Snippets from the News

The Liberal Loonies led by Ming the Muppet want to have an amnesty for illegal immigrants. The last thing this country needs is more Liberalism and more Immigrants. Thankfully the fossil that leads the party of the idiot fringe will not get elected into any serious position of power.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article2485434.ece

For an example of how our country and civilisation is facing problems because of failure to create a society and communities based on nature, as opposed to ideology, the article below is very interesting.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article2484976.ece

The menopause exists to ensure that women have free time to help to look after their young grandchildren, new research has suggested.

A study of two African villages stretching back to 1950 has found that children have a distinct survival advantage if they have a maternal grandmother with no infants of her own to help their mother to look after them.

The results appear to support the evolutionary theory that the menopause emerged as a means of ensuring that young mothers have extra help while bringing up their children. An alternative theory suggests that the menopause occurs to reduce the risk older women face of dying in childbirth.

This is evidence of the neccesity for a nation state based on Communities rather than the facile notion of Society as promulgated by the current political elites. What we need to do is create a country based on communities with extended families and kin based communities. This means Grandmothers would be living in the same communities with their extended families offering them support and guidance instead of miles away in distant towns or in other countruies due to them white flighting the country. Instead of the Politically Correct Nannny State running the country we could have the Nanny Family where the family takes care of the family instead of the State taking charge of parenting in order to brainwash our children into being little PC Robots.

Top Cops Wake Up.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=NWTUCVQPSREOBQFIQMFCFFWAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/09/19/nmigrant119.xml

Apparently the Police are worried about immigrant crime affecting their performance targets and hence their politicalyl correct Brown Nosing promotions and pensions ( for the rules of promotion these days in the police the rules are blame white racists for everything even race attacks on whites and insert nose firmly up the arse of the nearest Labour politician ) . Instead of arresting Kittens for Criminal Damage for attacking balls of wool, the Police have realised that they have to do a real job and arrest those things called criminals. As this means getting involved in policing instead of pretending to be social workers in uniform, this means a few of them have come into contact with these things called 'criminals' and some of these ( SHOCK ! HORROR ) are FOREIGNERS. Therefore the police now want more money (AS USUAL) to do the bloody job they should have been doing all along. Useless bastards.

Even The Guardian is on the story with this article - http://www.guardian.co.uk/crime/article/0,,2172376,00.html - which links Immigrants with knife crime and drink driving. Soon the Guardian is going to release a story on the link between breathing and oxygen.

Between 2003 and 2004 the number of foreign nationals arrested in the county for drink-driving soared from 57 to 966, although it has since fallen by two-thirds. ( Probably because all the drink drivers are now on benefits and can afford to get cabs or they use the police as taxis to drive them back from the pub at night and then get tucked up in bed bythe cops, read a story in their own language by the coppers and then given a police regulation teddy bear. )

In another example of the bloody obvious resold as 'news' the article below is also interesting

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/19/ncre119.xml

The C.R.E says the nation is fractured - well they should know seeing as they are the mechanism that has been used to destroy our country, society and communities. Multi-Culturalism destroys communities, immigration destroys countries and the C.R.E has been the fascist enforcement mechanism to ensure any dissent is criminalised and dissidents are imprisoned.

With all the powers of the old witchunters the CRE during the time of the New Cromwell ( Blair ) went around the country looking for witches (racists ) and devilry ( racism ) - and with their own special powers of perception saw witches and devilry everywhere ( Institutional Racism ). Trevor Phillips, or The Witchfinder General, as we who hold him in contempt call him, then went out from town to town burning witches in public ( sacking them from their jobs ) if they wore the sign of the devil on their clothes ( the badge of england such as on the lapel of the sacked HMP prison officer ) or wore the sign of the devil ( a Union Jack Tattoo ) on their skin ( football fans who tried to leave the country during England games ).

The wankers that ran the CRE ( such as Furball Singh the drunk cricket hooligan who threatened to headbutt a copper http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2177809.stm) are the reason why we have Fractured Society. After the hearing Singh was obliged to tender his resignation from his £100,000 a year job and, although he was given a £115,000 pay off, his career was effectively over. He had a nice tax payers cheque for being sacked (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2179802.stm ).

A hundred grand a year for Ghostbusting ( looking for the phantoms of institutional racism that the proffessional hysterics and shysters of the race relations industry see everywhere ) is a nice little earner. Only drug dealers , wankers in the media and the race relations industry earn that sort of dough a year.

The good news though is that Singh is now in Iraq ( http://www.rediff.com/news/2004/jan/05shyam.htm ) Singh is only one of four British officials to be appointed to a six-figure salary job in the new Iraqi administration being set up with the help of the US Agency for International development (USAID).

Oh the joys of being an ethnic minority in the UK. One law for them, one law for us - as bloody usual.

The BNP and the ANC - PART 1

Nick Griffin is our Nelson Mandela.

One of the defining features of the Gordon Brown faction within the Labour Party that is now running the country is their defining obsession to ‘take back’ the symbols of Britishness from ‘the Far Right’. Gordon Brown is utterly obsessed with trying to create a politically correct and artificial version of British history and British culture that supports, and thereby promotes, the left wing political view of the Labour Party. He is always banging on about how the left must ’reclaim the British flag’ and promote a modern multi-cultural version of Britishness. As a disciple of the social theorist Robert Puttnam, Gordon Brown realises that unless a functional politically correct version of Britishness is created then the various ethnic tensions and social dynamics within multi-culturalism will mean multi-culturalism will collapse as a functional principle of social organisation at some point in the future.

Along with this attempt to redefine and recapture the symbols of British culture and history by Gordon Brown has been an attempt to describe history in a way that promotes the personalities and causes that they want to see regarded as examples of noble idealism by British society. For Gordon Brown the primary noble personality, and therefore the ultimate socially acceptable role model for whites in the world today, who is lauded for his so called ‘selfless idealism’ is Nelson Mandela. For the liberals and the left Nelson Mandela is a hero, not a terrorist.

They worship him like the Soviets once worshipped busts of Lenin and Stalin. His cause to overthrow apartheid and create majority black rule in South Africa is celebrated as a noble cause and statues to the man are now even erected in Parliament Square.

In this article I will offer a radical nationalist re-interpretation of Mandela’s struggle for black majority rule and explain how the liberals current view on Ethno-Nationalist struggles in Europe is both hypocritical but also logically and morally unsustainable when compared directly to Mandela’s struggles and aims. Whilst the ANC and Nelson Mandela should never be regarded as ’moral’ in any way due to their advocacy and use of terrorism as part of the political process, what is interesting is how the media and the liberal elite have managed to turn Mandela into a ‘hero’ without ever logically analysing what other political white majority movements could also be regarded as ’heroic and noble’ for following similar political aims, though with less criminal political methodology.

The ANC are a racist terrorist organisation based on communist ideology. It is an organisation to be despised and not admired. This article is an analysis of the logical inconsistencies of the Liberals view on the ANC and Nelson Mandela, and should not be taken in any way as implying any support for the ANC or Nelson Mandela. South Africa today is a racist state which has institutionalised racism against its white citizens just as Britain has institutionalised racism against its indigenous people. The purely cosmetic whiteness of South African sporting teams, such as the Springboks rugby team, is used to divert attention away from the ongoing pernicious racialism of the South African ANC government directed daily against its white citizens. Most whites in South Africa live in fear of the day that Nelson Mandela dies for they fully expect a black uprising that will inflict racist riots and pogroms against all whites. The brutalisation of white South Africans by racist criminals, especially racist rapes, is devastating the white community and hundreds of thousands of white South Africans have already fled the country. The New South Africa is becoming a racist terror state, not a representative democracy.

Even within the history of the ANC as regards the non-white population of South Africa we can see a racial dimension at work. The ANC represents mainly the Zhosa tribal group and their main enemy was always the Inkatha Zulu tribal group. Thousands have been murdered in ethnic and political warfare between the two tribal groups. Asians and mixed race people were also despised by the ANC for working with the whites. The whites that joined the ANC were mainly deluded idealists prepared to sing songs about killing whites and plant bombs in railway stations in order to curry favour and rise amongst the ranks of their black comrades. The fact that many of these white supporters of the ANC struggle have now fled South Africa citing the racism of the ANC regime is evidence once again of the idiotic idealism of the far left. The political rhetoric of the ANC is today blatantly racist against whites and the South African government supports the racist pogroms of Robert Mugabe in neighbouring Zimbabwe against white farmers. White farms are being seized by the ANC South African government and white businesses being punitively taxed by the South African government. White owned businesses are forced to hire blacks from the majority population, as opposed to hiring whites from the minority ethnic population as is usual under the rules of political correctness, or be fined by the government.

