The Jim Dowson & Andrew Brons Parties

Image - Jim Dowson hard at work building his new nationalist party, The Britain First Party.




News coming in that the Paul Golding / Jim Dowson money making scam continues to increase in size as its income drops, with the accouncement that they are to form a new political party.

This will be led by Paul Golding with Jim Dowson in the background busy milking the cash cow members that they hope will join their new party.

I hope Jim remembers to warm up his cold, clammy hands before he grabs hold of the teats of the party members that join.

Cash cows dont like cold, clammy hands - nor topless models apparently.

Unless the new Dowson / Golding party seeks to occupy a civic nationalist position, then it will have to compete with the BNP, National Front and the British Democratic Party of Andrew Brons / Arthur Kemp.

This week also brings the BNP Ideas Party Conference where it is expected that they will announce their formation of a new party as well.

Two in a fortnight.

They seem like buses - you wait for ages then two come at once.

One would have thought that logic would dictate that Brons & co would join the Dowson Cash Cow Party, or the Moo Nationalists as I like to call them, but it appears that personality conflicts within both groups means two new groups will form.

It may be that they have a cunning plan, where at the conference Brons will announce he plans to join Britain First.

That means that into a rather small and airless sack, a collection of egotistical, angry cats will be forced to occupy a very small space.

We all know that the only thing that would unite such a party would be their hate for Griffin, not any personal, ideological or political cohesion, hence within a few months it would crash and burn.

After Brons recent letter to the Tyndallite group celebrating JT's birthday, it appears that the Brons / Kemp party will seek to position itself on the old Far Right ground that the BNP used to be on before Griffin decided the BNP was a personality cult based around the Fuhrer Principle.

This will though put it in direct competiton with the National Front - and also in direct breach with the Equality Commission the moment that it announced as Brons is an elected member of the EU - and unless the new party constitution is not 'unlawful' as per the dictates of the Race Relations Gestapo led by Trevor 'Heinrich' Phillips, then it will be forced to change its constitution rather like the BNP.

This issue is academic for the NF though, as even though its constitution is unlawful it does not have any elected members and hence the Equality Commission have no interest in forcing it to obey the law.

This new Brons / Kemp party means that around 25 % of the BNP will leave the BNP and go to join up with it.

That means the BNP will be massively weakened as a result.

Not that Griffin cares of course, as the remaining 75 % of the BNP will still ensure he has enough of an income to keep him happy.

So these are the possible permutations ;

1) Dowson /Golding for a new party

2) Brons / Kemp form a new party

3) Brons / Golding / Kemp/ Dowson for a new party.

4) The BNP splits and a rump of activists leave to join Brons new party / Brons, Golding, Kemp, Dowson Party.

So in one week we will have gone from one Far Right party, the NF, to potentially three with the BNP split in two and left as the only ethno-nationalist party or the BNP faces two new ethno-nationalist parties on its turf.

What with the EDP under Butler ripping itself apart as the influence of his BNP clique begins to exert itself in the paty and alienate the civic nationalist liberal cringers in the English pseudo-Nationalist movement - then it appears that the EDP itself may be already starting to fall apart into factionalism with resignations almost every day.

Interesting times indeed.

The English Democrats and Ethnic Cleansing

Yesterday I got into an online argument with a member of the English Democrats and an English Nationalist about the Ethnic English.

According to this English Nationalist, the Ethnic English do not exist and anyone talking about them existing as an ethnic community in England is a racist.

Apparently in order to be 'English' one needs only to reside in England.

I asked him' Is Abu Hamza English' and 'Does that mean that Islamist Colonists in Tower Hamlets who do not even speak English, are they English'.

No answer.

So according to the English Democrats and English Nationalists there is no such thing as the Ethnic English.

Whilst Jews exist in Israel, Zulu's in South Africa and the Innuit in the Arctic etc etc - the only indigenous group in the world that deso not exist are the Ethnic English.

In an act of Ethnic Cleansing that would have made the Nazis proud, the Ethnic English according to the English Nationalists do not exist and have never existed.

