Showing posts with label Lucy James. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lucy James. Show all posts

Wednesday, 9 September 2009

The Islamaphobic Hokey Cokey

Now you too can sing along with Lucy James and join in with the Islamaphobic Hokey Cokey.

Lyrics here ;



You say Islams a race.

Then you say that its not.

Yes it is.
No its not.

And you say it a lot.

You do the Islamphobic Hokey Cokey and you turn around

And that’s what its all about

Oh the Islamphobic Hokey Cokey


Oh the Islamaphobic Hokey Cokey

Knees bent

Back bowed

Rah Rah Rah

Bang goes the West !











Add to Technorati Favorites

Lucy James - Student With Attitude

Dear old Lucy James, the token wet, white, blond, Dhimmi-liberal Quizling, has popped out of her box amongst the Taqqiya specialists and Islamist Gramscians at the Qulliam Foundation, named after a radical Islamist and home to the Long March Islamists instead of the 'Military Jihadists', and attacked the BNP again.

The aim of the Quilliam Foundation is the same, the conquest of the West, only the methodology is different to the Islamist terrorists.

My responses are prefixed in the article by the = sign.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/6161607/The-BNPs-arguments-should-be-used-against-them.html


Both the BNP and Islamist ideologies thrive on creating divisions. Their arguments need to be robustly and openly challenged, writes Lucy James of the Quilliam Foundation.

By Lucy James
Published: 11:43AM BST 09 Sep 2009

The response of the British security services to what is said would have been Britain’s 9/11, the airline plot , appears to have been both effective and courageous. Unfortunately, certain sections of wider society will no doubt use the incident to attack British Muslim communities as a whole — certain sections being, namely, the BNP and their supporters.

= Aah here we see Lucy play the 'Criticise Islamists and you are the same type of racist, Nazi, fascist as the Bnp' OLD TRICK. Sorry Lucy love, even 'normal' people who arent BNP think that Islamists planning to blow up bombs on airplanes is a very bad thing.

Resorting to crude racism

= Is Islam a race now ? I thought we have been told that Islam is not a race, but now it is. You do the Islamaphobic hokey cokey and you turn around. In out. In out. Islam is a race. No it isnt. Yes it is. And thats what its all about. OI !


is a staple response of the BNP. Since around 2005, the BNP’s rhetoric has become more virulently anti-Muslim;

= Actually the BNP is anti-Islamist, anti-Colonisation and anti-Multiculturalism and antii-political correctness and anti-Dhimmitude not anti-Islam.

Besides have the BNP invaded Iraq and Afghanistan and bombed the shit out of Pakistan - nah, that was those Islam lovers wasnt it. Theres no blood on the hands of us Islamaphobes, only you Islamo-lovers !

manipulating the fears and suspicions surrounding Muslims post 7/7. In the wake of the London Bombings, the BNP issued a leaflet with the image of the exploded bus in Tavistock Square. Below the picture, in language intentionally indicative of a cosmic battle between Christianity and Islam, the leaflet called on people to ‘help the BNP Crusade’.

= What ! How dare we. A crusade against Islamists bombing us. Typical lefty fork tongued bulshit - trying to make people feel sorry for the bombers and go boo hiss at the bad BNP for wanting to deal with the bombers and their supporters, funders and fellow Jihadists. . Twat.




How does Britain solve its identity crisis?At the time of writing, the BNP have yet to respond to the airline bomb plot. No doubt that it will be used to further the BNP’s own racist agenda and the faces of the three convicted terrorists will become commonplace on BNP leafleting campaigns.


= Crikey. Lucy James is also a fortune teller. Is it tea leaves luv or just a crystal ball. Any idea what the lottery numbers are this weekend darling ?



So how should the British media and politicians react to such dangerously racist rhetoric?

= What ours or yours ? If it yours you can use it to line the bottom of the budgie cage. Thats what I usually do with the Telegraph.



