The New Witch Burnings

From The Spectator, it appears that another heretic is being prepared for the bonfire.

Note how the vile reptile Pollard takes a valid critique of Tonge about the power of the Zionist Israel Lobby in the UK and US and then seeks to smear her by equating her points with "I'm surprised she hasn't referred to our drinking the blood of non-Jewish children. "

This is loathsome journalism, an attempt to smear and villify an opponent not on what they said, but on an implied aspersion with no basis.

This is the action of a vile, pathetic, venal and spiteful little man - another whelp of the Zionist Israel Cabal that has infiltrated and usurped our political and media systems.

Pollard himself like to make plain his Jewishness in hi articles primarily as he assumes that by emphasising his racial background then no-one who is non-Jewish will 'dare' challenge what he says on the basis that due to his Jewishness he is beyond reproach.

Not content with seeking to make a comparison between criticising Israel and the blood libel of Jews, this little rat Pollard has then sought to leave an impression in the minds of the reader that Tonge was implying this.

This is truly the politics of the gutter, and proof yet again of how The Spectator is simply a turgid rag for the propaganda of the Tories, Israel, UK Zionists and their lackeys.

I would use the spectator for its true purpose - but its paper is a bit too harsh on the bottom.


As for Powell and Tonge - Powell was removed by a homosexual being blackmailed by the Russians - Ted Heath - and Tonge was removed by a drunk who was being pressurised by media that was threatening to out him as an alcoholic.

In both cases their removal were to do with forces outside their parties.

In both cases they were correct, but telling the truth was not sufficient to protect them.

Powell had the support of the nation, Tonge had the support of a large section of the public - yet both were censored and sacked.

Powell has been proved correct in eveyrthing he said and Tonge will be proved correct in the future when historians look back at this period.

Until then the truth must be called a lie.



http://www.spectator.co.uk/stephenpollard/813491/tonge-rattling.thtml


Baroness Tonge of JewsRunTheWorld is at it again. She has already offered her Protocols of the Elders of Zion-like view that:

" The pro-Israeli lobby has got its grips on the Western world, its financial grips. I think they have probably got a certain grip on our party."


Last night in the Lords she offered this further thought:

" I am beginning to understand the power of the Israel lobby, active here as well as in the USA, with AIPAC, the Friends of Israel and the Board of Deputies. They take vindictive actions against people who oppose and criticise the lobby, getting them removed from positions that they hold and preventing them from speaking—even on unrelated subjects in my case. I understand their methods. I have many examples. They make constant accusations of anti-Semitism when no such sentiment exists to silence Israel’s critics. "


It's the usual trick of saying that "constant accusations of anti-Semitism when no such sentiment exists" is used as a tool to shut people up. Let me say for the nth time: it is perfectly possible to be critical of Israeli policies without being anti-semitic. Many Israelis oppose the government.

But just because it is possible doesn't mean that it's a given. In some cases, the language and the arguments which the speaker or writer puts forward show that they do indeed cross the line into antisemitism.

And what is loud and clear from Baroness Tonge's tongue is that she believes almost every one of the classic antisemitic tropes: "the pro-Israeli lobby" (you can safely assume she means Jews and their useful idiots) "has got its grips on the Western world, its financial grips"; and the Jews as a community have the power to punish and destroy their opponents. I'm surprised she hasn't referred to our drinking the blood of non-Jewish children.

It wasn't Jews who removed Baroness Tonge from her LibDem post; it was the then party leader, Charles Kennedy, because he rightly judged her words to be beyond the pale. Enoch Powell wasn't sacked by Heath after his Rivers of Blood Speech because the 'Black Lobby' forced him out but because Heath realised instantly that his views rendered him unfit for front bench duties. So too with Baroness Tonge.

Labour might have been beaten into fifth place by the BNP last week, but it's clear that the BNP has its own representative on the LibDem benches.

Sharia Law Gets Judges Approval

The first cuts are being sliced into our national democracy, and an alternative and alien legal system is being allowed to develop in our country which will replace British law - and one day lead to the basis of an Islamic state within our nation.

Here we see yet again the Judges leading the way in surrendering the British constitution to the Sharia law system - and when our judges are complict in the surrender of our legal system then both government and judges are accomplices to treason.

