Showing posts with label corporatocracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corporatocracy. Show all posts

Friday, 5 June 2009

The Higher Path





There is only ever one winner in modern elections and that is the Corporate Media.

An election is merely an electronic propaganda war between different parts of the Corporatocracy's media propaganda wings.

In consumer societies the majority of the voting masses are mainly mere media conditioned drones who are pre-programmed by the corporate media propaganda to vote how and for whom the media tells them.

The majority do not vote as they are alienated from the process itself. They are our people, the Silent Majority, and they must be re-engaged with politics.

That must be our mission.

The entire spectrum of mainstream politics is a controlled paradigm, the left wing media such as The Guardian propagandise the Labour Party, the right wing media such as the Telegraph and Sun propagandise the Tory Party and the liberals have the Independent to propagandise the Lib Dems whilst each of them condemn the BNP.

Strategically useful parties like UKIP whose social and political influence is marginalised into impotency by their presence solely being inside the EU parliament (where they are similarly marginalised into impotency by being within the EU parliamentary system itself) are propagandised by the media at the required time in order to divert any potential protest vote in Britain that could generate a real mainstream nationalist party and movement that could challenge the power of the Corporate Media and their political puppets.

In return for their seats in Parliament these political whores work for the interests of the Corporatocracy that own media.

The UKIP fakes are able to gorge on the cash in the pig trough of the European Parliament, whilst the British parliamentary fakes are able to gorge in the expenses of the Houses of Troughminster.

Each of these fat little piglets suckles on the teat of their own bloated sow, be that the British parliament or the European parliament.

The word parliament today is synonymous with corruption.

Parliaments are merely the pigstys of the Corporatocracy.

They are not where places the interests of the People are protected, it is the place where the people are betrayed.

Everywhere the Corporate Media rule, they elect those who sit in the European Parliament, they elect those who sit in Parliament and they elect those who are elected in local elections. The media control the entire political process via the manipulation of public opinion at the national and local level.

Local candidates are attacked by the 'local' papers in their areas which proudly host on their front pages some icon of local heritage and history as their corporate logo, yet its owners are Corporate Media groups whose owners may be as much in Dubai, as in America, the UK or Tel Aviv.

Most local papers are about as local as coca-cola, but the people believe that these newspapers and TV news presenters actually represent THEIR interests as opposed to the interests of the Corporate Media groups that own them.

People still trust the media.

They still believe what the media tells them.

They still believe the media is impartial, objective and fair.

They still think the media represents them and their interests.

They still think the medai reflect rather than create public opinion and sentiment.

They still think the media is telling them what they think rather than what to think.

Their slavery is made all the more insidious as it is mental rather than physical.

At any moment the merest reflex from the people would shake us free from this tyranny of traitors, but they are so chained that they no longer know that they are not free.

Freedom has become for them a mere expression of consumer choices. The more consumer commodities there were for them to buy, the more free they saw themselves.

Consumerism became our new opiate, sating us with its toys and trinkets whilst the media, the politicians and the Servile State stole away our liberty and democracy.

The media tells people what to wear, what to eat, where to go on holiday, who to sleep with, who trust and who to vote for. At all levels their wants and needs are defined for them.

The masses are enslaved yet do not even know it.

Now we live in a bankrupt, ghettoised, sectarianised, crime ridden and corrupt country under the tyranny of a Surveillance Society, the domination of Political Correctness and the control of the Corporate Media.

At all levels we have been betrayed.

When the Tipping Point comes as the Convergence of Catastrophies really begins to impact upon the planet, then the fall will be all the harder.


Sooner or later the world will dine upon its banquet of consequences.

Our nation has been eviscerated from within, inexoribly like determined termites the traitors have worn away the innards of our country. They have stolen away our rights, our laws, our liberty and our wealth, and left us destitute whilst they reside in luxury and profligacy.

Our primary enemy is now clear.

It is the Corporate Media - those who get the political parties elected into power.

We must teach our people to mistrust the media and at the same time create our own alternative Nationalist media at all levels. From films, music, books, social networking, festivals, musical tours, nights out, social events, banks, media, business networks etc etc.

We must replace the media with A NATIONALIST MEDIA.

The answer is therefore also clear, we must re-engage with the people at the level of the community at the same time as create our Nationalist Media and engage to attack the legitimacy of the Corporate Media itself.

Our community has been taught to reject thinking of itself in the terms of a community or as a people.

