in breach of the law under Whelan V DPP.

The moment that the EDL adopts a political ideology or political aims then they instantly come under the Public Order Act 1986 and also the revised Terrorism Act which includes acts of violence, criminal damage or intimidation with a political motive.

On every level the moment the EDL adopts a political ideology or starts promoting a political ideology they are screwed.

The EDL - Real Patriots or Undercover Police

Image - here the EDL all stand around posing for nice pictures for the media in their black shirts and uniforms. Now the fact they are getting involved in politics means they can all be arrested for wearing para-military uniforms.

They are falling straight into the trap the media and the police are laying for them - and no doubt many decent real patriots will go down with them when the informers and touts and the idiots start pushing the EDL into politics.





Image - note how the daily star are trying to get the EDL involved in politics and to stand as a political party. The moment they do they can be banned. This is classic media entrapment. And it appears they are falling for it.





Image - photo of muslim rioters, yet this cropped image of the thug in the balaclava was touted in the Dail Star as a member of the EDL. Yet the EDL are wagging their tails with delight at the fact the Daily Star wrote an article on them. Never trust the media, the moment you do - youre screwed.




Image - example of how the media lie. The image above is a picture of a muslim rioter at the Birmingham demo, but the Daily Star said in the article here it was a member of the EDL ;

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view...r-the-defence/






Image - EDL para-military clothing on sale on their website. The moment they get involved in politics the fact they have sold and worn these means they can all be arrested under the Public Order Act 1936.





It has been interesting to watch the growth of the EDL over recent months, and most interesting to see how it is now becoming under the influence of undercover police and government agents.

The recent article in the Daily Star where an EDL spokesman said that the EDL may get involved in politics is evidence of the fact that the organisation has now been infiltrated by the police.

The photographs of the EDL in the Daily Star article burning a swastika flag whilst various members of various races stood around in balaclavas and EDL black shirts with the same symbols on them reminded me of the UVF or the UDA.

Here is where the recent events get murky.

The decison by the EDL to get involved in politics means they are now in breach of the Public Order Act 1936 ;

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1936/cukpga_19360006_en_1

1 Prohibition of uniforms in connection with political objects(1) Subject as hereinafter provided, any person who in any public place or at any public meeting wears uniform signifying his association with any political organisation or with the promotion of any political object shall be guilty of an offence

2 Prohibition of quasimilitary organisations(1)If the members or adherents of any association of persons, whether incorporated or not, are—

(a)organised or trained or equipped for the purpose of enabling them to be employed in usurping the functions of the police or of the armed forces of the Crown; or

(b)organised and trained or organised and equipped either for the purpose of enabling them to be employed for the use or display of physical force in promoting any political object, or in such manner as to arouse reasonable apprehension that
they are organised and either trained or equipped for that purpose;

then any person who takes part in the control or management of the association, or in so organising or training as aforesaid any members or adherents thereof, shall be guilty of an offence under this section:



Therefore the recent announcement by 'spokesmen' of the EDL that they are going to
stand in elections, get involved in politics, have political aims, seek political goals etc means they are now an illegal unlawful organisation and its members and leaders - who wear, sell, display or promote para-military uniforms such as the ones they have been wearing in recent photographs - means they are liable to be arrested.

The fact that 'members' of the EDL are pushing the EDL towards POLITICAL gboals as opposed to solely opposing Islamic extremism means ;

1) The EDL are now an illegal organisation
2) The members and leaders can be arrested for terrorism under the revised Terrorist Act as they are undertaking 'terrorism' for a political motive
3) The EDL can now be arrested for selling, wearing and displaying para-military clothing and also acting as a private army.

The movement of the EDL into politics and away from protest, is either an act of utter stupidity or evidence of the infiltration of the EDL by undercover police who are working to get the organisation banned / proscribed.

The law states that people can wear the clothing that the EDL seem to enjoy wearing legally as long as it is not for a political purpose, therefore the fact that the EDL seems now to be adopting a political wing makes the entire organisation unlawful.

That the EDL now seems to be going through a metamorphise from a protest group into a political group, at the same time as it seeking to expand, is no coincidence.

As long as it remained a single issue protest group against Islamisation, then it remains legal - the moment it embraces political goals it self criminalises itself.