But it is a fact that the actions of Nelson Mandela and the ANC are defined by the liberals and the left in our country as noble. If this true for the ANC then the cause of the BNP must also noble and heroic. Unlike the ANC and Nelson Mandela though, our hands are not stained with the blood of innocents torn apart by bombs, burning tyre necklaces and bullets used to get into power. Unlike the ANC we in the BNP are a peaceful, democratic, political, social and cultural movement who reject violence and whose actions are at all times within the Rule of Law as defined by the British Constitution. That is in direct contrast to the ANC and the actions of Nelson Mandela.

Nelson Mandela is the most successful Racial Nationalist of all time.

He fought for and won Black majority democratic rule in South Africa in the face of determined opposition from a well organised white minority. Whilst Nelson Mandela and the ANC fought for democratic Black majority rule in South Africa, Nick Griffin and the BNP are also fighting for democratic White majority rule in Great Britain. Both the ANC and the BNP are the political mechanisms of an indigenous rights movement. The BNP represents the indigenous ethnic majority of Great Britain and the ANC represent the native black population of South Africa. The ANC fought against Apartheid as the mechanism of minority rule in South Africa, whilst the BNP fights against Political Correctness as the mechanism of minority rule in Great Britain.

Just as Nelson Mandela has been persecuted and prosecuted by the South African government for his political beliefs, Nick Griffin has also been persecuted and prosecuted by the British government for his political beliefs. As Nelson Mandela has experienced, Nick Griffin has also been charged with ’political crimes’ against the State, this being breaches of the so called Race Relations Acts and the Public Order Act 1986. Unlike the ANC though and also Nelson Mandela, Nick Griffin and the BNP have never used terrorism, murder, bombings and violence as part of their political methodology to attain power. The BNP have always been a political, social and cultural movement that have participated in the democratic electoral process and have rejected all forms of organised political violence even when we have been targeted and attacked by both the Far Left and agents of the State security services. We have never even organised to defend ourselves from the attacks by the organised Far Left in a way that would have ensured we could have dealt with the threats we faced. Even though we were abandoned by the police and the authorities we did not respond in any way to those who attacked us. Like the workers in the Mask of Anarchy by Shelley we merely folded our arms and looked upon those that attacked us with the utter contempt they deserved until their rage died away and they crawled away in shame and baseless pride. This means that the BNP are in fact a more ’moral’ movement than the ANC, and that Nick Griffin is a more ’moral’ politician than Nelson Mandela.

Nick Griffin is in fact Britain’s Nelson Mandela. Like Nelson Mandela and Nick Griffin, all BNP activists and member should be seen as heroic and noble people who selflessly dedicate themselves to the preservation and promotion of their country, culture and kin. According to the liberals and liberal media Nelson Mandela fought for majority black rule in South Africa in order to end minority white rule and create a representative democracy. The goal of the ANC that it frequently proclaimed was to ensure that South Africa was a democracy that represented the interests of the ethnic majority as opposed solely to the interests of its ethnic minority, this being the whites. In a way the BNP and the ANC fight for the same thing, though in vastly different ways, which is the right to organise political, social and cultural representation for the indigenous ethnic majority and to participate in the democratic political system. We are also both indigenous rights movements. Just like the ANC we are fighting against minority ethnic rule. For the ANC the enemy was Apartheid, for us it is Political Correctness.

Both Apartheid and Political Correctness are mechanisms of minority rule. They are both political systems of repression that assert the rights of ethnic minorities over those of the ethnic majority. In Britain, as it was in South Africa under apartheid, the ethnic majority are under direct Minority Rule. This is the Tyranny of the Minorities that is the basis of the burden of Minority Rule that we indigenous Britons are forced to tolerate and pay for. The Tyranny of the Minorities is when the rights and interests of ethnic, political, social and economic minorities within the nation take precedence over the social interests and democratic rights of the indigenous ethnic British majority. This is the basis of our nations system of Minority Rule.

In Britain today we are controlled by a cabal of minorities ; these are the rules of Political Correctness, Middle East oil billionaires that fund the political parties, the laws of the Race Relations Acts and Public Order Acts, the Liberal Consensus, Media Corporations, Leftists, Globalists, Dhimmi-Politicians, Sharia Socialists, immigrant lobby groups, Liberal Judges, PC vicars and religious faith leaders, religious pressure groups, corrupt union bosses, foreign corporations and supra-national political institutions such as the EU, ECJ, ECHR, WTO and NATO. Each of these groups represent only the rights and privileges of factions and minorities within the nation and do not the interests of the ethnic majority of British citizens.

Pressure group politics and professional lobby groups dominate the democratic consultative processes, whilst the functions of the legal system and the outcomes of legal cases are dependent upon those ethnic groups and other organisations that are financially able to access the legal system.

The New Apartheid in 21st Century Britain is based on Political Correctness. Just like apartheid was in South Africa, political correctness in Britain is a political mechanism designed to empower minority groups at the expense of the majority ethnic group. It is part of the Cultural Struggle and Racial Struggle of the left to subvert and destroy our native indigenous British society.

Over the decades a succession of minority Conservative and Labour governments have controlled the country via minority rule in order to advance their own sectarian interests. Not once has any of those governments had the democratic legitimacy of having the direct approval of over 50 % of the British population. The total electorate in the 2005 general election registered to able to vote was 44, 245, 939 in a country with a population of nearly 60 million - that means nearly 16 million people are not even registered to vote. 61.3 % of the total electorate able to vote actually bothered to vote. The present unelected Prime Minister Gordon Brown runs a government that was voted into power in 2005 with just 54.95 % of seats in Parliament with just 35.3 % of the vote and with the support of only 21.59 % of the British population ( not including the 16 million who did n ot register to vote). 79% of the British people did not vote for the present government, but the voices of the silent majority are not heard in the political process. Only 8 candidates in the whole country got more than 50 % of the votes cast in their favour - and hence had a democratic mandate. Labour won the election with a vote of 35.3 % of 61.3 % of those that actually turned out - not even a majority of those who bothered to vote. With a simple majority in Parliament the minority rule politicians can control the entire country.

That is not a legitimate democratic system. Neither is that a democratic mandate to rule, that is the very definition of Minority Rule and it is the capture of democracy through the capitulation of the majority to either apathy or alienation. These minority governments both left and right then undertake political programmes that primarily represent and reward the sectarian interests that support the parties themselves. The Labour Party passes laws to help the unions that fund it and gives knighthoods to the foreign businessmen that also fund it, whilst the Tories represent the interests of the global corporations and the foreign businessmen that fund its political campaigns. Neither of the three big parties represent the People, they represent only sectarian factions within society. The Trades Unions represent only the financial interests of the union bosses who grow rich on membership fees of the unions and also the sectarian political interests of the political groups the unions support. The only people the unions do not represent is the interests of British workers. They represent the interests of Cuban and Chinese workers, globalisation, asylum seekers, immigrants and ethnic minorities and do not ever represent the interests of British workers.

Minority Rule is also enforced in the New Apartheid British state by the Race Relations Acts and the Equality Department that contains the C.R.E. The C.R.E and the rest of the state funded race relations industry are mechanisms designed to empower immigrants and ethnic minorities at the expense of the indigenous ethnic majority. The role of the C.R.E. is to ensure that the law pro-actively discriminates against the ethnic majority and that we white indigenous Britons become second class citizens, and a racial underclass, in our own country. The C.R.E pro-actively works with the government and private companies to ensure that ethnic minorities are fast tracked and promoted into jobs they are not qualified for whilst whites are denied jobs and systematically penalised because of their colour and race. The C.R.E recommends new race based laws to the government that it wants to see put on the statute books. These new laws are designed to promote Positive Discrimination policies and Affirmative Action programmes that accelerate the disenfranchisement of the indigenous British people from the economic process. The C.R.E, the media and the Police all ignore and minimise racial attacks on whites in Britain,whilst race attacks against ethnic minorities are turned into political crusades to demand the removal of ever more rights for whites. The Police are routinely dragged before Employment Tribunals for racism against white officers and white applicants for jobs are denied interviews they are qualified for so that under qualified ethnic minorities can benefit from affirmative actions plans.