That of course, means we can be wiped out by mass immigration and ethnic cleansing / white flight as we never existed in the first place.

Hitler would have been proud of that logic.

If this is the sort of English Nationalist that Eddy butler supports - and his idiot army of halfwit ants that follow him as another cringe making example of the pathetic cult of personality in nationalism - then you know where you can stick it.

Any Nationalist that calls themself an English Nationalist and supports this level of racist Civic Nationalist bullshit is a disgrace - not just to the English folk, but to our nation itself.

New British Fascism - The Rise of the British National party

I havent read the book New British Fascism - the Rise of the British National Party by Matthew Goodwin, though I will make an effort to do so - though most such books about the BNP are trite, boring and tedious to read.

Only those on the inside, know the truth about the BNP and how it is run.

I did read Eddy Butlers critique of the book on his blog though, and to be frank it was only partly correct.

There are primarily two reasons why the BNP has not become a mainstream organisation, and the first of these reasons is Nick Griffin himself.

Griffins methodology has always been to purge those more talented from him from the party. Anyone with any skills, talents or ability within the party are either expelled, persecuted until they leave by Griffin or hounded by his thugs until they walk away.

I realised this years ago.

Hence why I never rejoined the party after 2001.

As a British Nationalist my loyalty was not to Griffin but to the principles of British Nationalism and the party and its members - but in order to ensure that those principles were protected the only way to do so was to ensure I was never seen as a threat by Griffin - hence I did not rejoin the party, did not stand for any senior leadership positions and by so doing thereby defused Griffins paranoia.

That is also why for the past decade prior to my leaving my role as legal officer, I was in effect virtually running the BNP for Griffin.

Most of the new ideas, innovations and successes we had as a political party were based on my ideas being spoon fed to Griffin and him then applying them to the party via his dictatorial powers.

I sat on the party Steering Group with Griffin and Simon Darby and also sat on the AC.

I was on the phone to Griffin up to five times a day - in fact virtually all the important decisions in the party were based on my input.

It was not until Jim Dowson joined the party and turned Griffins emphasis from politics to making money that my influence waned over Griffin.

As soon as Dowson seduced and grooomed Griffin and led him by his porcine greedy nose with the promise of loot and lucre, Griffin lost interest in running the party as a POLITICAL PARTY and instead he began to run it as a PONZI SCHEME.

Hence why the party began to collapse from that point.

Griffin is in fact inept.

The image of him being competent is simply propaganda peddled by the party to its members, who are stupid enough to believe it.

I and John Bean wrote the Rebuilding British Democracy political manifesto which was called the 'best nationalist political manifesto of all time' ( I even invented the title of the manifesto ) whilst I and Andrew Moffat wrote the last political manifesto that was used in the lead up to the European elections and that got Griffin elected.

It wasnt Griffin.

Griffin took the credit though.

In fact most of my time in the BNP was spent stopping Griffin from making cock ups that would make a village idiot blush with shame.

For instance the classic case of the missing Fifty Grand.

When John Tyndall died Griffin believed that fifty thousand pounds in John Tyndalls bank account was money owed to the party, as Tyndall had been left the money in a will for it to be used for the benefit of the BNP.

With the money now in the hands of Joihn Tyndalls wife, Griffin wanted to force her to hand the money over to him.

One afternoon I got a phone call from a certain individual (you know who you are) who said to me ' Lee, me and Nick have been talking and we have a great idea about the money'.

Instantly the radar lit up - when Griffin had a good idea it was usually on a par with juggling hand grenades with the pins pulled out.

'Ok whats the idea' I asked.

' Nick and I think we should contact Valerie Tyndall and say that neither of us should keep the money. Instead we should donate the whole fifty thousand pounds to the legal fund for Ernst Zundel'.

For those who dont know, Ernst Zundel was at that time being prosecuted for Holocaust Denial and Holocaust Revisionism.

After telling the person ever so politely that it was the most stupid idea in political history and that no, we were not going to donate fifty grand to a holocaust deniers legal fund and that instead we were going to allow Valerie Tyndall to keep the money as the negative publicity generated from taking her to court would outweigh any financial benefit from obtaining the money from her let alone giving it to Ernst Zundel, I then had to inform Griffin of the same thing.