In the last few days this issue has become embroiled in the escalating row over giving the BNP a public platform on the BBC’s flagship political show Question Time. Whether we like it or not, the BNP are a legitimate political party with two representatives in the European parliament and the support of 6.2 per cent of the British electorate. As such, they are legitimately — though regrettably —entitled to a platform on mainstream media channels funded by the taxpayer. To refuse them would be to undermine our democratic principles and question our commitment to freedom of speech.

= Blimey Lucy speaks sense. Then again, for her to say ban the BNP would result in a ban for the Islamists she provides succour too, though of course they dont have an electoral mandate like we do. They simply get funds from Leeds council, the government 'anti-extremism Trade Union, Labour group, Black Only Projects' fund.


Moreover, by simply dismissing them outright, we fail to confront and undermine their ideas which are dangerous and divisive.

= What like telling the truth in this liberal fascist society where fear of being called a 'racist' means free speech has been replaced with self censorship.



I recently authored a paper entitled In Defence of British Muslims: A response to BNP racist propaganda in which I established that Nick Griffin and his party’s demonisation of British Muslims is based on factual inaccuracies and an ignorance of history.

= Also can be used as a cure for insomnia or as a sop to Islamists.



As such, their accusations are not difficult to refute. Beyond issues surrounding British Muslims, other hate-filled aspects of their ideology also need to be questioned and exposed.


= yawn.



British politicians, rather than shying away, need to arm themselves intellectually against the BNP and publicly challenge their ideology. If our politicians really believe that Griffin is wrong, they should have the courage to publicly challenge his views.

= oh yeah like thats gonna happen. The idiots in the political parties keep us out of public debates as they know they are too stupid to debate with us.


This is an approach that my own organisation, Quilliam, has been using to challenge Islamism over the past year – the ideology that would have contributed towards the creation of the violent mindset of the airline bombers.


= Er no. Your organisation is an Islamist front based on an incremental approach to the take over of the West as opposed to a military / terrorist take over.



Whilst Islamism and far-right extremism are ideologies that are significantly different, their use of sweeping generalizations and willful misrepresentations to conjure ‘us versus them’ mentalities means that the systematic deconstruction of their arguments is necessary to challenge them both.

= So the idea that Western Civilisation re Huntingdon and The Clash of Civilisation is false and Lucy James - non-entity token - is correct. Now who should we believe hmmmm.




It is the eighth anniversary of 9/11 on Friday. Unfortunately, we are facing a potential race-riot in Harrow as we did in Birmingham last weekend.

= Islam a race again !




We cannot allow extremism to breed extremism.

= deal with the Islamists then. The pussy moderates and liberals wont - they are surrender monkeys cringing before 'racism' and political correctness.



British politicians need to lead the way by challenging extremism through ideas, not through no-platform policies, nor through allowing it to fall to the fists of protestors.

= Politicians dont have ideas to deal with Islamism as they are shackled by political correctness. Therefore only the BNP can deal with it as the liberal surrender monkeys lick the arsehole of the Dhimmi-bastards that are selling our nation and civilisation out to the Taqqiya specalists like those in the Quilliam Foundation.


Lucy James is a research fellow at the Quilliam Foundation, a counter-extremism think tank.

= And a nice girl paid lots of money to peddle Dhimmi-bollocks to the masses and white liberal self loathing surrender monkeys.










Add to Technorati Favorites

Friday, 21 August 2009

Lucy James Loses The Argument

Here is what Lucy James says about Islam and immigration in her thesis ;


" 2.2 A religion of immigration

“People who emigrate in order to spread the cause of Islam and Allah
are particularly blessed. This religion has, right at its heart, a divinely
ordained push to emigrate to other people’s countries in order to
convert them to Islam”.51

“It’s a religion at one level. It’s a very efficient imperialistic machine for
taking over other people’s countries and territories on the other. So it
just does what it always has done... A conscious and deliberate plan...”52

‘the Crescent Horde – the endless wave of Islamics who are flocking to
our shores to bring our island nation into the embrace of their barbaric
desert religion’. 53