Whilst ethnic groups in the UK have been driven by the media to organise around the principle of their race, religion or nationality in our multi-cultural society in order to represent and protect their interests as a community - at the exact same time the indigenous White British people have been attacked, villified and their organisations attacked by the same corporate media when we seek to organise as a community in our society to protect our community and indivudual interests and rights.

This is why we have seen our culture, laws, liberty and heritage stolen from us as we have not organised those organisations in our society capable of defending our social interests - instead we relied on the traitor politicians who served solely the interests of the Corporate Media and themselves - and watched impassively as we have been totally betrayed.

Now we must organise ourselves.

Our community must first be organised into a community before it capable of thinking, and voting, like a community and before it is capable of defending our social, political, cultural and economic interests as a community.

A consciousness of our commonality, an awareness of themselves as a people and a community must be created in the consciousness of our people, before the National Community will be created.

The roots of the National Community are in all those white communities where our people have no organisations or groups that represent their commonality.

Once this consciousness of commonality exists and is seen to be organising, then the communities will grow. Our people need help and they need representing and that is what we must be doing.

Alongside politics we must begin to engage with our people on the basis of forming community groups, extended social networks and social networking, a business network, community building organisations and a programme of political re-engagement for our community.

The Corporate Media attack we who seek to organise our community as a community when we raise ourselves onto the radar of local and national politics. Therefore many more community organisations for our people must be set up that organise at a grassroots level so that the machinations of the Corporate Media be thwarted.

Until we form a National Community whose roots are in all our local communities, then we will never be free. Politics is the intermediary stage between the awakening of the people and the taking control of Parliament.

Therefore to be able to engage proprely in the political process we must have created a new National Community capable of overcoming the power of the Corporate Media.

That requires we build a majority vote on the ground in our communities before we step into the political arena. Only when we can win with our vote already built within our communities can we move into power. If we do not do this then the power of the media will always be able to check mate us.

Our efforts must be as much into community grassroots engagement and community building as it must be into politics.

We must build our majority on the ground before we can we create a majority in Parliament.

Regardless of the size of the vote in these elections the path forward is clear.































































Add to Technorati Favorites

Tuesday, 11 December 2007

The Beast Awakens




The twin Al Qaeda suicide bomb attacks on the city of Algiers in Algeria which have killed scores of people and devastated two UN buildings, comes at an opportune time for the US. The threat of Al Qaeda needed to be demonstrated to the world in order to divert attention away from what is happening in Washington, where the current and two previous CIA chiefs are implicated in a conspiracy to conceal evidence from a congressional investigation, gave perjured testimony under oath to that investigation and destroyed evidence so that Congress could not avail itself of it.

The Project Censored site http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2008/index.htm , which is a superb site, reveals that Bush has passed into law the following new laws ;

1) The John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007, which was quietly signed by Bush on October 17, 2006, the very same day that he signed the Military Commissions Act, allows the president to station military troops anywhere in the United States and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to “suppress public disorder.”

By revising the two-century-old Insurrection Act, the law in effect repeals the Posse Comitatus Act, which placed strict prohibitions on military involvement in domestic law enforcement.

2) " “Military Commissions Act of 2006” Public Law 109-366, 109th Congress.
See ;
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_public_laws&docid=f :publ366.109.

With the approval of Congress and no outcry from corporate media, the Military Commissions Act (MCA) signed by Bush on October 17, 2006, ushered in military commission law for US citizens and non-citizens alike.

Robert Parry points to text in the MCA that allows for the institution of a military alternative to the constitutional justice system for “any person” regardless of American citizenship. The MCA effectively does away with habeas corpus rights for “any person” arbitrarily deemed to be an “enemy of the state.” The judgment on who is deemed an “enemy combatant” is solely at the discretion of President Bush. "

3) A provision mysteriously tucked into the Military Commission Act (MCA) just before it passed through Congress and was signed by President Bush on October 17, 2006, (see number 1)redefines torture, removing the harshest, most controversial techniques from the definition of war crimes, and exempts the perpetrators—both interrogators and their bosses—from prosecution for such offences dating back to November 1997.

So Bush can just exempt them from the charges of torture, but they may have to face their charges for misleading Congress.

This is why the 'threat' of Al Qaeda needed to be used in order to consolidate their defence to the charges of misleading congress.

How better to demonstrate that threat, than for Al Qaeda then to go and blow up a few bombs somewhere in the world, specifically involving high profile targets like the UN to consolidate global outrage at the terrorists.


A) MOTIVE ;

With CIA Director Michael Hayden's explanation Tuesday of how videotapes of terror suspect interrogations were made, then destroyed, has left many questions unanswered, said Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller.