Thats not the only example of Griffins utter stupidity.

The 'Gurkhas are mercenaries', the ' lets give everyone a machine gun ', the Question Time farrago and countless others were Griffins all messes I had to try and clean up.

It was a dirty messy job, but seeing as most other people were too busy brownosing Griffin and would never say boo to the Fuhrer, it was down to me to try and constrain his imbecility and meglomania and put the party interests first.

The second reason why the BNP did not ever go mainstream was due to the fact that the BNP is not a political party motivated by practical political realities and objectives.

In fact the BNP is a cult of personality, not a political party.

It is run like a corrupt third world country, with Griffin as Mugabe and his officers appointed not on the basis of talent - but solely on the basis of their loyalty to Griffin.

Woe betide anyone whose public profile gets too high and their and their comptence as a politicians too highly regarded - they are gone.

Alby Walker was the perfect example of this.

The decision to replace Alby Walker with Simon Darby as the candidate in Stoke was simply to ensure that Alby Walker would be forced to leave the party - as he had become too popular with the activists, too competent in his role and too well respected by the public.

He threatened Griffins cult of personality and also his image.

You see Griffin can only appear to be a winner when he surrounds himself with losers.

That way the 'winner' is obvious.

Griffin cannot stand anyone ever being revealed as a potentially better leader than him, as by doing so Griffin faces being removed as the leader.

Hence he surrounds himself with halfwits, crawlers, lick spittles and non-party members like myself and Pat Harrington who cannot threaten his position in the party.

People say ' why is Harrington second in command in the BNP', well its because he is not a member of the BNP and hence cannot stand for leadership of the party and against Griffin.

Hence he was given power over those mugs that are members and could threaten Griffin.

The fact that at one time I was described as 'Griffins Rasputin' was in fact correct ( and funny ).

After I was no longer Griffins Rasputin it was Jim Dowson, who was also never a member of the party.

Now Harrington is his Rasputin, simply as Pat cannot threaten his position as leader and because Pat is one of the handful of competent people in the BNP.

Griffin runs the BNP as a cult of personality as the losers in the BNP allow him to do so.

The Griffinite window lickers are not interested in nationalism, nationalist principles, taking power, financial transparency, accountability, internal democracy and all those other piffling things like those - all they care about is being a Griffinite arse licking lick spittle.

Thats the reality of the BNP.

Its run by Griffin simply for the benefit of Griffin.

IT IS NOT A POLITICAL PARTY.

Those authors, critics and others who pontificate about the BNP and its ideology know nothing about the reality of the power structure at the top of the BNP.

I did.

For a decade I was one of the three people that ran the BNP.

In fact I can honestly say that it was my advice that reined in Griffin long enough for the BNP to go from the marginalised sect it was when I joined the party to its entrance into the mainstream.

It was only with the arrival of the crook Jim Dowson, and his seduction of Griffin with the promise of unlimited riches derived from defrauding the members and his takeover as the primary adviser of Griffin, that the BNP began its collapse into the pathetic joke it is today.

But thats another article for another day.

So Eddy is wrong to say that it is just the lack of middle class people in the party that has caused the crisis in the BNP.

He is part right, as those people have the skills and talents the party needed to grow into the mainstream.

The primary issue as Butler will no doubt confirm - is that Griffin purged the talent from the party and ensured that moderate people were repulsed by the party by his deliberate comments to the media, especially during election times, that ensured the party remained small and Griffin its tin pot fuhrer in perpetuity.

Those endless gaffes Griffin in the media made were not accidents, they were designed to ensure the party remained a small and powerless cult on the margins of society as by so doing it repulsed real talent from joining - as that way the Ant Emperor could remain forever the Ant Emperor of his BNP Ant Empire.

All Hail the Ant Emperor Griffin !

The Plan for the EDP Exposed !

I listened to Eddy Butler on the British Resistance site last night.

Thanks to this chat I now realise what Eddys strategy is.