According to the BNP, the looming ‘Islamification of Europe’ owes a great deal
to the inherent nature of Islam as a religion— one that encourages emigration
with the intention of mass conversion. Griffin bases this argument on the
migrations of the Prophet referred to by Muslims as hijrah (‘migration’).
(Griffin, as far as can be found, is unaware of the term itself despite adopting
the argument.) In the Qur’an it is mentioned in the form of haajaru meaning
‘those who immigrated’ in nine separate verses. In all nine verses immigration
is mentioned in the context of struggling to maintain your faith and fleeing
from harm that might be inflicted upon you because of your beliefs. Therefore,
the Islamic concept of hijrah, derived from the Qur’an, has no connection with
any form of systematic conversion. "

Yet this is what other people think on this topic and their 'facts' are vastly different to the young and so sure Lucy, so who do we believe - do we believe young lucy working as a researcher for the government sponsored front group The Quilliam Foundation ;


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quilliam_Foundation


Funding

The Foundation has come under fire for its spending and funding. It allegedly spends "about £110,000 a year to rent offices at one of Central London’s most prestigious addresses", which, are "expensively furnished with state-of-the-art computers and plasma screen televisions". When it was disclosed the government had given it 1 Million pounds, "members of the Government and the Opposition" questioned the wisdom of "relying too heavily on a relatively unknown organisation ... to counter extremism." [38]


Abdullah Quilliam

Many of Abdullah Quilliam’s activities in nineteenth century Britain were remarkably similar to those currently undertaken by the Muslim activists in the West, particularly Hizb ut-Tahrir in Britain.[84]

“So the Foundation is named after a man who was an enemy of Britain - and the West - and whose sole loyalty was to Islam and to promoting the interests of Muslims. We have been warned. Hizb ut Tahrir at least have the merit of openness.” (WHYS)[85]


The Quilliam Foundation is a nest of Fabian Islamists - those 'reformed' ex-supporters of Islamist violence who see that in order to conquer the West it must be by stealth rather than war.


They are Islamist Gramscians surrounded by useful idiot liberals like Lucy James.

So do we believe the Islamist Fabians or the authors below ?


http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/the_hijra.html


Modern Day Trojan Horse: The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration

By Sam Solomon and Elias Al Maqdisi

ANM Publishers, 2009


139 pp., $14.95


Within the past few decades, mosques have increasingly dotted the landscapes of American and European cities and towns, with mega mosques often overshadowing adjacent, centuries-old churches in predominantly Christian regions. Islamic schools or academies and a host of Muslim organizations have become omnipresent across the West.


Meanwhile, Americans and Europeans have made countless accommodations to Muslim demands. They have included footbaths; high-decibel, five-times-daily calls to prayer; segregated male-female gym and swimming pool hours; halal food; workplace dispensations for handling pork products and for female head and face coverings; and special, public prayer rooms. Also, shari'ah-compliant financial transactions, the expunging of offensive likenesses of Mohammed or imagined depictions of Arabic characters that connote "Allah," official swearings-in on Korans in place of customary Bibles, the neutralizing of official descriptive language about Islamists and the jihad, the revision of so-called offensive content in movies and television programs, the removal of representations of pigs from the public sphere, and many other acculturations to Muslim entreaties have all been made in the service of respecting Muslim religious beliefs and practices.


To those in Western democracies, these accommodating actions appear, on the surface, to be little more than harmless civil gestures, respecting the needs of a growing religion in their midst and welcoming a new addition to their proud, multicultural tradition. Many Westerners pat themselves on the back for their liberal bent, their tolerance and their open-mindedness.


Little do they realize that this strategic pattern of demands is part of an insidious, 1,400-year-old proscription for Muslims that originates in the Koran and the Sunnah, the deeds of Mohammed. It is the Hijra or doctrine of immigration. Modeled by Mohammed's migration from Mecca to Medina, this immigration is not to a romanticized melting pot wherein newcomers gratefully search for opportunities for a better life in liberty and freely offer their talents and loyalty to benefit their new homeland. This is immigration for Islamic expansionism employing ethnic separatism to gain special status and privileges within the host country. Hijra is immigration designed to subvert and subdue non-Muslim societies and pave the way for eventual, total Islamization.