The West Virginia Democrat called his panel's 90-minute closed-door session with Hayden "a useful and not yet complete hearing" and vowed the committee would get to the bottom of the matter. Among lingering questions: who authorized destruction of the tapes, and why Congress wasn't told about it.

Hayden told reporters afterwards that because the tapes were made under one of his predecessors, and were destroyed under another, he wasn't able to completely answer all questions.

"The taping was done under Director Tenet. Destroyed under Director Goss--before my time. There are other people in the agency who know about his far better than I, and I committed them to come on down and answer all the questions the committee might have."

Hayden also said he laid out the facts as best he knew them before the panel, including why the CIA taped the interrogations and why the tapes were destroyed.

The hearing came as a former CIA agent who was part of the interrogation team went public with his account, saying the waterboarding of a top al-Qaida figure was approved at the top levels of the U.S. government.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22197814/



B) MEANS ;

Algerian Al Qaeda linked group, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/11/AR2007041100371.html

al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb ;

http://www.cfr.org/publication/12717/

Reports from North Africa point to a recent resurgence in terrorist activity by several local Islamist movements, the most prominent of which is the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC). An Algeria-based Sunni group that recently renamed itself al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the organization has taken responsibility for a number of terrorist attacks in the region, declared its intention to attack Western targets, and sent a squad of jihadis to Iraq.

http://www.drudge.com/news/101694/bombs-kill-60-algiers

Led by Abdelmalek Droukdel ;

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3635470.stm


Just 8 days ago the US and the CIA designated the Al Qaeda group led by Droukdel a listed organisation ;

http://www.coniglios.com/

December 4, 2007

Washington, DC--The U.S. Department of the Treasury today designated Abdelmalek Droukdel (Droukdel), the leader or emir of Al Qaida in the Lands of the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). AQIM, a violent extremist group based in Algeria, merged with al Qaida in September 2006.

"As emir of AQIM, Droukdel has supervised and ordered deadly terrorist attacks against innocents," said Adam J. Szubin, Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). "We will continue efforts to dismantle AQIM's financial infrastructure and financially isolate its members."

As a result of the merger with Al Qaida, AQIM, formerly known as the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC), changed its name to AQIM. Droukdel assumed leadership of AQIM in mid-2004.


Looks like the muzzle came off and the beast it was let off its leash just over a week ago, and it has now begun its murderous rampage.





Other Al Qaeda / CIA joint Terrorism ;

The CIA have even been involved directly in bombing operations, the Michael Meiring Phillipines bombing case of May 16 th 2002 is proof of high level US involvement in Islamist terrorism abroad with groups linked to AL Qaeda.

" The Meiring episode is the best substantiated of several wild reports this
year that have Filipinos convinced there's a "stealth invasion" of their
country underway. Consistent themes include the involvement of Meiring's
favorite Muslim rebel armies -- the MNLF, MILF and Abu Sayyaf - and the
invasion of Sabah, Malaysia.

On February 21, 2002 Rosanna Halong, wife of notorious Abu Sayyaf leader Abu
Sabaya, phoned Radyo Agong dxMD in Koronodel City and announced that her
husband was in on a CIA plot to break Sabah away from Malaysia and fuse it
with Mindanao to form an independent country - a plot long popular with
CIA-linked treasure hunters like Gould and North. "


http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=25636

Abu Sayyaf (the phrase means “bearer of the sword” in Arabic) is a militant organization based in the southern Philippines seeking a separate Islamic state for the country's Muslim minority. The White House says Abu Sayyaf is a terrorist organization with ties to Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network, and most recently to Indonesian fugitives responsible for other civilian attacks in neighboring the neighboring country.

http://www.cfr.org/publication/9235/


The Abu Sayyaf organisation itself was created, funded and trained by the CIA in the Phillipines ;

http://www.socialistworker.org/2002-1/388/388_04_Philipinnes.shtml

According to various sources, Abu Sayyaf, the Islamic fundamentalist organization notorious for kidnapping tourists in southern Philippines and Malaysia, was formed and trained by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency and the Philippine military.

Philippine Senator Aquilino Pimentel called for an inquiry into the link between the CIA and Abu Sayyaf--which he called a "CIA monster"--as early as May of last year. "There are now emerging bits of information that Abu Sayyaf was indeed the creation of probably the CIA in connivance with or with the support of some select military officers," he said at the time.