This is confirmed by a post put up by Morris himself ;


" But it was Eddy's response to the question about the English Democrats that had me worried and start looking down a different path to where Eddy seems to want us to go. Although he did not say it in so many words he seemed to be pushing this Party a little bit too much for my liking and I would like him to clarify the situation via his site.

Basically it seems that Eddy's idea (or one of them) is for the English all to rush off and join the English Democrats and for the Welsh, Scots and Irish to go off and form something similar in their countries. They would all then operate as independant areas, each with their own party chairman, etc. "


Thats the plan.

This is why Sharon Ebanks and others are now undertaking a systematic plot of entryism into the EDP, in order to take over the EDP and use it as part of this plan for regional parties to replace the BNP as a national party.

This idea will never work.

For a start the EDP will now start to split down the middle as the civic nationalists already in the EDP, the racial nationalists and others from the BNP who want to use the EDP for their own aims and others with their own agendas all start to form sides in the party.

We will see the EDP start to split along the same lines as the BNP - which means the biggest British Nationalist party is left in chaos as a useless rump unable to take power just as the largest English Civic Nationalist party, the EDP, goes through the same thing - thereby effectivvely disabling the British nationalist movement and the English nationalist movement at the same time.


The fact is that any regional nationalism is the precurser to the disintegration of the United Kingdom.

The pathetic Scottish Parliament, a mewling multi-cultural, politically correct joke, and its pitiful Welsh Parliament counterpart need to be dismantled, not an English version added to the present chaos.

The problem in our democracy is that we have allowed too much of our national sovereignity to move outside Parliament and into the UN, supra-national globalist institutions like the World Bank and others, into the EU, NATO etc etc

We need to repatriate all those powers from those external institutions and repatriate them to Parliament and to the British people.

At the same time we need to ensure that the cleverest people in Britain, not just the witless party political carreerist lackeys who brown nose their way up the greasy political party pole, get into power.

We need a meritocracy not a pseudo-democracy run by banksters and media barons.

That means we need a new political system based on individuals appointed into Parliament solely on merit and intelligence, as opposed to them being the pathetic functionaries of corrupt political parties funded by crooked hedge fund traders and foreign media barons who can buy elections.

The plan for the regional parties requires a Scottish Democrats Party and a Welsh Democrats Party also to be established, which will never happen as they have strong regional parties already in existence to soak up the nationalist vote into their pseudo-nationalist political parties like Plaid Cymru and the SNP.

Therefore the plan is stillborn before it can even draw breath.

What we need is a new form of British Cultural Nationalism that can unite the Scottish, Northern Ireland and Welsh Nationalists in a new vision of nationalism that protects the indigenous ethnic folk of our lands, that supports the promotion of our indigenous ethnic folk cultures and that promotes a view of Britishness and British culture based on the promotion of all the indigenous folk cultures of our lands that form the basis of the British nation and British culture.

Thats why we have created in the British Freedom Party.

The BNP Big Tent Theory

The perpetual pipe dream of nationalists, decade after decade, is the utopian vision of The Nationalist Big Tent, a party for all factions to join and unite around.

Yet decade after decade nationalists have destroyed this vision with their factionalism, sectarianiam and indiscipline.

I have just read the article on Eddy Butlers blog and his laudable, but impossible, plea for a BNP Big Tent with every faction re-joining the party.

His agenda is to get all those who have fallen out with Griffin, regardless of the damage they have caused the party, to unite against Griffin in order for the mythical vision of the Big Tent to materialise.

Nationalist unity in one party is impossible, but what is achievable is Nationalist Unity of Purpose, where each party agrees not to tear the other shreds, not to attack nationalists instead of attacking the enemy and not to allow sectarian hatred to get in the way of co-operation.

The BNP will not collapse.

Griffin will not allow Eddy back in, so the Reform Group needs itself to undergo a reformation - not around a figurehead outside the BNP but around one inside the BNP.

The Big Tent idea that the hatred between nationalists accrued over the years will be solved as the BNP is once again filled with all the ex-Nazis, Nazis, moderates, Tory reactionaries, Leftist Nationalists, liberal nationalists and others who have fled the party / been expelled by the party / fallen out with Griffin etc etc is frankly a recipe for chaos and constant infighting.