In the New Apartheid of Political Correctness a whole new system of totalitarian Minority Rule has been constructed that just like under classic apartheid is a classic fascist race based system and that rewards a person solely on the grounds of their colour or racial background and not on individual merit. Indigenous white Britons in Britain are now nothing more than second class citizens in their own country, and that second class status is now fully enshrined in the law itself.

Another mechanism of Minority Rule is the takeover of our democratic system by the media. The media propagandise the political parties that the public are conditioned into voting into power. The media decide who wins elections, not the people. Through their power to control public opinion, to selectively present facts and ideas to the public and their almost total control of public debate on political issues, the media effectively control who the public vote for. It is the minority of plutocrats, corporations and leftist editors and journalists that control the media who unilaterally decide what is politically acceptable in our society and thereby who gets elected into power. It is the media liberals and leftists in papers like the Guardian who advertise the governments politically correct Servile State jobs whose self appointed experts then tell us that we cannot have closed borders because immigration benefits our society and at the same time imports in ever more new Labour Party voters. It is the media capitalists in papers like the Daily Mail that support ‘controlled immigration’ as it brings in cheap workers and lowers British workers wages and thereby benefit’s the corporations that advertise and sell their products in the Daily Mail. The media do not represent the interests of the British people, they represent and promote the interests solely of the corporations or factional interests that own the media and the puppet political parties the media control. The role of the media is to ensure that the interests of the majority of British citizens are not represented by political representatives that they are conditioned into voting into power. The media promote and advertise only the political parties that they own. Then once in power those elected politicians then reward their media and corporate masters with laws that profit the corporations that own the media. Only the corrupt and the servile ever get elected into power by the media. The agenda of the media is to prevent political change, not represent the interests of the British people or the British nation. The role of the Media is to ensure that their own factional interests, left, right and liberal, are allowed to control the political development of society by denying access to any political parties that threatens media minority rule over the British electoral system. It is the media that says we cannot close the borders of Britain, that we cannot deport immigrant illegals and criminals, that we cannot scrap political correctness and the Race Relations Acts. It is the media that demands our total adherence to the totalitarian creedo of Political Correctness by labelling anyone that dares speak out as a ‘racist‘. It is the media that calls those political parties like the BNP that demand the removal of illegal immigrants and convicted immigrant criminals ‘racists’ and then use their pages to demand that the public not vote for them. It is the media that bears the primary responsibility for our plight.

Another aspect our Minority Rule is the takeover of the so called ‘independent’ legal process by minority groups and supporters of Political Correctness. The liberal Judges that have infiltrated the British legal system now routinely overrule British statute laws with bogus ’human rights’ arguments that put inane theories on universal human rights before the actual national security interests of the majority of the British people. Other Judges have political interests that interact with their judicial roles. The recent libel case involving the BNP activists Chris and Barry Roberts was heard before Judge Sir Stephen Sedley, a long time member of the British Communist Party and President of the British Institute of Human Rights with links to Liberty and Amnesty International, is a case in point. Under the dicta enshrined in the Pinochet Principle in Re Pinochet (1998) the Judge should have withdrawn from the case as a long time member of the Communist Party can scarcely be said to be ambivalent to nationalism and nationalist activists in their court. This rule for Judges is in place in order to ensure that there is no chance of any judicial bias in legal cases. The law requires that Judges ‘ Must not appear biased or impartial ‘ . The Judges adherence to the Communist cause in the Barry and Chris Roberts case meant the Judge was not fit to hear a case involving well known Nationalist activists for the BNP involved in a libel case against a well known Communist election candidate and Communist supporter - this being the convicted liar and thief Gerry Gable of the Searchlight magazine. Instead of withdrawing from the case the Judge, and the other two judges on the bench hearing the appeal, found against the BNP members and at the same time ‘clarified‘ the position of the libel laws in the UK to ensure that the Roberts brothers and others in the future did not come under its protection. The Roberts Brothers were not told of the Judges political affiliations. This is the same Judge who said that too many black males had their DNA held on the Police computers and that therefore everyone in Britain should be required to provide a sample of their DNA to the police to hold on their computers. The role of Judges in the modern legal system is to repress and remove the rights of the ethnic majority and create a ’legal’ apartheid state where we, the indigenous British, are legally recognised as a racial underclass in our own country. Other judges, such as Sir Henry Hodge the husband of Margaret Hodge the Dagenham MP and vociferous critic of the BNP, who is jointly responsible for allowing the convicted immigrant murder Learco Chindamo to stay in the country after he is released from prison, place the interests of immigrant killers before the safety of society as a whole. Other judges blocked the Home Offices’ attempt to appeal the decision not to deport Chindamo after his release.

The BNP and ANC - PART 2

The Crown Prosecution Service and the Department Public Prosecutions are both run by appointees of the government. Baroness Amos, the Attorney General, is a labour party minister who is responsible for prosecuting race cases such as those against Nick Griffin. The previous Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith, authorised both the Iraq War and the arrest and prosecution of Nick Griffin. Along with the Judges, the police as an institution are the most racist organisation in the country. They are run by the politically correct Gestapo of ACPO, a collection of sycophants and Labour politician arse kissers who regards chasing their pensions and promotions as more important than fighting crime.

Along with the structural problems of our legal system we also face the unbelievable situation that the truth is no defence in charges related to race relations offences and thought crimes that are prosecuted in the courts. It is not whether what was said is true, but whether it is likely to incite racial hatred and is insulting, abusive or threatening, that matters. The police and courts fast track ethnic minority recruits into senior positions whilst being dragged through employment tribunals and being found guilty of racial discrimination against white officers and staff. The police prioritise criminal cases involving racism against ethnic minorities but refuse to record race attacks against whites by ethnic minorities as racist attacks. The police arrest white British people for having a gollywog in their shop window but let Asian Muslim Islamic terrorist supporters wave placards at demonstrations saying ’ Kill British Jewish Soldiers’. The police ban BNP members from being police officers but let suspected Al Qaeda terrorists, convicted criminals and women beaters stay working as police officers. The police will refuse to allow qualified white applicants to come for job interviews but will prioritise under qualified ethnic minority applicants. The Police at Hendon Training College in 2001 even had Gerry Gable of the Searchlight Group, who is a convicted theif and liar with links to a notorious communist paedophile, giving new police recruits left wing anti-racist political lectures on ’Knowing the Enemies of Society’. Presumably by that they meant the white enemies of the Multi-Cultural Society.

Today the police are the para-military wing of political correctness, the boot boys of the Far Left ever ready to crack open the skulls of any dissident protestor that dares defy the dictates of political correctness such as those at the Pro-Hunting rally in Parliament Square in 2004. The institutions of the state are being deliberately weakened and undermined as the least qualified applicants instead of the best qualified applicants are the most promoted. The standards of society are dropped so that the less able are able to succeed. Ethnic groups are taught to blame ‘racism’ for all the problems of their communities and thereby the ideals of self responsibility are replaced by the Grievances Industry and the search for ’racism’ inherent in our farcical compensation culture.

Political Correctness also has other similarities to Apartheid ;

A ) Political Correctness is predicated on asserting the rights of alien minorities over those of the indigenous minority. It represses the rights of the ethnic majority and rewards ethnic minorities with extra rights enshrined in law and enforced by the State. The country and society is then run for the interest of the ethnic minorities and not the ethnic majority. Ethnic minorities are able to use Positive Discrimination and Affirmative Action schemes established by the State to assert race based rights that usurp and undermine the rights of the indigenous British people. Laws such as the Race Relations Acts allow ethnic minorities to use their race as a factor in the economic system in order to directly disadvantage indigenous British whites eg the fast tracking of ethnic minority job applicants in companies to reflect ‘diversity’ and the establishment of ethnic minority only training schemes. These laws are coercive laws designed to undermine the right of private property. People are told they cannot ‘discriminate’ - in other words you are told that you cannot do as you wish with your own property or your own company - and must hire and employ only who the government tells you who you should be hiring eg ethnic minorities. The Public Order Act 1986 is used to ensure that the ethnic majority do not use their right to free speech in such a way that the government does not approve. The POA is also used to arrest and imprison political opponents of the government, and new laws coming in threaten to criminalise those who dare question aspects of history that the government demand must not be debated or questioned.

