Cops Give Up Arresting Criminals - play dress up instead

What next - days where they play dress up and sell pegs ay gypsies door to door, days spent dressing up as Satanists AND slaying goats, days spent as nudists strolling around the town in the nude.

HOW ABOUT CATCHING CRIMINALS YOU POLITICALLY CORRECT MORONS !


http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/Police-suffer-dressingdown-over-diversity.5520326.jp


Published Date: 04 August 2009

A POLICING initiative in which three officers spent a day in Sheffield city centre in full Muslim dress to improve community understanding has been slammed as a 'politically correct gimmick.'

Two sergeants and a community support officer took to the streets wearing jilbabs and niqabs - Islamic outfits which leave just the face exposed - in an exercise called In Your Shoes Day.

But the project, to help officers understand better the iss
ADVERTISEMENT
ues facing Muslim women, has been criticised as a waste of money, detracting from real police issues.

Matthew Elliott, of the Taxpayers' Alliance, said: "This is an absurd diversion from real policing. People want the police out catching criminals, not indulging in politically correct gimmicks. The police are overstretched as it is without officers being paid to do other things than their real job."

Douglas Murray, director of the Centre for Social Cohesion, said: "This has nothing to do with crime.

"Like most people who have been a victim of crime, I am amazed and flabbergasted that they have solved all the crimes so they can spend a day playing dressing-up games. This is a fantastic demonstration that for the last 10 years the British police have been having an institutional nervous breakdown.

"They do not know what their job or role is."

South Yorkshire Police said it was the first in a series of activities to "celebrate diversity."

Charlie Brooker - The Movie

Over in The Guardian, the Ford Cortina of British newspapers (a clunker that is a waste of money loved only by its hobbyist owners and is a total money pit) carries an article by Charile Brooker.

Chariles gives us three ideas for three new Hollywood movies.

But Charlie is in fact the man we want to see in the movies.

Here are three ideas for Charile Brooker films ;

1) Charlie Brooker as Harry Corbett in a remake of Carry On Frankenstein.

Charlie has to battle with a genetically engineered monster whose DNA is a mixture of Ann Widecome and the Honey Monster.

Kenneth Williams is played by Graham Norton and Jim Dale by that American wooly woofter in Torchwood who is obviously shagging some top BBC producer as he gets parts in new BBC TV shows every other week.

His next role is as the dog in One Man and His Dog.

Charlie is an undercover reporter for the Daily Guardian who discovers that various MP's have been kidnapped and their DNA taken in order for the Tory Party to bio-engineer the perfect politician.

Daavid Cameron, played by Ant of Ant and Dec fame, is revealed to be a descendant of Vlad the Impaler who seeks to breed a race of Ubermenschen Conservatives who dont rip off the tax payer with their expenses, who arent married to their cousins and who dont think he is foppish mug.

Charlie is kidnapped and his DNA taken and the last thing we see is a pram being pushed down the street by Anne Widecome with a child inside - who bears the face of Charlie.



2) Charlie Brooker in Dirty Dancing The Remake - Charlie plays the role of Patrick Swayze but to make it more poignant Charlie has a club foot.

Charlies club foot was a result of an accident in his youth where a frenzied hedgehog attacked him whilst he was out camping with the scouts. This was because he was wearing his socks that been kept in the same bag as his bacon butties.

Charlie wats to be a dancer but when he dances on his left foot he is as graceful as a swan, whilst when he tries to dance on his right foot he dances like John Precott after twenty pints and a kebab.

Charlie is working at Rhyll Butlins resort as a Morris dance teacher where he meets Jordan. She has just discovered that her husband Peter Andre is really a woman and she has fled to Rhyll to get over her heartbreak.

Charlie is there, the dancing instructor with a club foot who can see the stars but trips up each time he strives to grab them until Jordan enters the room.

Jordan also wants to dance but her plastic knockers are so lopsided that only one man, one with a club foot, can dance with her and her lop sided left breast.

Charlie and Jordan discover that his right club foot and her lopsided left breast go together like magic.

During the Grand Allegro Charlie does an assemblé en tournant and then Jordon lifts him into the air in triumph.

Its a moving story of how the human spirit can triumph over hedgehog inflicted injury and floppy plastic knockers.


3) Charlie Brooker is Sooty in ' Sooty and Sweep - the drug years'.