Monday, 5 November 2007

The Masses and their Massers

For those 'stupids' out there that think we live in a democracy heres a primer as regards the facts for you ;

We do not live in a Democracy - we live in a Corporatocracy under the Rule of the Tyranny of the Minorities ( the media, judges, corporations, ethnic pressure groups and immigrant lobby groups both socialist left and capitalist right )

A democracy is based on the will of the MAJORITY of the PEOPLE freely excercised.

We live in a country where the interests of minorities take precedence over the rights of the Majority.

Democracy comes from Demos Kratos - the Greek for People Power.

Note how power comes from the PEOPLE.

In Britain, and all modern civilisations, power does not come from the people.

There are in fact three 'Power Structures ' in our society ABOVE that of the people.

The first of these, and the most powerful and dangerous, is the MEDIA.

The MEDIA use their power to condition peoples minds and to get them to vote for the political parties they support. The media propagandise the political parties they wnt elected and then those political parties once in power do what the corporations that own the media want them to do.

The political parties, and the whore politicians, serve the corporations that own the media not the PEOPLE.

The media use what is defined as 'Paradigm Control' to ensure that public opinion, and the bounds of what is regarded as politically and socially acceptable in society, is defined by solely by the Media.

Those political parties that the media do not own and control are labelled as 'extremists' by the media so the masses, with sheep like docility, will not vote for them - and instead will continue to vote for the whore parties and whore politicians owned and controlled by the corporations that control the media.

This technique of ' Social Control By The Media ' has been used since the early days of the Milner Group - http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/quigley.html

This influence was not exercised by acting directly on public opinion, since the Milner Group never intended to influence events by acting through any instruments of mass propaganda, but rather hoped to work on the opinions of the small group of "important people," who in turn could influence wider and wider circles of persons. This was the basis on which the Milner Group itself was constructed; it was the theory behind the Rhodes Scholarships; it was the theory behind "The Round Table and the Royal Institute of International Affairs; it was the theory behind the efforts to control All Souls, New College, and Balliol and, through these three, to control Oxford University; and it was the theory behind The Times. No effort was made to win a large circulation for The Times, for, in order to obtain such a circulation, it would have been necessary to make changes in the tone of the paper that would have reduced its influence with the elite, to which it had been so long directed. The theory of "the elite" was accepted by the Milner Group and by The Times, as it was by Rhodes.

{p. 114} The Times was to be a paper for the people who are influential, and not for the masses. The Times was influential, but the degree of its influence would never be realized by anyone who examined only the paper itself. The greater part of its influence arose from its position as one of several branches of a single group, the Milner Group. By the interaction of these various branches on one another, under the pretense that each branch was an autonomous power, the influence of each branch was increased through a process of mutual reinforcement. The unanimity among the various branches was believed by the outside world to be the result of the influence of a single Truth, while really it was the result of the existence of a single group. Thus, a statesman (a member of the Group) announces a policy. About the same time, the Royal Institute of International Affairs publishes a study on the subject, and an Oxford don, a Fellow of All Souls (and a member of the Group) also publishes a volume on the subject (probably through a publishing house, like G. Bell and Sons or Faber and Faber, allied to the Group). The statesman's policy is subjected to critical analysis and final approval in a "leader" in The Times, while the two books are reviewed (in a single review) in The Times Literary Supplement. Both the "leader" and the review are anonymous but are written by members of the Group.

And finally, at about the same time, an anonymous article in The Round Table strongly advocates the same policy. The cumulative effect of such tactics as this, even if each tactical move influences only a small number of important people, is bound to be great. If necessary, the strategy can be carried further, by arranging for the secretary to the Rhodes Trustees to go to America for a series of "informal discussions" with former Rhodes Scholars, while a prominent retired statesman (possibly a former Viceroy of India) is persuaded to say a few words at the unveiling of a plaque in All Souls or New College in honor of some deceased Warden. By a curious coincidence, both the "informal discussions" in America and the unveiling speech at Oxford touch on the same topical subject.

{in a "democracy", such "agenda-setting" by an elite is a process of "seeding" public opinion.}

The next layer of power in our so called 'democracy' are the Judges.

The Judges are able to strike down any laws passed by the politicians. Judges are not voted into power and are not accountable to the people. The Judges in our country are infected with Leftist and Liberal activists following the Gramscian infiltrationist methodology who are using the law ( The ECHR, EU law etc ) to strike down laws which are designed to benefit the British people. These judges serve the interests of the corporations, the left and the immigrant / ethnic lobby groups. The Judges are the enforcement mechanism of the Tyranny of the Minorities. They take the laws passed by the whore politicians, then distort them and change them so they fit the interests of their particular masters.