It is no wonder the government wants to abolish the treason laws - as they are planning treason.

Here we have a judge telling us that Sharia law is 'misunderstood' and that we are all fools for thinking it is a primitive system of Islamo-Fascism designed to subjugate Muslims beneath a veil of tyranny and non-believers forced into servile status under Dhimmitude and designed to create its own alternative state within our nation.

The final statement of the Judge here ; “It is possible in this country for those who are entering into a contractual agreement to agree that the agreement shall be governed by a law other than English law.”

Here we have the surrender of our nation to Sharia fanatics - and the Judges declaring that they intend to participate in the dismemberment of our nation.

It is no longer a question of IF, it is simply a matter of WHEN.





http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2008/07/03/lord-chief-justice-sharia-law-could-have-uk-role-91466-21224286/




Lord Chief Justice: Sharia Law could have UK role
Jul 3 2008 Media Wales

SHARIA law could play a role in some parts of the legal system, the most senior judge in England and Wales said today.

The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, emphatically ruled out the possibility of sharia courts sitting in this country or deciding penalties but explained comments made by the Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams.

But in a speech at the East London Muslim Centre in Whitechapel he said there was no reason why sharia principles could not be used in “mediation or other forms of alternative dispute resolution”.

Sharia – a set of principles governing the way that many Muslims believe one should live one’s life – suffered from “widespread misunderstanding” by the rest of the world, he added.

Lord Phillips said: “There is no reason why sharia principles, or any other religious code, should not be the basis for mediation or other forms of alternative dispute resolution.

“It must be recognised, however, that any sanctions for a failure to comply with the agreed terms of mediation would be drawn from the laws of England and Wales.”

The Lord Chief Justice told his audience that severe physical punishments such as flogging, stoning and the cutting off of hands would not be acceptable.

He added: “There can be no question of such courts sitting in this country, or such sanctions being applied here.

“So far as the law is concerned, those who live in this country are governed by English and Welsh law and subject to the jurisdiction of the English and Welsh courts.”

The judge said the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, had been misunderstood when it was reported in February that he said British Muslims could be governed by sharia law.

Dr Williams suggested that sharia could play a role in “aspects of marital law, the regulation of financial transactions and authorised structures of mediation and conflict resolution”.

The Lord Chief Justice said today: “It was not very radical to advocate embracing sharia law in the context of family disputes, for example, and our system already goes a long way towards accommodating the Archbishop’s suggestion.

“It is possible in this country for those who are entering into a contractual agreement to agree that the agreement shall be governed by a law other than English law.”

Israel - A Statement

The main problem with blogging is that idiots working to their own agenda, as demonstrated by Melanie Phillips, are able to remove snippets of an article and then distort them in such a way as to radically alter their real meaning.

For example, a few years ago I wrote an article where I stated that I supported the right of Israel to defend itself against Islamist aggression both within its own borders and outside its borders.

As a NATIONALIST, then purely on a logical basis related to the principles of nationalism, I have to support the right of ALL nations to defend their own internal and external security as they wish. This of course includes Israel, as Israel is a nation.

In fact the war that Israel is fighting against Islamic Extremism is a war that we may one day have to fight on our streets. The first shots in that war were fired on 7/7.

This is why we support the right of Israel to defeat its own inner enemy, as we fear that one day the enemy in Tel Aviv will be a part of the same army on the streets of London.

To re-state my position here again for the benefit of those who have been lured to my blog site by the article of Melanie Phillips ;

1) We support the right of Israel to exist as a nation state

2) We support the right of all nations, including Israel, to defend their national security both internaly and externaly as they wish without outside agencies such as the UN, EU or US interfering. We also believe that Iran should be able to develop its own national security programme in its own interests without outside interference. Iran is an independent nation, and such its internal security interests are not our concern UNLESS THEY DIRECTLY THREATEN US AND OUR NATIONAL SECURITY INTERESTS.

At the moment Iran has not become an active threat to us.

This is why we adopt a principle of 'KEEP BRITAIN OUT OF FOREIGN WARS AND FOREIGN WARS OUT OF BRITAIN'.