Charlie plays sooty - a once famous hand puppet now down on his luck.

Once a high living hand puppet who dated a plethora of TV stars such as Floella Benjamin and the Blue Peter dog, he is dropped by the BBC and becomes unemployed.

Sweep, also sacked, starts dealing crack in Brixton and he and sooty enter a nightmarish world of TV puppets and drug addiction where the Clangers high on smack are involved in a turf battle with the coke dealing Smurfs whilst the top gangster, a gangster known as Bagpuss, stalks the sreets slaying all opposition.

Charlie become a crack addict and one night he sees Bagpuss shoot dead four smurfs in an execution known as ' The Night The Streets Ran Blue With Blood'.

Bagpuss and his firm, led by a dark horse called Muffin The Mule a hitman for the Bagpuss gang, are hunting Charlie down.

Charlie has to fight his addiction to crack at the same time as he is struggling to survive the evil army of unemployed hand puppets on his trail.

The film culminates in a Tarantino style shoot out in cheap hotel in Brighton.

Charlie survives but his hand puppet protagonists dont.

In slow motion we see Charlie mowing down the army of evil hand puppets with an Uzi machine gun that he buys from a 14 year old school kid from Peckham.

These are the films we want to see, not more crap moves that are not about Charlie Brooker.

Krakatoa Awakes

Restless now are the rocks, sloughing smoke,
As the groaning goddess surrenders,
Her bubbling blood in crimson rivers,
That run in serpent streams to the sea.

Spitting fiery sparks from the stack,
She shrieks in pain as the pressure builds,
As deep within the magma chamber, contracting,
The earth labours to bring forth death.

In tumults of steam, with passionate sighs,
The waves bubble and boil as the sky abates,
Lava floods the shore with liquid fire,
As cold sea water penetrates her womb.

See her stone flanks shuddering, palpitating,
As she struggles to abort her many monsters,
Each erupting in chokes of ash and with fiery roar,
Until finally the white walls of a wave arise.

Rising forth from the infernal cauldron,
Monstrous in its majesty, awesome with power,
Arises anew the Lord of the Old Gods, Earth Trembler,
Sweeping mans hubris away with snarling waves.

The Strategy of Little Green Footballs and Harrys Place

After 9/11, the Neo-Conservatives and their Zionist allies saw an opportunity and developed a deceptive strategy of “Entryism” concealing their traditional anti-white Zionist supremacist bigotry with a facade of anti-jihadism.

Both Harrys Place, a site where the Jewish Zionist Edmund Standing writes, usually carries pieces on the BNP that are then copied onto the Little Green Footballs site: Revealing that both Harrys Place and Little Green Footballs real concern is empowering Zionism, not Islam.

Both HP AND LGF are Zionist controlled operations - whilst Little Green Footballs is a site for the swivel eyed, foaming at the mouth pro-Zionists and anti-Islam nutters, HP is a centre left site where the Zionism comes disguised with a moderate package.

The product is the same, just with a slightly different flavour to ensure the masses all get the flavour they like.

The 911 trick was to turn anti-Islamism into both anti-Islam sentiment and pro-Israel sentiment.

It worked.

The retarded Republican Right of the US public fell for it hook line and sinker - whilst waving the US flag they led their country into slavery to Zionism, Israel and AIPAC.

Dumb Americans were too stupid to see that what America required was a foreign policy that put the interests of American citizens first - not the interests of AIPAC, Israel, the oil companies, the military-industrial block and the globalists.

Instead in a knee jerk political spasm of historical stupidity, they waved the flag all the time their constitution, their civil rights and their liberty was removed.

In the name of 'fighting terrorism' that 'threatened the freedom of all Americans' they allowed their own government to remove their constitutional rights that guaranteed their liberty for hundreds of years.

Little Green Footballs and Harrys Place spend more time attacking the BNP than they do offering any constructive critique of Islam or Islamism.

This is because that is their primary role.

Both HP and LGF are designed to draw the hatred caused by 911 into support for Zionism and Israel, and therefore any groups that resist the domination of the Zionist cabals that control our media, much of our politics and much of our countries must also be targeted by LGF.

Therefore the two main enemies of LGF are ;

1) Islam

2) The BNP.

The BNP are in fact the primary threat to both HP and LGF.

This is because the BNP is not run by the US security services as much of the so called 'Islamist' terror groups like Al Qaeda are.