B) Political Correctness is inherently totalitarian, violent and repressive. It crushes all forms of dissent and imprisons anyone who dares defy its legal edicts. It is also physically violent. We all saw how the Metropolitan Police cracked open the skulls of the Pro-Hunting demonstrators in 2004 and how the blood of our people formed scarlet puddles in Parliament Square. Under political correctness the police have become social workers in uniform, the politicised New Labour Police Force. They ban the BNP from being police officers at the same time as forming a National Black Police Officers Association inside the police to directly represent the interests of black police officers, though of course white police officers are banned from having a white police officers association to represent their interests. The Police harass and intimidate BNP nationalist activists and allow our homes to be attacked by the far left. Political Correctness also contributed to the Iraq War as Tony Blairs justification for the war (after the WMD story was exposed as bullshit) was to build a democracy in Iraq. The idea that ’democracy’ and the Middle East are in any way synonymous or capable of unification is pure politically correct ideological claptrap. Most people would agree that it would be nice to have a democracy in Britain before we send troops to die for one in Iraq. The politically correct idea that liberal democracy is the ultimate political system and therefore that all nations must be forced to become liberal democracies as well, is the logic of Trotskyite perpetual revolution and Imperialism via consumerism given a pseudo-moralist gloss. Political Correctness is the ideology of perpetual war and it requires scapegoats ( racists, extremists, nationalists etc etc) in order to divert attention away from its own inherent contradictions and absurdities.

C) Political Correctness destroys our ancestral and civil rights. It bans all forms of free speech it disagrees with and imprisons those whose opinions it deems worthy of being criminalised. It undermines our constitutional rights to free speech and allows the government to criminalise those it wants silenced. It is expansionist and aggressive and has spread from the public realm into our private lives. Proposals from the Lawrence Inquiry were that ’racist’ speech in our own homes should be regarded as a criminal offence and prosecuted in court. It brainwashes our children in schools and allows the media to condition society through failing to regulate the power of the media. It allows the media to undermine the democratic electoral system and uses the courts and Judges to stifle political opposition groups and arrest and prosecute political leaders of political parties opposed to Political Correctness. It has created a ’Surveillance Society’ more insidious and pervasive than any nightmarish Orwellian totalitarian state. Political Correctness controls the BBC and the state broadcasting system and uses its powers to promote political correctness in British society.

D) Just like under the apartheid regime in South Africa political correctness buys the loyalty of the state via bribing the employees of the State through paying their wages. The Servile Sate in Britain is the countries biggest employer, and the government uses tax payers money to employ millions of parasitic lackeys of the Minority Rule State that depend entirely upon the Labour Party for their jobs. Thereby the votes of those state lackeys are captured for the Labour Party in election after election. Political Correctness allows millions of immigrants to enter the country and then calls the British people ’racists’ if they dare defy the immigration invasion. It ships in millions of new ethnic Labour voters who then ethnically cleanse entire white communities of their indigenous inhabitants and then turn them into strongholds for the Labour Party. In South Africa the black majority were prohibited from voting by the white minority government and this power was backed up with the powers of the police and the army. White majority rule in Great Britain is accomplished via the majority of the population refusing to participate in the corrupt electoral system. The majority are either unwilling or unable to vote because they are either disillusioned with, or alienated from, the political process. What matters is that in both the political system of apartheid in South Africa and the system of political correctness in the UK is that the interests of the majority are minimised and ignored in favour of minorities. In both systems the state was/ and is repressive of those parties outside the establishment that want to create the conditions for majority rule.

In Great Britain the assassinations of opposition politicians and opposition parties is accomplished not with bombs or bullets but via the assassination of their reputations and careers by the media. BNP activists and candidates are vilified by the media, they are hounded by the press and have hate and invective poured at them by every newspaper. Ad Hominem attacks on them replace serious journalism, and the issues are not debated in favour of a Marxist/Leninist ‘Terrorism of the word‘. The British State also directly targets the BNP opposition and our supporters and denies them the right to work for the state undertakes ‘inquiries and investigations’ in order to sack them from their jobs in the state institutions. The British state also arrests and imprisons BNP activists and leaders and then imprisons them for political crimes. Trade unions whose political funds sponsor the Labour Party, and who receive public money from the trade unions development fund run by the Labour government, refuse to represent BNP opposition members who are sacked from their jobs. Sinister figures working for the state security apparatus burgle the homes of BNP opposition members, taps their phones and monitor their e mails. Special Branch and MI5 collect files on known BNP activists. MI5 and Special Branch also infiltrate the BNP and seek to incite internal troubles within the party, whilst other state linked assets target, attack and torture members of the opposition. Torture ranges from actual physical torture to mental torture, such as that experienced by ex-BNP member Mike Newland to the treatment of Kevin Hughes in prison at the hands of black and Asian racist criminals.

The naked violence of the apartheid system is replaced in our politically correct society by a hidden violence, made all the more sinister and pervasive because it masked behind a pseudo-morality. The Labour government and its politicised minions within the institutions of the British state are waging a secret war against the white majority and the BNP. It is a truism that tyranny is often substantially aggravated when it dons the mantle of a moral cause and is hidden from public view. It is harder to fight and expose and enemy that refuses to reveal their true totalitarian nature.

The media do not expose the enemies of democracy nor the activities of the anti-democratic forces in Great Britain as the media are the primary power mechanism that sustains and empowers the anti-democratic elite. The media are the primary enemies of our national democracy. The entire media, from the right wing papers such as the Daily Mail and The Telegraph to the left wing papers such as the Guardian and The Independent, all attack the BNP. Not only do they attack us in their papers but the National Union of Journalists has a rule that all reporters who are members of the union must follow their national policy which is that no NUJ journalist may report the BNP in a positive manner in their papers. The papers all attack the BNP, they all campaign against the BNP during elections, they all order and condition people not to vote for us, they all publicise and promote those parties that stand against us in elections, they all print blatant lies about us and never give us the right of reply to their scurrilous allegations, they all seek to incite hatred against us, they print blatantly false stories about us, they offer free publicity and support for any parties and candidates standing against us and they harass and intimidate our activists and candidates both before, during and after elections. At the same time as we face this barrage of lies from the media that is designed to undermine our potential public support we are unable to deliver our campaign material during elections and the Police harass our leaflet teams on the street and arrest our activists. Then after an election the police target those people who sign our candidates nomination papers and harass them and intimidate them so as to try and ensure they do not nominate our candidates in future elections.

At every moment and in every way the State and its minions seek to strangle our national democracy at its very roots. In South Africa at least the ANC could get printers to print their party newspapers and publications for them. The BNP has to get its publications published outside the country due to past firebomb attacks on printers that have printed our papers and also because the trades unions have ordered their workers not to work in printers where BNP papers are printed. The Royal Mail will not deliver any BNP leaflets and campaign material during an election campaign due to a Trade Unions policy decision, and even though the Royal Mail allows all other political parties standing in an election to deliver their campaign material. Even though the duty to deliver the campaign material is enshrined in the Representation of the Peoples Act, the Royal Mail and the unions and Police ignore this law with utter impunity.

As we can see from the above analysis the similarities between the goals of the BNP and the ANC means liberals will have to reassess their attitude to the BNP and our cause if they are to have any intellectual credibility or moral cohesion. If they wish to condemn us and celebrate the ANC and Mandela, then they only way they can do that is if they are racists. What was noble for the ANC must also be noble for the BNP. It is also true that the liberals, and the labour party, are now operating in a way that explicitly resembles that of the supporters of apartheid.

We in the BNP stand for Representative Democracy not Minority Rule. We demand that Power is returned to the People. That is why we are attacked by those that support perpetual Minority Rule.

Our programme is for the Democratic Re-Nationalisation and the restoration of our national sovereignty that has been surrendered to all supra-national institutions by successive previous governments. We will work to ensure that the sovereign authority previous British governments have surrendered to supra-national institutions are immediately repatriated to the British Parliament. We will defend our land, our liberty and our laws from all betrayers both external and internal. Ours is a social, economic, political and cultural crusade. We are Revolutionary Constitutional Nationalists determined to defend and assert our constitutional rights and liberties against all those that threaten them and would surrender them. We intend to return power to the people and the nation, and restore our power and glory. All national powers surrendered to supra-national institutions will be repatriated back to Parliament and the British people alone acting as a democratic majority will finally control their own national, economic, cultural, political and social evolution and development. We too will one day overthrow Minority Rule and restore democracy to Britain.