As the police stated a few days ago, they cannot 'ban' EDL demonstrations as they are not POLITICAL events such as those of the NF - this was a clear signal to the EDL that they have appeared to have missed.

The moment they go political and start forming a political wing that stands in elections, campaigns on political issues, has political goals or a political agenda - they will be banned.

This is what the government wants the EDL to do.

It wants the EDL to become political as that way they can ban it, arrest its leaders and send a signal out to angry white youth and patriots that ' the minute you dare protest about what is happening we will smash you and jail you '.

This is why the recent announcements of the EDL that they are going to get involved in politics, with some reports saying they are even going to form a political wing to stand against the BNP in order to demonstrate their 'anti-racist credentials' to the media (who frankly dont give a shit - the idea the EDL or any political party or groups are going to be treated fairly by a media that is incapable of telling the truth is frankly evidence of their utter stupidity and gullability) is a sign the organisation is in crisis.

The burning of swastika flags and anti-racist placards and videos to woo over the media is simply evidence the people running the EDL know nothing about the media.

The media dont tell the truth lads - if the EDL was run by Bob Marley, had One Love as its anthem and waved the rastafari flag it would still be called 'racist' if it opposed Islamism.

Opposing Islamism means you will always be called racist by the media, the UAF and others.

This is because those people in the media who you seek support from, are PAID to tell lies and assist the Islamisation of Britain.

If you cant deal with then then get out of the EDL.

Stop acting like a bunch of big girls and getting upset because the media 'misrepresent' what you stand for.

The media misrepresent what everyone OUTSIDE THE CONFINES OF THE WHORES OF THE MAINSTREAM PARTIES STANDS FOR.

Deal with it.

We hear that members of the EDL have been driven around Oldham and Manchester by chauffer driven limousines by the BBC - and no doubt these limousines will have been fitted with hidden recording devices and cameras to get the comments of the people in the car recorded for a future panorama documentary.

Undercover BBC journalists will already be in the EDL at demonstrations as well as undercover police - and they will be looking for evidence of a political motive in their activities in order to provide evidence to the CPS to ban the EDL.

The moment the EDL start licking the hand of the media they are lost - they will be used and abandoned by the media as soon as they have been filmed talking enough bollocks to get themselves arrested.

Last week Anti-Fascist Action in the UK was raided and its leading members arrested.

So the return to the 1980's 'tit for tat' with C18 V AFA is over - so they now need an excuse to ban the EDL.

The only winner if the EDL goes down a political route is the government - and that is why various members of the EDL have suddenly started about politics.

It is those people, the ones in the ranks of the EDL who are talking about political goals, standing in elections and forming a political wing, who are the ones who will be working for MI5, Special Branch, the media and the police.

The EDL I suspect will start to implode the moment the media and MI5 agents in its ranks massage the ego's of its leaders to the extent that it loses sight of its original purpose - TO OPPOSE ISLAMISM and starts to get involved in politics.

The fact it is now burning swastikas, talking about politics, talking about standing in elections shows it is about to self destruct as it has gone political.

The EDL must therefore be regarded with suspicion - as its transition into politics is either a result of stupidity at the top of the organisation or a sign of infiltration.

Either way Nationalists are warned to stay well clear of it, for it appears to be on a collision course with the law.

UAF BURN UNION JACK IN BIRMINGHAM ANTI-FREE SPEECH RIOTS

Image - a mob of 'Pakis4lyf' attack a lone white male during the Birmingham demonstration. As usual it takes a mob of around twenty to attack a single white teenager - shades of the Oldham and Bradford riots again we see, where lone whites were targeted for attack by asian gangs simply because they were white.




Image - lone white boy attacked, beaten with wooden truncheon and stabbed by asian mob during the Oldham riots of 2001.




Image - an elderly white man attacked by a mob of young Islamist 'Paki4lyf' thugs during the Birmingham demonstration. As usual they have to have a mob to attack one old white man and steal the Union Jack before ripping it up AND THEN BURNING IT IN THE STREET




THE UAF REVEALED - THUGS AND TERRORISTS.

Wherever the UAF turn up and the rent a mob of Islamists, SWP thugs, immigrants and alien colonists they surround themselves appear there is violence.

But the violence that occured yesterday in Birmingham town centre finally ripped the mask from the face of the UAF lies - and luckily the BBBC filmed it all.