The Al Qaeda groups of the world wherever they appear are usually set up, funded, and controlled by either the CIA, the Saudi security services, the ISI of Pakistan or MI6.

From paying Al Qaeda in Libya to kill Gadaffi ( as MI6 did ) and the CIA running Osama Bin Laden as a CIA asset until the day of 911 ;

Link here ;

http://lukery.blogspot.com/2009/07/bombshell-bin-laden-worked-for-us-till.html

" Former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds dropped a bombshell on the Mike Malloy radio show, guest-hosted by Brad Friedman (audio, partial transcript).

In the interview, Sibel says that the US maintained 'intimate relations' with Bin Laden, and the Taliban, "all the way until that day of September 11."

These 'intimate relations' included using Bin Laden for 'operations' in Central Asia, including Xinjiang, China. These 'operations' involved using al Qaeda and the Taliban in the same manner "as we did during the Afghan and Soviet conflict," that is, fighting 'enemies' via proxies.

As Sibel has previously described, and as she reiterates in this latest interview, this process involved using Turkey (with assistance from 'actors from Pakistan, and Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia') as a proxy, which in turn used Bin Laden and the Taliban and others as a proxy terrorist army.

Control of Central Asia

The goals of the American 'statesmen' directing these activities included control of Central Asia's vast energy supplies and new markets for military products. "



HP and LGF are for the 'non-thinkers' of the anti-Islam movement.

The people that post on the site LGF are the sort of people that think ' My country right or wrong' means 'My president right or wrong'.

They think that anyone who waves a flag is a patriot - even if that flag is made in China and the person waving is a paid whore of the oil companies, the military-industrial block, Zionists and the mass media.

They think that anyone who speaks or preaches about 'Jeyzus' is a good guy - even if they are whoring, lieing, theiving hypocritical, mass murdering, corrupt son of a bitch.

The problem with most Americans is that they see politics only through the lens of America, and therefore any demagogue who wraps their rhetoric in the flag or who speaks about 'Jeyzus' will win them over.

LGF and HP are designed to cater to that market.

LGF appeals to the plastic patriots of America - the idiots who dont understand the difference between patriotism and nationalism.

HP appeals to the liberal leftist who likes their anti-Islam with a leftist tinge.

LGF appeals to 'patriots'.

A patriot is whore to whoever is in power - they serve only the government, not the people.

A nationalist serves only the interests of the people.

They see the 'government' as primarily a mechanism for the profit of sectarian interests within society.

Nationalists want the maximum freedom for the individual and the smallest State possible, as a nationalist knows that a large state and a large government are the enemies of democracy and the people.

Usually a nationalist regards the government, unless it is a nationalist government, as the enemy of the people.

Nationalists fought and died to build America.

Patriots surrendered America to the Neo-Conservative junta of Bush and to the Neo-Trotskyites of Obama.

Patriotism is simply slavery to the latest fool to wave the flag.

Nationalists see their only master as the Constitution and the will of the people.

Patriots will take up arms to invade foreign nations because politicians want to make profits from war just because that war is wrapped in the flag.

Nationalists act only to ensure the interests of the nation are protected by increasing national security within the nation.

Nationalists do not invade other nations - patriots will invade other nations as they serve the interests of the government and therefore they serve the interests of those that control the government.

The reason why the US was hit on 911 was because US troops were in Saudi Arabia and Al Qaeda were able to get into the US via the immigration system.

Note that the HP and LGF are against any political parties that demand ;

1) The withdrawal of and repatriation all troops from foreign bases


2) The ending of all lax immigration policies that allow immigration into our nations.


Dumb patriots are too stupid to understand that the fundamental cause of terrorism is when we are over there and they are over here.

Only when we withdraw from their lands (and thereby remove the causes of terrorism) will they not be able to attack us here ( when we remove them from our countries).

Instead the Neo-Con war on terrorism was based on ;

1) Increasing the presence of US troops and British troops over there (Iraq and Afghanisan, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia ) and waging a 'crusade' against Islam

2) Allowing more Muslims to enter our countries via refusing to tighten the immigration rules

911 was the opportunity for the US military Industrial Complex, the British Military Industrial Complex, the UK and US Zionists, the Oil Companies and the Globalists to turn the fear and trauma caused by 911 into unquestioning obedience to their plans.