The Tale of the Turtles

There are many people in this country, the Turtles as I like to call them, that live in their shells and hide their heads rather than face the reality of the country we live in. For them it is easier to live in the fantasy world of TV and watch Eastenders or Coronation Street than face the reality of the world they actually live in. For these people the only time they are willing to face reality is when the nightmares that happen to other people suddenly happen to them. It literally takes a brick through the window to get them off their sofas and away from the TV and a personal family tragedy to awaken them to the world.

What also doesnt help people face reality is when the Internet is cleansed of information and articles that contradict the illusions that our media and political masters like to portray as reality are removed from the worldwide web. This is the most insidious form of censorship ever imagined. As we all become more and more dependent upon the internet for our view of the world, the people that own the search engines that allow us access to the news on the internet are now able to define what reality is for us. Wikkipedia tell us what is true and Google defines what we can read. A whole series of news article concerning the comments of the ex-Met Police Chief Paul Condon in 1995 that 80 % of muggers in London were black have been removed from the internet - and this removal of the newspaper articles covers all the newspapers that covered the story in the UK.

It appears that the truth is always expendable and that the difference between reality and lies is nothing more than just the press of a delete button.

As the old saying goes ' A liberal is someone who hasnt been mugged yet - a racist is someone who has '.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_19950729/ai_n13997821

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_19950728/ai_n13997126

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_19950805/ai_n13999016

This is proof yet again of how the majority are manipulated, lied too and denied information to ensure that the interests of minorities are protected and that the masters of the Cult of Multi-Culturalism, the media and the puppet politicians they control, are able to keep control of the illusions they have created and the people they have deceived.

Here I will explain a what it means to be a second class White indigenous Briton so that even the Turtles may understand ;

In some distant foreign country where radical terrorists insurgents have been involved in a decades long terrorist campaign against the democratically elected government, a court offers a convicted terrorist a deal - either go to jail or leave the country. The terrorist then decides to leave the country where has been involved in bombings and murders and claim political asylum in Britain. The terrorist has many contacts in the UK as many of his fellow terrorists have already fled to Britain in the past and now use the UK as a base to organise their political and terrorist campaigns against the democratic government where they came from.

He arrives in Britain on a plane with his extended family. He walks through passport control and tells them that he is here to claim asylum. There are no checks done on whether he is a convicted terrorist before he is allowed to enter the country or whether he has been involved in bombings in the past in his own country. In fact , if he has been involved in political or religious terrorism in his own country before arriving in the UK then this would merely strengthen his claim for political asylum. He tears up his passport and enters the country.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/407415.stm

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/19/nterr119.xml

http://www.islam-watch.org/AdrianMorgan/UK_Threatens_US_Security.htm

http://prairiepundit.blogspot.com/2007/07/uk-giving-asylum-to-terrorist.html

He goes straight to one of the hundreds of lottery funded immigration advice centres and is given a case worker and a lawyer to help him claim a council house and benefits - and all this is legal aid funded ( whilst legal aid for British citizens is being cut back year after year the Legal Aid rules state that people living outside the UK are able to claim legal aid to sue the UK government ). In 2003/2004 legal aid costs for asylum seekers was £201 million pounds. The real costs, in relation to spending by non-public bodies funded by the lottery, is probably billions of pounds a year.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article2284317.ece

http://www.ramproject.org.uk/bulletins/bulletin.php?story=45288&latest_date=2003-11-03

http://www.biglotteryfund.org.uk/pr_210807_rc_yh_build_better_communities?regioncode=-y

http://www.biglotteryfund.org.uk/pr_190307_se_rc_funding_awards_life_after_50?regioncode=-se


The local council area he decides to settle in then has to give him and his family priority for a home. This is because he is considered to be more in 'need' than a local family who have been waiting on the housing list for years. If the council do not give them a home then they can be sued and legal aid will pay their costs.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6673911.stm

http://www.derbygripe.co.uk/house.htm

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=382276&in_page_id=1770&in_page_id=1770&ct=5&expand=true

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6654055.stm


The ex-terrorist then calls his friends in the UK based terrorist supporting front group who are subsidised by the local council and who run a community centre in the area. They decide to organise a demonstration to call for the removal of democracy in Britain and the death of British troops. Many of the demonstrators wear 'religious' face masks so the police cannot identify who is calling for the death of British citizens and Jews. The demonstrators also shout racist abuse at White people walking past the demonstration but because the Police are unable to speak the language nor understand the dialect of the demonstrators not one of the demonstrators is arrested for racial abuse of the White people that walk past. In London in the borough of Lambeth alone over 150 languages are spoken - this means that 149 different ethnic groups can racially abuse White people in the capital and never be arrested, because the Police only speak one language and arrest those who utter racial abuse in English. This is itself an example of direct discrimination against white english people as they are unprotected by the laws that cover racial hatred - this also means the figures on racial crimes in Lodon and the UK are meaningless as those laws are designed to trap only english speaking racists , and thereby allow racists that do not speak English to get away with their racism.

http://www.lambeth.gov.uk/AboutLambeth/

At the demonstration, which is guarded by hundreds of police officers all on overtime costing tens of thousands of pounds an hour, a White Englishman whose daughter is serving in the British army shouts out ' Get out of our country you terrorist supporting foreign bastards '. The police then arrest him under the Public Order Act 1986 for racism. Recent case law means calling them 'foreigners' means he can be convicted of racism - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/20/bloody_foreigners_racist/

The immigrant terrorist then decides that instead of claiming benefits he wants to get a job working in the Police. This is fine as though the Police ban the BNP from becoming police officers , ex-members of the IRA, members of the PLO, Hamas, ex-members of Al Qaeda, Hiz But Tahrir can all join.

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/farright/story/0,,2074511,00.html

http://www.asianimage.co.uk/mostpopular.var.1557530.mostcommented.police_on_course_to_learn_islamic_issues.php

He sends in his application form in to join the police and then is offered an interview whilst white applicants are rejected because they are white, the fact his English is bad is not a hinderance to joining the police as they will pay for help to learn English and then promote him to a representative of his community once has manages to learn the phrase ' Youre Nicked ' ;

http://www.personneltoday.com/Articles/2006/09/22/37337/rejected-white-police-applicant-wins-damages-in-race-discrimination.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/west_yorkshire/6906925.stm

http://www.personneltoday.com/Articles/2007/08/06/41844/environment-agency-in-positive-discrimination-row-over-training-programme-closed-to-white-english-pe.html

http://www.personneltoday.com/Articles/2007/06/22/41199/equal-opportunities-commission-to-check-london-mayor-ken-livingstones-decision-to-reject-london.html

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1288367,00.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/08/18/do1801.xml

http://www.numbers-uk.org/news.htm

He gets a job with the police but refuses to guard the Israeli embassy because he has religious 'issues' with Jews and Israel, and the police let him do this ;

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1887967,00.html

The police then discover that he has joined the police in order to help the terrorist groups he is linked with get access to police files, but the police dare not sack him for fear of being called racist by the Black Police Officers Association ( who have been investigated for fraud and corruption ) who are assting him in his case against the police for racism ;

http://news.monstersandcritics.com/uk/news/article_1297439.php/Home_Office_freezes_black_police_group_funding

http://www.adfero.co.uk/news/autocodes/countries/afghanistan/al-qaida-extremists-working-police-$1106849.htm

http://christianactionnetwork.wordpress.com/2007/07/09/uk-report-al-qaeda-infiltrating-police-and-public-sector-eight-al-qaeda-fanatics-working-for-the-police-but-they-dont-dare-sack-them/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=441746&in_page_id=1770&in_page_id=1770&expand=true

http://www.morrisinquiry.gov.uk/transcripts/2004-06-07-2-mbpa.htm


He then goes to a British Citzenship ceremony and is given a peice of paper which says ' You are now British ' - and the local police then use him as a poster boy for their diversity campaign and he sets about recruiting more terrorists he knows to join the Police. Within five years he is a senior police officer running the forces diversity unit.


There you have it - the 'success' story of how an immigrant becomes a British citizen.