3) At the same time we respect the right of the Palestinian people to resist peacefully the removal of their lands and rights by the Zionists extremists that control the Israeli state. As the BNP is an Indigenous rights party fighting for the rights of the indigenous British people in the hostile multi-cultural system, we respect all those indigenous rights movements that seek to secure for themselves their ancestral land and cultures.


4) We resist Islamist extremism and Sharia Law in the UK as it threatens our national security. We wish to limit Muslim immigration into the UK as it threatens the demographic power of the British people, in that we will be a minority in our own homeland by 2050.

At the same time we resist the power of the Zionist Network in the UK as it supports the political parties and ideologies that have led to the social breakdown of our society. Whilst the Zionists in Israel celebrate their ethno-nationalist state, the Zionists in the UK who work for Israels interests attack us on the basis that we wish to construct a similar ethno-nationalist state.

This pure hypocrisy at its most sickening. Their constant calling us 'racists' is both hypocritical and sickening, seeing as they have the media to bark their lies at the public for them.

The Zionists in the UK, such as Phillips, also lie to their own people and seek to perpetuate a mythical threat from the BNP to the British Jewish community. In fact the CST reports on anti-semitism in the UK all confirm that the two main threats to the British Jewish community in the UK are from ;

1) The Far Left - such as the Socialist Workers Party and Respect Party

2) Muslim extremists.

The reason why Phillips in her attack on me deceived her readers and asserted that the BNP is a threat to the Jewish community, is simply because she wishes to keep the British Jewish community under the control of the same corrupt Zionist front groups and Irael subservient political parties that have been misleading and exploting them for decades.

The only political party that can represent and defend the interests of the British Jewish community is the BNP - simply because we are both hated by the same enemies and because we both are loyal to this country.

The Board of Deputies of British Jews, the CST, Searchlight, Melanie Phillips and the rest of the Zionist cabal that currently controls the so called organisations that represent British Jewry all in reality work for the interests of Israel.

Those ordinary, patriotic and loyal British Jews such as the ones who are serving in the British army and who are under attack from Muslim extremists and far left activists, are the people only we in the BNP can defend.

The Zionists supported the mass immigration of Muslims into the UK.

The Zionists supported the Iraq War that led to a rise in attacks on British Jews by Muslims and Far Left activists.

The Zionists want a war with Iran that will trigger a massive rise in race attacks against Jewsin the UK by Muslim extremists and far left activists.

The Zionists support Israel more than they support the UK - that is treason when they serve the interests of a foreign nation above their own.

The Zionists have betrayed their own community for decades - the fact you, and we, all walk in fear in our own communities is down to them and the parties they supported and the policies they have enacted.

The BNP has never passed a SINGLE law in this country as we have not been in power - the state of our nation has been created by the lackeys in the mianstream parties that worked with the Zionists.

Phillips is a creature of vile deceits, and one who has long abandoned any principles for her own agenda.

Melanie Phillips and The Spectator

A few years ago the BBC sent an undercover reporter into the ranks of the BNP in order to try and set up Nick Griffin and Mark Collett and drag them through a David Blunkett Stalinist show trial.

Last year the Dispatches programme sent undercover reporters into British mosques to record and film extremist Imams giving inflammatory speeches.

It appears that every section of British society is apt to be investigated, but it appears that those in Britain who dare investigate the power of the Jewish community in Hollywood triggers the wrath of the self appointed Zionist attack dogs of the Israeli Zionist Network in Britain.

After I wrote an article about the disproportionate power of the Jewish community in Hollywood I was first contacted by the Jewish Chronicle reporter Dana Gloger.

I gave her an interview, which has been covered in the articles here ;

http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2008/06/harsh-facts.html

http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2008/06/jewish-chronicle-interview.html

http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2008/06/burn-down-hollywood.html


The story was not published in the Jewish Chroncile though. I rang Dana and asked her why not, and she said that an e mail would be forthcoming to reveal why she had not run the story.

The mail did not turn up.

The next thing that happens is that Lancaster Unity, a pro-Zionist website posing as a 'pro-working class website' run by the lesbian Conservative and Zionist activist Denise Garside, and a cabal of self proffessed Jewish activists, runs an attack article on me.