Most Judges do not serve the interests of Justice or the British people, they serve the interests of the 'shadow government' - that is the corporations, the left, the ethnics and the immigrants.

The next layer are the whore politicians - they serve the interests of the media and the corporations that own / advertise in the media. Without the support of the media the whore politicians do not get elected.

The final - and weakest layer of power in our democracy - are the PEOPLE.

The people are lied too by the media, lied too by the politicians, used by the Judges and finally expected to trot along to the ballot box like conditioned slaves and vote for their 'massers'.

This the masses do like the conditioned slaves they are.

This then brings us to todays article in the Telegraph.

General Musharraf understands how the power structures in Pakistan operate.

The Imams control the Islamists. The Judges serve their particular masters either Liberals or Islamists. The lawyers work for either the Islamists or the Liberals. The media either support the Islamists or the Liberals.

Not one of these sections of society cares about the Pakistani nation or state. They each serve ONLY their own particular sectarian interests.

Therefore Musharraf has acted to shut down these power structures and ensure the survival of the Pakistani nation and state from those Islamists and Liberals that threaten to destroy it.

The Telegraph , with outstanding hypocritical arrogance , has today attacked Musharraf for his 'anti-democratic coup' - coming from a newspaper that is one of the primary agents of the Corporatocracy, the Tyranny of the Minorities and the British Shadow Government, this is laughable.

Musharrafs crime is that he has dismantled the anti-democratic mechanisms in Pakistani society that are destroying the Pakistani nation and State. That includes the shutting down of the media - the primary enemy of democracy in every society.

This is what the Telegraph says ;

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/11/05/wpak405.xml

" General Musharraf's primary aim was to cleanse the Supreme Court bench. That he has achieved — all its judges have been forced to resign and several, including the Chief Justice, Iftikhar Chaudhry, are under arrest. The Supreme Court had become a major irritant for military rule, and was due to rule on a petition whether Gen Musharraf could remain president for another five years. "

This is because Musharraf understands that the Judges in Pakistan, as in Britain, are mechanisms for the Islamists and Liberals to use to destroy the Pakistani nation and state. Therefore he has dealt with them the way he should deal with all terrorists.

The Taliban terrorist may plant the bombs, but the Judges free the terrorists to commit the crimes and strike down the laws, such as they do in the UK, that are designed to prevent the terrorists from operating.

" Thus the emergency's first target is not the extremists terrorising northern Pakistan, but the democratic, secular elite. Dozens of judges, lawyers and human rights workers have been arrested while more have gone underground to avoid arrest. Journalists and the media are being targeted and harassed in an unprecedented manner.

Asma Jehangir, Pakistan's leading human rights activist, who is now under house arrest, appealed yesterday to the American and British governments "to stop all support of the unstable dictator".

NGO's are nothing more than front groups for foreign governments to interfere in foreign countries without using their bombs, troops or their intelligence services.

The Human Rights activists are the groups that assist, fund , support and represent the interests of the terrorists in every nation. Just as the US funded NGO's were involved in the Ukranian Orange Revolution - so the NGO's and 'human rights groups' in Pakistan were tools of foreign Wahhabist Islamist powers - mainly Saudi Arabian who fund those groups.

http://www.iraqtimeline.com/1996/ciareport.html

http://www.atimes.com/c-asia/CJ26Ag01.html

http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/003557.html

http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/003558.html

http://inthenameofdemocracy.org/en/node/157

http://www.workers.org/2006/world/ngos-0216/

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=1638


The Telegraph does not care about democracy in Pakistan , it cares only that the Tory Party carries on being its compliant whore.

The Telegraph is owned by the Barclay brothers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_and_Frederick_Barclay

The Barclay Brothers are both Conservative party members and donors to the Tory Party. Their support via the Telegraph is worth tens of millions of pounds in free advertising.

As soon as the Barclay Brothers took over the Telegraph they sacked the only decent journalist on the paper Mark Steyn.

The Spectator, owned by the Telegraph group, is now edited by the simpering chinless wonder, Matthew d'Ancona, is also a Pro-Tory magazine.

For all those mugs that think we have a 'free press' in this country, you need to get a grip.

The price of a 'free press' is lies, the Tyranny of the Minorities, the Corporatocracy and a pseudo-democracy where the media decide who gets elected.

Good for Musharraff for realising where the real 'anti-power' resides in his country and for taking action to deal with it.