In their compelling book, "Modern Day Trojan Horse: The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration," authors Sam Solomon, a former professor of shari'ah law and convert to Christianity, and Elias Al Maqdisi, an expert on Islamic teachings, explain the migration of Muslims to the Dar-al-Harb, the "land of war," as a religious edict with a basis in Islamic doctrine. They delineate the step-by-step process of this 1,400-year-old strategy of conquest. It is a transitional strategy which they characterize as the most important step in spreading Islam and preparing for jihad. From their carefully delineated treatise on Hijra, it is clear that migration in concert with military conquest comprise the bookends of Islamic expansionism.


Solomon and Al Maqdisi review the phases of the Hijra and its juristic or legal basis in Islamic doctrine. Under the cover of taquiya or deception, the step-by-step methodology of the migration process is designed to subdue, then, subjugate the host culture, culminating in implementation of shari'ah law.


The beginning phase of Islamization usually includes activities pivotal to building a physical presence. It consists of public calls to prayer; founding of schools, libraries and research centers; and the teaching of Arabic -- actions that appear to be reasonable and respectable infrastructure requirements necessary to support the presence of a faith. At this point in the Hijra, it is permissible for Muslims to engage in haram, or forbidden actions, out of necessity to establish and empower the umma or Muslim community. Koranic rules such as the prohibition against friendships with infidels are suspended while the objectives of future Islamization are systematically put into place. In its initial phase, the Hijra passes scrutiny by the West whose citizens erroneously view the migration as mainly economic -- a pilgrimage for a better life.


Solomon and Maqdisi examine the comprehensive strategy that begins with the establishment of the umma or Muslim community. The mosque becomes the locus of power, a strategic base and the center of all activities. They explain how in this embryonic phase, a top priority is the scouting for new arrivals to expand and empower the existing Muslim community. Muslim leaders offer solicitous assistance and helpful suggestions for schools, housing, mosque worship, halal markets and other services to ingratiate themselves with new arrivals and bring them into the local Muslim community. Agents of local mosques, ever alert for new immigrants and potential converts, engage in subtle forms of indoctrination and police local Muslims.


This first step of establishing the mosque as the center of local Islamic life and activities is mistakenly viewed by non-Muslims as merely the benign construction of houses of worship. Its true goal escapes notice, that of firmly establishing a purposeful non-integrated Muslim identity to advance the goal of Islamization.


Once the consolidation of the Muslim community occurs under the radar, the purposeful fight for special status and shari'ah follows. As dictated by the Koran and Sunnah, segregation from non-Muslims is a natural outcome of the advancement of the Hijra.


Visible changes begin to be apparent as the Muslim population achieves more of a critical mass. Over time, the dress code, often beginning with a hijab in segregated enclaves and moving toward the complete covering of a neqab in the public sphere, separates Muslim women from men and from non-Muslim women. Eventually, as the host population becomes familiarized with what they believe to be the requirements of religious piety, demands are made for segregation at public facilities, in the workplace and at schools and universities. Requests for halal food, shari'ah-compliant financial transactions and the addition of Muslim holidays to public calendars further elevate the Muslim community with a special status making them separate and distinct.


All demands are initially presented as benign attempts to accommodate the religious requirements of devout Muslims. Any actions to suppress them are decried as religious discrimination. In the United States, requests for separate swimming and gym hours for Muslim men and women, demands for identification photos for licenses for women wearing hijabs and refusals to handle pork products or don immodest dress in the workplace have appeared. At this point, representatives of the Muslim community are often working cooperatively with the host government to bring about change. As Solomon and Maqdisi explain, the idea is to get the host society accustomed to Muslim buildings, customs, holidays, dress and food. Newcomers are encouraged by Muslim leadership to become citizens, vote and run for political office to increase the umma's influence.