Wrap the flag around the New Oil Imperialism and the sheeple would bleat and applaud even as theur liberty and constitution were being stolen away from them beneath their very noses.

The traitors like Bush and the 911 Cabalists were only able to complete their plans with the help of websites like LGF and HP.

They are accomplices to the crimes of their masters.

Therefore as the dogs they are, they attack who they are told to attack by their masters.

I support America 100 % - but I despise the US Military Industrial Block, the Zionists of AIPAC, the oil companies and the corrupt media and security services that control the US

I support the right of Israel to exist 100 % - but I despise the Zionists that control it and whose tentacles slither in the halls of power in Britain and the US.

I support the right of the Palestinian people to national self determination 100 % - but I despise Islamism.

Only when the inner enemies are purged from all our nations will our nations and our people be free.

There are probably less than 100,000 of these inner criminals in both our nations - they are the head of the dragon, and that must be severed if both of our nations are to survive and our peoples be free.

The Thunderbird

Rotting upon the red stones of Last Stand Hill,
The medicine ground of Chief Sitting Bull,
Its brow blessed with blood where brave men fell,
And sacred vision found its earthly form,
The sun bleached bones of the Sioux and 7th Calvary,
Are resurrected in the glory of greasy grass creek.


Only one body was spared the scalping blade,
Washed by the women and interred undefiled,
General Custer given due honour as a brave foe,
His grave then graced with the coup of Crazy Horse,
So that his ghost may not rise beneath the moon,
And curse victory in a cage called the reservation.


The sun will dance no more upon the holy Black Hills,
In its war bonnet at dawn where the battle was fought,
For wagon wheels roll and rut our hunting grounds,
Roaming in packs, ravening the earth for gold,
The sacred hoop is broken, and all nature weeps,
As a thunderbird rides the storm, and sets afire the sky.

The Gary McKinnon Defence He Should Run

I have been thinking about the Gary McKinnon case and I have worked out the best defence he should run.

In all the testimony of Gary McKinnon that he has given in media interviews and police transcripts under caution he has mentioned three important things ;

1) That he downloaded from secret NASA files images of UFO's above the earth taken from secret US sy satellites

2) That he downloaded US navy pay files and fleet deployment listings that revealed the US has an off earth space fleet run by the US navy

3) That he saw other files that revealed the existence of UFO related technology being used by the US military.


Now this leaves prosecution case in a perilous position.

In order for McKinnon to be held guilty, then at the time of the criminal offences he committed he must not have been 'insane' or suffering from a mental abnormality that affected him to such an extent he was not aware of what he was doing.

But the testimony of McKinnon is so 'absurd' and so 'insane' ( as everyone knows that UFO's dont exist, that the US navy does not have an off earth space fleet and that the US military does not have UFO technology and energy systems ) that at the time of the offence he must have been insane.

In order for the prosecution to prove the case they must also prove his sanity at the time he did the offences. The testimony reveals that McKinnon was clearly insane.

In order for the prosecution to prove that McKinnon was not insane then they must admit that ;

1) The US has an off earth space fleet
2) That they have UFO technology and energy systems
3) That NASA does have photographs of UFOS's above the earth

Therefore the prosecution have to admit that the testimony of McKinnon was correct, in order to prove that he was not insane at the time he committed the offences.

In fact McKinnon must still be insane right now - as he still believes that he saw those things he downloaded from the US computer systems.

Therefore as he was insane at the time he committed the offences and he must still be insane now, as he still believes he saw those 'insane' things he said he saw, then he clearly should not be allowed to go to trial.

It appears that the judges who heard this appeal did not understand the nature of the linkage between McKinnons mental health and his capacity to stand trial nor the lawfulness of such a trial when he is clearly still 'insane'.

McKinnon must clearly be insane.

The fact he said those 'insane' things means he has to be insane - rational people who are responsible for their actions do not see such things as McKinnon said he saw on the US computer files.

The US must also, if it wants to win the case, prove that the material McKinnon saw was classified material.

If they cannot prove the material he saw was protected under defence laws, then they cannot assert the damage to 'national security' occured.

Therefore the US has to admit both that the files McKinnon said he saw were real, and that they are the most highly classified documents in the US military, or they cannot prove their case in relation to the charge that he damaged US national security.

What McKinnon must do is make this a crusade for UFO disclosure.