Camerons Conservatives A Murdoch Media Puppet

Camerons Conservatives a Murdoch Media Puppet

As we all know it is not the British people who control our so called 'democracy', it is in fact the Media.

The media propagandise the political parties they want elected in their papers and then the mass of the public then vote for them. The role of the media in modern societies is to ensure that a Peoples Democracy NEVER arises, and to ensure that what controls our country is in fact the plutocrats and the corporations that own the papers and the politicians.

This is why we live in what I define as a Global Corporate Facist society - a society that like classic fascism is controlled by both corporations and government but that, unlike Classic Fascism, actually runs the country for the benefit of the corporations and the parasitic political class as opposed as running it for the benefit of the people.

This is the Blairite Third Way - a sick dog of a democracy where Fabians and globalists have created the worst of all possible worlds , a place where Political Correctness controls the Public Sphere and where Consumerism controls the Private Sphere.

The brainwashed puppets of the masses gutlessly surrender their liberties and rights to the dictats of Political Correctness and then surrender their individuality to the transient fashions and fads of Consumerism.

Tony Blair before the 1997 election flew to Australia to insert his tongue into the buttocks of Rupert Murdoch and then once elected into power with Murdochs help rewarded Murdoch with a whole raft of new laws that allowed him to buy media companies in the UK. Richard Desmond, owner of the Daily Express and pornographer in chief of the UK who is a particularly vile little peddler of filth, was allowed to buy the newspaper after promising to support Labour and attack the BNP.

Now it appears that Camerons Conservatives, that cabal of limp wristed public school popinjays and aristocratic mummys boys, are under the direct control of the media in the form of Andy Coulson, the ex-Editor of The News of The World, that well known newspaper for such serious journalism as devoting the majority of its pages to the sex lives of celebrities that no-one with an IQ above that of the ambient temperature within a closed fridge would be interested in.

There is nothing sadder than watching the cabal of public school bedwetters that comprise the senior ranks of the Tory Party adopting a tough populist stance.

Such poseurs are innately pathetic , for example Damon Albarn of Blur, the worlds most pathetic mockney who now calls himself a communist whilst living in his mansion on the proceeds of his royalities.

Albarn is one of the leading royals of the New Royalty of the 21st Century, formed from left wing rock stars like 'Two Castles and a Private Jet ' Bono, TV hosts like Jonathan ' my dog kennel costs more than your house ' Ross, comedians ( ! ) like Ben Elton - all of whom live lives of publically subsidised leisure, consumerism, conspicuous consumption and waste and who have now replaced the previous Royals as the parasitic class of consumerism as opposed to the parasitic class of Imperialism ( according to their own hypocritical analysis and standards ).

Just like the Bolshevik leaders took over and lived in the palaces of the tsar after the Russian Revolution, the communist rock and pop stars that once attacked the Royal Family and the aristocracy as degenerate priveliged spongers now live in the mansions and drive the Rolls Royces that were once owned by the aristocrats they despised - oh where is the Irony Gene in our society when it is required to deflate these idiots. Where once the Royals quaffed champagne and drove their Rolls Roycaes and went hunting, the New Royals inject smack, smoke crack, drive their Rolls Royces, fly their private jets and go on demonstrations against hunting. The New Royals have become the Old Royals.

King Billy Bragg , the clotted cream and jam scone revolutionary who lives in Devon off of his royalties whilst advocating urban ressurection in Essex and the inner cities of Britain, is the crowned prince of hypocrisy. Revolutionaries do not live in Devon - FACT.

Others in that class of overpaid and pampered morons in the New Royalty are people like Pete Doherty , or the Cat Torturer, as he is now known who is not content with just being a junkie twat but has now opened up a new career in creating a generation of crack addicted cats so he and his mates when drug upped can laugh at them whilst they are being tortured. Lets hope that the crack addicted kitten he tortured is sold a gun by a rival crack dealing gang of feral alley cats and doherty ends up being a statistic of Kitten Gang Gun Crime - what a dilemma that would be for the RSPCA.

And these are the role models celebrated in The Wankers Bible ( THE N.M.E) who are lauded for being role models for youth. This is a magazine that attacks the BNP as 'racists' yet at the same time fetes and celebrates junkie rock stars like Doherty who buy their crack cocaine and heroin from black dealers and turkish drug importers who terrorise and murder their own communities and who also are the cause of the gang wars that are devastating the black community and awho are also funding Islamic terrorism in the UK. The junkies syringe filled with smack pumps profits back into the coffers of the Taliban that are used to buy guns to kill British troops in Afghanistan or that funds Pakistani and Turkish crime gangs and Islamist terrorists in the UK, whilst cocaine funds Communist para-militaries and gangs in Colombia that murder thousands of ordinary people and devastate the rainforests and the Amazon where they plant and process the coca plants into cocaine.

The N.ME and its staff of drug addlled, coke sniffing bisexuals are the real racists as they celebrate the drug culture and white junkies in the music industry that fund the crime gangs and death dealers in the communities of indigenous peoples of the Amazon, Colombia, Turkey, Pakistan and Afghanistan.

For information on Mr. Coulson, one of the Media Vultures that feed on death, degeneracy and crime here ; http://politics.guardian.co.uk/conservatives/story/0,,2164680,00.html

For proof of how far the rot has gone this a report from the Guardian newspaper, that well know employer of communist spies during the Cold War and Islamist Jihadis and appeasers of terrorism during the present war against Terror ;

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/media/story/0,,2164931,00.html

Coulson: the tabloid man taking Cameron to the right·

Passage put into speech about broken society·

Tory leader 'sticking to modernisation strategy' Patrick Wintour,
political editorSaturday September 8, 2007

In the week Rhys Jones was shot, David Cameron had been ambivalent about being seen to be jumping on a bandwagon, and was due to press ahead with a speech on a new compact for the military to be delivered at Brize Norton.

At the last minute, under pressure from his director of communications, Andrew Coulson, it was agreed to insert a passage into his speech to RAF personnel on how the boy's death in a pub car park reflected the broken society of which the Conservatives had spoken.

It was followed by a series of time-consuming radio interviews driven by Coulson. The change of tack shows how Coulson, the former News of the World editor, is determined to push Cameron on to the news, and is less wary than other advisers of being seen to pursue a right-wing agenda. Within days Mr Cameron was speaking of anarchy in the UK, a phrase earlier used by the Sun.
Mr Cameron yesterday insisted he will not abandon his modernisation strategy, using a speech at his new party headquarters to assert it was perfectly consistent for a compassionate Tory to talk not only about crime and Europe, but also the environment and the future of the NHS.

It was prompted by a growing feeling in Tory circles that the arrival of Coulson as communications chief in June has led to a rightward drift in Mr Cameron's emphasis, both to shore up his dwindling support at the base of the party, but also to stem the alarming flow of votes to Gordon Brown.

Mr Coulson, the script runs, increased his influence by organising a rightward tinged fightback for Mr Cameron, and did this while Mr Cameron's modernising guru and close ally Steve Hilton spent a few weeks in Sardinia.

Ever since he returned from his own holiday there has indeed been a new toughness to Mr Cameron as he battled to prevent the polls going into meltdown. The party leader has been unafraid to speak out on crime and immigration, two touchstone issues for Tory rightwingers.

They have been visibly cheered and believe they can see Coulson's influence. Nick Wood, the former communications director for William Hague, sees Coulson in the ascendancy.

He wrote this week: "If Coulson has told Cameron one thing, I suggest it is this: without the enthusiastic backing of the Mail, Telegraph and Express and a fair wind from the Sun and the Times, the election is lost - and lost badly. To coin a phrase: there is no alternative."

Nick Wood is, to be frank, speaking utter bollocks.

There is an alternative to the Media Fascist State we live in - its called the BNP and when we get in power we will sweep away all the structures of the Global Corporate Fascist System and all its vile little crawling parasitic lackeys.

The Blighted Harvest.

The crisis in farming is also a crisis of British national security. The basis of Globalism and Consumerism is short termism. Consumer demand dictates both supply and production, and therefore what is not selling is not produced. In terms of T-shirts, socks, underarm deodorant and TV's this makes sense, but when applied to food production, national defence and energy production this is pure madness. We will always require electricity, an army to defend the country and food to feed the people. The defining feature of modern Britain is how economic fundamentalism has subverted our national sovereignty. The logic of the free market should never have been applied to the fundamental internal social structures in our country that are the basis of our national sovereignty, for in so doing we have allowed the corporate takeover of the nation state and surrendered our independence to the global market.