At the university level, students are indoctrinated to become advocates for Islam, engage in interfaith activities and da'wa or proselytization and train for jihad. Non-Muslims professors are solicited through zakat or payments to present courses favorable to Islam and write and speak publicly to promote Islam. The bequeathal by Saudi Prince Al-waleed bin Talal of $20 million dollars for Islamic study centers at Harvard and Georgetown universities, respectively, was a gesture to insure the promulgation of positive research, publications and presentations toward Islam.


In "Modern Day Trojan Horse," Solomon and Maqdisi point out that as Muslims gain power and mass in the host country, consolidation of identity occurs, as well as strengthening of their infrastructure of mosques, schools, clubs, organizations and media. The doctrine of taquiya is firmly in place as Muslims hide behind the dictates of their religious devotion and seek cultural changes in the land of the non-Muslim or kuffar. At this more advanced stage, attempts are made to silence opponents and curry favor. The judicious use of zakat elicits favorable views of Muslims and Islam from politicians, representatives from the media and other organizations. For example, within the last couple of years in the United States, the words, "jihad" and "Islamofascism," have been expunged from the lexicon of government officials and the words, "Islamic" and "terrorism," are rarely paired. In Europe, which is further advanced in this process, a dangerous turn materialized with the murder of filmmaker ,Theo Van Gogh, who produced a film on the subjugation of women in Islam, and with death threats against Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilder for his outspoken criticism of Islam.


As Islamization of the host culture proceeds apace, preparations begin for learning the skills necessary for jihad. Young jihadists may travel to their countries of origin for further indoctrination and terrorist training. This development has been noted within Somali Muslim communities in Minnesota and Tennessee. Young Muslims have disappeared to Somalia to rendezvous with Al Shabaab, a terrorist group linked to Al Qaeda.


As the resident Muslim community becomes more established and begins to wield considerable power in the political arena, pressure is brought to bear on politicians to permit shari'ah law courts in exchange for Muslim votes. This is very much evident in Britain where parallel systems of legal jurisprudence currently coexist. Muslim inhabitants of the host country are pressured to follow shari'ah law in lieu of the prevailing legal system. Several recent legal decisions by non-Muslim judges in Europe have referenced shari'ah law as a standard for verdicts concerning Muslims.


As the intensity of the hijra advances, the appearance of open ghettos or Muslim-only regions occurs. These are areas where non-Muslims are essentially prohibited and where, if they enter, they actually may be physically threatened. Such no-go zones, where even non-Muslim community workers are unwelcome, exist throughout Europe today. Remarkably, Muslim movements are never restricted; they venture freely anywhere in the host country.


As Solomon and Maqdisi point out, the Hijra is a comprehensive and direct political attempt to undermine the culture and values of the host country and replace them with Islam and shari'ah. It is an insidious migration seeking transformation of the culture, behaviors, customs, rules and laws of a host society to spread Islam and establish an Islamic state. The stages of the Hijra are very much evident in varying degrees in all Western societies today. Ironically, our open democratic societies with constitutionally mandated freedoms of speech, religion and assembly have facilitated this march toward the very demise of our way of life.


"Modern Day Trojan Horse" should be required reading for all citizens of Western democracies who urgently need to understand the Hijra and the threat it represents. The book sounds the alarm for the cautious evaluation of what may appear to be innocent religious practice in our midst but has sinister motives to transform our societies forever.





































Add to Technorati Favorites

Thursday, 20 August 2009

Lucy James Thesis on the BNP

I have just read Lucy James thesis on the BNP.

Basically it can be boiled down to the two following statements ;

1) Anything to do with Islam and Muslims = the source of all learning and goodness in the universe

2) BNP and Nick Griffin = The Empire and Darth Vader

Its like a childs fairy tale with the BNP as the big bad wolf.

My favourite bit though was this unintentionally hilarious statement ;

" Moreover, Muslims have been a part of the original fabric of Europe for many centuries. In Eastern Europe, particularly, places like Bosnia-Herzegovina,
Kosovo and Albania have seen significant Muslim communities living there
since the Ottoman expansion into the Balkans in the fourteenth century ".