Excellent methinks, the old Technorati rankings will go up again - and then blow me, up pops Melanie Phillips quoting large chunks of my writings in an article in The Spectator and calling me anti-semite.

FANTASTIC !

Poor old melanie, in her fugue of Zionist moral outrage though she has not noticed that this is MY BLOG, not a BNP blog.

Unlike the Lib, Lab, Con cabal of lickspittles to Politically Correct self censorship, the BNP tolerates a wide range of opinions in its membership.

We are even allowed to think for ourselves !

We are even allowed to have our own blogs !

Neither does the BNP demand its members censor themselves or cease to hold personal opinions.

In fact the BNP encourage a diversity of opinions within its ranks in order to guarantee as wide a pool of talent and ideas as possible.

The fact that we can beat the Labour Party in the recent Henley elections when the BNP is run on a miniscule budget that wouldnt cover the Labour Party bar bill in Parliament or the Tory House of Lords prostitutes and bottom spanking rent boy bills, shows how talent can defeat profligate incomptence.

It appears that the BNP has to be attacked by Melanie Phillips as we are beating the Labour Party in elections.

Funny that - and there was I thinking the Daily Mail and The Spectator were Tory supporting papers.

When the Tories attack political parties that are taking votes away from Labour - then you know something rotten stinks in British politics.

The Establishment must be frightened.

Phillips, and the other self appointed leaders of the Jewish community in Britain are afraid of the BNP for one thing, as they know that the British Jewish community are now realising that their future communal safety depends on the BNP coming to power and removing the same threats that threaten us all.

That means the British Jewish community have to shed themselves of the idiot leaders that have betrayed their community over the last fifty years with their support for the labour party, liberal party, tory party and the liberal consensus - as these leaders are the supporters of the people and parties who have almost destroyed Britain over the last fifty years.

To be called an 'anti-semite' By the Daily Mail writer and Zionist propagandist Melanie Phillips, is the ultimate case of the pot calling the kettle black considering her attacks on the Palestinian people.

I find it rather strange to be labelled an anti-semite by Phillips, as it now appears I am now ranked alongside such institutions and people also labelled as anti-semites by Phillips in her tirade filled career so far, as ;

1) The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. Rowan Williams

2) The ENTIRE Anglican church including both clergy and congregations

3) The ENTIRE Catholic Church including everyone from God down encompassing the Pope to the worshippers

In a recent article, she criticised the membership and leadership of the Anglican and Roman Catholic churches in Britain, and specifically the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. Rowan Williams, accusing them of antisemitism because of remarks made by the Archbishop about the plight of Bethlehem Christians under Israeli occupation; another factor was an opinion poll showing that the majority of Anglicans were opposed to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank. The article ended with a condemnation of what she sees as the churches' failure to criticise the President of Iran's desire to "destroy Israel", and that "the churches in Britain are not only silent about the genocidal ravings emanating from Iran but are themselves helping pave the way for a second Holocaust".


Blimey - I never knew I was so important. Cheers for heads up Melanie, I am flattered you appear to read my blog and writings.

Phillips cannot be taken seriously though as she also repudiates the theory of evolution.

To Phillips the Old Testament, and the irrational actions of the insane genocidal 'god' within its blood soaked pages, make more sense than a rational scientific explanation for the basis of life on Earth.

Anyone who takes the Old Testament seriously (or any of those other religious books with their genocidal dieties who spent most of pre-history mightily smiting peoples and tribes they had taken umbrage upon ) in relation to evolution cannot themselves be taken seriously.

Therefore being called an anti-semite by a Creationist like Phillips is a bit like being called a racist in Klingon by a Star Trek fan angry that Klingon Culture is not being taught in schools.

You have to draw a line between loony and maverick somewhere, and I suspect Melanie may now be on the side of the barking ones.

It also appears that Phillips herself has a rather unique definition of anti-semitism based on a Melaniecentric principle.

In her case an anti-semite is anyone who dares disagrees with her or anyone who dares criticise Israel.

She is the Zionist Rottweiler of the British media, a rabid snarling attack dog for her masters in the Zionist Fatherland.

Apart from Muslims who get a regular mauling from her foam flecked maw and anyone that dares criticise Israel and anyone who dares disagree with her, her special venom is reserved for her fellow Jews who do not prostrate themselves before the Golden Calf of Israel and praise the Israeli Race State.