In order to convict him the US must in effect admit UFO's are real.

This case means McKinnon can take on the military industrial block in public - and force the US to expose the secret it has been keeping.

If he explains the moral aspect of his actions, to find out if the US is hiding advanced energy systems that could save the planet, and that he was motivated not to damage US national security interests, but to simply expose the truth about UFO's - then the jury will not convict him.

Hugo Chavez Takes On the Media Corporatocracy

Credit where credit is due, Chavez is bang on target here.

The power of the modern mass media to manipulate democracy and democratic elections is the ultimate 'soft tyranny'.

From the BBC, Fox News, The Guardian, The Telegraph etc etc - each of them are as bent as a nine bob note. They pump out propaganda for the interests of their masters, not for the benefit of the people and especially not the truth.

They can control a society without the people of that society even being aware they are enslaved.

Therefore the media must be forced to no longer interfere, manipulate or control the political process by using their propaganda to influence any society into voting for whom the media want elected.

The present system where the media propagandise the political parties that their corporate owners support is the antithesis of democracy - the power to manipulate individual minds and create false perceptions of a 'social consesus' as regards politics by the media must be dealt with, and Chavez's example is a good model to follow.


As stated elsewhere " For Ortega Diaz, journalists should be criminally liable not just for what they write, but also for the perceptions that the things they write create in their readers. Anyone who uses the mass media to communicate something that disturbs “social peace,” “mental health” or “public morals” can end up in jail. Her bill calls for the incarceration of anyone who, through their use of mass media, “destabilizes the State’s institutions.” Anyone who broadcasts anything that may cause “hatred and hostility” toward people based on, among other things, their “ideology or political affiliation” will end up in the slammer. "

Seeing as we live in a corrupt country where the entire media demonise the BNP in order to benefit their own puppet political parties, a law requiring the media not propagandise for a political party or against a political party is long overdue.

The sickening boast on the front page of the Sun a few years ago ' It woz the sun wot won it ' was the death knell for our democracy.

Now action must be taken to restore democratic politics to our nation.






Venezuela: 'Freedom of expression must be limited'
By CHRISTOPHER TOOTHAKER (AP) – 1 day ago

CARACAS, Venezuela — Venezuela's top prosecutor insisted Thursday that freedom of expression in Venezuela "must be limited" and proposed legislation that would slap additional restrictions on the country's news media.

The new law would punish the owners of radio stations, television channels and newspapers that have attempted to "cause panic" and "disturb social peace," Attorney General Luisa Ortega said.

It also would punish media owners who "manipulate the news with the purpose of transmitting a false perception of the facts."

"Freedom of expression must be limited," Ortega said.

Ortega urged lawmakers to consider her suggestions as they debate a bill that would punish as-yet-undefined "media crimes." The National Assembly, which is controlled by allies of President Hugo Chavez, is expected to approve the measure in coming months.

Jose Miguel Vivanco, Americas director for Human Rights Watch, warned the proposed legislation "would be a terrible regression for freedom of expression."

"They are trying to increase the penalties for expressions that could be considered offensive for authorities," Vivanco said in an interview broadcast by RCN Radio in Colombia.

Carlos Lauria of the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists called the bill "reminiscent of the dark days of Latin American dictatorships with its archaic provisions for so-called media crimes."

Chavez's administration is slowly tightening its grip over the news media, raising concerns among watchdog and human rights groups that accuse the government of trying to stifle dissent.

Venezuela's telecommunications commission notified 50 radio stations earlier this week that their broadcast licenses could be revoked because they failed to update their registrations. Commission chief Diosdado Cabello said a final determination on the licenses will be made following investigations. He said authorities might also seize broadcasting equipment.

Nearly 200 other broadcasters that did not meet a June deadline to register also will be investigated, but have not yet been formally notified, Cabello said

Broadcast regulators have also opened a series of investigations into Globovision, the only strongly anti-Chavez channel remaining on the open airwaves.

Station vice president Carlos Alberto Zuloaga accused Chavez on Thursday of "deciding to shut down Globovision."

"He's just looking for the way to diminish the political cost," Zuloaga said at a forum in Washington organized by the libertarian Cato Institute.

Chavez denies that he intends to silence critics, saying his government fully respects freedom of expression.

Associated Press writer Jorge Rueda contributed to this report.