Thanks for clarifying that point Lucy.

Seeing as you were born in about 1990, you probably dont remember the Balkan Wars do you dearie.

The problem is that in Kosovo, Albania and other Muslim enclaves today in the Balkans there are virtually no longer any NON-Muslims living there, and the few that do are living in fear from terrorists and criminals.













Add to Technorati Favorites

Lucy James, The BNP and THE BELIEVERS !





In the West, the most ignorant in any society are usually the most well educated.

This is because wisdom is like a pearl, in that it is formed over a lifetime.

It cannot be found, bestowed or produced in books.

It is produced only by direct experience of life.

Students are taught to think only in black and white, like the lines on the pages of the books they read where they derive their learning.

The problem with students is that they regard 'learning' and wisdom as the same things, when they are not.

A learned student that has just been excreted from a modern university with a new degree is not a wise person, for a learned student has simply learnt what the Establishment in power at any given time wants them to learn.

The proper aim of an educational system is to create fully realised, free thinking individuals whose innate talents have been awoken and trained to their very pinnacle of perfection.

Thereby the whole country and then the world benefits from the wise ones that we have invested so much money, time and enormous monetary, environmental and physcial resources upon.

The fact that most students leave university with closed minds and their values and beliefs warped by arrogant misconceptions and poisoned by asinine hypocrisy is primary evidence that the true aim of the modern education system is not to educate students into becoming fully realised, free thinking individuals but to produce politically correct bigots filled to the brim with bullshit and opinions, but little wisdom and even less intelligence.


We can prove this when we read articles such as the one here in The Guardian by ;

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/aug/20/bnp-far-right-racist-argument


Lucy seems like a sweet child.

Her face is even still shining with the waxy vernix of her infancy and she even resembles a precious little china doll.

Yet Lucy, in the hubris of her learned ignorance, believes she can diagnose a disease, then offer a cure, not without any direct contac or experience with the contagion or any research into why the contagion is spreading, but simply by reading of the contagion in books written by others who also have never had direct experience of the contagion or researched why it spreading.

The fact is that sitting in a university and reading books is not going to make you a wise, intelligent or useful person - in most cases university simply turns you into a tool - of the establishment, the existing class, political and economic institutions and interests and transforms you an enemy of all true free thinkers.

You see Lucy what you dont realise is that there is not ONE BNP.

You and your ilk see a monstrous monolith of ideology, when the reality is that the BNP is simply an organisation where free thinkers with dissident opinions gather to exchange ideas.

Take your article on Islam.

You argue that the way to take on the BNP is to challenge it on the facts.

First of all your use of 'facts' to rebut some of our propaganda are not in reality 'facts' at all.

The only true 'facts' are based on fundamental scientific principles and realities that remain eternal and unchanging in relation to the status of an individual object. Eg the orbit of the earth around sun and the composition of an atom of iron.


Your facts are simply products of the existing power, class, political and economic system - in that they are commissioned, sanctioned and disseminated by the system for its own benefit. Take for research into race. Up until a few years ago there were no research programmes in racial difference, and therefore scant 'facts' were available as to the reality of racial differences. Because of this failure to research the reality of racial differences the scientists and politicans could announce 'racial differences do not exist as we have no evidence to prove they exist' - and of course this was correct as they had NEVER looked for any racial differences and they had never funded any research into racial differences. Therefore no 'facts' existed to prove racial differences actually existed.

But with the advent of the era of pharmacogenomics, then the profit motive has caused the corporations, universities and research bodies to begin to investigate the science of racial differences. This is why we now see many papers being released on a regular basis that reinforce the 'factual evidence' of racial differences.

It is not until one section of the establishment has the power to initiate and authorise the evidence of a 'fact' that a fact becomes established as a fact.

Therefore the 'facts' you rely upon are merely projections of the present power structure, and therefore as the present power structure has an interest in undermining the BNP then it only allows anti-BNP 'facts' to be written, published and disseminated to students and the public via academic publications and newspapers - even though those 'facts' are not facts but are based solely on new lies built upon old lies - and these 'facts' that are then published into wider society or that end up in books in university libraries and on 'essential reading lists' for students.