Read about her nasty and spiteful little attacks on Johann Hari here ;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanie_Phillips

Being called an antisemite by Phillips though is very perverse, seeing as she says the Palestinians are an "artificial" people who can be collectively punished for acts of terrorism by Islamist terrorists because they are "a terrorist population". She believes that while "individual Palestinians may deserve compassion, their cause amounts to Holocaust denial as a national project".

Perhaps Phillips has forgotten that Palestinians are semites too.

She is so busy hurling the fire brand of anti-semitism at people, that she has not realised that her own sublimated anti-semitism drives her to seeing anti-semites everwhere - except of course in the face of the real anti-semite that looks back at her every time she looks into the mirror.

Melanie Phillips is part of the Israel-UK Neo-Conservative network, which is mirrored in the United States by the AIPAC lobby group. Like many of the Neo-Conservatives in the US, she first embraced the ideology of Trotskyism and was a supporter and propagandist of the far left.

Her journey from leftist to Zionist is a case study in how racial identity triumphs over national loyalty. The two dynamics that drive Phillips right wing politics is her Jewish identity and her loyalty to the Jewish homeland of Israel.

She is the unofficial spokesman for the Likud Party in the British media and acts as an propagandist for a foreign power. Through her uncritical defence of Israel she has assumed the role of the mainstream voice of the Zionist settlers on stolen Palestinian land, the spokeswoman for the illegal Zionist settlements themselves and an apologist for the Zionist organisers of the expulsion of the Palestinians.

Her defence of British values is predicated on the basis that those British values must be subservient to Israel. Any British values that seek to assert values that are at odds with the interests of Israel are defined as 'fascist'.

Yet Phillips in her article attacking me did not mention the new law passing through the Knesset in Israel, the Prevention of Infiltration Act, which criminalises asylum seekers with 4 years in prison and 7 years for those who claim asylum from Arab nations.

It appears that Israeli government Fascism is not newsworthy, but my article exposing the racism of Hollywood was.

I never realised that Hollywood must never be investigated or critiqued, that its internal power structures and personalities must never be exposed or researched.

Makes you wonder what they are hiding doesnt it, when the Zionist attack dog Phillips is sent out to bark her bile in the pages of The Spectator.

What has Phillips to do with Hollywood ? Nothing as far as I can see.

So it appears that the issue for her attack on me in the Spectator must be the 'heresy' of mentioning the power of the Jewish community in Hollywood.

A similar 'heresy' is the mention of the power of the Israel Lobby in the UK and US government,(HAS ANYONE SEEN JENNY TONGE AND TAM DALYELL SINCE THEY CRITICISED ISRAEL AND SPOKE ABOUT THE POWER OF ISRAEL IN Uk POLITICS - it appears that anyone who dares say something the UK Zionists dont like is sent out into the social and political wilderness), any such mention and Phillips attacks.

I find it quite sinister that the Jewish Chronicle, Lancaster Unity and Melanie Phillips - each of them Zionists - seem to be an organised network that seek to suffocate democratic debate and investigation on issues relating to Israel and the Jewish communities around the world.

Such connections and actions merely reinforce the belief that an international Zionist network exists that actively promotes the interests of Israel in individual nation states by targeting anyone in those ntions that dare debate issues that Israel and Zionists do not want to see raised in public.

Phillips was born into a Jewish family and educated at Putney High School, a girls' independent school in Putney, London, and later read English at St Anne's College, Oxford, before training as a journalist on the Evening Echo.

After a short period at the New Society magazine, she joined The Guardian newspaper in 1977 and soon became its social services correspondent and social policy leader writer.

This was during the era of the Soviet Union and the Communist Gulags when dissidents, nationalists and democrats were being exterminated in their millions, by the 'socialists' in the Soviet Union whilst she was busy working for a socialist newspaper espousing radical socialist views.

After a stint as the Guardian's news editor, she started writing her own opinion column in 1987. As a writer for The Guardian in 1982 she defended the Labour Party at the time of the split with the Social Democratic Party.

Leaving The Guardian, Phillips first took her opinion column to the Guardian sister-paper The Observer, and then to the Sunday Times, before starting to write regularly for the Daily Mail in 2001. She also occasionally writes for the Jewish Chronicle and other periodicals.