The UK trade deficit in foods is now ten billion pounds per annum. Self sufficiency in indigenous foods is less than 80 % and for all foods nears 60 %. Since the early 1990's the UK has lost 20 % of the agricultural production it requires to feed its own people. This is a scandal of the highest proportions. A nation that cannot feed its own people invites disaster.

There are in all national democracies what are defined as Red Zones - these are those structures and industries in our society that relate directly to our national security. The most important of these are energy production, national defence and agricultural production. I call these essential industries the ' Tanks, Tractors and Power Generators '. A nation that cannot feed its own people, that cannot keep the lights on and the railways running and that cannot train, equip and send out to fight and defend itself with its own independent army, navy and air force is not an independent nation. It is a puppet state of the corporations that control those essential industries.

Take for instance Dairy Framing as part of our national food production structures. The crisis in dairy farming over the last few decades has led to the collapse of British dairy farming as an industry. Cows and calves were worth almost nothing a few years ago and milk was costing more to produce than sell. Hundreds of dairy farms went into bankruptcy as supermarket profits soared as they sold cheap imported milk at the same time as demanding British farmers reduce their costs. Profits for the supermarkets were not passed onto the farmer and therefore the dairy industry could not compete. Family farms that had been in the same hands for generation were closed down and herds of cows that had been built up over generations were destroyed. In 1997 there were 34,242 registered dairy farmers and in 2002 the numbers had fallen to 25, 548. Since 1995 over 50 % of the dairy industry has collapsed. Each of these farms that closed represented a further erosion of our national independence, as the more the numbers of farms fell the more we as a nation depended upon foreign imports.

The dismantling of the Milk Marketing Board in 1994 meant the negotiating power of the farmers and milk processing plants were undermined at the same time as Globalisation opened up the UK milk industry to foreign completion and the big supermarkets began to act as a cartel and force down milk prices at the point of production. The small family farms were driven into collapse and free market economics, combined with a reduction in EU subsidies for UK produced milk, meant that only the big agri-business type farms were able to compete with foreign importers. This was at a time when the productivity and efficiency of dairy farmers was at an all time high. In the late 1980's the average yield were 5000 litres per cow, now it nearly 10,000 litres per cow. Thirty years ago it was 3500 litres per cow. Today three dairy farmers leave the business every day. There are now only 19,000 dairy farms left in the UK. Thousands more are expected to leave the industry in the next few years.

Then a few months ago in the middle of 2007 demand for milk in the global market began to increase due to changing dietary habits of consumers in countries such as China and India and this meant that imports into the UK of foreign produced milk began to rise in price. Yet the British dairy farms that could have profited from this rise in prices have gone, and Britain is now faced with importing milk at rising cost rather than producing its own milk for its home market. At the same time the rise in fuel, fertiliser and feed have added to the pressures on the existing dairy farms. Prices related to feed have risen by over 8 % and are expected to rise even more in the coming year due to increased global demand for fuel, fertiliser and feed. This is at the same time as Dairy Crest, who supply Sainsburys, has cut milk prices paid to farmers by 8 %.

This cut in the price paid to farmers from processors such as Dairy Crest is due to the big supermarkets refusing to pay more for milk in order to cover rising production costs of farmers, and therefore this means the supermarkets are now likely to drive the last of the UK dairy industry into bankruptcy and increase our national dependence on expensive foreign imported milk. Whilst the price of milk in shops has risen since by 20 % since 2002 to 53p a litre, up from 44p a litre, the price paid to farmers for their milk has fallen. In 1996 producers got 24.5p for their milk and today they get on average 18p per litre. Somehow the Dairy Framer is in the invidious position of seeing demand rise as production costs rise and sales cost remain static as supermarkets subsidise milk sales in their stores at a loss to themselves. This is the economics of the nut house, and will lead only to the complete destruction of the last of the remaining British dairy farms unless the government intervenes to stop the supermarkets and restricts foreign imports. The government will not do this though as the owners and directors of Tescos and Sainsburys are all supporters of the government. In a run up to an election a bankrupt political party does not alienate those who grease its wheels and therefore the government will abandon dairy industry.

The fact that British milk production is not able to compete with cheap foreign imports of milk is not an argument for the evisceration and extirpation of the British dairy industry. Rather it an argument for the creation of a national market for milk that excludes foreign imports that undercut British producers.

In relation to national defence economic short termism is not just madness, it is criminal. The fact that Britain now sold off much of its own national defence production capacity is an act of political treason. The first thing any Nationalist government must do when it takes power is undertake a strict programme of National Protectionism.
The following areas of concern must be addressed ;

The EU - Immediate withdrawal from it and the CAP

Globalisation - to be replaced by a form of National Economic Protectionism that puts the British farmer and the British consumers first.

Agri-Business - Only British agri-business are to be allowed to own British land and all of them are to be run only according to strict environmental laws ensuring that the small family farm is able to compete with the big producers. Foreign owned Agri-Business corporations to be bought by the government and the land leased to graduates of agricultural colleges. The era where agri-business caused B.S.E will end and the small farmer, the environment and the interests of the animals will come before corporate profits.

The government - a bonfire of legislation is required in order to protect the nation, citizens and the environment and restore our national powers and liberties

The Unions - to be banned from funding and supporting the Labour Party and political parties and banned from political campaigning in elections - only allowed to represent the interests of workers, not politicians and political parties - no union official to be paid more than the average wage of the members of that union

The media - to be banned from political campaigning and supporting or attacking individual political parties - also to be legally liable for telling lies in their publications or for publishing political propaganda - to be allowed to print and broadcast only the NEWS and not LIES. British produce and products only to advertised in papers.

The supermarkets - to be banned from selling products below cost price - to be forced to sell local farmers produce in their stores - to be banned from building any more out of town developments - to be forced to close out of town developments in areas where local shops are closing - to be forced to supply products at cost price to local shops so they can compete with the big supermarkets for price

Immigrant labour - to be banned. New schemes to be set up that encourage university / college students to work on the line during breaks - unemployed to be used at harvest times instead of immigrants labour and to be paid top up wages - prisoners to work on the land and undertake environmental reclamation and clean up projects - UK BASED NATIONAL SERVICE to be imposed for all 18 year olds before they go to university or after leave school - choice of working on the land, in hospitals or join one of the armed services to work in the UK and support civil society such as during the recent floods and assisting the armed services by undertaking work that full time soldiers have to do in this country. They will only work in the UK and not be sent abroad and will assist with UK based logistics for the armed services. Immigrant labour on farms undercut UK wages, therefore they will be prohibited from working in the country.

Public authorities not using local British produce - all schools, councils, hospitals etc to be forced to buy British produce from local farms

New colleges to train farmers - new universities to be built to train the future generations of British farmers required in order to build national self sufficiency

Land reform - the land owned by the Crown, Churches, foreign agri-businesses, investment groups, supermarkets and other large landowners that was once common land before the Enclosures Acts is to be taken back by the government and leased to graduates of new agricultural universities and also used to create local community farms.

Community Farms. We will create Community Farms where the workers share in the profits of the farms. We will reverse the Enclosures Acts and create new community farms where local people live and work on the farm and all share in profits. We intend to return our people to the land. We stand for the De-Industrialisation of agricultural production and the Re-Localisation of farming.

We should consider creating a National Farming Plan whose aim is national self sufficiency in agricultural production, within a decade. National food production is an aspect of National Security. Security for farmers is security for Britain. A crisis in the global food network could cause chaos in the UK. With the imminent arrival of Peak Oil and Peak Food then it is imperative that we begin work on creating a national self sufficiency plan as soon as possible.
The crisis of Globalism also relates to the import of foods infected with toxins and poisons, illegal Chinese GM crops, slaves in Brazil / child labour in India / African workers being forced to work on food plantations, Brazilian beef filled with growth hormones and Chinese products poisoned.
We also have Bio-Security problems due to Globalisation such as Foot and Mouth, Swine Fever and Bird Flu etc that are entering the country in foreign imports. Also bush meat and even human flesh are being sold in stores in London and this will be stamped out.

We also require Environmental Courts and an Environmental Police Force to be created in order to ensure that the NATIONAL FARMING PLAN operates and functions as we intend it too.