Note the comments from a witness to the violence about how the Anti-Islamist demonstrators were simply chanting and then the UAF and Pakis4lyf mobs arrived and started the violence and also burnt the Union Jack ;

" Resident Gary Nichols witnessed the disturbances on Saturday evening from his city centre flat and said he was unable to go outside for about two and a half hours.

"It was very disheartening to see," he told the BBC.

"I've never experienced anything like it before in the three years I've lived here.

"It started off with a group of white guys who were chanting 'England, England'. I thought they were just football fans, but then a larger group of black and Asian people turned up and it all kicked off.

"You had people burning the Union flag. People were being kicked - some of them weren't anything to do with the protests.

"It all seemed to be very systematic - groups were arriving in cars and getting involved in the violence.

"It really wasn't nice to see and I hope I never see it again."



Watch the BBC video here ;


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/8191833.stm


Then note the following ;


1) Salma ' 7/7 was a reprisal attack' Yaqoob of the Respect Party lieing to the crowd that the demonstration was a BNP demonstration and also shouting to the crowd 'our streets'. The streets of Birmingham are not the streets owned by the UAF shower of shit or the Islamist thugs that gathered to attack lone old men carrying Union Jack flags.

This was clearly incitement to violence and public disorder by Salam Yaqoob.

Therefore we will be making a formal request for a police investigation into her actions in regard to inciting the crowd with lies to violence.

As usual we can see that it takes a mob of about 20 young Islamist thugs to attack a lone, elderly white man and rip up the Union Jack - nothing new there then.

Read the testimony of the witness in the BBC report above about how the UAF mob started the violence.


2) Watch the video and note the banners of the demonstrators who were protesting the Islamists - they were all anti-BNP. The anti-Islamist demonstrators were not just anti-BNP, they were a group of whites, blacks, British Indian Hindu and Sikh casuals who were protesting the Islamists.

There was no BNP demonstration.

There were no BNP members at the demonstration.

The BNP does not do street demonstrations.

So finally the bullshit of the UAF is revealed - they use the BNP as a pretext in order to organise mobs to attack those who are undertaking lawful demonstrations on British streets.

Just as the UAF triggered the Oldham and Bradford riots by inflaming the Pakistani community, they have done the same all over the country.

The UAF is nothing more than a collection of Far Left extremists and Islamists linked via the Respect Party and the SWP, who use the BNP and the Far Right to terrorise anyone who dares use their right of free speech to say anything the Stalinists and Islamists in Respect and the SWP do not agree with.

Note how the UAF thugs then attacked whites in Birmingham simpy because they were white.

This shows the real fascist nature of the UAF - that they seek to target for violence old or young, lone white males with the cowardly mobs of thugs they assemble.

The video here made the thugs who call themselves 'Paki4lyf' shows them gloating about the attacks by the asian mobs on lone white youngsters and an old man with a Union Jack ;

http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?&next_url=/watch%3Fv%3DARXsS9Eos44

You have to log in to watch it.


Note how the person who made the video defines themselves as firstly a 'Paki' and also Muslims.

Nothing about them being British of course, which reveals why they tore up the Union Jack - the mob was simply Islamists and 'Pakis4lyf' (as they self define themselves as in the video they hosted on Youtube as 'Pakis4lyf' ) attacking those they thought had come to demand Islamist bombers be taken off our streets.

They see themselves as Pakistanis and Muslims - not as British.

These are the same thugs that we see in Pakistan supporting the Taliban and Islamic terrorism - and with their dual passports these thugs have the right to live in Pakistan as well as Britain and therefore 'pretend' they are British when it suits them - mostly to scream 'Islamophobia' at anyone who accuses them of supporting terrorism and when they claim benefits and council housing in this country.

The rest of the time they self define themselves as 'Pakis4lyf'.

The 'Pakis4lyf' mobs were there to support Islamist violence and terrorism - not to defend democracy or human rights.

The 'Pakis4lyf' at the demonstration were the footsoldiers of Islamist terrorist groups and those like Salma Yaqoob, who are the apologists and propagandists for Islamist terrorists, were there simply to incite violence and public disorder.

But the Police in Birmingham are so up the arse of those like Salma Yaqoob, who acts as a 'Community Spokesperson' for the Islamists, that the Police are too terrified to to arrest them - the police would rather surrender our democracy to the Islamists than face being called 'racist' or 'Islamophobic'.