Melanie Phillips is often a good writer, but she cannot evade her complicty in the crimes she condemns.

The primary mechanism in British society that has brought about the downfall of our nation is the media. The Daily Mail and Melanie Phillips are both agents in this process.

Phillips though is primarily just another puppet of Israel in the British media, and her agenda is to ensure it is 'business as usual' for the Zionists and Israel by promoting the Tory Party to the British public - simply because, as William Hague declared a few days ago, the Tories are a party that seeks Israeli support and Jewish donations.

http://www.thejc.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m11s18&SecId=18&AId=60925&ATypeId=1

Just as the reliance of the Labour Party on donations from Jewish business leaders greased the path from sanctions to war in relation to Iraq, Phillips is now seeking to grease the path to power for the Conservative Party.

The Spectator is a Tory propaganda magazine, staffed by Tory supporting puppets and Israeli stooges.

To be attacked by The Spectator is almost as satisfying as being attacked by The Daily Mirror - as self validation is always dependent upon who we are attacked by. Our enemies define us as much as our friends.

To be attacked by the Zionist Phillips in the reactionary Zionist lapdog Tory press is high praise indeed.

Thank you for contempt, it is confirmation that all my writings have not been in vain.

Her real fear is this though ; The Jewish community in Britain have woken up to fact that the leaders they have placed their trust in for the last fifty years have been using them.

Instead of promoting the interests of integrated Jews in the UK who are loyal to Britain, the lackeys of Zionism like Melanie Phillips, the Jewish Chronicle and Lancaster Unity, BOD and the CST have been serving the interests of Israel and Zionism.

Hollywood is another aspect of this Zionist betrayal of the British Jewish community. The degenerate values and film promoted by Hollywood have glamorised a liberal consensus that has poisoned not just America but British society and Western Civilisation.

The torture porn, violence and degeneracy peddled in Hollywood movies have poisoned all our cultures and countries. Amy Winehouse and Pete Doherty are the British Jewish victims of Hollywood, the drug addled scions of British Jewry who are afflicted with the same toxic cultural values promoted and promulgated by Hollywoods poisonous effluxions as our community is suffering from.

All our communities have suffered equally as a result of the power of Hollywood, and each of must start to resist its poison.

The self appointed elite of the British Jewish Community have betrayed their own people.

This is nothing unusual though - the indigenous British people have also been betrayed by their own people for decades. It was indigenous British politicians that passed the laws that created this tragic, dysfunctional Britsh society and it was primarily the indigenous British people who voted for the idiots.

We have been betrayed as much as you have been betrayed.

The traitor elites though are now deeply afraid. They know that all the communities in Britain are beginiing to realise that they have been betrayed by the people who have supposedly running things in their name for decades.

They are looking for people who will tell them truth and who will fix the problems.

The British people know that listening to the same liars who created this crisis when they say 'Vote for us and we will change things' is the action of idiots.

The British Jewish community have been placed in danger by mass immigration, surrender to Sharia Law, political correctness, the Tory government that refused to act against the Muslim extremists that burnt the Satanic Verses in public and who allowed Islamist terrorists to claim asylum in the UK during the 1980's and by a Labour government that has allowed our borders to be opened to Islamic immigration to the point where Muslims will be the religious majority in our nation by 2050.

All these events were supported by the leaders of the British Jewish Community, as they were too busy working for the interests of Israel.

We have all been run by the traitors in our respective communities, and now the time has come to rise up together and demand our country back.

Mexico 1991 UFO's and the Shadow Government

Another member of the armed forces reports seeing a UFO.

The official UFO US army identification chart above now has to be revised.

The time has come now for a full investigation. The famous 1991 Mexico sightings during the eclipse proved that these objects existed, yet no-one has bothered to investigate what these objects are.

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/ufo-files-mexicos-roswell-1991-eclipse-sighting/3445870638

http://www.rense.com/ufo5/ovni.htm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/392451.stm

The fact that these objects have been proved to exist, and not just be swamp gas or chinese lanterns, requires an investigation into just what these objects are - whether they are weapons of some enemy nation penetrating our air space, drone aircraft which could be used by terrorists to attack ground locations or secret government weapons being tested.