The idea of Nationalist Unity is the bankrupt idea of ideologically bankrupt
nationalism.

Nationalists only see things in terms of us and them, not long term gain from long term co-operation.

This is why so many Griffinite sock puppets spend so much time on the internet attacking new nationalists parties like the Freedom Party.

They fear anything that is not part of their little club.

The tragedy is that the BNP and Freedom Party are not antagonistic to each other, we appeal to different political demographics.

In fact we compliment each other, as by the Freedom Party becoming a home for those Cultural Nationalists as opposed to racial nationalists in the BNP - the BNP can stop trying to straddle both camps, stop appealing to neither sides and finally start to develop a coesive internal structure in order to campaign on racial nationalist issues.

This is a democracy, and racial nationalists have as much right to have a party that represents their political position as the Far Left Marxists and Communists have a right to form their own political parties in our democratic system.

The problem is that just as Nick Griffin has become synonymous with the BNP, Eddie Butler has become synonymous with his agenda of removing Griffin.

The harsh reality is that the majority of the BNP want NEITHER OF THEM IN CHARGE.

Hence the fact that the more eddy tries to run the anti-Griffin reform campaign, the more the campaign for reform within the BNP itself is marginalised.

What the BNP needs is a new start, not just a head transplant.

Eddy should use his formidable organisational skills to organise the future campaign to get a new leader elected, not just organise meetings where Griffin is the focus of complaints but the ground work to prepare for his removal is neglected.

That is why only someone like Brian Mahoney with the assistance of people like Michael Barnbrook, Andrew Brons, Chris Bev, Nick Cass and Richard Edmonds all working together can save the BNP and also save the ideology of Racial Nationalism from vanishing from the political landscape itself. Eddy should of course run the elections unit of this reformed BNP.

The BNP will not win elections espousing Racial Nationalism, or even Ethno-Nationalism, but at least it will be able to keep those memes alive in the national political environment until some point in the future when the civil war with Islamists commences and our people then develop a consciousness of being part of an ethnic community, and they will will coalesce around such memes and resist the threat of Islamism in our nation and society.

I will repeat again - the British Freedom Party has no interest in the BNP collapsing.

We do not want BNP members to join the Freedom Party and we do not want BNP members to abandon the principles of racial nationalism that are at the heart of the BNP.

What we wanted, and still do, is to create a new nationalist movement out of the non-politicised masses.

That way we do not have to have people in the Freedom Party who are so polluted with hate of each other that the party becomes like a sack of angry cats tearing great chunks of fur out of each other.

The problem with the Freedom Party was that we recruited into our ranks a few people who were unsuitable to be in both the BNP and the Freedom Party, these being reactionary bougeoise tory types who thought the Freedom Party should be a social club not a voice for the same sort of New Nationalism spreading all across Europe.

We do not intend to make that mistake again.

The Freedom Party is at the vanguard of the New Nationalism in Britain, we are not going to be a club for reactionary tories and limp wristed liberals masquerading as 'nationalists'.

We cannot take power if our party is filled with wilting, delicate flowers who seek the adoration of the enemies of our nation, folk and culture.

The reality of the situation in the BNP is that ;

1) Nick Griffin will not be removed by outside pressure

2) The party will not collapse, as the party is not a POLITICAL party anymore, it is a Ponzi scheme

3) The primary problem in the BNP is the members of the BNP. By them offering unconditional loyalty and obedience to Griffin, time after time and mistake after mistake, they have allowed him to become the unaccountable leader he has become. You get what you pay for.

4) The BNP will continue with Griffin in charge, absorbing money from nationalists and squandering it on participating in plotics and going nowhere. Instead of that money being used to build aa new nationalist social movement, civil rights movement, lobby groups and other organisations - the money will continue to be poured down the political drain.