It is Tanks, Tractors and Power Generators that are the basis of national sovereignty. An independent national defence force , national food self sufficiency and national self sufficiency in energy production are the fundamental basis of an independent nation state. We demand total national self sufficiency and condemn individual self enrichment that damages the national interest and the national community.

Bring Back the Birch

Bring back the Birch.

The recent series of brutal murders of young people has revealed not only the moral vacuum at the heart of our society, but also the failure of the Liberal model of society itself. Whilst politicians like Dave ' The Fop ' Cameron has been adopting the shallow shibboleths of the liberal consensus and has been busy blaming poverty, rap music and lack of parenting as part of his critique on the break down of British society, the whole debate on the crisis has been marked by a failure to communicate what most people realise is the only solution.

Bring back the birch for anti-social bahaviour and restore the death penalty for illegal weapons importers and gangsters that use guns in their crimes.

Not one of the media commentators who have profited from the crisis by producing acres of asinine newsprint, have dared to defy the Liberal Consensus and demand a return to corporal and capital punishment.

The Liberal Consensus is the most pernicious ideology yet spawned by the Far Left. Unlike Communism and Socialism which never sought to mask their horrors and absurdities, the ideology of Liberalism has adopted a moral mask beneath which it hides as it poisons and destroys our society. It has been like an earthquake in slow motion that has torn apart the fabric of our society in such a way that the victims of it have been unable to recognise the damage it has been causing. Liberalism denies nature and seeks to replace it with sterile ideological illusions. It sees no bad in the criminal and instead blames society itself for preparing the crimes that the criminal commits. In the Liberal Consensus the individual criminal is never responsible for their own actions, instead it is always the fault of society, poverty, white racism, parents, rap music, Israel, the Jews or a myriad other factors. The criminal is seen as a cipher, a Tabula Rasa, upon which society inscribes its crimes.

The fact is that a society that is unable to excrete its most criminal elements is a society that will die slowly. The toxin of their presence contaminates and infects everything that they touch. Put them in prisons and we have to pay hundreds of thousands of pounds a year to take care of them, whilst at the same time hundreds of thousands of old people die of hypothermia and malnourishment in their own homes with no care or though by the government. The finite pot of wealth that society has to spend on itself to take care of the deserving and needy instead is spent on helping the criminal and the degenerate. Society spends billions of pounds a year on pathetic crime reduction programmes, youth offender schemes that take the criminals on holiday, on fighting the phantoms of institutional racism, on subsidising Islamic groups such as the council funded Muslim only gym in Leeds that gave the 7/7 bombers the money to subsidise their bomb factory. Instead of ensuring that public money goes only on the deserving and the needy, the Liberal Consensus seeks instead to socially engineer the criminals. Criminality is rewarded and the criminal bribed into being what the liberals want them to be. The idea that some people may be unredeemably evil and that society has a right and a duty to remove those elements from society, is an idea that must be repressed and denied according to the liberals. Whilst every form of degeneracy is celebrated, those that seek to discuss ideas and espouse values that the liberals reject are denied the oxygen of publicity and called extremists. The tolerance of liberals only extends to those who are as degenerate as they are.

The Liberal Consensus now dominates the entire media and political debate on crime and social breakdown. In a form of 'Paradigm Control ' the media excludes all those whose opinions and solutions differ from its own. It suffocates and represses all opinions and ideas that conflict with its own. Those who dare speak outside the confines of what the media defines as acceptable are attacked, villified and accused of being extremists - even when they reflect what the majority of the public want and think. The cabal of media jackals and their lickspittle leftists/ liberal lackeys that control the mechanisms of public opinion are guilty of creating the conditions within which criminals flourish. It is their propaganda that stops the public from voting for those they know would fix the problems. Those who say " the media are not so powerful that they can tell people what to think ", should ask themselves if that contention is true then why is it that the advertising agencies are paid billions per year to sell the products and goods that are advertised in the papers themselves. The fact is that the media who sustain consumerism through their advertising, at the same time control the political system through propagandising the political parties they support. It is the media, and the tiny cabal of media barons and liberal journalists who control those papers, who control how society sees itself.

The fact is that unless Britain escapes the domination of the Liberal Elite then our society can never begin the process of regeneration and healing. For a start we need to impose punishments on criminals and end the attempts to socially engineer them. Some things when broken cannot be fixed. The breakdown of society begins when ordinary people fear the criminals instead of the criminals fearing being caught and punished. In our present society the police are there to protect the criminals from their victims, not victims from the criminals. The police have become merely the para-military wing of the Liberal Elite, Neo-Bolshevik social workers in uniform enforcing the creedo of political correctness with the threat of arrest and imprisonment. I have been at a BNP demonstration against a planned mosque where a gang of black thugs turned up and threatened to shoot and kill us and the police, instead of arresting them, threatened to arrest us if we did not leave the area.The black gangsters and the police were all on first name terms and were swopping trendy ethnic handshakes with each other. The police and the criminals are now best of friends, as each has an interest in supporting the present farce as each benefits from it. More crime means more overtime and bigger police budgets whilst political correctness means less chance of going to jail and more cushy prisons with playstations and T.V's. The only victims in the Liberal Consensus is society and the victims themselves.
We require a return to a Punitive Society, one where the criminal is punished and the victim supported. We require the return of the birch for young offenders and the return of the cane in schools. It is fear of the punishment that prevents the criminal commiting crime. If young people were aware that attacking someone in the street because they are a Goth instead of a Chav means they will birched twenty times across their backs then they will think twice before they do so.
If young people were aware that spraying graffiti tags on walls would mean that they would be forced into the stocks of town centres on a saturday afternoon where shoppers could pelt them with rotten food for a few hours, then they would not commit the crime in the first place.
The courts should be issuing orders that would allow the police to enter an offenders home and remove their TV, DVD player, their jewellery, CDs, play stations and designer trainers and tracksuits and give them to their victims.
The courts should be able to issue orders that would allow the police to seize all the clothes and shoes of convicted criminals and force the local wife beater and thugs to wear a pink ballet tutu and pink wellies in their own streets during any periods of community service suich as sweeping the roads. That way the utter humiliation of being seen to look an idiot would serve to undermine their arrogance and also allow others to see just how pathetic they truly are.
The criminal in todays society has status for being a criminal. They are looked up too and regarded as local heroes. It is only by humiliating them and reducing their status in the perverted society we have created that crime will drop.
The criminal has to be humiliated and shamed in the eyes of their peers, that way their status as criminals is undermined and therefore the status attached to a criminal lifestyle is also undermined.
If young people saw the village thugs where they live forced to sweep the streets in pink tutus then the status of the criminal in that community would drop.
What most liberals do not understand about society is that the morality of the liberal is not the morality of the criminal. Criminals laugh behind the backs of liberals, they think liberals are the biggest bunch of insipid tossers that ever walked the earth. The criminals feed off of the vanity and stupidity of the liberals. They tell the liberals what they want to hear and then go and do what they want knowing that the liberal will always believe their bullshit and lies and will always act as an apologist for them as long as they say what the liberal wants to hear.
Liberals are the equivalent of the moron that sees a crocodile swimming in the river and says 'how beautiful ' whilst the crocodile is thinking ' here comes lunch '.
The only way to prevent the breakdown in society is to begin a crusade against the criminals and the status that criminals have in our society.
That process includes executing those criminals who are regarded as incurable dangers to our society and also those whose crimes are so heinous that society demands retribution.
Retribution in the case of people like Myra Hindley and Fred West can only come through harvesting their organs and giving them to people who are in need of organ donations. Those that take lives should be forced to save lives even if that means they have to die in order to atone for their crimes. Instead of spending millions of pounds to prolong the lives of murderers, the lives of murderers should be taken and used to ensure the lives of those who have done no wrong and who deserve life.
A whole new society must be built, a society that is determined to live and not slowly poison itself.
The Liberal Consensus is nothing more than an artefact of history, a festering remnant of failed 20th century history and leftist thinking.
The time has come for a new principle for society to guide itself with, one that puts the victims first and the criminals last.
Until that happens then all the bullshit and blather of the media, the liberal elite, the gutless establishment politicians and the cringing cowards that drift with the tide of media manufactured public opinion will change nothing and merely empower the criminal at the expense of us all.