These objects exist - the question should then be being asked - wat are they ?

Because these objects could be weapons, or used as weapons by terrorists or rogue states, then it is imperative that they be investigated and their agenda discerned.

A failure to investigate such objects is a clear breach of the duty of the government towards it citizens.

Whilst we invade Iraq to remove non-existent WMD's, we refuse to investigate objects seen by police and army pesonnel, that are caught on film and caught on radar, that are seen hovering near army bases (and could thereby be filming them) and that have been recorded damaging military aircraft is an act of either utter folly or planned decpetion.

I think the solution is the latter - in that the government knows these objects exist, that they are undertaking an agenda we have no idea of and that their existence raises real National Security issues that are so sensitive that they have to be surpressed.

For the American Military Industrial Block and the US Shadow Government to admit that the trillions spent on miliary defence are wasted as these objects are able to penetrate our air space at will, interfere with our weapon systems at will (as at Rendlesham Forest when the nuclear weapons were de-activiated) and that our weapons systems are useless against these objects would be to undermine the whole concept of having a Military Industrial Block.










;

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/ufos/article1361570.ece

ROYAL Navy aircraft engineer told yesterday of the moment he saw a UFO spinning above the M5 motorway.

Michael Madden, 25, watched in disbelief as it hovered, then disappeared at “incredible speed”.

He said the flying disc flew for up to three minutes above junction 21, near Weston-super-Mare, Somerset.

Michael was returning to Yeovilton base from Manchester with workmate Michael Casson, 22, at 9.50pm on Sunday.

The engineer said: “I work with aircraft and grew up next to Manchester Airport so I know exactly what a plane looks and sounds like.

“This was definitely not a plane.

“It was a circular disc which was glowing bright, hovering hundreds of metres up.

“Other people must have spotted it.

“It was unlike anything I’ve ever seen in my life.

“It really did look like alien aircraft in the films.

“It had an antenna fixed to the back.”

For our Forefathers

They shall not grow old as we who are left grow old.
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning,
WE WILL REMEMBER THEM.



'FOR YOUR TOMORROW WE GAVE OUR TODAY'

The Battle of the Somme, also known as the Somme Offensive, fought from July to November 1916, was among the largest battles of the First World War. With more than 1.5 million casualties, it is also one of the bloodiest military operations recorded. The Allied forces attempted to break through the German lines along a 12-mile (19 km) front north and south of the River Somme in northern France. One purpose of the battle was to draw German forces away from the Battle of Verdun; however, by its end the losses on the Somme had exceeded those at Verdun. By the end of the war the Allied losses proved replaceable, the German losses less so.

Verdun was an icon that would affect the national consciousness of France for generations, and the Somme would have the same effect on generations of Britons. The battle is best remembered for its first day, 1 July 1916, on which the British suffered 57,470 casualties, including 19,240 dead—the bloodiest day in the history of the British Army.

Oil to be $500 A Barrel

The black beast of Peak Oil slouches ever closer, its womb squirming with a myriad monsters about to be born.

Drunk on its delusions and decadence, the West sleeps as the shadow of the monster already begins to darken the day.

Consumerism, the offspring of the Oil Era is facing the abyss.

Globalism, and the liberal consensus based on the theory of universal human rights, will fall with the Oil Era.

The Natural Order will replace the New World Order, and an age red in tooth and claw will erupt as nations struggle to secure the last remaining oil reserves in the last few remaining oil wells.

This will be an era of Eco-Conflict, Resource Wars, Oil Wars such as the Iraq War and Neo-Darwinian Politics.



Here is a video of the energy expert Dr. Robert Hirsch explaining how oil will be $500 a bareel by 2012.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=774744570


With the collapse of the dollar as a result of the collapse of the Petro-Dollar Recycling System, energy inflation costs, growing political, terrorist and social instability in the last remaining oil producing nations and rising oil prices globally mean that this projection of $500 is a likely scenario.

The Great Depression ended because economic growth was still possible due to the vast amounts of oil still available.


We are now in The Second Great Depression with the oil almost half gone. Therefore the possibility of cheap oil subsidising future economic growth is gone, and all the remaining oil can do is satisfy existing demand at an ever diminishing rate and ever rising cost.