5) The BNP cannot change its fundamental nature, as the membershp are in the grip of a pathetic Cult Of Personality psychology, hence whoever is elected to replace Griffin has to dump his Stalinist constitution ( and Tyndalls Fuhrer Prinzip constitution as well ) and create a new constitution that empowers the officers, members and officials. The problem then would be that it would expose the sectarian hatreds within the BNP, the Griffinites would cause an internal war and the party would implode again. The primary proble would be the rump of Griffinite loyalists left inside the party who would work not for the party, but for the interests of Griffin - who of course would be plotting to get the party back again under his control.

Unless Griffin resigns from the party or is expelled, then he and his cohorts would constantly undermine the new leadership.

6) The BNP as a political brand is now so synonymous with Griffin , that most neutral observers realise the party is toxic politically to the masses. The pictures of Tyndall in his Nazi uniform waving camply at the swastika flag will forever remain to undermine the roots of the party as a serious force in politics, whilst Griffins endless gaffes about the Holocaust, Gurkhas and the KKK on Question Time will remain to be used against the party in elections.

The idea of a Big Tent depends upon a strong ring master, someone who can crack the whip over the various snarling factions who are forever at each others throats.

It is Politics as a circus.

My suggestion to eddie is this - dump the reform agenda and instead start to amass funds and people to promote a candidate within the party who is prepared to stand against Griffin and who stands on a platform of dumping the present constitution and fundamental reform. Turn the Reform Group into a proto- campaign group so whoever decides to stand is capable of having a campaign group with access to funds to assist them in campaigning for leadership.

At the same time as you are raising funds, then people inside the party need to start taking court actions against Griffin.

All it would take is a member to launch an action for ;

1) Griffin to be removed as a leader for Gross Incompetence and breach of duty of care to the party as defined under the constitution re the Marmite case, legal cases against Kenny Smith and Michaela Mackenzie and the failures to have the accounts ready and done properly for the EC. The BNP constitution makes Griffin responsible for all these gaffes and therefore he will be held liable for them.

2) A member should go to court and seek to impose personal financial liability for the costs of the Marmite Case against the three people who made the decision to upload that film on the internet - Griffin, Golding and Dowson - the party unlawfully paid their costs in this case. They acted in such a way, contrary to the law, their duty to the party and the party constitution, that they are personally liable for the debts the party had to pay for the Marmite Case, and therefore their personal assets should be seized to pay the party back those costs it accrued.

This will distract Griffin and send a message to his officers that they will be held liable for their actions once a new leadership is imposed.

At the same time, my suggestion to who will be standing against Griffin is this - DO NOT ANNOUNCE YOUR CANDIDACY UNTIL THE PAPERWORK HAS GONE IN, as if you do so before then, Griffin will manufacture a reason to expel / suspend you.

Eddy needs to concentrate on getting a list of the required number of active members in the BNP who are prepared to sign the paperwork.

Eddy should ask all the people in the areas where the Reform Group is active to prepare a list of vetted members who would be prepared to sign the nomination papers, but insist they remain under the radar until the potential candidate announces they will stand - then it will be a simple matter to get the required number of signatures.

At the same time, eddy needs to start a fighting fund to raise money for the campaign and also to take legal action in the event Griffin refuses to hand over the membership lists as he did last time.

Griffin is only going to fight fair if he is forced too.

The Reform Campaign is finished.

It now needs to prepare to become a campaign group for whoever is the potential candidate.

Andrew Brons has stated he does not want to be leader.

There is only one man in the nationalist movement suitable and qualified to lead the BNP and who everyone would support - and that is Brian Mahoney.

Brian Mahoney is a true British Nationalist and with his partner Jenny Noble as treasurer, the party would finally have a competent and honest leadership.

I would suggest that the new candidate not stand as a'leader' of the BNP solely on their own, but instead they assemble a cabinet around him / her and then stand as a new leader, with a new cabinet and a new constitution.

How about either Brain Mahoney as leader or Chris Bev, Nick Cass as party manager, Eddy Butler as Elections Officer, Jenny Noble as treasurer, Richard Edmonds as cultural officer, Michael Barnbrook as Discipinary officer, Andrew Brons as party press spokesman and Martin Wingfield as party publications officer.

Any candidate that does this stands far more chance of winning, though such a victory may itself be a poisoned chalice.