Therefore each new crop of students simply adds another turgid turd of a dissertation or 'idea' based on the bullshit they have learnt on top of the already festering dung heap of ignorance built up by previous generations of learned idiots.

A new turd on top of the dungheap is not a 'fact'.

This is because in their arrogance and stupidity university students are foolish enough to believe that universities are institutions that are designed to produce wise individuals, instead of learned slaves.

The present Establishment does not allow democracy, free speech, free debate and the free flow of ideas in our society. Therefore your 'facts' are simply products of a flawed system and thereby can only produce flawed facts.

Your facts are products of propaganda, and therefore your 'cure' for the contagion will not work.

In reality, as opposed to the propaganda, the BNP is a hive of ideas.

The problem with the BNP is not that we dont have any good ideas, but that we have too many.

Take Lucy's research and report on Islam.

She believes she knows what the BNP as a collective entity thinks about Islam simply by secondary means eg via what has been written in party propaganda or what has been in published in the hostile media.

The idea that the propaganda of a collective entity represents the totality of opinion on an issue, is simply foolish.

Propaganda as a process is governed by many factors - such as the law, the medium of propaganda, the nature of the information to be transmitted, the culture of the recipients, the nature of the people and society and other issues.

Therefore propaganda does not reflect the totality of opinion in an organisation, but merely the process whereby certain opinions may be disseminated to the wider public at any given time.

As the nature of society evolves and the laws in that society are changed by those in power and become ever more rigid and shut down free public debate on an issue in order to protect the interests of the establishment in power, then in order to avoid arrest and prosecution propaganda is changed to ensure it remains within the terms of the new law.

Therefore propaganda changes to reflect social realities.

The present law is merely an instrument of control by those who are presently in power. The law does not uphold democracy, liberty or our rights, as only we can do that for ourselves.

The aim of the law in Britain today is simply to ensure the interests of the existing elite are protected.

The law, and those in power, are often the enemies of the people, and at such times revolutions are born.

The moment that any elite is so out of touch with the opinions, lives and experiences of ordinary people, and the scions of the elite obsessed with ideas rather than realities, then chaos is about to begin.

Lucy and her kind are victims of false consciousness, for they have been conditoned by the educational system and the media with opinions that bear no basis in relation to the reality experienced by millions and millions of people in this country.

Lucy is a prisoner in the illusions of her ignorance.

The two stories below reveal the reality of our country, and yet for Lucy this reality is to be ignored, hidden and minimised by focusing her attention on the propaganda that the BNP produce about Islam ;

http://www.bucksfreepress.co.uk/news/localnews/wycombenews/4552126.Police_action_targets_teen_muggers/

A POLICE operation targeting robbery hotspots has slashed muggings of young people by 100 per cent, officers said.

Patrols including stop and search on the Rye, Desborough Road, Eden and a skate park saw robberies fall to zero from 177 last year, they said.

This was among 12 to 19-year-olds. Operation Gauntlet will run to the end of the school holidays.

Police chose to launch the six-week operation after attacks by mostly Asian and afro-Caribbean gangs on white teenagers last summer, police said.

DC Paul Bowen said: “Officers would still stop large groups regardless of ethnicity but they would have at the back of their mind that the robberies are committed by this group of ethnic minorities.”

About 80 per cent of last year’s robberies were committed by gangs of Asian and afro-Caribbean people, he said.

Of last year’s attacks, 44 included the showing or threat of a knife.



http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/4555469.Teenager_gets_five_years_for_race_stabbing/


Manningham man shouted racial abuse before attack
9:03am Thursday 20th August 2009

By Steve Wright »


A teenager who stabbed and slashed a passer-by in a racially motivated attack has been locked up for five years.

Amir Rehman, 18, shouted racial abuse as 51-year-old Ronald O’Connor walked to a shop for a loaf of bread, near the gates of Lister Park, Manning-ham, last December.