The Second Great Depression was prefigured by the Credit Crunch, which was itself an aspect of the collapse of the Oil Age.

Credit expansion and rising incomes in the 20th century were aspects of an economic expansion generated by cheap oil, but with the collapse of the Oil Age which began with the Iraq War (which was undertaken to secure the last remaining globaly significant oil deposits) then future economic expansion was not possible, and therefore the expansion of the credit based system was impossible. This caused the credit based system to collapse.

Previously easy credit has been available to everyone, simply because as long as the cheap oil remained then an increase in the growth of the economy was guaranteed. Credit could be repaid. The credit crunch caused by losses caused by the Sub Prime Crisis and the linked withdrawal of credit by loaners of private liquidity, who are now holding onto their capital, has caused the credit supply system to crash.

Governments cannot pump vast amounts of liquidity into the economic system in order to boost economic growth as Public Debt is escalating due to the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars.

So Public Liquidity and Private Liquidity are both restricted at the same time as the ability of those already in debt to pay back existing credit loans is diminished due to economic reccession as a result of the oil price rise.

This is a triple whammy.

With oil supplies diminishing then the end of the Capitalist system is in sight.

Both Marx and Smith misuderstood the fundamental dynamic of all modern economic systems, which is energy supply.

Capital is an aspect of the energy capture and supply process.

Agricultural production in early human societies allowed man to grow crops containing calories, energy, to feed himself and his family.

Previous to this development of agriculture then human calorific intake had been based on nomadic hunter gatherer lifestyles based on subsistence living.

Then as agricultural techniques improved, the excess calories produced by the farmers allowed the creation of a warrior elite whose sole roles in early agricultural societies was to protect the farmers and to hunt down, capture, keep and feed slaves.

The slaves were the first machines dependent on mans ability to unlock energy from the environment.

Then the slaves became workers in the Feudal System. They worked the land and produced the food and goods that formed the basis of feudal trade.

Then the development of new technologies during the Industrial Revolution using wood, coal and charcoal allowed massive economic growth.

The Feudal Workers became the Working Class who worked in the mines, fields and factories and who supplied the machines with energy, who worked the machines or who sold the products of the machine or who protected the capital hoarded by the owners of the machines.

The demand for workers to work the machines drove up incomes and with disposable incomes this drove up the demand for commodities produced by the machines.

The discovery of oil, and the creation of technologies that used oil, caused massive economic and population growth.

Growing populations in growing economies with rising incomes are all aspects of the energy supply process.

The Oil Age replaced the coal age, but the Nuclear Age has not, and cannot, replace the Oil Age.

Therefore the end of the Oil Age is the end of modern human civilisation.

The Olduvai theory posits a return to the population levels by a devastating collapse in human opulation numbers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olduvai_theory

The Time of Malthus will have begun, for it had only been delayed by the age of oil and the fertilisers and pesticides created from oil.

Both Communism and Nazism were aspects of the energy capture process. Both represented the return to Slave Economies, and both Communism and Nazism were destroyed by oil.

The Nazis invaded the Soviet Union to get at the oil owned by Russia (leading to the defeat of Germany due to its war on two fronts ) and the Soviet Union collapsed because of Oil.

The Soviet Union experienced peak oil first hand—a 43% decline in domestic oil production between 1987 and 1996. This crisis caused Soviet society to fall into devastating economic impoverishment. The oil decline in the Soviet Union preceded the GDP decline.

Thatcherism was simply the expansion of credit and the British economy due to the oil boom of North Sea Oil.

There are NO economic miracles - there is simply lots of oil or expensive oil.

The need to ensure energy supplies to maintain existing social complexity and to fuel future economic growth is the basis of all economic and social systems.

When the energy source that any civilisation depends upon no longer provides enough energy to sustain its existing social complexity and future economic growth, then that society will collapse.

The only option for any nation or civilisation in such an energy crisis is to either collapse or embark upon wars to secure energy supplies.

THAT IS THE FUNDAMENTAL BASIS OF ALL HUMAN SOCIETIES.

It is the one true law of the Natural Order to come.



http://www.energybulletin.net/node/19837