Leeds Crown Court was told Rehman shouted out: “Manningham belongs to Muslims. We don’t want whites. We rule Bradford. We are going to get you out.”

His frightened victim, Ronald O’Connor, tried to get in the shop, but Rehman ran up and stabbed him twice in the upper arm with a four to five-inch bladed knife.



Lucy my dear, people dont vote BNP because of our propaganda on Islam.

They vote for us because they live in real fucking world.

Unlike you and your pitiful cabal of onanists, real people have real experience of the real world and this makes them wise.

They know the society they live in, the see how it is changing, they know the government lies to them and they know what sort of country their kids will have to live in unless this process of treason and betrayal by the politicians of all the mainstream parties is not stopped.

This is why so many socialists, leftists and liberals and other over educated, over priveliged, smug middle class idiots, mockneys and white flighting class traitors living in Dorset are appointed by the media to articulate the voice and interests of the working class - people like Billy Bragg, Miss Dynamite, Damon Albarn etc.

They do not represent the working class. They represent only themselves.

They have never experienced real life in a white working class estate as they exist in a cocoon of wealth, power and privelige that has managed to isolate from the real world.

Nor can white middle class university educated idiots ever represent the interests of the white working class.

Even white working class kids who do go to university are filled with the leftist and liberal bullshit they are exposed too and then become a BELIEVER !

A BELIEVER is someone who has little experience of the real world, but who believes what they have been told about the real world by other people who have never really experienced the real world either - people like teachers, academics and those slaves of the system who are able to get jobs in the system, get book deals in the system, that get funding to do reasearch and print publications by the system and those who are paid to produce the books, ideas and opinions the systems want promoted in wider society.

Those who really KNOW the world we live in, are always the most excluded from any public discourse.

Once upon a time in America only middle class leftist Whites and Jews were allowed to lead the civil rights movement in America for black civil rights, then the Blacks were allowed to organise themselves and promoted their own community interests.

Today we have black and asian academics, middle class whites straight out of university, radical lesbians and activist homosexuals 'articulating' and assuming the power and authority to express the opinions, ideas and experiences of the white working class.

These self appointed spokesmen and women then issue reports, PDF's, articles in The Guardian and give speeches in the house of Parliament about what the white working class experience, think and feel - when in reality all they are doing is regurgitating the bullshit they have been told and the lies the system pays them to produce and promote.

Give me a fucking break.

The idea that any Parliamentarian, Asian, Muslim, Black, Lesbian or Homosexual or Upper Middle Class White person can understand, articulate and represent the interests of the White Working Class is patrionising nonsense.

The last thing these people ever do is actually go and talk to the white working class or the the BNP.

Instead they print their reports, their articles and their research papers and merely pepetuate the ignorance of themselves and their peers.

In every paper we read how some government minister wants the government to talk to the Taliban, Al Qaeda, the IRA, radical muslim youth etc etc - but no-one ever says 'lets talk to the white working class who we have demonised and abused as racists for decades and find out what they really think, and lets talk to the BNP and find out why it is that people are really voting for the BNP'.

Instead we get the white working class demonised by smug, middle class arseholes in The Guardian as 'racists' for defending their interests as a community, culture, religion and as a race in our multi-cultural society where every other community, culture, religion and race is expected, funded and subsidised by local councils and governments to protect their own interests.

Nobody talks to the BNP even though we are the elected representatives and voice of white working class communities.

Why is the police talk to unelected members of the ethnic minority communities in places like London and Leicester where whites are a minority, but the police do not ever speak to the minority white community in those areas and ascertain what their interests are ?

The two articles above are merely a drop in an ocean.

When you get the brain and the balls to realise you have been talking bollocks all this time, then come talk to us.

We will tell you all about the real world little girl.

You will not like what we tell you though and you certainly wont get any research money to fund your report or get it published.

There really are monsters in the real world Lucy, not just the bogeyman of the BNP that you have been conditoned to believe is the problem.





























Add to Technorati Favorites